Friday, September 12, 2014

Free The Remaining Cuban Five -Ahora!

A Todos Nuestros Hermanos De Cuba Y El Mundo
por Ramón Labañino Salazar
15 de junio de 2014
 

Ser padre es virtud y fortuna
Es privilegio y esencia
Es amanecer siempre fiel
Arropado de ternuras.
Ser padre es fuego en el invierno
Es caricia primicia
Es escala universal
En los brazos de infantes.
Ser padre es dolor a veces
Es lucha y victoria
Que tiene su gloria
En un beso que se crece...
Ser padre es regazo de paz
Como el agua tibia y dulce
Que sale de las entranas de la tierra
Para curar y borrar heridas...
Pero sobre todo padre es
Amor, mucho amor
Eternamente amor...
!!!Felicidades Papa en tu Dia!!!!!
!!Cinco Abrazos Fieles!!!
Ramon.
Junio 15,2014. 9:18 a.m.
FCI Ashland, Kentucky.
 

The Cuban Five - when five minus two makes Five
by Javier Farje (including photos)
June 2, 2014
Reprinted from Latin America Bureau (UK)
Two of the Cuban Five - René González and Fernando González - are back in Cuba but their thoughts are still with their imprisoned compatriots. LAb editor Javier Farje writes from Havana.
The old lady came to us and asked, timidly, while she was pointing at the short moustachioed man who was talking to us: “Is that Fernando?”. “Yes, that’s him”, we told her. Her face lit up. She ran towards the group of women pensioners who gather in this central park in Havana every morning to do their daily exercises, and confirmed what we had just told her: “yes, it is Fernando”, she said, her voice trembling with emotion. Immediately, they stopped their morning routine, turned towards us and started clapping and chanting slogans which I didn't at first understand.
A group of school children was also in the park doing physical education. As soon as the teacher noticed the clapping, he also turned towards us and saw what was going on. He told the children: “Kids, that's Fernando”. One by one, the old people and the children came towards Fernando and started to hug him and kiss him.
Wherever we walked, people recognised him: “it is Fernando.” The man we are talking about is not a movie star, a famous singer, a renowned painter or a political leader. Fernando González Llort spent 15 years in a US prison accused of espionage. He was arrested together with René González (no relation), Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero and Gerardo Hernández in 1998. Tried in 2001, Fernando was sentenced to 19 years, of which he has served 15. He returned to Cuba in March this year. René was given a lesser sentence and returned to the island for good in 2013 (he had been given permission to travel to Cuba for personal reasons in 2011) on condition that he gave up his American citizenship (he was born in Chicago).
The Cuban Five were accused of spying on the Cuban American community at the behest of the Cuban government ,whcih was afraid of terrorist attacks on the island. The trial was so flawed that even Amnesty International, an organisation renowned for its criticism of the Cuban government's human rights record, took up their case, saying that there was no reason for such harsh treatment. Two of the five, Antonio and Gerardo, are serving long-term prison sentences and Ramón is due to be released in 2025.
You can see interviews with relatives of the five and an analysis of the history of the case in the program the author made for HispanTV (below).
Since his release and return to Cuba, Fernando has been fêted as a hero. He goes everywhere with a minder, attends the opening of rum factories and gives conferences. And yet, for all his status, he is longing for a more normal life. He is aware that he has the responsibilities of a celebrity and must greet Cubans, especially because the Cuban Five is the most important international political campaign the country has conducted in the past 16 years. But there is also the private man: “It is difficult to adapt”, he tells me," but I have my family, friends, and others and that helps." He has been invited to travel abroad to talk about his experience but he has refused: “I need Cuba now, a lot of Cuba”, he says.
Fernando reflects about the whole trial, the redacted testimonies from “witnesses” which not even his lawyers were allowed to read, the initial solitary confinement in a Florida jail, and the comrades he has left behind. Although Fernando and René are free, the Cuban Five have not become the Cuban Three. And Fernando and René tell me that, for as long as Ramón, Antonio and Gerardo remain in prison, they are not free either.
The campaign in Cuba has been relentless. In the recent attempts to improve relations between Cuba and the USA, the Cuban Five remain an irritant in an otherwise more positive atmosphere, with the implementation of a migration reform by Cuba and the relaxation of restrictions on the sending of remesas (money remittances) and on trips by US and indeed Cuban American citizens to the island.
René is more relaxed. After all, he has been back for quite some time. Although he only moved permanently to Cuba in 2013, he had been travelling to Havana regularly since 2011, when he was given permission to visit his dying brother. He still gets the odd salute or hug but he has learned to cope with fame.
The relatives of the remaining three have established a bond with Fernando and René, as they are the only link with their imprisoned loved ones. They have the consolation that human rights organisations which are usually critical of Cuba are against the way the USA has politicised the case and put behind bars Cubans who did what Americans do all the time: go abroad to assess the dangers of terrorist attacks.
Although Fernando is enjoying the first months of freedom, his thoughts, he tells me, are across the sea in the US, where the remaining three still languish in prison. He shakes hands, kisses old ladies, encourages children to study, smiles at people, and copes with life in the limelight. He is back in Cuban soil but a part of him has not landed, not just yet.
   
La Cuba Cinco - cuando cinco dos menos hace cinco
por Javier Farje
2 de junio de 2014
Tomado de Latin America Bureau (UK)
Dos de los Cinco Cubanos - René González y Fernando González - están de vuelta en Cuba, pero sus pensamientos están todavía con sus compatriotas encarcelados. Editor Lab Javier Farje escribe desde La Habana.
La anciana se acercó a nosotros y preguntó tímidamente, mientras ella estaba señalando al hombre de bigote corto que estaba hablando con nosotros: "¿Eso es Fernando?". "Sí, es él", le dijimos. Su rostro se iluminó. Ella corrió hacia el grupo de mujeres pensionistas que se reúnen en este parque central de La Habana cada mañana para hacer sus ejercicios diarios, y confirmó lo que le acababa de decir: "sí, es Fernando", dijo, con la voz temblorosa por la emoción. Inmediatamente, ellos dejaron su rutina de la mañana, se volvió hacia nosotros y empezaron a aplaudir y corear consignas que yo no entendía al principio.
Un grupo de niños de la escuela era también en el parque que hace la educación física. Tan pronto como la maestra notó los aplausos, también se volvió hacia nosotros y vio lo que estaba pasando. Él dijo a los niños: "Los niños, eso es Fernando". Uno a uno, los ancianos y los niños vinieron hacia Fernando y comenzó a abrazarlo y besarlo.
Donde quiera que caminamos, la gente lo reconoció: "es Fernando." El hombre que estamos hablando no es una estrella de cine, un cantante famoso, un pintor de renombre o un líder político. Fernando González Llort pasó 15 años en una prisión de EE.UU. acusado de espionaje. Fue detenido junto a René González (sin parentesco), Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero y Gerardo Hernández en 1998. Intentado en 2001, Fernando fue condenado a 19 años, de la que ha servido 15. Regresó a Cuba en marzo de este año. René fue condenado a una pena menor y regresó a la isla para siempre en 2013 (se le había dado permiso para viajar a Cuba por razones personales en 2011) con la condición de que él renunció a su ciudadanía estadounidense (nació en Chicago).
La Cuba Cinco fueron acusados ​​de espionaje en la comunidad cubano-americana, a instancias del gobierno de Cuba, lo cual fue miedo de los ataques terroristas contra la isla. El juicio fue tan defectuoso que incluso Amnistía Internacional, una organización conocida por sus críticas a la situación de los derechos humanos del gobierno cubano, asumió su caso, diciendo que no había ninguna razón para que tales malos tratos. Dos de los cinco, Antonio y Gerardo, están cumpliendo penas de prisión a largo plazo y Ramón se debe a ser puesto en libertad en 2025.
Usted puede ver entrevistas con familiares de los Cinco y un análisis de la historia del caso en el programa de la autora realizada por HispanTV (abajo).
Desde su liberación y regreso a Cuba, Fernando ha sido agasajado como un héroe. Él va a todas partes con un cuidador, asiste a la apertura de fábricas de ron y da conferencias. Y, sin embargo, a pesar de su estado, que es el anhelo por una vida más normal. Él es consciente de que tiene las responsabilidades de una celebridad y debe saludar a los cubanos, sobre todo porque la Cuba Cinco es la campaña política internacional más importante que el país ha realizado en los últimos 16 años. Pero también está el hombre privado: "Es difícil adaptarse", me dice, "pero tengo a mi familia, amigos, y otros, y eso ayuda." Ha sido invitado a viajar al extranjero para hablar de su experiencia, pero se ha negado: "Necesito Cuba ahora, un montón de Cuba", dice.
Fernando refleja sobre todo el juicio, los testimonios redactados de "testigos" que se les permitía ni siquiera sus abogados para leer, el régimen de aislamiento inicial en una cárcel de Florida, y los compañeros que ha dejado atrás. Aunque Fernando y René son gratuitos, la Cuba Cinco no se han convertido en la Cuba de tres. Y Fernando y René me dicen que, durante el tiempo que Ramón, Antonio y Gerardo permanecen en prisión, ellos tampoco son gratuitos.
La campaña en Cuba ha sido implacable. En los recientes intentos por mejorar las relaciones entre Cuba y los EE.UU., la Cuba Five siendo un irritante en una atmósfera de otro modo más positivo, con la implementación de una reforma migratoria en Cuba y la relajación de las restricciones al envío de remesas de dinero (remesas) y de los viajes de EE.UU. y los ciudadanos estadounidenses de hecho cubanos a la isla.
René es más relajado. Después de todo, él ha estado allí durante bastante tiempo. A pesar de que sólo se trasladó permanentemente a Cuba en 2013, había estado viajando a La Habana con regularidad desde 2011, cuando se le dio permiso para visitar a su hermano moribundo. Él todavía recibe el saludo extraño o un abrazo, pero él ha aprendido a lidiar con la fama.
Los familiares de los tres restantes han establecido un vínculo con Fernando y René, ya que son el único vínculo con sus seres queridos encarcelados. Ellos tienen el consuelo de que organizaciones de derechos humanos que suelen ser crítico de Cuba están en contra de la forma en que los EE.UU. ha politizado el caso y poner tras las rejas de los cubanos que hicieron lo hacen los americanos todo el tiempo: ir al extranjero para evaluar los peligros de ataques terroristas.
Aunque Fernando está disfrutando de los primeros meses de libertad, sus pensamientos, me dice, están al otro lado del mar, en los EE.UU., donde los tres restantes todavía languidecen en la cárcel. Él le da la mano, besa viejitas, anima a los niños a estudiar, le sonríe a la gente, y hace frente a la vida en el centro de atención. Él está de vuelta en suelo cubano, sino una parte de él no ha aterrizado, todavía no.
 

Reply To : peaceact@reply.salsalabs.com
Tue, Sep 09, 2014 03:47 PM
Peace Action: Working for Peace Since 1957 FacebookTwitterBlogContact us
Dear All,
We are at a crossroads, faced with a climate crisis that threatens to end our world as we know it.  We can’t afford the greenhouse gas emissions from the way we live and from war and preparations for war.  We must end the fossil fuel energy economy which war protects.
Join us for the People’s Climate March in New York City on Sunday, September 21! 

The specter of nuclear war still hangs over the world. US policy is the main obstacle to effective global action on climate change, world peace, and nuclear disarmament.  Peace, antiwar and environmental activists must join together for immediate action!
The Peace, Justice and Climate contingent will assemble at 10:00 am for a pre-rally on Central Park West north of Columbus Circle.   Confirmed speakers include Bill McKibben, Tom Hayden, Medea Benjamin, Father John Dear, Margaret Stevens, and Erica Violet-Lee of Idle No More, with music by Emma’s Revolution, Dar Williams, and Holly Near.   The march steps off at 11:30am.
We go to New York to demand that the US government:

•    Stop wars for oil
•    Redirect military spending to fund green jobs and sustainable infrastructure
•    Stop the Keystone pipeline project, fracking and offshore drilling
•    Move to abolish all nuclear weapons as required by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
•    Stop blocking proposals for effective international action on climate put forward by developing countries

Be sure to check out the Climate Convergence conference on Friday, September 19 and Saturday, September 20 in New York, with keynote speakers including Naomi Klein and many more.
Humbly for peace,

Kevin Martin
Executive Director
Peace Action Education Fund
PS: Your tax-deductible contribution to Peace Action Education Fund will support our efforts to build a strong peace presence in the movement to stop climate change.

empowered by Salsa
Thu, Sep 11, 2014 03:06 PM
Peace Action: Working for Peace Since 1957 FacebookTwitterBlogContact us
 
The media calls the U.S. public war weary.
Yes, the people are war weary after seemingly endless and pointless wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Deep down most people know that endless war is not a solution. The U.S. cannot bomb an organization, ideology, religious fanaticism or sectarian strife out of existence. As we continued military action, Al Qaeda has continued to grow. There is no long term military solution to the threat of ISIS or terrorism. 
Write a letter to the editor to remind the President, Congress and our communities: there is no military solution.
In Iraq, history proves that short term military victories turn into long term nightmares. Ten years ago, U.S. private contractors were brutally killed. The battle for Fallujah was waged with horrendous consequences. Now ISIS controls Fallujah. For the people of Fallujah, the U.S.-instigated nightmare continues.
We need a coalition for a political solution, not military action!
There are alternatives to bombing ISIS in Iraq and Syria that are not posed in public opinion polls and are largely absent in the political debate. The alternatives require the U.S. to replace military action with a real international diplomatic response that will provide the political power, the economic incentives and support for rebuilding a non-sectarian Iraq, humanitarian aid and an end to the Syrian war. 
The President and Congress should:
1. Stop the bombing and military escalation. We’ve seen before how unintended consequences can spiral out of control, causing more pain and suffering in the region and hurting U.S. security.
2.  Hit ISIS where it hurts: the wallet! Take steps to cut the cash flowing to ISIS.  Crack down on Turkish, Iraqi, and other oil dealers who are purchasing ISIS's oil on the black market, which would cut ISIS off from its most important revenue stream.
3. Build a  coalition for a political solution, not military action! Support a United Nations-led effort to convene Iraq, Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iran, European Union and Russia to develop strong diplomatic, economic and political initiatives to restrict the flow of arms, militias and finances across borders. Support restarting UN-sponsored negotiations to end the Syrian civil war.
Write a letter to the editor There is no long term solution to the threat of ISIS. No to bombing! Yes to a political solution.
You can also call Congress, which is currently somewhat confused about whether it will do its Constitutional job and vote on any authorization for war, with this same message. The U.S. Capitol switchboard number is (202) 224-3121, they will connect you to your U.S. Representative or Senators’ offices.
The people are war weary. Peace Action is war wise and our mission is to build a movement that is vocal in articulating the alternatives to war.  Please write a letter today.

Power to the peaceful,
Judith LeBlanc
Field Director
Peace Action
P.S. - Our sister organizations and some reporters are providing an abundance of resource materials, some are below.
3. Six Steps Short of War to Beat ISIS] by Phyllis Bennis, a Peace Action Advisory Board member
empowered by Salsa

Saturday: No U.S. War on Iraq and Syria!

No U.S. War in Iraq and Syria

Saturday, September 13, 1:00 pm
Park Street Station - Downtown Boston

President Obama plans to launch a new war on Iraq and Syria, using US air strikes, arms, money, and training, and over 1,500 U.S. ground troops. The U.S. war on Iraq in 2003-2011 caused this crisis.
We can't let this happen again. Join together to protest another US war in Iraq and Syria. It’s time once again to stand up for peace and justice and against this insanity.
UJP urges everyone to organize protests, write letters and op-eds, sign petitions, lobby Congress and take other actions.
Sponsored by United for Justice with Peace, Massachusetts Peace Action and the Committtee for Peace & Human Rights (list in formation). Contact info@justicewithpeace.org to endorse.
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/events/1500590576853570/

Helen Caldicott: Facing our Nuclear Responsibilities

In honor of the International Day of Peace

Facing Our Nuclear Responsibilities

Saturday, Sept. 20, 2014, 2:00-4:00pm
NEWTON CITY HALL – War Memorial Auditorium
1000 Commonwealth Ave, Newton

Helen Caldicott

Dr. Helen Caldicott

Renowned Activist, Nobel Peace Prize Nominee
A Founder of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR)
and Women’s Action for Nuclear Disarmament (WAND)
Author “The New Nuclear Danger”, “Nuclear Power is Not the Answer”
Guntram Mueller, Board Chairman, Mass. Peace Action.  Our nuclear arsenals and their costs; Status of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty and other international efforts
Diane Turco, co-founder of Cape Downwinders, Pilgrim Coalition Steering Committee. Nuclear power: waste fuel issue, the environment, status of the Pilgrim Plant
Moderator: Beverly Droz, Past National President, WAND
Questions & Answers session from the Audience

Newton is a Mayors for Peace City

Sponsored by Newton Dialogues on Peace & War
Co-sponsors: 20/20 Action, Arlington UJP, Cambridge UJP, Cape Codders for Peace & Justice, Cape Downwinders, Coalition for a Strong United Nations, Green Decade/Newton, Massachusetts Peace Action, Merrimack Valley People for Peace, North Shore Coalition for Peace & Justice, On Behalf of Planet Earth, Pilgrim Coalition, United for Justice with Peace, Veterans for Peace/Smedley D. Butler Brigade, Women's Action for New Directions, Women's International League for Peace & Freedom – Boston.   Co-Sponsors will set up literature tables and actions at this event
Contact: Nancy Wrenn, 617-969-2758, ncwrenn@aol.com

UFPJ Urgent UPDATE: Bombing Iraq and Syria – A Delusion, Not A Solution




 


 
President Obama may prefer the term “counter-terrorism,” but it is clear from last night’s speech that he is taking the United States into another war.
 
His long-term plan for bombing Iraq and Syria, for placing U.S. troops on the ground as “trainers,” and for assistance to allied fighters, is opening another tragic chapter in the failed “war on terrorism,” initiated by President Bush and rejected by the voters in 2008.  
 
We deplore the brutality and violence of ISIS, but we do not believe that U.S. air strikes will solve the problem, even if there are short-term military gains. Despite the President’s many references to “a coalition,” in reality the United States will be intervening unilaterally in two civil wars, each of which has multiple factions and complex roots.
 
Time to learn from experience:
 
The U.S. invasion of Iraq tore the lid off of a Pandora’s box that has wreaked havoc with the lives of millions of people over the past dozen years. It is that invasion, which gave rise to ISIS and “terrorism,” in places where it had not existed.
 
U.S. air-strikes –whether in Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan or Afghanistan- have never had the precision that is claimed. Thousands of civilians have been killed, with the result that America’s enemies multiplied.  
 
The “new strategy” the President just unveiled isn’t new. It was tried by President George W. Bush in Afghanistan, where it failed, creating a Washington demand for tens of thousands of U.S. combat troops. These troops have added to the instability of the country, while failing to defeat the Taliban.
 
We believe there are better choices:
 
*Make diplomacy and humanitarian assistance the priority
*Seek improved relations with Iran to end the fighting in the region
*Work through United Nations to halt the flow of financing and weapons to ISIS
*Re-start UN-directed negotiations to end the civil war in Syria
*Mobilize to solve the real problems in the region- poverty, hunger, drought, joblessness
 
Our Voices are Needed Now…The White House and Members of Congress are Paying Close Attention to Public Opinion.
 
  Call the White House
  Comments: 202.456.1111; Switchboard: 202-456-1414
 
Call your Senators and Congressional Representatives
Capitol Switchboard: 202- 224-3121
 
Let them know, you strongly oppose perpetual war in the Middle East. Emphasize that U.S. bombing of two countries will bring more suffering and violence, and that there is no realistic alternative to diplomacy and humanitarian aid.
 
Ask your member of Congress to speak out now in opposition to US military intervention in Iraq and Syria.
 
Please make a donation to UFPJ so that we can continue to keep our member groups and dedicated activists linked together for effective action and impact.
Help us continue to do this critical work: Make a donation to UFPJ today.
UNITED FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE
www.unitedforpeace.org

To subscribe, visit www.unitedforpeace.org/email

 
Fight The Obama War Machine Rally At Park Street, Boston Saturday September 13- I PM- The Anti-War Struggle Begins-Again 
 
NEW WARS / OLD WARS – Are You Feeling Safer Now?

Amid the obsessive mainstream media chatter about whether Obama’s war is legal without Congressional approval – probably not, though most members of Congress are not anxious for a vote anytime soon – there is almost no mention that bombing Syria without the agreement of its sovereign government is clearly a violation of international law.  This applies to unilateral actions by the US or NATO, or any “collation of the willing” Obama can cobble together in the Middle East.  The likely US “allies” in this enterprise are themselves dictatorships via fake elections (Egypt, Jordan) or absolute Gulf Monarchies (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, etc.).  Only the UN Security Council is legally empowered to apply military force across borders, except in the case of immediate defense against foreign attack.

 

Saturday, September 13

No U.S. War on Iraq and Syria!

1pm, Park St. MBTA Station

 

President Obama plans to launch a new war on Iraq and Syria, using US air strikes, arms, money, and training, and over 1,500 U.S. ground troops. The U.S. war on Iraq in 2003-2011 caused this crisis.
We can't let this happen again. Join together to protest another US war in Iraq and Syria. It’s time once again to stand up for peace and justice and against this insanity.
Sponsored by United for Justice with Peace, Massachusetts Peace Action and the Committtee for Peace & Human Rights (list in formation). Facebook: 
 

 

PHYLLIS BENNIS: Six Steps Short of War to Beat ISIS

The bottom line is there is no immediate action that will make ISIS disappear, even if U.S. airstrikes manage to get the right target somewhere and take out an APC or a truckload of guys with RPGs or whatever… As horrifying as the beheading of the two U.S. journalists was, revenge is never a good basis for foreign policy. We should keep in mind that Matthew Olson, the outgoing head of the National Counterterrorism Center, said last week that “there is no credible information that [ISIS] is planning to attack the United States,” and there is “no indication at this point of a cell of foreign fighters operating in the United States—full stop.”  … We have to recognize that military attacks are not only wrong in a host of ways (illegal in international law, immoral because of civilian casualties, a distraction from vitally needed diplomacy) but also that those strikes are making real solutions impossible… weakening ISIS requires eroding the support it relies on from tribal leaders, military figures, and ordinary Iraqi Sunnis.  More

 

MANIPLUATING PUBLIC OPINION. . . Again

 

After Media Assault Americans Believe ISIS Threat To US

After a continual barrage of media hype surrounding a group of Islamist fighters in Iraq and Syria the American people are scared that the homeland is in jeopardy. According to a CNN/ORC Poll, 45% of Americans see that ISIS is a “very serious threat to the US.” That number parallels what Americans thought of Al Qaeda in 2003. 90% of Americans, according to the poll, believe ISIS is some level of threat to the US. Despite ISIS being a regional group trying to establish an caliphate in the Middle East and zero evidence to back up the claim, 70% of Americans also think ISIS has agents in the US ready to strike. While media distortions are a large part of why the public has become hysterical on ISIS, part of the response is also due to a game ISIS itself has been playing… The US intervening may be exactly what ISIS wants at this point. That like the killings in Iraq by Al Qaeda that led to US blunders in Fallujah, ISIS is setting the US up for a similar overreaction.  More

 

Of course, the “threat” to the US is a lie. . .

Some News Organizations Finally Realize Obama’s War Message is Misleading

President Obama’s plan to “degrade and destroy” the Islamic State counts on pretty much everything going right in a region of the world where pretty much anything the U.S. does always goes wrong. Our newspapers of record today finally remembered it’s their job to point stuff like that out. The New York Times… [points out] the essential but often overlooked fact that “American intelligence agencies have concluded that [the Islamic State] poses no immediate threat to the United States.” “Daniel Benjamin, who served as the State Department’s top counterterrorism adviser during Mr. Obama’s first term, said the public discussion about the ISIS threat has been a “farce,” with “members of the cabinet and top military officers all over the place describing the threat in lurid terms that are not justified.” “It’s hard to imagine a better indication of the ability of elected officials and TV talking heads to spin the public into a panic…  More

 

Since 9/11, Fewer Americans Say Terrorism Top Problem

Thirteen years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington, D.C., terrorism is far less top-of-mind for Americans than it was immediately after those attacks. Mentions of terrorism did increase slightly this month as terrorist groups such as ISIS took actions that directly affect the U.S., prompting calls for U.S. action from many politicians and some journalists. While terrorism may be less top-of-mind to Americans -- and less likely to register as the most important problem facing the nation -- many still see it as important when asked about it specifically. In January polling, 72% of Americans said they felt terrorism was an important issue for Congress and the president to deal with this year. In February, 77% said international terrorism was a critical threat to the U.S. The economy or dissatisfaction with government may trump terrorism as the most important problem at the moment, but many Americans still see terrorism as a threat that must be dealt with, even 13 years after 9/11.  More

 

http://media.cagle.com/82/2014/06/17/149866_600.jpgFISK: The Latest Evil Force, Since the Last Evil Force

Resurrection, reinvention and linguistics. Barack Obama did the lot. And now he’s taking America to war in Syria as well as Iraq. Oh yes, and he’s going to defeat Isis, its “barbarism”, “genocide”, its “warped ideology” – until the bad guys are “vanquished from the earth”. What happened to George W Bush?  … One can see, of course, how difficult these lessons in Middle East history must be for the average American. All these forces of evil being vanquished over and over again, and then – bingo – there’s another force of evil to vanquish. So Obama produces words that are easy to swallow. “genocide”, “barbarism”, “cancer”.   More

 

BASEVICH: Obama’s Plans Ignore the Lessons of the ME Wars

For the 20 years between 1991 and 2011 — the interval between Operation Desert Storm and the final withdrawal of U.S. forces after a lengthy occupation of Iraq — Washington policymakers, Republican and Democratic, relied on various forms of coercion to align Iraq with American expectations of how a country ought to run. The effort failed abysmally… Destroying what Obama calls the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant won’t create an effective and legitimate Iraqi state. It won’t restore the possibility of a democratic Egypt. It won’t dissuade Saudi Arabia from funding jihadists. It won’t pull Libya back from the brink of anarchy. It won’t end the Syrian civil war.  It won’t bring peace and harmony to Somalia and Yemen. It won’t persuade the Taliban to lay down their arms in Afghanistan. It won’t end the perpetual crisis of Pakistan. It certainly won’t resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All the military power in the world won’t solve those problems.  More

 

WARNING TO WAR SUPPORTERS
If you want to bomb a country every time an evil group murders people in a gruesome manner, you’ll have to bomb a lot of countries including our own.  ISIS draws its strength in Iraq from resentment of the Iraqi government, which bombs its own cities using U.S. weapons, and which beheads people, albeit in grainier footage with lower production values.  Allies in the region, including allies that support ISIS, including allies armed by the United States(some of which arms end up in the hands of ISIS), themselves behead people regularly. But is that worse than other types of killing? When President Barack Obama blew up a 16 year old American boy whom nobody had ever accused of so much as jaywalking, and blew up six other kids who were too close to him at the time, do you imagine his head remained on his body? …The fact that it’s Obama doesn’t make it OK. A majority of you supported attacking Afghanistan and within a couple of years a majority of you said Afghanistan should not have been attacked. Why not? Not because there weren’t evil people in Afghanistan, but because bombing the country made everything worse, not better.  More

 

Since 9-11 America's Insane Foreign Policy Has Killed a Million and Created ISIS

A month after September 11, Donald Rumsfeld stood at a podium in front of a $2 billion B-2 bomber at Whiteman AFB in Missouri and addressed the aircrews of the 509th Bomber Wing [4], before they took off across the world to wreak misdirected vengeance on the people of Afghanistan. Rumsfeld told them, "We have two choices. Either we change the way we live, or we must change the way they live. We choose the latter. And you are the ones who will help achieve that goal."  Since then, the United States has launched more than 94,000 air strikes [5], mostly on Afghanistan and Iraq, but also on Libya, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia. Rumsfeld's plan has undoubtedly achieved his goal of changing the way people live in those countries, killing a million of them [6] and reducing tens of millions more to lives of disability, disfigurement, dislocation, grief and poverty. More

 

OUR SAUDI “ALLIES” AT WORK: The Missing Twenty-Eight Pages of the 9/11 Report

“There’s nothing in it about national security,” Walter Jones, a Republican congressman from North Carolina who has read the missing pages, contends. “It’s about the Bush Administration and its relationship with the Saudis.” Stephen Lynch, a Massachusetts Democrat, told me that the document is “stunning in its clarity,” and that it offers direct evidence of complicity on the part of certain Saudi individuals and entities in Al Qaeda’s attack on America. “Those twenty-eight pages tell a story that has been completely removed from the 9/11 Report,” Lynch maintains. Another congressman who has read the document said that the evidence of Saudi government support for the 9/11 hijacking is “very disturbing,” and that “the real question is whether it was sanctioned at the royal-family level or beneath that, and whether these leads were followed through.” Now, in a rare example of bipartisanship, Jones and Lynch have co-sponsored a resolution requesting that the Obama Administration declassify the pages.  More

 

PATRICK COCKBURN: Isis 'cannot be beaten' as long as there is civil war in Syria

There is a bizarre section in Mr Obama’s speech in which he says “we must strengthen the [Syrian] opposition as the best counterweight to extremists like Isil [Isis]”. The only way that this could be done would be to raise a mercenary army and pretend it is the Free Syrian Army reborn or, something that Saudi Arabia and Qatar have done in the past, pretend that jihadi groups whose ideology is the same as that of Isis nevertheless belong to the moderate camp. The missing element in the Obama plan is the creation of the framework for new peace negotiations between Mr Assad’s government and the moderate opposition such as it is. The Geneva 11 talks got nowhere because Washington insisted that the only topic of negotiations should be the departure of Mr Assad. Since he controlled most of Syria this was not going to happen, so in practice US and British policy was a recipe for an endless war… In Iraq the political and military reach of Isis is limited by the fact that the Sunni Arabs are only a fifth of the population, but in Syria they are three-fifths. Their natural constituency is much greater than in Iraq.  More

 

http://www.truthdig.com/images/made/images/cartoonuploads/132877_600_590_446.jpegU.S. Pins Hope on Syrian Rebels With Dubious Alliances

After more than three years of civil war, there are hundreds of militias fighting President Bashar al-Assad — and one another. Among them, even the more secular forces have turned to Islamists for support and weapons over the years, and the remaining moderate rebels often fight alongside extremists like the Nusra Front, Al Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria. “You are not going to find this neat, clean, secular rebel group that respects human rights and that is waiting and ready because they don’t exist,” said Aron Lund, a Syria analyst who edits the Syria in Crisis blog for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace... Analysts who track the rebel movement say that the concept of the Free Syrian Army as a unified force with an effective command structure is a myth… Even as they line up to support Mr. Obama’s strategy against ISIS, some European allies remain skeptical about the efficacy of arming the Syrian rebels. Germany, for instance, has been arming and training Kurdish pesh merga forces in Iraq, but has resisted doing the same for any groups in Syria — partly out of fear that the weapons could end up in the hands of ISIS or other radical groups.  More

 

 

Sotloff Family Spokesman: Syria’s ‘So-Called Moderate Rebels’ Sold Sotloff To ISIS

A spokesman for the family of murdered journalist Steven Sotloff claimed Monday night that Sotloff was sold to the terrorist group the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) by Syria’s “so-called moderate rebels.” …“We believe that these so-called moderate rebels that people want our administration to support, one of them sold him probably for something between $25,000 and $50,000 to ISIS and that was the reason he was captured,” Barfi said.  More

 

Report: Islamic State got anti-tank weapons from “moderate” Syrian rebels

Anti-tank weapons that were likely once owned by moderate Syrian rebels have landed in the hands of Islamic State militants, according to a newly released field investigation conducted in both northern Iraq and Syria. The Islamic State has also captured “significant quantities” of U.S.-manufactured small arms and has employed them on the battlefield, researchers found… The most powerful weapons documented were the two 90mm Yugoslav anti-tank rocket launchers, known as “Osas,” which resembled rockets that were transferred to moderate Syrian rebels, reportedly by Saudi Arabia last year. It is purportedly shown in this video in the hands of a Free Syrian Army rebel last year: The 25-pound rocket launchers have appeared in numerous battlefield videos shot in Syria and Iraq and were believed to be in Islamic State hands. But the new research marks the first time they have been physically documented.  More

 

In Congress, Islamic State takes pressure off Iran

Remember Iran? The dominant foreign policy issue of the past year has fallen by the wayside as Congress focuses on the rise of the Islamic State (IS). Republicans who just months ago vowed to use every tool at their disposal to force a vote on new sanctions in the Senate have shelved those plans, and even the GOP-controlled House isn't scheduled to hold a single hearing before the midterm elections. The shift in focus has given President Barack Obama's negotiating team welcome breathing room as it pursues a nuclear deal in Vienna, even as congressional skeptics fret that Iran will take advantage of the lull in attention. "The negotiators need the room to work," said Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations panel on the Near East. "And I think maybe a little bit less pushing and pulling from this angle may help that work be done."

Republicans aren't nearly as sanguine.  More

 

Israel concerned ISIS threat may distract Obama from Iran

A senior political source told Ynet on Thursday night there was concern over the possibility that the US will moderate its pressure on Iran in the talks. A senior minister familiar with the issue said that "we are actually concerned about that possibility."  Sources in Israel said that the US has attempted to alleviate Jerusalem's concerns in recent months, promising that their policy towards Iran will not change. But Jerusalem is not convinced, especially given that only this week Obama cited the Islamic State as the biggest threat to the Middle East – and not Iran. More

 
“Workers of The World Unite, You Have Nothing To Lose But Your Chains”-The Struggle For Trotsky's Fourth (Communist) International-From The Archives-Founding Conference of the Fourth International-1938

 


 
Markin comment (repost from September 2010 slightly edited):

Several years ago, when the question of an international, a new workers international, a fifth international, was broached by the International Marxist Tendency (IMT), faintly echoing the call issued during the presidency of the late Venezuelan caudillo, Hugo Chavez, I got to thinking a little bit more on the subject. Moreover, it must have been something in the air at the time (maybe caused by these global climatic changes that are hazarding our collective future) because I had  also seen a spade of then recent commentary on the need to go back to something that looked very much like Karl Marx’s one-size-fits-all First International. Of course in the 21st century, after over one hundred and fifty years of attempts to create adequate international working-class organizations, just what the doctor by all means, be my guest, but only if the shades of Proudhon and Bakunin can join. Boys and girls that First International was disbanded in the wake of the demise of the Paris Commune for a reason, okay. Mixing political banners (Marxism and fifty-seven varieties of anarchism) was appropriate to a united front, not a hell-bent revolutionary International fighting, and fighting hard, for our communist future. Forward

The Second International, for those six, no seven, people who might care, is still alive and well (at least for periodic international conferences) as a mail-drop for homeless social democrats who want to maintain a fig leaf of internationalism without having to do much about it. Needless to say, one Joseph Stalin and his cohorts liquidated the Communist (Third) International in 1943, long after it turned from a revolutionary headquarters into an outpost of Soviet foreign policy. By then no revolutionary missed its demise, nor shed a tear goodbye. And of course there are always a million commentaries by groups, cults, leagues, tendencies, etc. claiming to stand in the tradition (although, rarely, the program) of the Leon Trotsky-inspired Fourth International that, logically and programmatically, is the starting point of any discussion of the modern struggle for a new communist international.

With that caveat in mind this month, the September American Labor Day month, but more importantly the month in 1938 that the ill-fated Fourth International was founded I am posting some documents around the history of that formation, and its program, the program known by the shorthand, Transitional Program. If you want to call for a fifth, sixth, seventh, what have you, revolutionary international, and you are serious about it beyond the "mail-drop" potential, then you have to look seriously into that organization's origins, and the world-class Bolshevik revolutionary who inspired it. Forward. 
 **************

Founding Conference of the

Fourth International

1938


Resolution On The Work Of The Canadian Section

1. The All American and Pacific Preconference, having heard the report of the Canadian delegates, welcomes the successful fusion of the majority comrades with the active nucleus of the minority on the basis of the program of action agreed upon during the Chicago Convention.
2. The Preconference endorses the action taken by the Canadian comrades in forming an open Socialist Policy Group in the CCF [Cooperative Commonwealth Federation] 146 on the basis of a declaration on the war question.
3. The Preconference, after discussion with the Canadian delegates, suggests the following plan of action for the immediate future:
(a) The Canadian comrades should continue to concentrate their main efforts on work within the CCF, with a view to climaxing their activities by a complete programmatic and political fight at or around the national fall convention of the CCF, with a perspective of completing the experience within this declining reformist organization and reestablishing the Canadian section of the Fourth International.
The declining membership and activity of the CCF has increased the specific weight of the petty bourgeois elements and the corresponding entrenchment of a right wing bureaucracy. While our general line is oriented toward an early establishment of an independent Canadian section of the Fourth International, this does not preclude the possibility of continued concerted work in the CCF, in provinces where the objective conditions are more favorable than in Ontario.
(b) The comrades should endeavor to further strengthen our own fraction within the CCF and the group by systematic education and concerted and disciplined action in every field of their activity. The Socialist Policy Group will undoubtedly attract some confused centrist elements who, in a later stage, especially at the moment of split, may oppose our program. Consequently it is of great importance to combine educative work upon our new recruits with revolutionary vigilance against centrism.
(c) The comrades should make immediate attempts to extend the Socialist Policy Group into a national tendency within the CCF, by establishing the cooperation of our comrades in Vancouver, Winnipeg, and elsewhere.
(d) The comrades should elaborate the political documents of the SPG so as to create a thorough line of demarcation between the reformists, the centrists, and themselves on every important national and international problem.
(e) The conference expresses the firm belief that this activity should be expressed through a regular mimeographed or printed organ (appearing weekly or fortnightly) rather than through casual bulletins. A name should be chosen for the organ which can also be used later for the organ of an independent organization, so as to continue the tradition of our revolutionary fight within the CCF. The Vancouver comrades should be invited to collaborate in the creation of such an organ.
(f) In view of a possible premature organizational attack by the CCF bureaucracy, our comrades should be ready to answer every organizational maneuver by energetic politicizing of the issues in order that a full principled record of our position may be established. The experience of our French, Belgian, and American comrades can be studied in this connection.
4. It is most likely that the reestablishment of our comrades in an independent organization will not occur with sufficient forces to make possible the immediate creation of a party, but rather only a broadened propaganda group. Preparatory steps for the new activity of this group should be taken even now.
(a) By systematizing and extending our trade union work, to be carried out with firm democratic centralism and comradely collaboration between the executive and the trade union activists.
(b) In view of the existing ferment within the Stalinist ranks, efforts should be made to establish contacts within their organization for the purposes of information and, if possible, organizational fraction work. The new organ of the SPG should carry on a steady and vigorous campaign against Stalinism both as it appears within the CCF and without. The possibilities of public meetings against the Stalinists should also be considered, in exploiting the “democracy” of the CCF constitution to its absolute limits.
(c) Concerning the Field group,’47 the Preconference considers that any political negotiations with this group should take place only on the basis of an uncompromising stand on the principles and platform of the Fourth International. While our political discussions with the CCF members need be conducted in a spirit of patient education, the purpose of any action concerning the fossilized sectarian Field group should be that of splitting away progressive elements and rendering the group powerless. The progress of our work within the CCF, and the subsequent reestablishment of an independent group, together with the formal foundation of the Fourth International at the coming European conference, will establish our comrades on firm ground for gaining any progressive elements in the Field group through an energetic political attack against their sterility and international isolation. While the necessity of occasional united front action is not precluded, it should not be extended to a degree where the leadership of this stagnating group gains fictitious prestige.
5. Concerning the possible development of the Labor Relations Association, the Preconference suggests that further information be prepared and that discussions be held in Canada as well as in New York so that a definite position may be taken. The same procedure should be followed in estimating the possibilities of applying to Canadian conditions a program of action arising out of the international thesis (Death Agony of Capitalism) adopted by the American section at its last (April) National Committee plenum.