For the People's World
Coke’s Colombian victims and their union
By W. T. Whitney Jr.
797 words
A corporation currently ranking 32nd in the
world for market value and accumulating $7.1 billion in profits
in a recent year for decades has abused and even killed workers who want better
lives. Coca Cola, the Goliath in this Colombian story, has had to contend with
the Sinaltranail food and beverage workers’ union that, as David, defends the
Coca Cola workers.
On June 25, 2015 thugs killed retired Coca Cola worker Wilmer
Enrique Giraldo. Wilmer had been injured at work, was forced from his job,
received death threats, and fled in fear to Medellin. Luis Enrique Girado Arango, his father,
also worked
for Coca Cola and also belonged to Sinaltrainal. Paramilitaries assassinated
Luis Enrique Girado in 1994.
The 14 murders of Sinaltranail’s Coca Cola workers since
1990 represent a tiny fraction of the 2800 murders of Colombian unionists
occurring between 1984 and 2011. In addition during those years, tens of
thousands of other social movement activists and protesters met violent deaths.
The 105 Colombian unionists killed between
2011 and the present are of special significance. During that time the Labor Action Plan of the U. S. –
Colombian Free Trade Agreement has been in force. The Plan was a U. S. -
inspired effort “to stop violence against unionists,” according to a Colombian NGO.
Sinaltranail defends employees of
Nestle
Corporation, Nutresa,
and other Colombian companies in addition to Coca Cola. But the fight against
huge and famous Coca Cola is special, inasmuch as that corporation exemplifies
transnational corporations receiving support and protection from Colombia’s
neo-liberal government.
This is a big-league contest. Coca Cola in Colombia teams with the
giant Mexican food and beverage distributer FEMSA. Coca Cola claimed almost 50
million consumers there in 2013, 5000 employees, and “413,200 Points of Sale.” In fact, “Colombia made up 47.1 million (15%) of
Coca-Cola’s 313.7
million drinkers of the soft drink in Latin America and the Philippines.” Unfortunately
from the union’s point of view, Coca Cola farms out most of its workers to
subcontracted “facade companies.”
Sinaltranail has resisted the company’s
firing of new recruits and its refusal to relocate workers who’ve received
threats of violence. The union defends workers from intimidation at the hands of
private security firms and from real danger posed by militarized police attacks against striking
workers, in one instance with tanks. Over the years Coca Cola has used
paramilitary forces as its ultimate enforcer, not only as murderer, but once as
the means for forcing workers out of the union by entering a bottling plant.
Sinaltrainal has advocated for
the environment, notably in early 2015 when it protested Coca Cola’s having
diverted almost 70 percent of Tocancipá’s underground water supplies to its
plant there.
Beginning on April 13, 2015, five Sinaltrainal Coca Cola
workers carried out a hunger strike for ten days in Bogota’s Plaza Bolivar.
Acting for Coca Cola workers nationwide, they were protesting low wages, Coca
Cola’s sub-contracting for workers, its firing of 1500 workers at a closed –
down bottling plant, and abuse of water resources. The hunger strike ended with
an agreement on establishing a review board to monitor water use and deal with
environmental abuses. News reports
indicated that remaining issues, like
wages and sub-contracting, would be
discussed later.
On May 22, 2015, Coca Cola service workers
belonging to Sinaltranail chained themselves to Coca Cola factory entry ways in
Cúcuta, Bucaramanga,
Barrancabermeja, Cali, Medellín, and Barranquilla. They were reiterating demands
made a month earlier.
In this fight against long odds, Sinaltranail has gained
international solidarity. The United Steelworkers of America and the
International Labor Rights Forum filed lawsuits in the United States in 2001 and
2006. The charge, which did not prevail, was that Coca Cola in Colombia
"contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that
utilized extreme violence and murdered, tortured and unlawfully detained or
otherwise silenced trade union
leaders."
In a 2012 letter to President Obama, AFL-CIO
President Richard Trumka expressed his "profound shock" at the murder of a Coca
Cola worker and Sinaltranail leader in Barranquilla. Alleging that Coca Cola is “complicit in
violence against union leaders in Latin America, particularly Colombia and
Guatemala,” the American Federation of Teachers in late 2014 resolved to ban
Coca Cola products in schools. Since 2004, dozens of union locals and state and
central labor councils have issued similar statements. The American Postal
Workers Union, Communications Workers of America, International Longshore and
Warehouse Union, and Service Employees International Union have done likewise.
Yet the struggle continues and
the stakes are high. Or in the words of Sinaltranail leader Juan Carlos Galvis:
“If we lose this fight against
Coke, first we will lose our union, next we will lose our jobs, and then we will
all lose our
lives!"
