Thursday, April 13, 2017

The Ghost Of Delores Landon (nee Riley)-A Si Landon Story

The Ghost Of Delores Landon (nee Riley)-A Si Landon Story  

By Zack James

[The Pete Markin mentioned in the sketch below is the late Peter Paul Markin who despite a lot of serious work as a journalist back in the early 1970s fell off the wagon down south of the border and fell down shot dead with a couple of slugs in some desolate back alley in Sonora after a busted drug deal as far as anybody in America was able to find out. The Peter Markin who moderates this site is a pseudonym for a guy, Frank Jackman, who along with Si Landon, Jack Callahan, Frankie Riley, Josh Breslin and a bunch of other guys knew Markin in the old days and has taken the pseudonym in honor of his fallen comrade who before his untimely end taught him a lot about the world and its ways. “Peter Paul Markin”]          


Si Landon like a lot of guys, gals too, but this is about guys from his now creeping aging generation, a generation a guy, Pete Markin  who hung around with Si in the old days, the old high school days around North Adamsville where they grew up called the “generation of ‘68” because that seemed to have been the watershed year in the explosive 1960s which they all had been  washed by, washed clean by at least for a while, was a man of hard-bitten memory. Had remembered whatever needed to be remembered when called upon by the surviving members of the tribe, the corner boys they called themselves back in the late 1950s, early 1960s when everybody, every professional everybody from teachers and the cops to the Governor was trying to figure out why ordinary growing up working class guys were so sullen, so “alienated” was the term most frequently used, from what has been called the golden age of the American working class and its progeny. Had despite drifting away from the old crowd more than most in the recent past had that “remembering” gene activated big time after a period of dormancy.      

Si was, according to Frankie Riley, who was anointed the leader of the leaderless corner boys who hung around the corner of Doc’s Drugstore up on Sudbury Street near the Josiah Adams School (the town was named after this head of an illustrious ship-building family who had help settle the town back, way back, when religious dissenters, dissenters from orthodox Puritanism, were not welcomed in Boston) something of a loner. A guy who was genial enough on those awkward Friday and Saturday nights when they shared their individual alienations collectively, but more inclined than anybody to brood endlessly and walk alone along the existential beaches that dotted the old town. So it had been no surprise that he was the first to leave the group, drift away would probably be a better way to put it, once they graduated from hallowed North Adamsville High School.        

What the corner boys, what anybody who came in contact with Si back then, did not know was that Si’s family life was something like a living hell on a day to day basis. The only one who did have an inkling was that same Markin mentioned up in the brackets whom Si would confide in when things got really bad and he had to stay over at Markin’s house when he for the umpteenth time got kicked out of his family house for some schoolboy misbehavior. Si would tell the others, tell the lie, the big lie, that he had walked out of the   
house, had decided to seek the next best thing, had decided to seek a newer world a term he learned from a poem by Alfred Lord Tennyson that he had read in English class in school and then a few days later would be seen coming out of the family house. You get the drift.   

The cause of Si’s constant anguish had a name, had a name to be conjured with. Delores Landon nee Riley the latter surname reflecting the overwhelmingly Irish “Acre” neighborhood where Si and about three prior generations of Rileys had grown up, some to prosper others like the Landons to suffer the slings and arrows of misfortune since Delores had not only married outside the neighborhood, outside the religion, outside the Irish diaspora, a decided no-no, but had married what the whole clan had determined was beneath her status as lace curtain progeny. Had married Si’s father, a southern redneck transported by fate, and world politics, World War II-style, to finish up his time as a Marine at the well-known Riverdale Naval Depot and the rest was history, family history mostly kept under the rug. That rug referring to a neighborhood steeped in the tradition of not “airing the family business in public,” of keeping closed-mouth about what was going on inside the house (or inside the brain). Si’s father Lawrence was nothing but a high school drop-out whose lack of skills and education would be the torment of one Delores Landon once the reality of that teenage marriage and the five subsequent children, all boys, sunk in.     

Moreover it did not help that Si was the oldest of the lot and therefore bore the brunt of Delores’ unspoken anger at her situation. Unspoken to anybody but Si upon whom it came out as continual carping and belittling from the time that the last, mercifully the last, of the Landon siblings were born. The anger, the righteous Delores anger came out in little ways and large. Little by the constant pressure on Si to act beyond his years as a secondary father figure to the younger boys. Any variation, any trouble that normal Acre boys got into without much damage got magnified way out of proportion in screaming matches that while they were held in private could be heard all the way to Adamsville proper. An example, small but one that the great rememberer would brood about even fifty years later. 

In fifth grade at a time in the neighborhood where boys and girls started to see each other as interesting rather than as something to be avoided like the plague Si had been sweet on one Rosalind Lahey, a born heartbreaker as would later prove to be the case but just then the focal point of his un-channeled lust. As things went in school life then Miss Willow had planned a dance exhibition to show parents what little well-versed social creatures their off-spring had turned into. As blind fate would have it the dance exhibition was about square dancing which Miss Willow had spent several months trying to teach her charges. As double fate would have it Si was to be paired with Rosalind. So Si thought it natural when Miss Willow told the class that they should make an effort to dress up as country folk, farmers to do something to impress Rosalind. That was when overheated brain Si decided that if he cut up the bottoms of the one of two pairs of dungarees to his name that he would impress the lady Rosalind. He did so as it turned out before the exhibition and before the parents arrived including Delores Landon (Lawrence was trying to hold onto for dear life a nighttime extra pay job and so could not attend which was probably just as well).           

Things were okay until the dancing squares were formed and somehow Delores spotted what Si had done to his pants and let out a blood-curdling cry against her son. Said right there in public so you know that it was a bad time how could Si disgrace and disrespect his parents meager hold on reality and cut  up one of his only two pairs of pants which moreover were slated to be handed down soon to the next oldest boy, Norman. Needless to say that was the end of any “romance” with the fickle Rosalind. But that was not the worst of it for he was grounded for the next two weeks and the subject of the “belt” from his father. Even that was not the worse since for about the next four years until something more serious replaced it in Delores ammunition dump of grievances Si and whoever else was around the hearth got an earful about Si’s rotten deed.

That event four years later would set up what would be an on-going battle between mother and son for the next forty years or so until she passed away. (Si would be estranged for longer and shorter periods from high school onward and would not even attend Delores’ funeral so you know how bad the blood between them had been.) The simple fact was that Delores between her young age at marriage and on-going health problems from complications in a couple of her deliveries coupled with extreme economic distress for most of Si’s time at the family house was in way over her head whatever love she had, and it was untiring devoted love, for Lawrence Landon. (Si would regale his corner boys with his stories about that extreme economic distress-long-hand for the weekly “envelopes”-the envelopes which sat on the kitchen table every Thursday payday for the various bill collectors one at least each week would be empty and the stall would be on for a week’s reprieve. When things got really bad the envelopes were all “short.” Si dearly knew those weeks because those would be the weeks when he from about age six to twelve after which he refused to do the arduous chore anymore and it was farmed out to his brother Norman had to go with the envelope to the landlord and look very sheepish, very sheepish with the “tide over until good times” short money. Little did Si know then that in “don’t air your dirty linen in public” Acre that his corner boys could have retailed the same kind of stories.       

That inability of Delores to do anything more than rant and rave at Si in her frustration combined with that economic distress which the late Pete Markin called the “wanting habits” the whole crowd suffered from left him with very few outlets for his own anger. Made him very malleable when it came to any kind of ways to grab some dough or to do some other misadventure. That misadventure part happened one night when Si had just turned sixteen and he and a few corner boys, he would not mention any names, still wouldn’t almost fifty years later, when he was the only one caught, had “hot-wired” a 1959 Chevy and went joy-riding down the causeway one hot summer night. Problem: Si had no driver’s license when he crashed into a stone wall and the others fled leaving him to face the inevitable coppers alone. Fortunately the guy whose car was stolen had adequate insurance to cover the damage but Si wound up with six months’ probation in “juvvy.”

That was the straw that broke the camel’s back for Delores and was the very first of an untold number of kicks out of the house (Si always disputed whether he was kicked out or had left of his own volition on each occasion including the last serious one when he left the house for good never to return to stay, never.)  That was the way things went for the next forty years as was already mentioned with longer and longer periods between temporary reconciliations. The main thrust of the battles royals was that Si was some version of the devil incarnate which Delores was made to suffer against some unknown offense against the church, the church being the holy apostolic Roman Catholic Church which was the only serious religious expression in the Acre dominated by the Irish and the Italians.      

Here’s the funny thing in the long haul which will make the story sort of byzantine. Si would go on to be a fairly successful lawyer in Boston although Delores refused to recognize that accomplishment. She would dwell on the more mundane fact of his three unsuccessful marriage, no that is not right, she would have known only about two of them but the three unsuccessful marriages is right and the failure of that third one is what brings us back to the ghost of Delores Landon. A few months before, maybe six months, his third wife, Maria, had given Si his walking papers. Had told him that between his eternal moodiness and withdrawal and her own need to “find herself” they were done as a couple after nearly a decade of marriage. (Delores had always hated Maria since she was “one of those,” a heathen, a bloody Protestant, English to boot, forgetting, conveniently forgetting, that the late Lawrence Landon, the love of her life, had been a Southern Baptist before he converted after agreeing to raise the children as Catholics when they were married. Married not in the church because he was a Protestant but in the rectory by the parish priest who from all accounts was not pleased to perform the ceremony.)         

The immediate effect of their separation was that Maria would stay in the marriage house for the sake of the children and that “rolling stone” Si would go fend for himself someplace. Initially he had taken a sublet from a friend’s daughter who was heading to Europe for six months. When that six months was up, actually before that six months was up Si decided once it was finally very clear that Maria was not going to attempt any sort of reconciliation that he needed some feeling of rootedness, some grounding after all the years of feeling out of sorts, feeling like some silly alienated youth which he found that he never really grew out of. So he decided to go back to the old town, old North Adamsville. Since he was not up for buying a condo he had decided to rent one for a year and see if that helped his situation. He eventually found a place not far from where he had grown up. The place had been an old elementary schoolhouse which had been several years before due to changes in the demographics of the neighborhood and its ethnic composition closed down, sold and converted to condos.       

Although Si had not gone to the school, Adams, named after that same Josiah who was a big wheel in shipbuilding in the town’s more prosperous days, since he had gone to elementary school across town at the Harbor school, three of his younger brothers had and so he thought it ironic that “what goes around, comes around.” He did not think much more about the matter until he moved into his new rental, his condo. Of course converting an old school into individual units was no big deal just reconfigure the old classrooms. What the converters had done though was to keep some of the flavor of the old school in the main foyer by preserving various aspects of the school when it was functioning as such. One of the things that they had done was to place many of the early graduating classes on the walls. Si still didn’t think much of the matter until he noticed a newspaper article in the North Adamsville Gazette announcing the opening of the school in 1925. Damn.

The school was located only a block from where Delores had grown up and so she would have gone to elementary school there in the early 1930s. And sure enough when he perused the various class pictures from the early 1930s there among the Class of 1931 was one Delores Riley. Si freaked. A few nights later when he was a little restless not about his discovery but about the finality of the split with Maria he thought he heard a voice, a shrill voice calling out that he would never amount to anything. Probably just the wind gusting outside but he shuddered to think that he would have to live with the “ghost” of Delores Landon for the duration. Double Damn.       

  

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Smedley Stand-out to Stop Trump’s “Death Budget” Saturday, April 15 Noon – 1:00 p.m. Harvard Square


Smedley Stand-out to Stop Trump’s “Death Budget”
Saturday, April 15  Noon – 1:00 p.m.
Harvard Square

Smedleys and Friends,

Last night at our monthly meeting the Smedleys decided to do a one hour stand-out this coming Saturday to oppose the Trump regime’s military budget and especially its $54 billion increase. 

This stand-out will be just Smedleys with VFP flags flying so long as there’s participation by at least a dozen members.  Eight folks signed up last night, so obviously we’re looking for more commitments.  If you can join us please let us know asap by replying to vfpsmedley@gmail.com.

Hoping to see many more than a dozen of you this Saturday.

The Exec. Committee

P.S.  When our stand-out ends we’re planning on marching all of about one block to the Cambridge Commons to join with a much larger Tax Day 2017 Mobilization that starts at 1:00 p.m.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SmedleyVFP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Smedleyvfp+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Report from Global Network 25th Annual Meeting in Alabama

1 attachment
 
red1
 
It turned out to be a long hard trip to Huntsville, Alabama for last weekend's Global Network 25th annual space organizing protest and conference.

Three of us from Maine were scheduled to fly from Boston on Thursday, April 6 in order to make it in time to get things ready for a very full weekend of events.  One in our group, Jason Rawn, actually got there as planned as his plane left on time and he arrived in Huntsville nearly on schedule.

But due to major storms in Washington DC and Atlanta there was a national disruption of the airline schedules across the nation.  (We heard Delta cancelled 300 flights.) Eric Herter and I sat inside our plane on the runway in Boston for two and one-half hours waiting to take off but the flight was eventually cancelled.  We were told to retrieve our bags at baggage claim - Eric got his but my suitcase, full of banners and supplies for the conference, was nowhere to be found.

Mary Beth Sullivan was to fly to Huntsville the next day but when she heard about our cancelled flight she immediately took a bus to Boston and met Eric and me at the airport.  By then we had decided that the only way we were going to make it to Huntsville in time for the conference would be to rent a car and drive all night heading south to Alabama.  We took turns driving and resting in the back seat of the rental car for what turned out to be a 20 hour journey.

I had decided to go to Huntsville a day early because conference attendees were planning to begin arriving on Thursday and I was going to pick them up at the airport and get them booked into the hotel where we were staying.  But now that we were driving we had to make other arrangements from the road.

Thankfully Jason got there on time so he rented a car and began looking for those who needed to be picked up.  However, we soon realized that others coming to Alabama on flights from around the country were facing the same flight delays and/or cancellations that we had faced in Boston.  So all of the work I had done to create schedules for pick-up and hotel room pairings were thrown to the winds.

Our Boston rental car crew of three arrived at the Huntsville hotel just an hour before our scheduled news conference that would review for the local media our weekend plans.  But first I was in serious need of a shower.  My bag had not yet been found so a local man loaned me a clean shirt.
 
Soon thereafter people began to arrive in greater numbers from across the nation - including delegations of Veterans For Peace particularly from Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee.  We loaded up our vehicles and made our way to the gate of the Army's Redstone Arsenal for a 4:00-5:30  peace protest as those working for the Army and NASA left work.  There was a steady stream of cars for that 90 minute period and I was quite surprised at the lack of hostility from those driving by.  I expected a strong negative reception and in fact we got a surprising numbers of waves and toots as cars zoomed by.
 
Inside of my suitcase was a bag full of Global Network space banners that we were going to use at this protest but because the bag was lost we had to make due with a smattering of other signs that people brought along.  Still the event went well and we had a nice closing circle with the 50 people who gathered at the gates.  The place was crawling with media and we were pleased with the photo coverage we got from the Huntsville Times newspaper which you can see here.

One local space center employee told us that NASA had sent an email to all those working inside Redstone Arsenal informing them that we would be protesting.  It was nice to hear that NASA had helped us by informing the workers which I am certain created some level of discussion about our protest even before we had arrived.  I experienced similar situations during my time in the Air Force at Travis AFB, California during the Vietnam War when base authorities would warn us about weekend protests outside our gates - this always insured intense anti-war dialogue inside the barracks, the chow hall, and at our work sites.
 
By the time our conference began early Saturday morning we had heard from three speakers (Guam, Norway, New York City) who were not going to be able to make the event due to cancelled flights.  In spite of that, the conference went very well and the venue inside the Flying Monkey Theater was a perfect fit for us.  There was plenty of room for literature tables, for serving food and for comfortable seating for those who attended.

We were thrilled to have a three-person delegation from the current NO THAAD speaking tour across the US join us for the conference. Rev. Seonghye Kim (Co-chair Seongju Struggle Committee to Stop THAAD Deployment, South Korea) made an excellent presentation as she brought their important struggle to us.
 
Saturday's conference ended in spectacular fashion with the Huntsville Feminist Chorus performing for us.  They got such a great response that they did an encore - their rendition of Finlandia brought tears to our eyes.
 
On Sunday we took conference attendees to the Space and Rocket Museum which was loaded with families and their children.  It was important for conference attendees to see how the coming generations are being indoctrinated to support 'everything space'.  Space technology controls and directs everything the 'warfighter' does these days but these systems are massively expensive.  Thus the need to have a thorough brainwashing program in place to help steer the unsuspecting public to give up social progress to pay for the dazzle and flash of military space technology.
 
My suitcase finally arrived at the hotel in Huntsville the night before the conference was over.  When I opened it I found a card from Homeland Security saying that had performed a 'routine check' of the bag.  Everything had been turned up-side-down.  The plastic bag with the protest banners that we were going to use at Redstone Arsenal had been ripped open and was tossed back onto the top of the disheveled contents.  I can't help but wonder if my bag was sent off on its own delayed journey in order to make sure that I could not have what I needed for our events.

On Sunday morning the group gathered at the hotel to review and evaluate the weekend events.  People learned a lot from each other and they enjoyed the diverse community of interesting folks who had made the trip to help bring a peace witness and presence to such a vital place in the military industrial complex's growing web of space warfare bases now positioned around the planet.

The members agreed that we should invite Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran Will Griffin (Georgia) to serve on our board of directors.  Will helped quite a bit to organize and promote the gathering and did the welcome speech to the assembled on Saturday morning.

It was also agreed that our 2018 conference would be held in England - either at an expanding US surveillance base called Croughton (near Oxford) or at the Menwith Hill US NSA spy base in Yorkshire.  That decision will be left to our friends in England to make.  It was also decided to hold our 2019 annual conference here in Bath, Maine.

Special thanks go to a handful of local peaceniks in the Huntsville area who really extended themselves to help us in every way possible before and during the weekend events.  We could not have pulled this event off without them and it must be said that living in Huntsville and doing peace work is not an easy task so their efforts on our behalf were even more impressive.
 
Thanks as well to all those who traveled to Huntsville to join the conference from as far away as India, Nepal, England, Sweden, Japan and South Korea and from every corner of the US.

A series of videos of most of the conference proceedings are available here
 
Bruce K. Gagnon
Coordinator
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
http://www.space4peace.org 
http://space4peace.blogspot.com  (blog)

Thank God men cannot fly, and lay waste the sky as well as the earth. - Henry David Thoreau

In Boston-4/18 Black Lives in Cuba Today

*Black Lives in Cuba Today*

Kimbo (Raúl Domínguez Valdés) is an AfroCuban, who is a leader of Barrio
La Marina, a largely AfroCuban neighborhood in Matanzas, Cuba. In that
role, he establishes relationships, working with people in his community
to help them solve their daily life problems, connecting them with
government agencies if appropriate. He has also started a yearly
carnival cultural festival, focusing on the rhumba music and dance and
dress in Matanzas. This celebration has been a vital aspect of Barrio La
Marina’s cohesiveness. His community organizing involves issues
surrounding Black Lives in Cuba today.

Tues. April 18th 7 PM

Mel King's South End Technology Center
359 Columbus Ave. Boston (near Back Bay Station T)
Please RSVP to info@july26.org for this event, we need to make sure we
don't overflow the room capacity. (We have an alternate location nearby
if demand is higher than expected.)

_______________________________________________
Act-MA mailing list
Act-MA@act-ma.org
http://act-ma.org/mailman/listinfo/act-ma_act-ma.org
To set options or unsubscribe
http://act-ma.org/mailman/options/act-ma_act-ma.org

Smedley Stand-out in support of Cambridge Friends Meeting Sunday, April 16 11:00 -12:00


Smedley Stand-out in support of Cambridge Friends Meeting 
Sunday, April 16  11:00 -12:00
Textron, 201 Lowell St. (Route 129) Wilmington MA, one mile west of Interstate 93, Exit 38
 
Smedleys,
Textron discontinued cluster bomb production last month.  For the past seven years Cambridge Friends Meeting  has held a monthly silent prayer vigil at Textron's Wilmington facility and this coming Sunday (yes Easter) will be their last. 
Textron is at 201 Lowell St. on the south side of the street.    Across the street at 226 Lowell St. there is plenty  of parking.   Quakers will set up two rows of facing chairs on the sidewalk in front of Textron for an hour of silent prayer.  Smedleys with flags flying (Forecast: wind 14 mph, 81 degrees, partly cloudy)  can stand in silent vigil along the sidewalk at a modest distance.
Hopefully there will be at least half a dozen interested  Smedleys.   If you can join please let Phil Noyce know to be sure he brings enough flags.  phil@macafrica.com  or 978-275-9830.

Textron Sensor Fused Weapons:
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SmedleyVFP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Smedleyvfp+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

April 13: David Swanson on U.S. Never-Ending War in the Time of Trump and How to Stop It

U.S. Never-Ending War in the Time of Trump and How to Stop It

When: Thursday, April 13, 2017, 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm

Where: Friends Meeting House • 5 Longfellow Park • Cambridge

Presentation by David Swanson followed by discussion and book signing.

<http://justicewithpeace.org/sites/default/files/files/u414/david_swanson.png>

David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is director of <http://worldbeyondwar.org/> WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for <http://rootsaction.org/> RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include <http://warisalie.org/> War <http://warisalie.org/> Is A Lie. He blogs at <http://davidswanson.org/> DavidSwanson.org and <http://warisacrime.org/> WarIsACrime.org. He hosts <http://davidswanson.org/taxonomy/term/41> Talk Nation Radio. He is a 2015, 2016, 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.

<http://davidswanson.org/warisalie> War Is A Lie: Second Edition(2016) -- widely praised best-selling classic. "WAR IS A LIE is a thorough refutation of every major argument used to justify wars, drawing on evidence from numerous past wars, with a focus on those wars that have been most widely defended as just and good. This is a handbook of sorts, a manual to be used in debunking future lies before future wars have a chance to begin.

Thursday, April 13, 7:00 PM
Friends Meeting at Cambridge
5 Longfellow Park
Cambridge, MA 02138

Boston Socialist Unity Project Conference 2017, 4/21-22

Boston Socialist Unity Project Conference 2017
Friday Evening & Saturday, April 21st  & 22nd @ MIT
BostonSocialistUnity.org || Facebook Event

The 2nd annual Boston Socialist Unity Project Conference (BSUP2) is a powerhouse of ideas and organizing!

The opening night event features Barbara Madeloni (Union President, Massachusetts Teachers Association) and Eugene Puryear (Millions for Prisoners). Boston’s own Foundation Movement, conscious hip hop artists, open the evening and Swiss-based Mat Callahan and Yvonne Moore bring Irish revolutionary songs to the closing. [Friday, April 21, 2017 @ 7:00 p.m.MIT Building 34-10150 Vassar Street]

On Saturday (9-5 pm) Sherri Mitchell (Land Peace Foundation) and Fred Magdoff (University of Vermont) connect indigenous organizing and environmental movements with the struggles to get beyond capitalism and build socialist movements. Our lunchtime plenary presents political strategies for challenging the system: it features the Democratic Socialists of America, the Green-Rainbow Party,Our Revolution, and the Socialist Party (list in formation).
With recent US armed action in Syria, Vijay Prashad’s closing plenary speech on Imperialism could not be more important and timely!

Two sessions of five to six participatory workshops will showcase movement-building work and feature many of our plenary speakers (Mitchell, Magdoff, Prashad, and Puryear). It will also draw in some of the most important and exemplary movement work being performed by City Life/Vida Urbana, the Freedom Road Socialist Organization, the Boston Institute for Non-Profit Journalism, MIT’s Student Activist Coalition, and Socialists on Single-Payer. Their topics include indigenous organizing and solidarity, housing and the city, education, media organizing, building movements for racial justice, the peace movement, and imperialism.

Breakfast and lunch options available with MIT vendors, Food for Activists, and Food Not Bombs.

Everyone is welcome, $10 suggested donation (online); nobody turned away for lack of funds.
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BostonUNAC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bostonunac+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance!

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance! 

Frank Jackman comment; 

We can be all over the place on our opinions about what is happening in Syria-who to support-or not support- but one thing is crystal clear we must oppose any United States war escalations. Those of us in the United States have a special duty to oppose the main enemy of the peoples of the world.    



Here is another view from the left -

*"REDS"-The Movie-"Radical Chic"-The John Reed-Louise Bryant Romance

"REDS"-The Movie-"Radical Chic"-The John Reed-Louise Bryant Romance

Click on title to link to YouTube's film clip of a trailer on "Reds"

DVD REVIEW











REDS, THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION (ORIGINALLY RELEASED IN 1981)

The important contribution of John Reed to the revolutionary movement here in America before World War I and later during the Russian revolution and its aftermath has never been fully appreciated. Thus, Warren Beatty, whatever his personal motives, has done a great service in filming the life of this “traitor to his class” (and his Harvard Class of 1910) and partisan of the international working class.

As usual with such commercial enterprises the order of things gets switched in the wrong direction. The love affair between Reed (played by Beatty) and budding writer and early feminist Louise Bryant (played by Diane Keaton)(and a little third party intervention by playwright Eugene O’Neill, played by Jack Nicholson) is set against the backdrop of the Russian Revolution not the other way around, but such is cinematic license. More than most film depictions this one mainly gets the story straight; Reed's early free-lance journalism tied to the Mexican Revolution; the bohemian life of pre-World War I Greenwich Village in New York City including it patronage by socialites like Mabel Dodge; the socialist fight against American participation in World War I; the fight among socialists (and anarchists) over support to the Russian Revolution; and, an interesting segment on the seemingly bewildering in-fighting in the early communist movement between the foreign-language federations and the Reed-led “Natives” (which included James P. Cannon,later a founder of American Trotskyism)that that ultimately had to be 'resolved' at Communist International headquarters in Moscow.

Those ‘natives’, the likes of Earl Browder, James Cannon and William Z. Foster, in the course of events would form the leadership of the party through most of the twenties when the cadre still wanted to make a revolution here and not just cheer on the Russian Revolution from afar. A nice touch in the film is the interweaving of commentaries by those, friend and foe, who knew or knew of Reed or were around during this time. See this movie.

THE GERMAN REVOLUTION OF 1923


THE GERMAN REVOLUTION OF 1923




COMMENTARY

A proper perspective on the question of the failed German revolutionary socialist opportunities starting in 1918 after the debacle of German defeat in World War I, the overthrow of the Kaiser and the establishment of a democratic republic until 1923 with the failure of the revolutionary opportunities resulting from the French reparations crisis is the subject of on-going controversy among revolutionaries. At that time most European revolutionaries, especially the Russians, placed their strategic aspirations on the success of those efforts in Germany. A different outcome during that period, with the establishment of a German Workers Republic, would have changed the course of world history in many ways, not the least of which would have been the probable saving of the isolated Russian socialist revolution and defeating German fascism in the embryo.

Since then, beginning with the Trotsky-led Russian Left Opposition in 1923 and later the International Left Opposition, revolutionaries as well as others have cut their teeth on developing an analysis of the failure of revolutionary leadership as a primary cause for that aborted German revolution. Against that well-known analysis, more recently a whole cottage industry has developed, particularly around the British journal Revolutionary History, giving encouragement to latter day hand wringing about the prospects (or lack of prospects) for revolution at that time and drawing the lesson that a revolution in Germany then could not have happened.

To buttress that argument the writings on the prospects of the 1923 revolution by August Thalheimer, a central theoretician and key adviser to German Communist Party leader Brandler in this period, have been warmly resurrected and particularly boosted. This kind of analysis, however, gets revolutionaries nowhere. It is one thing for those on the ground at the time in Germany and in the Comintern to miss the obvious signals for revolution it is another for later ‘revolutionaries’ to provide retrospective political cover for those who refused to see and act on the revolutionary opportunities at the time. The events surrounding the failed German revolution were also echoed in what was called the ‘literary debate’ inside the Russian Communist Party in 1924 at a time when the internal struggle, after the death of Lenin, was getting to a white heat. While at this historical distance it is probably impossible to argue all of the specifics of the revolutionary crisis of 1923 some lessons stick out.

A quick sketch of events beginning from the start of World War I with the famous treachery of the German Social Democratic leadership in voting for the Kaiser’s war budget (and continuing to vote for it) are in some ways decisive for what happened in 1923. Later, facing the consequences of the defeat of the German army, war exhaustion and the possibility of harsh reprisals from the Allied forces the Kaiser’s government was overthrown shortly after the armistice was signed and the fight was on in earnest for the future of Germany. That question as least temporarily, however, was not decided until the German working class had been subdued and or brought off with a bourgeois democratic republic, the notorious Weimar Republic. Unlike the earlier Russian experience in 1917 no independent mobilization of the working class through Soviets or other pan-working class organizations was fought for to the end. And that is the rub. This is the start of the problem. No Bolshevik-type organization was present to take advantage of the revolutionary situation. What is worst, the forces that did exist led by the heroic martyrs Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht were defeated and they personally were tragically and ominously murdered. Thus, a known and tested leadership was an essential missing ingredient that was to have consequences all the way through to 1923.

When a German Bolshevik-type organization finally was formed it contained many elements that were subjectively revolutionary but political naïve or disoriented, and suffered from anarchistic excesses in reaction to the stifling Social Democratic atmosphere of the pre-war period. While a party needs those subjectively elements to make the revolution, and this writer would argue that it cannot be made without them, this confusion gave the Social Democratic party plenty of ammunition for its reformist, parliamentary position. The key result of this lack of organization and proper preparededness was the so-called March Action of 1921. Unlike the overwhelming reaction of the German working class to the attempted Kopp Putsch of the previous year this was an action that went off half–cocked and did much to discredit communists in the eyes of the working class. The sorry results of this action had reverberations all the way up to the Communist International where Lenin and Trotsky were forced to defend the action in public, expel the former German party leader Paul Levi for a breech of discipline for his open criticism of the action (while it was going on) but also point out that it was the wrong way to go. In any case one cannot understand what happened (or did not happen) in 1923 without acknowledging the gun shyness of the Communist party leadership caused by the 1921 events.

So what is the specific argument of 1923 all about? Was there or was there not a realistic revolutionary opportunity to fight for a Soviet Germany which would have gone a long way to saving the Russian Revolution? On the face of it this question is a no-brainer. Of course there was a revolutionary situation. If the disruptions caused by the French take-over in the Ruhr in order to obtain their war reparations and the resultant passive resistance policy of the German government and the later inflationary spiral that affected many layers of German society was not a classic revolutionary situation then there are none this side of heaven. End of story.

The real question that underlines any argument against a revolutionary crisis is what to do (other than stick your head in the sand). This is where the previous “ultra" policies of the German Communist Party came into play. The party remained passive at a time when it was necessary for action. The leadership, including our above-mentioned friend Thalheimer, acted as if a revolutionary crisis would last for a prolonged period and that they had all the time in the world. They caught Zinoviev's disease (named for the Bolshevik leader who always seemed instinctively to go passive when it was necessary for action, and visa versa). Moreover, most critically they did not take advantage of the decline in the authority of the Social Democratic Party in order to win over the mass of the rank and file Soical Democrats that were leaving it in droves. That is where the preceding events described above come into play. The destruction of the authoritative leadership of Luxemburg and Liebknecht left a lesser layer of cadre not known for pursuing an aggressive strategy when called for. It is hard to believe that Luxemburg and Liebknecht would have responded in the same way as the Brandler/Thalheimer leadership. I would argue, if anything, Liebknecht would have had to be restrained a little. This is, in the final analysis, the decisive problem of the failure of the German Revolution in 1923. Nobody can predict whether a revolutionary crisis will lead to revolutionary success but one must certainly know when to move as the Bolsheviks did.

And what of the other reasons given for holding back. The fascists were a menace but hardly more than that. Damn, if they were really as much of a menace as right-wing social democrats and communists have portrayed the situation in 1923 what the hell were the fascists in say 1930, when they had 100,000 well-organized and fighting mad storm troopers in the streets. With that view the only rational policy for Communist would have been to make sure the German working class had its passports in order. As we tragically know there are never enough passports. And what of the German Army and outside capitalist military intervention? The army was not that big even though augmented by ‘unofficial’ paramilitary forces. It definitely would have been harder to split these forces along class lines. But workers militias would have at least been able to hold the line. And do not forget the more than willing Red Army was within a few days march to assist. As the Bolshevik Revolution and the ensuing Civil demonstrated in the final analysis a revolution is victorious or defeated despite the influence of whatever foreign forces are scheming against the regime.

And what about the internal capitalist opposition? And what about the stabilization of the economic situation? One can go on forever with the problems and talk oneself out of any action. While all these factors individually might argue against a revolutionary crisis in 1923 jointly they create the notion that this was a big revolutionary opportunity lost. That should make one suspicious, very suspicious, of the credentials of those ‘revolutionaries’ who argue that one did not exist. Read more on this subject.I know I will.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance!

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance! 

Frank Jackman comment; 

We can be all over the place on our opinions about what is happening in Syria-who to support-or not support- but one thing is crystal clear we must oppose any United States war escalations. Those of us in the United States have a special duty to oppose the main enemy of the peoples of the world.    



Here is another view from the left -