Thursday, May 17, 2018

From The Archives-The Struggle To Win The Youth To The Fight For Our Socialist Future

From The Archives-The Struggle To Win The Youth To The Fight For Our Socialist Future




Logo Of The Communist Youth International

Frank Jackman comment:

One of the declared purposes of this blog is to draw the lessons of our left-wing past, spotty and incomplete as they may be, here in America and internationally, especially from the pro-communist wing. Historically these lessons would be centrally derived from the revolution of 1848 in Europe, especially in France, the Paris Commune of 1871, and most vividly under the impact of the Lenin and Trotsky-led Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917, which is now a 100th anniversary event, a world historic achievement for the international working class whose subsequent demise was of necessity a world-historic defeat for that same class. To that end I have made commentaries and provided archival works in order to help draw those lessons for today’s left-wing activists to learn, or at least ponder over.

More importantly, for the long haul, and unfortunately given that same spotty and incomplete past the long haul is what appears to be the time frame that this old militant will have to concede that we need to think about, to help educate today’s youth in the struggle for our common communist future. An education that masses of previous generations of youth undertook gladly but which now is reduced to a precious few.  That is beside the question of numbers in any case no small or easy task given the differences of generations at least in America (the missing transmission generation problem between the generation of ’68 who tried unsuccessfully to turn the world upside down and failed, the missing in between generation raised on Reagan rations and today’s desperate youth in need of all kinds of help); differences of political milieus worked in (another missing link situation with the attenuation of the links to the old mass socialist and communist organizations decimated by the red scare Cold War 1950s night of the long knives through the new old New Left of the 1960s and little notable organizational connections since; differences of social structure to work around (the serious erosion of the industrial working class in America, the rise of the white collar service sector, the now organically chronically unemployed, and the rise of the technocrats); and, increasingly more important, the differences in appreciation of technological advances, and their uses (today’s  computer, cellphone, and social networking savvy youth using those assets as tools for organizing).

There is no question that back in my youth in the 1960s I could have used, desperately used, many of the archival materials available today. When I developed political consciousness very early on, albeit liberal political consciousness, I could have used this material as I knew, I knew deep inside my heart and mind, that a junior Cold War liberal of the American For Democratic Action (ADA) stripe was not the end of my leftward political trajectory. More importantly, I could have used a socialist or communist youth organization to help me articulate the doubts I had about the virtues of liberal capitalism and be recruited to a more left-wing world view.

As it was I spent far too long in the throes of the left-liberal/soft social-democratic milieu where I was dying politically. A group like the Young Communist League (W.E.B. Dubois Clubs in those days), the Young People’s Socialist League, or the Young Socialist Alliance representing the youth organizations of the American Communist Party, American Socialist Party and the Socialist Workers Party (U.S.) respectively would have saved much wasted time and energy. I knew they were around but not in my area.
The archival material that I used in this series was weighted heavily toward the youth movements of the early American Communist Party and the Socialist Workers Party (U.S). For more recent material I have relied on material from the Spartacus Youth Clubs, the youth group of the Spartacist League (U.S.), both because they are more readily available to me and because, and this should give cause for pause, there are not many other non-CP, non-SWP youth groups around. As I gather more material from other youth sources I will place them in this series.

Finally I would like to finish up with the preamble to the Spartacist Youth Club’s What We Fight For statement of purpose:

"The Spartacus Youth Clubs intervene into social struggles armed with the revolutionary internationalist program of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky. We work to mobilize youth in struggle as partisans of the working class, championing the liberation of black people, women and all the oppressed. The SYCs fight to win youth to the perspective of building the Leninist vanguard party that will lead the working class in socialist revolution, laying the basis for a world free of capitalist exploitation and imperialist slaughter."
This seems to me be somewhere in the right direction for what a Bolshevik youth group should be doing these days; a proving ground to become professional revolutionaries with enough wiggle room to learn from their mistakes, and successes. More later.
**********
Third Congress of the Communist International

The Communist International and the Communist Youth Movement

Source: Theses Resolutions and Manifestos of the First Four Congress of the Third International, translated by Alix Holt and Barbara Holland. Ink Links 1980;
Transcribed: by Andy Blunden.

12 July 1921
1 The young socialist movement came into existence as a result of the steadily increasing capitalist exploitation of young workers and also of the growth of bourgeois militarism. The movement was a reaction against attempts to poison the minds of young workers with bourgeois nationalist ideology and against the tendency of most of the social-democratic parties and the trade unions to neglect the economic, political and cultural demands of young workers.

In most countries the social-democratic parties and the unions, which were growing increasingly opportunist and revisionist, took no part in establishing young socialist organisations, and in certain countries they even opposed the creation of a youth movement. The reformist social-democratic parties and trade unions saw the independent revolutionary socialist youth organisations as a serious threat to their opportunist policies. They sought to introduce a bureaucratic control over the youth organisations and destroy their independence, thus stifling the movement, changing its character and adapting it to social-democratic politics.
2 As a result of the imperialist war and the positions taken towards it by social democracy almost everywhere, the contradictions between the social-democratic parties and the international revolutionary organisations inevitably grew and eventually led to open conflict. The living conditions of young workers sharply deteriorated; there was mobilisation and military service on the one hand, and, on the other, the increasing exploitation in the munitions industries and militarisation of civilian life. The most class-conscious young socialists opposed the war and the nationalist propaganda. They dissociated themselves from the social-democratic parties and undertook independent political activity (the International Youth Conferences at Berne in 1915 and Jena in 1916).

In their struggle against the war, the young socialist organisations were supported by the most dedicated revolutionary groups and became an important focus for the revolutionary forces. In most countries no revolutionary parties existed and the youth organisations took over their role; they became independent political organisations and acted as the vanguard in the revolutionary struggle.
3 With the establishment of the Communist International and, in some countries, of Communist Parties, the role of the revolutionary youth organisations changes. Young workers, because of their economic position and because of their psychological make-up, are more easily won to Communist ideas and are quicker to show enthusiasm for revolutionary struggle than adult workers. Nevertheless, the youth movement relinquishes to the Communist Parties its vanguard role of organising independent activity and providing political leadership. The further existence of Young Communist organisations as politically independent and leading organisations would mean that two Communist Parties existed, in competition with one another and differing only in the age of their membership.
4 At the present time the role of the Young Communist movement is to organise the mass of young workers, educate them in the ideas of Communism, and draw them into the struggle for the Communist revolution.

The Communist youth organisations can no longer limit themselves to working in small propaganda circles. They must win the broad masses of workers by conducting a permanent campaign of agitation, using the newest methods. In conjunction with the Communist Parties and the trade unions, they must organise the economic struggle.

The new tasks of the Communist youth organisations require that their educational work be extended and intensified. The members of the youth movement receive their Communist education on the one hand through active participation in all revolutionary struggles and on the other through a study of Marxist theory.

Another important task facing the Young Communist organisations in the immediate future is to break the hold of centrist and social-patriotic ideas on young workers and free the movement from the influences of the social-democratic officials and youth leaders. At the same time, the Young Communist organisations must do everything they can to ‘rejuvenate’ the Communist Parties by parting with their older members, who then join the adult Parties.

The Young Communist organisations participate in the discussion of all political questions, help build the Communist Parties and take part in all revolutionary activity and struggle. This is the main difference between them and the youth sections of the centrist and socialist unions.
5 The relations between the Young Communist organisations and the Communist Party are fundamentally different from those between the revolutionary young socialist organisations and the social-democratic parties. In the common struggle to hasten the proletarian revolution, the greatest unity and strictest centralisation are essential. Political leadership at the international level must belong to the Communist International and at the national level to the respective national sections.

It is the duty of the Young Communist organisations to follow this political leadership (its programme, tactics and political directives) and merge with the general revolutionary front. The Communist Parties are at different stages of development and therefore the Executive Committee of the Communist International and the Executive Committee of the Communist Youth International should apply this principle in accordance with the circumstances obtaining in each particular case.

The Young Communist movement has begun to organise its members according to the principle of strict centralisation and in its relations with the Communist International – the leader and bearer of the proletarian revolution – it will be governed by an iron discipline. All political and tactical questions are discussed in the ranks of the Communist youth organisation, which then takes a position and works in the Communist Party of its country in accordance with the resolutions passed by the Party, in no circumstance working against them.

If the Communist youth organisation has serious differences with the Communist Party, it has the right to appeal to the Executive Committee of the Communist International.

Loss of political independence in no way implies loss of the organisational independence which is so essential for political education.

Strong centralisation and effective unity are essential for the successful advancement of the revolutionary struggle, and therefore, in those countries where historical development has left the youth dependent upon the Party, the dependence should be preserved; differences between the two bodies are decided by the EC of the Communist International and the Executive Committee of the Communist Youth International.
6 One of the most immediate and most important tasks of the Young Communist organisations is to fight the belief in political independence inherited from the period when the youth organisations enjoyed absolute autonomy, and which is still subscribed to by some members. The press and organisational apparatus of the Young Communist movement must be used to educate young workers to be responsible and active members of a united Communist Party.

At the present time the Communist youth organisations are beginning to attract increasing numbers of young workers and are developing into mass organisations; it is therefore important that they give the greatest possible time and effort to education.
7 Close co-operation between the Young Communist organisations and the Communist Parties in political work must be reflected in close organisational links. It is essential that each organisation should at all times be represented at all levels of the other organisation (from the central Party organs and district, regional and local organisations down to the cells of Communist groups and the trade unions) and particularly at all conferences and congresses. 
In this way the Communist Parties will be able to exert a permanent influence on the movement and encourage political activity, while the youth organisations, in their turn, can influence the Party.




8 The relations established between the Communist Youth International and the Communist International are even closer than those between the individual Parties and their youth organisations. The Communist Youth International has to provide the Communist youth movement with a centralised leadership, offer moral and material support to individual unions, form Young Communist organisations where none has existed and publicise the Communist youth movement and its programme. The Communist Youth International is a section of the Communist International and, as such, is bound by the decisions of its congresses and its Central Committee. The Communist Youth International conducts its work within the framework of these decisions and thus passes on the political line of the Communist International to all its sections. A well-developed system of reciprocal representation and close and constant co-operation guarantees that the Communist Youth International will make gains in all the spheres of its activity (leadership, agitation, organisation and the work of strengthening and supporting the Communist youth organisations).

To pay for a 'Russia first' agenda, Putin takes ax to military spending

To pay for a 'Russia first' agenda, Putin takes ax to military spending

 
With the tensions between Russia and the West so high – often being described as “a new cold war” – one might understandably assume that there is a corresponding arms race going on. But in fact, Russia's military spending is on the decline. In the first strategic program of his new and possibly final presidential term, Vladimir Putin announced plans for a relentless focus on domestic development, to be partially paid for by sharp cuts in defense spending.
 
Cuts to defense spending will go toward underwriting that agenda. But in fact, Russian defense spending has already started to decline. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Russian military spending fell by 20 percent last year, the first major decrease in two decades. While critics dispute the amount and suggest there may be budgetary machinations at work, most analysts agree that the share of military spending as a percentage of GDP is set to fall, from 6.6 percent in 2016, to 5 percent this year and to 3 percent by the end of Putin's current term in 2024.
 
 
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
http://www.space4peace.org 
http://space4peace.blogspot.com  (blog)

Thank God men cannot fly, and lay waste the sky as well as the earth. - Henry David Thoreau

New Movie Harvest of Empire: The Untold Story of Latinos in America Thursday - May 17 @ 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm Cambridge Central Square Library

New Movie
Harvest of Empire: The Untold Story of Latinos in America
Thursday - May 17 @ 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm
Cambridge Central Square Library
45 Pearl Street (Red Line or parking lot on Green street)
Harvest of Empire

At a time of heated and divisive debate over immigration, Harvest of Empire reveals the direct connection between the long history of U.S. intervention in Latin America and the immigration crisis we face today.

Based on the groundbreaking book by award-winning journalist and Democracy Now! co-host Juan González, Harvest of Empire takes an unflinching look at the role that U.S. economic and military interests played in triggering an unprecedented wave of migration that is transforming our nation’s cultural and economic landscape.

From the wars for territorial expansion that gave the U.S. control of Puerto Rico, Cuba and more than half of Mexico, to the covert operations that imposed oppressive military regimes in the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Nicaragua and El Salvador, Harvest of Empire unveils a moving human story that is largely unknown to the great majority of citizens in the U.S.

As Juan González says at the beginning of the film “They never teach us in school that the huge Latino presence here is a direct result of our own government’s actions in Mexico, the Caribbean and Central America over many decades — actions that forced millions from that region to leave their homeland and journey north.”
Harvest of Empire provides a rare and powerful glimpse into the enormous sacrifices and rarely-noted triumphs of our nation’s growing Latino community. The film features present day immigrant stories, rarely seen archival material, as well as interviews with such respected figures as Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Rigoberta Menchú, the Reverend Jesse Jackson, ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero, Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Junot Díaz, Mexican historian Dr. Lorenzo Meyer, journalists María Hinojosa and Geraldo Rivera, Grammy award-winning singer Luis Enrique, and poet Martín Espada.

Join us for a screening and discussion on Thursday May 17th! For Information call 617-349-4010 orhttp://masspeaceaction.org/event/screening-harvest-of-empire/


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Massachusetts State Network for Peace and Justice" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mass-peace-justice-net+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mass-peace-justice-net@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mass-peace-justice-net/SN1PR08MB1773EA27E7A29A44F9F2BDEAB2930%40SN1PR08MB1773.namprd08.prod.outlook.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

From Socialist Alternative-Tax Amazon Movement Wins in Seattle!

TAX AMAZON MOVEMENT WINS IN SEATTLE!

On May 14, the Seattle City Council passed a historic tax on Amazon and other big corporations to fund permanently affordable, publicly owned housing. The driving force behind this victory was the strength of our #TaxAmazon movement. Under the leadership of housing activists, Socialist Alternative, Democratic Socialists of America and Councilmember Kshama Sawant, our movement put this issue on the table last fall when we occupied City Hall overnight and brought our fight into the November City Council budget hearings.
In the week before the final vote, big business and their purchased politicians like Mayor Jenny Durkan furiously worked to water down the legislation and fill it with corporate loopholes. Mayor Durkan put forward a counter proposal that cut the proposed $75 million tax nearly in half to $40 million a year with the majority going to temporary services, which will include inhumane homeless sweeps, rather than building permanently affordable housing. Due to the strength of our Tax Amazon movement, her proposal was voted down by the City Council finance committee.

Over the weekend however, while the movement was in the streets fighting for $75 million with no corporate loopholes, the rest of the City Council was working out a deal with the Mayor and big business. While the deal they worked out is only marginally better than the Bezos-Durkan deal with $48 million in new revenue as opposed to the proposed $75 million, it is a $48 million per year transfer of wealth from the hands of big business to working people that would never have been won without the fight we mounted.   
As with the $15 minimum wage, what we won was based on the strength of our movement, our ability to continue to mobilize broad public support, and our ability to politically defeat the arguments of big business. Amazon fought viciously against this tax in its entirety and we have now wrested tens of millions from Bezos’ hands to fund affordable housing.

Amazon’s Extortion and Capitalism’s Race to the Bottom

In the lead up to the final vote, Amazon sent an extortionary threat to Seattle workers. Amazon promised to halt construction in Seattle if this tax was passed, holding over 7,000 construction jobs hostage!
Let’s be crystal clear: it made no immediate financial sense for Amazon to halt construction on this project part-way through, and this tax doesn’t even come close to making a dent in the massive profits they make in Seattle. This was a shameful act of bullying by the billionaire class and a blatant attempt to divide Seattle workers. Amazon’s share of the tax would have been pocket change to Jeff Bezos, the richest man on earth.

This extortion was an attempt to maintain an iron grip over local political policy by flexing the muscles of their massive capital and weight in the Seattle economy. It was also a message aimed at intimidating workers in other cities around the country where Amazon has offices and fulfillment centers. As socialists, we are not naive about Amazon’s enormous power or the number of jobs it holds sway over, but we completely reject capitalism’s race to the bottom which seeks to pit housing against jobs, city against city, and worker against worker.
It is threats like this that graphically demonstrate the brutal race to the bottom inherent in the system of capitalism. Big corporations like Amazon are looking to cut costs at every turn, and workers always bear the brunt of these attacks. This is standard for a system that places profit and the wealth of a few over the needs of the vast majority of society. Jeff Bezos’ wealth sits on top of the shoulders of tens of thousands of Amazon employees, and it’s those employees who make the company run and create its wealth.

We need a fundamentally different society — a socialist society — where rather than bending to corporate extortion, we take big corporations like Amazon into democratic public ownership and run them by workers instead. Trendsetting victories by socialists like a tax on Amazon or the passage of a $15 minimum wage are critical first steps, but our movements cannot stop there.

Need for Social Housing

Capitalism is incapable of providing quality affordable housing for all, and we need to fight for an alternative to the broken private housing market and for rent control. We need a massive expansion of tens of thousands of units of publicly-owned and operated social housing which is not susceptible to the whims of the market. Instead of the billionaire class and the real estate lobby holding sway over how much a person pays for housing, we could begin to provide an alternative for working people.

We can also make sure all money generated though rents is invested straight back into maintaining and expanding publicly owned housing instead of being funneled upwards into profits. Finally, we can mandate that the housing be built with 100% union labor with priority hire given to local and minority-owned construction firms, ensuring the maximum benefit for Seattle workers.

We are Ready to Fight! Another World is Possible.

The victory our movement has won in Seattle has the potential to spread around the country. While it is not the full amount we demanded and far less than is needed, it was nearly $50 million more than Amazon and other big corporations were willing to pay. It is also twice as much as establishment politicians on the City Council voted down last fall during the budget hearings. By building a determined, unapologetic movement we have won one of the most progressive big business taxes in the country!

The leadership of Socialist Alternative and Kshama Sawant in this movement cannot be overstated. By basing ourselves on the power of working people to disrupt business as usual, we forced the entire business and political establishment in Seattle to capitulate to our movement.
Now, we have to continue the fight. We are done quietly sitting by while our city’s establishment allows big business and developers to run amok, denying us, our friends, and neighbors our right to safe and affordable housing. We need to fight not only for immediate gains in the present, but for an alternative to the bankrupt system of capitalism; For a future where nobody is allowed to die alone on the street, nobody is forced to choose between homelessness and an abusive partner, and nobody is forced out of the city where they work.
We are fighting for a city and a world based on solidarity, equality, and democracy – on the needs and aspirations of all working people and oppressed communities. We need to unite our struggles – to tax Amazon and big business, to fight for a $15 minimum wage, to strike for fully funded education, to end police brutality and the mass incarceration system – to fight for a different kind of society. We have a world to win.

Memorial Day VA Privatization Bills-Stop The Privatization Of The Veterans Administration

To  

Two new bills being voted on in the next weeks: 

     In the next two weeks, Congress will vote on a bill that will significantly influence the future of the Veterans Health Administration.  The VA Mission Act of 2018, H.R. 5674, has already been voted out of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, and will reach the full House very soon.  The Senate Veterans Affairs Committee will be voting on a mirror image bill and may receive favorable treatment there.  Then it will be voted on by the full Senate.  Although this bill has been supported by virtually all veterans service organizations (VSOs) , after careful analysis of the bill (please see our website for the full analysis), we believe it should be opposed by every veteran and every American concerned with the delivery of high quality care to veterans, as well as the maintenance and improvement of a healthcare system that can serve as a model for how health care should be delivered.
     Provisions in this bill will open the floodgates for expanded outsourcing of VHA care to the private sector.  The high costs of this outsourcing will threaten VHA care and caregivers, leading to staff layoffs and facility closures.  Because of sequestration, the high cost of this will also pit veteran healthcare against other needed government programs.
     Provisions in the bill will fragment the VHA’s model of integrated care by channeling more veterans into walk-in clinics that are already a subject of controversy in the private sector system.  The bill will create an unaccountable commission that will assess which VHA facilities should be closed.  Although many VSOs believe that this Commission will be subject to public control and can lead to creating expanded facilities and much needed infrastructure repair, we worry that a Commission chosen largely by President Trump and a deeply anti VHA Congress will do just the opposite.  The kind of increased outsourcing of care encouraged by the Act threatens to deprive VHA facilities of patients and staff and justify their closure.
     Veterans service organizations are convinced that these problems are manageable, can be monitored, and even reversed.  We are not so sanguine about the ability to harness the outsourcing of care and protect veterans from predatory providers more interested in getting their hands on taxpayer money than serving vulnerable veterans.
 

Contact your representatives in Congress:

We urge you to contact your lawmakers at 833-480-1637 and ask them to vote against the bill.  If it passes, we also urge you to make sure they monitor the roll out of an experiment that may deliver lower quality care to veterans at higher cost, overburden the private sector healthcare system, pit veterans against private sector patients, and erode a shining model of healthcare that serves not only veterans but all Americans.
Sample Letters HERE







This email was sent to alfredjohnson34@comcast.net
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
Veterans Healthcare Action Campaign · 10200 Firwood Dr · Cupertino, Ca 95014 · USA

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

From Veterans For Peace-Take Action Now-Defend The Palestinian People-No War On The Korean People




www.veteransforpeace.org

 

Veterans Condemn Israeli Slaughter of Unarmed Palestinian Protesters

Israel receives $3.8 billion in U.S. military aid every year, making it the largest recipient of U.S. foreign assistance. U.S. laws, such as the "Leahy Law," the Arms Export Control Act, and the Foreign Assistance Act, are supposed to prevent U.S. weapons from being used by other countries to commit human rights violations. Countries that violate these laws are subject to penalties, including a cut-off of additional weapons.
Furthermore, the opening of the embassy in Jerusalem flies in the face of diplomacy and creates a massive roadblock on a path to peace.  It is outrageous that our government continues to uphold and further such actions.
Israel must be held accountable for its actions!Email Your Congressional Representative Now!

End U.S. Military Exercises in Korea

The announcement of the cancellation of talks between North and South Korea lies solely at the feet of the United States.  The people of Korea have advocated and worked diligently to secure peace and to push for a path of reconciliation.  The United States continues to stand in the way of these efforts.
The United States is holding large scale war exercises in the Korean Peninsula, in the waters surrounding North Korea.  The people of Korea have repeatedly advocated a “Freeze for a Freeze", whereupon the U.S. would cease their military exercises in exchange for a freeze on N. Korea’s nuclear program.  An agreement that almost every other country in the region has supported.
The United States MUST stop being a hindrance for peace and cease their military exercises immediately.
P.S.  If you have not already registered, please come to our Korea Advocacy Days June 11-12
Veterans For Peace appreciates your generous donations.
We also encourage you to join our ranks.



Footer