Friday, October 12, 2018

“Shoot Pools ‘Fast Eddie,’ Shoot Pools”-With Paul Newman’s “The Hustler” In Mind

“Shoot Pools ‘Fast Eddie,’ Shoot Pools”-With Paul Newman’s “The Hustler” In Mind
              

                             
By Lance Lawrence

“Fast Eddie” Felson was the greatest pool player to ever put chalk to stick and you had better believe that hard fact because I know from whence I speak. In most quarters, among the serious followers of the game, I, Jackie “Big Man” Gleason think that title belongs to me. Think an old tub who learned the game in Hell’s Kitchen at Jackie Kane’s dimly lit pool hall from guys who would break your knuckles if they even had seen a breath of air that you might be hustling them. I never had my knuckles broken but they also never knew when I hustled their carfare home if I had the chance. I was that raw and thought I was that good. Until “Fast Eddie” came strolling in the door one day all hungry and eager to take on “Big Man,” make a name for himself and put me on cheap street. I knew that I would take that strutting bastard down at first but I also knew deep down that whatever the “official” rankings which in those days was how much jack you took from the competition I also knew that someday I would be uttering those words that I just said to start my story about “Fast Eddie”

Maybe you never heard of “Fast Eddie,” never knew the story behind the story of how for a couple of years anyhow, maybe three, he ruled the roost, he was the king of the hill. All I know is from the first moment Eddie entered Sharkey’s Pool Hall, the place where my manager, Bart, and I hustled all comers at the sport of kings, down on 12th Avenue in the teeming city of New York I was afraid to play him. Afraid he would damage my reputation as the king of the hill. I had never played game one against him but still I sensed something in his swagger, in his bravado that made my hands shake. Shaky hands the kiss of death in our profession.

I don’t know if I can explain that pit in my stomach feeling I am not much given to introspection a word I never heard of before the guy who I first told this story, a journalist, he called himself, and as long as he was not blowing smoke my way I believe him and if this little story ever gets published that my view of fucking hard luck sports reporters who get assigned to interview “retired” sports figure like me will improve greatly. If not, fuck it I just wanted to get the tale told and that is that. This introspection stuff, this thinking about why I had that pit in the stomach and why I worried about cheap street like a lot of other guys, Willie Hoppe, the legendary “Minnesota Fats, “Jersey Fats,” guys like that who had to hang up their hats when they magic left their when a guy like me, like “Big Man” or then “Fast Eddie” came up and took at the dingy pool hall air away. Let me try to give you an idea, okay. I was a guy, a wiseass guy no question, laughing at the idea that some two bit strong arms would miff my play, would do my knuckles in when I was in my Jake. But see I had learned the game, learned all angles and hustles by putting what they nowadays call doing the 10,000 hours of work to perfect whatever skill you were trying to perfect. I knew at any given time on any given night what I could and could not do with the rack when they spread their wings. That and maybe a cynical hustler’s sense of another man’s weaknesses (woman as far as I knew did play, play high stakes pool then at least I never ran across and who wanted to play although I ran into plenty of women was wanted to help me spend my money, and they did).

“Fast Eddie” though the minute he came in the door, the minute he put chalk to stick just had a feel for what to do. Maybe he spent about five minutes doing the work I spent those lonely 10, 000 hours and the rest was pure spirit, karma, Zen whatever the fuck you want to call it. Made me almost pee my pants when he strutted up the table all lean and hungry, a guy named Shakespeare I remember from school or maybe my father who loved the cat, told everybody to watch out for those kinds and avoid them like the plague. Yeah, strutted right up to the table knowing that I was sitting right there with my manager Bart and proceeded to run the rack without stopping to look, closing those damn blue eyes before every fucking shot. So I knew I was done except I also knew, or maybe Bart had a better handle on it just then that I would take him down the first time he wanted to challenge me. He had to be bloodied first before he took over the kingship. There was no other way. Bart and I laughed, maybe a cynical laugh, how we would skin that cat before he even knew what hit him. See young lean and hungry guys, blue eyes or not forget about the barrelful of tricks an old pro had accumulated to keep the landlord from the door.                       

In case you don’t know, and maybe some readers might not having decided to read my homage to “Fast Eddie” based on the “hook” that this was about Paul Newman the movie actor shooting big-time pool, hustling pool in the old days before Vegas, Atlantic City, Carson City started putting up money to have high dollar championships was about more that learning technique, having a vision of where the fucking balls would enter the pockets like your mother’s womb. A lot more. It was about having heart, about something that they would call Zen today but which we called “from hunger” in my day. Eddie’s too. That’s what Eddie had, that is what I sensed, what brought me to cold sweats when that swaggering son of a bitch came looking for me like I was somebody’s crippled up grandfather. It took a while, Eddie took his beatings before he understood what drove his art but he got it, got it so good that I left the game for a couple of years and went out West to hustler wealthy Hollywood moguls who loved the idea of “beating” “Big Man” Gleason at ten thousand a showing just for the sake of playing will a big time pool hustler.             

But forget about me and my troubles once Fast Eddie came through that long ago door after all this is about how the best man who ever handled a stick got to earn that title in my book. Like a lot of guys after the war, after World War II, after seeing the world in one way Eddie was ready to ditch his old life, was ready to take some chances and say “fuck you” to the nine to five world that would be death to a free spirit like him (that “free spirit” would put a few daggers in his heart before he was done but that is for later). Eddie, against my doughty frame, my big man languid frame, was a rangy kid, kind of tall, wiry, good built and Hollywood bedroom eyes like, well, like Paul Newman when he was a matinee idol making all the women, girls too, wet. Strictly “from hunger” just like in my time, the Great Depression, I had been the same before I left Minnesota for the great big lights of the city and “action.” Like I said raw and untamed but I could tell that very first time he put the stick to the green clothe he had the magic, had that something that cannot be learned but only come to the saints and those headed for the sky.           

So Eddie came in with a few thousand ready to take on the “Big Man.” While I feared this young pup I sensed that I could teach him a lesson, maybe a lesson that would hold him in good stead, maybe not, but which would at least give me enough breathing room to figure out what I would do when Eddie claimed his crown. His first mistake, a rookie error that I myself had committed was not having a partner, a manager to rein him in, to hold him back in tough times. He had some old rum dum, Charley, Billy, something like that, who cares except this rum dum was a timid bastard who couldn’t hold up his end. His end being strictly to estimate his opponent and rein the kid in when he was off his game like we all get sometimes. Me, like I said after I wised up, teamed up with Bart, Bart who knew exactly who and who was not a “loser” and who didn’t lose my money by making bad matches or bad side bets (those side bets were the cushion money that got us through hard times and many times were more than whatever we won at straight up games).      

All I am saying is that this kid’s manager did Fast Eddie wrong, let him go wild that first night when he was all gassed up to beat the Big Man. You already know that I whipped his ass or you haven’t been paying close enough attention. But that was all a ruse like I said, all kid bravado and swagger added in so it was like taking candy from a baby that first night. But I knew I was beat, beat bad in a straight up contest. What saved me that night was two things, no three. First, Fast Eddie like lots of kids figured that he could beat an old man with his hands tied behind his back and so he started his “victory lap” drinking, drinking hard high-end scotch even before the match had started. Second, he was cocky enough to declare that the only way to determine the winner was who cried “uncle” first (Bart smiled and whispered “loser” in my ear at hearing that). Third and last he had picked up this broad, some boozer and maybe a hooker named, Sandy, Susie, no, Sarah whom he was trying to impress somehow. She looked like a lost kitten but I didn’t give a damn about that just that Fast Eddie’s mind would be half on getting her down under the sheets, maybe had dreams of getting a blow job for his efforts she looked the type who was into some kinky stuff just for kicks. At least that was the way it looked at the time. As I will tell you later it was very different and I was totally wrong about the dame.          

It took almost twenty-eight hours in that dark dank smelly booze-strewn Sharkey pool hall which looked like something out of the movies’ idea of what a low rent pool hall should look like complete with low-lifes but eventually between the booze, the bravado, and the broad I took Eddie down, left him about two hundred bucks “walking around” money. Left him to cry “uncle.” Cry it for the last time. Between grabbing Fast Eddie’s money and the side bets Bart made I, we were able to lay off for a couple of months (usually after a big score that was standard practice since the one-time suckers who want to brag to the hometown folks that they played hard and fast with the Big Man and almost won scatter to the winds for a while before they inevitably come back for their well-deserved beatings). Bart said, no crowed, that he had had Fast Eddie’s number, a “loser.” Was another gone guy, forget him.  But I had seen some moves, some moves especially before the booze got the better of the kid that I could only dream of trying without looking like a rube.         

This part of the story coming up I pieced together from what Bart told me, what Sharkey had heard, and what little Fast Eddie let on when he came back at me in earnest, in that Zen state or whatever the fuck you want to call it when a guy is “walking with the king.” Eddie went into “hiding,” went licking his wounds, which in the pool world meant that he was trying to put a stake together hustling at pool halls in bowling alleys, places like that where the rubes are dying to lose a fin or double sawbuck and not cry about it. A player at the kid’s level though would have a hard time of making much scratch with the carnival-wheelers so unbeknownst to me Eddie got in touch with Bart who staked him to some dough for a big cut of the proceedings. They made money, a fair amount, but Bart, at least this is what he told me later after I pistol-whipped him before I left for Hollywood and the big beautiful suckers there figured that would just come back to me in the end because Bart still had the kid down as a loser, a big bad loser.         

This part is murkier still. Along the way on this trip that Bart and Fast Eddie took to fleece the rubes this Sarah started to get religion, started wanted to settle down with Eddie, make Eddie settle down. After I had beaten him when he was laying low he moved in with her, they got along okay until Eddie connected with Bart whom Sarah definitely did not like, I guess she was off the bottle for a while but started in again once she saw that Eddie wouldn’t give up his dream, his dream of beating the Big Man. This part is even murkier but one night Eddie was hustling some Bourbon king and Bart and Sarah were left behind to drink the night away. Somehow Bart, who except when negotiating bets and matches was a pretty smooth talker, conned Sarah who was miffed at Eddie like I said into bed. Got her to either take him around the world or let him take her anally (or he forced the issue figuring she was just a bent whore anyway he had odd sexual desires from what I was able to figure out after a few years with him). The boozy haze, the rough sex, being unfaithful to Eddie, maybe her whole fucking life marching before her left her with who knows what angry feelings. In any case that night before Eddie got home she had slit her wrists.     

This last part is not murky, not murky at all. After beating the hell out of Bart he took the bus back to New York and one night he came through Sharkey’s door and I knew I was roasted (Bart had telegramed about what had happened and told me that he would put up fifty thousand dollars against Fast Eddie’s luck). I had no choice but to play the play out. After Fast Eddie took that fifty thousand and another twenty-five that I had put up I cried “uncle.” Cried uncle and left for Hollywood and the bright lights. Left Fast Eddie to play out his string, left Eddie to “shoot pools, ‘Fast Eddie’, shoot pools.”     

Join Us: Art, Peace and Health on Oct 26th Amy Hendrickson

Amy Hendrickson<amyh@texnology.com>

Art, Peace and Health

Honoring the medical community’s role in preventing nuclear war


Dear friends,
Official replicas of two Nobel peace prizes, refreshments, and music and dance performances from around the world will be part of “Art, Peace and Health.” The event celebrates the Nobel Peace Prizes received in 1985 by International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW) and their national affiliate Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), and in 2017 by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), which IPPNW founded in 2007, for their work in educating the public about the catastrophic medical and humanitarian consequences of nuclear war. 

Founders will be honored and medical students and young doctors from Africa, Central America, Europe and the United States will speak on behalf of a new generation in the continuing international effort to abolish nuclear weapons.

The celebration also opens an exhibit of original poster art by Corita Kent, which she presented to Greater Boston PSR in the 1980s in recognition of its work for a world without war.

Musicians and dancers from Ethiopia, India, Korea, and Portugal will perform, and the Longwood Symphony Orchestra String Quartet will play.

The celebration is open to Boston’s medical community and to the public.
Please join us on Friday, Oct. 26, 4 – 6 p.m. at the Francis A. Countway Library of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.
 
We look forward to seeing you there. An RSVP is not required, but you may respond 
here so that we know to expect you.

Sincerely,
Anna Baker, GBPSR Executive Director
Michael Christ, IPPNW Executive Director
Share this email:
Manage your preferences | Opt out using TrueRemove®
Got this as a forward? Sign up to receive our future emails.
View this email online.
339 Pleasant Street 
Malden, MA | 02148 US
powered by emma

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MAPA Nuclear Disarmament" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mapa-nuclear-disarmament/021601d461a8%24f9da4ba0%24ed8ee2e0%24%40texnology.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Targeting immigrants on public assistance SocialistWorker.org

SocialistWorker.org<no-reply@socialistworker.org>

SocialistWorker.org

From our ISO comrades<br /> <br /> Fyi from Mike Heichman

Targeting immigrants on public assistance

Lucy Herschel, a paralegal with the Legal Aid Society in New York City, reports on the Trump administration’s latest assault on immigrant communities and what advocacy groups are doing to push back.
October 9, 2018
THE TRUMP administration is opening up a new front in its scorched-earth anti-immigrant campaign, this time taking aim at visa holders and visa seekers.
Since the initial days of his administration, Donald Trump has waged an all-spectrum, multi-front war on immigrants of all statuses in this country, with Black and Brown immigrants being the obvious target.
This war has ranged from the Muslim ban, to the sickeningly inhumane treatment of child refugees, to ramped-up efforts to retroactively strip citizenship in certain cases.
The intended message is clear: No one is safe, especially if you are nonwhite and low income.
So here’s what’s new: On September 22, the Department of Homeland Security issued a new proposed rule that would massively expand the definition of who they consider to be a potential “public charge,” and therefore not eligible for entry, visa renewal or permanent status. In the past, “public charges” were restricted primarily to people receiving government cash assistance or who were likely to need institutionalized care.
Activists protest Trump's new welfare restrictions for immigrants in New York City
Activists protest Trump's new welfare restrictions for immigrants in New York City (New York Immigration Coalition | Facebook)
One aspect of the rule change would be to consider any history of receipt of government assistance, from Medicaid and Medicare to food and housing assistance, as “heavily weighed negative factors” when determining whether an applicant should be granted a visa or green card.
This would effectively prevent millions of documented immigrants from applying for government benefits they are legally entitled to. Clinton-era welfare reforms already restrict the availability of public assistance to many legal immigrants, and undocumented immigrants are barred from nearly all assistance programs. Nonetheless, millions of low-income immigrants rely on some type of assistance or another.
The rule would impact everyone — from the parent whose child receives food or medical assistance, to elderly immigrants on Medicare Plan D, to a U.S. citizen seeking to sponsor a spouse or a family member.
But the rule change goes beyond the use of public assistance.
“In determining whether an immigrant would become a public charge, USCIS [U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services] will also consider factors such as age, health, family status, assets, education and skills,” explained immigration attorney Soo Kyung Vitale. “In sum, this is an all-out attack on the poor, the sick and the less educated.”
While certain categories of visa holders will be exempt under the current version of the rule, earlier leaked drafts did not have such exemptions. Thus, the panic among visa holders has been universally felt. Rumors of the proposed change have been circulating since the beginning of the year and have already had a devastating impact. Fear among immigrant communities has led to a significant drop in enrollment for food assistance programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (called WIC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or SNAP, formerly known as food stamps).
On September 24, immigrant rights and social service advocates, led by the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC), staged a rally and direct action in front of New York City’s historic Tenement Museum to protest the proposed rule change.
“We have HIV positive clients consulting counselors on whether they should suspend their HIV medication while they apply for a green card,” said Amanda Lugg of the African Services Committee and one of 14 people arrested blocking traffic to protest the change. She also noted how the proposed change “violates long-standing protections for people living with HIV/AIDS under disability discrimination law” and “essentially operates as a backdoor reinstatement of the HIV immigration ban.”
“If adopted, the rule will create a nationwide health crisis impacting millions and deter families from seeking vital medical care when they need it the most,” said Hasan Shafiqullah of the Immigration Law Unit at the Legal Aid Society.

BY DEFINING anyone who legally accesses these programs as a potential “public charge,” Trump is simultaneously taking aim at low-income Black and Brown immigrants on the one hand and public assistance programs themselves on the other.
The reality is that public assistance has become part and parcel of the U.S. economy and working-class life. According to a 2016 Economic Policy Institute report, a majority of workers making $9.91 an hour or less, or about a fifth of all wage earners, receive some sort of public assistance, either directly or through a family member.
In addition, nearly half of all working recipients of public assistance work full time. In reality, low-wage employers rely on government assistance programs to subsidize and maintain a relatively stable workforce. In 2014 Forbes magazine reported that Walmart’s low wages were costing taxpayers $6.2 billion a year in public assistance to its employees.
As Alison Hirsh, vice president of SEIU Local 32BJ, put it, “With poverty wages, unaffordable health care options and rampant food insecurity across the country, a reliance on public assistance is not a fair indication of how much a person contributes to their communities.”
Along with Trump’s comments denigrating immigrants from “shithole” countries, this current rule change underlines that the primary targets of this attack are low-income Black and Brown immigrants. Trump has no problem with family reunification policies (or in Trumpspeak, “chain migration”) when it allows his in-laws to become citizens, but he wants to bar those he deems “inferior” from taking advantage of those same pathways.
While Democratic Party politicians line up to pose as defenders of immigrant rights, this current assault can be tracked directly to the attacks on both low-income immigrants and government entitlement programs ramped up by the Clinton administration in the ’90s.
And while Mayor Bill de Blasio claims that New York is a sanctuary city, his police department was out in overwhelming force at the NYIC protest and civil disobedience on September 24.
Nonetheless, activists pledged to continue the fight to prevent this new rule from being instituted. Once the rule change is posted to the Federal Register, it is subject to a 60-day public comment period before implementation. Activists need to use this period not only to organize public commentary against the rule, but also to build broad action against this change.
That fight needs to foreground a defense of public assistance in a country where the labor of low-wage workers generates massive profits. Immigrant rights activists have their work cut out for them in order to reverse the decades-long war on immigrants and the poor that has culminated in this moment.

Original article

print print reply reply

A new Q&A interview with NSA whistleblower Tom Drake

To  


Thomas Drake
Here’s an update and fascinating new Q&Ainterview with National Security Agency whistleblower Thomas Drake.

We should remember that the U.S. government’s “national security” apparatus is eager to crush the brave few who expose the official lies that sustain illegal surveillance, fraud, corruption, and warfare. Whether or not the whistleblowers go to prison, a key official goal is to drive them close to the poverty line for the rest of their lives, deprived of pensions and rendered unemployable for all but low-paid jobs.

Thanks to supporters of the RootsAction Education Fund, several of the most selfless and high-impact whistleblowers are now getting back on their financial feet. But we must not fade away with our support.

Millions of taxpayer dollars went into persecuting Tom Drake. It’s now poeticjustice each time someone can make a tax-deductible contribution to Tom’s current work in support of whistleblowing.

During the first years of this decade, Tom Drake endured a legalistic siege that threatened to keep him in prison for the rest of his life. Although he ultimately prevailed in court, the government completely wrecked his personal finances.

As the end of this tax year approaches, you can engage in a bit of poetic justiceif you click here to support Thomas Drake as an NSA whistleblower who continues to speak truth to -- and about -- power. A contribution of whatever you can afford would be deeply appreciated. Half of every dollar you donate will go directly to Tom, while the other half will support the Whistleblowers Public Education Campaign that he chairs.

Thanks a lot!

-- The RootsAction Education Fund team
________________________

Days ago, Tom Drake wrote a message to RootsAction Education Fund supporters and responded to some questions. Here’s what he had to say:

Want to thank you all once again and am most grateful and appreciative for your continuing support as I continue to travel and speak out on a number of critical and contemporary core issues including privacy, digital surveillance, abuse of power and rise of autocratic governance and what I have coined the de-evolution of democracy that we face today (and well into tomorrow) in the U.S. and around the globe in our post 9/11 national security world.

I recently participated in a panel hosted by the Cato Institute in Washington, DC discussing 9/11 lessons learned and unlearned that was moderated by Pat Eddington.

9/11 is always a most difficult day for me, given that I am still very much burdened by the “what if” of history. I know that 9/11 was fully preventable and never should have happened as the government failed to keep almost 3,000 people out of harm’s way that very tragic day.

C-SPAN aired the panel live, and here is the link for all of you interested to view and consider what was discussed, with some Q&A with the audience at the end.

I am also scheduled to participate in an upcoming panel on national security and whistleblowers in New York City on 18 October. (If any one of you are in the area I invite you to attend. Here is the link for more information.)

I also agreed to answer a few questions posed to me by Norman Solomon, below, and encourage you all to respond (via info@rootsaction.org) with further questions and comments and any additional observations you may wish me to consider that I can address and discuss in a future email newsletter.

Q:  A lot of Americans are concerned about the rise of authoritarian government in the U.S. To what extent are issues of surveillance directly related to such concerns?

The rise of autocracy and calls for a more authoritarian government raise real and very troubling concerns about the further abuse of surveillance to erode democracy and our precious rights and freedoms through the monitoring and targeting of dissenters, resisters and activists as well as political opponents and domestic enemies. Surveillance in the hands of authorities is about control and keeping track of people, and in the modern age of digital communications it is enormously tempting to use surveillance for “other” purposes that are far removed from keeping the nation safe.

Q:  Do you think the NSA has significantly changed its domestic activities from the George W. Bush to Obama to Trump presidencies?

I do not. There is clearly a line of succession with respect to domestic surveillance from Bush to Obama and now under Trump. The government willfully violated the Constitution in secret under the banner of national security and the issuance of executive orders and “other” authorities right after 9/11 and put a mass surveillance regime in place protected and hidden by the deepest of state secrets. Several years later Congress passed legislation that effectively legalized what was unlawful, thereby normalizing surveillance and other violations of the Constitution. For example, the USA Freedom Act passed a few years ago under Obama was essentially a face-saving kabuki move that still gave the NSA and other national security agencies and authorities the ability to access vast amounts of data from the telecoms, simply by asking for it with some other changes that were bones tossed to appease the civil liberty advocates and organizations.

Q:  What were the top priorities of NSA leaders that you observed from inside the agency?

The top priorities I observed from NSA leaders during my 6.5 years there as a senior executive were focused on protecting the institution, burying the secrets and covering up any possible or actual wrongdoing committed by NSA, while promoting massive programs that were largely outsourced to contractors.

Q:  How would you rate overall media coverage of the NSA?

NSA is still too often misunderstood by much of the mainstream media press outlets, or they simply recycle talking points. In addition, using former heads of agencies as regular commentators who will more often than not simply protect the more secret institutions of government does not bode well for transparency and openness necessary in a democracy regarding the questionable activities and violations of law and the Constitution committed by their own former agencies.

Q:  How would you rate overall media coverage of civil liberties?

I would rate overall media coverage a bit better than before, but still too often beholden to access press, five-minute sound bites, the addiction to celebrity and personalities as well as tribal partisanship. More independent press has emerged, but having a president of the U.S. call the press the enemy of the people is simply chilling and speaks of autocracy and authoritarianism as well as censorship and suppression. 

Q:  How would you describe the ties and oversight roles of the courts in relation to agencies like the NSA?

The courts have largely avoided the issues raised by the often hidden and secret actions of the national security centric agencies in the U.S. government until more recently during the latter years of the Obama and now the Trump administration. Certain lawsuits (including Jewel v NSA and others) were essentially given new life under Obama due to the Snowden revelations. Recent Supreme Court cases including the Jones and Carpenter cases have placed privacy and the 4th Amendment back in the limelight as indications of checks on the overreach and abuse of executive power, while also giving Congress notice for rolling back existing legislation that has given the executive additional power under the cover of national security. However, real oversight must come from Congress and that is sorely lacking as the oversight committees have devolved into largely serving as lapdogs of the national security establishment instead of their mandated watchdog roles.

Q:  Overall, do you think Americans are too worried about government becoming repressive?

I believe a number of Americans are VERY concerned and worried about the government becoming more repressive. The trend lines are not good. On the other hand, many people are better informed about the dangers of democracy caught up in a dystopian drift that erodes our basic rights and freedoms. Once key freedoms and rights are eroded by a central government it is very difficult to get them back, let alone restore what was lost.

Q:  What would you recommend as some of the most important things that people can do to support civil liberties and constitutional freedoms? 


It is critical that people as in “we the people” are the ultimate defense against the de-evolution of democracy. We are in this together and it is vitally important to act locally to make a difference while considering the long arc of history.

Right now, getting out and voting for candidates seeking office during this election season that align with the inalienable rights we all possess is key, while also supporting directly and indirectly efforts and campaigns that advocate action to preserve our rights and freedoms and highlight the abuse of power, no matter the source.

________________________

PS from the RootsAction Education Fund team:

Truth-telling can be inspirational. Another NSA whistleblower, Edward Snowden, has said: “If there hadn’t been a Thomas Drake, there couldn’t have been an Edward Snowden.”

Meanwhile, Tom Drake remains deeply in financial debt. Ironically, we are in hisdebt -- morally, politically and ethically. We owe him so much because he stood up for civil liberties and human decency.

Let’s continue to help repay that debt to Tom Drake, who exposed extreme mass surveillance by the NSA.

Living in what is supposed to be a democracy, we get vital information because of the courage of whistleblowers.


Tom Drake has no intention of going silent. He wants to keep writing, traveling and speaking out. But he needs our help.

Please make a tax-deductible contribution in support of his work.


Thanks!

GRAPHIC: Sign here button

Please share on Facebook and Twitter.

Background:
>  Daily Beast: “U.S. Intelligence Shuts Down Damning Report on Whistleblower Retaliation”
>  Freedom of the Press Foundation: “Beware of Trump Administration’s Coming Crackdown on Leaks -- and Journalism”
>  Minneapolis Star Tribune: “Former NSA Executive Urges Public Vigilance Against Government Overreach”
>  “The Constitution and Conscience: NSA’s Thomas Drake”: Video of speech on May 2, 2017
>  The Washington Times: “Donald Trump on Edward Snowden: Kill the ‘Traitor’”
>  
Jesselyn Radack, The New York Times"Whistleblowers Deserve Protection Not Prison"
>  
Jane Mayer, The New YorkerThomas Drake -- "The Secret Sharer"


 
Donate buttonFacebook buttonTwitter button

Click here to unsubscribe and stop ALL email from RootsAction.
empowered by Salsa