COMMENTARY
There is an old saying that no news is good news. Whatever the validity of that statement is there is no denying that it is hard to get a focus what to make of latest political news as summer bears down on us. However, here are a few comments –
SHEEEE’S BACK
In May I commented on the decision of courageous anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan to ‘resign’ as the face of the anti-war movement noting that her frustration at the Democratic failure to reverse the direction of the war ‘as advertised’ in the 2006 midterm Congressional elections had driven her to despair. Apparently now she is back and ‘on the low’ is traveling and preparing, if necessary, to oppose herself as a congressional candidate to House Speaker Pelosi in the 2008 elections. The dilemma of Ms. Sheehan graphically illustrates the tremendous political problems associated with the long time dependence on the ‘good’ offices of the Democratic Party, the other party of capitalism, in order to bring about social change. Or in the case of Iraq to even stop the imperialist madness. Militants should not only redouble their efforts to change things but also take a harder look at ways to defeat this Democratic behemoth. That is where the political fight is in America.
WAITING FOR GODOT
Part of Ms. Sheehan’s dilemma stems for the chronic inability to break out from the parliamentary cretinism that we have been confronted with as the solution to the Iraq question. Right now, as Republican office holders, with the apparent bizarre exception of Arizona Senator McCain, are fleeing the U.S.S. Bush like rats from a sinking ship the Democrats are trying to cobble yet another resolution to ‘redeploy’ the troops out of Iraq. But hold on, Dems- we still have the July 15th interim report of the interim report to wait on to see if the situation in Iraq has improved. Of course, that is just the icing on the cake. Everyone is really waiting (delaying) until General Petraeus’ report in September. Hear this now- forget these bogus reports- this Bush Administration will see enough ‘light’ in these documents to continue the current strategy until January 20, 2009. My suggestion to Ms. Sheehan and others is that they get on board and fight for a workers party. That is a great lesson to be learned from all of this.
REQUIEM FOR A SUMMER SOLDIER
We have just passed the celebration of the 4th of July and the usual patriotic hoopla. Readers of this space know of my great, if rather belated, admiration for the winter soldiers at Valley Forge and elsewhere who kept the democratic faith through think and thin. As if to mock such devotion there has been a recent spate of conservative commentary on old time notions of patriotism expressed by ritual display of the flag. Locally this has been expressed in a commentary in the Sunday Boston Globe of July 8, 2007 by Op/Ed contributor Jeff Jacoby. Mr. Jacoby and I have locked horns before but here apparently he is in a lather about the lack of flags displayed in his neighborhood. The inference to be drawn is that those who do not display the flag are not patriotic. Of course, Mr. Jacoby is well known locally as one of the last of about seven supporters in Massachusetts of the current Iraq War. He, on more than one occasion, has expressed his willingness to let some other father’s son or daughter fight on his behalf in this worthless cause. On the other hand he apparently is more than happy to wave the flag in the front of his house. Forget this flag thing, here is the ‘skinny’- until further notice we stand on this idea- yes we love this country- no, we do not love this government. Enough said
THE CLASH OF THE TITANS
Of course no commentary by this writer would be complete without at least a little swipe at that other party of capitalism, the Democrats. If there is one thing that has become apparent this summer it is that the real battle for the Democratic presidential nomination is down to the intergenerational fight between Hillary and Obama ‘The Charma'. In recognition of this the first ‘blood’ was drawn in Iowa last week. Hillary with her man Bill in tow barnstormed through Iowa spreading the Old Gospel news that the good old days of the Bill Clinton Administration were pretty good. Well yes, Bill you were probably better than George Bush. I would not, however, deem that as high praise under the circumstances since George W. Bush makes Millard Fillmore, another accidental president, look good by comparison. As the campaign progresses the “golden age” of the Clintons will be discussed further here. Obama is the new kid on the block and strictly a New Gospel guy and in a not so veiled way has declared that the Emperor (or currently the Empress) has no clothes. Stay tuned to see how this fight develops. It will not be pretty, especially if the race gets closer than it is now. Yes, youth must be served but these ‘guys’ are already old news.
THIS IS PART OF A SERIES OF ARTICLES ON THE 2006-2008 ELECTION CYCLE UNDER THE HEADLINE- FORGET THE DONKEYS, ELEPHANTS, GREENS-BUILD A WORKERS PARTY!
This space is dedicated to the proposition that we need to know the history of the struggles on the left and of earlier progressive movements here and world-wide. If we can learn from the mistakes made in the past (as well as what went right) we can move forward in the future to create a more just and equitable society. We will be reviewing books, CDs, and movies we believe everyone needs to read, hear and look at as well as making commentary from time to time. Greg Green, site manager
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
it's definitely good news about cindy sheehan, hopefully as you comment it will help speed up the process of the formation of a workers party.
ReplyDeleteSeveral liberal sources don't acknowledge Cindy Sheehan breaking from the Dems.
ReplyDeleteIn the US to have a labor party, it would need a pre-revolutionary situation.
@ renegade eye
ReplyDelete"In the US to have a labor party, it would need a pre-revolutionary situation."
Why? Although I could see the arguement if I was talking about a mass revolutionary party, i'm not. I'm talking about a party which may (and should) have a marxist revolutionary current, but would for the most part have ordinary american workers in it. (Then again a pre-revolutionary situation would always help)
I appreciate the large size of the US that makes things somewhat more tricky than on the island i inhabit but i can't see any specific reason why a working class party could not form, even if it was slightly patchy ie only existing in some states and not others.
I tend to agree with Renegade that a workers party will form in a pre-revolutionary situation in America. Remember the workers party slogan is a transitional slogan for places like the United States to help break working people from the capitalist parties. If the future sees a strong outbreak of class struggle then straight recruitment to a revolutionary party may render that slogan inappropriate. See Trotsky's discussion on this with James Cannon and others in the late 1930's.
ReplyDeletei would like to know why you believe a pre-revolutionary situation is necessary however, as neither of you have explained it, rather stated it as 'obvious' then carried on?
ReplyDeleteAlso, weren't there farmer-labour parties in existence in some areas at one point? Have you blogged about this?
Crim- I want to address this question more fully later in a blog but there is a very rich history of small local farmer/labor parties in America. Renegade probably can give more details because Minnesota was the home of one of the most famous and 'successful' ones-the Minnesota Farmer-Labor Party of the 1930's that was eventually joined together with the Demcratic Party and is known for is most famous leader one Hubert H. Humphrey one Vice President of the United States and one of the most savagely abject politicans in American history. By the way we do not favor farmer- labor parties. Look at the whole Comintern discussion in the 1920's centered on America and the previously mentioned works of James Cannon on that situation in America and his role in it as a Communist Party leader. Also check the late Theodore Draper on this in his History of the American Communist Party that I reviewed last year.
ReplyDelete