More Strikes Rock Greece — But how
can the struggle against austerity be won?
|
|
Printer-Friendly E-Mail
This |
|
Nov 20, 2012 By socialistworld.net
|
|
|
An interview with Paris Makrides, Xekinima (Greek CWI)
Yesterday was the first day of another 48 hours general strike. How
big was the strike and protests of the Greek workers and youth?
The strike paralyzed Greece completely. Athens was like a deserted city as
nothing moved except the demonstration of the striking workers. Not only workers
were on strike but small shopkeepers as well, even taxi drivers, who together
with the strike in public transport paralyzed Athens entirely. The picture was
similar in every other city of Greece.
The numbers on the Athens strike demonstration however were not that big, due
to the lack of transport; workers and youth had no means of getting to the
center of Athens other than by foot. Despite this, we estimate that 30,000 to
40,000 people were on the streets of Athens.
Today’s rally at Syntagma Square, which is intended to encircle the
parliament building, where MPs will be voting on the new (third) Memorandum [new
austerity measures at the behest of the Trioka] at 5.00pm, will probably be much
bigger. But there is always an element of uncertainty, as the broad population,
including workers and youth, know that most probably there will be violent
clashes largely between anarchists and provocateurs (secret police agents), on
the one hand, and the riot police, on the other hand. These clashes turn away
the mass of the population from taking part in the demos. If this element did
not exist, we can safely say that this afternoon one million people, if not
more, would be on the streets of Athens surrounding Syntagma Square.
What does the new, third ’Memorandum’ mean for the Greek
people?
The third Memorandum will be a disaster, added to an economy and society
already devastated by the two previous Memorandums.
According to estimations of the Troika [European Union, European Central Bank
and International Monetary Fund], Greece’s GDP will be reduced for a sixth
consecutive year. And public debt, notwithstanding the austerity measures that
have been adopted these last years and “haircut”, for 2013 will reach 346
billion € (189% of GDP) increased by 66 billion since last February!
Over the last years, Greek people have paid much higher taxes, have see their
wages slashed, unemployment has reached 24% and youth unemployment 55% (these
are the official figures). Public health and education have been destroyed and
public services and companies privatized and sold off for peanuts. But European
and Greek capitalists have no interest in the terrible social effects their
policies are having.
The third Memorandum contains new cruel austerity measures, such as increase
on the retirement age to 67 years, massive dismissals of public employees, more
taxes, greater so-called “flexibility” concerning labor relations and
privatizations. And it is clear this will lead to more social misery and
catastrophe, just like the earlier Memorandums.
How do you explain the fact that despite all this huge mobilizations
of the Greek people, the Troika is still able to apply its anti-working class
policies?
The Greek people’s struggles over the last two years have been massive.
People understand that they have to do something to stop the Troika’s policies.
So they participated in general strikes, refused to pay taxes and occupied
squares. People want to resist and fight. On the other hand, the trade union
leaderships don’t. These leaderships don’t want to overthrow the government
because they are tied with the government parties.
The parties of the Left support people’s demands but do not have a plan about
how the capitalist’s policies will be stopped and how the government will fall.
SYRIZA (Coalition of the Radical Left) recently called for new elections. But
elections are not the Left’s primary field of battle at this moment. What is
necessary is an indefinite general strike which, of course, will raise the
question of power in society – who decides, who controls and who manages the
economy and society. This is the only way to go forward, to overthrow the
government, and to pave the way for a government of the Left which will be based
on worker’s power, through democratic rank and file committees and assemblies,
in every workplace, neighborhood, university and school etc.
Is the huge anger of the Greek working class reflected inside the
trade unions?
The role of the leaders of trade union is absolutely exasperating. But
whatever they do they cannot stop the class struggle. People are outraged with
the Troika’s policies. This anger has pushed several rank and file unions and
union federations to call the GSEE and ADEDY (the private and public sector
trade union centers) for an indefinite general strike, as the only reply that
corresponds to the scale of government’s and the Troika’s vicious austerity
attacks.
However, the GSEE and ADEDY refused to call an all-out general strike (which
was to be expected) and the unions calling for this action did not try to take
the next necessary step, which is to co-ordinate actions between themselves; to
prepare for and set a day of strike action and to call on the rest of the union
movement to come out in coordinated, indefinite strike activity. We are
convinced that such an initiative, given the explosive mood in Greek society,
would trigger an avalanche of class action and would push aside the official
union federation leaderships. Militant, mass industrial action, as described,
could maximize workers’ mass pressure against the government and Troika and give
society with a perspective to defeat the attacks.
But what really infuriates working class people and drives them “mad” is that
often breaks on the strikes movement are made by the parties of the Left. For
example, a resolution for at least one week’s strike action was voted down on
the Central Council of the ADEDY federation (civil servants’ union) because of
the votes of the KKE (Communist Party) faction. The resolution for a week’s long
strike had the support of 19 votes, with 17 votes against, but the KKE used its
seven votes to defeat it.
In the journalists’ union, two days ago, a similar role was played by the
SYRIZA faction, which is the biggest faction in that union. The PASOK vote
split, with half supporting the demand of the anti-capitalist Left for
indefinite strike action. But SYRIZA voted, together with the conservative
section of the union, to have only one 24 hour strike and some three hour
stoppages.
These examples show the extent to which the mass parties of the Greek Left
are far behind the needs of the situation and the mood of the working masses.
What impact do these developments have on the political
landscape?
Despite dissatisfaction with the Left, a big section of the population now
regards a new government of the Left as the only hope on the horizon. There is
thus a huge turn in favor of SYRIZA (although opinion polls reveal that Syriza’s
support has not essentially grown, but it is the largest party because support
for the New Democrats, the main party in government, has fallen). But this turn
towards SYRIZA is not enthusiastic. This is not without reason. SYRIZA’s
political platform is not clear. People do not know exactly what SYRIZA is going
to do if it takes the power, and that makes them suspicious. On the other hand,
the KKE (communist party) is continuously isolated from the bulk of the working
class because of its sectarian tactics. The KKE speaks, in general, about the
need for “revolution” and “socialism” but it refuses to link this call, in any
way, to today’s reality and to mass consciousness. On the contrary, the KKE say
that things are not ‘mature enough’ yet for system change. So, in practice, they
have ‘maximum and minimum’ approach (i.e. make radical and general rhetoric for
‘socialism’ etc, while only putting forward minimum demands and without linking
the two concretely), rather than a transitional approach (campaigning on the key
class demands of the day, while linking this up with the need for a workers’
government and to change society). In reality, as we can see from the union
votes mentioned above and other actions, the KKE leadership functions like a
strike breaking force.
Despite SYRIZA’s inadequacies, the struggle for a government of the Left is
what the movement needs to campaign for and this is the approach of Xekinima. Of course, we link this struggle
to the absolute need for a socialist programme and the need to base this on rank
and file assemblies and committees of action. We emphasize that if a government
of the Left, based around SYRIZA, fails to adopt a socialist platform this will
represent a massive defeat for the Greek Left and the working class,
particularly given the fact that the neo-fascist Golden Dawn received around 12%
to 14% in recent polls.
How is Golden Dawn being combated?
The far right, anti-immigrant Golden Dawn is not invincible, however.
Opposition to it is growing. There are many anti-fascist committees being set
up. The mass parties of the Left do not really understand how to tackle the
problem of rising fascism, which requires working class unity, combating the
real danger and propaganda of the far right and also fighting for an end to
cuts, and for jobs, decent homes, a living wage and for decent public services,
health and education for all etc.
But things are changing. In September, every proposal made inside SYRIZA to
create anti-fascist committees (usually made by members of Xekinima who participate in local branches
of SYRIZA) was voted down. In the course of the last week, however, the central
secretariat of SYRIZA changed its stand and is now in favor of anti-fascist
committees. The KKE, on the other hand, makes no such call but it has a
sectarian, abstract approach towards resisting Golden Dawn and the need for a
united front against the far right threat. The KKE continues to live on its own
isolated planet, refusing to understand what is happening around it.
How is the Left responding to the crisis?
SYRIZA is not the only field where developments are taking place. In the rest
of the Left important developments are taking place. It is correct to say that
the Greek Left, in general, is in a state of crisis, which takes different forms
for different parties of the Left. There are splits inside ANTARSYA (the
anti-capitalist Left Alliance); there is a mass exodus from the KKE; there are
major clashes inside SYRIZA as the leadership turns to the right; and the Left
Current of SYNASPISMOS (the main constituent force making up SYRIZA) is reacting
to this rightward turn but without clarity as regards what should be done; and,
of course, the huge mass of Left voters remain outside the Left parties and
formations.
In this context, Xekinima (CWI in
Greece), came together with other forces of the Left, from ANTYARSYA and the
rest of the anti-capitalist Left and we have also linked up with forces inside
SYRIZA, to create the ‘Initiative of the 1000’, as it has become known (1013
individuals signed the launching statement before it became public). This
initiative bases itself on the need for a radical anti-capitalist programme, as
the only way to come out of the devastating social and economic crisis. This
includes calling for a repudiation of the debt, nationalization of the banks and
the commanding heights of the economy, and for a planning of the economy, on the
basis of social needs, and under workers’ control and management. The programme
also calls for a united front of the parties of the Left and for support for a
Left government i.e. a government based around SYRIZA. At the same time, this
means fighting against the reformist programme of the leadership of SYRIZA. The
majority of the leadership think they can manage the crisis better than the
ruling class and do not prioritize fighting to get rid of the capitalist system
and for a socialist society.
The Initiative of the 1000 has only been publicly alive for a few days but it
has already been noted by the whole of the Left. It is an entirely new
innovation, uniting forces from all sections and parties of the Left, on the
same programme and with similar aims for the mass movement in the immediate
period ahead. Its development and potential are not yet clear. But it is
certainly worth the attempt to build the Initiative of the 1000. We will be able
to say more about its role and perspectives in the very near
future.
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment