Spike Lee is a great film maker.
Denzel Washington is a great actor (could any other actor have given the spirit
of Malcolm such a realistic treatment?). That said, something is missing here.
We know that there are various academic revisionist trends in history and
politics that reflect the changing appreciations of latter generations. Film
offers no exception. The missing element here is the struggle going on around
Malcolm as he tries honestly to break out of the Black Nationalist isolation of
the Nation of Islam and articulate what the necessary strategy to drive the
civil rights movement in America
and the revolutionary struggles internationally forward. What is also missing
is the sense that Malcolm, in the early 1960’s stood as the LONE voice of the
rage of the ghettos, against the white establishment and their black hangers-on
like Dr. King. There was a Chinese wall between his calls to break with the
Kennedys, Johnsons and the rest of the Democratic Party, his calls for black
armed self-defense what he rightly called the “Uncle Tom” black establishment
which kowtowed to that white establishment. There still is. No amount of
revisionism will erase that distinction. What those interested in Malcolm need
to do is read his Autobiography of Malcolm X (see all my reviews for my take on
Malcolm) and other books from the 1960’s struggles. Still, this film is a good
primer to learn how the most honest revolutionary black liberation fighter in
20th century America
earned his place in history.
No comments:
Post a Comment