Markin comment:
Ya, I know as well as anybody, at least any radical, revolutionary, or even consistent liberal politico, whatever that is, that we cry no tears over the misdeeds, mishaps, and misplacements of the CIA. At least not since the days of the Pharaohs (which I have on good authority is who they think is in power in Egypt. Go figure). In our left-wing movement, or at least the traditional Trotskyist trend of it, the CIA stands, has stood, and will always stand as the prime example of a counter-revolutionary organization, through and through. Everyone else with claims to that title falls in the rear. So why am I even bothering to mention the recent trials and tribulations over yet another CIA goof-up in not seeing the tidal wave of revolutionary and radical action that has inflamed the Middle East over the past few weeks starting with Tunisia and working its way eastward.
Well, frankly, just to do a little revolutionary tweaking (not the techno-cyberspace thing but the old-fashioned kind) of a hard opponent who is under the gun, rightly under the gun, and its not often that we get a chance to kick the CIA when they are down, so that is a factor as well for good measure. Moreover, while it is no concern of ours I still wonder what the hell are these guys (and it is mainly guys from what I see) doing with that thirty billion plus U.S. dollars per year that the American taxpayers fork out to get "intelligence" so that the various bourgeois governments are not , like right now, blindsided by every whirlwind tsunami, hurricane and political event that happens in the world.
A litany is in order. Ya, the CIA gloated over their "victory" in Afghanistan with the withdrawal of Soviet troops in the late 1980s, and the subsequent fall of the Soviet Union, after supplying what turned out to be the Taliban and Al Queda with weapons to the teeth. I would not, if was them, be bragging about their former buddy Osama Bin Liden- a guy we also have on our "hit" list when we take power. Then there were the various breakdowns with Iraq starting with Bush 41 in 1990. Although the Bush 41 thing was kid's stuff when you think about it. At least compared to Bush 43's "slam dunk" on weapons of mass destruction. I am, however, perfectly willing to "excuse" that one only because the "boss ordered the data fudged if only someone would admit that little fact. And now missing the recent tidal wave that any graduate student working on a Middle East dissertation could have told them about for free (or maybe the price of tuition).
So you can see why I am in a quandary about where all the dough is going. Look. I always like a good intriguing Graham Green spy story. But that is fiction, or mainly fiction. What I think is happening is that these guys (again, mainly) are spending the dough in some Casbah bar, fans whirling to cool everybody, well every imperial agent somebody, from the hot desert winds. That I could understand. And that will have to do until the real day of reckoning comes. But for now we best build workers parties to fight for workers governments (allied with peasants and others in the Middle East) everywhere. And pronto-these explosive situations, CIA missed or not, don't come all that often
Showing posts with label anit-imperialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anit-imperialism. Show all posts
Saturday, February 05, 2011
Saturday, December 18, 2010
*Another Look-From "YouTube"- December 16, 2010-The Resistance Begins- The Winter Soldiers Lead The Way
Click on the headline to link to a YouTube film clip of the December 16, 2010 veteran-led civil disobedience action at the White House in opposition to Obama's wars.
Markin comment:
This is another easy one-Obama-Immediate, Unconditional Withdrawal Of All U.S./Allied Troops From Afghanistan And Iraq! Not One Penny, Not One Person For These Imperial Wars!
Markin comment:
This is another easy one-Obama-Immediate, Unconditional Withdrawal Of All U.S./Allied Troops From Afghanistan And Iraq! Not One Penny, Not One Person For These Imperial Wars!
Tuesday, December 07, 2010
*From The Pen Of Vladimir Lenin- On Open Diplomacy-Speech at a Joint Meeting of the Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies and Delegates From the Fronts (November, 1917)
Markin comment:
In a post earlier today I noted in a commentary on Wikileaks the open diplomacy policy of the early Bolsheviks in 1917. Here is a sample from the pen of Vladimir Lenin
******
V. I. Lenin
Speech at a Joint Meeting of the Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies and Delegates From the Fronts
November 4 (17), 1917
Delivered: 4 November, 1917
First Published: Pravda No. 181, 18 November 1917; Published according to Pravda text.
Source:Lenin’s Collected Works, Progress Publishers, Moscow, Volume 26, 1972, pp. 294-296
Translated: Yuri Sdobnikov and George Hanna, Edited by George Hanna
Transcription & HTML Markup: Charles Farrell and David Walters
Online Version: Lenin Internet Archive November, 2000
Newspaper Report
I am unable to make a long speech; I can merely outline the new government’s position, programme and tasks.
You are aware that there was a unanimous demand for a policy of peace, for an immediate offer of peace. There is not a single bourgeois minister in the whole of Europe, including this country, who has not promised peace; the soldiers of Russia have found these speeches to be false; they were promised a policy of peace, but no peace was offered and instead they were driven into an offensive. We believed it to be our government’s first duty to offer an immediate peace, and this has been done.
Comrade Lenin sets forth the terms on which the new government has proposed peace, and. adds: If the powers keep their colonies, there will never be an end to this war. What is the way out? There is only one: it is for the workers’ and peasants’ revolution to defeat capital. We never promised that the war could be ended at one stroke, by driving bayonets into ground. War springs from the clash of fortunes running to thousands of millions, which have divided up the world, and if the war is to be brought to an end, the power of capital must be destroyed.
Comrade Lenin speaks on the transfer of power to the Soviets, and declares that we have witnessed a new phenomenon: the peasants refuse to believe that all power belongs to the Soviets, they are still expecting something else from the government and forget that the Soviet is not a private but a state institution. We declare that we want a new state, that the Soviet must replace the old officialdom, and that all the people must learn to govern. You should stand up to your full stature and straighten your backs, and then you need have no fear of threats. The officer cadets tried to engineer an uprising but we were able to deal with them; they organised a bloodbath in Moscow and shot soldiers on the Kremlin wall. But when the people won out, they let the enemy keep not only their military honour but also their arms.
The Vikzhel has threatened a strike, but we shall turn to the masses and ask them whether they want to go on strike and starve the soldiers at the front and the people in the rear, and I am sure that the railway proletariat won’t have it. We are accused of making arrests. Indeed, we have made arrests; today we arrested the director of the State Bank. We are accused of resorting to terrorism, but we have not resorted, and I hope will not resort, to the terrorism of the French revolutionaries who guillotined unarmed men. I hope we shall not resort to it, because we have strength on our side. When we arrested anyone we told him we would let him go if he gave us a written promise not to engage in sabotage. Such written promises have been given. Our fault is that the Soviet organisation has not yet learned to govern, and that there are far too many meetings. Let the Soviets form teams and get down to the business of government. Our task is to advance to socialism. A few days ago the workers received the law on the control of production[1] which makes the factory committee a state institution. The workers must implement this law immediately. They will supply the peasants with cloth andiron, and the peasants will give them grain. I just saw a comrade from Ivanovo-Voznesensk, and he told me this was the main thing. Socialism means keeping account of everything. You will have socialism if you take stock of every piece of iron and cloth. We need engineers for production, and we value their labour highly. We shall be glad to pay them. We do not intend, at the moment, to deprive them of their privileged position. We value everyone who is willing to work but he must not behave as a boss but as an equal, under workers’ control. We have no feeling of animosity for individuals, and we shall try to help them fit into the new pattern.
As for the peasants we say: help the working peasant, spare the middle peasant, compel the rich peasant to pay. After the October 25 Revolution we were threatened with destruction. Some were scared and wanted to escape power, but we were not destroyed. This was because our enemies could find support only from the officer cadets, whereas we had the people on our side. But for the massive drive by the soldiers and workers, power would never have dropped from the hands that held it. Power passed to the Soviets, which are organisations giving the people full freedom. We, the Soviet Government, have received our powers from the Congress of Soviets and, confident of your support, we shall continue to act as we have acted. We have not excluded anyone. The Mensheviks and the Socialist-Revolutionaries have gone, but that is a crime on their part. We invited the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries to take part in the government, but they refused. We do not want any bargaining over power, we don’t want any bids or counterbids. We shall keep the City Council away from power because it is a Kornilovite centre. Some say we are isolated. The bourgeoisie has surrounded us with an atmosphere of lies and slander, but I have yet to see the soldier who is not enthusiastic over the Soviets having taken power. I have yet to see the peasant who opposes the Soviets. There must be an alliance of the poor peasants and the workers, and socialism will triumph the world over. (Members of the Soviet rise, and give Lenin a stormy ovation as he leaves.)
Footnotes
[1] See Draft Decree on Workers’s Control
In a post earlier today I noted in a commentary on Wikileaks the open diplomacy policy of the early Bolsheviks in 1917. Here is a sample from the pen of Vladimir Lenin
******
V. I. Lenin
Speech at a Joint Meeting of the Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies and Delegates From the Fronts
November 4 (17), 1917
Delivered: 4 November, 1917
First Published: Pravda No. 181, 18 November 1917; Published according to Pravda text.
Source:Lenin’s Collected Works, Progress Publishers, Moscow, Volume 26, 1972, pp. 294-296
Translated: Yuri Sdobnikov and George Hanna, Edited by George Hanna
Transcription & HTML Markup: Charles Farrell and David Walters
Online Version: Lenin Internet Archive November, 2000
Newspaper Report
I am unable to make a long speech; I can merely outline the new government’s position, programme and tasks.
You are aware that there was a unanimous demand for a policy of peace, for an immediate offer of peace. There is not a single bourgeois minister in the whole of Europe, including this country, who has not promised peace; the soldiers of Russia have found these speeches to be false; they were promised a policy of peace, but no peace was offered and instead they were driven into an offensive. We believed it to be our government’s first duty to offer an immediate peace, and this has been done.
Comrade Lenin sets forth the terms on which the new government has proposed peace, and. adds: If the powers keep their colonies, there will never be an end to this war. What is the way out? There is only one: it is for the workers’ and peasants’ revolution to defeat capital. We never promised that the war could be ended at one stroke, by driving bayonets into ground. War springs from the clash of fortunes running to thousands of millions, which have divided up the world, and if the war is to be brought to an end, the power of capital must be destroyed.
Comrade Lenin speaks on the transfer of power to the Soviets, and declares that we have witnessed a new phenomenon: the peasants refuse to believe that all power belongs to the Soviets, they are still expecting something else from the government and forget that the Soviet is not a private but a state institution. We declare that we want a new state, that the Soviet must replace the old officialdom, and that all the people must learn to govern. You should stand up to your full stature and straighten your backs, and then you need have no fear of threats. The officer cadets tried to engineer an uprising but we were able to deal with them; they organised a bloodbath in Moscow and shot soldiers on the Kremlin wall. But when the people won out, they let the enemy keep not only their military honour but also their arms.
The Vikzhel has threatened a strike, but we shall turn to the masses and ask them whether they want to go on strike and starve the soldiers at the front and the people in the rear, and I am sure that the railway proletariat won’t have it. We are accused of making arrests. Indeed, we have made arrests; today we arrested the director of the State Bank. We are accused of resorting to terrorism, but we have not resorted, and I hope will not resort, to the terrorism of the French revolutionaries who guillotined unarmed men. I hope we shall not resort to it, because we have strength on our side. When we arrested anyone we told him we would let him go if he gave us a written promise not to engage in sabotage. Such written promises have been given. Our fault is that the Soviet organisation has not yet learned to govern, and that there are far too many meetings. Let the Soviets form teams and get down to the business of government. Our task is to advance to socialism. A few days ago the workers received the law on the control of production[1] which makes the factory committee a state institution. The workers must implement this law immediately. They will supply the peasants with cloth andiron, and the peasants will give them grain. I just saw a comrade from Ivanovo-Voznesensk, and he told me this was the main thing. Socialism means keeping account of everything. You will have socialism if you take stock of every piece of iron and cloth. We need engineers for production, and we value their labour highly. We shall be glad to pay them. We do not intend, at the moment, to deprive them of their privileged position. We value everyone who is willing to work but he must not behave as a boss but as an equal, under workers’ control. We have no feeling of animosity for individuals, and we shall try to help them fit into the new pattern.
As for the peasants we say: help the working peasant, spare the middle peasant, compel the rich peasant to pay. After the October 25 Revolution we were threatened with destruction. Some were scared and wanted to escape power, but we were not destroyed. This was because our enemies could find support only from the officer cadets, whereas we had the people on our side. But for the massive drive by the soldiers and workers, power would never have dropped from the hands that held it. Power passed to the Soviets, which are organisations giving the people full freedom. We, the Soviet Government, have received our powers from the Congress of Soviets and, confident of your support, we shall continue to act as we have acted. We have not excluded anyone. The Mensheviks and the Socialist-Revolutionaries have gone, but that is a crime on their part. We invited the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries to take part in the government, but they refused. We do not want any bargaining over power, we don’t want any bids or counterbids. We shall keep the City Council away from power because it is a Kornilovite centre. Some say we are isolated. The bourgeoisie has surrounded us with an atmosphere of lies and slander, but I have yet to see the soldier who is not enthusiastic over the Soviets having taken power. I have yet to see the peasant who opposes the Soviets. There must be an alliance of the poor peasants and the workers, and socialism will triumph the world over. (Members of the Soviet rise, and give Lenin a stormy ovation as he leaves.)
Footnotes
[1] See Draft Decree on Workers’s Control
**Blessed Are The Whisteblowers- Hands Off Wikileaks!
Click on the headline to link to an Associated Press article on the arrest of master whistleblower and Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange.
Markin comment:
This one is tricky for leftists in separating out the parts. We appreciate, deeply appreciate, the work of Wikileaks in exposing the insanity of the Afghanistan War and also for providing us amusing, if embarrassing, moments in the lives of the international diplomatic corps and of their duplicities. We have always called for open diplomacy, at least since the early days of the Russian revolution in 1917 when the Bolsheviks, on taking state power, blew open the democratic pretensions of the Entente by publishing the “understandings” between the various partners, including Russia, to divide up the spoils of war if victorious against the Central powers. We also have hailed Daniel Ellsberg’s expose of the criminality of the Vietnam War in his Pentagon Papers. And the other, too few, whistleblowers, known and unknown, who help keep civilization from being totally overwhelmed by the power-mad imperialists. As for Julian Assange’s personal dilemma on the charges of sexual misconduct that is a separate question, although from the look of it right now something is very fishy. In any case work the work of Wikileaks needs to go on unimpeded. Naturally the events of the past few weeks by various governments have us all looking over our shoulders in order to make us afraid to speak out against the plentiful inequities of the world, and that is how the imperialists want it. The hell with that. Hands Off Wikileaks!
Markin comment:
This one is tricky for leftists in separating out the parts. We appreciate, deeply appreciate, the work of Wikileaks in exposing the insanity of the Afghanistan War and also for providing us amusing, if embarrassing, moments in the lives of the international diplomatic corps and of their duplicities. We have always called for open diplomacy, at least since the early days of the Russian revolution in 1917 when the Bolsheviks, on taking state power, blew open the democratic pretensions of the Entente by publishing the “understandings” between the various partners, including Russia, to divide up the spoils of war if victorious against the Central powers. We also have hailed Daniel Ellsberg’s expose of the criminality of the Vietnam War in his Pentagon Papers. And the other, too few, whistleblowers, known and unknown, who help keep civilization from being totally overwhelmed by the power-mad imperialists. As for Julian Assange’s personal dilemma on the charges of sexual misconduct that is a separate question, although from the look of it right now something is very fishy. In any case work the work of Wikileaks needs to go on unimpeded. Naturally the events of the past few weeks by various governments have us all looking over our shoulders in order to make us afraid to speak out against the plentiful inequities of the world, and that is how the imperialists want it. The hell with that. Hands Off Wikileaks!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)