From The American Left History Blog Archives (2006)
- On American Political Discourse
Markin comment:
In the period 2006-2008 I, in
vain, attempted to put some energy into analyzing the blossoming American
presidential campaign since it was to be, as advertised at least, a watershed
election, for women, blacks, old white anglos, latinos, youth, etc. In the
event I had to abandon the efforts in about May of 2008 when it became obvious,
in my face obvious, that the election would be a watershed only for those who really
believed that it would be a watershed election. The four years of the Obama
presidency, the 2012 American presidential election campaign, and world
politics have only confirmed in my eyes that that abandonment was essentially
the right decision at the right time. In short, let the well- paid bourgeois
commentators go on and on with their twitter. I, we, had (have) better things
to do like fighting against the permanent wars, the permanent war economies,
the struggle for more and better jobs, and for a workers party that fights for
a workers government . More than enough to do, right? Still a look back at some
of the stuff I wrote then does not a bad feel to it. Read on.
************VOTE FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL TICKET OF ASSATA SHAKUR/LYNNE STEWART IN NOVEMBER OF 2008
COMMENTARY
BY ALL MEANS LET US HAVE A WOMAN PRESIDENT BUT NOT “THAT”
WOMAN
FORGET DONKEYS, ELEPHANTS AND GREENS- BUILD A WORKERS
PARTY
Well the dust has finally
settled on the broken down electoral campaign of 2006 and now we can get down
to the really fun part of commenting on the endless campaign for president in
2008. And it ain’t going to be pretty. Let us face it any political system that
can do no better than provide the perfecta of Bush-Clinton, their families,
their near and distant relatives, their pets, etc. every four years deserves
all the problems it gets. Talk about the modern day parliamentary equivalent of
the War of the Roses this nonsense has got to stop. And this writer is just the,
as always to provide a constructive alternative to the nastiness of bourgeois
choices and politics. Here goes.
For those unfamiliar with
Lynne Stewart or her case the following is a note from the Partisan Defense
Committee which supports the efforts to get her conviction overturned:
“On June 19, Lynne Stewart's counsel filed court papers seeking to discover if any warrantless or illegal electronic surveillance was conducted on her or anyone involved in her case. Then on July 5, Lynne's attorneys filed a Sentencing Memorandum on her behalf asking for a non-custodial sentence, i.e., one involving no jail time. As you are aware, Lynne Stewart was falsely convicted of material support for terrorism for her work representing an imprisoned client, Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, a direct attack on the right to an attorney and First Amendment rights for all. She is also recovering from surgery for breast cancer and subsequent radiation and hormone therapy. Currently she awaits sentencing on September 25 to be preceded by a rally at Riverside Church in New York on September 24. We say again her conviction and those of her co-defendants were an outrage. Hands Off Lynne Stewart, Mohamed Yousry and Ahmed Abdel Sattar!”
Since the above information
was published in an earlier blog Ms. Stewart has received a 28 month sentence.
Her co-defendant Mohamed Yoursy has received a sentence of 20 months. Her other
co-defendant Ahmed Sattar has received an outrageous sentence of 24 years. For
further information contact the PDC, P.O. Box 99, Canal Street Station, New
York, NY 10013-0099, The Lynne Stewart Defense Fund or see my blog, dated June
13, 2006.
Assata Shakur, Tupac’s
“Auntie”, is a revolutionary black fighter for justice who was convicted for
murder in the 1970’s and later escaped to Cuba where she now resides in
political asylum. Over the past year the United States Justice Department has
increased its bounty on her up to one million dollars. To this writer’s mind
that makes her quality presidential material in these times.
Let me motive these
candidacies a little further. I will merely freshen up some of the material I
used in earlier blogs (see November 2006 archives) to motivate a write in vote
for Lynne Stewart in the United States Senate race in New York against Hillary
Clinton. Some will say Ms. Stewart and Ms. Shaker have been convicted of
serious felonies. Grow up! If we counted all the indicted felons, unindicted
co-conspirators, and those waiting for or in fear of indictment hanging around
Washington the Congressional pages would be the only ones left to run the
government. Hell, maybe, they are? Besides, think about this- imagine the
respect Ms. Stewart and Ms. Shakur would get from those federal district court
judges and appeals court judges if they had the power to vote on their
nominations and impeachments.
Hillary “Hawk”, Assata Shakur
and Lynne Stewart are women. Moreover,
Ms. Shakur is a black woman. I did not want to incur the wrath of my feminist
friends by proposing a man for president. After all we need women to break down
the doors to the historic men’s club atmosphere of the United States Presidency.
True enough, but as I have pointed out before in regard to Senator Clinton,
she, and in this she is not alone, stands for the proposition that for all the
virtues of the fight for the equality of women over the past decades women can
have politics just as ugly as men. Some victory.
But, some will argue, Hillary
is a progressive and we do not want to divide the progressive forces, etc.,
etc. Get over it! Yes, Hillary was a “progressive”, or what passed for such at
Wellesley when she got uppity in her valedictorian speech. But, hell that was a
long, long time ago. Since that time she has adhered to classic Clintonian
Democratic Party centrism. Translation- she stays as close as close to the
Republicans as possible without wearing an elephant on her lapel. Unfortunately
for her the Republican Party these days is to the right of Genghis Khan
(although that may be a slander on Mr. Khan because, as recently reported on
the occasion of the 800th anniversary of his birth, the Mongolian
nationalists are currently touting his progressive nature for the times-talk
about revisionism). But, let’s get to the bottom line- Hillary is operating in
the coin of the realm of bourgeois politics- looking out for the main chance.
Lynne and Assata have spent their careers on behalf of the voiceless and
unrepresented- looking to give people a fighting chance. More, much more on
this issue later.
DISCLAIMER: FOR ALL INTERESTED PARTIES- IN ORDER NOT
TO BE ACCCUSED OF GIVING MATERIAL AID TO THOSE WHO GAVE MATERIAL AID TO THOSE
WHO GAVE MATERIAL AID, ETC. THIS WRITER STATES THAT THIS ENDORSEMENT OF MS.
STEWART AND MS. SHAKUR IS UNSOLICITED. I DO NOT KNOW MS. STEWART OR MS. SHAKUR
PERSONALLY AND HAVE NOT COMMUNICATED WITH THEM ABOUT THESE CANDIDACIES. WE
BREATH THE SAME POLITICAL AIR- AND BELIEVE ME THAT ACCRUES ALL TO MY
BENEFIT.
No comments:
Post a Comment