DEFEATED, BUT
UNBOWED-THE WRITINGS OF LEON TROTSKY, 1929-1940
BOOK REVIEWS
If you are interested in the history of the International Left in the first half of the 20th century or are a militant trying to understand some of the past lessons of our history concerning the communist response to various social and labor questions this book is for you. I have reviewed elsewhere Trotsky’s writings published under the title The Left Opposition, 1923-1929 (in three volumes) dealing with Trotsky’s internal political struggles for power inside the Russian Communist Party (and by extension, the political struggles inside the Communist International) in order to save the Russian Revolution. This book is part of a continuing series of volumes in English of his writings from his various points of external exile from 1929 up until his death in 1940. These volumes were published by the organization that James P. Cannon, early American Communist Party and later Trotskyist leader founded, the Socialist Workers Party, during the 1970’s and 1980’s. (Cannon’s writings in support of Trotsky’s work are reviewed elsewhere in this space). Look in the archives in this space for other related reviews on and by this important world communist leader.
To set the framework for these reviews I will give a little personal, political and organizational sketch of the period under discussion. After that I will highlight some of the writings from each volume that are of continuing interest. Reviewing such compilations is a little hard to get a handle on as compared to single subject volumes of Trotsky’s writing but, hopefully, they will give the reader a sense of the range of this important revolutionary’s writings.
After the political defeat of the various Trotsky-led Left Oppositions 1923 to 1929 by Stalin and his state and party bureaucracy he nevertheless found it far too dangerous to keep Trotsky inMoscow . He therefore had Trotsky placed in internal
exile at Ata Alma in the Soviet Far East in 1928. Even that turned out to be
too much for Stalin’s tastes and in 1929 he arranged for the external exile of
Trotsky to Turkey .
Although Stalin probably rued the day that he did it this exile was the first
of a number of places which Trotsky found himself in external exile. Other
places included, France , Norway and, finally, Mexico where he was assassinated by
a Stalinist agent in 1940. As these volumes, and many others from this period
attest to, Trotsky continued to write on behalf of a revolutionary perspective.
Damn, did he write. Some, including a few of his biographers, have argued that
he should have given up the struggle, retired to who knows where, and acted the
role of proper bourgeois writer or professor. Please! These volumes scream out
against such a fate, despite the long odds against him and his efforts on
behalf of international socialist revolution. Remember this is a revolutionary
who had been through more exiles and prisons than one can count easily, held
various positions of power and authority in the Soviet state and given the vicissitudes
of his life could reasonably expect to return to power with a new revolutionary
upsurge. Personally, I think Trotsky liked and was driven harder by the long
odds.
The political prospects for socialist revolution in the period under discussion are, to say the least, rather bleak, or ultimately turned out that way. The post-World War I revolutionary upsurge has dissipated leaving SovietRussia
isolated. Various other promising revolutionary situations, most notably the
aborted German revolution of 1923 that would have gone a long way to saving the
Russian Revolution, had come to nought. In the period under discussion there is
a real sense of defensiveness about the prospects for revolutionary change. The
specter of fascism loomed heavily and we know at what cost to the international
working class. The capitulation to fascism by the German Communist and Social
Democratic Parties in 1933, the defeat of the heroic Austrian working class in 1934, the
defeat in Spain in 1939, and the outlines of the impending Second World War
colored all political prospects, not the least Trotsky’s.
Organizationally, Trotsky developed two tactical orientations. The first was a continuation of the policy of the Left Opposition during the 1920’s. The International Left Opposition as it cohered in 1930 still acted as an external and unjustly expelled faction of the official Communist parties and of the Communist International and oriented itself to winning militants from those organizations. After the debacle inGermany in 1933 a call for new national
parties and a new, fourth, international became the organizational focus. Many
of the volumes here contain letters, circulars, and manifestos around these
orientations. The daunting struggle to create an international cadre and to gain
some sort of mass base animate many of the writings collected in this series.
Many of these pieces show Trotsky’s unbending determination to make a
breakthrough. That these effort were, ultimately, militarily defeated during
the course of World War Two does not take away from the grandeur of the efforts.
Hats off to Leon Trotsky.
THE WRITINGS OF LEON TROTSKY, 1930-31, PATHFINDER PRESS,NEW YORK , 1973
As to the 1930-31 volume this reviewer recommends a careful reading of the following articles: On the Question of Thermidor and Bonapartism, (taken from analogies with the French Revolution which nicely draws the distinctions between the overturn of the revolutionary leadership and the balancing act implied in a military dictatorship); Thermidor and Bonapartism (same); Problems of the German Section (on the ever reoccurring problem of German Left Oppositionists taking serious political action toward the rank and file of the German Communist Party before it is too late);New Zigzags and New Dangers (on the notorious ‘third period’ strategy of the Communist International); and, At the Fresh Grave of Kote Tsintsadze, (probably one of the best and most insightful political obituaries of a fellow revolutionary ever written).
BOOK REVIEWS
If you are interested in the history of the International Left in the first half of the 20th century or are a militant trying to understand some of the past lessons of our history concerning the communist response to various social and labor questions this book is for you. I have reviewed elsewhere Trotsky’s writings published under the title The Left Opposition, 1923-1929 (in three volumes) dealing with Trotsky’s internal political struggles for power inside the Russian Communist Party (and by extension, the political struggles inside the Communist International) in order to save the Russian Revolution. This book is part of a continuing series of volumes in English of his writings from his various points of external exile from 1929 up until his death in 1940. These volumes were published by the organization that James P. Cannon, early American Communist Party and later Trotskyist leader founded, the Socialist Workers Party, during the 1970’s and 1980’s. (Cannon’s writings in support of Trotsky’s work are reviewed elsewhere in this space). Look in the archives in this space for other related reviews on and by this important world communist leader.
To set the framework for these reviews I will give a little personal, political and organizational sketch of the period under discussion. After that I will highlight some of the writings from each volume that are of continuing interest. Reviewing such compilations is a little hard to get a handle on as compared to single subject volumes of Trotsky’s writing but, hopefully, they will give the reader a sense of the range of this important revolutionary’s writings.
After the political defeat of the various Trotsky-led Left Oppositions 1923 to 1929 by Stalin and his state and party bureaucracy he nevertheless found it far too dangerous to keep Trotsky in
The political prospects for socialist revolution in the period under discussion are, to say the least, rather bleak, or ultimately turned out that way. The post-World War I revolutionary upsurge has dissipated leaving Soviet
Organizationally, Trotsky developed two tactical orientations. The first was a continuation of the policy of the Left Opposition during the 1920’s. The International Left Opposition as it cohered in 1930 still acted as an external and unjustly expelled faction of the official Communist parties and of the Communist International and oriented itself to winning militants from those organizations. After the debacle in
THE WRITINGS OF LEON TROTSKY, 1930-31, PATHFINDER PRESS,
As to the 1930-31 volume this reviewer recommends a careful reading of the following articles: On the Question of Thermidor and Bonapartism, (taken from analogies with the French Revolution which nicely draws the distinctions between the overturn of the revolutionary leadership and the balancing act implied in a military dictatorship); Thermidor and Bonapartism (same); Problems of the German Section (on the ever reoccurring problem of German Left Oppositionists taking serious political action toward the rank and file of the German Communist Party before it is too late);New Zigzags and New Dangers (on the notorious ‘third period’ strategy of the Communist International); and, At the Fresh Grave of Kote Tsintsadze, (probably one of the best and most insightful political obituaries of a fellow revolutionary ever written).
No comments:
Post a Comment