Dear
Al,
The
United States has been bombing Iraq off and on (mostly on) for about
twenty-three, yes 23, years.
Has
it worked? Is Iraq peaceful, stable, secure? Have we eliminated potential
threats to the U.S. and our allies, or have we exacerbated them?
Has
U.S. military engagement in the region, whether by bombing, invasion, occupation
or providing weapons transfers and military aid, been effective?
I
think “abject failure” is the only way to describe U.S. policy.
Can
we afford to keep doing this, at an exorbitant cost, when it’s been so
spectacularly unsuccessful, and we have such pressing needs in our communities
that need our attention and our tax dollars?
President
Obama has spoken wisely about the limits of U.S. military might to solve the
problems in Iraq and the Middle East, and rules out a large troop presence on
the ground, yet U.S. military actions in Iraq are escalating, and the mad
momentum of war often defies presidential good intentions.
Last
month the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed H. Con. Res. 105 stating clearly there is no legal authority
for U.S. military involvement in Iraq without express Congressional approval.
The Senate needs to do the same.
Peace,
Salaam, Shalom,
Kevin
Martin Executive Director Peace Action
P.S.
-The Constitution grants Congress, not the president, authority over decisions
to engage in war. Write your senators today and tell them to end the bombing of
Iraq. Enough is enough.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment