In
Search Of Sam Spade-Dashiell Hammett’s Nightmare Town-A Book Review
Book
Review
By
Sam Lowell
Dashiell
Hammett: Nightmare Town, edited by Kirby McCauley, Martin Greenberg, and Ed
Gorman, 1999
In
an earlier review of some of Dashiell Hammett’s less familiar work to be
mentioned below I noted that there was no question most crime detection writers,
readers too, since the 1920s or so owe, whether they acknowledge the fact or
not, a huge debt of gratitude to pioneer hard-boiled private detective crime
detection writer Dashiell Hammett (Raymond Chandler and a few other associated
with the Black Mask magazine too but let’s stick with Hammett here since
we are reviewing a book about him and his early work). Owe it as well whether
they followed his model or not (and most have done so one way or another
whether creating detective books or creating for the screen detectives). His
model of detectives who unlike previous models were made of ordinary clay, did
their detection, their job as a business, as a livelihood rather than as an
amateur sport while clipping stocks and bonds coupons, got in trouble with the
public cops as much as work with them (or picked up their leavings when they
dumped the case in the cold files), had a work-a-day code of conduct which was
more or less followed, chased after a few windmills, and made almost every
mistake in the book pursuing that blind-folded lady with the slightly- tipped
scales. Grabbed a few dames, you know frails, in the a bargain.
In
many ways Sam Spade, the private eye extraordinaire of The Maltese Falcon, who
had a trial run in this compilation under review, Nightmare Town, in three short stories is the epitome of that model
which Hammett developed. Working out of a fly-by-night no front office in
Frisco town with his soon to be late partner Miles Archer Sam got mixed up in
plenty of drama despite his low-key workaday manner. (Archer a partner that he
hated, hated so much he had Archer’s name taken off the office door right after
his murder and partner whose wife, to his subsequent regret, he was playing
around with). Naturally when a dame, not Archer’s wife but a serious piece of
work, entered into the picture there are bound to be problems, especially if
she is a femme fatale like Brigid.
But Sam bought the ticket, took the ride. Played his hand very close to the
vest when the bodies started piling up and all led to the pursuit of some
stupid bird, some stuff that dreams were made of.
But
here is where Hammett broke the new ground. Sam was something of a windmill
chaser, needed to see some justice for old Miles who fell in the line of duty
when all was said and done. Worked that moral code closely too, that code that
said if you are doing private detection as a business then you had better not
be addled by some lying skirt and her confederates if only because leaving
something un-avenged is bad for business, bad for the profession. Here’s the
beautiful part though once he tagged Brigid as the body-counter, once he figured
that playing along with her would be a lifetime of looking over his shoulder.
He let her take the tumble, take the big step off since she tried to play him
for a sap. Made the cops look silly too when they tried to frame him and he
gave them the case all tied up in a bow without their help. Yeah, Sam had all
the angles covered.
Creating
fictional detectives (or any characters that will draw an interest from the
reading or film public) that break the mold did not come out of thin air but
was a process started from Hammett’s first writings in the early 1920s when he
got serious about writing stories as a profession (after being a number of
things including soldier in World War I and a Pinkerton private detective
himself. I recently reviewed a book, Dashiell Hammett: Lost Stories, that
detailed through some long forgotten early stories (as of 2005) the history of
those early efforts, how they acted as a catalyst to the later more famous work
like those produced here and in the process provided a very impressive
chronology of their literary history (and the ups and downs of Hammett getting
his work published as well).
Most Hammett
aficionados know that his reputation rests mainly on The Maltese Falcon, The
Thin Man, three other novels, the Continental Op series and a bunch of
detective stories in the famous Black Mask magazine and that output
occurred in a relatively short span from the early 1920s to about the early
1940s and then he sort of fell off the earth as far as his new literary
production went (he died in 1961). The stories in this compilation represent a
further maturation of his work and of his characters, particular Spade and the
Thin Man. In that earlier review the editor (Vince Emery) created charts
throughout the book which featured what he called Hammett-isms, literary
devices, mannerisms, commonly used expressions and the like Hammett used which
showed something I had suspected is true of most writers who have published
more than a couple of works-they stand by, one may say fall in love with, some
tried and try concepts throughout their careers. These stories confirm a lot of
those classic Hammett-isms noted by Emery.
It
is interesting to see even in these later stories how Hammett was writing about
ordinary people for ordinary people. Making his detectives working stuffs like
in the real world. Creating believable situations, moral and professional, that
real detectives might confront (with a little literary license of course to
spice up the drama). And created characters who placed him in the pantheon of
American literature in the twentieth century. In the Lost Stories review I asked the generic question that any more
specialized work begs-Do you need to this book? There I said no. You needed to read the five major
novels first and you had better make The Maltese Falcon the first one if
you want to know what it was like to be present at the creation of the
hard-boiled private detective, know what it was like when men and women wrote
such works for keeps. Then when you became a Hammett aficionado grab that book.
That is even truer here with Nightmare
Town.
No comments:
Post a Comment