Sunday, March 03, 2013

When Congress agreed on automatic slash-and-burn spending cuts in 2011—if no big bipartisan deficit reduction package could be achieved—the cuts were designed to be so unpalatable that Republicans and Democrats would feel compelled to concoct a better deal to replace them. President Barack Obama says avoiding the deep cuts, called sequestration in DC-speak, should be a "no-brainer." But Republicans are increasingly saying the sequester won't be so bad. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) said Thursday that the $85 billion in cuts "would really help a long way and get us on a sustainable fiscal path."
One problem is that many poor Americans rely on services the government provides. The White House released a report Sunday emphasizing the ways in which the cuts will hurt the middle class, but although important entitlement programs such as Medicaid, Social Security, and food stamps are exempt from sequestration, many programs for low-income families are on the chopping block. Here are 12 of them:
Public housing subsidies: $1.9 billion in cuts would affect 125,000 low-income people who would lose access to vouchers to help them with their rent.
Foreclosure prevention: 75,000 fewer people would receive foreclosure prevention, rental, and homeless counseling services.
Emergency housing: 100,000 formerly homeless people could be removed from their current emergency shelters.
Educational programs: Learning programs for poor kids would see a total of $2.7 billion in cuts. The $400 million slashed from Head Start, the preschool program for poor children, would result in reduced services for some 70,000 kids.
Title I Funding: The Department of Education's Title I program, the biggest federal education program in the country, subsidizes schools that serve more than a million disadvantaged students. It would see $725 million in cuts.
Rural rental assistance: Cuts to the Department of Agriculture would result in the elimination of rental assistance for 10,000 very low-income rural people, most of whom are single women, elderly, or disabled.
Social Security: Although Social Security payments themselves won't be scaled back, cuts to the program would result in a massive backlogging of disability claims.
Unemployment benefits: More than 3.8 million people getting long-term unemployment benefits would see their monthly payments reduced by as much as 9.4 percent, and would lose an average of $400 in benefits over their period of joblessness.
Veterans services: The Transition Assistance Program would be forced to cut back some of the job search and career transition services it provides to 150,000 vets a year.
Nutritional Assistance for Women & Children: The government's main food stamp program is exempt from cuts, but other food programs would take a hit. Some 600,000 women and children would be cut from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, which provides nutrition assistance and education.
Special education: $978 million* in cuts would affect 30.7 million children. For example, the scaling back of federal grants to states for students with disabilities would mean that cash-strapped states and districts would have to come up with the salaries for thousands of teachers, aides, and staff that serve special needs kids.
Job training programs: $37 million would be slashed from a job retraining and placement program called Employment Services, and $83 million would be cut from Job Corps, which provides low-income kids with jobs and education.

*Correction: This originally read "$978 billion"; "million" is correct.
Get Mother Jones by Email - Free. Like what you're reading? Get the best of MoJo three times a week.

Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?

Sharing this page …
Thanks! Close

Showing 79 of 225 comments

Sort by Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS
Show more comments …

Add New Comment

Home > Pressroom > VFP News Blog > Veterans For Peace Applauds Bradley Manning!
March 01, 2013
bradleymanning.jpg"I felt I accomplished something that would allow me to have a clear conscience.”
Bradley Manning has shown us once again that he is a hero. On Thursday, February 28, he made a profound and historic statement to a military court and to the world. Reading from prepared notes for over an hour, Bradley detailed how he released classified military and government documents to Wikileaks, and he explained why he did so.
I believed if the public, particularly the American public, could see this it could spark a debate on the military and our foreign policy in general as it applied to Iraq and Afghanistan. It might cause society to reconsider the need to engage in counter terrorism while ignoring the human situation of the people we engaged with every day.... I felt I accomplished something that would allow me to have a clear conscience.”
What Manning released through Wikileaks was evidence of the regular killing of civilians by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the regular cover-up of these war crimes. The Iraq War Logs and the Afghan War Diaries also revealed that military and civilian leaders were lying to the U.S. people when they presented rosy assessments of the progress of those wars.
Would that we all had listened to these truths when Bradley revealed them almost three years ago. Perhaps we would not still have US Special Forces engaged in murder, mayhem and torture in Afghanistan today
Contrary to the misinformation being transmitted in many mainstream news reports, Bradley Manning did not make a plea agreement, and he certainly did not agree to go to prison for twenty years. Rather, he unilaterally pled guilty to 10 of the lesser charges against him, while maintaining his innocence to 12 more serious charges, especially Aiding the Enemy, which can be punished by life in prison and even the death penalty (Army prosecutors say they will not seek the death penalty – very gracious of them).
Rather than “rolling over” or “caving in,” Bradley has courageously chosen a path which allows him to tell the world the truth and to explain the meaning of what he has done.
Bradley Manning is a champion for peace and justice, for truth and transparency. He had the courage to follow his conscience and to do the right thing, regardless of the consequences. He showed us that courage again in the courtroom this week. The US government and military have already punished Bradley severely and apparently they will try to keep him behind bars for the rest of his life. Veterans For Peace will not allow this to happen.
We demand that the US Army drop all charges against Bradley Manning and release him from prison immediately. We intend to stand with Bradley every step of the way. We will escalate our support actions leading up to his court martial, which is expected to begin on June 3 and to proceed throughout the summer. We will show up en masse at Fort Meade, Maryland for the support rally being planned for Saturday, June 1. We will protest in our hometowns too, including at military recruiting stations. Bradley Manning represents everything that Veterans For Peace stands for and we will not stop until he is free.
Submitted by VFP Board member, Gerry Condon
#####
Home > Pressroom > VFP News Blog > Veterans For Peace Applauds Bradley Manning!
March 01, 2013
bradleymanning.jpg"I felt I accomplished something that would allow me to have a clear conscience.”
Bradley Manning has shown us once again that he is a hero. On Thursday, February 28, he made a profound and historic statement to a military court and to the world. Reading from prepared notes for over an hour, Bradley detailed how he released classified military and government documents to Wikileaks, and he explained why he did so.
I believed if the public, particularly the American public, could see this it could spark a debate on the military and our foreign policy in general as it applied to Iraq and Afghanistan. It might cause society to reconsider the need to engage in counter terrorism while ignoring the human situation of the people we engaged with every day.... I felt I accomplished something that would allow me to have a clear conscience.”
What Manning released through Wikileaks was evidence of the regular killing of civilians by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the regular cover-up of these war crimes. The Iraq War Logs and the Afghan War Diaries also revealed that military and civilian leaders were lying to the U.S. people when they presented rosy assessments of the progress of those wars.
Would that we all had listened to these truths when Bradley revealed them almost three years ago. Perhaps we would not still have US Special Forces engaged in murder, mayhem and torture in Afghanistan today
Contrary to the misinformation being transmitted in many mainstream news reports, Bradley Manning did not make a plea agreement, and he certainly did not agree to go to prison for twenty years. Rather, he unilaterally pled guilty to 10 of the lesser charges against him, while maintaining his innocence to 12 more serious charges, especially Aiding the Enemy, which can be punished by life in prison and even the death penalty (Army prosecutors say they will not seek the death penalty – very gracious of them).
Rather than “rolling over” or “caving in,” Bradley has courageously chosen a path which allows him to tell the world the truth and to explain the meaning of what he has done.
Bradley Manning is a champion for peace and justice, for truth and transparency. He had the courage to follow his conscience and to do the right thing, regardless of the consequences. He showed us that courage again in the courtroom this week. The US government and military have already punished Bradley severely and apparently they will try to keep him behind bars for the rest of his life. Veterans For Peace will not allow this to happen.
We demand that the US Army drop all charges against Bradley Manning and release him from prison immediately. We intend to stand with Bradley every step of the way. We will escalate our support actions leading up to his court martial, which is expected to begin on June 3 and to proceed throughout the summer. We will show up en masse at Fort Meade, Maryland for the support rally being planned for Saturday, June 1. We will protest in our hometowns too, including at military recruiting stations. Bradley Manning represents everything that Veterans For Peace stands for and we will not stop until he is free.
Submitted by VFP Board member, Gerry Condon
#####
Two candidates for a state Senate seat representing South Boston called Friday for the inclu­sion of gay and lesbian groups in the neighborhood’s annual St. Patrick’s Day parade, but the parade’s organizer said there are no plans to change its policies barring those groups.
Maureen Dahill, a Democrat and fourth-generation South Boston resident, and state Representative Linda Dorcena ­Forry, a Dorchester Democrat, released statements Friday saying the time has come to welcome lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender groups into the ­parade organized by the Allied War Veterans Council.
“I know this [controversy] has been going on since the mid-’90s, and I just feel like now is the time,” Dahill, 43, said by phone Friday. “South Boston is a wonderful and inclu­sive neighborhood, and I feel like the parade should ­reflect that.”
Dorcena Forry, a Haitian-American who is married to Irish-American journalist Bill Forry, said this issue has kept her out of the parade for the eight years she has served on Beacon Hill, but she would like to be able to march with their four half-Irish children.
“I go to the breakfast every year; I just do not march in the parade,” Dorcena Forry, 39, said, referring to the annual ­political breakfast that for the past 11 years has been hosted by former state senator John A. Hart Jr.
‘It’s just that it’s not that type of a parade.’
Quote Icon
Dorcena Forry, Dahill, and state Representative Nick ­Collins are competing to fill the First Suffolk District Senate seat recently vacated when Hart took a job at a law firm.
Collins, a South Boston Democrat, could not be reached for comment Friday night.
“I have never walked because it has not been inclusive,” Dorcena Forry said. “I’ve ­always taken that stand. I’m hopeful and I have faith that the parade committee will really do the right thing.”
A spokeswoman for Mayor Thomas M. Menino said he, too, chooses not to participate in the parade because of the policy against gay groups. But she also pointed to a 1995 ruling by the US Supreme Court that said organizers have the right to choose who marches.
“It’s a private parade,” said Dot Joyce, Menino’s spokeswoman. “The mayor has made his statement very clear. He does not march in that parade, but the Supreme Court has ruled on that parade.”
Philip J. Wuschke Jr., organizer of the parade for the past three years, said lesbians and gay men are welcome to march as individuals and as members of other groups, but the event is a celebration and not a political demonstration.
“Gay and lesbian people have been walking in the ­parade since the beginning of the parade itself,” Wuschke, 47, said Friday. “They just don’t come out holding a sign.
“It isn’t that gay and lesbian people are banned; it’s just that it’s not that type of a parade,” he added.
Wuschke cited the Supreme Court ruling and said he has turned away other groups, includ­ing white supremacists, who hoped to use the parade as a vehicle for political agendas.
“There is a day — I think the parade is in July — that they go out and they have their march,” he said of Boston Pride, the ­annual celebration for gay groups. “I mean, why keep picking on this parade? I just don’t know.”
Dahill, who founded and ­edits the Caught in Southie website, said for her the issue is personal. She has many lesbian and gay supporters, she said, as well as a brother who is gay.
This year, she would like to march alongside her brother, she said, knowing that he and his community are welcome.
“Why not?” Dahill said. “It’s 2013. It’s a different time. It’s the perfect time, I feel like.”
Jeremy C. Fox can be reached at jeremy.fox@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @jeremycfox.

--

Cole Harrison

Executive Director

Massachusetts Peace Action

11 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138

617-354-2169 w

617-466-9274 m


Twitter: masspeaceaction
As the final touches are put on preparations for the March for Rights, Respect, and Fair Food (including the 8-ft. tall statue, right, that will accompany marchers every step of the way), social media chatter around the march surges!
Facebook, Twitter, and the blogosphere alive with messages from marchers, well wishers...
Cheryl Queen is an executive with Compass Group, the country's largest foodservice company and one of eleven multi-billion dollar food industry leaders that has signed on to the Fair Food Program.
But she is also a person of strong faith who believes deeply in the mission of the Presbyterian Hunger Program, and as such will be joining workers from Immokalee and hundreds of other Fair Food allies for part of the March for Rights, Respect, and Fair Food. And to share her excitement about the coming march, she sent this statement to the Presbyterian Hunger Program's Facebook page:
"I’m very proud to join this year’s March for Rights, Respect and Fair Food. Since 2007 Compass Group has enjoyed a partnership with the Coalition and the Fair Food Standards Council that reflects the highest levels of ethical behavior, transparency and authenticity. The Coalition embodies passion and integrity coupled with humility, and that’s what brings about lasting change in a way that honors and recognizes everyone. On a personal level it is always feels like a homecoming to return to Immokalee and visit friends and partners. Sharing this March together, particularly during the Lenten season, feels like a walk of faith, transformation and celebration..."
For more inspiring words from allies heading to the March, head over to the CIW website!
Why Southie parade organizers ban gays
BY SUE O'CONNELL | FEBRUARY 27, 2013
Why Southie parade organizers ban gays
1992 specataors react to GLIB marching in the parade. (Marilyn Humphries)
Boston is having a parade to celebrate St. Patricks Day on Sunday, March 17 and LGBT folks are not invited. In fact, we are prohibited from participating.

Gay and lesbian groups are barred from marching in the South Boston St. Patrick’s Day Parade by organizers, The Allied War Veterans. Last year, the organizers rejected an application by MassEquality to march in the parade.

In 1992, Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Group of Boston (GLIB) applied to march in the parade and were rejected. The Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) argued in front of the United States Supreme Court in groundbreaking case Hurley v. GLIB that all should be allowed to march.

GLIB was allowed to march in 1992 and 1993 due to an order from the court. In 1994 organizers canceled the parade rather than allow GLIB to participate.

In 1995 the case went to the US Supreme Court where parade organizers claimed their First Amendment rights were being infringed upon.

The U.S. Supreme Court in June 1995 reversed the Massachusetts courts.

The Allied War Veterans Council, organizers of the parade, continue to discriminate by not allowing LGBT groups to participate. Many elected officials, including Mayor Tom Menino, vow to boycott the parade until all can participate. Many elected officials choose to march.