-- | ||||
Monday, December 23, 2013
Such was
the case with the important 10-city tour we organized with the Afghan Women’s
Mission for the former Afghan legislator and human rights activist, Malalai
Joya. The tour, which coincided with the 12th anniversary of the
Afghan invasion, attracted large audiences throughout the country. Joya
explained that no one can liberate the Afghan people except for the Afghan
people themselves. She said the continued US occupation of her country was the
cause of much of the misery of Afghan women and Afghan people as a whole. We
raised tens of thousands of dollars to support her work in Afghanistan and her
ongoing mission to tell the truth about the US occupation.
drones. Three UNAC leaders also
traveled to Pakistan at the end of last year with the Code Pink anti-drone
delegation to that country. We were joined by thousands of Pakistanis as we
pushed our way to the border of Waziristan where the US drones are taking their
terrible toll and came back to speak to audiences throughout the country and
Canada. We also attended the anti-drone conference organized by Code Pink last
month to prepare ourselves for the continuing fight against drone warfare and
mass surveillance.
As the war in Syria continued to
heat up and mercenary forces, armed by the US and its allies continued to pour
into country and when the Obama administration declared that it would strike
Syria, we called for emergency demonstrations demanding “No U.S. War on Syria.”
These took place in close to 100 cities and were larger than we had seen for a
long time. Polls showed the people were overwhelmingly against any US attack.
The British Parliament voted against supporting a strike and the US congress
was poised to do the same. Obama was compelled to back down, at least for the
moment.
release from prison for UNAC’s
own coordinating committee member attorney Lynne Stewart. We spoke at and
organized forums and meetings in support of Chelsea Manning, against NSA spying
and growing attacks on civil liberties such as the recent attack on
Palestinian-American leader Rasmea Odeh and the FBI attacks on the 24 antiwar
and solidarity activists who had their homes raided and were served with federal
subpoenas. Many of these 24 are leaders and supporters of UNAC.
NATO is planning its next
summit in Britain and many groups including international groups that UNAC
collaborates with like the No to War, No to NATO coalition are planning actions
similar to the ones we initiated and helped organize, such as the rally of
15,000 activists, when the NATO summit was held in Chicago in May, 2012. We
will want to participate in these anti-NATO actions in Britain and perhaps build
solidarity actions in the US. 
***The Roots Is The Toots- The Music That Got Them Through The Great Depression And World War II…
…it wasn’t always about the struggle against some big societal hurts, against food hunger or that gnawing hunger, want hunger that eats away at a woman or man, it wasn’t always about what to do next to keep body and soul together, it wasn’t always about desperate heroic deeds ahead in places nobody had ever heard of , it wasn’t always about what to do, or not do, about fighting the night-takers of the world, it wasn’t always desperately waiting for news, waiting for the other shoe to drop about Johnny, Jimmy or Leroy. A lot of that was for those older coming of age youth but for the younger ones, the ones left to put nickels and dimes in Doc’s Drugstore jukebox (or name your jukebox location), it looked a lot like stuff that had been going on ever since some guy, some old guy from what everybody head, invented teenage-hood several decades before. And so it was with him, him and his hidden desire, virginal desire, maybe, maybe not, such things were kept on the QT then, for her, and the way she disturbed his dreams, disturbed his night.
It all started like all such things started no need to detail every little point like the story hadn’t been told before, hadn’t been told since Adams and Eve, maybe before. He spied her all black hair and freshness, she gave a furtive glance his way, maybe in class at school, maybe at Doc’s when some dreamy song came on the jukebox, or maybe in the back row of church, the possibilities were endless. They talked and they did their mating dance. They went out together, boy-girl together, made out, maybe more, but like I said such things were closely held in those days. Reputations mattered and everybody knew everybody else so if an “accident” occurred the old gone to Aunt Ethel gag came into play.
Whatever happened at night they had their favorite song, favorite spot (down at the far end of Squaw Rock, okay, meaning no question they doing it since nobody went there to get swoony over the ocean), favorite everything that there could be a favorite for. Then the hammer came down. See, that first furtive glance that got him going she gave him was to get Billy mad, Billy who had split them up running after some Jane and who was now contrite, was back in her field of vision, and so he, well, to put it in cold hard teen talk, was yesterday’s news. Yes, yesterday’s news and wandering, constantly wandering down at Squaw Rock, wondering.
Yes, wondering like some fool, like some kid fool and he almost ready to go, after summer’s end if he could survive this hurt, to his senior year in high school and then off to join brothers and fathers in that great big shooting gallery oversea (his preference, like his older brothers, to go west, go west to get those Japs, those beasts, after Pearl). But now kid hurt, kid hurt wondering how his old corner- boy, corner boy, junior high school version and so harmless standing older guys-like against Mom and Pops’ Variety Store until Mom and Pop chased them away, or they had to do homework, Billy, could cut him that way, could come back and take her away with the snap of his fingers when he knew for a blessed fact that Billy was just playing with her, playing with her fragile heart.
And as it turned out that was exactly what Billy was doing, or that was the way that she started to understand his actions, his sneaking out with other women, again. Actions that were trumped though by the happenings in Europe and Asia as Billy’s number was called and he went, went not like a lot of other guys with an air of resignation but kicking and screaming about how he was more useful on the home front. So much hot air according to his friends and neighbors at the local draft board. Trumped too by him, by his wandering and wondering as she once again was seen at Doc’s alone, playing that old jukebox, spending her nickels and dimes, constantly playing That’s When Your Heartache Begins. He spied her, she gave him the now familiar furtive glance and so they started that old mating dance again. Started until his number too was called and with an air of resignation he was off. She saw him off at the station when he was ready to go to the uncertain European front, saw him off with tears. The night before they had vowed that they would get married when he got back, got back in one piece, and she swore too that she would play their song, Til Then, on Doc’s old jukebox every day until he returned. How about that, my friends.
From The Marxist Archives -The Revolutionary History Journal-Stalinism and Spain
...as a left-wing militant who came to political life in the early 1960s what happened in Spain in the 1930s always intrigued and bothered me. Intrigued because as I found out later the conditions for social revolution, the readiness of the people to rise and fight to the death, the so-called subjective factor was apparent. Bothered because as I also found out later the leadership, preeminently the Stalinists through the Spanish Communist Party and the Communist International, was not interested in fighting to the death for a social revolution. In fact Spain represented the first major transition from Stalinist policy being anti-revolutionary to being, in general, counter-revolutionary and subordinate to the mercurial aims of Soviet foreign policy. That intrigue and that bother continue to this day.
Click below to link to the Revolutionary History Journal index.
Peter Paul Markin comment on this series:
This is an excellent documentary source for today’s leftist militants to “discover” the work of our forebears, particularly the bewildering myriad of tendencies which have historically flown under the flag of the great Russian revolutionary, Leon Trotsky and his Fourth International, whether one agrees with their programs or not. But also other laborite, semi-anarchist, ant-Stalinist and just plain garden-variety old school social democrat groupings and individual pro-socialist proponents.
Some, maybe most of the material presented here, cast as weak-kneed programs for struggle in many cases tend to be anti-Leninist as screened through the Stalinist monstrosities and/or support groups and individuals who have no intention of making a revolution. Or in the case of examining past revolutionary efforts either declare that no revolutionary possibilities existed (most notably Germany in 1923) or alibi, there is no other word for it, those who failed to make a revolution when it was possible.
The Spanish Civil War can serve as something of litmus test for this latter proposition, most infamously around attitudes toward the Party Of Marxist Unification's (POUM) role in not keeping step with revolutionary developments there, especially the Barcelona days in 1937 and by acting as political lawyers for every non-revolutionary impulse of those forebears. While we all honor the memory of the POUM militants, according to even Trotsky the most honest band of militants in Spain then, and decry the murder of their leader, Andreas Nin, by the bloody Stalinists they were rudderless in the storm of revolution. But those present political disagreements do not negate the value of researching the POUM’s (and others) work, work moreover done under the pressure of revolutionary times. Hopefully we will do better when our time comes.
Finally, I place some material in this space which may be of interest to the radical public that I do not necessarily agree with or support. Off hand, as I have mentioned before, I think it would be easier, infinitely easier, to fight for the socialist revolution straight up than some of the “remedies” provided by the commentators in these entries from the Revolutionary History journal in which they have post hoc attempted to rehabilitate some pretty hoary politics and politicians, most notably August Thalheimer and Paul Levy of the early post Liebknecht-Luxemburg German Communist Party. But part of that struggle for the socialist revolution is to sort out the “real” stuff from the fluff as we struggle for that more just world that animates our efforts. So read, learn, and try to figure out the
wheat from the chaff.
********
...as a left-wing militant who came to political life in the early 1960s what happened in Spain in the 1930s always intrigued and bothered me. Intrigued because as I found out later the conditions for social revolution, the readiness of the people to rise and fight to the death, the so-called subjective factor was apparent. Bothered because as I also found out later the leadership, preeminently the Stalinists through the Spanish Communist Party and the Communist International, was not interested in fighting to the death for a social revolution. In fact Spain represented the first major transition from Stalinist policy being anti-revolutionary to being, in general, counter-revolutionary and subordinate to the mercurial aims of Soviet foreign policy. That intrigue and that bother continue to this day.
http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/revhist/backissu.htm
Peter Paul Markin comment on this series:
This is an excellent documentary source for today’s leftist militants to “discover” the work of our forebears, particularly the bewildering myriad of tendencies which have historically flown under the flag of the great Russian revolutionary, Leon Trotsky and his Fourth International, whether one agrees with their programs or not. But also other laborite, semi-anarchist, ant-Stalinist and just plain garden-variety old school social democrat groupings and individual pro-socialist proponents.
Some, maybe most of the material presented here, cast as weak-kneed programs for struggle in many cases tend to be anti-Leninist as screened through the Stalinist monstrosities and/or support groups and individuals who have no intention of making a revolution. Or in the case of examining past revolutionary efforts either declare that no revolutionary possibilities existed (most notably Germany in 1923) or alibi, there is no other word for it, those who failed to make a revolution when it was possible.
The Spanish Civil War can serve as something of litmus test for this latter proposition, most infamously around attitudes toward the Party Of Marxist Unification's (POUM) role in not keeping step with revolutionary developments there, especially the Barcelona days in 1937 and by acting as political lawyers for every non-revolutionary impulse of those forebears. While we all honor the memory of the POUM militants, according to even Trotsky the most honest band of militants in Spain then, and decry the murder of their leader, Andreas Nin, by the bloody Stalinists they were rudderless in the storm of revolution. But those present political disagreements do not negate the value of researching the POUM’s (and others) work, work moreover done under the pressure of revolutionary times. Hopefully we will do better when our time comes.
Finally, I place some material in this space which may be of interest to the radical public that I do not necessarily agree with or support. Off hand, as I have mentioned before, I think it would be easier, infinitely easier, to fight for the socialist revolution straight up than some of the “remedies” provided by the commentators in these entries from the Revolutionary History journal in which they have post hoc attempted to rehabilitate some pretty hoary politics and politicians, most notably August Thalheimer and Paul Levy of the early post Liebknecht-Luxemburg German Communist Party. But part of that struggle for the socialist revolution is to sort out the “real” stuff from the fluff as we struggle for that more just world that animates our efforts. So read, learn, and try to figure out the
wheat from the chaff.
********
Stalinism and Spain
and
This deadly threat immediately threw the workers and peasants into action. They seized factories and land which they then controlled through their own committees. They set up armed militias. The government was confronted from below by a mass revolutionary upsurge. The choice was clear: either a rapid move towards proletarian dictatorship or a military takeover. The workers and peasants were starting to exert their control over society, the ruling class was intent on securing its rule by military terror.
This is where the Stalinists stepped in. They were quick to deny that this was a fight for state power. A functionary of the Communist International explained:
The first Moscow show trial was staged in the summer of 1936. Despite the commitment to ‘socialism in one country’, Stalinism is an international force. The thrust of the trials – that Stalin’s opponents in the Soviet Union were conspiring with the exiled Trotsky on behalf of the Fascist states, was largely for external consumption. Andrei Vishinsky, the prosecutor at all the trials, explored the international dimension at the first trial:
Early in 1937 came the second Moscow trial and in March Stalin gave a particularly lurid speech to the central committee of the Soviet Communist Party. He declared that Trotskyism had ‘long ceased to be a political trend in the working class’ and that Trotskyists had ‘become a gang of wreckers, diversionists, spies, assassins...working in the pay of foreign intelligence services’. Moreover, ‘the old methods, the methods of discussion’ were obsolete in the fight against them, and ‘new methods, uprooting and smashing methods’ were now the prescribed means. [5] Notice had been served upon all of Stalin’s left wing opponents (Stalinists were not fussy about whom they called Trotskyists). They could no longer expect even the kind of ‘debate’ to which they had been accustomed. Now it was the show trials, prisons and the GPU’s death squads.
The reckoning was soon to come to Spain. Tensions had been growing between militant workers and the authorities, sometimes leading to armed clashes, especially in the Catalonia region. The authorities, with the full support of the Stalinists, staged in May 1937 a provocation in Barcelona by seizing the telephone exchange which had been held until then by the Anarchists. The ensuing street fighting gave the government the pretext to clamp down on the left wing forces. Freshly back from Spain, George Orwell remarked upon the ‘thoroughness’ with which the government was ‘crushing its own revolutionaries’:
In March 1938, as the final and most grotesque of the Moscow trials was being staged, the Spanish Trotskyists were charged with sabotage, espionage and planning the assassination of Negrin and, among others, leading Stalinists Jose Diaz and Dolores ‘Pasionaria’ Ibarruri. Time was running out for the POUM as well. In July the Executive Committee of the Communist International demanded ‘the complete extermination of the Trotskyist POUM gang’. [7] In October its leaders were brought to trial. However, Nin had not ‘confessed’, the ‘evidence’ against the accused was embarrassingly crude and, unlike the defendants in the Moscow trials who were burnt out after a decade of expulsions, exiles, isolators and capitulations, the POUM leaders demonstrated their contempt for the proceedings (one of them continually referred to the Spanish judge as Mr Vishinsky), and the more serious charges against them were dropped.
As the government and its Stalinist minions came down harder upon the left, the situation worsened for the republic. A month after the Trotskyists were charged, Franco’s forces had reached Vinaroz on the east coast, cutting republican Spain in two. Two weeks after the POUM trial had ended, republican troops had withdrawn to beyond the River Ebro. Barcelona surrendered on 26 January 1939, nationalist troops entered a defeated Madrid on 28 March. Under Negrin, much of the gains of the 1936 revolutionary upsurge had been whittled away. Land was returned to its former owners, factory directors and managers took back their old posts, restrictions on the church were eased and the army was rebuilt along traditional lines. Just before the fall of Madrid Trotsky noted:
There was nothing accidental about the so-called ‘excesses’ of the 1930s either in the Soviet Union or in Spain. Even if it didn’t follow a predetermined plan, the repression was drawn along by a remorseless logic. By the 1930s the Soviet bureaucracy had developed into a despotic ruling caste as fearful as the western ruling classes of proletarian revolution. Ever since Stalin promulgated his dogma of ‘socialism in one country’, the parties of the Communist International had steadily become local agencies of Soviet diplomacy, not leading the fight for workers’ power but attempting to pressurise their ruling classes into establishing friendly relations with the Soviet Union. The Popular Front of the 1930s was principally aimed at forcing the British and French bourgeoisies into concluding a collective security agreement with the Soviet Union to counter the growing threat from Nazi Germany. Stalin did not want the victory of Franco in Spain as he considered this would strengthen the position of Germany against France. He wanted the victory of a democratic capitalist Spain that would hopefully be aligned with Britain and France.
The Moscow trials were central to the Popular Front strategy even if, as Johnstone admits, they ‘made more difficult a closer relationship with and influence on the Socialists’. [10] If the Soviet Union was to forge friendly alliances with imperialist states, it would need a new image. 1917 was still fresh in people’s memories. The destruction of the Bolshevik old guard in the trials was to demonstrate that the Soviet Union was no longer a revolutionary threat to imperialism. The Stalinists were also concerned that their moderation would alienate the more active workers and were therefore determined that criticisms of their politics would not be heard. [11] If their left wing critics could be branded as ‘Fascists’ then no debate would be necessary. Those who recognised that workers’ democratic rights could only be defended by the struggle for state power received the worst of the Stalinists’ vengeance. Those who took the road of Socialist revolution would be crushed without mercy.
This is sheer dishonesty. The ‘evidence’ presented at all the show trials was shot through with blatant falsifications, inconsistencies and absurdities that were pointed out at the time. Nor could any honest observer describe the Barcelona May events as a POUM ‘putsch’. The Stalinists made no attempt seriously to analyse the politics of their left wing opponents. There was no excuse for believing all the filthy business at that time and there is certainly no excuse for justifying that belief four or five decades later. To have accepted the Stalinist line in the 1930s necessitated the shutting off of all critical faculties and the willing suspension of disbelief. By attempting to reject the more unpalatable features of their activities in the 1930s whilst defending the system which spawned them, the Stalinists graphically demonstrate their inability to extricate themselves from the web of slander and deceit which they themselves have spun.
Flewers’ strong Stalinophobic tilt amnesties the other reformist and centrist working-class tendencies. While the Stalinists were undoubtedly the most energetic and effective propounders and henchmen of the Popular Front in Spain, they did not occupy a social position to the right of the right wing of the Socialist Party: Trotsky spoke repeatedly of a ‘Stalin-Negrin government’. Ernest Erber, an experienced Social Democrat and former Trotskyist who spent some months in Spain during the Civil War as a representative of the American Young Peoples Socialist League, shows more political sense than Flewers: he scoffs at the idea of a Stalinist ‘totalitarian’ takeover of the Republican forces in Spain (see How real is the threat of a Communist “takeover”?, New Politics, Winter 1988).
Flewers treats the POUM, in particular, with kid gloves. But at crucial junctures the POUM – and the left Anarchists and Largo Caballero’s Socialists – each in their own way participated in the Popular Front. We cannot amnesty them from the standpoint of the revolutionary working class. This is particularly important in relation to the POUM.
Leon Trotsky broke all connections with Andres Nin and Juan Andrade when they led the erstwhile section of the International Left Opposition into fusion with the right-wing communists of Joaquim Maurin’s Workers and Peasants Bloc, giving birth to the misnamed ‘Workers Party of Marxist Unification’. The POUM’s first significant political act was to join in a common electoral bloc with bourgeois parties – the Popular Front.
Between the POUM, a member of the London Bureau ‘international of squeezed lemons’, and Trotskyism, there can be no common denominator in a revolutionary situation. Self-proclaimed Trotskyists who attempt to politically reconcile themselves with the POUM only succeed in compromising themselves – like Victor Serge and George Vereecken (the latter ended his political career writing the slanderous GPU Infiltration in the Trotskyist Movement for the political bandit Gerry Healy).
and
Spartacist statement on the above article
From Revolutionary History magazine, Vol.1 No.2, Summer
1988. Used by permission.
As in all backward capitalist countries, class confrontation in
Spain had always been direct. A Liberal/Socialist coalition government elected
in 1931 had made no effort to challenge the power of the industrialists, big
landowners or the church. The state machine was left intact and when peasants
and workers reacted as reforms promised were not delivered, they were brutally
suppressed. Such concessions, however, did not satisfy the bourgeoisie and in
July l936 Manuel Azana’s liberal government, which was supported by socialists,
communists and some anarchists, was challenged by a military uprising supported
by the vast majority of the ruling class.
This deadly threat immediately threw the workers and peasants into action. They seized factories and land which they then controlled through their own committees. They set up armed militias. The government was confronted from below by a mass revolutionary upsurge. The choice was clear: either a rapid move towards proletarian dictatorship or a military takeover. The workers and peasants were starting to exert their control over society, the ruling class was intent on securing its rule by military terror.
This is where the Stalinists stepped in. They were quick to deny that this was a fight for state power. A functionary of the Communist International explained:
In Spain it is not the proletarian dictatorship that is on the agenda of history. The struggle is not between proletariat and bourgeoisie for the establishment of the rule of the working class, but between the proletariat, the peasantry, the democratic bourgeoisie and the intellectuals on the one side, and the monarcho-feudalist reactionaries, the counter-revolutionary Fascists, on the other; against the hated monarchy, against feudal serfdom, against the fresh Fascist enslavement, for the maintenance of the democratic republic. [1]
Any attempt to hold onto this non-existent middle ground would mean
the suppression of any force that was going beyond it. As Trotsky argued:
When the workers and peasants enter on the path of their revolution – when they seize factories and estates, drive out the old owners, conquer power in the provinces – then the bourgeois counter-revolution – democratic, Stalinist or Fascist alike – has no other means of checking this movement except through bloody coercion, supplemented by lies and deceit. [2]
Adapting to the most conservative elements in the labour movement
leadership and the scrag end of the bourgeois democracy, the Stalinists worked
overtime to derail the revolutionary forces.
The first Moscow show trial was staged in the summer of 1936. Despite the commitment to ‘socialism in one country’, Stalinism is an international force. The thrust of the trials – that Stalin’s opponents in the Soviet Union were conspiring with the exiled Trotsky on behalf of the Fascist states, was largely for external consumption. Andrei Vishinsky, the prosecutor at all the trials, explored the international dimension at the first trial:
By rendering these accomplices of Fascism harmless, the people of the Soviet Union and its officials have not only done a service to their own country, but also to all fighters against Fascist slavery, to all friends of peace. For the fight of the French workers in the People’s Front, the heroic fight of the Spanish workers against the perfidious generals, the fight of the anti-Fascists before the Fascist courts in Germany, and lastly the fight of the peoples of the Soviet Union and their courts against the emissaries and supporters of Fascism, are all fundamentally one and the same fight, which is only being fought out on different sections of the front. [3]
Stalin’s opponents abroad could now expect the same treatment as
his victims at home. Pravda brought this home in December 1936
with an unambiguous threat: ‘In Catalonia, the elimination of Trotskyists and
Anarcho-Syndicalists has already begun; it will be carried out with the same
energy as in the USSR’. [4]
Early in 1937 came the second Moscow trial and in March Stalin gave a particularly lurid speech to the central committee of the Soviet Communist Party. He declared that Trotskyism had ‘long ceased to be a political trend in the working class’ and that Trotskyists had ‘become a gang of wreckers, diversionists, spies, assassins...working in the pay of foreign intelligence services’. Moreover, ‘the old methods, the methods of discussion’ were obsolete in the fight against them, and ‘new methods, uprooting and smashing methods’ were now the prescribed means. [5] Notice had been served upon all of Stalin’s left wing opponents (Stalinists were not fussy about whom they called Trotskyists). They could no longer expect even the kind of ‘debate’ to which they had been accustomed. Now it was the show trials, prisons and the GPU’s death squads.
The reckoning was soon to come to Spain. Tensions had been growing between militant workers and the authorities, sometimes leading to armed clashes, especially in the Catalonia region. The authorities, with the full support of the Stalinists, staged in May 1937 a provocation in Barcelona by seizing the telephone exchange which had been held until then by the Anarchists. The ensuing street fighting gave the government the pretext to clamp down on the left wing forces. Freshly back from Spain, George Orwell remarked upon the ‘thoroughness’ with which the government was ‘crushing its own revolutionaries’:
When I left Barcelona in late June [l937] the jails were bulging; indeed, the regular jails had long since overflowed and the prisoners were being huddled into empty shops and any other temporary dump that could be found for them. But the point to notice is that the people who are in prison now are not the Fascists but revolutionaries; they are not there because their opinions are too much to the Right, but because they are too much to the Left. And the people responsible for putting them there are ... the Communists. [6]
The replacement of Francisco Largo Caballero by Juan Negrin as
premier as a result of the May events was rapidly followed by an intensification
of the repression against the left. Unlike his predecessor, Negrin willingly
concurred with the Stalinists on the necessity to crush the left. The GPU was
steadily extending its nefarious activities in Spain, not only acting in its own
right, but infiltrating the republican judicial apparatus, the police and
military forces, enjoying complete freedom of operation. On 16 June the
leadership of the POUM, the Workers Party of Marxist Unification, was arrested
and its most prominent figure, Andres Nin, was kidnapped, cruelly tortured and
murdered behind closed doors. Other left wing militants, Kurt Landau, Marc
Rhein, Hans Freund (Moulin), Erwin Wolf, to name but a few, disappeared in the
hands of the GPU.
In March 1938, as the final and most grotesque of the Moscow trials was being staged, the Spanish Trotskyists were charged with sabotage, espionage and planning the assassination of Negrin and, among others, leading Stalinists Jose Diaz and Dolores ‘Pasionaria’ Ibarruri. Time was running out for the POUM as well. In July the Executive Committee of the Communist International demanded ‘the complete extermination of the Trotskyist POUM gang’. [7] In October its leaders were brought to trial. However, Nin had not ‘confessed’, the ‘evidence’ against the accused was embarrassingly crude and, unlike the defendants in the Moscow trials who were burnt out after a decade of expulsions, exiles, isolators and capitulations, the POUM leaders demonstrated their contempt for the proceedings (one of them continually referred to the Spanish judge as Mr Vishinsky), and the more serious charges against them were dropped.
As the government and its Stalinist minions came down harder upon the left, the situation worsened for the republic. A month after the Trotskyists were charged, Franco’s forces had reached Vinaroz on the east coast, cutting republican Spain in two. Two weeks after the POUM trial had ended, republican troops had withdrawn to beyond the River Ebro. Barcelona surrendered on 26 January 1939, nationalist troops entered a defeated Madrid on 28 March. Under Negrin, much of the gains of the 1936 revolutionary upsurge had been whittled away. Land was returned to its former owners, factory directors and managers took back their old posts, restrictions on the church were eased and the army was rebuilt along traditional lines. Just before the fall of Madrid Trotsky noted:
The Spanish revolution was Socialist in its essence: the workers attempted several times to overthrow the bourgeoisie, to seize the factories; the peasants wanted to take the land. The “People’s Front”, led by the Stalinists strangled the Socialist revolution in the name of an outlived bourgeois democracy. Hence the disappointment, the hopelessness, the discouragement of the masses of workers and peasants, the demoralisation of the republican army, and as a result, the military collapse. [8]
With the revolutionary movement suppressed by the Stalinists on
behalf of the republican government, Franco’s victory was assured.
No Aberration
Since the mid-1950s the Stalinists have moderated their invective
against their left wing opponents and will admit that the Trotskyists and other
militants were not, after all, in the pay of the Gestapo. However, the worst
aspects of the 1930s, the ‘aggressive and uncritical extolling of Stalin and all
aspects of the Soviet Union, including the Moscow trials’, did manifest itself
‘within the framework of a basically correct and creative strategy’, as
Monty Johnstone, a leading British Stalinist, put it. [9] The slanders, show trials and assassinations are seen as an
aberration, not as an integral part of the Stalinist strategy of the time.
Today’s Stalinists want the omelette but not the broken eggs.
There was nothing accidental about the so-called ‘excesses’ of the 1930s either in the Soviet Union or in Spain. Even if it didn’t follow a predetermined plan, the repression was drawn along by a remorseless logic. By the 1930s the Soviet bureaucracy had developed into a despotic ruling caste as fearful as the western ruling classes of proletarian revolution. Ever since Stalin promulgated his dogma of ‘socialism in one country’, the parties of the Communist International had steadily become local agencies of Soviet diplomacy, not leading the fight for workers’ power but attempting to pressurise their ruling classes into establishing friendly relations with the Soviet Union. The Popular Front of the 1930s was principally aimed at forcing the British and French bourgeoisies into concluding a collective security agreement with the Soviet Union to counter the growing threat from Nazi Germany. Stalin did not want the victory of Franco in Spain as he considered this would strengthen the position of Germany against France. He wanted the victory of a democratic capitalist Spain that would hopefully be aligned with Britain and France.
The Moscow trials were central to the Popular Front strategy even if, as Johnstone admits, they ‘made more difficult a closer relationship with and influence on the Socialists’. [10] If the Soviet Union was to forge friendly alliances with imperialist states, it would need a new image. 1917 was still fresh in people’s memories. The destruction of the Bolshevik old guard in the trials was to demonstrate that the Soviet Union was no longer a revolutionary threat to imperialism. The Stalinists were also concerned that their moderation would alienate the more active workers and were therefore determined that criticisms of their politics would not be heard. [11] If their left wing critics could be branded as ‘Fascists’ then no debate would be necessary. Those who recognised that workers’ democratic rights could only be defended by the struggle for state power received the worst of the Stalinists’ vengeance. Those who took the road of Socialist revolution would be crushed without mercy.
Still Lying
Many of the tales spread by the Stalinists during the Spanish Civil
War are still retailed today, if in a more moderate, more apologetic manner.
They still insist that the response of the Barcelona workers to the Stalinist
provocation in May 1937 was a putsch staged by adventurists and provocateurs.
Despite the proven presence of the GPU in Spain, the Stalinists prefer their
fond memories. Leading Spanish Stalinist Santiago Carrillo recalls:
... it is true that it has been said that there were GPU prisons. I personally have no proof that there were and I never saw one, even though I believe the Soviet people must have had certain services [!!] in Spain, connected with the presence of their volunteers who were fighting at the front. [12]
A common response of late is to admit that the allegations made
against the POUM and the Trotskyists were slanderous and the persecutions
unjustified, but that it is perfectly understandable why the Communist movement
accepted it all at the time. To quote Carrillo on the disappearance of Nin:
In the eyes of public opinion in general the Barcelona putsch was a counter-revolutionary act; there was a revolutionary war in Spain and, for the whole of the army and the people, that putsch, which a small group of Anarchists and Trotskyists had got together to carry out, appeared to be a counter-revolutionary act aimed at opening the front and helping the Fascist offensive ... The putsch of May 1937 strengthened us in the opinion that the Trotskyists were counter-revolutionaries. [13]
The recent official history of the Communist Party of Great Britain
considers that ‘it was hardly surprising that the POUM should be regarded as
traitors’ and ‘the notion that Trotskyists could be allied with fascists, or
used as tools of the latter seemed plausible after the experience of the POUM in
Spain’. [14]
This is sheer dishonesty. The ‘evidence’ presented at all the show trials was shot through with blatant falsifications, inconsistencies and absurdities that were pointed out at the time. Nor could any honest observer describe the Barcelona May events as a POUM ‘putsch’. The Stalinists made no attempt seriously to analyse the politics of their left wing opponents. There was no excuse for believing all the filthy business at that time and there is certainly no excuse for justifying that belief four or five decades later. To have accepted the Stalinist line in the 1930s necessitated the shutting off of all critical faculties and the willing suspension of disbelief. By attempting to reject the more unpalatable features of their activities in the 1930s whilst defending the system which spawned them, the Stalinists graphically demonstrate their inability to extricate themselves from the web of slander and deceit which they themselves have spun.
Paul Flewers
May 1988
May 1988
Notes
1. International Press
Correspondence, 8 August 1936.
2. L. Trotsky, The lessons of
Spain: the last warning, The Spanish Revolution 1931-39,
New York 1973, p.313.
3. International Press
Correspondence, 29 August 1936.
4. Cited in P. Broué and E.
Témime, The Revolution and Civil War in Spain, London 1972,
p.235.
5. J. Stalin, Defects in party
work and measures for liquidating Trotskyite and other double-dealers,
Works Vol.14, London 1978, p.261.
6. G. Orwell, Spilling the
Spanish beans, Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters,
Vol.1, Harmondsworth 1984, p.302. Orwell was no Marxist but he could tell a
revolution (and a counter-revolution) when he saw one:
The real struggle is between revolution and counter-revolution; between the workers who are vainly trying to hold on to a little of what they won in 1936, and the Liberal-Communist bloc who are so successfully taking it away from them. It is unfortunate that so few people in England have yet caught up with the fact that Communism is now a counter-revolutionary force; that Communists everywhere are in alliance with bourgeois reformism and using the whole of their powerful machinery to crush or discredit any party that shows signs of revolutionary tendencies. (Ibid.)
7. World News and
Views, 23 July 1938.
8. L. Trotsky, Only revolution
can end war, Writings of Leon Trotsky 1938-39, New York
1974, pp.234.
9. Marxism Today,
November 1975, my emphasis.
10. Ibid. And
the bourgeois parties the Stalinists were assiduously courting, as Johnstone
omits to say.
11. Trotsky was well aware of
how Stalin used the anti-Trotskyist campaign to influence both rulers and
workers in the west:
The Comintern exists and, despite the turn toward opportunism and chauvinism, in the eyes of bourgeois public opinion it bears responsibility for the whole revolutionary movement ... Stalin tried with all his might ... to prove that the Comintern was no longer a revolutionary instrument. But his word was not always so easily believed. To strengthen his credit with the French bourgeoisie he thought it useful to take bloody measures against the Left Opposition. But neither will he be able to renounce the Comintern. So-called “Trotskyism”, i.e., the development and the continuity of Marx and Lenin’s ideas, is spreading more and more, even in the ranks of the Comintern ... That is why it is a matter of life and death for Stalin, for his political authority before the workers, to destroy “Trotskyism”. With words? That is not his way. He has the apparatus, which makes it possible for him to stage frame-up trials. In this way the accusations must strengthen Stalin’s authority simultaneously among the allied bourgeoisie and among the revolutionary workers. (L. Trotsky, Stalin is not everything, Writings of Leon Trotsky 1935-36, New York 1977, pp.410-411)
12. S. Carrillo,
Dialogue on Spain, London, 1976, p.52. Two British Stalinists
say:
Stories about “NKVD agents” in Spain, especially in relation to the fight against Trotskyism, have been propagated so widely that one meets them almost everywhere, and this includes works by progressive historians. The authors of this article are inclined to think that most of them are apocryphal. (N. Green and A. Elliott, Our History, no.67, n.d. [late 1970s], p.22)
13. S. Carrillo, op.
cit., pp.52-53.
14. N. Branson, History
of the Communist Party of Great Britain 1927-1941, London 1985. pp.235,
248. Ms Branson does not inform her readers of Nin’s terrible fate. He was,
apparently, ‘almost certainly executed’ (ibid., p.244), by whom
she declines to say.
Spartacist statement on the above article
The above article by Paul Flewers is devoted almost exclusively to
a denunciation of the treacherous activities of the Stalinists in Spain, and
therefore down-plays the crucial question of the Popular Front. It must be
re-asserted that Trotskyists are not simply opposed to, but rather
counterposed to, the Popular Front and every class-collaborationist
alliance which subordinates the interests of the proletariat to those of the
bourgeoisie.
Flewers’ strong Stalinophobic tilt amnesties the other reformist and centrist working-class tendencies. While the Stalinists were undoubtedly the most energetic and effective propounders and henchmen of the Popular Front in Spain, they did not occupy a social position to the right of the right wing of the Socialist Party: Trotsky spoke repeatedly of a ‘Stalin-Negrin government’. Ernest Erber, an experienced Social Democrat and former Trotskyist who spent some months in Spain during the Civil War as a representative of the American Young Peoples Socialist League, shows more political sense than Flewers: he scoffs at the idea of a Stalinist ‘totalitarian’ takeover of the Republican forces in Spain (see How real is the threat of a Communist “takeover”?, New Politics, Winter 1988).
Flewers treats the POUM, in particular, with kid gloves. But at crucial junctures the POUM – and the left Anarchists and Largo Caballero’s Socialists – each in their own way participated in the Popular Front. We cannot amnesty them from the standpoint of the revolutionary working class. This is particularly important in relation to the POUM.
Leon Trotsky broke all connections with Andres Nin and Juan Andrade when they led the erstwhile section of the International Left Opposition into fusion with the right-wing communists of Joaquim Maurin’s Workers and Peasants Bloc, giving birth to the misnamed ‘Workers Party of Marxist Unification’. The POUM’s first significant political act was to join in a common electoral bloc with bourgeois parties – the Popular Front.
Between the POUM, a member of the London Bureau ‘international of squeezed lemons’, and Trotskyism, there can be no common denominator in a revolutionary situation. Self-proclaimed Trotskyists who attempt to politically reconcile themselves with the POUM only succeed in compromising themselves – like Victor Serge and George Vereecken (the latter ended his political career writing the slanderous GPU Infiltration in the Trotskyist Movement for the political bandit Gerry Healy).
Referring to the ‘Treachery of the POUM’, in his last major work
on the Spanish Revolution, The Class, The Party and the Leadership,
Trotsky pointed out:
To the left of all the other parties in Spain stood the POUM ... But it was precisely this party that played a fatal role in the development of the Spanish revolution ... It participated in the “Popular” election bloc; entered the government that liquidated workers’ committees; engaged in a struggle to reconstitute this governmental coalition; capitulated time and again to the anarchist leadership; conducted, in connection with this, a false trade union policy; and took a vacillating and non-revolutionary attitude toward the May 1937 uprising ... [A] centrist party invariably acts as a brake upon the revolution, must each time smash its own head, and may bring about the collapse of the revolution.
International Spartacist Tendency
***The Life And Times Of Michael Philip Marlin – Out In The Slumming Mean Streets
As readers know Tyrone Fallon, the son of the late famous Southern California private operative, Michael Philip Marlin (Tyrone used his mother’s maiden name for obvious reasons), and private eye in his own right told my old friend Peter Paul Markin’s friend Joshua Lawrence Breslin some stories that his illustrious father told him. Here’s one such story.
From The Pen Of Frank Jackman-with kudos to Raymond Chandler
Yeah, you know all the names of the streets, Hollywood and Vine, Sunset Boulevard, Mullholland Drive, and twenty others, streets where the American dream, celluloid version was to come true for sweet sixteens from Omaha, Cincinnati, and, hell, Greenwood down in Mississippi too. Guys, hulks too from Toledo, Scranton and Biloxi. Every color, every sex, every religion, including those without, getting hopes high after landing at the bus station that if they sat at just the right drugstore soda fountain they would be “discovered.” Problem, was, is, that the dream was fit to size for only a small number of those hordes who bussed in from Lansing, Yonker, and Portland (east or west take your pick). And that is where the knight in shining armor, the old wind-mill chaser, the old Los Angeles fixture private eye, Michael Philip Marlin, came in, came in to try and save one such weary traveler cold before the lights went out.
Just in case you don’t know, private cops, more so than the public ones, depend on information from lots of places, have favors done for them from lots of people, with or without information. That is what caused our Marlin to be out in the mean streets of Hollywood one night in 1940. Seems that a guy, a guy, Mike Davis, who ran the Dee-Drop Inn Diner over on Noon Street in the fair city of angels had done Marlin a few good turns and so he asked Marlin to look into a cold case, a case of a young women, Milly Jones, from back home down in the Delta who, stardust in her eyes, wound up face down in a forsaken ravine with about seven slashes across her body. Not a pretty sight. (A cold case for the public police is one where they are clueless to solve and dump it before it even has time to get looked at, most cases as it turned out.)
So Marlin asked around and got nowhere, got nowhere from the cops, from anybody who knew the girl, Nada. Nada, until he accidently witnessed a drug drop just off of Noon Street where a young women, Terry Blake, appeared to have been set up by somebody because when she went to pick up the package half of the Hollywood Precinct came out of the woodwork. On a hunch Marlin swooped her up before she took the package. A good hunch too because she was just a pigeon in the play. Naturally when dope is involved, and not just dope, the fingers of Tripper Lamb had to be all over the deal. Tripper used his Club Capri over on Sunset Boulevard as a front for all his illegal operations; drugs, women, booze, numbers, and a special service for whatever Hollywood big-shot wanted, anything.
And that anything is how Terry almost got set-up for a five to ten count. Terry fresh off the buses from down in Greenwood, Mississippi needed a job and a place. Now she was good- looking and so one of Tripper’s gang who kept an eye out for such talent swooped in on her with talk of meeting Hollywood stars, parties, maybe even a part in a movie. Terry said, well, that was what she was here for and so started her career as a “hostess” in Tripper’s club. And to show her appreciation Tripper asked her, pretty please asked her to do this little, little favor of picking up that bag of dope. The set-up part though was Tripper feeling some heat from the cops who were feeling the heat from the tax-paying citizens of Los Angeles using Terry to pay off old debts to the cops by giving them an easy collar and plenty of ink about busting that damn dope ring stuff that had half the town nervous about the next shoot-out.
Terry, once Marlin found out what the hell had come down, was mad as hell. And Marlin sensing a roll in the hay if he helped out gathered in Terry’s anger. Gathered it too because no way, no way in hell was Tripper Lamb going to let some hick from wherever she was from bust up his operations and had one of his gunsels, Big Nig, assigned to shut her up, shut her up permanently, and he almost did except Marlin coming up the street and noticing a car that did not belong on the edges of Noon Street got the drop on the big guy (and he really was big, black, about six -five and two- fifty).
After that it was strictly war between one Michael Philip Marlin and one Tripper Lamb. Naturally Tripper came up short. Marlin didn’t get that couple of rolls in the hay with Terry before he put her back on the bus to Greenwood but that was the breaks. Put her on that bus though to get her far away from the means streets where she could not survive.
***The
Life And Times Of Michael Philip Marlin –
Out
In The Slumming Mean Streets
As readers know Tyrone Fallon, the
son of the late famous Southern California private operative, Michael Philip
Marlin (Tyrone used his mother’s maiden name for obvious reasons), and private
eye in his own right told my old friend Peter Paul Markin’s friend Joshua
Lawrence Breslin some stories that his illustrious father told him. Here’s one
such story.
From
The Pen Of Frank Jackman-with kudos to Raymond Chandler
Yeah,
you know all the names of the streets, Hollywood and Vine, Sunset Boulevard,
Mullholland Drive, and twenty others, streets where the American dream,
celluloid version was to come true for sweet sixteens from Omaha, Cincinnati,
and, hell, Greenwood down in Mississippi too. Guys, hulks too from Toledo,
Scranton and Biloxi. Every color, every sex, every religion, including those
without, getting hopes high after
landing at the bus station that if they sat at just the right drugstore soda
fountain they would be “discovered.” Problem, was, is, that the dream was fit
to size for only a small number of those hordes who bussed in from Lansing,
Yonker, and Portland (east or west take your pick). And that is where the
knight in shining armor, the old wind-mill chaser, the old Los Angeles fixture
private eye, Michael Philip Marlin, came in, came in to try and save one such
weary traveler cold before the lights went out.
Just
in case you don’t know, private cops, more so than the public ones, depend on
information from lots of places, have favors done for them from lots of people,
with or without information. That is what caused our Marlin to be out in the
mean streets of Hollywood one night in 1940. Seems that a guy, a guy, Mike
Davis, who ran the Dee-Drop Inn Diner over on Noon Street in the fair city of
angels had done Marlin a few good turns and so he asked Marlin to look into a
cold case, a case of a young women, Milly Jones, from back home down in the
Delta who, stardust in her eyes, wound up face down in a forsaken ravine with
about seven slashes across her body. Not a pretty sight. (A cold case for the public police is one
where they are clueless to solve and dump it before it even has time to get
looked at, most cases as it turned out.)
So
Marlin asked around and got nowhere, got nowhere from the cops, from anybody
who knew the girl, Nada. Nada, until he accidently witnessed a drug drop just
off of Noon Street where a young women, Terry Blake, appeared to have been set
up by somebody because when she went to pick up the package half of the
Hollywood Precinct came out of the woodwork. On a hunch Marlin swooped her up
before she took the package. A good hunch too because she was just a pigeon in
the play. Naturally when dope is involved, and not just dope, the fingers of
Tripper Lamb had to be all over the deal. Tripper used his Club Capri over on
Sunset Boulevard as a front for all his illegal operations; drugs, women,
booze, numbers, and a special service for whatever Hollywood big-shot wanted,
anything.
And
that anything is how Terry almost got set-up for a five to ten count. Terry
fresh off the buses from down in Greenwood, Mississippi needed a job and a
place. Now she was good- looking and so one of Tripper’s gang who kept an eye
out for such talent swooped in on her with talk of meeting Hollywood stars,
parties, maybe even a part in a movie. Terry said, well, that was what she was
here for and so started her career as a “hostess” in Tripper’s club. And to
show her appreciation Tripper asked her, pretty please asked her to do this
little, little favor of picking up that bag of dope. The set-up part though was
Tripper feeling some heat from the cops who were feeling the heat from the
tax-paying citizens of Los Angeles using Terry to pay off old debts to the cops
by giving them an easy collar and plenty of ink about busting that damn dope
ring stuff that had half the town nervous about the next shoot-out.
Terry,
once Marlin found out what the hell had come down, was mad as hell. And Marlin
sensing a roll in the hay if he helped out gathered in Terry’s anger. Gathered
it too because no way, no way in hell was Tripper Lamb going to let some hick
from wherever she was from bust up his operations and had one of his gunsels,
Big Nig, assigned to shut her up, shut her up permanently, and he almost did
except Marlin coming up the street and noticing a car that did not belong on
the edges of Noon Street got the drop on the big guy (and he really was big,
black, about six -five and two- fifty).
After
that it was strictly war between one Michael Philip Marlin and one Tripper
Lamb. Naturally Tripper came up short. Marlin didn’t get that couple of rolls
in the hay with Terry before he put her back on the bus to Greenwood but that
was the breaks. Put her on that bus though to get her far away from the means
streets where she could not survive.  | ||
Dear Al, Secretary of State John Kerry and President
Hassan Rouhani recently hammered out an interim agreement that granted Iran
relief from some of the economic sanctions imposed by the United States and
other countries. In return, Iran agreed to a short-term freeze of parts of its
nuclear program. Ask Senators Markey and Warren to support peace with Iran! The agreement, while fragile, may lead to a permanent deal to normalize relations with Iran, lift sanctions and prevent the development of any Iranian nuclear weapons – and so increase the security of the region and decrease the chance of war. But 27 Senators last week, led by Democrats Menendez and Schumer, introduced a bill, S.1881, to kill Iran negotiations and pledge U.S. support for Israeli strikes on Iran. This bill will invalidate the interim deal, take diplomacy off the table, and put us back on the brink of war. Those who favor peace all agree: we cannot afford to miss this chance. Although President Obama has promised to veto this bill, the war party needs just 40 more supporters to pass the new Iran sanctions bill with a veto-proof majority. Senator Elizabeth Warren has made statements indicating support for the agreement, but we need her to forthrightly declare her opposition to S.1881. Senator Ed Markey has been silent on Iran since the interim agreement was signed. We need him to support diplomacy and peace and oppose S.1881. Ask our Senators to speak out for diplomacy with Iran, not war and more sanctions.  Massachusetts Peace Action
will give this everything we've got. We'll organize delegations, rallies and
forums across the state to make sure our Senators hear that the people want
peace, not war, with Iran.Will you help ensure Massachusetts Peace Action has the resources we need to organize the people's voice? Please take a moment to support this effort with a tax-deductible donation of $100, $250, or whatever amount is right for you.
|
Report
on Chelsea Manning's birthday celebrations
|
17 December 2013:
Happy Birthday Chelsea Manning - Free her
now!
| ||||||||
| |
||||||||
| BERLIN | ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| LONDON | ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| DETROIT | ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| SAN FRANCISCO | ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| PHILADELPHIA | ||||||||
|
Write to Chelsea:
PVT Bradley E Manning 89289
1300 N Warehouse Rd Ft Leavenworth KS 66027-2304 USA |
SIGN PETITIONS
|
More information:
| ||||||
|
DEFEND WHISTLEBLOWERS
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
US: PO
Box 11795 Philadelphia, PA 19101 / 215 848 1120
UK: PO Box 287 London NW6 2QU / 020 7267 8698
US: PO Box 14512, SF, CA 94114, / 415-626
4114UK: PO Box
287 London NW6 2QU / 020 7482
2496
| ||||||||
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Happy 26th Birthday Chelsea Manning!
President Obama, Pardon Pvt. Manning
CITY, STATE & ZIP _____________________________________________________________
Note that this image is PVT Manning’s preferred photo.
President Obama, Pardon Pvt. Manning
Because the public deserves the truth and whistle-blowers deserve protection.
We are military veterans, journalists, educators, homemakers, lawyers, students, and citizens.
We ask you to consider the facts and free US Army Pvt. Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning.
As an Intelligence Analyst stationed in Iraq, Pvt. Manning had access to some of America’s dirtiest secrets—crimes such as torture, illegal surveillance, and corruption—often committed in our name.
Manning acted on conscience alone, with selfless courage and conviction, and gave these secrets to us, the public.
“I believed that if the general public had access to the information contained within the[Iraq and Afghan War Logs] this could spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our foreign policy,”
Manning explained to the military court. “I wanted the American public to know that not everyone in Iraq and Afghanistan were targets that needed to be neutralized, but rather people who were struggling to live in the pressure cooker environment of what we call asymmetric warfare.”
Journalists used these documents to uncover many startling truths. We learned:
• Donald Rumsfeld and General Petraeus helped support torture in Iraq.
• Deliberate civilian killings by U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan went unpunished.
• Thousands of civilian casualties were never acknowledged publicly.
• Most Guantanamo detainees were innocent.
For service on behalf of an informed democracy, Manning was sentenced by military judge Colonel Denise Lind to a devastating 35 years in prison.
Government secrecy has grown exponentially during the past decade, but more secrecy does not make us safer when it fosters unaccountability.
Pvt. Manning was convicted of Espionage Act charges for providing WikiLeaks with this information, but the prosecutors noted that they would have done the same had the information been given to The New York Times. Prosecutors did not show that enemies used this information against the US, or that the releases resulted in any casualties.
Pvt. Manning has already been punished, even in violation of military law.
She has been:
• Held in confinement since May 29, 2010.
• Subjected to illegal punishment amounting to torture for nearly nine months at Quantico Marine Base, Virginia, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 13—facts confirmed by both the United Nation’s lead investigator on torture and military judge Col. Lind.
• Denied a speedy trial in violation of UCMJ, Article 10, having been imprisoned for over three years before trial.
• Denied anything resembling a fair trial when prosecutors were allowed to change the charge sheet to match evidence presented, and enter new evidence, after closing arguments.
Pvt. Manning believed you, Mr. President, when you came into office promising the most transparent administration in history, and that you would protect whistle-blowers. We urge you to start upholding those promises, beginning with this American prisoner of conscience.
We urge you to grant Pvt. Manning’s petition for a Presidential Pardon.
FIRST& LAST NAME _____________________________________________________________
STREET ADDRESS _____________________________________________________________
CITY, STATE & ZIP _____________________________________________________________
EMAIL& PHONE _____________________________________________________________
Please return to: For more information: www.privatemanning.org
Private Manning Support Network, c/o Courage to Resist, 484 Lake Park Ave #41, Oakland CA 94610
Note that this image is PVT Manning’s preferred photo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)