Sunday, December 16, 2012

Fast Food Workers in NYC Rise Up — The beginning of a low-wage workers’ rebellion?
Printer-Friendly
E-Mail This
Dec 5, 2012
By Jesse Lessinger, New York City
On November 29, workers at dozens of fast food restaurants in New York City walked off the job, formed pickets outside and raised demands for higher wages, better hours, and union rights. It was a truly inspiring moment to see workers who suffer silently in the margins come forward to speak up for themselves.
It is a myth that fast food jobs are just for youth looking to make some extra cash. There are nearly 50,000 fast food workers in New York, and for many it's their only means of earning income for themselves and their families.
Fast food work is more than just flipping burgers. Workers in fast food kitchens have to deal with workplace hazards like hot grease that often burns them (most have the scars to prove it). They work for minimum wage at $7.25, and many depend on food stamps and other government assistance. With so little weekly take-home pay some are forced to live in shelters. In fact, McDonald’s is reported to have recruited workers at homeless shelters.
Workers strike
In Midtown Manhattan, where workers from Burger King, Wendy's, KFC, and other restaurants walked out, the super-exploitation of fast food workers stands side by side with all the glitz and glamour of New York City high-end commerce, shopping, and tourism.
But now these heroic workers are taking a stand, and we as socialists, give them our unconditional support. It’s part of a campaign called Fast Food Forward, backed by New York Communities for Change (NYCC), UnitedNY.org, the Black Institute, and SEIU. It is the biggest attempt ever to organize fast food workers.
One of their demands is for $15 per hour in pay. This is significant, as many low-wage battles have called for much more modest pay increases. By asking for $15 they're going beyond saying they want a little more. The message is: “we deserve a living wage.” In truth, $15 per hour in New York City is not enough to live on for some, especially those with families, but it’s an enormous step in that direction.
Fast food workers are not the only ones taking bold measures to fight for better conditions. On Black Friday there were actions at upwards of 1,000 Walmarts across the country, with workers demanding union rights, no retaliation for speaking up, better hours, and $13 per hour in pay. These actions were not just one-off events, but are part of an on-going campaign of Walmart workers.
Taking on corporate giants
Fast food companies are expected to bring in $200 billion in revenue this year. Walmart's revenues in 2011 totaled $477 billion with $15.7 billion of that being pure profit. The Walmart family alone now owns as much wealth as the entire bottom 40% of families in the U.S. This obscene wealth is not created by smart business people making smart business decisions, it comes off the backs of their highly exploited workers, who are rewarded for their hard work with poverty wages.
Here in New York there have also been a number of battles recently to organize low-wage workers, predominantly among immigrants. Six grocery stores have been organized in Brooklyn. There are now four recently unionized car washes as well. They are fighting for higher wages and back pay. Also recently, workers at a Hot & Crusty bakery staged an occupation and 55-day picket to win union recognition. These are examples of the new self-organizing of workers into action, backed by the support of the community. Their employers caved because of their bold action.
But fast food companies and Walmart are much bigger employers and enormously powerful corporations that have and will continue to fight tooth and nail to prevent a union from forming. The actions last week received media attention all across the country and even forced McDonald’s to issue a statement saying they were committed to dialogue to be an “even better employer”. Do they really expect us to believe that? But it will take more than just bad publicity.
The Fast Food Forward campaign is a step in the right direction. Rather than organizing a single restaurant or chain, the campaign is aiming to organize the entire industry in New York City at once. A strategy is needed for highly coordinated actions on a truly massive scale if we're going to bring these corporations to heel. We'll need strikes and walkouts at hundreds of fast food stores with visible pickets outside everywhere backed up by thousands of Occupy and trade union activists and other supporters. This will require preparation and the workers themselves taking ownership of their struggle by forming their own workplace committees and linking them together to develop a strategy and coordinate action.
The struggle at these massive companies should be linked to a broader struggle to mobilize millions for the rights of all workers. Imagine if there were rolling walkouts at hundreds of restaurants, shops, groceries, and retail outlets all across the city demanding an across-the-board wage increase and union recognition for all!
NYC elections
We can also have no faith in Democrats, who like the Republicans are a party of the Wall Street and big business. In New York City, the mayoral hopeful and current Democratic city councilor, Christine Quinn, has made gestures of support for fast food workers, seeking to tap the support of workers for the 2013 election. But Quinn is deep in the back pocket of rich business owners. She even opposes legislation requiring employers to give all workers sick pay, so how can she be trusted to support a living wage?
Workers need to rely on their numeric strength and social power as the economic foundation of society. This power should not be sacrificed to corporate politicians at the ballot box. A far better way to impact elections and take the struggle forward would be to run a slate of working-class independent candidates for city council seats and mayor in 2013 on a platform of living-wage jobs and union rights for all. Such a campaign could act as a collective voice for the struggle of low-wage workers in the election while striking a powerful blow against the corporate politicians that have stacked the deck against the 99%.
A sleeping giant
Despite the corporate character of the Democratic Party, the defeat of the right wing in the 2012 elections is likely to give workers confidence. None of the underlying problems that gave birth to the Occupy movement have been solved, and 2013 is likely to be a year of renewed and potentially explosive struggles in the U.S.
The huge mass of low-wage workers is like a sleeping giant, that when roused could strike a mighty blow at the 1% and radically transform U.S. society. These young, energetic class fighters would provide fresh blood to revitalize the labor movement as organizations of class struggle, not class collaboration. Having been through the experience of what capitalism in the 21st century means – i.e. low wage jobs and miserable working conditions – support for socialist ideas would surge.
It may be too early to say that we're on the cusp of a low-wage worker rebellion, but one thing is for certain: this type of resistance is the music of the future and right now low-wage workers’ struggles should be a rallying point for Occupy activists looking to fight for the 99%, for trade unionists who are seeking to reinvigorate the labor movement, and for everyone who is ready to fight for the interests of working people and youth.


Socialist Alternative, P.O. Box 45343, Seattle WA 98145
Phone: (206)526-7185
Comments? Suggestions for improving our web page? Please email info@SocialistAlternative.org
Egypt: Hundreds of thousands protest President Mursi’s power grab
Printer-Friendly
E-Mail This
Dec 7, 2012
By David Johnson, Socialist Party (CWI England and Wales)
Democratic, trade union and women’s rights under attack
Large number of demonstrators clashed with state forces outside the presidential palace in Cairo on 4 December over attempts by President Mursi to grab new powers. Marchers chanted that "the people want the downfall of the regime", and held placards bearing slogans of "no to the constitution". It was reported that during the clashes Morsi fled the palace from a side gate in a convoy.
This follows days of large protests. Hundreds of thousands of Egyptians showed their objection earlier to President Mursi’s power grab, packing into Cairo’s Tahrir Square on Tuesday 27 November. Textile workers at Egypt’s largest factory, Misr Spinning, were joined by other workers and families in a 5,000-strong protest march in Mahalla. The Muslim Brotherhood called off their demonstration planned for the same day.
But two days later a new draft constitution was rushed through the Constituent Assembly after a 15-hour sitting. Secular liberal members, women and Christians in the Assembly had walked out in protest at the draft earlier in November.

Protest in front of presidential palace
Last Friday, another huge anti-Mursi protest gathered in Tahrir Square, along with other big demonstrations in other cities. An estimated 5,000 continued to occupy Tahrir. But the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafists have also mobilized their supporters, holding a very large demonstration in another part of the city on Saturday 1 December.
Mursi has hastily called a referendum on 15 December to approve the new constitution. His rush may be a reaction to the massive opposition to his power grab, which he conceded would only last until a new constitution was in place.
Undemocratic draft constitution
The draft constitution contains many clauses that could be used to restrict opposition to the government in the future. It states that, “The individual person may not be insulted.” Mubarak used similar methods to gag opponents to his rule. Criminal prosecutions on charges of “insulting the president” have actually increased since Mursi took office.
It leaves open the possibility of journalists’ imprisonment in cases related to freedom of expression. Journalists at twelve newspapers and five privately-owned TV stations are taking 24-hour strike action in protest this week.
A chat show host on the state-owned TV has protested at the “Brotherhoodisation of the media” after her show was withdrawn. She speculated that this could have been because a retired State Security Investigation Services officer was a guest on the show and would have revealed the good relationship some Muslim Brotherhood members had with the security forces under Mubarak.
The draft allows civilians to be tried in military courts “for crimes that harm the armed forces.” As the draft also leaves intact the military’s economic interests, this could open up workers in military-owned companies to face military trial for strikes or occupations. Again, the Mubarak regime had a similar law.
Women’s rights are left vague and open to different interpretations. Already women and girls have been assaulted and had their hair forcibly cut for not wearing the veil in public. The police are given powers to “preserve public morality”, opening the prospect of restrictions on civil liberties, including rights to assembly, freedom of speech and expression, as seen in Iran or Saudi Arabia. The eight million Christians feel particularly threatened by such powers.

Protest against the Muslim Brotherhood
Trade union rights under attack
Prime Minister Hisham Qandeel has said the government was committed to enhancing “the business environment…making Egypt an ideal destination for foreign direct investments.”
On the same day that Mursi announced his temporary unchallengeable powers, Decree No.97 on trade unions was published. It aims to strangle the growing independent trade unions and strengthen the Muslim Brotherhood’s position in the trade union movement. Only one union would be allowed in each company, preventing new independent unions from challenging the state-controlled Egyptian Trade Union Federation (ETUF).
This goes hand in hand with an attempt by the Muslim Brotherhood to seize control of the ETUF. All members of the ETUF executive over 60 years old (most of them) will be replaced. The Minister of Manpower (a Muslim Brotherhood member) will appoint the new members. Before the January 25th 2011 revolution, 22 of 24 members of the ETUF executive were members of Mubarak’s National Democratic Party. The last elections were held in 2006 and new ones should have taken place in October-November 2011. They were postponed because of parliamentary elections taking place at that time. The Brotherhood aim to replace Mubarak’s appointees with their own people.
Class divisions among Islamist supporters
Support for Mursi in opinion polls has fallen from 78% to 57% in the past seven weeks. Many demonstrating against Mursi told reporters that they had voted for him five months ago. But the size of the pro-Mursi demonstrations shows that there is still a large layer prepared to turn out in his support. Polls indicate that he has more support in the countryside and among those who have not been to university.
While protesting alongside liberals against Mursi’s power grab and the undemocratic draft constitution, socialists need to make clear their separate identity. A socialist constitution would include genuine democratic rights for all, as well as the right to freedom from poverty, homelessness and illiteracy. Free education and healthcare, pensions for the elderly and disabled, a decent minimum wage – these are all fundamental rights that will not be conceded by capitalist politicians, whether from right wing Islamist or liberal secular parties. Workers need their own party. Appealing to workers, the poor and the youth with a socialist programme of revolutionary change can split away support from the right wing political Islamist parties.


Socialist Alternative, P.O. Box 45343, Seattle WA 98145
Phone: (206)526-7185
Comments? Suggestions for improving our web page? Please email info@SocialistAlternative.org
Boston Subway Collision : We Need A Fight-Back Against Transit Cuts
Printer-Friendly
E-Mail This
Dec 11, 2012
By Joshua H. Koritz and Ryan Mosgrove
On November 29 in Boston, two subway trains crashed into one another at the Boylston stop downtown, sending around 35 people to the hospital. Thankfully, none of these injuries were life-threatening, but the incident raises serious concerns about the state of the public transit system here in Boston.
This is the second accident on the Green Line in the past two months, with the last one, which injured three people, occurring in early October near Brigham Circle on the E Line. The increased frequency of accidents has occurred against the backdrop of the service cuts and fare increases last spring. The Boston transit service is not just the oldest in the country, but also the deepest in debt, saddled with over $5 billion in debt and a deficit of nearly $160 million dollars (see the 2009 study "Born Broke").
The Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA) has made it clear that paying this debt is their highest priority. Yearly budgets hold debt payments – over $300 million per year – as untouchable; instead, they propose cutting bus routes, hugely raising fares, cutting employee health care, and making mass layoffs.
Austerity measures - such as the T fare hikes - will continue, as any economic recovery will be diverted into the pockets of big business. Already the MBTA debt is owed to big banks and rich investors. Everywhere across the U.S. and internationally, public services are cut and unions attacked while the debts owed to multibillion dollar banks are off the table. 2013 promises to be a year of struggle and fighting back. The fight for public transportation to be affordable and well-funded is shaping up to be a major battle here in Boston.
In the spring of 2012, softened by a one-time payout from the state government, the MBTA instituted a 23% fare increase on riders across the board, a plan far less severe than its initial proposals. This came with the warning that this was a stopgap, and that they would be back for more next year. Richard A. Davey, the transportation secretary for the city, has already been discussing the need for fare hikes and service cuts if the city doesn’t find a “long-term solution” to the deficit. Last year the MBTA held public meetings on the budget cuts in communities across Boston. Roughly 6,000 people attended these meetings where the anger of the community against the attacks was on display. Unfortunately, these hearings amounted to a pressure valve for the community to let off steam and feel like the MBTA was listening to their concerns, when in fact it was all just a smokescreen.
The Transit Riders’ Union (TRU) advanced a strategy of directly petitioning state politicians, along with publicity stunts. While these actions may have had some impact, they did nothing to harness the anger and energy that the thousands of ordinary people had.
Once these cuts had taken effect, Socialist Alternative united with activists from Occupy Boston, Common Struggle, and the IWW to form a coalition to organize fare evasions as a tactic to resist the fare hikes. This tactic, even with small numbers, attracted the attention of many people, including media outlets.
The MBTA is already preparing to attack working people again through service cuts and fare hikes, but this time we can be ready. We cannot accept cuts and we cannot accept attacks on transit worker pay or benefits. The excellent work from the summer of 2012 building for fare strikes and evasions should be taken up again: We have to start laying the groundwork immediately and creating a coalition between riders and transit workers if we want to win!
Workers and activists in Boston should organize meetings across the city to prepare people for what is coming and how to act. When the MBTA holds their meetings this time, activists should be prepared to intervene in these meetings and, if possible, even shut them down and turn them into a discussion about how the T can be made sustainable without selling out the community.
Debt held by big corporations and the 1% should be canceled. The major employers in the Boston area could not exist without public transportation and should be taxed to improve and expand it. We reject any additional taxes on working people, such as a “gas tax” or any other regressive proposals.
We should organize meetings to coordinate fare strikes across the city, reaching out to the workers who operate the T to support fare strikes and to consider workplace actions themselves. In 2006, public transit workers in New York City showed the power that transit workers have when they go on strike.
The reality is that there is a “long-term solution” to fixing the MBTA. Debt should be repaid on the basis of real need. There are hundreds of wealthy businesses and institutions like Harvard that receive tens of millions of dollars in tax breaks or subsidies and give back very little to the community. These businesses need the T because they need the workers in order to make a profit, and those workers can’t get to work if the T doesn’t run. Also, Forward Funding legislation should be repealed, which would put funding for the T back into the state budget, and further funding should come from the top 1%, not working people.
Whatever we win from the bosses is only temporary unless we can provide an alternative to capitalism altogether. Until these cuts are seriously addressed, accidents like the one last Thursday will be a regular occurrence. No service cuts! No fare hikes! No cuts in transit worker benefits and no layoffs! Cancel the MBTA debt and make big business and the 1% pay!


Socialist Alternative, P.O. Box 45343, Seattle WA 98145
Phone: (206)526-7185
Comments? Suggestions for improving our web page? Please email info@SocialistAlternative.org
News Flash: National Nurses United Agree to Challenge the Two Parties of Wall Street!
Printer-Friendly
E-Mail This
Dec 15, 2012
By SocialistAlternative.org
National Nurses United, the nations largest staff RN union with 185,000 members, held its 2012 Convention in Las Vegas on December 11 to 13. Nurses direct from Michigan's battle lines reported on the mass protests against the newly rammed-through "right to work" (for less) legislation and attack on women's reproductive rights. A "Care Plan for Building a National RN Movement" was proposed to delegates. Massachusetts Nurses Association delegate and Socialist Alternative member Seamus Whelan introduced an amendment to the proposal for the NNU to challenge electorally the two parties of the 1% (Democrats and Republicans) in local, state and national election races. Seamus also proposed linking an electoral strategy to emerging social movements to pose an alternative for the 99% against austerity and attacks on our living standards. The Convention voted in favor of this important proposal.
The full text of the passed amendment reads:
The NNU will challenge the corporate domination of politics and society by changing the way we do politics.
The NNU will consider supporting/endorsing independent candidates to challenge the two parties of Wall Street and the 1%, Democratic and Republican, in local, state or national election races of our choosing as these parties seek to carry out major attacks on public services and programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
The NNU will attempt to link an electoral strategy to the political and social movements that will emerge as people fight back against the corporate agenda and thereby allow the ideas and goals of the Main Street Contract for America to reach a broader audience and pose to the 99% a real alternative to austerity and attacks on our living standards.

See the video of NNU nurses demonstrating with Las Vegas Culinary and building trade union workers outside a non-union casino

Catch a glimpse of Seamus Whelan at 20 sec mark and 1.23 sec.


Socialist Alternative, P.O. Box 45343, Seattle WA 98145
Phone: (206)526-7185
Comments? Suggestions for improving our web page? Please email info@SocialistAlternative.org
A Democracy For the Millionaires — 2012 election spending shatters records
Printer-Friendly
E-Mail This
Dec 16, 2012
By Patrick Ayers
This article, initially written in the final days of the election season, appeared in a shortened form in Justice newspaper. This is a longer version with tremendously useful statistics and analysis. It comes as no surprise to many people: spending on the 2012 election broke all records. But, the estimated $6 billion in spending does not simply break the record, it shatters it.
“The 2012 election will not only be the most expensive election in U.S. history,” reported the Center for Responsive Politics (CPR), “the cost will tower over the next most expensive election by more than $700 million.”
Spending by “super PACs” and outside groups accounts for the largest increase, estimated by CPR to be $970 million in 2012 or more than triple what outside groups spent in 2008. These latest CPR figures are revisions of previous lower estimates.
But, the final tally could be even larger. According to the Sunlight Foundationa,/a>, as many as 67 brand new Super PACs sprang up across the country just in the last month of the election with millions to spend. Weekly spending has surged from just over $26 million in early September, to more than $210 million in the last full week of the campaign.
Citizens United
The trends are very clear. The 1% is going bananas with money and elections. Spending on congressional elections alone increased tenfold between 2008 and 2012, from $46 million to $445 million.
Certainly, the Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court in January 2010 is one reason for this marked shift. This decision removed one-hundred years of restrictions on campaign spending. While restrictions remain on direct donations to candidates, corporations and the rich are free to unload as much as they want on their own independent election material.
Mouthpieces of the 1% argue everyone has this same so-called “right”. But, how many of the 49.1 million Americans living in poverty or the additional 97.3 million Americans with low incomes have $10,000, $100,000, or $1 million laying around for an election?
Super PACs
In July 2010 another Supreme Court decision gave birth to “super PACs,” essentially massive political funds that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money on their own material in elections. Since then, there has been a rapid growth in PACs driven by corporations and the rich.
According to Public Research Interest Group, more than 60% of “super PAC” funding has come from 91 people making donations of $1 million or more, while 97% has come from donations of $10,000 or more from less than 2,000 donors. Just 629 people donated nearly as much money to super PACs as 1.9 million people did to both the Obama and Romney campaigns combined with donations of $200 or less.
“Super PACs” have heavily favored Republicans over the Democrats. But, in recent months the Democrats have embraced “super PACs” and have been < a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/21/democratic-super-pacs-2012-election_n_1995174.html">playing catch-up.
The third largest PAC is now Priorities USA Action, a pro-Obama fund that has received huge donations of more than $1 million from Hollywood celebrities, corporate executives, and the billionaire hedge fund manager James Simmons – the largest donor to the notorious Republican “super PAC” American Crossroads (Of course, the big donors often like to hedge their bets and donate to both campaigns).
There has also been a rapid rise in what's being called “dark money” groups. These are massive campaign funds like “super PACs,” buy they fall under a separate legal category as “social welfare” organizations.
One important difference is they do not have to disclose their donors. This is a huge incentive for their millionaire and billionaire backers who prefer to do their dirty work out of the public eye (taxes, business deals, you name it!). The former Bush guru and Republican evil genius Karl Rove runs one of the largest “dark money” groups Crossroads GPS.
Of course, corporate money continued to find its way into politics through more traditional channels like bundling and the big money private fundraisers that were important features of both presidential campaigns. By March of the 2012 campaign, Obama had already broken the record for the number of fundraisers attended by a sitting President.
When all this gorging on the presidential election is added up, the campaigns are likely to spend more than $1 billion each.
Democracy for the millionaires
While Citizens United clearly contributed to this marked upturn in spending, it does not fully account for the rising cost of elections, which has rapidly risen over the past forty years.
Between 1974 and 2002, the average amount of money raised by candidates for the House rose from $61,084 to $756,993. In the same period, the average raised by candidates for Senate grew from $455,515 to $4,460,206. (Kim Moody, US Labor in Trouble and Transition, New York, Verso, p.152)
This points to deeper processes driving the recent developments in the 2012 election. Mark Smith of the University of Washington argues, "If you look over a 30-year period, the biggest thing that I think is driving [the increasing cost of elections] is just inequality. There's more money at the top, and so there's more money that can slosh around."
But, the massive growth in inequality itself is being driven by a historic crisis of capitalism. The system cannot deliver both for the 99% and the 1% – particularly since the 1970s – so millionaires have increasingly used their vast financial resources to ram through policies that favor their interests over ours.
Build a movement of the millions
Many progressives are calling for repealing Citizens United. This should be fought for, but it won't be nearly enough to turn the tide in our favor.
For example, both the Democrats and Republicans would still be parties controlled and dominated by millionaires. Writing in the NY Times Sunday Review, Nicholas Carnes pointed out, “If millionaires were a political party, that party would make up roughly 3 percent of American families, but it would have a super-majority in the Senate, a majority in the House, a majority on the Supreme Court and a man in the White House.
“Even if we somehow stem the tide of money in Washington” continued Carnes, “even if we guarantee equal participation on Election Day, millionaires will still get to set the tax rate for millionaires.” (10/15/2012)
Campaigning to reform elections or the two parties by “getting money out of politics” will not be enough to challenge this “millionaires democracy.” More effective would be breaking with the two corporate-controlled parties, building mass movements independent of them, running hundreds of independent candidates, and building a new party of the millions, not the millionaires.
Working people, people of color, women, and everyone in the 99% have never won meaningful change by outspending corporations or by electing millionaire politicians. But, when we organize in our millions and consciously fight for our interests, we are unstoppable.


Socialist Alternative, P.O. Box 45343, Seattle WA 98145
Phone: (206)526-7185
Comments? Suggestions for improving our web page? Please email info@SocialistAlternative.org