THE FIGHT TO SAVE THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION, Part 3
BOOK REVIEW
THE CHALLENGE OF THE LEFT OPPOSITION (1928-29), LEON
TROTSKY, Pathfinder Press, New York, 1981
If you are interested
in the history of the International Left or are a militant trying to understand
some of the past lessons of our history concerning the communist response to
various social and labor questions this book is for you. This book is part of a
continuing series of volumes in English of the writings of Leon Trotsky,
Russian Bolshevik leader, from the start in 1923 of the Left Opposition in the
Russian Communist Party that he led through his various exiles up until his
assassination by a Stalinist agent in 1940. These volumes were published by the
organization that James P. Cannon, early American Trotskyist leader founded,
the Socialist Workers Party, in the 1970’s and 1980’s. (Cannon’s writings in
support of Trotsky’s work are reviewed elsewhere in this space) Look in this
space under this byline for other related reviews of this series of documents
on and by this important world communist leader.
Since the volumes in the
series cover a long period of time and contain some material that , while of
interest, is either historically dated or more fully developed in Trotsky’s
other separately published major writings I am going to organize this series of
reviews in this way. By way of introduction I will give a brief summary of the
events of the time period of each volume. Then I will review what I believe is
the central document of each volume. The reader can then decide for him or
herself whether my choice was informative or not.
The period under review is the time after Trotsky and
the leading elements of the United Opposition were expelled from the Russian
Communist Party and the Communist International by the Stalinist/Bukharinist
bloc who controlled the party and the International. The Zinovievist section of
the Opposition capitulated almost immediately. However, the bulk of the
Opposition led by Trotsky remained in opposition. In 1928 after the political
defeat of the United Opposition Trotsky was sent into internal exile at Alma
Ata in the far reaches of Russia. Other leading elements of the Opposition were
sent elsewhere. Thus, adding to the political defeat was the attempt to
physically disburse and breakup the opposition by Stalin and his henchmen.
Nevertheless under very trying circumstances the Left Opposition retained some
organizational and literary existence. In 1929 even the idea of this disbursed
internal opposition became too much for Stalin and Trotsky was sent to external
exile in Turkey, never to return to the Soviet Union.
During this period Stalin was
also attempting, as a result of previous erroneous domestic and international
policies, to shake off his alliance with the Bukharinite Right Opposition and
take sole control of the Russian party and the International. His success in
doing that allowed him to pursue a ‘left’ course in relationship to the rich
peasants which culminated later in the forced collectivization of agriculture
and intensified industrialization under his concept of top down central
planning. The confusion over this change in policy led many in the Left
Opposition to capitulate and was the source of much debate and rancor as
demonstrated in several of the writings in this volume. This is also the period
of the ‘third period’ in Comintern policy which declared that the final
impending crisis of international capitalism was at hand and that revolutionary
upheavals were on the order of the day everywhere. This policy was to have
catastrophic effects, particularly in Germany, as the Communist isolated
themselves from the base of the Social Democratic workers at a time of the
rising tie of fascism. We all know the results and it was not pretty.
Unlike the previous two
volumes reviewed under this byline no individual piece of writing sticks out
here. However, Communists have always prided themselves on their
internationalism and so Who is Leading the Comintern Today? is the article that
seems to best demonstrate the problems of the Stalinist international policy
during this period. Previously the mistakes in revolutionary strategy had been
a result of mistaken evaluations of the political situation or the immaturity
of the various, mainly European, parties. However, particularly with the false
policies on the Anglo-Russian Trade Union Committee and toward the Chinese
Revolution a conscious anti-revolutionary policy set in. That change from international
revolution as the ultimate defense of the Soviet Union to turning foreign
Communist parties into border guards for the whims of Soviet foreign policy was
to continue until the liquidation of the Comintern in 1943.
Trotsky in this article, with
his usual insight and rapier pen, looks not only at the implications of these
policies but the change of personal which affected the way the policies would
be implemented. Stalin, apparently, put every broken leader, failed
revolutionary, careerist and Menshevik skater he could get his hands on to
staff the International. Revolutions can not be made by such elements but, as
Trotsky points out, they can surely be destroyed by them. He highlights the
case of Martynov, a long time right-wing Menshevik leader, who came over to the
Bolsheviks in 1923. He had stood opposed to everything the Bolsheviks in their
prime stood for. Now he was a leading light theoretician of the Chinese defeat.
Nothing more needs to be said. Needless to say we have paid dearly for the victory
of such Themidorians. Read on.