From The Boston
Bradley Manning Support Committee Archives (October 2011)
From #Un-Occupied Boston (#Un-Tomemonos Boston)-General
Assembly-An Embryo For An Alternate Government-What Happens When We Do Not
Learn The Lessons Of History- From The Pen Of Radical Journalist Joshua
Lawrence Breslin-On Generals Without An Army?
An Injury To One Is An Injury
To All!-Defend The Occupy Movement And All
Occupiers! Drop All Charges Against All Occupy Protesters Everywhere!
********Fight-Don’t Starve-We Created The Wealth, Let's Take It, It’s Ours! Labor And The Oppressed Must Rule!
********
Below I am posting, occasionally, comments on the Occupy movement as I see or hear things of interest, or that cause alarm bells to ring in my head. The first comment directly below from October 1, which represented my first impressions of Occupy Boston, is the lead for all further postings.
*******
Markin comment October 1, 2011:
There is a lot of naiveté
expressed about the nature of capitalism, capitalists, and the way to win in
the class struggle by various participants in the Occupy movement. Many also
have attempted to make a virtue out of that naiveté, particularly around the
issues of effective democratic organization (the General Assembly, its
unrepresentative nature and its undemocratic, and frankly, bizarre and arcane,
consensus process and relationships with the police who are not our friends, no
way, when the deal goes down). However, the
spirit of the movement, especially among the young and open-minded, is refreshing, its activists are acting out
of good subjective anti-capitalist motives and, most importantly, even those of
us who call ourselves "reds" (communists), including this writer,
started out from liberal premises as naive, if not more so, than those
encountered at various occupation sites. We can all learn something but in the
meantime, and under all foreseeable conditions, we must defend the
"occupation" and the occupiers. More later as the occupation
continues.
********** As part a comment made in this space, dated October 20, 2011, I noted the following:
“… The idea of the General
Assembly with each individual attendee acting as a “tribune of the people” is
interesting and important. And, of course, it represents, for today anyway, the
embryo of what the “new world” we need to create might look like at the
governmental level.”
A couple of the people that I
have talked to were not quite sure what to make of that idea. The idea I posed
that what is going on in <i>Occupy Boston</i> at the governmental
level could, should, would be a possible form of governing this society in the
“new world a-borning” with the rise of the <i>Occupy</i> movement.
Part of the problem is that there was some confusion on the part of the
listeners that one of the possible aims of this movement is to create an
alternative government, or at least provide a model for such a government. I
will argue here now, and in the future, that it should be one the goals. In
short, we need to take power away from the Democrats and Republicans and their
tired old congressional/executive/judicial doesn’t work checks and balances
form of governing and place it at the grassroots level and work upward from
there rather than, as now, have power devolve from the top. (And stop well
short of the bottom.)
I will leave aside the question (the problem really) of what it would take to create such a possibility. Of course a revolutionary solution would, of necessity, have be on the table since there is no way that the current powerful interests, Democratic, Republican or those having no named politics, is going to give up power without a fight. What I want to pose now is the use of the General Assembly as a deliberative executive, legislative, and judicial body all rolled into one. In that sense previous historical models come to mind; the short-lived but heroic Paris Commune of 1871 that Karl Marx tirelessly defended against the reactionaries of Europe as the prototype of a workers government; the early heroic days of the Russian October Revolution of 1917 when the workers councils (soviets in Russian parlance) acted as a true workers' government; and the period in the Spanish Revolution of 1936-39 where the Central Committee of the Anti-Fascist Militias acted, <em>de facto</em>, as a workers government. All the just mentioned examples had their problems and flaws, no question. However, merely mentioning the General Assembly concept in the same paragraph as these great historic examples should signal that thoughtful leftists and other militants need to investigate and study these examples.
**********
Recently (see October 22, 2011 comment above) I noted the following while arguing for the General Assembly concept as a form of alternate government using historic examples like the Paris Commune (1871), the early soviets in Russia (1905 and 1917), and the early days of the antifascist militias in the Spanish Civil War (1936-37):
“However, merely mentioning
the General Assembly concept in the same paragraph as these great historic
examples should signal that thoughtful leftists and other militants need to
investigate and study these examples.”
In order to facilitate the
investigation and study of those examples I have, occasionally, posted works in
this space that deal with these forbears from several leftist perspectives
(rightist perspectives were clear- crush all the above examples ruthlessly, and
with no mercy- so we need not look at them now). I started this Lessons of
History series with Karl Marx’s classic defense and critique of the Paris
Commune, <i>The Civil War In France</i>. Other such examples have,
and will be, posted as the occasion arises
********Peter Paul Markin comment:
A while back my longtime
friend, Josh Breslin (Joshua Lawrence Breslin for those old enough to recognize
that name from half the alternative presses in this country, large and small,
over the past forty years or so) sent me an e-mail the contents of which I have
commented on in this space under the entry “General Assembly Blues- A
Cautionary Tale.” (See post below.)The substance of the piece was that Josh
felt that the Occupy idea was ripe for the picking by those bourgeois political
forces that were hovering around the movement lately looking like wolves ready
to feast on an easy meal. Without going into detail here he also argued that
there were some very Potemkin Village-like aspects of the Occupy Boston
movement since the police raid on December 10th (2011) scattered the
tribe. The most remarkable statement though, or at least the one which stuck in
my mind after reading his e-mail, was his characterization of Occupy as
“generals without an army.’’ That little twist has haunted me not a little
since after some thought and some further investigation I find that statement
to have some truth in it.
Now some readers of this post
will dismiss the whole notion of generals, or at least the free-wheeling use of
any military terms when speaking of the movement, out of hand. That would be
unfortunate because that expression was merely a short-hand way for Josh to say
what many people I have spoke to already sense. This “leaderless” movement has
leaders, there is nothing wrong with leaders emerging if based on doing hard
political work and winning authority, and that in a very important sense those
fairly small numbers whose lives are now entwined with the Occupy movement are
de facto leaders and that is just hard political realty. Period
And an equally hard fact is
that through the thick and thin of committee meetings, working groups, “rump”
General Assemblies (Josh’s word but there is also truth in that
characterization as well) and other forms of actions (mainly small, very small)
over the past period (and thus a mood that pre-dates the demise of Dewey
Square) is that the Occupy movement has lost much steam. Some of this was, and
should have been, expected. And perhaps with a better political focus here in
Boston that may be turned around. But the hard-headed reality is that a lot of
possibly very good cadres are spinning their wheels with no forces (or not
many) behind them. Others are just doing what comes naturally, content to
attend endless meetings, discuss endlessly, and let other hostile forces come
in and pick those very good cadres clean. Ya, sometimes Josh Breslin is
clueless on stuff but on this on he is preaching to the converted.
*********** General Assembly Blues- A Cautionary Tale
Peter Paul Markin comment:
I had never seen my old
friend Josh Breslin so irate (Joshua Lawrence Breslin for those who know him
under that moniker through his various commentary columns in all kind
alternative press operations over the past forty years or so). Or rather more
correctly I had never read anything of his that practically steamed off the
page, the computer screen page that early Monday morning (December 19, 2011,
let’s see the time stamp, oh yes, 5:14 AM, Ya early, definitely early for Josh)
when I was casually perusing my daily e-mail delete slaughter-house. It seems
that he had attended an Occupy
Boston General Assembly (GA) meeting the
night before over at the hallowed Community Church on Boylston Street (hallowed
in leftist circles, I had first gone there long ago to attend a commemoration
program for Sacco and Vanzetti). Since the police raid on the Occupy camp at
Dewey Square in the early morning hours of December 11th the GAs
have been assembling helter-skelter at various locations from the Parkman
Bandstand on the Common to various sympathetic indoor as winter sets in
locations, mainly churches, in order to keep some continuity during these
unsettled times.
At that meeting the main
order of business was a simple proposal submitted by the OB Socialist Caucus, a
loose group of organizationally-affiliated and unaffiliated people who identify
themselves with the socialist cause. The gist of the proposal was to make a
forthright statement that Occupy Boston was to be clearly identified, more
clearly identified than in any previous document, as independent of the main
bourgeois parties, the Democrats in particular, and by implication was not to
be a front or voting cattle bloc for any particular organized political
operation ready to move in like hungry wolves looking for an easy meal. This
proposal never reached a vote, a yea or nay vote, that night because it was
“blocked” well before such a vote could be taken by, as Josh called it in his
e-mail, the “Rump” assembly (see said e-mail posted below, well the gist of it
anyway). The Rump being a minority of those eighty or so brethren in attendance
that evening whose maneuver in the consensus-addled GA world stopped the
proposal in its tracks. This series of events triggered in Josh some kind of
previously well-hidden verbal explosion about the trends that he had witnessed
developing in the movement, and that had disturbed him previously. Naturally he
had to send his old compadre Peter Paul his bilious e-mail as the first step in
his “campaign” to get things off his chest.
A little explanation is in
order to gauge the seriousness of Josh’s maddened impulse and, as well, for why
I have taken the time to write this little commentary up and pushed it forward.
Josh and I go back a long way, back to the summer of love in San Francisco in
1967 when I was on Captain Crunch’s merry prankster magical mystery tour
freedom bus and I met Josh, then going under the moniker “Prince Of Love,” on
Russian Hill in that town. Ya, I know, we were just a little too self-important
on changing the name changed the person thing but that was the way it was. I
was, for a while, known as Be-Bop Benny, among other names.
Josh had, after just
graduating from high school up in Olde Saco, Maine hitch-hiked across the country
to see “what was happening.” We hit it off right away, probably because my
being from North Adamsville here in Massachusetts we were the only New
Englanders “on the bus,” even though I was a few years older. In any case our
friendship survived through thick and thin, even despite his “stealing” my
girl, Butterfly Swirl (okay, okay I will stop with the a. k. a’s), from right
under my nose during the first few days we knew each other. Part of that thick
and thin has been involvement in a long series of left-wing political struggles
where we have not always seen eye to eye but have generally been “on the right
of the angels.”
And that, roughly, brings us
to the present. Along the way, for a number of reason that shall not detain us
here, I increasingly came to socialist conclusions abut the nature of American
society and the ways to change it. Josh, while always on the cutting edge of
those same conclusions, never crossed over and has maintained a studied
non-socialist radical position very similar to many that I have run into as the
Occupy movement has gathered steam. As a paid political commentator for various
publications Josh has always kept a
certain skeptical distance from going overboard every time there is the
slightest left breeze coming in over Boston Harbor. Until now.
As I have written elsewhere
Josh, now retired, still likes to keep his hand in the mix and so has been
working on a project that may turn into a book about the Occupy Boston
experience. When he first he crossed the river from the wilds of Cambridge he
held himself pretty aloof from the doings but soon became totally enmeshed in
what was going on. I was, and still am, a lot more skeptical about where the
winds are heading. Josh though spent some nights at Dewey Square and got
involved in the camp life. He marched up and down the streets of Boston in
every possible cause. He brought food and other goods to the site when he came
over. He donated money and other resources to the efforts. He even told me that
he washed dishes (once) to help out in the kitchen one day. And believe me in
the old prankster days the Prince of Love was, well, too “important” to bow
down and get his hands wet doing anything as lowly as dishes. So this new
experiment (or rather a chance to make up for those youthful mistakes) really
energized him.
So when Joshua Lawrence
Breslin, on a darkened Monday morning, signals that something is wrong,
something is politically wrong with the direction of the movement I listen up.
And, perhaps, you should too.
*******Below I have placed the substance of the e-mail that Josh Breslin sent to me that fateful Monday December 19th morning. This is my summarization of the document which was written by him in our usual “code” and with his usual excessive use of expletives to normal ears so that it would be not understandable to “outsiders.” In short I have edited it as best I could while retaining the political direction. If Josh doesn’t like it then he can, well, sue me. Ha ha. Or better, write his own damn translation. Peter Paul Markin.
Pee Pee, [The reader is
hereby warned no to make anything out of this old-time nickname, old time going
back to childhood North Adamsville working-class neighborhood days, or else.]
You won’t believe what those arrogant airheads did last night at the so-called
GA. I call it, and you can quote me on this, the “Rump” like back in Oliver
Cromwell’s time when a bunch of cronies controlled everything, or else. They
“blocked” the proposal to have a clear statement of independence from the damn
Democrats (and Republicans too) but we know who really wants in on this
movement.
What they did was get
together enough people to block the thing even though with a simple majority it
could have gotten through. So much for democracy. For once you are right on this blocking and
consensus b.s. Now when Miss Betty [Elizabeth Warren] comes a-courting she will
have a field day. You and I have disagreed on many things but keeping the
bourgeois parties the hell away from our movement (except maybe to do “Jimmy
Higgins” work putting up chairs or licking envelopes, stuff like that) has
always been something that has united us ever since Chicago in 1968.
You should have heard the
reasons given. Naturally the old chestnut- “we don’t want to alienate anyone”
(anyone to the left of Genghis Khan, I guess). “It’s too negative.” Like the
bourgeoisie gives a damn about negativity as long as they keep their moola and
their power. “The statement we have already posted about transparency and
independence is good enough” Like that flimsy one-size-fits-all statement has
any political meaning at all. And it degenerated from there. I was so mad I had to walk out and get some
fresh air.
I am far from giving up on
this Occupy movement but in a lot of ways it really is like that guy, that
homeless camper guy, I interviewed over at Dewey Square in early November when
the weather got a little cold said. He said the place was a Potemkin Village. I
thought he meant about people not staying there overnight. But now I think he
meant the whole experiment. They, we,
are generals without any army right now and nothing that is being done lately
is calculated to break out from that situation. Were we this ruthlessly obtuse
back in the days? I hope not- Josh
Postscript from Markin:
As Isaac Deutscher said in
his speech “On Socialist Man” (1966):
“We do not maintain that
socialism is going to solve all predicaments of the human race. We are
struggling in the first instance with the predicaments that are of man’s making
and that man can resolve. May I remind you that Trotsky, for instance, speaks
of three basic tragedies—hunger, sex and death—besetting man. Hunger is the
enemy that Marxism and the modern labour movement have taken on.... Yes,
socialist man will still be pursued by sex and death; but we are convinced that
he will be better equipped than we are to cope even with these.”
*****************A Five-Point Program As Talking Points
*Jobs For All
Now!-“30 For 40”- A historic demand of the labor movement. Thirty
hours work for forty hours pay to spread the available work around. Organize the unorganized- Organize the South-
Organize Wal-Mart- Defend the right for public and private workers to
unionize.
* Defend the working
classes! No union dues for Democratic (or the stray Republican)
candidates. Spent the dough instead on organizing the unorganized and on other
labor-specific causes (good example, the November, 2011 anti-union recall
referendum in Ohio, bad example the Wisconsin gubernatorial recall race in June
2012).
*End the endless
wars!- Immediate, Unconditional Withdrawal Of All U.S./Allied Troops
(And Mercenaries) From Afghanistan! Hands Off Pakistan! Hands Off Iran! U.S. Hands Off The World!
*Fight for a social
agenda for working people!. Quality Healthcare For All! Nationalize
the colleges and universities under student-teacher-campus worker control!
Forgive student debt! Stop housing foreclosures!
*We created the
wealth, let’s take it back. Take the struggle for our daily bread off
the historic agenda. Build a workers party that fights for a workers government
to unite all the oppressed.
Emblazon on our red
banner-Labor and the oppressed must rule!