|
Workers Vanguard No. 1023
|
3 May 2013
|
Margaret Thatcher Finally Dead-Iron Lady, Rust in Hell!
The following presentation was given by comrade Olly Laing of
the Spartacist League/Britain at a public class in London on April 17. It has
been adapted for publication.
As everyone here will be only too well aware, it was Margaret
Thatcher’s funeral today: a publicly funded, pomp-filled ceremonious insult to
working people in this country and beyond. Anyone close to central London was
subjected to a salute to Thatcher by artillery used in the Falklands in 1982, in
her dirty little war against Argentina’s Galtieri dictatorship over windswept
rocks in the South Atlantic. In that conflict, Thatcher earned the title
“Butcher of the Belgrano” for a war crime: She ordered the sinking of the
Argentine battleship General Belgrano outside Britain’s own
declared war zone, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of young Argentine
conscripts.
The death of nobody but Thatcher could be celebrated by such a huge
swath of the population in this country. Just look at the “death parties,” as
the bourgeois press termed them with horror, in Glasgow, Bristol, Brixton and
Trafalgar Square. Think of the toasts raised in the pubs of former mining and
industrial areas across northern England, Wales and Scotland and in the Catholic
areas of Northern Ireland. Surely the outburst of jokes makes some new record,
from “Thatcher’s only been in hell half an hour and she’s already closed down
three furnaces” to the Scottish comedian Frankie Boyle’s “I was all for a
lavishly funded public cremation for Thatcher. Right up until she died.”
Government officials sniffed that the celebrations are “puerile” and grumbled
that some of the participants are too young to remember Thatcher. So what? They
know she’s a big part of the reason there’s no education, no jobs, no future for
them. Capturing Thatcher’s disdain for everything outside of that citadel of
finance capital, the City of London, her biographer, Charles Moore, told Radio 5
that Thatcher was “reviled in parts of the country that are less important.”
Reformists point to British society today as proof that Thatcherism
didn’t work: the devastation of the manufacturing base, insufficient and
unaffordable housing, generations of unemployed and financial deregulation for
the City. Well, Thatcherism did work for the capitalist class. This is why
Thatcher is so celebrated, not only by the bourgeoisie’s Conservative (Tory)
Party but also by Labour Party leaders: Opposition leader Ed Miliband professed
to “greatly respect her political achievements” while Tony Blair offered this
“towering political figure” his sincerest form of flattery, noting that his own
government retained “some of the changes she made in Britain.”
Distancing himself from New Labour’s fawning, maverick Member of
Parliament George Galloway objected to “spending £10 million on the canonisation
of this wicked woman,” complaining: “The comparison of Margaret Thatcher with
Mr. Churchill is utterly absurd. We’d be conducting this conversation in German
if it was not for Mr. Churchill.” Galloway’s admiration for Churchill, a
colonialist pig who engineered the starvation of millions of Bengalis during
World War II, is based on the myth that WWII was a war for “democracy” against
fascism. In fact, Churchill was defending the interests of British imperialism
against its rivals, particularly Germany. Fundamentally it was the Soviet Red
Army that smashed Hitler’s military.
The capitalist media talk about how, before Thatcher came into
office, Britain was “the sick man of Europe,” crippled by strike waves and
outdated industry. In fact, British industry had been in decline relative to its
imperialist competitors such as the U.S. and Germany since the late 19th
century. This was exacerbated by the loss of Britain’s empire and
near-bankruptcy following World War II. The bourgeoisie needed to increase their
competitiveness on the world market, that is, to ratchet up the rate of
exploitation of the working class. In the 1960s and ’70s, the Labour governments
of Harold Wilson and James Callaghan tried to do this by cutting deals with the
union tops over beer and sandwiches, through wage controls, strike ballots and a
ban on secondary picketing, and when that failed by mobilising the police and
army against striking workers.
During this period, miners, railwaymen, dockers and others waged
strikes that shook the country, led by a powerful and militant shop stewards
movement. However, while trade-union militancy was able to frustrate the
capitalist system, it could not resolve the underlying conflict. There were two
alternatives in the long term: either the bourgeoisie would be dealt with by
workers revolution or the workers would be dealt with by the bourgeoisie. As it
happened, the class struggle was derailed into electing a Labour government.
When Callaghan’s Labour government proved unable to deliver for them, the
bourgeoisie turned to Thatcher.
Anti-Union, Anti-Soviet Crusader for the Bourgeoisie
By 1990, after eleven bitter years of confrontation, Thatcher would
be ousted by her own party as protests against the poll tax swept the country.
In Scotland, where the tax was first tested out, Thatcher was so unpopular that
the Tories’ fortunes have never recovered. So it’s no surprise that in the 1979
election, the Economist noted that Callaghan stood on a “platform of
middle-ground conservatism” but Thatcher was dangerously radical and
confrontationist. The Economist came out for Thatcher anyway, for
offering the best hope to revive the economy. The bourgeoisie gambled that the
unions did not have a leadership to match Thatcher in hard class war, and that
gamble paid off.
The coal miners strike of 1984-85 was the defining event of
Thatcher’s rule. The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) represented the most
powerful and militant section of the working class. They had brought down Edward
Heath’s Conservative government in 1974, and Thatcher was out for revenge. She
decided to destroy the NUM in order to bring the trade-union movement to heel,
and she destroyed the mining industry to smash the NUM.
Thatcher’s victory over the miners was not inevitable. The miners
fought heroically against fierce state repression for 12 months. Their strike
was supported by broad sections of the working class—there were plenty of
examples of dockers and railway workers refusing to touch scab coal. But Labour
Party leader Neil Kinnock obscenely echoed Thatcher, denouncing miners for
“violence” on the picket lines against the strikebreaking cops. The leaders of
some unions openly scabherded, while the “left” union leaders mouthed fine words
but curbed the workers’ militancy. In the final analysis, it was not the
capitalist state that defeated the miners but the fifth column in the workers
movement, including the left-talking leaders of the dockers union, who sent
their striking members back to work twice during the miners strike.
We called on all unions to refuse to handle scab coal and for a
fighting triple alliance of miners, dockers and railway workers to strike
together. This would have amounted to a general strike, posing the question: who
was going to start things up again? Which class would rule? It was this
perspective the reformist Labour politicians and trade-union bureaucrats hated
and feared above all. As our paper Workers Hammer (No. 67, March 1985)
put it after the defeat of the strike:
“The NUM leadership under Arthur Scargill took this strike about
as far as it could go within a perspective of militant trade union reformism,
and still it lost. Why? Because militancy alone is not enough. From day one it
was clear that the NUM was up against the full power of the capitalist state.
What was needed was a party of revolutionary activists rooted in the trade
unions which fought tooth and nail to mobilise other unions in strike action
alongside the NUM. But all Arthur Scargill had was the Labour Party, and it
would rather see the NUM dead than organise to take on the bosses’ state in
struggle.”
In 1983, on the eve of the miners strike, Scargill was witchhunted
by the misleaders of the Trades Union Congress, aided by Gerry Healy’s Workers
Revolutionary Party, for telling the truth that imperialist-funded “free trade
union” Solidarność in Poland was anti-socialist. The failure of any delegate to
defend him signalled to Thatcher that Scargill was isolated and she could launch
her attack. For Thatcher, the miners and other militant workers represented “the
enemy within” while the Soviet Union and East European deformed workers states
were the ultimate “enemy without.” Polish Solidarność had a programme for
capitalist counterrevolution. This is why, apart from the Union of Democratic
Mineworkers who scabbed on the miners strike, it was the only “trade union”
Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan ever liked.
Those trade-union bureaucrats who were the most anti-Soviet were
also the most hostile to the miners strike. And the anti-Communist “socialists”
like the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), whose devotion to capitalist “democracy”
led them to support Solidarność, were far to the right of the majority of
striking miners. The SWP had members in the steel plants who crossed miners’
picket lines. When we exposed this at a public meeting, their founder-leader
Tony Cliff bragged about how many and where! Workers Power and (retrospectively)
the Socialist Party supported the scab ballot Thatcher and Kinnock were trying
to force on the NUM, with workers already on strike supposed to hold a strike
vote. The miners had voted with their feet; their weapon was not the
bourgeoisie’s strike laws but the picket line!
As for Lech Walesa, the leader of Solidarność, during the strike he
took a stand on behalf of his imperialist patrons, praising Thatcher as a “wise
and brave woman” in the Sunday Mirror under the headline “Why Scargill Is
Wrong—by Lech.” Walesa came to Thatcher’s funeral to pay homage with other Cold
Warriors like Henry Kissinger. (Scargill, on the other hand, lay low, reportedly
responding laconically to a friend’s text of the news “Thatcher dead”: “Scargill
alive.”)
Baroness Bigot
During the miners strike, you saw how various minorities got behind
the miners. They saw a powerful working-class struggle taking on their common
oppressor: the Thatcher government and her brutal cops. Blacks, Asians, gays,
Irish Republicans and Catholics championed the miners and gave them material
assistance. In turn, the miners came to the defence of oppressed minorities,
championing their cause even after the strike: participating in gay rights
marches, for example. The miners were predominantly white and from rural areas,
but the strike radicalised them. Many miners would say that before the strike
they never knew what it was like to be black or Asian, or to be Catholic in
Northern Ireland. After they had been on the receiving end of the cops’
violence, they could relate to that oppression.
The miners strike also impacted broader layers of the working
class. In 1984, when the IRA set off a bomb at the Tory conference, a common
joke was that the culprits should be shot because they missed Thatcher. A worker
at a car plant in Birmingham quipped that the police had better get started
rounding up suspects because there were 50 million of them. Ten years earlier,
Irish workers had been physically driven out of this same plant after the
criminal bombing of two city centre pubs was attributed to the IRA. During the
strike, in the Catholic areas of Northern Ireland banners went up: “Victory to
the Miners!” Large collections of food and money were taken up in Dublin. Irish
trade unionists said they were repaying the miners for the support British
workers gave them during the Dublin Lockout of 1913.
Thatcher personified the bourgeois onslaught against the working
class and the oppressed overall. In 1981, Thatcher saw Bobby Sands and nine
other Irish Republican hunger strikers die grisly deaths rather than discuss
their demand to be treated as political prisoners. As support grew around the
world for the men’s heroic struggle, Thatcher intoned: “Crime is crime is crime.
It is not political.” Under Thatcher, British armed forces colluded with
Loyalist death squads in the murder of Northern Irish Catholics, including Pat
Finucane, a solicitor who defended Republican prisoners. As Labour’s Peter
Mandelson recalls, when he became Northern Ireland Secretary in 1999 she advised
him: “You can’t trust the Irish, they are all liars.”
Under Thatcher, the black and Asian youth whose parents had come to
Britain in times of labour shortages were treated as a surplus population, left
to rot in areas deprived of resources. They were at the mercy of racist cops
that she spurred on. The Brixton police riots of 1981 and 1985 are hallmarks of
the Thatcher years, when blacks who tried to protest police brutality were
attacked by police and denounced by Thatcher as “criminal, criminal.”
Among the more nauseating claims about Thatcher is that by
triumphing in the male-dominated world of bourgeois politics she struck a blow
for women’s equality. Thatcher was a dedicated enemy of women’s
liberation. She attacked single mothers and unashamedly campaigned to restore
Victorian values. She openly maligned gays and managed to enact Section 28, the
first anti-gay legislation in over 100 years, which prevented the “promotion” of
homosexuality by school and local authorities. Moreover, the triumph of
movements she supported internationally—such as the reactionary mujahedin
in Afghanistan and capitalist counterrevolution in the Soviet Union and East
Europe—came at the cost of women in particular.
Thatcher spearheaded the British capitalists’ reactionary
campaigns. But some credit for the dismal situation of the trade unions in
Britain today must be given to the “old Labour” misleaders who isolated
struggles, disarmed militant workers and supported the drive for capitalist
counterrevolution in the East. When asked what her greatest achievement was,
Thatcher reportedly answered “Tony Blair and New Labour.” And under Tony Blair
the Labour Party earned its claim to the Iron Lady’s legacy, trampling on the
working class and gutting social services. Working people need a party that will
fight for our own class interests, a workers party committed to sweeping away
the bankrupt capitalist system. But we’ll take what comfort this deeply unjust
world has to offer. Eighty-seven years old, her last days spent in a suite at
the Ritz: it’s not exactly Mussolini’s end. Nevertheless, we are glad to see the
last of this exceptionally vile representative of the capitalist class, and
finally be able to “tramp the dirt down.”
