From The American Left History Blog Archives(2008)
- On American Political Discourse - A MODEST PROPOSAL-RECRUIT, RUN
INDEPENDENT LABOR MILITANTS FOR THE 2013 ELECTIONS (Updated)
Markin comment:
In 2007-2008 I, in vain,
attempted to put some energy into analyzing the blossoming American
presidential campaign since it was to be, as advertised at least, a watershed
election, for women, blacks, old white anglos, latinos, youth, etc. In the
event I had to abandon the efforts in about May of 2008 when it became obvious,
in my face obvious, that the election would be a watershed only for those who
really believed that it would be a watershed election. The four years of the
Obama presidency, the 2012 American presidential election campaign, and world
politics have only confirmed in my eyes that that abandonment was essentially
the right decision at the right time. In short, let the well- paid bourgeois
commentators go on and on with their twitter. I, we, had (have) better things
to do like fighting against the permanent wars, the permanent war economies,
the struggle for more and better jobs, and for a workers party that fights for
a workers government . More than enough to do, right? Still a look back at some
of the stuff I wrote then does not a bad feel to it. Read on.
************
This commentary was edited and updated on February
17, 2013
A MODEST PROPOSAL-RECRUIT, RUN INDEPENDENT LABOR
MILITANTS FOR THE 2008 ELECTIONS
IN THIS TIME OF THE ‘GREAT FEAR’ WE NEED CANDIDATES TO
FIGHT FOR A WORKERS GOVERNMENT.
FORGET DONKEYS, ELEPHANTS AND GREENS- BUILD A WORKERS
PARTY THAT FIGHTS FOR SOCIALISM!
I originally planned to
repost the blog below in the summer of 2007. However, two trends have forced me
to republish earlier than I planned. The first is the fact that the whole 2008
bourgeois electoral process has gone into warp speed. Yes, yes I know that
thinking about electoral politics, or any politics, in the spring of 2007 is
only for political junkies and other misbegotten types. I confess to that sin
and someday I will turn myself into the appropriate twelve-step program.
Nevertheless the campaign season goes full throttle. Thus if we are to have any
effect on the 2008 campaign on behalf of our fight for socialism we better get
in harness now.
The second trend revolves
around the periodic publication of, and commentary on, the not so startling, by
now, fact that the wealth distribution gap between the very, very rich here in
America and the rest of us has over the last few years has once again become
wider, the widest since the 1920s. In response a number of political
commentators, especially liberal commentators, have bemoaned this condition
noting that part of the problem is the very real ‘class struggle’ by the rich
and their minions. One of the better commentators on this subject the Boston
Globe Op/Ed writer Robert Kuttner, who is almost always worth reading to gauge
the pulse of the Eastern liberal part of the Democratic Party, recently placed
the blame on the fight against unionization by the corporations and their
political hangers-on. So far, no argument there. Where we part company is over
his exclusive and eternal strategy of relying on the political ‘goodwill’ of
the ‘friends of labor’ in the Democratic Party to make capitalism fairer. He
further argues that this is where labor has found its earlier successes. No,
one thousand times no. Despite Kuttner’s obviously truncated reading of labor
history (if at all) the way unions were organized, particularly in the 1930’s
the heyday of militant action, usually meant hard-fought factory and street
actions over and against those so-called ‘friends of labor’. This is the simple
truth that we must get out and have labor militant candidates shout to the rooftops.
LET OUR CAMPAIGN BEGIN.
MODEST
PROPOSAL-RECRUIT, RUN INDEPENDENT LABOR MILITANTS IN FOR THE 2006 [2013]ELECTIONS.
Updated April 2007. In the
summer of 2006 I wrote a commentary about writing in workers party candidates
based on a program for the fall 2006 elections. With the hoopla already
starting for the 2008 election cycle I repost that commentary below with that
same intention of getting thoughtful leftist to use the 2008 campaign to
further our propaganda needs.
All
“anti-parliamentarian”,“anti-state”, “non-political” anarchist or
anarcho-syndicalist brothers and sisters need read no further. This writer does
not want to sully the purity of your politics with the taint of parliamentary
electoral politics. Although I might remind you, as we remember the 70th
anniversary of the beginning of the Spanish Civil War, that your political
ancestors in Spain were more than willing to support the state and enter the
government when they got the chance- the bourgeois state and the bourgeois
government. But, we can fight that issue out later. We will, hopefully, see you
on the barricades.
As for other militants- here
is my modest proposal. Either recruit fellow labor militants or present
yourselves as candidates to run for public office, especially for Congress,
during the 2006 election cycle. Why? Even a quick glance at the news of the day
is calculated to send the most hardened politico screaming into the night. The
quagmire in Iraq, immigration walls, flag-burning amendments, anti- same-sex
marriage amendments, the threat to separation of church state raised by those
who would impose a fundamentalist Christian theocracy on the rest of us, and
the attacks on the hard fought gains of the Enlightenment posed by bogus
theories such as ‘intelligent design’. And that is just an average day.
Therefore, this election cycle provides militants, at a time when the dwindling
electorate is focused on politics, a forum to raise our program and our ideas.
We use this as a tool, like leaflets, petitions, meetings, demonstrations, etc.
to get our message across. Why should the Donkeys, Elephants, and Greens have a
monopoly on the public square?
I mentioned in the last
paragraph the idea of program. Let us face it if we do not have a program to
run on then it makes no sense for militants to run for public office. Given the
political climate our task at this time is to fight an exemplary propaganda
campaign. Our program is our banner in that fight. The Democrats and
Republicans DO NOT RUN on a program. The sum of their campaigns is to promise
not to steal from the public treasury (or at least not too much), beat their
husbands or wives or grossly compromise themselves in any manner. On second
thought, given today’s political climate, they may not promise not to beat
their husbands or wives. You get the point. Damn, even the weakest neophyte
labor militant can make a better presentation before working people that that.
In any case, this writer presents a five point program that labor militants can
run on (you knew this was coming, right?). As point five makes clear this is
not a ‘minimum’ program but a program based on our need to fight for power.
1. FIGHT FOR THE IMMEDIATE AND UNCONDITIONAL
WITHDRAWAL OF U.S. TROOPS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST NOW (OR BETTER YET, YESTERDAY)!
U.S. HANDS OFF THE WORLD! VOTE NO ON THE WAR BUDGET!
The quagmire in Iraq and
elsewhere in the Middle East (Palestine, Iran) is the fault line of American
politics today. Every bourgeois politician has to have his or her feet put to
the fire on this one. Not on some flimsy ‘sense of the Congress’ softball
motion for withdrawal next, year, in two years, or (my favorite) when the
situation is stable. Moreover, on the parliamentary level the only real vote
that matters is the vote on the war budget. All the rest is fluff. Militants
should make a point of trying to enter Congressional contests where there are
so-called anti-war Democrats or Republicans (an oxymoron, I believe) running to
make that programmatic contrast vivid.
But, one might argue, that
would split the ‘progressive’ forces. Grow up, please! That argument has grown
stale since it was first put forth in the ‘popular front’ days of the 1930’s.
If you want to end the war in Iraq fight for this no funding position on the
war budget. Otherwise the same people (yah, those progressive Democrats) who
unanimously voted for the last war budget get a free ride on the cheap. Senator
Hillary“Hawk” Clinton desperately needs to be opposed by labor militants.
Closet Republican, Democratic Senator Lieberman of Connecticut should not take
his richly deserved beating on the war issue from a dissident Democrat. By
rights this is our issue. Let us take it back.
2. FIGHT FOR A LIVING WAGE AND WORKING
CONDITIONS-UNIVERSAL FREE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL.
It is a ‘no-brainer’ that no
individual, much less families, can live on the minimum wage of $5/hr. (or
proposed $7/hr). What planet do these politicians live on? We need an immediate
fight for a living wage, full employment and decent working conditions. We need
universal free health care for all. End of story. The organized labor movement
must get off its knees and fight to organize Wal-Mart and the South. A boycott
of Wal-Mart is not enough. A successful organizing drive will, like in the
1930’s, go a long way to turning the conditions of labor around.
3. FIGHT THE ATTACKS ON THE ENLIGHTENMENT.
Down with the Death Penalty!
Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants who make it here! Stop the
Deportations! For the Separation of Church and State! Defend abortion rights!
Down with ant-same sex marriage legislation! Full public funding of education!
Stop the ‘war on drugs’, basically a war on blacks and minority youth-decriminalize
drugs! Defend political prisoners! This list of demands hardly exhausts the
“culture war” issues we defend. It is hard to believe that in the year 2006
over 200 years after the American Revolution and the French Revolution we are
fighting desperately to preserve many of the same principles that militants
fought for in those revolutions. But, so be it.
4. FIGHT FOR A WORKERS PARTY.
The Donkeys, Elephants and
Greens have had their chance. Now is the time to fight for our own party and
for the interests of our own class, the working class. Any campaigns by
independent labor militants must highlight this point. And any campaigns can
also become the nucleus of a workers party network until we get strong enough
to form at least a small party. None of these other parties, and I mean none,
are working in the interests of working people and their allies. The following
great lesson of politic today must be hammered home. Break with the Democrats,
Republicans and Greens!
5. FIGHT FOR A WORKERS AND XYZ GOVERNMENT.
THIS IS THE DEMAND THAT
SEPARATES THE MILITANTS FROM THE FAINT-HEARTED REFORMISTS. We need our own form
of government. In the old days the bourgeois republic was a progressive form of
government. Not so any more. That form of government ran out of steam about one
hundred years ago. We need a Workers Republic. We need a government based on
workers councils with a ministry (I do not dare say commissariat in case any
stray anarchists are still reading this) responsible to it. Let us face it if we
really want to get any of the good and necessary things listed above
accomplished we are not going to get it with the current form of government.
Why the XYZ part? What does
that mean? No, it is not part of an algebra lesson. What it reflects is that while
society is made up mainly of workers (of one sort or another) there are other
classes (and parts of classes) in society that we seek as allies and could
benefit from a workers government. Examples- small independent contractors,
intellectuals, the dwindling number of small farmers, and some professionals
like dentists. Yah, I like the idea of a workers and dentists government. The
point is you have got to fight for it.
Obviously any campaign based
on this program will be an exemplary propaganda campaign for the foreseeable
future. But we have to start now. Continuing to support or not challenging the
bourgeois parties does us no good now. That is for sure. While bourgeois
electoral laws do not favor independent candidacies write-in campaigns are possible.
ROLL UP YOUR SHEEVES! GET THOSE
PETITIONS SIGNED! PRINT OUT THE LEAFLETS! PAINT THOSE BANNERS! GET READY TO
SHAKE HANDS AND KISS BABIES