Thursday, September 12, 2013

Dr. Henry Morgentaler, 1923-2013-Heroic Fighter for Abortion Rights

Workers Vanguard No. 1029
6 September 2013



Dr. Henry Morgentaler, 1923-2013-Heroic Fighter for Abortion Rights

The following article originally appeared in Spartacist Canada No. 178 (Fall 2013), newspaper of our comrades of the Trotskyist League/Ligue Trotskyste.

Dr. Henry Morgentaler died in Toronto on May 29 at the age of 90. For more than 40 years, he was at the centre of the struggle for abortion rights in Canada. A tenacious fighter and a humane and compassionate man, he repeatedly risked his freedom, security and even his life in this struggle. In the early 1970s he was subjected to six years of trials despite three jury acquittals, and spent ten months in prison, suffering a heart attack after being thrown into solitary confinement. In 1983, police raided his clinics and he was again dragged through the courts for defying Canada’s reactionary abortion laws. Again, no jury would convict him.

Morgentaler’s greatest legal victory was in the Supreme Court of Canada in 1988. As a result, Canada today has no laws restricting abortion rights. Yet a patchwork of obstacles and regulations, including too few doctors and inadequate medical facilities, mean that many women lack access to this medical procedure. Morgentaler himself fought for 20 years against obstructionist provincial governments that refused to fund abortions or tried to bar him from setting up clinics. In New Brunswick, a woman needs the consent of two doctors for a publicly funded abortion. In Prince Edward Island, one cannot get an abortion at all. In Yukon and Nunavut, abortions are not performed after 12 weeks, hitting Native women harshly.

Morgentaler performed tens of thousands of abortions, and many of his patients sought to express their gratitude, for he had quite literally saved their lives. But his defiance of Canada’s abortion laws also tapped into a seemingly bottomless well of anti-woman bigotry, often laced with anti-Semitism. Abortion is socially explosive because, in giving women control over their fertility, it undermines the institution of the family, a key instrument for the oppression of women. Thus the right to free abortion on demand is inseparable from the broader struggle for the emancipation of women.

From the Lodz Ghetto to the Auschwitz Death Camp

Henry Morgentaler’s story began in Lodz, Poland where he was born in 1923, the son of ardent Jewish socialists. Poland was (and remains) overwhelmingly Catholic. Its deeply rooted anti-Semitism exploded in the mid 1930s as Jewish businesses were boycotted and Jews were barred from jobs in the civil service, in public schools and many other places. A wave of pogromist violence between 1935 and 1939 was instigated by reactionary political parties, the clergy, landowners, the intelligentsia and the bourgeoisie, leaving many hundreds dead and well over 1,000 injured. As Morgentaler told his biographer Eleanor Wright Pelrine:

“Jews were the Christ killers, and Poles were vicious and virulent in their anti-Semitism, largely on a religious basis. There were other factors, of course. Jews were used as scapegoats; they were resented for their presumed economic power and almost everything else. An anti-Semite could use any argument he liked. There was a large Jewish proletariat, a lot of poor Jews in Poland, and on the one hand the anti-Semites damned Jews as the big capitalists, and on the other as revolutionaries trying to overthrow the system.”

Morgentaler: The Doctor Who Couldn’t Turn Away (1975)

Henry’s father Josef was a well-known and respected trade unionist and member of the Jewish Socialist Labour Bund. An early target for the Nazi stormtroopers, Josef Morgentaler was arrested and tortured just weeks after the 1 September 1939 German invasion of Poland. He died in a concentration camp at the hands of the Nazis. Jews in the Lodz ghetto, which included Henry, his brother Mumek (Mike) and mother Golda, endured starvation and forced labour. When the Nazis liquidated the ghetto in 1944, the Morgentalers were shipped to Auschwitz along with many others. Near the end of the war, the brothers were sent to Dachau. Against all odds, they survived.

Postwar Canada and Social Struggles in Quebec

After the war, Henry made his way to Belgium where he studied medicine. However, he could not practice there, and he and his wife Eva, also a survivor of the death camps, managed to get to Canada in early 1950. Anti-Semitism was endemic in the Canadian ruling class. Liberal prime minister Mackenzie King had effusively praised Adolf Hitler in 1937 and his government slammed the doors to desperate Jews fleeing the Nazi Holocaust. Between 1933 and 1945, Canada took in fewer Jewish refugees than any other imperialist power: not even 5,000.

This was one of many crimes committed by the imperialists during World War II, which was no “war for democracy” but, at bottom, an interimperialist conflict for global political and economic domination. While sharply opposing all the imperialist combatants, Trotskyists stood for the unconditional military defense of the Soviet Union which, despite its Stalinist degeneration, remained a workers state where capitalist and landlord exploitation had been overthrown in the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. After the war, like their American and British senior partners, the Canadian rulers welcomed with open arms thousands of Nazi war criminals as “freedom fighters” in the imperialists’ crusade to destroy the Soviet Union.

After settling in Montreal, Morgentaler was denied entry to the English-language McGill University which, like many Canadian universities, had quotas limiting the admittance of Jews. Instead, he completed his medical studies at the francophone Université de Montréal and in 1955 established a practice in the city’s working-class, French-speaking east end.

Quebec at that time was still very much in the grip of the Catholic church; the oppression of women was profound. Divorce was prohibited, and until 1964 married women were legally deemed to lack the “capacity” even to sign contracts. The society was shaped by the national oppression of the French-speaking Québécois nation by the British-derived bourgeoisie, which worked in league with the Catholic hierarchy.

The 1960s and early ’70s saw tumultuous social upheaval in Quebec, including in the francophone working class, whose struggles were fuelled in large part by opposition to national oppression. The dominance of the Catholic church was broken. Among other things, birth rates plummeted from one of the highest in the world to one of the lowest. It was amid this turmoil that Henry Morgentaler entered the political arena as a secular humanist fighting against the confessional school system. Alongside the Mouvement Laïque de Langue Française, he launched the Committee for Neutral Schools.

At this time, abortion and all forms of contraception were illegal and Canada’s laws were among the strictest in the world. Maria Corsillo, who helped found and today manages the Scott abortion clinic in Toronto, recalls the period vividly:

“I was a seven-year-old immigrant and I used to go with women to the doctor and translate for them. ‘Tell him I can’t have another,’ they’d say to me, and the doctor would always respond, ‘There’s nothing I can do’.”

Now [Toronto], 6-13 June

By now a prominent and outspoken crusader for abortion rights, in 1967 Morgentaler addressed a parliamentary hearing calling for the legalization of abortion. He was soon besieged by desperate women pleading for abortions and in January 1968 he consciously defied the law and performed his first abortion. In 1969, the federal Liberal government of Pierre Trudeau decriminalized contraception and somewhat eased the laws against abortion while keeping it in the Criminal Code. Now, to obtain an abortion, women had to win the approval of a panel of three doctors, the degrading “therapeutic abortion committee.”

That same year, Morgentaler closed his family practice to devote himself to providing abortions. “I decided to break the law to provide a necessary medical service because women were dying at the hands of butchers and incompetent quacks, and there was no one there to help them,” he told another biographer, Catherine Dunphy. “The law was barbarous, cruel and unjust. I had been in a concentration camp, and I knew what suffering was. If I can ease suffering, I feel perfectly justified in doing so” (cited in New York Times, 29 May). He quickly became renowned for his empathy and skill. He pioneered new and safer abortion techniques, and over the years trained hundreds of doctors to perform the procedure.

Dr. Morgentaler was first charged under the new abortion law in 1970, and thus began the succession of trials and acquittals that dominated his life and the fight for abortion rights for the next two decades. He was acquitted three times by largely working-class francophone Québécois juries. In a legally unprecedented move, the Quebec Court of Appeal overturned his 1974 acquittal and sentenced him to 18 months in jail. He served ten months and was finally freed in early 1976.

Cold War II and the War on Women

In the early 1980s, access to abortion throughout Canada became even worse. In Toronto the need was desperate. In 1981, Women’s College Hospital performed just three abortions per week, while Toronto General, which received some 75 requests per day, did six per week, but only on Thursdays. Fewer and fewer hospitals even had the wretched therapeutic abortion committees. Morgentaler returned to the battle, and in 1983 opened clinics in Winnipeg and Toronto.

The backlash was swift and violent. In both cities, police staged jackboot raids on his clinics. The then-ruling Manitoba New Democratic Party was in the forefront of this persecution. The NDP’s attorney general, Roland Penner, vowed to prosecute any violations of the reactionary abortion laws, and he did. Morgentaler later spoke of his naiveté in believing that “since the NDP has a platform supporting freedom of choice, they would refrain from prosecution.” A few months later, when we interviewed Dr. Morgentaler for Women and Revolution, he told us:

“And the Winnipeg police raided the clinic twice, twice when operations were being done. They really were quasi-fascist acts. Somewhat like a police state—you know? It’s never happened before anywhere and I think that the prosecution in Winnipeg is probably one of the most vicious that I’ve ever seen.”

— “‘Pro-Life’ Gestapo Raids Abortion Clinics,” W&R No. 27 (Winter 1983-84)

State repression fuelled anti-woman violence and vile anti-Semitism. In 1983, a man armed with garden shears attacked Morgentaler outside his Toronto clinic. Soon after, arsonists tried to destroy the clinic and it was continually besieged by mobs backed by the Catholic church. These “pro-life” fanatics were the shock troops in the bourgeoisie’s war on women, part and parcel of the then escalating war on “godless communism,” which sought to roll back every working-class gain from the Russian Revolution to trade unions. This was the reactionary climate of the renewed Cold War offensive against the Soviet Union, which despite its Stalinist degeneration stood as a roadblock to the imperialists’ drive to reconquer the entire globe for capitalist exploitation.

Throughout the 1980s, the Trotskyist League stood out for our defense of the Soviet Union and the bureaucratically deformed workers states of East Europe. For this, we were frequently attacked and excluded from protests, including International Women’s Day demonstrations, by reformist leftists, feminists and their often male enforcers. The “pro-choice” reformists and feminists lined up behind the imperialist drive against the USSR, thereby trampling on women’s rights. In 1978-79, when a modernizing, Soviet-allied government in Afghanistan moved to implement modest reforms for women such as lowering the bride price and instituting education, tribalist Islamic reactionaries backed by the CIA erupted in violence and terror. When the Soviet Union sent its Red Army into Afghanistan in late 1979 at the invitation of the left-nationalist government, the reformist left internationally echoed the imperialist hue and cry against this.

Poland was a particular flashpoint. When the oppositional Solidarność movement emerged in 1980, the feminists, along with much of the left, the NDP and the labour bureaucracy, hailed this clerical-nationalist outfit, which was also promoted by the Pope and the CIA. After it consolidated around an openly reactionary program for capitalist counterrevolution a year later, we raised the call to “Stop Solidarność counterrevolution!” even as we denounced the many crimes of the ruling Stalinist bureaucracy. After Solidarność came to power in 1989, capitalism was restored. In 1993 it made virtually all abortions illegal.

The feminists who organized the abortion rights campaigns of the 1970s and ’80s generally supported the social-democratic NDP. Many were also supporters of ostensibly socialist groups which, in true reformist fashion, tailored their demands to be acceptable to bourgeois liberals. As feminists, they drew the sex line rather than the class line, framing their campaigns around single-issue calls such as “repeal the abortion laws,” later reduced to “choice.” But neither of these slogans begins to address the needs of poor, immigrant and Native women who need free and unrestricted access to abortion. The wealthy will always be able to get medical care, including abortions. Indeed, more than once during his legal trials, Morgentaler noted that his patients included the wives, sisters and daughters of the same politicians and judges that were leading the prosecution against him.

The local Toronto abortion rights coalition made its stance all too clear in 1977, when it voted down the demand for “Free abortion on demand” put forward by a representative of the Immigrant Women’s Centre. The latter withdrew from the coalition, which was so obviously stacked against poor and minority women. The Trotskyist League has always fought for free abortion on demand, for free, quality health care for all and free 24-hour childcare, part of our broader struggle for women’s liberation through socialist revolution.

Murderous War on Abortion Rights

In 1984, Dr. Morgentaler and Drs. Robert Scott and Leslie Smoling were acquitted of charges laid in Toronto the year before, a major victory in a trial in which the crown attorney equated Morgentaler, an Auschwitz survivor, with Hitler. The judge all but ordered the jury to convict. As we wrote in “All Honor to Dr. Morgentaler!” (Spartacist Canada No. 62, November 1984), “Even by standards of bourgeois ‘justice’ the trial was stacked against the doctors, and aimed at whipping up an anti-abortion frenzy.” Outrageously, the Ontario attorney general appealed, and yet another jury acquittal was set aside and a new trial ordered. Morgentaler in turn appealed to the federal Supreme Court. No friend of women’s rights, the court evidently saw that putting Morgentaler behind bars was a losing battle and accordingly determined that the abortion laws were unconstitutional.

The anti-woman bigots quickly launched a counteroffensive. As in the U.S., the violence of the 1980s gave way to the even more murderous and open terror against abortion providers of the 1990s. Morgentaler’s Toronto clinic was firebombed and destroyed in 1992. Eight doctors have been murdered in the U.S. since 1977 and there have been many more attempted murders. In Canada in 1994, Dr. Garson Romalis barely survived gunshot wounds; in 2000 he was again injured by an anti-abortion would-be murderer. In the 1990s, two other Canadian abortion providers, Drs. Hugh Short and Jack Fainman, were shot and injured.

The anti-abortion forces want to bring back the days when abortion was illegal and untold numbers of women were butchered or mutilated by back-alley or self-induced abortions. Although abortion continues to be legal, the steady drumbeat of anti-abortion reaction has recently become louder. Largely hidden from view is the continued threat of violence against abortion providers.

Conservative [Party] prime minister Stephen Harper’s hard-right coterie—including his cabinet—is full of religious “end-of-days” revivalists who are vicious opponents of abortion, gay rights, women’s rights, evolution and much else. His tenure has greatly increased the influence of Christian fundamentalists in Ottawa. Recent years have seen a flurry of reactionary bills introduced by anti-abortion MPs [Members of Parliament]. One would have made killing a fetus a separate offence when a pregnant woman was murdered. Another sought to create a parliamentary committee to debate when human life begins. More recently, three Tory MPs demanded that the RCMP [Royal Canadian Mounted Police] investigate hundreds of abortions as “homicides,” while anti-abortion bigots have started campaigning against “sex-selective” abortions as a wedge to roll back abortion rights.

The attacks on abortion rights are heavily conditioned by the level of class struggle. The working class has the social power necessary to mobilize in defense of women’s rights and those of all the oppressed. Many Canadian unions support abortion rights. But the union movement has been on the defensive for many years, and the gains won through past struggles are being rolled back everywhere by a ruling class bent on ensuring that the working class pays for the economic crisis of the capitalist system. The leaders of the unions aim to contain working-class struggle within the bounds of capitalism.

Capitalism and Women’s Liberation

Shaped by the torment of the Holocaust, Henry Morgentaler was driven, in his own words, “to feel vibrant, enjoying life, and to become a full person. To be open to experience—active and useful.... Active, as a sort of mover of history, doing something useful and important.” This powerful impulse led him to believe that “under some circumstances, it is imperative to defy authority” (Morgentaler: The Doctor Who Couldn’t Turn Away). He was an exuberant and talented man who spoke Polish, Yiddish, French and English, and could soothe a patient in almost any language. He loved women, had many affairs and was married three times. He never really stopped fighting on behalf of women and their rights.

An atheist, Morgentaler found in secular humanism a worldview that satisfied him. He was not a Marxist, but he agreed to be interviewed for our Marxist journal Women and Revolution in 1983. His interests in fighting on behalf of the oppressed went well beyond the question of abortion rights. A decade after the W&R interview, he joined other prominent intellectuals internationally in saluting a successful anti-Nazi action carried out by our German comrades, writing: “As a survivor of the Nazi Holocaust I commend the supporters of the Spartakist Workers Party and the Committee for Social Defense for removing the swastika flag near the Brandenburg Gate” (see Spartacist Canada No. 91, Spring 1993).

Henry Morgentaler’s personal and political history testifies to the fact that abortion is not a narrow “women’s issue.” Indeed, it is a class issue: an essential democratic right, the removal of which would redound against all working people. The status of women is inextricably linked to that of the working class, which is uniquely situated to bring capitalist rule, the basis for women’s oppression today, to an end. The liberation of women requires a socialist revolution that will uproot the private property system and create a worldwide socialized planned economy. Only then will society be able to replace the institution of the family with socialized childcare and housework, bringing women into full participation in all areas of social and political life.

This perspective requires the forging of a revolutionary vanguard party, entailing a struggle in the working class to break the hold of the social-democratic NDP, which is committed to upholding the rule of capital. Understanding that the interests of the capitalists and the workers are counterposed, such a party would intervene into social struggle as the most historically conscious and advanced element of the proletariat. It would defend the rights of minorities and Native people. It would advocate Quebec independence to oppose the dominant Anglo chauvinism and get the national question off the agenda. It would champion free abortion on demand, fighting for the program of women’s liberation through socialist revolution. This is the perspective fought for by the Trotskyist League/Ligue trotskyste, and it is in this spirit that we say: All honour to Dr. Morgentaler!

Imperialism and War

Workers Vanguard No. 1029
6 September 2013
TROTSKY
LENIN
Imperialism and War
(Quote of the Week)
The looming U.S. attack on neocolonial Syria is but the latest example of the predatory wars through which the imperialist powers maintain their system of brutal exploitation and oppression the world over. The drive for war under imperialism was eloquently explained in 1936 by then-Trotskyist James Burnham (under the pseudonym John West).
The truth of the matter is this: In the stage of imperialism, capitalist society is continuously at war. This is of the essence of imperialism. It is not a question of one war starting, then stopping, to be followed in a decade or two by a new war. It is war all the time, changing only in the form it takes, in the degree of violence.
Conflict at the “economic level” continues without interruption: economic struggles for sources of raw material, for new markets, for new fields of exploitation; tariff and exchange battles; competition for shipping and loans; exploration to discover new mines, oil wells, land for rubber and coffee and cotton plantations; and all the rest.
But the conflict can never remain at the purely economic level. The stakes are too high—failure at the economic level means the destruction of the defeated economic group. Therefore, the finance-capitalists must utilize constantly their political servants—the governments of their respective countries. And the governments are not slow to answer. They build up their military and naval armaments to almost unbelievable heights. They are ever ready to unseat a Central American government, threaten a native prince, wipe out “red bandits,” stop or start a revolution, send a flotilla of warships or a regiment of marines, resent an “insult to the flag,” if necessary set two countries—Bolivia and Paraguay, for example—flying at each other’s throats to settle the dispute of Standard Oil and Shell over rights to an oil field. At the beck and call of finance-capital, the government, with the guns and cruisers and airplanes, snaps quickly to attention. That, indeed, is what the governments are for....
The moral, religious, racial and ideological disguises that war wears must not be allowed to hide the fundamental conflicts which are the true source of modern war. The general conclusion is inescapable: Modern war is neither accidental nor due to the evil of human nature nor decreed by God. War is of the very essence of imperialist-capitalism, as much a part of capitalism as wage labor. To speak of capitalism without war is like speaking of a human being without lungs. The fate of one is inextricably bound to the fate of the other.
—“John West” (James Burnham), War and the Workers (1936)

Hunger Strike Against the Torture of Solitary-California Prison Hell

Workers Vanguard No. 1029
6 September 2013

Hunger Strike Against the Torture of Solitary-California Prison Hell

In early July, some 30,000 California prisoners launched their third hunger strike in two years against the barbaric torture of solitary confinement. At its peak, the strike encompassed two-thirds of the 33 state prisons and all four private out-of-state prisons that hold California inmates, making it five times the size of the strikes in 2011. Prison officials retaliated by blasting freezing air into the cells of hunger strikers and by denying them vitamins and any liquids except water for 18 days. In an L.A. Times (6 August) op-ed column titled “Hunger Strike in California Prisons is a Gang Power Play,” the head of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Jeffrey Beard, ranted that the men starving themselves to put an end to the depravity of solitary did so “to advance their own agenda of violence.”

With some 123 prisoners continuing to hold out eight weeks into the strike, a federal court judge ruled that prison doctors can force feed the remaining hunger strikers. A spokesman for the federal receiver in charge of prison medical care celebrated the court order as clearing the way to “save their lives”! Although prisoners had signed “do not resuscitate” directives, the Dr. Mengeles of the CDCR are preparing to “save” them for the torments of the Security Housing Unit’s (SHU) isolation chambers.

Welcome to Guantánamo North, where the systematic brutality is of a piece with the unspeakable sadism of the U.S. jailers abroad. With 25 percent of the prison population on the planet, the U.S. leads the world in the number of people—disproportionately black and Latino—it throws behind bars. And California leads the nation. Like Dante’s Inferno, the Italian poet’s 14th-century epic portrayal of a journey through the nine concentric circles of hell, California’s prison “Inferno” is a journey through concentric circles of increasing barbarism. Located far from inmates’ families and enclosed by lethal electric fences, “supermax” lockups like Pelican Bay State Prison contain the high-tech sensory deprivation chambers of the SHU.

Entombed behind heavy metal doors in windowless, ten-by-eight foot concrete cages for more than 22 hours a day, prisoners have no human contact other than with guards. Conditions in the SHU were powerfully captured by Shane Bauer, one of three Americans seized by the Iranian government and held incommunicado in the notorious isolation ward for political prisoners at Iran’s Envin prison. In a Mother Jones (November-December 2012) article titled “Solitary in Iran Nearly Broke Me. Then I Went Inside America’s Prisons,” Bauer describes visiting the Pelican Bay SHU, where his guide wants to know if it is different from Iran. Bauer wonders if he should “point out that I had a mattress, and they have thin pieces of foam; that the concrete open-air cell I exercised in was twice the size of the ‘dog run’ at Pelican Bay…; that I got 15 minutes of phone calls in 26 months and they get none.” Instead, he simply opts to reply that he had “a window.” The sunlight, fresh air and sounds of the outside world it afforded kept him from breaking. But in the Pelican Bay SHU “there are no windows.”

As far back as 1890, the Supreme Court condemned solitary as an “infamous punishment” that drove prisoners “violently insane.” Today prison authorities simply deny that the SHU is solitary. Unspeakably cruel, the conditions in California’s prisons are not an aberration in racist America. On the contrary, such barbarism is the product of a capitalist system that is in a state of advanced decay.

As we wrote in “Hunger Strike in California Prison Hell” (WV No. 984, 5 August 2011):

“High-tech sensory deprivation chambers like the SHU throw into stark relief the nature of the bourgeois state as an apparatus of organized violence to preserve the rule and profits of racist American capitalism.

“The prisons are the concentrated expression of the depravity of this society, a key instrument in coercing, torturing and brutalizing those who have been cast off as the useless residue of a system rooted in exploitation and racial oppression. Elementary humanity demands that the SHU and all other solitary confinement chambers be abolished. But it will take nothing short of proletarian socialist revolution to destroy the capitalists’ prison system and sweep away all the barbaric institutions of the bourgeois state.”

California Prisons: “The Worst of the Worst”

Even in the dungeon empire of “incarceration nation,” California prisons are among the worst of the worst. Conditions are so atrocious that the most reactionary Supreme Court in 60 years found them in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment.” A 2011 majority opinion recounted that California’s “prisons had operated at around 200% of design capacity for at least 11 years” during which “needless suffering and death have been the well documented result.” The court mandated that California cut its prison population to 137 percent capacity. For nearly three decades, lower courts had directed the state to relieve overcrowding, provide medical care and stop abuse by prison guards.

In the two years since the Supreme Court ruling, California’s Democratic Party governor Jerry Brown has openly flouted orders to release 9,600 prisoners. In April, a three-judge panel threatened to hold the governor in contempt of court for defying orders to provide adequate medical treatment, particularly for thousands of mentally ill prisoners who often find themselves locked in single holding cells awaiting “group therapy.” Brown defiantly retorted that his jailhouses provided “among the best healthcare in America and probably the world.”

Following this ringing endorsement, an outbreak of coccidioidomycosis, or Valley Fever, at two San Joaquin Valley prisons impelled a federal judge to grant a class-action suit by seven inmates and order the state to relocate around 2,600 prisoners to other facilities. For years, the state has opposed any such move, arguing that it could cause race riots, an open admission that segregation reigns in California prisons. Blacks, Filipinos and people with compromised immune systems are at high risk for Valley Fever, a disease that can be fatal if left untreated. In the past three years alone, close to 2,000 inmates at the two prisons have contracted the disease and in the past seven years 40 have died from it.

As the suit argued, the state’s refusal to transfer prisoners from the Valley “was the equivalent of conducting a human medical experiment on the inmates, without their consent. For an unacceptable percentage of inmates, including the plaintiff subclasses identified here, assignment to these facilities is a potential death sentence.” Here is recalled the infamous “Tuskegee experiment,” in which from 1932 to 1972 public health officials denied lifesaving penicillin to 600 black men in Alabama afflicted with syphilis.

There was, however, one medical treatment readily available in California’s prisons: forcible sterilization. From 2006 to 2010, at least 148 women inmates were coerced into undergoing tubal ligations in a throwback to the genocidal pseudoscience of eugenics. Between 1909 and 1964, California sanctioned 20,000 such operations on patients in state-run facilities under a law authorizing the sterilization of the “feebleminded,” the “diseased” and the “perverted.” This law was only repealed in 1979. But its motivation remains. When questioned about the $147,460 price tag for sterilization, one ob-gyn opined: “That isn’t a huge amount of money compared to what you save in welfare paying for these unwanted children—as they procreated more.”

The Criminalization of Black and Latino Youth

Mumia Abu-Jamal, America’s foremost class-war prisoner, knows solitary from the inside. An innocent man, this former Black Panther spent 30 years on death row in Pennsylvania on frame-up charges of killing a cop until he was released into the general prison population last year. In his “Sept. 14th Statement on Solitary” from a year ago, Mumia wrote:

“Is it cruel and unusual and thus violative of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. constitution? Apparently this was so in the 1890s but not so in the present, probably because of who was in prison then—and who are now.

“It may surprise you to know that at the end of the 19th century, Blacks were a distinct minority of American prisoners. And while numbers certainly swelled post-slavery—to build the prison-contract-labor industry, really slavery by another name—the biggest bounce in Black imprisonment came in the aftermath of the Civil Rights and Black Liberation movements, when Black people, en masse, opposed the system of white supremacy, police brutality and racist juries.”

Despite the hat-in-hand pro-Democratic Party politics of the civil rights leaders, not least Martin Luther King, America’s rulers hated and feared the spectre of black militancy. They correctly saw it as a challenge to a system of class oppression rooted in the forcible segregation of the majority of the black population at the bottom of society. Despite the stone-cold racism of George Meany’s AFL-CIO bureaucracy, labor struggles like the 1970 national postal strike in defiance of anti-strike laws amplified fears that such militancy would spill over into the organized working class with its battalions of black workers.

In 1971, Republican president Richard Nixon launched a “war on drugs,” which centrally took aim at black militants and the inner-city poor on the heels of the ghetto upheavals of the 1960s. In 1973, following the bloodbath he launched against the 1971 Attica prison rebellion, New York State Governor Nelson Rockefeller enacted draconian drug laws that became a model for other states. The “war on drugs” went into overdrive under Ronald Reagan with the avid support of black Democrats like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Today, nearly half of the 2.3 million people behind bars in the U.S. are black.

The deindustrialization of much of the U.S., exemplified today by the bankruptcy of “Motor City” Detroit, drove millions more black people out of the workforce and into the ranks of the permanently outcast. Having created the conditions condemning black as well as Latino youth to desperate poverty, the rulers branded them criminals and devised a maze of “anti-gang” laws aimed at funneling ever more of them into prison. Once again, the state of California was in the lead with its 1988 “Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act.”

Wearing “gang clothing,” having tattoos or being named by a “reliable” source is enough to be entered into the statewide CalGang database, which now has an estimated 200,000 names, including children as young as ten. Those in the database are not notified and there is no way to remove one’s name. Such gang profiling begins in the schools, where poor and minority youth are branded for life. Latinos have been a particular target, as testified by the fact that they comprise 85 percent of those in the Pelican Bay SHU.

In prison, the charge of “gang association” is all that’s needed to end up in solitary. “Evidence” of such association includes everything from tattoos to greeting cards; written material, especially by or about black freedom fighters like Mumia Abu-Jamal or even classics like Machiavelli’s The Prince and Sun Tzu’s The Art of War; jailhouse lawyering and advocacy of prison reform. As Shane Bauer wrote: “In California, an inmate facing the worst punishment our penal system has to offer short of death can’t even have a lawyer in the room. He can’t gather or present evidence in his defense. He can’t call witnesses. Much of the evidence—anything provided by informants—is confidential and thus impossible to refute.”

While the maximum confinement in the SHU for killing a guard is five years, the length of stay for “gang association” is indeterminate. Outside of death, virtually the only other road out of the SHU is “debriefing,” i.e., snitching out others as gang members. We demand an end to this Kafkaesque nightmare both inside and outside the prison walls from the anti-gang laws to solitary confinement! Decriminalize drugs and all other “crimes without victims,” such as gambling, prostitution and pornography!

The Farce of Prison “Reform”

During the hunger strike, Attorney General Eric Holder called for an end to mandatory federal sentencing for “nonviolent” drug users. Many in the Republican Party establishment have also embraced such appeals. Overwhelmingly, the concern on all sides is the cost to the government, with prisons now grotesquely seen as some kind of new “welfare” for black people. Jerry Brown, though, isn’t letting anyone go. According to the L.A. Times (22 August), the governor is now working on a plan with the California prison guard “union” and Corrections Corporation of America—the country’s largest for-profit prison enterprise—to transfer prisoners to one of its jails in the Mojave Desert.

“It’s a win-win,” boasted an official of the prison guard association. Prisoners won’t be released, and the guards will get more jobs policing the new facility. If there is any criminal gang in California’s prisons, these sadistic screws are it. But they are embraced as “union brothers” by the sellout labor misleaders. Having allowed the industrial and now public-sector unions to be savaged in the name of shared “sacrifice” while turning a blind eye to the destitution of the ghetto and barrio poor, the labor bureaucrats seek to maintain their dues base by organizing the strikebreaking cops and jailhouse thugs whose purpose is the violent suppression of the working class and oppressed. Cops and prison guards out of the unions!

The multiracial working class is the only force in capitalist society with both the social power and historic interest to eradicate a system rooted in exploitation. To unleash this power, there needs to be a political struggle to break the chains forged by the trade-union bureaucracy, which have shackled labor to its class enemy, particularly in its Democratic Party face. The purpose of the Spartacist League is to build the revolutionary party that will lead the workers in the fight to shatter the capitalist order. With the proletariat in power internationally, the vast wealth now appropriated by a tiny class of exploiters will instead provide the material basis for achieving an egalitarian communist society. The modern instruments of incarceration, torture and death will be placed alongside their medieval complements as relics of a decaying social order that deserved only to perish.

Obama Presses for Missile Strikes-No to Imperialist Attack Against Syria!

Workers Vanguard No. 1029
6 September 2013

Obama Presses for Missile Strikes-No to Imperialist Attack Against Syria!

SEPTEMBER 2—After having signaled that a military assault on Syria was imminent, Barack Obama backtracked two days ago and asked Congress to grant him authorization after it gets back in session on September 9. But the Commander-in-Chief is no less determined to order missile attacks. Obama claims that bombing Syria would be retribution for a poison gas attack on August 21 allegedly carried out by the Syrian bourgeois regime of Bashar al-Assad against his own people. In fact, the projected missile strikes are an ominous assertion of the imperialists’ power to brutalize any country whose leaders do not toe the line laid down by Washington. Factoring heavily in the calculations of the White House is Assad’s ally Iran, with Secretary of State John Kerry arguing that Tehran would “feel emboldened, in the absence of action [against Syria], to obtain nuclear weapons.”

Obama announced the pause in his march to attack after encountering unexpectedly strong opposition in foreign capitals. In Britain, the Conservative Party’s David Cameron became the first prime minister in memory to have lost a vote on military action—by some accounts since 1782, when parliament voted to stop fighting against the American colonies’ War of Independence. The opposition Labour Party, which under Prime Minister Tony Blair led Britain into wars against Serbia, Afghanistan and Iraq, put forward an amendment supporting an attack against Syria under certain conditions (like at least waiting for the UN inspectors’ report). The Labour Party amendment failed by an even greater margin than the government motion.

Among the major European powers, that left only France, the former colonial overseer of Syria, as a likely participant in the U.S.-led assault. Backing the Syrian regime is capitalist Russia, which has provided Assad with sophisticated missile defense technology and vowed to veto any military action proposed under the aegis of the United Nations. In a boost to the U.S., yesterday Saudi Arabia, one of the major backers of the jihadist component of the Syrian opposition, and the United Arab Emirates announced their support for the plan to attack Syria.

Before Obama launched U.S. warplanes to bomb Muammar el-Qaddafi’s Libya in 2011, he ostentatiously affirmed the power of the imperial presidency by refusing to seek a vote of approval by Congress. Now, with precious few coalition partners internationally and little popular support in the U.S. for military intervention in Syria, Obama has turned to Congress to share responsibility and provide him some political cover, although the administration has made it clear that it will not be bound by the vote.

The bulk of working people in the U.S., war-weary and squeezed by the years-long economic downturn, do not back an attack on Syria. A sizable section of the capitalist ruling class has its own qualms about getting bogged down in another Near East quagmire. After devastating Iraq, once a cultural center of the region, and butchering its peoples, the U.S. bourgeoisie ended up with a black eye diplomatically and a Shi’ite government in Baghdad that is a close ally of Iran.

The shadow of the war in Iraq, sold on phony reports of Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction,” has stoked widespread skepticism about the intelligence claims that the gas attack in the suburbs of Damascus was carried out by the Assad regime. Even U.S. intelligence officials acknowledge that their case is no “slam dunk.” Certainly, the imperialists are masters at fabricating provocations when they find it expedient. Recall the 1964 “Gulf of Tonkin incident,” a phony attack on a U.S. warship by North Vietnamese forces cooked up by the Lyndon Johnson administration to provide the pretext for a massive escalation of American forces in Vietnam.

In any case, what motivates the U.S. rulers is not protecting civilians from massacres. They hardly batted an eye last month when the military regime in Egypt that took power in a July coup slaughtered hundreds of protesters. On the home front, the American bourgeoisie has no shortage of blood on its hands, from the gunning down of striking rail workers in 1877 to the 1985 bombing of the largely black MOVE commune.

We do not know who is responsible for the August 21 gas attack. But as Marxists, our stance is not guided by which of the two reactionary forces in the devastating Syrian civil war was behind it. What must be understood is that it is U.S. imperialism that is the greatest danger to the working people and downtrodden of the planet. It is the duty of the proletariat, especially U.S. workers in the belly of the imperialist beast, to stand for the defense of Syria against the impending military attack by the rapacious imperialists. Our call for defense of Syria, a semicolonial country, in the military sense does not imply the least political support to that country’s reactionary Alawite-dominated regime. This is in sharp contrast to reformist organizations, such as the Greek Communist Party (KKE), that combine opposition to U.S. military intervention with political support to Assad. Nor do we support the rebels—who are largely Sunni-fundamentalist—as does much of the left in the imperialist centers.

An imperialist missile attack against Syrian military sites would necessarily strengthen the insurgents and further inflame communal tensions. The Syrian civil war is increasingly escalating into a Near East-wide Sunni versus Shi’ite communal war extending from Syria to Lebanon and Iraq. In Iraq, Sunni forces linked to Al Qaeda have stepped up bombings in Shi’ite neighborhoods, threatening a return to the orgy of sectarian bloodshed that engulfed the country in 2006-07. Lebanon is also suffering its worst sectarian violence in years, including car bombings in Beirut suburbs controlled by the Shi’ite Hezbollah, which has troops in Syria fighting on behalf of Assad. Meanwhile, since mid July rebel forces have been carrying out “ethnic cleansing” of Kurds in northeast Syria.

The spreading communal violence is being seized upon as a pretext for further U.S. military buildup in this oil-rich region. In June, General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, revealed that top U.S. commanders were seeking permission from Iraq and Lebanon to deploy troops in those countries. This would be in addition to the U.S. Patriot missile batteries and fighter planes stationed in Jordan and Turkey, the two British military bases in Cyprus and the massive U.S. military presence in the Persian Gulf. The workers movement must demand imperialist military withdrawal from the Near East.

Imperialist “Democracy” and Chemical Warfare

Obama claims to be defending an “international norm” prohibiting the use of chemical weapons. The norm is that the imperialists are fully prepared to use any means, including poison gas and other “weapons of mass destruction,” in pursuit of their interests. When imperialist forces intervened in Russia in 1919 in a failed attempt to crush the Russian Revolution, British warplanes bombarded Red Army troops with a chemical nerve agent. That same year, when Kurds in Mesopotamia rose in revolt against British occupation, Winston Churchill declared: “I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poisonous gas against uncivilised tribes.”

The Washington politicians lamenting civilian casualties in Syria represent the only ruling class to have used atomic bombs in warfare, incinerating some 200,000 Japanese civilians in August 1945 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. During the Vietnam War, U.S. forces employed massive quantities of Agent Orange defoliant and CS gas—the latter was used against insurgents holed up in tunnels—as well as burning alive untold numbers of Vietnamese villagers in napalm strikes. In Iraq, the U.S. used shells made of depleted uranium that produced radioactive dust. Scientists investigating widespread birth defects in Falluja describe it as now having “the highest rate of genetic damage in any population ever studied” and point to the depleted uranium as the likely culprit.

In 1975, the U.S. finally got around to signing the 1925 Geneva Protocol banning the use of chemical weapons, but Washington unilaterally retains the right to unleash them if an adversary uses them first. After a highly publicized promise to dispose of its gigantic stores of sarin and other chemical weapons, as of last year the U.S. still had some 2,700 tons in its stockpile.

During the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, the U.S. government was complicit as Saddam Hussein carried out horrific chemical weapons attacks. Determined to prevent an Iranian victory, Ronald Reagan’s administration provided Iraqi forces with satellite photographs of Iranian troop deployments as well as critical hands-on assistance in planning for battles and airstrikes. The U.S. did so with full knowledge that Iraqi commanders had been using chemical weapons against Iranian troops since 1983. Washington “wasn’t so horrified by Iraq’s use of gas,” one U.S. veteran of the operation told the New York Times (18 August 2002). “It was just another way of killing people.”

The sordid history of U.S. involvement in the atrocities carried out by the Hussein regime was highlighted by a number of recently declassified CIA documents published by Foreign Policy (26 August). A March 1984 CIA report noted that Iraq was using nerve gas and called it “a very good offensive as well as defensive weapon” that “could have a significant impact on Iran’s human wave tactics, forcing Iran to give up that strategy.” U.S. support to Iraqi forces continued right through the 1988 chemical weapons attack on the Kurdish town of Halabja, in which the Iraqi regime slaughtered 5,000 of its own citizens. That attack was later hypocritically decried by the George W. Bush administration as evidence of Saddam Hussein’s brutality as the U.S. was gearing up for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

As in the case of Saddam Hussein, Assad’s past services to the imperialists were quickly forgotten once Washington decided that he no longer served their purposes. In the early years of the “war on terror,” Syria was a prime destination in the “extraordinary rendition” program in which the U.S. sent terrorism suspects to other countries to be tortured. That didn’t prevent the Obama administration, once civil war broke out in Syria, from providing financial support and small arms to some insurgents while ratcheting up economic sanctions that, along with those imposed by the European Union, have crippled the Syrian economy.

Even more punishing sanctions have been imposed on Iran, which Washington and Tel Aviv perceive as attempting to challenge the Israeli monopoly of nuclear arms in the region. Although the Iranian government denies that it is developing nuclear weapons, Iran clearly needs nukes as a deterrent to the imperialists. We demand: Down with the sanctions against Iran and Syria!

For Class Struggle Against the Capitalist Rulers!

The basis for the communal conflagration that is erupting in the Near East was laid under colonial rule as the European powers set various nationalities and ethnic groups against each other. Syria, Lebanon and Iraq are not nations but rather patchworks of different peoples and ethnicities that were carved out of the collapsing Ottoman Empire by Britain and France following the First World War. In Syria, the imperialists promoted the Alawites to lord it over the predominantly Sunni population (see “Syrian Civil War: Legacy of Imperialist Divide-and-Rule,” WV No. 1009, 28 September 2012).

The international proletariat and semicolonial peoples are paying the price for the counterrevolutionary destruction of the Soviet Union in 1991-92. That historic defeat resulted in a catastrophic devastation of living conditions and culture in the former Soviet Union. It has also emboldened U.S. imperialism, which proclaimed itself the “world’s only superpower” while aggressively asserting its dominance over the globe. Today, the same reformist “socialists” who cheered the demise of the Soviet Union line up behind the imperialist-backed rebel forces in Syria, enthusing over a mythical Syrian revolution. A case in point is the International Socialist Organization (ISO), which touts the Local Coordination Committees (LCC), a network of local protest groups, as the “wellspring of the revolutionary movement” in Syria (socialistworker.org, 28 August).

In fact, the LCC openly calls for U.S. military intervention in its country. In a September 1 statement posted on its Facebook page, the LCC criticizes Obama for planning a “limited strike to merely warn Assad” instead of seeking to “paralyze” the Syrian military. The LCC demands that Obama’s military assault be “accompanied by close coordination with, and sufficient support to the Syrian opposition, both political and armed.”

The threatened attack against Syria represents the true face of imperialism, the profit-driven capitalist system in its epoch of decay. Military depredations are part of the “normal” workings of imperialism, in which the advanced industrial powers compete globally for control of markets, raw materials and access to cheap labor. This is reflected domestically in grinding poverty, racial oppression and intensified exploitation of labor by capital. The only way to put an end to this system is through international socialist revolution and the creation of a worldwide planned economy. We fight to build revolutionary workers parties as part of a reforged Trotskyist Fourth International to lead the proletariat in the struggle for power.

UNAC
(please forward widely)
With tough talk and crocodile tears for those killed in the chemical attack, President Obama made a tactical retreat from his insistence on an immediate attack on Syria. Though he left the attack option on that table, this retreat should be seen as a victory for those who oppose a new U.S. war on Syria.


The Tuesday, Sept. 10 speech took place in the context of the near total isolation of the warmaking Obama administration at home and around the world. The British parliament voted down Prime Minister David Cameron’s proposal to back the U.S. president. German Chancellor Angela Merkel opposed it as did virtually all traditional U.S. allies. No support was forthcoming from forces ranging from the Arab League to Pope Benedict XVI.

Every national poll on Syria demonstrates overwhelming majority opposition to yet another U.S. war. Overnight, a new antiwar movement is emerging in the U.S. and around the world. Aware of this mass antiwar sentiment, the U.S. Congress was poised to vote against Obama’s proposal, an action that would make the president the first in the modern era to be essentially reprimanded by the U.S. legislature.

With no immediate options before him, Obama was compelled to at least momentarily jump at Russia’s proposal that Syria put its chemical weapons into international safe keeping. The Syrian government, while accepting this proposal, nevertheless continued to insist that it did not use the chemical weapons and had no intention of doing so. To date no U.S. government agency or the United Nations team on the site has refuted this position. Indeed, Secretary of State John Kerry insisted that it was too late for the facts – too late for any UN report.

With nothing but circumstantial evidence that the chemical sarin gas attack was used by the Syrian government, Obama’s speech assumed this as fact and the basis for attacking Syria.

The U.S. record is replete with similar false allegations to justify war, from the Vietnam era Tonkin Bay “incident” that proved to be fabricated by U.S. spy agencies, to Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction” that were “proved” to exist by the Bush administration.

History demonstrates that U.S. pretexts for war are invented with impunity and with monstrous results. Four million Vietnamese died in that 10-year war along with 57,000 U.S. soldiers, many still suffering from the poison chemicals employed by the U.S. 1.5 million Iraqis died decades later; no “weapons of mass destruction” were ever found.

The U.S.-backed Saddam Hussein regime, with the approval of the U.S., employed sarin gas against the Iranian people in that eight-year war that took the lives of more than one million Iranians and Iraqis.

The international chemical weapons convention prohibits the production, storage, and use of chemical weapons. If Obama was truly concerned about chemical weapons in the region, why is he not calling for the destruction of all chemical weapons – those owned and used by allies as well as foes? This would then apply equally to the Syrian government, rebel forces, Israel, and the Egyptian military – none of which have signed the convention - and of course, the U.S., which does not adhere to international conventions and has used chemical weapons with impunity.

The U.S. government has no political, legal or moral standing to use force against any nation. The warmaking would-be cop of the world has an unbroken record of imperial interventions that have murdered millions to advance the interests of the elite few, not those of the vast majority.

The incredible revelations of Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning should suffice to caution everyone that the U.S. "national security state" will use any and all measures to advance its interests and that these "interests" have nothing in common with those of the American people.

Yet the Obama administration has not abandoned its imperial objective in Syria – to put into place yet another government subservient to the corporate objectives of the U.S. one percent.

The most remarkable and revealing statement in Obama’s speech was his assertion that “for nearly seven decades, the United States has been the anchor of global security. This has meant doing more than forging international agreements -- it has meant enforcing them. The burdens of leadership are often heavy, but the world is a better place because we have borne them.” He goes on to say: “Our ideals and principles, as well as our national security, are at stake in Syria, along with our leadership of a world where we seek to ensure that the worst weapons will never be used…. That’s what makes America different. That’s what makes us exceptional. With humility, but with resolve, let us never lose sight of that essential truth.”
This incredibly arrogant and dangerous statement of a self-appointed American ‘exceptionalism’ means that the U.S. has the right and the “burden” of acting militarily in American interests because the U.S. alone (and possibly some of our chosen allies) has ideals and principles, always of the highest order, and for the betterment of humanity.

What hypocrisy and what bald-faced lies. The 70-year record of the United States of bringing death, destruction, and domination to the world is not something Americans can be proud of. Many Americans are recognizing this ‘essential truth’ and recognizing that only we, the people, have the power and obligation to end the horror perpetrated on our planet.

The U.S. antiwar movement must seize this likely temporary moment in history to deepen its opposition to war against the people of Syria. We have won some precious time to organize a massive movement to compel the government to bring the troops, warships, and planes home now. We must continue to demand:

No U.S. War on Syria! U.S. Hands off Syria! No New U.S. Wars! Bring the Troops and War Dollars Home Now! Money for Jobs, Education and Health Care Not War!

If your antiwar or social justice organization has not yet become affiliated with UNAC, we urge you to do so now so that the movement will be in a stronger position to stop any further moves towards war. For your group to affiliate with the UNAC coalition, please click here and fill out the form.

9/12/13





To add yourself to the UNAC listserv, please send an email to: UNAC-subscribe@lists.riseup.net

Peace Action: Working for Peace Since 1957 FacebookTwitterBlogContact us
 
You are helping make history. How often have the American people risen up to stop a war before it started? Your financial support is urgently needed to help us continue our drive for peace.
Peace Action, its members, grassroots affiliates and chapters, and national staff have played a key role in not only stopping (for now) the president’s proposal to attack Syria, but demanding real alternatives and solutions based on serious multilateral diplomacy, adherence to domestic and international law and massive humanitarian aid. The people of Syria, and the region, need these things, as well as an arms embargo and a cease-fire, more than they need cruise missile attacks.
While the immediate threat of an attack has passed and hopes for diplomacy are high, there is still a serious threat that the administration and Congress may soon come back with a “compromise” resolution which could authorize a U.S. attack if diplomatic efforts to secure and disarm Syria’s chemical weapons don’t bear immediate fruit.
The best counter to that is the following from Senator Joe Manchin of West Virgina on MSNBC Tuesday night after President Obama’s speech: “Military might is not what defines a superpower. You have to have super patience. You have to have super negotiating power and diplomatic resources. And you have to have super humanitarian aid where needed. We have the possibility of doing all of that.”
Peace Action initiated an ad hoc national coalition back in June, when few groups were working on Syria, to generate a petition drive, public education and organizing resources and pressure on Congress. While other issues were a higher priority for most organizations and activists at the time, this groundwork paid off handsomely in the last few weeks as the threat of a U.S. attack grew.
In addition to collaboration with this national coalition of peace, labor, faith-based and community organizations, the mobilization in just the last few weeks by our network of Peace Action chapters and affiliates from Maine to California – vigils, protests, congressional pressure and getting our message out in the media - has been extremely impressive and effective.
Of course, as a grassroots organization, we can’t do anything without your help. Early next week we’ll get back with you on the next steps regarding Congress, as we’ll all need to remain vigilant to not only stop an attack but offer real solutions to resolve the horrible civil war in Syria.
This is also an opportunity to offer our vision of a more sustainable, peaceful, democratic and just U.S. foreign policy, which has become too heavily militarized.
Won’t you please help us continue our effective short-term work, and hold up that vision of a more peaceful world? Please give $5, $15, $100, $500 or whatever you can.
Humbly for Peace,
Kevin Martin
Executive Director
Peace Action


empowered by Salsa
PeaceNOWar.net
2013 Fall Fund Raising Appeals from National Immigrant Solidarity Network, Peace NO War Network, ActionLA Coalition and Activist Video!
Please Support our 2013 Immigrant Rights, Labor Rights, Peace and Justice Campaigns!
Can YOU spare part of your tax refunds to be part of the history and support us?
2. Write your check pay to:
National Immigrant Solidarity Network/AFGJ (For Immigrant Solidarity Projects) or
ActionLA/AFGJ (For Peace & Justice projects)

And send your check to:
ActionLA
P.O. Box 751
South Pasadena, CA 91031-0751
Dear peace and justice activists:
We 're truly appealing for your financial supports to National Immigrant Solidarity Network, and our sister projects: ActionLA Coalition and Peace No War Network. If you didn't donate last year, please help us and donate NOW!
For the 2013 we’re continue organizing the following major projects:
- New ActionLA.org website
- ActivistVideo.org and e-activism.org development
- New PeaceNOWar.net and ActionLA.org webpage
- New features for ImmigrantSolidarity.org webpage
- Immigrant Solidarity Network Monthly Immigration Alert! newsletter
- Immigrant counter-recruitment campaign
- International and China-U.S. bi-national peace & justice solidarity campaigns
- Internship and community education projects.
For the past 8 years, we had organized several historical camapigns includes:
- MayDay 2006-2011 National Immigrant Workers Mobilization! Wear White T-Shirt,organize local actions to support immigrant worker rights! WE ARE ALLHUMANS! NO ONE IS ILLEGAL! http://www.immigrantsolidarity.org/MayDay2010/
- 4/10-12, 2009 Chicago,IL: NISN National Grassroots Immigrant Strategy Conference http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org/2009Conference/
- May Day 2007/2008 national Mobilization for Immigrant Rights http://www.MayDay2007.org http://www.MayDay2008.org
- Education materials for immigrant rights campaigns, includes a new video webpage for immigrant rights: http://www.immigrantvideo.net
- July 27-29 National Immigrant Solidarity Network immigrant rights conference at Richmond, VA. http://www.2007Conference.net and the adoption of national immigrant campaign strategy for 2007-2008 [Read]
- antiwar mobilizations, community and labor rights campaigns
While we'd successfully raised some money from on-line appeal, but we had been getting LESS money then last year.
If you can help us, please DONATE to us NOW!
We are volunteers-based organization and All donations will be use for funding the important projects of: ActionLA, Peace No War Network and National Immigrant Solidarity Network, and supports the upcoming immigrant campaigns, peace and justice work and student labor internship projects next year, and the development of our new on-line activism tools: http://www.ActivistVideo.org
All donations are tax deductible!
National Immigrant Solidarity Network, ActionLA and Peace No War Network are volunteer-based organization, working on many major projects across the country to support peace, justice, labor, youth and immigrant rights. Please visit our coalition web pages: http://www.PeaceNoWar.net http://www.ActionLA.org and http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org
Write your check pay to:
National Immigrant Solidarity Network/AFGJ

And send your check to:
ActionLA
P.O. Box 751
South Pasadena, CA 91031-0751
Please support us! Every dollar counts!
Together, We'll Build A New Immigrant Rights/Civil Rights Movements!
Lee Siu Hin
National Coordinator/Co-Founder
National Immigrant Solidarity Network http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org
ActionLA Coalition http://www.ActionLA.org
Peace NO War Network http://www.PeaceNOWar.net
Activist Video Service http://www.ActivistVideo.org
=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=