From The Marxist Archives- In Honor Of The 64th Anniversary Year Of The Chinese Revolution of 1949-Communism and Human Liberation
Markin comment (repost from 2012):
On a day when we are honoring the 63rd anniversary of the Chinese revolution of 1949 the article posted in this entry and the comment below take on added meaning. In the old days, in the days when I had broken from many of my previously held left social-democratic political views and had begun to embrace Marxism with a distinct tilt toward Trotskyism, I ran into an old revolutionary in Boston who had been deeply involved (although I did not learn the extend of that involvement until later) in the pre-World War II socialist struggles in Eastern Europe. The details of that involvement will not detain us here now but the import of what he had to impart to me about the defense of revolutionary gains has stuck with me until this day. And, moreover, is germane to the subject of this article from the pen of Leon Trotsky -the defense of the Chinese revolution and the later gains of that third revolution (1949) however currently attenuated.
This old comrade, by the circumstances of his life, had escaped that pre-war scene in fascist-wracked Europe and found himself toward the end of the 1930s in New York working with the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party in the period when that organization was going through intense turmoil over the question of defense of the Soviet Union. In the history of American (and international) Trotskyism this is the famous Max Shachtman-James Burnham led opposition that declared, under one theory or another, that the previously defendable Soviet Union had changed dramatically enough in the course of a few months to be no longer worth defending by revolutionaries.
What struck him from the start about this dispute was the cavalier attitude of the anti-Soviet opposition, especially among the wet-behind-the-ears youth, on the question of that defense and consequently about the role that workers states, healthy, deformed or degenerated, as we use the terms of art in our movement, as part of the greater revolutionary strategy. Needless to say most of those who abandoned defense of the Soviet Union when there was even a smidgeon of a reason to defend it left politics and peddled their wares in academia or business. Or if they remained in politics lovingly embraced the virtues of world imperialism.
That said, the current question of defense of the Chinese Revolution hinges on those same premises that animated that old Socialist Workers Party dispute. And strangely enough (or maybe not so strangely) on the question of whether China is now irrevocably on the capitalist road, or is capitalist already (despite some very un-capitalistic economic developments over the past few years), I find that many of those who oppose that position have that same cavalier attitude the old comrade warned me against back when I was first starting out. There may come a time when we, as we had to with the Soviet Union and other workers states, say that China is no longer a workers state. But today is not that day. In the meantime study the issue, read the posted article, and more importantly, defend the gains of the Chinese Revolution.
***********
Workers Vanguard No. 965
|
24 September 2010
|
|
LENIN
|
TROTSKY
|
Communism and Human Liberation
(Quote of the Week)
In his classic work Anti-Dühring, one of the most thorough
explanations of the Marxist worldview, Friedrich Engels points to increased
labor productivity as the prime mover of social evolution. With his inspiring
vision of the communist future, Engels shows how the socialization of the means
of production will provide the material basis to liberate humanity’s all-around
creative potential.
In every society in which production has developed
spontaneously—and our present society is of this type—the situation is not that
the producers control the means of production, but that the means of production
control the producers. In such a society each new lever of production is
necessarily transformed into a new means for the subjection of the producers to
the means of production….
In making itself the master of all the means of production to use
them in accordance with a social plan, society puts an end to the former
subjection of men to their own means of production. It goes without saying that
society cannot free itself unless every individual is freed. The old mode of
production must therefore be revolutionised from top to bottom, and in
particular the former division of labour must disappear. Its place must be taken
by an organisation of production in which, on the one hand, no individual can
throw on the shoulders of others his share in productive labour, this natural
condition of human existence; and in which, on the other hand, productive
labour, instead of being a means of subjugating men, will become a means of
their emancipation, by offering each individual the opportunity to develop all
his faculties, physical and mental, in all directions and exercise them to the
full—in which, therefore, productive labour will become a pleasure instead of
being a burden.
Today this is no longer a fantasy, no longer a pious wish. With the
present development of the productive forces, the increase in production that
will follow from the very fact of the socialisation of the productive forces,
coupled with the abolition of the barriers and disturbances, and of the waste of
products and means of production, resulting from the capitalist mode of
production, will suffice, with everybody doing his share of work, to reduce the
time required for labour to a point which, measured by our present conceptions,
will be small indeed.
—Friedrich Engels, Anti-Dühring (1878)