| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This space is dedicated to the proposition that we need to know the history of the struggles on the left and of earlier progressive movements here and world-wide. If we can learn from the mistakes made in the past (as well as what went right) we can move forward in the future to create a more just and equitable society. We will be reviewing books, CDs, and movies we believe everyone needs to read, hear and look at as well as making commentary from time to time. Greg Green, site manager
Sunday, November 09, 2014
Ali Fikri
Işık, a 56-year-old conscientious objector, who has
refused to serve in the Turkish army for over 30 years, will go on trial
tomorrow, 5 November because of his refusal.
Please
forward this letter of protest (or write your own) to the
military court fax : 00-90-282-654 40
95 and/or the Turkish embassy in your country. Check here for the Turkish embassies addresses.
Thank
you.
| ||
PO Box 287 London NW6 5QU England Tel: +44 (0) 20 7267 8698payday@paydaynet.org
www.refusingtokill.net
London, 4
November 2014
To:
THE 5TH ARMY CORPS MİLİTARY COURT JUDGESHIP
ÇORLU – TEKİRDAĞ Court fax : 00-90-282-654 40 95
London
Turkish embassy email:
Sir,
We have
been alerted by activists from Turkey and the organisation War Resisters
International in the UK about the case of Mr Ali Fikri Işık, a 56-year-old man repeatedly incarcerated for his
refusal to join the army dating back to the military dictatorship in the ‘80s.
He
declared himself a conscientious objector in 2012 and faces trial on 5 November
under three more charges of “desertion”.
The fact that you may even consider
jailing a man of 56 for refusing to join the army is scandalous in itself, but
we want to remind you that he is the latest in a long list of conscientious
objectors, notably, among others, Mr Mehmet Tarhan, Mr Mehmet Bal, Mr Osman Murat Ülke and Mr Halil
Savda, all of whom have been imprisoned, and almost all tortured while in
military prison and for whom we campaigned together with their organisations and
supporters from Turkey as well as from Germany, Greece, Israel, the UK and the
US.
May we
also remind you that the Council of Europe has repeatedly found that “Turkey has
[not complied] with [its] judgement urging [it] to adopt legislation that would
prevent repetitive prosecutions and convictions of those who refuse to perform
military service for conscientious or religious reasons on grounds of persistent
disobedience of military orders.” See for instance the Council of Europe
Resolution
CM/ResDH(2007)109,
referring to the case of Mr Ülke. Mr
Tarhan,
Mr
Savda and
Mr Ülke won their
cases against Turkey in the European Court of Human Rights.
In particular the
European Court of Human Rights refers to the “civil death” to which
conscientious objectors have been subject in Turkey during various periods of
their lives. This means being deprived of documents like ID and passport, which
prevents them from getting employment, opening a bank account, getting married,
travelling abroad, etc. Mr Işık suffered this “civil
death” for 20 years.
In
conclusion, we believe that any conscientious objector in Turkey must have the
right to refuse to kill without being threatened, harassed, persecuted and sent
to jail under any circumstances, even less so when he is 56 years old.
ALI FIKRI
ISIK, NO CASE TO ANSWER!
Yours in urgency,
Giorgio
Riva
Payday men’s
network
|
according to Al
Jazeera site, this should air again this week: (click on link)
Tues (tonight, Nov 4): 8 & 9pm EST
Thurs, Nov 6: 2am EST
images added by me]
Tues (tonight, Nov 4): 8 & 9pm EST
Thurs, Nov 6: 2am EST
images added by me]
-------- Original Message --------
and so the wall of lies and false flag attacks begins to crumble, 9/11 truth is next...
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/412229
New NSA tapes prove Israel's attack on USS Liberty was deliberate In a devastating documentary aired by Al Jazeera America on October 31st, never-before-heard tapes released by the NSA prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, which killed 34 American sailors, was deliberate. The translated words of Israeli commanders and Israeli pilots from tapes obtained under the Freedom of Information Act clearly can be heard, numerous times, as confirming the identity of the Liberty as "American." The tapes include a timeline in the background which fixes the times of transmissions, and establishes that confirmation was made before and during the attack. The documentary, "The Day Israel Attacked America," is produced and directed by Richard Belfield, whose previous production credits include National Geographic TV, Discovery Channel, and Arts and Entertainment Network.
The film is structured around interviews of USS Liberty survivors....
READ ARTICLE http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/tape-released-prove-israel-s-attack-on-usaliberty-was-deliberate/article/412229
and so the wall of lies and false flag attacks begins to crumble, 9/11 truth is next...
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/412229
New NSA tapes prove Israel's attack on USS Liberty was deliberate In a devastating documentary aired by Al Jazeera America on October 31st, never-before-heard tapes released by the NSA prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, which killed 34 American sailors, was deliberate. The translated words of Israeli commanders and Israeli pilots from tapes obtained under the Freedom of Information Act clearly can be heard, numerous times, as confirming the identity of the Liberty as "American." The tapes include a timeline in the background which fixes the times of transmissions, and establishes that confirmation was made before and during the attack. The documentary, "The Day Israel Attacked America," is produced and directed by Richard Belfield, whose previous production credits include National Geographic TV, Discovery Channel, and Arts and Entertainment Network.
The film is structured around interviews of USS Liberty survivors....
READ ARTICLE http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/world/tape-released-prove-israel-s-attack-on-usaliberty-was-deliberate/article/412229
Bill Maher, Eva Longoria talk
“Food Chains” on HBO’s Real Time!
HBO show highlights Fair Food Program as “Food Chains” readies for Nov.
21 release…
Fair Food activists tuning into HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher were in for a real treat last Friday night, as “Food Chains” Executive Producer Eva Longoria joined Maher for an extended interview on the upcoming documentary, the plight of farmworkers in most of the US today, and the extraordinary advances for human rights that have taken place in Florida’s tomato industry thanks to the Fair Food Program. Getting ten minutes of airtime on HBO is the kind of mainstream exposure that the Fair Food Program only rarely receives, and Eva Longoria knocked it out of the park. Here below are three short excerpts from her interview, followed by a bonus clip with a cameo from Senator Angus King of Maine, who was also a guest on the show that night and remarkably well-versed on the Fair Food Program himself. Enjoy! |
SATURDAY: Don't miss Foreign Policy for All conference Nov 8!
Dear friend,Don't miss the Foreign Policy for All conference this Saturday! Pre-register at http://fp4a-conf.bpt.me/ to receive first choice of workshops. Or you can register at the door starting at 9am at MIT building 34, 50 Vassar St., Cambridge.
The Foreign Policy for All working paper has been posted for comment. Check it out here and post your comments to help us prepare for the discussion.
Check out the schedule of the day, workshop descriptions, and logistics, parking info and map.
I look forward to seeing you at the conference!
- -- Cole for the Foreign Policy for All working group
A Foreign Policy for All
Re-Thinking U.S. Foreign Policy for the 21st Century
Saturday November 8, 2014, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
MIT Room 34-101 • 50 Vassar St • Cambridge • Kendall T
MIT Room 34-101 • 50 Vassar St • Cambridge • Kendall T
Confirmed Speakers | ||||
Noam Chomsky, MIT Institute Professor, author, Profit Over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order | Bill Fletcher, former president, Trans Africa Forum; author, They’re Bankrupting Us! And 20 other Myths about Unions | Phyllis Bennis, director, New Internationalism Project, Institute for Policy Studies | Stephen Kinzer, Boston Globe columnist; author, The Brothers: John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and Their Secret World War | Judith Leblanc, Field Director, Peace Action; former co-chair, UFPJ; member of the Caddo Tribe of Oklahoma |
After years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, with their terrible toll of death and destruction, we are fighting again in the Middle East. But growing numbers of Americans are debating the values and goals of U.S. foreign policy, with its heavy reliance on military intervention. Why has it been so unsuccessful? What is the appropriate role for our nation in today’s world? How does our investment in a gigantic, costly military establishment affect our foreign policy decisions?
In this one-day conference, held immediately after the midterm election, we will attempt to outline a more positive vision of U.S. global engagement, one that addresses the actual security needs of people around the world and that is consistent with the principles of peace and justice for all. We will also explore the actions needed to make the changes we seek, to shift the discussion.
Read the working paper! The discussion will respond to A Foreign Policy for All, a working paper written by a Boston area working group. Read more about the Foreign Policy for All project.
Schedule and Workshops: the schedule of the day and the workshop descriptions. Pre-registered attendees will receive first choice of workshops.
Conference fee: $35; $10 for students and low income; free to MIT students; 15% discount for 5 or more people registering together. Fee includes morning coffee and lunch.
Register at fp4a-conf.bpt.me/, mail check to Massachusetts Peace Action, 11 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138; write "FP4A" on memo line. Or call in your credit card number to the office, or pay at the door. Info: 617 354 2169
Host: MIT Technology and Culture Forum
Co-Sponsors: Massachusetts Peace Action, American Friends Service Committee, MIT Western Hemisphere Association, United for Justice with Peace, Women's International League for Peace & Freedom - Boston Branch, Massachusetts Global Action, Democratic Socialists of America
Workshop Topics (more details here):
- Nuclear disarmament
- Changing U.S. foreign and military climate policy
- The U.N. and International Law: Can they help with Global Crises?
- War in the 21st Century: Drones, Space Weapons and Cyber Wars
- A Foreign Policy for All and the struggle against inequality and for social and economic justice
- Nourishing Resistance: Food and Foreign Policy
- A Foreign Policy for All in the Middle East and North Africa: Foreign Intervention, Jihadism, and Alternatives
- A Foreign Policy for All in Eastern Europe, Ukraine & Russia
- A Foreign Policy for All in Asia/Pacific: Dangers and Opportunities in the U.S.-China-Japan Triangle
- Peacebuilding
- Budgets, Values and Militarism: the Outlook for the Mass. Budget for All Campaign
- Media: Manufacturing of Consent
- Human Security in the Time of Ebola
- Building the Foreign Policy for All on Campus
For peace and justice,
Cole Harrison
Executive Director Massachusetts Peace Action |
United for
Justice with Peace is a coalition of peace and justice organizations and
community peace groups in the Greater Boston region. The UJP Coalition, formed
after September 11th, seeks global peace through social and economic
justice.
Help us continue to do this critical work! Make a donation to UJP
today
|
Reese Erlich: First Hand Report: Assad, ISIS, Obama & US Middle East Policy
When: Sunday, November 9, 2014, 6:00 pm to 8:00 pmWhere: Grace Vision Church • 80 Mt. Auburn Street • #71 bus from Harvard Square • Watertown
Foreign correspondent and investigative reporter
Reese Erlich recently returned from northern Iraq where he interviewed displaced
Yazidis, peshmerga fighters and US diplomats. He will discuss the growing
influence of extremist rebel groups and why the US bombing campaign will hurt
both Americans and people of the region. Mr. Reese's new book is Inside
Syria: the Back-story of Their Civil War and What the World Can Expect,
published by Prometheus Books and distributed by Random House.
United for
Justice with Peace is a coalition of peace and justice organizations and
community peace groups in the Greater Boston region. The UJP Coalition, formed
after September 11th, seeks global peace through social and economic
justice.
Help us continue to do this critical work! Make a donation to UJP
today.
| ||
617-383-4857 |
We Demand Peace in Iraq & Syria!
Join
us November 11th
and 15th
“I want Congress to reconvene immediately to fully debate a new “Authorization for Use of Military Force” (AUMF) that deals with Syria, Iraq, and ISIS. And when the vote comes, I want you to vote no.”
For more info or to help organize: United for Justice with Peace, 617-383-4857, info@justicewithpeace.org
Tuesday, Nov 11 12:00 pm Park Street Station Boston Rally folowed by the Armistice Day Parade of Veterans for Peace |
Saturday, Nov 15 1:00 pm Park Street Station Boston Rally and march to Downtown Crossing with a mock drone and die-in |
-
Stop the Bombing in Syria and Iraq
-
Bring the troops home now
-
Stop sending weapons into the region which are leading to so much bloodshed
-
Support humanitarian aid, through neutral institutions, for victims of the conflict
-
Support self-determination and the demilitarization of the area
As we observe Armistice
Day/Veterans Day next week, we are in a never-ending war and expanding military
intervention, this time in Syria and Iraq. Our leaders say that these new wars
will last for years. But over the past 13 years, this country has already spent
one trillion, five hundred billion dollars for wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya,
and other parts of the Middle East and South Asia. These military actions have
brought hundreds of thousands of deaths, but neither peace nor security.
Meanwhile, these hundreds of billions of dollars could have been used instead to
provide for jobs, human needs and renewable energy.
The current campaign to sell this
war has nothing to do with protecting us or the people of the area. Instead, it
is intended to secure control of the area by repressive governments and
sectarian militias allied (for the time being) with Washington. The current
bombing campaign is a violation of the U.N. Charter and the U.S. constitution.
In its sweep through Syria and Iraq, ISIS is using modern U.S. weapons that were
previously sent into the region in order to stabilize a corrupt and brutal
regime in Baghdad and to overthrow Syria’s government.
Is bombing an answer to these
sectarian conflicts? Do these actions reflect the interests of working people in
the U.S. or the peoples of the Middle East? We should not be involved militarily
in a sectarian conflict that our war in Iraq set off.
Rather, we should be support a policy of non-intervention and
self-determination. Any real and lasting solution to the problems in the region
must come from the peoples of that region themselves, not from the
Pentagon.
Call Congress at (202) 224-3121 and
say: “I want Congress to reconvene immediately to fully debate a new “Authorization for Use of Military Force” (AUMF) that deals with Syria, Iraq, and ISIS. And when the vote comes, I want you to vote no.”
For more info or to help organize: United for Justice with Peace, 617-383-4857, info@justicewithpeace.org
United for
Justice with Peace is a coalition of peace and justice organizations and
community peace groups in the Greater Boston region. The UJP Coalition, formed
after September 11th, seeks global peace through social and economic
justice.
|
We Demand Peace in Iraq & Syria!
Join
us November 11th
and 15th
“I want Congress to reconvene immediately to fully debate a new “Authorization for Use of Military Force” (AUMF) that deals with Syria, Iraq, and ISIS. And when the vote comes, I want you to vote no.”
For more info or to help organize: United for Justice with Peace, 617-383-4857, info@justicewithpeace.org
Tuesday, Nov 11 12:00 pm Park Street Station Boston Rally folowed by the Armistice Day Parade of Veterans for Peace |
Saturday, Nov 15 1:00 pm Park Street Station Boston Rally and march to Downtown Crossing with a mock drone and die-in |
-
Stop the Bombing in Syria and Iraq
-
Bring the troops home now
-
Stop sending weapons into the region which are leading to so much bloodshed
-
Support humanitarian aid, through neutral institutions, for victims of the conflict
-
Support self-determination and the demilitarization of the area
As we observe Armistice
Day/Veterans Day next week, we are in a never-ending war and expanding military
intervention, this time in Syria and Iraq. Our leaders say that these new wars
will last for years. But over the past 13 years, this country has already spent
one trillion, five hundred billion dollars for wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya,
and other parts of the Middle East and South Asia. These military actions have
brought hundreds of thousands of deaths, but neither peace nor security.
Meanwhile, these hundreds of billions of dollars could have been used instead to
provide for jobs, human needs and renewable energy.
The current campaign to sell this
war has nothing to do with protecting us or the people of the area. Instead, it
is intended to secure control of the area by repressive governments and
sectarian militias allied (for the time being) with Washington. The current
bombing campaign is a violation of the U.N. Charter and the U.S. constitution.
In its sweep through Syria and Iraq, ISIS is using modern U.S. weapons that were
previously sent into the region in order to stabilize a corrupt and brutal
regime in Baghdad and to overthrow Syria’s government.
Is bombing an answer to these
sectarian conflicts? Do these actions reflect the interests of working people in
the U.S. or the peoples of the Middle East? We should not be involved militarily
in a sectarian conflict that our war in Iraq set off.
Rather, we should be support a policy of non-intervention and
self-determination. Any real and lasting solution to the problems in the region
must come from the peoples of that region themselves, not from the
Pentagon.
Call Congress at (202) 224-3121 and
say: “I want Congress to reconvene immediately to fully debate a new “Authorization for Use of Military Force” (AUMF) that deals with Syria, Iraq, and ISIS. And when the vote comes, I want you to vote no.”
For more info or to help organize: United for Justice with Peace, 617-383-4857, info@justicewithpeace.org
United for
Justice with Peace is a coalition of peace and justice organizations and
community peace groups in the Greater Boston region. The UJP Coalition, formed
after September 11th, seeks global peace through social and economic
justice.
|
** Rasmea Defense
Committee statement
Report on trial day 3:
Rasmea takes the stand!------------------------------------------------------------Rasmea’s supporters packed the courtroom in anticipation of her taking the stand, but the day began first with the continued testimony and cross examination of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Agent Douglas Scott Pierce. Under cross by defense attorney Jim Fennerty, Pierce revealed that in a previous case, he had testified that the questions on the naturalization forms can be “confusing,” especially for those who do not have fluency in the English language, and also acknowledged that older forms previously asked specifically about crimes, arrests, imprisonment, etc., “inside or outside the United States.”
This helped set the stage for Rasmea’s argument that she had always believed that the questions she is accused of answering falsely were asking about her time in the U.S., not Palestine. After additional testimony from Jennifer Williams, the immigration officer who actually interviewed Rasmea back in 2004, and from a fingerprint expert, the prosecution rested its case.
Lead defense attorney Michael Deutsch then called University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC) professor Nadine Naber as his first witness. Naber, who is a leading scholar on Arab women and women of color in general, first met Rasmea back in 2006, and testified to their work together, describing how Rasmea’s organizing has changed the lives of hundreds of Arab immigrant women by creating a space for them to face the collective challenges they experience. Her testimony spoke to the character of Rasmea as a truthful person and mentor for her community.
Before Rasmea was called as the next witness, Judge Drain excused the jury to advise her and Deutsch on his previous rulings, reinforcing his restrictions on her testimony. He told them that she would not be able to speak about Israeli torture, stating that he did not want to “retry the case” of 1969. Rasmea responded firmly, “It’s my life, I have a right to talk about the things that happened to me!” Judge Drain refused to accede, restating that testimony referring to torture or her forced confession was inadmissible, and that if she violated his orders there would be consequences.
Nonetheless, Rasmea delivered heartfelt testimony that left the entire courtroom, as well as the overflow courtroom where dozens more were seated, in tears. She recounted her life story, one filled with tragedy and resilience, beginning with the Nakba, the “Catastrophe,” what Palestinians call the founding of the state of Israel in 1948, when 750,000 Palestinians were driven out of their homes. Rasmea and her family also lost their land and home in 1948, and were forced to live as refugees in a tent before making their way to Ramallah, where they lived at the time of the 1967 Israeli war and occupation of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and Gaza.
Then Rasmea told the jury about the Israeli raid on her home in 1969, when she was arrested along with her father and sisters. More than 500 Palestinians were swept up in mass arrests by Israel at the same time, and she broke down in tears when she recalled how the events of that night traumatized her sister to the point of an early death.
Although Rasmea was barred from testifying about the torture, she did tell the court that she spent 45 days in an interrogation center. Prosecutor Jonathan Tukel objected, and Judge Drain sustained the objection, reprimanding her. Deutsch then asked her if she was convicted, and Rasmea answered, “They convicted me falsely.” Again, the government objected and again the judge sustained the objection.
Later, Deutsch asked, “Did you try to escape?” in reference to one of Israel’s charges that the government has highlighted in this case. Rasmea answered boldly, “Of course, any political prisoner [would] try to escape!” While supporters in the overflow courtroom applauded this answer, the main courtroom heard another objection from Tukel. The judge sided with the government once more, and struck the political prisoner reference from the record.
The testimony continued with Rasmea describing her immigration to the United States, where she moved to care for her ailing father. When asked about the 1994 application for permanent residency filed in Jordan, she explained that all the answers on that form came from her brother. From the U.S., he had sent her a sample form, and she was to copy what he had written on the sample. “I couldn’t read [English], and I trust my brother. I didn’t read anything, I just copied [what] my brother said.”
When Deutsch asked about her responses on the 2004 application for naturalization, and why she had responded “No” to questions about whether she had been arrested, convicted or imprisoned, she explained that these questions followed directly three previous ones that asked explicitly about the U.S. “When I continued, my understanding was [that these questions were also] about the U.S., so I continued to say no.”
Deutsch later asked what she would have done if she had understood that the questions were intended to address imprisonment outside the U.S. as well. She answered, “If I knew it was about Israel, I would have said… It’s not a secret that I’ve been in jail. Even the embassy knows.” The U.S. embassy in Israel had become involved in the initial arrests because her father was a U.S. citizen at the time.
Rasmea will continue her testimony tomorrow, and after cross-examination by the government, both sides will make their closing arguments. The jury is not expected to begin deliberation until Monday, which is the earliest a verdict is expected.
Some 70 supporters were in the courtrooms today. Inspired by Rasmea’s incredible testimony, many are rearranging their plans to stay for Friday, and into Monday. Organizers in Detroit are scrambling to ensure housing and transportation for those who are extending their stay, and to prepare for the additional people arriving each day to join the fight for justice for Rasmea
Report on trial day 3:
Rasmea takes the stand!------------------------------------------------------------Rasmea’s supporters packed the courtroom in anticipation of her taking the stand, but the day began first with the continued testimony and cross examination of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Agent Douglas Scott Pierce. Under cross by defense attorney Jim Fennerty, Pierce revealed that in a previous case, he had testified that the questions on the naturalization forms can be “confusing,” especially for those who do not have fluency in the English language, and also acknowledged that older forms previously asked specifically about crimes, arrests, imprisonment, etc., “inside or outside the United States.”
This helped set the stage for Rasmea’s argument that she had always believed that the questions she is accused of answering falsely were asking about her time in the U.S., not Palestine. After additional testimony from Jennifer Williams, the immigration officer who actually interviewed Rasmea back in 2004, and from a fingerprint expert, the prosecution rested its case.
Lead defense attorney Michael Deutsch then called University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC) professor Nadine Naber as his first witness. Naber, who is a leading scholar on Arab women and women of color in general, first met Rasmea back in 2006, and testified to their work together, describing how Rasmea’s organizing has changed the lives of hundreds of Arab immigrant women by creating a space for them to face the collective challenges they experience. Her testimony spoke to the character of Rasmea as a truthful person and mentor for her community.
Before Rasmea was called as the next witness, Judge Drain excused the jury to advise her and Deutsch on his previous rulings, reinforcing his restrictions on her testimony. He told them that she would not be able to speak about Israeli torture, stating that he did not want to “retry the case” of 1969. Rasmea responded firmly, “It’s my life, I have a right to talk about the things that happened to me!” Judge Drain refused to accede, restating that testimony referring to torture or her forced confession was inadmissible, and that if she violated his orders there would be consequences.
Nonetheless, Rasmea delivered heartfelt testimony that left the entire courtroom, as well as the overflow courtroom where dozens more were seated, in tears. She recounted her life story, one filled with tragedy and resilience, beginning with the Nakba, the “Catastrophe,” what Palestinians call the founding of the state of Israel in 1948, when 750,000 Palestinians were driven out of their homes. Rasmea and her family also lost their land and home in 1948, and were forced to live as refugees in a tent before making their way to Ramallah, where they lived at the time of the 1967 Israeli war and occupation of the West Bank, Jerusalem, and Gaza.
Then Rasmea told the jury about the Israeli raid on her home in 1969, when she was arrested along with her father and sisters. More than 500 Palestinians were swept up in mass arrests by Israel at the same time, and she broke down in tears when she recalled how the events of that night traumatized her sister to the point of an early death.
Although Rasmea was barred from testifying about the torture, she did tell the court that she spent 45 days in an interrogation center. Prosecutor Jonathan Tukel objected, and Judge Drain sustained the objection, reprimanding her. Deutsch then asked her if she was convicted, and Rasmea answered, “They convicted me falsely.” Again, the government objected and again the judge sustained the objection.
Later, Deutsch asked, “Did you try to escape?” in reference to one of Israel’s charges that the government has highlighted in this case. Rasmea answered boldly, “Of course, any political prisoner [would] try to escape!” While supporters in the overflow courtroom applauded this answer, the main courtroom heard another objection from Tukel. The judge sided with the government once more, and struck the political prisoner reference from the record.
The testimony continued with Rasmea describing her immigration to the United States, where she moved to care for her ailing father. When asked about the 1994 application for permanent residency filed in Jordan, she explained that all the answers on that form came from her brother. From the U.S., he had sent her a sample form, and she was to copy what he had written on the sample. “I couldn’t read [English], and I trust my brother. I didn’t read anything, I just copied [what] my brother said.”
When Deutsch asked about her responses on the 2004 application for naturalization, and why she had responded “No” to questions about whether she had been arrested, convicted or imprisoned, she explained that these questions followed directly three previous ones that asked explicitly about the U.S. “When I continued, my understanding was [that these questions were also] about the U.S., so I continued to say no.”
Deutsch later asked what she would have done if she had understood that the questions were intended to address imprisonment outside the U.S. as well. She answered, “If I knew it was about Israel, I would have said… It’s not a secret that I’ve been in jail. Even the embassy knows.” The U.S. embassy in Israel had become involved in the initial arrests because her father was a U.S. citizen at the time.
Rasmea will continue her testimony tomorrow, and after cross-examination by the government, both sides will make their closing arguments. The jury is not expected to begin deliberation until Monday, which is the earliest a verdict is expected.
Some 70 supporters were in the courtrooms today. Inspired by Rasmea’s incredible testimony, many are rearranging their plans to stay for Friday, and into Monday. Organizers in Detroit are scrambling to ensure housing and transportation for those who are extending their stay, and to prepare for the additional people arriving each day to join the fight for justice for Rasmea
uspcn.org
(http://uspcn.org
)
stopfbi.net
============================================================
** follow on Twitter (https://www.twitter.com/stopfbi/ )
| ** friend on Facebook (#)
| ** forward to a friend (http://us2.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=8b7315d854bc40ca9fa6dd227&id=fdbe6a3d91&e=6b9b43cd29 )
Copyright © 2014 Committee to Stop FBI Repression, All rights reserved.
Thanks for your ongoing interest in the fight against FBI repression of anti-war and international solidarity activists!
Our mailing address is:
Committee to Stop FBI Repression
PO Box 14183
Minneapolis, MN 55414
USA
stopfbi.net
============================================================
** follow on Twitter (https://www.twitter.com/stopfbi/ )
| ** friend on Facebook (#)
| ** forward to a friend (http://us2.forward-to-friend1.com/forward?u=8b7315d854bc40ca9fa6dd227&id=fdbe6a3d91&e=6b9b43cd29 )
Copyright © 2014 Committee to Stop FBI Repression, All rights reserved.
Thanks for your ongoing interest in the fight against FBI repression of anti-war and international solidarity activists!
Our mailing address is:
Committee to Stop FBI Repression
PO Box 14183
Minneapolis, MN 55414
USA
|
"The Next Day"
MobilizationThe
Black is Back Coalition calls on everyone to take to the streets on the day
after the Ferguson grand jury says that Darren Wilson is not a
murderer
|
Watch the video of Lawrence Hamm, Black is Back Coalition member and Chairman of the People's Organization for Progress, make the call for "Next Day" actions. For more information visit blackisbackcoalition.org or call 727-821-6620. |
Black is Back Coalition for Social
Justice, Peace and Reparations
blackisbackcoalition.org • /bibcoalition @BlackisBack_ |
From Florida to
Denver, Wendy’s hears from a fed up Fair Food Nation…
With the fall picking season just around
the corner, farmworkers in Immokalee and Fair Food activists across the country
crank up creative Wendy’s actions…
Between farmworkers returning to Florida for the start of the new harvest season and allies in cooler climes taking to the streets for vibrant Fair Food protests, it is safe to say that fall is finally here! And after three great Wendy’s actions last week, you can be fairly certain that the fast food giant is also sensing a change in the air. The always inspiring Denver Fair Food, pictured above, took advantage of the Day of the Dead holiday to put together a colorful Wendy’s action in Colorado; T’ruah’s “Tomato Rabbis” headed to Wendy’s in Naples, Florida, to make their voices heard during a multi-day exchange with the CIW; and Ohio Fair Food hit up Wendy’s headquarters in Dublin, Ohio, to take the fast food chain to task for failing to support farmworker women’s rights. We’ve prepared a brief report from all these high-energy actions: First up: #TomatoRabbis visit Immokalee…
T’ruah — the “Rabbinic Call for Human Rights (that)
brings together rabbis and cantors from all streams of Judaism, together with
all members of the Jewish community, to act on the Jewish imperative to respect
and advance the human rights of all people” — brought a delegation of rabbis to
Immokalee last week for an extended visit with the CIW and a tour of the Fair
Food Program...
|
Markin comment
There is no question that
now that her trial, if one can called what took place down in Fort Meade
a trial in the summer of 2013 rather than a travesty, that a year after
her conviction on twenty plus counts and having received an outrageous
thirty-five year sentence essentially for telling us the truth about American
atrocities and nefarious actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and wherever
else the American government can stick its nose that Chelsea Manning's case has
dropped from view. Although she occasionally gets an
Op/Ed opportunity and has several legal moves going from action to
get the necessary hormonal treatments reflecting her real sexual
identity to now preparing the first appeal of her conviction to
another military tribunal the popular uproar against her imprisonment has
become a hush. While the appeals process may produce some results, perhaps a
reduction in sentence, the short way home for her is a presidential pardon
right now. I urge everybody to sign on to the Amnesty International petition
above to put the pressure on President Barack Obama for clemency.
I attended some of the sessions of
Chelsea Manning’s court-martial in the summer of 2013 and am often asked about
what she could expect from the various procedures going forward to try to
“spring” her from the clutches of the American government, or as I say whenever
I get the chance to not leave “our buddy behind” in the time-honored military
parlance. I have usually answered depending on what stage her post-conviction
case is in that her sentence was draconian by all standards for someone who did
not, although they tried to pin this on her, “aid the enemy.” Certainly Judge
Lind though she was being lenient with thirty-five years when the government
wanted sixty (and originally more before some of the counts were consolidated).
The next step was to appeal, really now that I think about it, a pro forma
appeal to the commanding general of the Washington, D.C. military district
where the trial was held. There were plenty of grounds to reduce the sentence
but General Buchanan backed up his trial judge in the winter of 2014. Leaving
Chelsea supporters right now with only the prospect of a presidential pardon to
fight for as the court appeals are put together which will take some time.
No question since her trial,
conviction, and draconian sentence of thirty-five years imposed by a vindictive
American government heroic Wiki-leaks whistle-blower Chelsea Manning’s has
fallen off the radar. The incessant news cycle which has a short life cycle
covered her case sporadically, covered the verdict, covered the sentencing and
with some snickers cover her announcement directly after the sentencing that
she wanted to live as her true self, a woman. (A fact that her supporters were
aware of prior to the announcement but agreed that the issue of her sexual
identity should not get mixed up with her heroic actions.) Since then despite
occasional public rallies and actions her case had tended, as most political prisoner
cases do, to get caught up in the appeals process and that keeps it out of the
limelight.
On Sunday October 12th
Chelsea Manning was honored and remembered by the Veterans For Peace, Smedley
Butler Brigade with a banner calling for her freedom as they marched in the
annual Honk parade which goes through Somerville, Ma into Harvard Square for
the Octoberfest. The banner drew applause and return shouts of “Free Chelsea.”
The Smedley Butler Brigade continues to stand behind our sister. We will not
leave her behind. We also urge everybody to sign the Amnesty International
on-line petition calling on President Obama to use his constitutional authority
to pardon Chelsea Manning
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/usa-one-year-after-her-conviction-chelsea-manning-must-be-released-2014-07-30
I got my start in working with anti-war
GIs back in the early 1970s after my own military service was over. After my
own service I felt a compelling need to fight the monster from the outside
after basically fruitless and difficult efforts inside. That work included helping
create a couple of GI coffeehouses near Fort Devens in Massachusetts and down
at Fort Dix in New Jersey in order for GIs to have a “friendly” space in which to
think through what they wanted to do in relationship to the military.
Some wanted help to apply for the
then tough to get discharge for conscientious objection. Tough because once
inside the military, at least this was the way things went, the military argued
against the depth of the applying soldier’s convictions and tended to dismiss
such applications out of hand. Only after a few civil court cases opened up the
application process later when the courts ruled that the military was acting arbitrarily
and capriciously in rejecting such applications out of hand did things open up
a little in that channel. Others wanted to know their rights against what they were
told by their officers and NCOs. But most, the great majority, wanted a place, a
non-military place, a non-GI club, where they could get away from the smell,
taste and macho talk of war.
Although there are still a few
places where the remnants of coffeehouses exist like the classic Oleo Strut
down at Fort Hood in Texas the wars of the past decade or so had produced no
great GI resistance. There are many reasons for this, mainly the kind of
volunteer the military accepts but probably a greater factor is that back then
was the dominance of the citizen-soldier, the draftee, in stirring things up,
stirring things up inside as a reflection of what was going on out on the
streets and on the campuses. I still believe that in the final analysis you have
to get to the “cannon fodder,” the grunts, the private soldier if you want to stop
the incessant war machine. Check out what happened, for example, on Russian the
front when the desperate soldiers left the trenches during 1917 after they got
fed up with the Czar and the whole mess.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)