Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Early Recording Found Of King's 'I Have A Dream' Speech

Early Recording Found Of King's 'I Have A Dream' Speech


[ This note was placed on the American Left History blog in regard to the passing of Julian Bond but applies to this news item as well. Please-Let's move on here from the "icons" of the civil rights movement 50 plus years ago-has anybody in the media or in politics noticed that in lots of ways the situation for black people here in America is worst than it was then-Enough of nostalgia and that great shining moment of the 1960s] 

As The Younger Leaders Of The 1960s Black Civil Rights Movement Pass- Julian Bond At 75

 
 
 
 

From The Pen Of Frank Jackman

 

You know today if you know anything about the black liberation struggle here in America (and world-wide but the parameters of the racial issues are slightly different here and better known by me so let’s leave it as here in America) you know that over the past year or so the “torch has been passed” to the younger black militants, their allies, and those around the designation Black Lives Matter trying to organize against the brutal onslaught of deep-seeded racism in “post-racial” America. Organize against the unspoken by obvious oppression that black people face each and every day they wake up in this damn country that does nothing but provide military occupation of the ghettos, allows free-wielding cop harassment and death on the streets, provides no meaningful work, cares nothing of providing serious productive education, grants no hope except dope, authorizes no home except prison and those are just the little talking points. There is plenty more of psychological, sociological and economic devastation that could be gotten into, the beating down of the American fellaheen, the death of dignity.

 

But later on that. What I want to mention right now after hearing about the death at 75 of Julian Bond an early and prominent leader of the black civil rights movement in the South and of the anti-war movement when that became the issue of the day later in the decade of the 1960s is how irrelevant those “elder statesmen” from that movement which I was intimately involved with in my youth were/are to the struggles today. How the “Uncle Tom” designation that they put on the old time leadership back then came up and bit them as they “shilled” for the government when the do-nothing Democrats were in power and shilled even louder when they were not (do-nothing for the masses for them personally plenty). While everyone has to recognize the personal bravery of these old-timers back in the day when they took on the police state-like conditions of their times they are a deadweight on today’s struggles. It is no accident that guys like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton among others are booed by today’s young black and white militants when they dare show their faces because they have abandoned whatever “better angels of their nature” it was that drove them to Doctor King’s door. The time except for a moment’s commemoration of names like King, Jackson, and Bond are over.

 

The “turn the other cheek,” the expecting of any serious help from the American government, even the notion that we are dealing with a rationale enemy on the question of race is passé. Those ideas died in Memphis in 1968, died in the battlefields of Vietnam too. So while I think back today to the sunnier days when Julian Bond was denied his seat in the Georgia legislature for his righteous opposition to the Vietnam War it is time to discard those old strategies that might have worked when the question was granting simple civil rights were at stake but are worthless when questions of life and death are on the table. RIP Julian Bond RIP.       

 



  • Playlist
  • Download
  • Embed
    Embed <iframe src="http://www.npr.org/player/embed/432542027/432542028" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">
  • Transcript
Renee Montagne talks to Jason Miller, a North Carolina State University professor, who discovered the recording, and Herbert Tillman, who attended that speech as a high school student in 1962.
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
In 1962, the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., gave a speech in Rocky Mount, N.C.
(SOUNDBITE OF SPEECH)
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR: I have a dream tonight. It is a dream rooted deeply in the American dream.
GREENE: Of course, that phrase would become far more famous when Dr. King repeated it the following year at the March on Washington. But what you just heard is a recording of the first known version of the "I Have A Dream" speech. The recording was released publically just last week. It was discovered by Jason Miller, a professor at North Carolina State. He was traveling the country researching the origins of the famous speech and ended up finding it just an hour from his office, hidden in a public library in Rocky Mount. Our colleague Renee Montagne spoke to Professor Miller, as well as Herbert Tillman, who saw Dr. King speak in Rocky Mount in 1962.
RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:
Welcome to both of you.
HERBERT TILLMAN: Thank you.
JASON MILLER: Thank you.
MONTAGNE: I would like, Professor Miller, to start with you. What was the first clue that you found?
MILLER: So the first clue I found was a old typed-out transcript that had all kinds of errors, mistakes in it, question marks because it was incomplete. And the first thing I said to myself, well, if someone was able to make an actual transcript at some point in time, there must be an audio. And so finally I was able to track down, after contacting numerous people, that it had showed up in this public library in Rocky Mount. And this reel-to-reel tape, about seven inches in diameter, was in a box with rust on it. The actual plastic on the reel was cracked, and the end of the tape was frayed. But I was very, very hopeful that it was what I thought it was because inside, in pencil, was written these words - Doctor King's speech November 27, 1962. Please do not erase.
MONTAGNE: Pretty amazing that it was even usable.
MILLER: Yeah, it was my first concern, Renee. But fortunately it hadn't had any water damage or exposure to sunlight and that's what saved it.
MONTAGNE: And, Herbert Tillman, you were a student at Booker T. Washington High School in Rocky Mount where Martin Luther King gave that speech. Take us back to the room. What would you be seeing?
TILLMAN: Basically people were shoulder to shoulder. Our auditorium wasn't large enough so we put it in the gymnasium so they were up on the bleachers and everything all around, and it was just anticipation, waiting for Martin Luther King to actually come on stage. And when he actually walked on stage, everybody just rejoiced with jubilance and excitement.
MONTAGNE: He was indeed by 1962 already a towering figure.
TILLMAN: Exactly. And what he was doing in the deep Southern states were some of the same things that were going on in Rocky Mount, N.C. and by him coming, it was giving us hope also.
MONTAGNE: Why don't we play a little bit of that tape now to take us to that moment that you, Herbert Tillman, actually experienced. And when you say he had a message that he was bringing throughout the South - let's listen now to a bit of the speech, where his message is about voting rights.
(SOUNDBITE OF SPEECH)
KING JR: We're going to break down the barriers of segregation. We must continue to register and vote in large numbers, for I am convinced that one of the most significant steps that the Negro can take at this hour is that short walk to the voting booth.
MONTAGNE: Now, you would've been a very young man - a teenager, a student.
TILLMAN: Right.
MONTAGNE: But at that time, did you think of yourself as having a chance to vote?
TILLMAN: Well, let's put it this way. At that time, even though I was in high school I had a part-time job where I would work after school. And I remember the business that I was working for stopped everything and had a meeting downstairs where they brought all the blacks, and it was getting close to time for voting. And basically what he had called all the blacks down for was to tell us that if he caught any of his black employees and found out that they were at the voting booths trying to vote that their job would be in doubt.
MONTAGNE: Let me turn you, Professor Miller, is there anything else in this Rocky Mount speech that anticipates Dr. King's famous, legendary speech in Washington, D.C.?
MILLER: There is. And during my research for my book "Origins Of The Dream," I listened to about 120 different sermons and speeches by Dr. King and I've never heard one quite like this. It has part the feel of a mass meeting, it has the formality of the civil rights speech and it has the spirit of a sermon. And Dr. King ended this speech with his three most famous endings. And he starts in what he called his "How long? Not long," set piece. Then he goes into eight lines of "I Have A Dream." That's actually two longer than the famous one in Washington.
(SOUNDBITE OF SPEECH)
JR: I have a dream tonight. (Inaudible) to do unto them. I have a dream tonight. (Inaudible) not just because of the color of their skin, but on the (inaudible) fact that they are members of the human race. I have a dream tonight.
MILLER: So this actually has more of "I Have A Dream" than the speech we all know. Third and finally, he goes into his "Let Freedom Ring" set piece which he had been using in different speeches way back to 1956.
(SOUNDBITE OF SPEECH)
JR: From every mountainside, let freedom ring. So let it ring from Stone Mountain in Georgia. Let it ring from Lookout Mountain in Tennessee.
MONTAGNE: Mr. Tillman, hearing this speech again, how did it strike you? I mean, what was the feeling like? Because you wouldn't have probably ever expected to hear it again.
TILLMAN: No I didn't expect to hear it again. And even after all this time, it kind of kicks in some of the memory recall and the emotions, you know, were very, very high. I remember how excited and how everybody applaud and clapped and was joyous. Just listening to it again made me feel the same things - I really felt all of those emotions in my heart.
MONTAGNE: I just had the impression you might have sort of a feeling of joy and also a tear in your eye.
TILLMAN: You're right. You're correct.
MONTAGNE: Well, thank you both very much for joining us.
TILLMAN: Thank you very much.
MILLER: It's been our pleasure.
GREENE: Herbert Tillman and Professor Jason Miller speaking to our colleague Renee Montagne.

Chelsea threatened with indefinite solitary confinement

Chelsea threatened with indefinite solitary confinement

petiton_3
August 12, 2015
Aside from her 35-year prison sentence, Chelsea Manning is now facing indefinite solitary confinement to be determined in a hearing next Tuesday, August 18.
contrabandWorse yet, Chelsea faces this incomprehensibly severe punishment as a result of ridiculously innocuous institutional offenses, including the possession of books and magazines related to politics and LBGTQ issues (which she received openly via the prison mail system), and having a tube of toothpaste that was past its expiration date (apparently deemed “medical mis-use”). The catalyst for this attack on Chelsea seems to have been an incident in the mess hall where she may have pushed, brushed, or accidentally knocked, a small amount of food off of her table. She then asked to speak to her lawyer when confronted by a guard. The absurd charges were tacked on later.
These charges obviously could never justify indefinite solitary confinement- one of worst forms of psychological torture. Chelsea is now regularly publishing op-eds in the Guardian newspaper, and recently won the ability to begin hormone therapy by threatening to sue the military. It’s clear this is an attempt to silence Chelsea’s voice.
Our friends at Fight for the Future (FFTF) have created a petition where you can sign on to a letter condemning the US Army’s treatment of Chelsea.
As FFTF notes, this is a disturbing attempt to silence Chelsea’s voice.Chelsea has been very active while in prison, speaking out through her twitter account about issues of government transparency, transgender rights, and the prison system. She’s been writing a regular column for The Guardian, and even wrote a bill to reform the Espionage Act and protect journalism.These absurd charges against Chelsea, and the outrageous threat of indefinite solitary confinement, are clearly an attempt to silence Chelsea’s important voice and cut her off from the outside world.We have to make sure this attempt to silence Chelsea not only fails, but backfires. Fight for the Future has created a petition to let the U.S. government know that the whole world is watching, and we won’t stand by while they jail and torture whistleblowers who stand up for democracy and free speech. Sign and share this petition right now!
Chelsea requested that her hearing be open to the press- but she was denied. If it’s not open to the public and the press, there will be no way to ensure that Chelsea isn’t unfairly subjected to one of the worst forms of psychological torture.
Below is an actual list of the charges that were sent to Chelsea (emphasis added).
charge_sheet
Here’s the list of books and magazines that were taken from Chelsea and not returned: Vanity Fair issue with Caitlyn Jenner on the cover, Advocate, OUT Magazine, Cosmopolitan issue with an interview of Chelsea, Transgender Studies Quarterly, novel about trans issues “A Safe Girl to Love,” book “Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy — The Many Faces of Anonymous,” book “I Am Malala,” 5 books by Robert Dorkin, legal documents including the Senate Torture Report, book: “Hidden Qualities that Make Us Influential.”
“Given the materials that were confiscated, it is concerning that the military and Leavenworth might be taking action for the purpose of chilling Chelsea’s speech or even with the goal of silencing her altogether by placing her in solitary,” ACLU attorney Chase Strangio wrote. “Hopefully with public scrutiny the prison will respond by dismissing these charges and ensuring that she is not unfairly targeted based on her activism, her identity, and her pending lawsuit.”

Revolutionary Chelsea Manning on cover of Counter Punch mag

Revolutionary Chelsea Manning on cover of Counter Punch mag

counterpunchChelsea Manning is depicted on the cover of the July 2015 Counter Punch magazine, along with Edward Snowden and Cornell West.
While the issue doesn’t appear to have an article about Chelsea, we really liked the artwork. Here’s what you will find in the issue:
Atomic Power’s Secret Spills:  Paul Gunter exposes one of the nation’s hidden scandals: the systemic radioactive leaks plaguing America’s nuclear power plants; The Rise of Big Generic: Steve Hendricks on how we got to the $1,200 knock-off prescription; WWII Redux: Peter Lee on the rise of Neo-Fascism from Ukraine to Japan; The Masked Face of American Racism: Ruth Fowler on race mimicry by white women; Sick Behind Bars: Thandisizwe Chimurenga provides a grim assessment of the pitiful state of medical care inside US Prisons. PLUS: Kristin Kolb on the Great Northwest in flames; Chris Floyd on the radical economics of Pope Francis; Mike Whitney on how the Fed wrecked the recovery; JoAnn Wypijewski takes a drive across the blood-stained Great Plains; Jeffrey St. Clair on the once and future ruins of the American Southwest; Lee Ballinger on the lethal legacy of Big Oil; and film-maker Ed Leer on the cinema of mass-shootings

As Chelsea Manning Speaks Out on Trans and Prison Issues, Authorities Threaten Her with Solitary

As Chelsea Manning Speaks Out on Trans and Prison Issues, Authorities Threaten Her with Solitary

 

This is viewer supported news
Imprisoned Army whistleblower Chelsea Manning is scheduled to go before a closed-door disciplinary hearing today at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, where she is serving a 35-year sentence for leaking U.S. government cables to WikiLeaks. Manning’s lawyers say she could be sent back to indefinite solitary confinement after being accused of a number of infractions including having an expired tube of toothpaste, an issue of Vanity Fair in which transgender celebrity Caitlyn Jenner describes her new life living openly as a woman, a copy of the U.S. Senate report on torture, several LGBT books and magazines and other "prohibited property" in her cell. Supporters of Manning are planning to deliver a petition today to the Army Liaison Office on Capitol Hill signed by more than 75,000 people calling on the U.S. military to drop the new charges and demanding that her disciplinary hearing be open to the press and the public. We speak to Chase Strangio, staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union and a member of Manning’s legal team.

Yes, Chelsea really is facing indefinite solitary confinement for her books and toothpaste

Yes, Chelsea really is facing indefinite solitary confinement for her books and toothpaste

By the Chelsea Manning Support Network. August 13, 2015
Aside from her 35-year prison sentence, Chelsea Manning is now facing indefinite solitary confinement to be determined in a closed hearing August 18th. Donate today to Chelsea’s legal defense fund, to beat back this attack and to help her challenge her unjust 35-year prison sentence.
chelsea manning new photo
BREAKING NEWS: First available photo of Chelsea Manning since her 2013 court martial! This was taken by prison authorities in February, shortly after she began hormone therapy (released via FOIA request).
contraband
Some of the items that Chelsea faces indefinite solitary confinement for possessing.
Chelsea faces this incomprehensibly severe punishment as a result of ridiculously innocuous institutional offenses, including the possession of books and magazines related to politics and LBGTQ issues (which she received openly via the prison mail system), and having a tube of toothpaste that was past its expiration date–deemed “medical mis-use”. The catalyst for this attack on Chelsea seems to have been an incident in the mess hall where she may have brushed, or accidentally knocked, a tiny amount of food off of her table. When aggressively confronted by a guard, she asked to speak to her lawyer.
Read the actual charge sheet for yourself here via Chelsea’s Twitter account–here are a few more pages. No, we are not kidding.
In a currently breaking Associated Press story, Chelsea’s lead attorney Nancy Hollander explains, “Prisons are very controlled environments and they try to keep them very controlled and sometimes in that control they really go too far and I think that this is going too far. … [These events] could impinge on her free speech rights and be an attempt to silence her.”
Ms. Hollander notes that she is particularly troubled by the fact that Chelsea’s reading material was taken away, including a novel about transgender issues, the book “Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy — The Many Faces of Anonymous,” the book “I am Malala,” an issue of Cosmopolitan magazine containing an interview with Manning and the US Senate report on CIA torture.

Sign the petition

Our friends at Fight for the Future have created a petition where you can sign on to a letter condemning the US Army’s attack on Chelsea.

Help us pay for Chelsea’s legal representation

Last week, before the US Army concocted this new attack on Chelsea, we launched a new effort today to finish paying for her critical legal representation. This will be critical for not only next week’s hearing, but for challenging her unjust Espionage Act conviction and draconian 35-year jail sentence.
Last week we raised $23,000 of the remaining $45,000 needed for Chelsea’s legal appeal. Thank you immensely to anyone who contributed, or who gave recently via our friends at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, who have put us within sight of our goal. For more options and information about donating to Chelsea’s defense, click here.
button
Donate today to take advantage of a $15,000 matching grant challenge!
A huge thank you to our matching grant challengers who are effectively doubling your contribution today: Michael Moore, filmmaker * Arnold Aberman * JoAnne Allen * Henry & Dwayne Bortman * Bowen Cho * Benjamin Melancon * Pat McSweeney * Bill Potvin * Nancy Quinn * Stewart Taggart * Ben Terrall

Chelsea Manning allies tell army to drop charges with 100,000-strong petition


Chelsea Manning allies tell army to drop charges with 100,000-strong petition

Delivery of petition to protest infractions involving unapproved material comes as lawyers for Manning say they have been barred from Tuesday hearing
Chelsea Manning supporters hold up banners near the Pentagon before delivering more than 100,000 signatures to the US army calling for new charges to be dropped.
Chelsea Manning supporters hold up banners near the Pentagon before delivering more than 100,000 signatures to the US army calling for new charges to be dropped. Photograph: Mike Avender/FFTF
Supporters of Chelsea Manning delivered an estimated 100,000 signatures to the US army liaison office in Congress on Tuesday, urging the military to drop charges against the whistleblower for possession of unapproved magazines and other material and to “stop harassing” her.
Manning, the US army soldier serving a 35-year military prison sentence for leaking official secrets, was charged with prison infractions for possession of unapproved material earlier this month. Later on Tuesday, she faces a hearing on the charges, which could reportedly result in solitary confinement.
Lawyers for Manning said they had been barred from the hearing at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, where Manning is serving her sentence for having been the source of the vast leak of US state secrets to WikiLeaks.
“Chelsea is facing serious repercussions and punishment if these charges are upheld, yet the prison has denied her the right to legal counsel, even legal counsel at her own expense,” said Nancy Hollander, one of Chelsea’s criminal defense attorneys, in a statement. “Now we have learned the prison authorities have denied her the use of the prison library to prepare for her hearing. The whole system is rigged against her.”
At the weekend, Manning said through supporters that she had been denied access to a prison legal library in advance of Tuesday’s hearing. A Pentagon spokesman who handles the Manning case said he would check on that claim.
Officials at the US disciplinary barracks at Fort Leavenworth, where Manning is being held, referred a reporter to the Pentagon.
Before delivering the petition, activists stood outside the Pentagon with a banner reading, “100,000 say no solitary confinement for whistleblower Chelsea Manning”. The petition, at FreeChelsea.com, was initiated by digital rights group Fight for the Future and supported by RootsAction.org, Demand Progress and CodePink.
Chelsea Manning supporters at the Pentagon.
Chelsea Manning supporters at the Pentagon. Photograph: Mike Avender
Last week, a list of contraband material confiscated from Manning was posted to her official Twitter account. The list includes copies of the magazines Out, the Advocate, Vanity Fair and Cosmopolitan; the Senate intelligence committee report on torture; and an expired tube of toothpaste.

A View From The Left-L.A. Union Tops Minimize Minimum Wage

Workers Vanguard No. 1071
10 July 2015
 
L.A. Union Tops Minimize Minimum Wage
How Low Can You Go
 
Following in the footsteps of Seattle, San Francisco and other cities, last month the Los Angeles City Council approved an ordinance to gradually raise the minimum wage from $9 to $15 by 2020, with an even longer phase-in for some workers. Days before that vote, however, a provision was put forward to exempt companies with a unionized workforce from honoring the new wage increase. One would expect such a proposal from the likes of the Chamber of Commerce, but the culprit here was Rusty Hicks, head of the AFL-CIO’s Los Angeles County Federation of Labor!
What gives? Like many pondering what happened, especially with the unions campaigning for minimum-wage ordinances nationwide, one member of the SEIU service workers union Local 721 denounced the plan as a “real slap in the face.” Workers have every reason to be angry. But for the labor misleaders there is no contradiction. Whether lobbying legislators to create a new but still poverty-level minimum wage or moving to ensure union wages can drop below that official floor, they proceed from the standpoint of what is acceptable to the capitalists.
 
Hicks tried to sell the minimum-wage waiver on the grounds that it would allow greater freedom for “employers and their employees to come to a mutual agreement that works for them”—e.g., the “freedom” for workers to sacrifice wages purportedly in exchange for other benefits. Although the union exemption in L.A. is on the back burner for now, in city after city the labor tops have succeeded in including such opt-outs in minimum-wage ordinances. As we observed in the article “Fight Poverty Wages Through Class Struggle!” (WV No. 1052, 19 September 2014), these exemptions “are an affirmation by the union tops that they will not challenge the wretched compensation they have negotiated in subservience to employer demands.”
 
Mounting any such challenge requires a willingness to engage in class battle. But the labor bureaucracy long ago renounced the very class-struggle methods to shut down services and production—mass pickets, secondary boycotts, sit-down strikes—that originally built the unions. Instead it has pursued a partnership of labor and capital, which is a fraud, and committed itself to playing by the bosses’ rules. The minimum-wage waiver is the latest in a lengthy list of ploys concocted by the union tops to entice the bosses into recognizing unions through demonstrations of their reasonableness. Such displays of “good faith” have spelled disaster for the unions, whose overall membership rate has sunk to its lowest point in a century. Offering up your soul to the devil won’t get you a free pass to heaven.
 
At one time, strong unions set a pay standard that compelled non-union employers to also lift wages. But the decades-long onslaught of anti-union attacks by the capitalist exploiters and their political henchmen in both the Democratic and Republican parties has turned the clock back on wages and work conditions for all workers. The labor bureaucracy has helped propel this race to the bottom, peddling the lie that the working class must sacrifice to keep American business competitive.
 
More than a century ago, American socialist Daniel De Leon described such conservative trade-union leaders as the “labor lieutenants of capital.” He had in mind the likes of American Federation of Labor head Samuel Gompers, a leader of the racially exclusionary, hidebound craft unions who encouraged scabbing on other unions and was a sworn enemy of socialism. But even the reactionary Gompers said that workers should demand “more.”
The minimum-wage campaign is itself minimal. Refusing to take the fight to the employers in the workplace, the union officialdom is trying to pressure the Democratic Party to “Fight for 15” in the legislative arena. Maria Elena Durazo, Hicks’s predecessor as head of the county Federation of Labor, indicated as much. According to the Los Angeles Times (13 January 2014), she noted that “most owners have opposed union organizers so adamantly that the only way to make progress was through a broader ‘living wage’ law.” Opposition by the bosses to union organizing is always adamant. Any significant gains will be won not by relying on the Democrats, who no less than the Republicans represent the interests of the capitalist exploiters, but by hard-fought class struggle, particularly at unionized workplaces in industry and along the cargo chain supplying businesses.
 
The employers want the unions out, period. Thus, the Los Angeles Times and other bourgeois media have railed against the unions over the L.A. opt-out plan, echoing a 2014 U.S. Chamber of Commerce report that condemned such exemptions for encouraging “unionization by making a labor union the potential ‘low-cost’ alternative to new wage mandates.” But far from facilitating organizing the unorganized, the more the bureaucrats accommodate the profit-hungry bosses by selling substandard contracts, the less the appeal of the unions to many workers. Nonetheless, despite their present leaderships’ bowing down before the class enemy, the unions are still the only elementary defense organizations of the working class against unbridled exploitation, offering protections that workers would not otherwise have. Notably, Fight for 15 protests have attracted combative workers who want both a wage hike and a union.
 
Pressure Politics vs. Class Struggle
 
We are for an increase in the minimum wage, as we are for any benefit that improves the conditions of the exploited and oppressed. But $15 an hour is not the “living wage” its proponents make it out to be, especially in a city as expensive as Los Angeles. It will hardly end the misery that afflicts millions in the L.A. area, notorious for the vast gulf between rich and poor and its huge concentration of homeless people. Workers affected by the new minimum wage—83 percent of whom are black, Hispanic or Asian—currently earn a median annual income of $16,000. Now they are slated to earn almost double that amount in five years, which will somewhat ease their extreme poverty. But by the admission of the labor tops, these workers will still require public assistance to barely make ends meet.
 
For much of the reformist left, a $15 minimum has become a maximum program. Pursuing liberal community organizing and petition campaigns, groups like Socialist Alternative (SAlt), Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) and Workers World Party (WWP) tail the union bureaucracy’s strategy of pressuring the Democrats to toss a few extra crumbs to the workers and oppressed. Such activity is premised on the myth that capitalism can be reformed to serve the interests of working people. In fact, the only way to meet the felt needs of the working masses is to overturn capitalism through socialist revolution.
 
SAlt’s Kshama Sawant made $15 an hour a centerpiece of her successful bid for Seattle City Council in 2013, but that didn’t stop her from engineering an alternate ballot initiative that included an opt-out clause exempting HERE hotel workers from a higher minimum wage. In the end, the Seattle $15 ordinance, which contains a variety of loopholes, ended up passing without a union exemption. But now SAlt’s Philip Locker, political director of Sawant’s re-election campaign, tries to weasel around her scandalous support for the earlier measure by claiming that “15 Now” (SAlt’s version of Fight for 15) is “extremely skeptical of collective bargaining opt-outs.” He then adds that such opt-outs could be of benefit and that in the case of L.A., the issue “should be decided by the workers and union activists” (aljazeera.com, 29 May).
 
The PSL also waxes ecstatic about the L.A. City Council’s vote for a wage hike while alibiing the AFL-CIO’s union exemption scheme. These opportunists sound every bit like garden-variety bureaucrats, upholding the framework of zero-sum contract haggling: “The AFL-CIO argues for this exemption because they know that workers in some circumstances could decide at a bargaining table to demand and get a benefit that meant more to the workers in exchange for having a wage slightly below the minimum” (Liberation, 5 June). PSL does comment, in staggering understatement: “The exemption in this case is not a powerful step to greater power”!
 
For its part, the WWP-supported Los Angeles Workers Assembly correctly points out that Hicks’s scheme would “discourage workers from wanting to join unions” and encourage “businesses to create company unions” to pay their workers a sub-minimum wage (workers.org, 1 June). But what WWP has to offer is more of the same: herding workers and the oppressed to the ballot box. The entire strategy of the Workers Assembly has consisted of putting forward a separate ballot initiative that would give both union and non-union workers a $15 wage that would take effect immediately if approved by voters.
 
Let’s get real: Wages, benefits and working conditions are ultimately determined by class struggle. Based on their potential social power to bring the capitalist production system to a halt, workers can beat back the bourgeoisie’s unrelenting attacks of the last few decades, restore the ground they have lost and revive the unions. But as long as the labor movement remains saddled with misleaders who are bound hand and foot to the dictates of capitalist profitability—including by squandering union dues to elect Democratic politicians—the working class will continue to take it on the chin in this one-sided class war.
 
It is in the crucible of heightened class conflict that a new workers leadership in the unions can be forged. This is not simply a question of militancy in defense of the existing unions. If the workers are to consistently struggle not only in their own interests but in the interests of all the oppressed, there must be a hard political fight to break labor’s ties to the Democratic Party and oust the present sellouts atop the unions. A new, class-struggle union leadership will not only seek to win battles on the picket lines but also be uncompromisingly dedicated to the liberation of humanity from the exploitation, all-sided misery and war that are inherent to a system based on production for profit rather than human need. Striving to forge such a leadership is an integral part of the fight for a multiracial revolutionary workers party whose aim is no less than doing away with the entire system of capitalist wage slavery.

0

I Did It My Way-With Bob Dylan’s Shadows In The Night In Mind



 

 

 

 


Recently I did a review of Bob Dylan’s latest CD brought out in 2014, Shadows In The Night, a tribute to the king of Tin Pan Alley songwriter fest Frank Sinatra. In that review I noted that such an effort was bound to happen if Dylan lived long enough. Going back to the Great Depression/World War II period that our parents, we the baby-boomers parents slogged through for musical inspiration. Going back to something, some place that when were young and immortal, young and thinking that what we had created would last forever we would have, rightly, dismissed out of hand. And since Dylan has lived long enough, long enough to go back to some bygones roots  here we are talking about something that let us say in 1970 I would have dismissed as impossible, dismissed as the delusional ravings of somebody like my brother who hated almost everything about the counter-cultural movement of the 1960s, had been ready to spill blood it seemed to cut off the heads of anybody who wanted to breathe a new fresh breath not tinged with our parents’ worn out ways of doing business in civil society.

Strange as it may seem to a generation, the generation of ’68, today’s AARP generation, okay, baby-boomers who came of age with the clarion call put forth musically by Bob Dylan and others to dramatically break with the music of our parents’ pasts, the music that got them through the Great Depression and slogging through World War II, he has put out an album featuring the work of Mr. Frank Sinatra the king of that era in many our parents’ households. The music of the Broadway shows, Tin Pan Alley, Cole Porter/Irving Berlin/ the Gershwins/Jerome Kern, have I mssed anybody of important, probably, probably missed some of those Rogers and Hart Broadway show tunes teams, and so on. That proposition though, at least as it pertains to Bob Dylan as an individual, seems less strange if you are not totally mired in the Bob Dylan protest minute of the early 1960s when he, whether he wanted that designation or not, was the “voice of a generation,” catching the new breeze a lot of us felt coming through the land. (In the end he did not want it, did not want to be the voice of a generation, although he liked and wanted to be king of the hill in the music department of that generation, no question. Wanted too to be the king hell troubadour entertaining the world for as long as he drew breathe and he has accomplished that.)

What Dylan has been about for the greater part of his career has been as an entertainer, a guy who sings his songs to the crowd and hopes they share his feelings for his songs. As he is quoted as saying in a recent AARP magazine article connected with the release of his Frank Sinatra tribute what he hoped was that like Frank he sang to, not at, his audience. Just like Frank did when he was in high tide around the 1940s and 1950s. That sensibility is emphatically not what the folk protest music ethos was about but rather about stirring up the troops, stirring up the latter day Gideon’s army to go smite the dragon. Dylan early on came close, then drew back, and it is hard to think of anybody from our generation except maybe Joan Baez and Phil Ochs who wrote and sang to move people from point A to point B in the social struggles of the times.

What Dylan has also been about through it all has been a deep and abiding respect for the American songbook that he began to gather in his mind early on (look on YouTube to a clip from Don’t Look Back where he is up in some European hotel room with Joan Baez and Bob Neuwirth singing Hank Williams ballads or stuff from the Basement tapes where he runs the table on a few earlier genres). In the old days that was looking for roots, roots music from the mountains, the desolate oceans, the slave quarters, along the rivers and Dylan’s hero then was Woody Guthrie. But the American songbook is a “big tent” operation and the Tin Pan Alley that he broke from when he became his own songwriter is an important part of the overall tradition and now he has added his hero Frank Sinatra to his version of the songbook.

I may long for the old protest songs, the songs that stirred my blood to push on with the political struggles of the time like With God On Our Side which pushed me into the ranks of the Quakers, shakers, and little old ladies and men in tennis sneakers in the fight for nuclear disarmament, songs from the album pictured above, you know Blowin’ In The Wind which fit perfectly with the sense that something, something undefinable, something new as in the air in the early 1960s and The Times Are A Changin’ stuff like that, the roots music and not just Woody but Hank (including an incredible version of You Win Again, Tex-Mex (working later with George  Sahms of the Sir George Quintet, the Carters, the odd and unusual like the magic lyric play in Desolation Row, his cover of Charley Patton’s Highwater Rising or his cover of a song Lonnie Johnson made famous, Tomorrow Night, but Dylan has sought to entertain and there is room in his tent for the king of Tin Pan Alley (as Billie Holiday was the queen). Having heard Dylan live and in concert over the past several years with his grating lost voice (for me it was always about the lyrics not the voice although in looking at old tapes from the Newport Folk Festival on YouTube his voice was actually far better then than I would have given him credit for) I do wonder though how much production was needed to get the wrinkles out of that voice to sing as smoothly as the “Chairman of the boards,” to run the pauses and the hushed tones Frank knew how to do to keep his audience in his clutches. What goes around comes around.