Tuesday, September 13, 2016

******The Young Women With Long-Ironed Hair- With Joan Baez, Mimi Farina, And Judy Collins In Mind

******The Young Women With Long-Ironed Hair- With Joan Baez, Mimi Farina, And Judy Collins In Mind
 




The Young Women With Long-Ironed Hair- With Joan Baez, Mimi Farina, And Judy Collins In Mind


Laura Perkins was talking to her daughter, Emily Andrews one afternoon in April when she went to visit her and the grandkids up in Londonderry that is in New Hampshire, after returning from Florida, down Naples way. Laura had spent the winter there, a pilgrimage she had been doing the past five years or so since she, New England born and bred had tired, wearily tired of the winters provided by that section of the country and joined the “snow bird” trek south. Been doing more of the winter since she retired as a computer whizz free-lance consultant a couple of years ago. Emily the first born girl from the first of her three marriages who now had a couple of kids of her own although she has retained as is the “new style,” post-‘60s new style anyway, of women retaining their maiden name, or went hyphenated, kept Andrews in the bargain although Laura had given that name up minute one after the divorce which was messy and still a source of hatred when Emily’s father’s name is mentioned and thereafter kept her maiden name through the subsequent two marriages and divorces. During the conversation Laura commented to Emily, having not seen her for a while, on how long and straight she was keeping her hair these days which reminded her of the old days back in the romantic early 1960s when she used to hang around the Village in New York at the coffeehouses and folk clubs listening to lots of women folksingers like Carolyn Hester, Jean Redpath, Thelma Gordon, Joan Baez, Sissy Dubois and a bunch of others whose names she could just then not remember but whose hair was done in the same style including her own hair then.

Laura looked wistfully away just then touching her own now much shortened hair and colored a gentle brown with highlights, how much and for how long only her hairdresser knew and she, the well-tipped hair-dresser, was sworn to a secret Omerta oath even the CIA and Mafia could admire in the interest of not giving into age too much, especially once the computer whizz kids started showing up younger and younger either looking for work or as competitors. Meanwhile Emily explained how she came to let her hair grow longer and straighter (and her own efforts to keep it straighter) against all good reason what with two kids, a part-time accounting job and six thousand other young motherhood things demanded of her that would dictate that one needed a hair-do that one could just run a comb through, run through quickly.       

“Ma, you know how when you get all misty-eyed for your lost youth as you call it you are always talking about the old folk days, about the days in the Village and later in Harvard Square after you moved up here to go to graduate school at BU, minus Dad’s part in that time which I know you don’t like to talk about for obvious reasons. You also know, and we damn made it plain enough although you two never took it seriously, back when we were kids all of us, Melinda and Peter too, hated the very sound of folk music, stuff that sounded like something out of the Middle Ages and would run to our rooms when you guys played the stuff in you constant nostalgia moments. [That Middle Ages heritage, some of it, at least the rudiments, actually was on the mark if you look at the genesis of say half of the Child ballads which a folk enthusiast by that name in the 1850s over on Brattle Street in Cambridge collected, a number of ballads which ironically got picked up by the likes of Joan Baez in the late 1950s and played at the coffeehouses like the Club 47 and Café Nana just down from that Brahmin haven street. Or if you look to the more modern musicologists like the Seegers and Lomaxes who went down South, down Appalachia way, looking for roots music you will find some forbears brought over from the old country, the British Isles, that can be traced back to those times without doing injury to the truth.]

“Well one day I was in Whole Foods and I hear this song over their PA system or whatever they call it, you know those CDs they play to get you through the hard-ass shopping you need to do to keep the renegade kids from starvation’s door. The song seemed slightly familiar, folkie familiar, so I asked at the customer service desk who was singing the song and its name which I couldn’t quite remember. Of course the young clerk knew from nothing but a grey-haired guy, an old Cambridge radical type, a professor-type now that I think about what he looked like probably teaching English Lit, a guy you see in droves when you are in Harvard Square these days doddering along looking down at the ground like they have been doing for fifty years, standing in the same line as me, probably to return something that he bought by mistake and his wife probably ran his ass ragged until he returned the damn thing and got what she wanted, said it was Judy Collins doing Both Sides Now.  

That information from the professor, and that tune stuck in my head, got me thinking about checking out the song on YouTube which I did after I got home, unpacked the groceries, unpacked the kids and gave them their lunches. The version I caught was one of her on a Pete Seeger’s Rainbow Quest series from the 1960s in black and white that was on television back then which I am sure you and Dad knew about and she had this great looking long straight hair. I was envious. Then I kind of got the bug, wanted to check out some other folkie women whose names I know by heart, thank you, and noticed that Joan Baez in one clip taken at the Newport Folk Festival along with Bob Dylan singing With God On Our Side, God-awful if you remember me saying that every time you put it on the record-player, had even longer and straighter hair than Judy Collins.

“There she was all young, beautiful and dark-skinned Spanish exotic, something out of a Cervantes dream with that great hair. So I let mine grow and unlike what I heard Joan Baez, and about six zillion other young women did, including I think you, to keep it straight using an iron I went to Delores over at Flip Cuts in the mall and she does this thing to it every couple of months. And no I don’t want you to give me your folk albums, as valuable as they are, and as likely as I am to get them as family heirlooms when as you say you pass to the great beyond, please, to complete the picture because the stuff still sounds like it was from the Middle Ages although Dylan sounded better then than I remember, better than that croaking voice he has now that I heard you play one time on your car radio when we were heading up to Maine with you to go to Kittery to get the kids some back to school clothes.”        

Laura laughed a little at that remark as Emily went out the door to do some inevitable pressing shopping. After dutifully playing with Nick and Nana for a couple of hours while Emily went to get some chores done at the mall sans the kids who really are a drag on those kinds of tasks and after having stayed for supper when Sean got home from work she headed to her own home down in Cambridge (a condo really shared with her partner, Sam Lowell, whom she knew in college, lost track of and then reunited with after many years and three husbands at a college class reunion).

When she got home Sam, making her chuckle about what Emily said about that guy in the line at Whole Foods looked like and tarring Sam with that same brush, working on some paper of his, something about once again saving the world from the endless wars of the American government (other governments too but since as he said, quoting “Che” Guevara, always Che, about living in the heart of the beast the American government), the climate, nuclear disarmament, social inequality at home and in the world, or the plight of forgotten political prisoners, which was his holy mantra these days now that he was semi-retired from his law practice was waiting, waiting to hear the latest Nick and Nana stories instead she told him Emily’s story. Then they started talking about those old days in the 1960s when both she and he (he in Harvard Square having grown up in Carver about thirty miles south of Boston and her in the hotbed Village growing up in Manhattan and later at NYU where they went to school as undergraduates) imbibed in that now historic folk minute which promised, along with a few other things, to change the world a bit.

Laura, as Sam was talking, walked to a closet and brought out a black and white photograph from some folk festival in 1963 which featured Joan Baez, whom the clueless media always looking for a single hook to hang an idea on dubbed her the “queen of folk (and Dylan the king),” her sister Mimi Farina, who had married Richard Farina, the folk-singer/song-writer most poignantly Birmingham Sunday later killed in a motorcycle crash and Judy Collins on stage at the same time. All three competing with each other for the long straight hair championship. Here’s part of what was said about the picture that night, here’s how Laura put it:    

“Funny how trends get started, how one person, or a few start something and it seems like the whole world follows, or the part of the world that hears about the new dispensation anyway, the part you want to connect with. Remember Sam how we all called folk the “new dispensation” for our generation which had begun back in the late 1950s, early 1960s, slightly before our times when we caught up with it in college in 1964. So maybe it started in reaction to the trend when older guys started to lock-step in gray flannel suits. That funny Mad Men, retro-cool today look, which is okay if you pay attention to who was watching the show. In the days before Jack and Bobby Kennedy put the whammy on that fashion and broke many a haberdasher’s heart topped off by not wearing a soft felt hat like Uncle Ike and the older guys.”

“Funny too it would be deep into the 1960s before open-necks and colors other than white for shirts could be worked in but by then a lot of us were strictly denims and flannel shirts or some such non-suit or dress combination. Remember even earlier when the hula-hoop fad went crazy when one kid goofing off threw a hard plastic circle thing around his or her waist and every kid from Portland, Maine to Portland, Oregon had to have one, to be tossed aside in some dank corner of the garage after a few weeks when everybody got into yo-yos or Davey Crockett coonskin caps. Or maybe, and this might be closer to the herd instinct truth, it was after Elvis exploded onto the scene and every guy from twelve to two hundred in the world had to, whether they looked right with it or not, wear their sideburns just a little longer, even if they were kind of wispy and girls laughed at you for trying to out-king the “king” who they were waiting for not you. I know I did with Jasper James King who tried like hell to imitate Elvis and I just stepped on his toes all dance when he asked me to dance with him on It’s Alright, Mama.”  

“But maybe it was, and this is a truth which we can testify to when some girls, probably college girls like me, now called young women but then still girls no matter how old except mothers or grandmothers, having seen Joan Baez on the cover of Time (or perhaps her sister Mimi on some Mimi and Richard Farina folk album cover)got out the ironing board at home or in her dorm and tried to iron their own hair whatever condition it was in, curly, twisty, or flippy like mine, whatever  don’t hold me to all the different hairstyles to long and straight strands. Surely as strong as the folk minute was just then say 1962, 63, 64, they did not see the photo of Joan on some grainy Arise and Sing folk magazine cover, the folk scene was too young and small back in the early days to cause such a sea-change.”

 Sam piped up and after giving the photograph a closer look said, “Looking at that photograph you just pulled out of the closet now, culled I think from a calendar put out by the New England Folk Archive Society, made me think back to the time when I believe that I would not go out with a girl (young woman, okay) if she did not have the appropriate “hair,” in other words no bee-hive or flip thing that was the high school rage among the not folk set, actually the rage among the social butterfly, cheerleader, motorcycle mama cliques. Which may now explain why I had so few dates in high school and none from Carver High. But no question you could almost smell the singed hair at times, and every guy I knew liked the style, liked the style if they liked Joan Baez, maybe had some dreamy sexual desire thing about hopping in the hay, and that was that.”                   

“My old friend Bart Webber, a guy I met out in San Francisco  when I went out West with my old friend  Josh Breslin in our hitchhike days with whom if you remember I re-connected with via the “magic” of the Internet a few years ago, told me a funny story when we met at the Sunnyville Grille in Boston one time about our friend Julie Peters who shared our love of folk music back then (and later too as we joined a few others in the folk aficionado world after the heyday of the folk minute got lost in the storm of the British Beatles/Stones  invasion).”

“He had first met her in Harvard Square one night at the Café Blanc when the place had their weekly folk night (before every night was folk night when Eric Von Schmidt put the place on the map by writing Joshua Gone Barbados which he sang and which Tom Rush went big with) and they had a coffee together. That night she had her hair kind of, oh he didn’t know what they called it but he thought something like beehive or flip or something which highlighted and enhanced her long face. Bart thought she looked fine. Bart, like myself, was not then hip to the long straight hair thing and so he kind of let it pass without any comment.”

“Then one night a few weeks later after they had had a couple of dates she startled him when he picked her up at her dorm at Boston University to go over the Club Blue in the Square to see Dave Van Ronk hold forth in his folk historian gravelly-voiced way. She met him at the door with the mandatory straight hair although it was not much longer than when he first met her which he said frankly made her face even longer. When Bart asked her why the change Julie declared that she could not possibly go to Harvard Square looking like somebody from some suburban high school not after seeing her idol Joan Baez (and later Judy Collins too) with that great long hair which seemed very exotic, very Spanish.”

“Of course he compounded his troubles by making the serious mistake of asking if she had her hair done at the beauty parlor or something and she looked at him with burning hate eyes since no self-respecting folkie college girl would go to such a place where her mother would go. So she joined the crowd, Bart got used to it and after a while she did begin to look like a folkie girl, and started wearing the inevitable peasant blouses instead of those cashmere sweaters or starched Catholic school shirt things she used to wear.”     

“By the way Laura let’s be clear on that Julie thing with Bart back in the early 1960s since his Emma goes crazy every time anybody, me, you, Bart, Frankie Riley, Jack Callahan mentions any girl that Bart might have even looked at in those days. Yeah, even after almost forty years of marriage so keep this between us. She and Bart went “Dutch treat” to see Dave Van Ronk at the Club Blue. They were thus by definition not on a heavy date, neither had been intrigued by the other enough to be more than very good friends after the first few dates but folk music was their bond. Just friends despite persistent Julie BU dorm roommate rumors what with Bart hanging around all the time listening to her albums on the record player they had never been lovers.

“Many years later she mentioned that Club Blue night to me since I had gone with them with my date, Joyell Danforth, as we waited to see Pete Seeger and Arlo Guthrie with us to see if I remembered Van Ronk’s performance and while I thought I remembered I was not sure.

I asked Julie, “Was that the night he played that haunting version of Fair and Tender Ladies with Eric Von Schmidt backing him up on the banjo?” Julie had replied yes and that she too had never forgotten that song and how the house which usually had a certain amount of chatter going on even when someone was performing had been dead silent once he started singing.”

As for the long-ironed haired women in the photograph their work in that folk minute and later speaks for itself. Joan Baez worked the Bob Dylan anointed “king and queen” of the folkies routine for a while for the time the folk minute lasted. Mimi (now passed on) teamed up with her husband, Richard Farina, who as mentioned before was tragically killed in a motorcycle crash in the mid-1960s, to write and sing some of the most haunting ballads of those new folk times (think Pack Up Your Sorrows). Julie Collins, now coiffured like that mother Julie was beauty parlor running away from and that is okay, still produces beautiful sounds on her concert tours. But everyone should remember, every woman from that time anyway, should remember that burnt hair, and other sorrows, and know exactly who to blame. Yeah, we have the photo as proof.           

UFPJ URGENT Message - 9/14 Briefing Call: "The Many Wars of Syria" with Phyllis Bennis


UFPJ URGENT Message - 9/14 Briefing Call: "The Many Wars of Syria" with Phyllis Bennis

Please join us for:
"The Many Wars of Syria"  A Briefing Call with Phyllis Bennis

Wednesday, Sept. 14th

9:00pm Eastern, 8:00pm Central, 7:00pm Mountain, 6:00pm Pacific

Call in #: 605-562-3140

PIN: 952870#


Let's start out the fall with a new commitment to follow more closely the carnage in Syria. Is it a civil war? Is it a proxy war between the nuclear powers ? Is it also a proxy war between Middle Eastern governments? Can ISIS be reined in? Should Assad go? Or stay? What is the USA doing as an actor in the situation? We as anti-war activists should be constantly questioning that. What about congressional moves to demand a new AUMF? Is that wise?

What would diplomacy look like in such a complex set of wars? What are solutions that the US Peace Movement could be pushing? For one, we should be extending the good efforts against arms sales to Saudi Arabia -- always promoting the goal of a Weapons-of-Mass-Destruction Free Zone in the Middle East (and why stop there?).
We in the Peace Movement have a deep belief that the American invasion of Iraq started this whole change of events. Syrian Immigrants (as well as those from North Africa) are changing the population map of both the Middle East and Europe. Why is the US taking in so few of those who are fleeing? What is our responsibility as advocates for peace to those who flee from war and violence?
What do the American people know of all this? Once again our mass media has let us all down. What kind of educational campaign can we launch to quicken the sensibilities of the good folk of the United States?
What about the belief in America as a moral force in the world? So many opportunities for America to shine get lost as our treasure goes to "solving" problems with military might. Instead of the greed and corruption fomented by corporations -- particularly in the military-industrial area -- American ingenuity and trillion dollar investment could dig in with creative answers to climate change. We could lead the world in public education that serves every child in our very diverse democracy. The biggest challenge of all is to address the burgeoning gaps between rich and poor both in this country and across the globe because until that changes, perpetual wars continue. Let's keep dreaming of a peaceful world and acting to make it so.
Click here to RSVP for Wednesday's call: https://actionnetwork.org/events/the-many-wars-of-syria-with-phyllis-bennis
Sponsors: UFPJ, PDA, Code Pink
Moderator: Jackie Cabasso, UFPJ

Phyllis Bennis is a Fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies, where she directs the New Internationalism project working to change US policy in the broader Middle East. She was a co-founder of both the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and United for Peace and Justice coalitions, and continues work with both the US and global anti-war movements. Her most recent books include Understanding the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict, and Understanding ISIS & the New Global War on Terror: A Primer.  
Help us continue to do this critical work and more-- make a donation to UFPJ today.
Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address or to stop receiving emails from United for Peace & Justice, please click here.

 
Upcoming Events: 
Newsletter: 

*For The Folkies From Muskogee And Elsewhere- The Bob Feldman Music Blog On "My Space"-C.Wright Mills' Take on Celebrities

Markin comment:

This is great stuff for any music aficionado, especially of folk, social protest, and roots music. I am going to be "stealing" entries off of this site periodically but you should be checking it out yourselves. Kudos, Bob Feldman.

*********

C.Wright Mills' Take on Celebrities--Part 1
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities


In his 1956 book, "The Power Elite," a sociologist named C. Wright Mills wrote the following in reference to the role that Celebrities apparently play in U.S. society:

"...With the elaboration of the national means of mass communication, the professional celebrities of the entertainment world have come fully and continuously into the national view. As personalities of national glamour, they are at the focal point of all the means of entertainment and publicity...The institutional elite must now compete with and borrow prestige from these professionals in the world of the celebrity.

"But what are the celebrities? The celebrities are The Names that need no further identification. Those who know them so far exceed those of whom they know as to require no exact computation. Wherever the celebrities go, they are recognized, and moreover, recognized with some excitement and awe. Whatever they do has publicity value. More or less continuously, over a period of time, they are the material for the media of communication and entertainment. And, when that time ends--as it must--and the celebrity still lives--as he may--from time to time it may be asked, "Remember him?" That is what celebrity means..."


Read more: http://www.myspace.com/bobafeldman68music/blog?page=9#ixzz0zMP3AO00

******

C.Wright Mills's Take On Celebrities--Part 2
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
In his 1956 book,"The Power Elite," C.Wright Mills wrote the following about the role that Celebrities apparently play in U.S. Society:

"The professional celebrity, male and female, is the crowning result of the star system of a society that makes a fetish of competition. In America, this system is carried to the point where a man who can knock a small white ball into a series of holes in the ground with more efficiency and skill than anyone else thereby gains social access to the President of the United States. It is carried to the point where a chattering radio and television entertainer becomes the hunting chum of leading industrial executives, cabinet members, and the higher military. It does not seem to matter what the man is the very best at; so long as he has won out in competition over all others, he is celebrated. Then, a second feature of the star system begins to work: all the stars of any other sphere of endeavor or position are drawn toward the new star and he toward them. The success, the champion, accordingly, is one who mingles freely with other champions to populate the world of the celebrity..."

******

C.Wright Mills' Take On Celebrities--Part 3
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities

In his 1956 book, "The Power Elite," New Left sociologist C.Wright Mills indicated the role that Celebrities apparently play in U.S. society:

"This world [of Celebrities] is at once the pinnacle of the prestige system and a big-scale business. As a business, the networks of mass communication, publicity, and entertainment are not only the means whereby celebrities are celebrated; they also select and create celebrities for a profit. One type of celebrity, accordingly, is a professional at it, earning sizeable income not only from working in, but virtually living on, the mass media of communication and distraction.

"The movie stars and the Broadway actress, the crooners and the TV clowns, are celebrities because of what they do on and to these media. They are celebrated because they are displayed as celebrities. If they are not thus celebrated, in due time--often very short--they lose their jobs. In them, the panic for status has become a professional craving; their very image of self is dependent upon publicity, and they need increasing doses of it. Often they seem to have celebrity and nothing else. Rather than being celebrated because they occupy positions of prestige, they occupy positions of prestige because they are celebrated. The basis of the celebration--in a strange and intricate way--is at once personal and syntheetic: it is their Talent--which seems to mean their appearance value and their skill combined into what is known as A Personality. Their very importance makes them seem charming people, and they are celebrated all the time: they seem to live a sort of...high life, and others, by curiously watching them live it, celebrate them as well as their celebrated way of life..."

*For The Folkies From Muskogee And Elsewhere- The Bob Feldman Music Blog On "My Space"-Rosetta Reitz's 1980 Notes to "Women's Railroad Blues" Album

Markin comment:

This is great stuff for any music aficionado, especially of folk, social protest, and roots music. I am going to be "stealing" entries off of this site periodically but you should be checking it out yourselves. Kudos, Bob Feldman.

***********

Rosetta Reitz's 1980 Notes to "Women's Railroad Blues" Album: Part 1
Current mood: contemplative
Category: Music


In liner notes to the 1980 Rosetta Records vinyl album, "Sorry But I Can't Take You: Women's Railroad Blues," "Blues Women 1920 to 1950" author Rosetta Reitz wrote the following:

""Goin to Chicago, sorry but I can't take you" is a classic blues line written and made famous by the late Jimmy Rushing, one of the country's best known blues shouters. It mirrored the truth for black women in the South; the man went north and the woman remained behind. The song was such a success that Rushing wrote another similar blues which could also have served for the title of this album, "Bye Bye Baby."

"Travel and trains have played an important role in the evolution of the blues song. Many songs begin with the sound of steel wheels grinding or the huffing and puffing of steam locomotives or use clanging train bells and whistles. It is easy to understand why the train figured so prominently: it meant escape, freedom, hope, excitement, and new worlds to conquer. The train also meant a way away from the Jim Crow atmosphere of water fountains with signs proclaiming "Whites Only" and all that implied: exploitation, disenfranchisement, physical danger.

""Goin to Chicago" meant going to the "promised land," especially in the 1920's when it was the railroad crossing and the hog-butcher of the world. It meant a chance at a job. The meat-packing industry hired blacks, though the jobs were the least skilled ones. Chicago was North and North meant Detroit too, where the automotive industry hired Negroes, as did Pennsylvania's steel industry...Factory jobs, no matter how menial, carried more dignity than did working in the fields or in lumber or pine camps or on the levees.

"Not that there wasn't also segregation in the North, but it was of a different variety. There was segregation on the way to the North too, for blacks couldn't board a train unless it carried a car for "coloreds."

"The history of all America, particularly black people after the Civil War, has been intertwined with the railroad. The romance and excitement of the train is extolled in books about the blues and jazz as a positive symbol of freedom. It was. But for men only--not for women. These books are written as though half the population didn't exist; nowhere is it mentioned how these forces affected black women..."

***
Rosetta Reitz's 1980 Notes to "Women's Railroad Blues" Album: Part 2
Current mood: contemplative
Category: Music
In liner notes to the 1980 Rosetta Records vinyl album, "Sorry But I Can't Take You: Women's Railroad Blues," "Blues Women 1920 to 1950" author Rosetta Reitz wrote the following:


"To the women, the train was an unslayable monster, a demon who swallowed up their men, men who usually didn't come back and seldom sent for them. "Sorry but I can't take you." The magic that the sound and movement of the train held for men was a different one filled with terror and envy---for women.

"The factory jobs up North didn't exist for women; they were for men only. Jobs as domestics were not available either because Irish women had been filling them since their mass immigration in the nineteenth century because of the potato famine. A small number of black women worked as domestics but there were not enough jobs to pull them out of the South. There is an historic imperative to correct the belief that the response to the trian by black women in the South was the same as the one for men.

"The male blues songs of the period spell it out:

""I'm going up North, baby, I can't carry you.
""Ain't nothin in that cold country, a sweet gal can do."

These lines were written by Cow Cow Davenport in 1929, and "Jim Crow Blues," the tune they came from, was a big seller for Paramount, in part because of its driving boogie-woogie piano style, but also because of its sentiments..."

****

Rosetta Reitz 1980 Notes to Women's Railroad Blues Album: Conclusion
Current mood: contemplative
Category: Music
In liner notes to the 1980 Rosetta Records vinyl album, "Sorry But I Can't Take You: Women's Railroad Blues," "Blues Women 1920 to 1950" author Rosetta Reitz wrote the following:

"The train as a positive metaphor goes back as far as the earliest trains. It was a "natural"; that is why the symbolic history is so old. The Underground Railroad meant escape more than it meaant riding on a train. The railroad itself created jobs too and those jobs carried more respect and wages than did agricultural ones. But these jobs did not include women.

"In the vast blues literature, the sadness and sorrow of being abandoned, being left with the "Empty Bed Blues," is the result of the mobility of men in that culture. The freight train was everyman's escape, everyman's panacea. That is why there was always a shortage of men. He could hop a freight train and ride. She could not. This was a significant difference in their lives...

"...The women's lament became personified by Trixie Smith who recorded "Freight Train Blues" in May 1924 for the Paramount "race" label. It was a very big seller, both in black music stores and through mail order; nonetheless it has been virtually ignored in the blues histories...

"Trixie's 1924 version was such a big moneymaker for Paramount that other record companies hastened to cut it too. In September, Columbia had Clara Smith, a big star then, billed as the World's Champion Moaner, in the recording studio and Vocalion had Lena Henry cut it and Josie Miles acompanied by her Choo Choo Jazzers recorded it for Ajax...

"It is important to understand that the women singing these songs at this time were more important than their accompanists. The classic blues singers were looked upon by their public as heroes who made it; as high priestesses who were telling the truth which the listener could identify with in the here and now, not after death as in church songs. In the more than fifty years from the time these blues were originally recorded a historical distortion has taken place because most of the people involved in writing about, collecting, cataloguing and reissuing records have been men who have been more interested in the instrumentalists than in the female singers...


Read more: http://www.myspace.com/bobafeldman68music/blog?page=7#ixzz0zMO9eVMA

*For The Folkies From Muskogee And Elsewhere- The Bob Feldman Music Blog On "My Space"-From The Weavers at Carnegie Hall Liner Notes In 1950s

Markin comment:

This is great stuff for any music aficionado, especially of folk, social protest, and roots music. I am going to be "stealing" entries off of this site periodically but you should be checking it out yourselves. Kudos, Bob Feldman.

************

From The Weavers at Carnegie Hall Liner Notes In 1950s--Part 1
Current mood: nostalgic
Category: Music


"Every once in a while a performer or group of performers comes along and revitalizes the popular music industry. Sometimes it's done by a unique personality, or by unusual repertory, or by creating a fresh style. When artists combine all of these, they may even have the rare privilege of changing the musical taste of a nation. The Weavers have that honor. Since that day in 1950 when "Good Night Irene"...hit the record racks...the music world has been a different kind of place to be, perhaps a more pleasant one.

"The Weavers set the tin-pans clanging in that alley with a reverberation which hasn't yet died down. They sent the songsmiths scurrying about in the folk music archives, doing a little research looking for "that hit." The second-hand music dealers, hung a sold-out sign on their dusty bins of folk songs and ballads. A lot of young people took up the guitar and banjo.

"Among the many knotty problems which The Weavers raised was that of classification. It is said that Billboard and Variety held a joint conference on the subject, where learned musicological dissertations were read bearing such titles as, "Are The Weavers Rhythm and Blues or Country and Western?..."

(from the liner notes of Vanguard's "The Weavers at Carnegie Hall" vinyl album of 1950s)


Read more: http://www.myspace.com/bobafeldman68music/blog?page=6#ixzz0zMMHvL3x

From The Weavers at Carnegie Hall Liner Notes In 1950s--Part 2
Current mood: contemplative
Category: Music
"Talking about folk music is a large order. Woody Guthrie said it: "Folksongs and ballads are a big subject; just as old and just as young, just as big to talk about as the whole humanly race around our planet here." The Weavers came on the scene when, with few exceptions, folk music seemed to have become a specialized, even esoteric art, and some theorists were lamenting that it was "dying," that it was being driven into the ground by urban culture, that radio, television and manufactured popular songs were stifling its capacity for growth. The Weavers proved them wrong, and helped to replant folk music not merely in the countryside but in the urban centers as well.

"This could only have been done, of course, through a new approach. And the Weavers hit upon theirs in a way that could almost be called accidental; that is, working out what seemed to be "right" for themselves, rather than entertaining visions of starting a trend. Their unique style stems from a bold disregard of the "purist" approach. It may be described as a rejection of surface "authenticity" to arrive at a deeper authenticity. For the essential and living quality of folk music is that it is never "fixed" in a scholar's treatise or on a phonograph record; it is always growing and changing. It is at once the voice of the past and the vigorous voice of the present. It adapts itself to any voice or instrument. It can not only weather, but can profit from occasional changes of text, the addition of new verses, an inspired rhythmic alteration. And that is actually the way in which new folk songs have traditionally grown out of old ones. Always, to folk singers, a "new song" meant new words set to an old melody, and if in the process a new variant or curve of melody appeared, that seemed so natural a process that they hardly paid it any mind.."

From liner notes to Vanguard's "The Weavers at Carnegie Hall" vinyl album of the 1950s

Read more: http://www.myspace.com/bobafeldman68music/blog?page=6#ixzz0zMMN7ubK

Monday, September 12, 2016

Evicted-Poverty and Profit in the American City-A Book Review by Cliff Edwards and Simone Hayes

Workers Vanguard No. 1094
26 August 2016
 
Evicted-Poverty and Profit in the American City-A Book Review by Cliff Edwards and Simone Hayes

Harvard sociologist Matthew Desmond’s 2016 book Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City examines the impact on the poor of rising housing costs and declining/stagnating incomes in the aftermath of the 2008 economic crash. Many tenants now pay more than 50 percent of their incomes in rent—over 70 percent with the soaring cost of utilities included—challenging their ability to survive on a daily basis. The result: a plague of evictions. Desmond’s book documents the lives of eight individuals and their families—both black and white—in the process of eviction from their homes. There are, as well, sketches of a landlord or two, seemingly included in the interest of “fairness” to those who find themselves compelled to throw their tenants out in order to turn a profit—and landlords are an integral component of Desmond’s purported solution to the housing crisis.
Evicted has been greeted with one rave review after another from critics across the spectrum of bourgeois opinion, from the left-liberal Guardian to the plutocratic Wall Street Journal. In a review in the New York Times (22 February), Jennifer Senior described the book as “unignorable,” concluding that “it will no longer be possible to have a serious discussion about poverty without having a serious discussion about housing.” The fact that the poor, especially the black and Hispanic residents of America’s ghettos and barrios, live in dismal circumstances and are often thrown into the streets is hardly a revelation—except, evidently, to the excited reviewers. Nonetheless, when Desmond details the struggles of those who have only a few bucks left after their rent is paid, he is trenchant and compelling, perhaps informed by his parents’ eviction while he was in college.
An American City
Desmond conducted his research in Milwaukee, which he notes is “a fairly typical midsize metropolitan area,” much like Minneapolis, Baltimore, Cincinnati and many others. In Milwaukee, one in fourteen renters is evicted by court order each year. There are almost as many “informal” evictions—where your stuff is dragged out to the curb without legal authorization. One in five black female renters in Milwaukee reports being evicted as an adult, triple the rate for white women. Court records show that women living in black areas of Milwaukee are twice as likely to be evicted as their male neighbors. “If incarceration had come to define the lives of men from impoverished black neighborhoods, eviction was shaping the lives of women,” Desmond writes, concluding: “Poor black men were locked up. Poor black women were locked out.”
Milwaukee is one of many cities in racist America that are described as the country’s most segregated. During the civil rights era, hundreds of marches for integration were turned back by racist mobs and cop terror. An influx of immigration in the 1970s resulted in a segregated Latino enclave. To this day, “separate and unequal” prevails in the city. Racist discrimination, cop harassment, poverty and unemployment trap black tenants in the worst slums of Milwaukee’s North Side. Black tenants—and households with children—are most likely to have to endure broken windows and appliances; rats, roaches and bedbugs; lack of heat and failing plumbing. The slums also return high rates of profit for landlords—dilapidated property is cheap and chronically poor tenants have little choice but to accept crippling rent and horrific living conditions.
Desmond’s research includes a run-down white trailer park in Milwaukee’s far South Side. There he documented pervasive racial prejudice that obscured how much the white trailer park residents had in common with the black slum dwellers. Anti-black racism is a key ideological prop of American capitalism. Far from bestowing some form of privilege on white poor and working people, racism hampers social struggle and divides the working class, allowing the capitalist exploiters to drive down living conditions across the board.
The Making of a Crisis
With rents nationally projected to rise another 8 percent this year, the living conditions of the working poor and the unemployed are likely to shift from the excruciating to the unendurable. Democratic president Bill Clinton’s destruction of “welfare as we know it” in the 1990s means that today benefits barely cover rent for those who can even get welfare. The workfare program Clinton applied to the whole country was pioneered in Milwaukee, where it drove 22,000 desperate families off the welfare rolls. Since the 1980s, when many public housing projects began to be razed, such assistance for renters as was available from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has been in decline.
In 1992, HUD instituted a demolition program under the Orwellian acronym of HOPE VI that destroyed 270,000 units of public housing—a 19 percent decrease in public housing stock. At the same time, the federal government increased the use of housing vouchers. Vouchers—government payments to private landlords—became the largest housing subsidy program. Supposedly designed to cap the rent payments of qualifying recipients at 30 percent of their income, vouchers are available only for the poorest of the poor; the average income of voucher recipients is $12,000 to $14,000 a year. Only two million renters—a quarter of those supposedly eligible for such assistance—actually receive it. With no requirement for private landlords to accept housing vouchers, the program has reinforced residential segregation. The number of people receiving rent voucher assistance has frozen, while the number in need of assistance has gone up and up.
Desmond is well aware of this history. He characterizes the current state of affairs as “one of the worst affordable housing crises in generations.” Nevertheless, he projects the sunniest optimism regarding prospects for the future: “The good news is that much has already been accomplished. America has made impressive strides over the years when it comes to housing.” Well, not quite. In 1960, American renters paid on average 19 percent of their yearly income toward housing costs. Today that figure is 30 percent.
Liberal Delusions
Desmond believes there is a simple solution to the housing crisis under capitalism. He advocates that the government provide housing vouchers to all low-income families to prevent them from paying a dime more than 30 percent of their incomes for rent. Under his scheme, landlords would be enjoined from raising rents but be guaranteed a “modest” profit, adjusted, of course, for inflation. In exchange for mandatory participation in the program and a ban on discriminatory practices, landlords would be spared a too stringent enforcement of building codes.
Further, Desmond sees guaranteed housing as a panacea for all of America’s social ills. A home, in his mind, becomes almost a heaven on earth: “The home is the center of life. It is a refuge from the grind of work, the pressure of school, and the menace of the streets...the wellspring of personhood.” One is almost embarrassed to remind Desmond that there are elderly people who dine on pet food and die of heatstroke in their own homes.
Irrespective of his layering of schmaltz, Desmond’s recommendations for reform border on the preposterous. The housing crisis is a product of a society organized on the basis of private profit, and of the ebbs and flows of employment and unemployment that are endemic to the capitalist system. Friedrich Engels vividly described that process in his 1872 pamphlet The Housing Question:
“In reality the bourgeoisie has only one method of settling the housing question after its fashion—that is to say, of settling it in such a way that the solution continually poses the question anew.... No matter how different the reasons may be, the result is everywhere the same: the most scandalous alleys and lanes disappear to the accompaniment of lavish self-glorification by the bourgeoisie on account of this tremendous success, but—they appear again at once somewhere else.... The same economic necessity which produced them in the first place produces them in the next place also.”
The reality is that the capitalist system cannot guarantee its wage slaves a decent living—much less those it has tossed on the scrap heap of permanent unemployment.
For decades, the capitalist order has aggressively pursued an all-sided assault on the living standards of working and poor people. In fact, the only significant reforms providing affordable housing for working people have been ceded by the capitalist rulers in response to the prospect of social upheaval. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, the legions of the unemployed were often organized (usually by communists) into unemployed councils that fought on behalf of the destitute. With close ties to the working class and broad popular support, these councils were very successful in stopping evictions of the unemployed as well as in organizing rent strikes. During the Great Rent Strike of 1932 in New York, tenants in several buildings withheld their rent and demanded reductions in prices and a moratorium on evictions. Landlords fired back with massive evictions, but protesters stopped the evictions in hand-to-hand combat with police.
The 1937 Housing Act, which initiated the construction of public housing units throughout the country, was passed during the tumultuous wave of class struggle that established the CIO industrial unions. (The landlord associations at that time lobbied for a voucher system instead.) Similarly, it was the social upheavals of the civil rights movement that led to a series of Fair Housing Acts and a significant expansion of HUD’s voucher program.
Expropriate the Expropriators!
Today public housing has been eviscerated. The voucher system is stagnating and, in real terms, shrinking, notwithstanding the growing inability of masses of people to afford housing. The fight for quality housing—and for jobs—is no less necessary today than it was in the 1930s. But the fighting spirit of the labor movement has been sapped by a trade-union bureaucracy committed to maintaining the bosses’ profits in the face of this country’s social decay. As the depredations of capitalism impel the working class to struggle, a new, fighting leadership in the unions must be forged, committed to organizing the unorganized. Building such a leadership goes hand in hand with constructing a revolutionary workers party that will act as the tribune of the oppressed and will stop at nothing less than abolishing capitalism. Those who labor must rule!
Labor militancy can forestall and, to some extent, reverse the excesses of capitalist exploitation. But without the overthrow of bourgeois class rule, when the class battles subside, the inexorable drive to increase profits will reassert itself, producing growing misery for the working masses at one pole and, at the other, obscene wealth for the owners of the means of production. As Engels wrote, “The solution lies in the abolition of the capitalist mode of production and the appropriation of all the means of subsistence and instruments of labour by the working class itself.”
Desmond’s book is representative of the same school of thought as Thomas Piketty’s much-ballyhooed Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014). These friendly critics of capitalism try to convince those opposed to the profit system’s savageries that drastic measures (e.g., revolution) are unnecessary. Their method is to identify and analyze a glaring injustice and then put forward a solution that is purportedly so modest and reasonable that it will win over the powers that be. For Piketty, the problem is the gargantuan inequality of wealth between the rulers and the ruled, and his solution is a planet-wide tax on the wealthy (see “Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” WV Nos. 1053 and 1054, 3 and 17 October 2014). Desmond’s vouchers-for-all proposal is, perhaps, a shade less delusional than Piketty’s, but it is no more likely to be implemented by the rulers of the capitalist order.
No application of persuasion or pressure will suffice to eradicate the diseases caused by the profit system. As Engels put it, “The housing shortage is no accident; it is a necessary institution and can be abolished...only if the whole social order from which it springs is fundamentally refashioned.” A victorious working-class revolution would solve the housing crisis almost instantaneously by expropriating the property of the bourgeoisie, from the financiers and rentiers to the real estate barons. The vacant suites of all the mansions and luxury high-rise apartments as well as the almost 19 million homes in this country that sit vacant would be seized to provide housing for all who require it, including the inhabitants of the slums and the 3.5 million people who are now homeless.
At the same time, the proletarian regime would undertake an enormous program to construct integrated residential communities designed to facilitate free and equal social relationships. Quality education and access to culture, entertainment and athletics will allow the fullest development of all, while facilities and social services will be vastly expanded to free women from the drudgery of housework and the burdens of child-rearing. Initial steps toward building such communities were taken in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. The early Soviet regime, insofar as it was able to amid poverty, backwardness and the massive destruction caused by the Civil War, established communal institutions, such as kitchens and laundries, specifically aimed at liberating women from the stultifying slavery of housework. The Bolshevik vision was that the international proletarian revolution would lay the basis for ending the domination of man by man and open the way for the full flowering of the human species. In comparison, the elaborate schemes of the would-be reformers of the imperialist order promise little and obtain nothing that can endure the brutalities of the decaying capitalist system.

*****When The Tin Can Bended…. In The Time Of The Late Folk-Singer Dave Van Ronk’s Time

*****When The Tin Can Bended…. In The Time Of The Late Folk-Singer Dave Van Ronk’s Time
 
 
 
From The Pen Of Bart Webber
 

Sometimes Sam Lowell and his “friend” (really “sweetie,” long time sweetie, paramour, significant other, consort or whatever passes for the socially acceptable or Census Bureau bureaucratic “speak” way to name somebody who is one’s soul-mate, his preferred term) Laura Perkins whose relationship to Sam was just described in parenthesis, and righteously so, liked to go to Crane’s Beach in Ipswich to either cool off in the late summer heat or in the fall before the New England weather lowers its hammer and the place gets a bit inaccessible. That later summer  heat escape valve is a result of the hard fact that July, when they really would like to go there to catch a few fresh sea breezes, is not a time to show up at the bleach white sands beach due to nasty blood-sucking green flies swarming and dive-bombing like some berserk renegade Air Force squadron lost on a spree who breed in the nearby swaying mephitic marshes.

The only “safe haven” then is to drive up the hill to the nearby robber-baron days etched Crane Castle to get away from the buggers, although on a stagnant wind day you might have a few vagrant followers, as the well-to-do have been doing since there were well-to-do and had the where-with-all to escape the summer heat and bugs at higher altitudes. By the way I assume that “castle” is capitalized when it part of a huge estate, the big ass estate of Crane, now a trust monument to the first Gilded Age, not today’s neo-Gilded Age, architectural proclivities of the rich, the guy whose company did, does all the plumbing fixture stuff on half the bathrooms in America including the various incantations of the mansion. 

Along the way, along the hour way to get to Ipswich from Cambridge Sam and Laura had developed a habit of making the time more easy passing by listening to various CDs, inevitably not listened to for a long time folk CDs, not listened to for so long that the plastic containers needed to be dusted off before being brought along, on the car CD player. And is their wont while listening to some CD to comment on this or that thing that some song brought to mind, or the significance of some song in their youth.  One of the things that had brought them together early on several years back was their mutual interest in the old 1960s folk minute which Sam, a little older and having grown up within thirty miles of Harvard Square, one the big folk centers of that period along with the Village and North Beach out in Frisco town, had imbibed deeply. Laura, growing up “in the sticks,” in farm country in upstate New York had gotten the breeze at second-hand through records, records bought at Cheapo Records and the eternal Sandy's on Massachusetts Avenue in Cambridge and a little the fading Cambridge folk scene when she had moved to Boston in the early 1970s to go to graduate school.     

One hot late August day they got into one such discussion about how they first developed an interest in folk music when Sam had said “sure everybody, everybody over the age of say fifty to be on the safe side, knows about Bob Dylan, maybe some a little younger too if some hip kids have browsed through their parents’ old vinyl record collections now safely ensconced in the attic although there are stirrings of retro-vinyl revival of late according a report he had heard on NPR. Some of that over 50 crowd and their young acolytes would also know about how Dylan, after serving something like an apprenticeship under the influence of Woody Guthrie in the late 1950s singing Woody’s songs imitating Woody's style something  fellow Woody acolytes like Ramblin’ Jack Elliot never quite got over moved on, got all hung up on high symbolism and obscure references. Funny guys like Jack actually made a nice workman-like career out of Woody covers, so their complaints seen rather hollow now. That over 50s crowd would also know Dylan became if not the voice of the Generation of ’68, their generation, which he probably did not seriously aspire in the final analysis, then the master troubadour of the age.

Sam continued along that line after Laura had said she was not sure about the connection and he said he meant, “troubadour in the medieval sense of bringing news to the people and entertaining them by song and poetry as well if not decked in some officially approved garb like back in those olden days where they worked under a king’s license if lucky, by their wit otherwise but the 'new wave' post-beatnik flannel shirt, work boots, and dungarees which connected you with the roots, the American folk roots down in the Piedmont, down in Appalachia, down in Mister James Crow’s Delta. So, yes, that story has been pretty well covered.”  

Laura said she knew all of that about the desperate search for roots although not that Ramblin’ Jack had been an acolyte of Woody’s but she wondered about others, some other folk performers who she listened to on WUMB on Saturday morning when some weeping willow DJ put forth about fifty old time rock and folk things a lot of which she had never heard of back in Mechanicsville outside of Albany where she grew up. Sam then started in again, “Of course that is hardly the end of the story since Dylan did not create that now hallowed folk minute of the early 1960s. He had been washed by it when he came to the East from Hibbing, Minnesota for God’s sake (via Dink’s at the University), came into the Village where there was a cauldron of talent trying to make folk the next big thing, the next big cultural thing for the young and restless of the post-World War II generations. For us. But also those in little oases like the Village where the disaffected could put up on stuff they couldn’t get in places like Mechanicsville or Carver where I grew up. People who I guess, since even I was too young to know about that red scare stuff except to you had to follow your teacher’s orders to put your head under your desk and hand over your head if the nuclear holocaust was coming, were frankly fed up with the cultural straightjacket of the red scare Cold War times and began seriously looking as hard at roots in all its manifestations as our parents, definitely mine, yours were just weird about stuff like that, right, were burying those same roots under a vanilla existential Americanization. How do you like that for pop sociology 101.”

“One of the talents who was already there when hick Dylan came a calling, lived there, came from around there was the late Dave Van Ronk who as you know we had heard several times in person, although unfortunately when his health and well-being were declining not when he was a young politico and hell-raising folk aspirant. You know he also, deservedly, fancied himself a folk historian as well as musician.”    

“Here’s the funny thing, Laura, that former role is important because we all know that behind the “king” is the “fixer man,” the guy who knows what is what, the guy who tells one and all what the roots of the matter were like some mighty mystic (although in those days when he fancied himself a socialist that mystic part was played down). Dave Van Ronk was serious about that part, serious about imparting that knowledge about the little influences that had accumulated during the middle to late 1950s especially around New York which set up that folk minute. New York like I said, Frisco, maybe in small enclaves in L.A. and in precious few other places during those frozen times a haven for the misfits, the outlaws, the outcast, the politically “unreliable,” and the just curious. People like the mistreated Weavers, you know, Pete Seeger and that crowd found refuge there when the hammer came down around their heads from the red-baiters and others like advertisers who ran for cover to “protect” their precious soap, toothpaste, beer, deodorant or whatever they were mass producing to sell to a hungry pent-ip market.  

Boston and Cambridge by comparison until late in the 1950s when the Club 47 and other little places started up and the guys and gals who could sing, could write songs, could recite poetry even had a place to show their stuff instead of to the winos, rummies, grifters and conmen who hung out at the Hayes-Bickford or out on the streets could have been any of the thousands of towns who bought into the freeze.”     

“Sweetie, I remember one time but I don’t remember where, maybe the Café Nana when that was still around after it had been part of the Club 47 folk circuit for new talent to play and before Harry Reid, who ran the place, died and it closed down, I know it was before we met, so it had to be before the late 1980s Von Ronk told a funny story, actually two funny stories, about the folk scene and his part in that scene as it developed a head of steam in the mid-1950s which will give you an idea about his place in the pantheon. During the late 1950s after the publication of Jack Kerouac’s ground-breaking road wanderlust adventure novel that got young blood stirring, not mine until later since I was clueless on all that stuff except rock and roll, On The Road which I didn’t read until high school, the jazz scene, the cool be-bop jazz scene and poetry reading, poems reflecting off of “beat” giant Allen Ginsberg’s Howl the clubs and coffeehouse of the Village were ablaze with readings and cool jazz, people waiting in line to get in to hear the next big poetic wisdom guy if you can believe that these days when poetry is generally some esoteric endeavor by small clots of devotees just like folk music. The crush of the lines meant that there were several shows per evening. But how to get rid of one audience to bring in another in those small quarters was a challenge.

Presto, if you wanted to clear the house just bring in some desperate “from hunger” snarly nasally folk singer for a couple, maybe three songs, and if that did not clear the high art be-bop poetry house then that folk singer was a goner. A goner until the folk minute of the 1960s who probably in that very same club then played for the 'basket.' You know the 'passed hat' which even on a cheap date, and a folk music coffeehouse date was a cheap one in those days like I told you before and you laughed at cheapie me and the 'Dutch treat' thing, you felt obliged to throw a few bucks into to show solidarity or something.  And so the roots of New York City folk according to the 'father.'

Laura interrupted to ask if that “basket” was like the buskers put in front them these days and Sam said yes. And asked Sam about a few of the dates he took to the coffeehouses in those days, just out of curiosity she said, meaning if she had been around would he have taken her there then. He answered that question but since it is an eternally complicated and internal one I have skipped it to let him go on with the other Von Ronk story. He continued with the other funny story like this-“The second story involved his [Von Ronk's] authoritative role as a folk historian who after the folk minute had passed became the subject matter for, well, for doctoral dissertations of course just like today maybe people are getting doctorates in hip-hop or some such subject. Eager young students, having basked in the folk moment in the abstract and with an academic bent, breaking new ground in folk history who would come to him for the 'skinny.' Now Van Ronk had a peculiar if not savage sense of humor and a wicked snarly cynic’s laugh but also could not abide academia and its’ barren insider language so when those eager young students came a calling he would give them some gibberish which they would duly note and footnote. Here is the funny part. That gibberish once published in the dissertation would then be cited by some other younger and even more eager students complete with the appropriate footnotes. Nice touch, nice touch indeed on that one, right.”

Laura did not answer but laughed, laughed harder as she thought about it having come from that unformed academic background and having read plenty of sterile themes turned inside out.       

As Laura laugh settled Sam continued “As for Van Ronk’s music, his musicianship which he cultivated throughout his life, I think the best way to describe that for me is that one Sunday night in the early 1960s I was listening to the local folk program on WBZ hosted by Dick Summer, who was influential in boosting local folk musician Tom Rush’s career and who was featured on that  Tom Rush documentary No Regrets we got for being members of WUMB, when this gravelly-voice guy, sounding like some old mountain pioneer, sang the Kentucky hills classic Fair and Tender Ladies. It turned out to be Von Ronk's version which you know I still play up in the third floor attic. After that I was hooked on that voice and that depth of feeling that he brought to every song even those of his own creation which tended to be spoofs on some issue of the day.”

Laura laughed at Sam and the intensity with which his expressed his mentioning of the fact that he liked gravelly-voiced guys for some reason. Here is her answer, “You should became when you go up to the third floor to do your “third floor folk- singer” thing and you sing Fair and Tender Ladies I hear this gravelly-voiced guy, sounding like some old mountain pioneer, some Old Testament Jehovah prophet come to pass judgment come that end day time.”
They both laughed. 

Laura then mentioned the various times that they had seen Dave Von Ronk before he passed away, not having seen him in his prime, when that voice did sound like some old time prophet, a title he would have probably secretly enjoyed for publicly he was an adamant atheist. Sam went on, “ I saw him perform many times over the years, sometimes in high form and sometimes when drinking too much high-shelf whiskey, Chavis Regal, or something like that not so good. Remember we had expected to see him perform as part of Rosalie Sorrels’ farewell concert at Saunders Theater at Harvard in 2002 I think. He had died a few weeks before.  Remember though before that when we had seen him for what turned out to be our last time and I told you he did not look well and had been, as always, drinking heavily and we agreed his performance was subpar. But that was at the end. For a long time he sang well, sang us well with his own troubadour style, and gave us plenty of real information about the history of American folk music. Yeah like he always used to say-'when the tin can bended …..and the story ended.'

As they came to the admission booth at the entrance to Crane’s Beach Sam with Carolyn Hester’s song version of Walt Whitman’s On Captain, My Captain on the CD player said “I was on my soap box long enough on the way out here. You’re turn with Carolyn Hester on the way back who you know a lot about and I know zero, okay.” Laura retorted, “Yeah you were definitely on your soap-box but yes we can talk Carolyn Hester because I am going to cover one of her songs at my next “open mic.” And so it goes.                      

Sunday, September 11, 2016

On Coming Of Age In World War II-Torn America- Summer Of 1942 (1971)-A Film Review

On Coming Of Age In World War II-Torn America- Summer Of 1942 (1971)-A Film Review






DVD Review

By Sam Lowell

Summer of 1942, Jennifer O’Neil, Gary Grimes, 1971

 

I suppose each generation goes through its coming of age period somewhat differently, coming of age meaning in beginning the treacherous process of understanding all the sexual changes and commotions once you pass puberty somewhat differently. Take the one I know about personally of coming of age in the early 1960s in the age of the “Pill,” of technology-driven space exploration and of some new as yet unspoken and undiscovered social breeze coming to shake up a lot of the old values, to turn the world upside down, from our parents’ generation. Take too the one before mine, the one represented in this film under review Summer of 1942 about the coming of age in our parents’ generation. The generation that on one edge, the older edge went through the whole trauma of the Great Depression that brought barren days to the land and of slogging World War II and at the other edge, the younger edge, missing the trauma of war and its particular stamp on those who survived went on to form the alienated youth who turned “beat,” rode homespun hot rods to perdition, grabbed a La Jolla perfect wave surf board, revved up hellish motorcycles to scare all the squares and come under the immediate spell of jailbreak rock and roll. Here is the funny thing at least on the basis of a viewing of this film on the question of dealing with sex, sexual knowledge and experiences there was a very familiar (and funny) sense that our parents who, at least in my case and the case of my growing up friends, went through the same hoops-with about the same sense of forlorn misunderstanding.               

Here’s how it played out in this film which was originally released in 1971 although the at least the two generations after mine might also recognize some of the danger signs, pitfalls and funny stuff that went on in this film around sexually coming of age in this wicked old world. The story line is based on the essentially true-to-life experiences of a Hollywood screen-writer Hermie Raucher (played by Gary Grimes), coming of age 15, and his two companions, gregarious Oscy and studious Benji, who were slumming in the year 1942 at the beautiful but desolate end of an island retreat in the first summer of the American direct involvement in the Pacific and European wars after the Japanese bombings of Pearl Harbor. (The island Nantucket Island in the book but filmed off desolate Mendocino in California in the film). They like a million other virginal boys of that age during war or peacetime were driven each in their own way by the notion of sexual experimentation and conquest and so the chase was on.      

That chase was on at two levels. The rather pedestrian one of seeking out young girls of their own age to see what shook out of the sexual tree and Hermie’s almost mystical search for “meaningful” love in the person of an older woman, Dorothy, played by Jennifer O’Neil, who had been a young war bride staying on the island after her husband headed off to war. The own age part, funny in parts, driven mostly by pal Oscy’s overweening desire to “get laid” with a blonde temptress whom he finally got his wish with on night at the secluded end of the beach with his most experienced partner. On that occasion Hermie was shut out of any desire he had to do the same with her friend who was as bewildered by sex as he was. The “older woman” (in our circles a “cradle-robbing” older woman although she was only 22) notion of love is what drove him the moment he has set eyes on her when the trio was spaying on her and her husband so he was “saving” himself for her. And after a series innocent (and some goofy) encounters with Dorothy one night, after she has just found out that her husband had been killed in the war, she bedded him (there is no other honest way to put the matter). That was that though, for when Hermie subsequently went back to the cottage she had left the island and left him a more solemn young man.              

Those are the main lines that get played out but what makes this one more than of ordinary interest to me was the whole lead-up, the whole “foreplay” if you will to be doing something about getting out of that dreaded virgin status (and avoid the designation “homo,” among heterosexual youth the bane of every corner boy guy coming up in that and the next generation). There was the very familiar inevitable (and frustrating)“feeling up” of the girl scene at the movies of which neighborhood legends are made (although Hermie missed the mark, literally, on that one), the awkward scene where Hermie was helping Dorothy with storing some packages and he got sexually excited by her off-hand helping hand touch, the scene where the three friends “discover” what sexual intercourse is all about through the good graces of Benji’s mother’s medical books (unlike most of the rest of us learned what we learned about sex in the streets, and not always correct information either), and of course the fumbling by the numbers (off-screen) when Oscy has his first sexual experience. The best scene of all though and it really showed the difference between then and now when the younger generations can grab condoms off the shelf at any drugstore or in some places right in schoolhouse restrooms (formerly “lav’s”) and who might not quite appreciate enough the scene where Hermie tried to buy “rubbers” at the local village drugstore from the jaded disbelieving druggist. Yeah, watch this one and remember your own, either sex, torturous rumbling around coming to terms with sex.     

A View From The International Left-Germany’s “War on Terror” Threatens Immigrants, Leftists, Workers

Workers Vanguard No. 1094
26 August 2016
 
Germany’s “War on Terror” Threatens Immigrants, Leftists, Workers

We print below a translation of an August 19 leaflet issued by the Spartakist-Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands, German section of the International Communist League.

The fatal shooting of nine immigrants in Munich on July 22 was an abhorrent racist crime. The man who did it was a fascist student, who chose to carry out his attack on the fifth anniversary of the mass murder in Norway of social-democratic youth by the fascist Anders Breivik. In the same week, there were two terrible terrorist attacks near Würzburg (July 18) and in Ansbach (July 24), both supposedly carried out by ISIS sympathizers. In Ansbach, 12 people were injured by the bomb with which a Syrian refugee blew himself up. Near Würzburg, a 17-year-old, probably of Afghan origin, attacked tourists from Hong Kong on a train with an ax and knife, seriously injuring five people.
The bourgeois state had evidently been waiting for an opportunity to set in motion its machinery of repression. On the Friday evening after the attack in Munich, the whole city was paralyzed under the flimsy explanation that the cops were looking for several attackers with rifles. They cordoned off the Stachus [central square], shut down the entire public transport system until Saturday morning and ordered the whole population of the third-largest city in Germany to stay at home. There was talk of a state of emergency, and 2,300 police and security forces were deployed, including the GSG 9 (special unit of the federal police). Forty-four men from the Austrian anti-terror unit Cobra were flown in by helicopter. To put some impetus behind her demand to make it easier to deploy the Bundeswehr [German army] domestically, Minister of Defense Ursula von der Leyen put 100 soldiers of a military police regiment on alert.
The whole thing was a well-prepared civil war maneuver, basically aimed at practicing ways of suppressing the working population when they again move against the capitalist system. The capitalists know that their system arouses the opposition of the exploited. In France, the Socialist Party-led government used the ongoing state of emergency, supposedly imposed against Islamic terrorists, against the mass mobilizations of workers seeking to stop the new anti-union law. For the last 15 years, the German government has also been using the “war against terror” as a pretext for the militaristic mobilization of the state; this has been directed above all against Muslims but ultimately has the workers movement as a whole in its sights.
A special forces commando shot dead the perpetrator of the train attack near Würzburg as he was fleeing. When Renate Künast (Green Party member of parliament) rightly questioned this targeted killing, the head of the German cop association started a vicious online campaign against her—which some Green politicians joined—to nip in the bud any and all criticism of the role of the police. Bavarian minister of the interior Joachim Herrmann (CSU) [Christian Social Union, Bavarian affiliate of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU)] likewise immediately justified the final deadly shot.
Four days after the attack in Ansbach, Chancellor Merkel announced a nine-point plan “against terror,” which is intended to further tighten the national security laws in force since 2001. The most ominous aspect is that the Bundeswehr and police can now carry out joint exercises for “major terrorist situations.” This June, the CDU/CSU-SPD [Social Democratic Party] government implemented a new package of anti-terror laws. Further, it is setting up a new office to assist the secret service and the Federal Criminal Police to decrypt internet communications—one more attack on everyone’s privacy. Down with the “war against terror”! Down with all the national security laws!
The government is seeking to make it easier to deport people more quickly, now even to war zones like Syria. The federal minister of the interior, Thomas de Maizière, is planning to restrict medical confidentiality, which is especially intended to intimidate those doctors who courageously campaign against the deportation of refugees. CSU and CDU ministers are agitating to abolish dual citizenship, which the SPD leadership has so far rejected. It is in the most basic interests of the working class not to be divided along ethnic lines, but to forge unity of all workers regardless of background. The unions must work for the integration of refugees into the working class, with equal pay for equal work. This will also enormously improve the chances of fighting against the capitalists and their government. Hands off dual citizenship! Full citizenship rights for all who live here! For union action to stop deportations!
The intensified state terror at home goes hand in hand with German imperialism’s increased interventions abroad. The Bundeswehr is now deployed in Africa, the Near East, the Mediterranean, the Balkans and Afghanistan. We demand in every case: Bundeswehr out! German imperialism has an extremely bloody history; in its war of annihilation against the Soviet Union (1941-45), over 27 million Soviet citizens were killed. The Hitler regime shored up the German bourgeoisie’s rule and destroyed the independent organizations of the working class. The bourgeoisie is responsible for the Holocaust—the industrial murder of millions of Jews, Roma and Sinti [Gypsies]—and the persecution and murder of communists and countless others. The Wehrmacht occupied the Balkans and subjugated the peoples living there. Today, German imperialism still sees the Balkans and East Europe as its backyard and defends its rapacious interests there against the other imperialists. Through the EU, it subjugates the other peoples of Europe, raking in massive profits with the aid of the euro. Down with the EU and German imperialism!
The imperialists are the biggest terrorists in the world, and their destruction of the Near East, which is escalating day by day, is responsible for people being driven to flee, some of them into the arms of Islamists. The development of ISIS is the direct result of the policies of the U.S. and other imperialists, who destroyed countries like Libya, Iraq and Syria. We welcome every setback for the imperialists and therefore take a military side with the Islamic State when it fights against the imperialists and their ground troops, which are the mainly Kurdish SDF (Syrian Democratic Forces) and the pesh merga. The only solution for the oppressed masses is a series of workers revolutions with the perspective of a socialist federation of the Near East. Imperialists out of the Near East!
Deploying the Bundeswehr at home is nothing new, but in contrast to France or the U.S. [e.g., the National Guard], for instance, it is not seen as normal. After Germany’s defeat in World War II and the end of the fascist regime, police and military functions were initially strictly separated. However, when the Bundeswehr was reorganized, reserve units were set up for “homeland protection.” Since 2013, 2,700 soldiers have been on standby in the 16 federal states to assist the police when the situation requires. An article in taz newspaper, “Soldiers for the Rebellious People” (10 August 2012), explains what kind of situations are meant:
“According to a general clause of the European Union, they could be deployed to assist in the case of a political general strike against supply facilities, violent mass protests, social disturbances or civil disobedience actions such as strikes and/or street barricades affecting transport and energy or the health care system.”
In 2008, the Bundeswehr was deployed against leftist demonstrators at the G8 summit in Rostock. Fighter jets flew low over the heads of the leftists, who were simply protesting the gathering of imperialist heads of state. Next year, the imperialist G20 plans to meet in central Hamburg. The intimidation against possible protests started early with a brutal cop raid in July on two leftist housing projects in the Hafenstrasse. Two hundred fifty cops, some armed with automatic weapons, forced their way into the houses; the residents, refugee solidarity activists, were threatened at gunpoint and 30 people were detained. The workers movement has an interest in defending leftists against all state terror because these are the same cops whose job is to protect the capitalists’ private property and who act as scabherders during strikes. We say: Cops out of the DGB union federation!
The reformist left, with the leadership of the Left Party in the front line, see things quite differently. Sahra Wagenknecht welcomed the cop action in Munich, and she calls on the state to carry out such actions more often. In a press statement of July 25 she explained: “Mrs. Merkel and the government now have a special responsibility to win people’s confidence in the continued ability of the state and its security forces to act.” Wagenknecht wants to strengthen this bourgeois state which, as Marx and Engels explained, is nothing other than the instrument of oppression by the ruling capitalist class.
This is the same state whose security service bolsters Nazi organizations and is deeply implicated in the series of murders of immigrants by the National Socialist Underground (NSU) between 2000 and 2006. The state safeguards and exonerates the Nazis and racists who carry out near-daily attacks on refugees and deadly arson attacks on refugee hostels. While the state protects the Nazis, keeping them in reserve as shock troops against the working class, the fascist attack in Munich was used as a pretext for enhancing the state’s forces. And the bourgeois media are going to a lot of trouble to play down the fact that it wasn’t an Islamic terrorist, but a fascist.
When there was a fascist attack at Oktoberfest in 1980, with 13 deaths and 211 injuries, the state presented it as the act of an “individual madman” and dismissed the connections to the Nazi “Hoffmann gun sport group.” As we wrote in Spartakist No. 33, November 1980: “The main priority was to keep proceeding with the normal agenda for the election campaign: the German fascist past has been ‘dealt with,’ the ‘real’ terror comes from the left—against the state.”
It is urgently necessary to get rid of the deadly illusions in the neutrality of the state; such illusions only serve to maintain the barbaric imperialist system. What we need is to establish a multiethnic revolutionary workers party that has the program to overthrow this system, in contrast to the pro-capitalist program of the Left Party and the SPD. Such a revolutionary party will imbue workers and the oppressed with the lessons of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky, which explain why socialist revolution is necessary in order to end all the evils of this society.