Monday, February 19, 2018

Veterans Call for De-escalation, Negotiations, and Peace on the Korean Peninsula Veterans For Peace, a U.S. based organization with international chapters in Japan and Okinawa, calls on the governmental leaders of the U.S., the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, aka North Korea), the Republic of Korea (ROK, aka South Korea) and Japan to stop their escalation of threatening words and actions, and begin negotiations toward the signing of the long-awaited Peace Treaty putting a final end to the Korean War. Any attempt to solve the issues dividing the Korean Peninsula by warfare would bring disaster not only to the people living there, but also to all the people living in Northeast Asia. Retired General Gary Luck, Former Commander of U.S. Forces in Korea, has estimated that such a war would leave one million dead. And what would be the aim of this war? Each side is threatening to make war on the other to punish it for threatening to make war. This is the behavior of schoolyard bullies, armed not with knives and clubs but nuclear weapons. This catastrophic war is avoidable, and must be avoided. In understanding the background to this situation, it should be remembered that the DPRK has been under nuclear threat from the U.S. ever since the Korean War in the 1950s. That their government has in recent years taken to threatening nuclear retaliation to any attacker is a wildly dangerous and morally condemnable policy, but it is not unique to the DPRK. It is a policy, invented by the U.S. and adopted by every country that possesses nuclear weapons, called “nuclear deterrence”. Every criticism heaped upon the DPRK for following this policy applies equally to every country possessing nuclear weapons. Each year the U.S. and the ROK carry out joint military exercises right up against the DPRK border, and based on the scenario of an invasion of that country. Every year the DPRK, which unsurprisingly considers this a threat, protests with verbal counter-threats and, recently, missile launchings. This year, the U.S. and Japan carried out joint military exercises at the same time as the U.S.-ROK exercises. Rhetoric has escalated. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened “fire and fury like the world has never seen”, and stated that “all options are on the table”, which means a pre-emptive strike is being considered. DPRK leader Kim Jong Un threatened to launch missiles aimed at the vicinity of Guam. Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe threatened to send Japan’s Self Defense Forces along with any U.S. invasion of the North, which would spell the final end of Japan’s Peace Constitution. Kim Jong Un responded by sending a missile over northern Japan – though not, as was claimed, violating Japan’s airspace, as when it passed over Japan it was in outer space, at an elevation even higher than that of the many satellites that legally pass over Japan every day. Prime Minister Abe, however, took advantage of the situation by calling a state of emergency in northern Japan, commandeering the national broadcasting system NHK, and also the cell-phone system, to urge people take shelter from the alleged impending attack by moving to the basements of concrete buildings (few buildings have these). Presumably Abe is hoping that the resulting panic will help him to promote his militarization plans, and in particular to gain support for his purchases of expensive counter-missile commodities. (It is noteworthy that during this “state of emergency” the trains, including the bullet trains, were kept running.) This gambling with the lives of millions has got to stop. And there is a way to stop it. DPRK, while carrying out its threatening nuclear tests and missile launchings, has repeatedly said it wants to negotiate a peace treaty ending the Korean War, which the U.S. has been refusing. But a peace treaty is a very good idea, the signing of which would allow the many hundreds of millions of people living in Northeast Asia to breathe a sigh of relief. Veterans For Peace calls on the U.S. Government to accept this offer, and to begin negotiations with the DPRK aiming at signing such a treaty and normalizing relations between the DPRK and the ROK. And as the governments of the relevant countries seem locked into their present self-destructive policies, we call upon the citizens of those countries, who surely do not want a meaningless nuclear war where they live, to demand that their governments back off and begin negotiations, which are the only way to bring peace to the region. Written by Veterans For Peace, VFP Japan and Okinawa VFP Quick Links Join/Renew Donate Vehicle Donations VFP Bylaws VFP Passed Resolutions Request Your Military Service Records Store Find A Chapter Start A Chapter Chapter Contacts Powell's Books Recent Newsletter Application for Travel Outreach Fund Contact Us Veterans For Peace 1404 North Broadway St. Louis MO 63102 vfp@veteransforpeace.org (314) 725-6005 (office) (314) 227-1981 (fax) Affiliates & Projects Arlington Memorials Chelsea Manning Support Network Courage to Resist GI Rights Hotline Golden Rule Boat Project Iraq Veterans Against the War Iraq Water Project Iraqi Student Project King Condemned US Wars International Awareness Campaign Korea Peace Campaign Military Families Speak Out The National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth (NNOMY) National Priorites Project Peace In Our Times School of the Americas Watch Service Women's Action Network (SWAN) Stop These Wars United National Antiwar Coalition Vietnam Agent Orange Relief & Responsibility Campaign Vietnam Veterans Against the War

Veterans Call for De-escalation, Negotiations, and Peace on the Korean Peninsula

Veterans For Peace, a U.S. based organization with international chapters in Japan and Okinawa, calls on the governmental leaders of the U.S., the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, aka North Korea), the Republic of Korea (ROK, aka South Korea) and Japan to stop their escalation of threatening words and actions, and begin negotiations toward the signing of the long-awaited Peace Treaty putting a final end to the Korean War.
Any attempt to solve the issues dividing the Korean Peninsula by warfare would bring disaster not only to the people living there, but also to all the people living in Northeast Asia. 
Retired General Gary Luck, Former Commander of U.S. Forces in Korea, has estimated that such a war would leave one million dead.  And what would be the aim of this war?  Each side is threatening to make war on the other to punish it for threatening to make war.  This is the behavior of schoolyard bullies, armed not with knives and clubs but nuclear weapons.  This catastrophic war is avoidable, and must be avoided.
In understanding the background to this situation, it should be remembered that the DPRK has been under nuclear threat from the U.S. ever since the Korean War in the 1950s. That their government has in recent years taken to threatening nuclear retaliation to any attacker is a wildly dangerous and morally condemnable policy, but it is not unique to the DPRK.  It is a policy, invented by the U.S. and adopted by every country that possesses nuclear weapons, called “nuclear deterrence”.  Every criticism heaped upon the DPRK for following this policy applies equally to every country possessing nuclear weapons.
Each year the U.S. and the ROK carry out joint military exercises right up against the DPRK border, and based on the scenario of an invasion of that country. 
Every year the DPRK, which unsurprisingly considers this a threat, protests with verbal counter-threats and, recently, missile launchings. 
This year, the U.S. and Japan carried out joint military exercises at the same time as the U.S.-ROK exercises. Rhetoric has escalated. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened “fire and fury like the world has never seen”, and stated that “all options are on the table”, which means a pre-emptive strike is being considered.  DPRK leader Kim Jong Un threatened to launch missiles aimed at the vicinity of Guam.  Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe threatened to send Japan’s Self Defense Forces along with any U.S.  invasion of the North, which would spell the final end of Japan’s Peace Constitution.  Kim Jong Un responded by sending a missile over northern Japan – though not, as was claimed, violating Japan’s airspace, as when it passed over Japan it was in outer space, at an elevation even higher than that of the many satellites that legally pass over Japan every day.
Prime Minister Abe, however, took advantage of the situation by calling a state of emergency in northern Japan, commandeering the national broadcasting system NHK, and also the cell-phone system, to urge people take shelter from the alleged impending attack by moving to the basements of concrete buildings (few buildings have these). Presumably Abe is hoping that the resulting panic will help him to promote his militarization plans, and in particular to gain support for his purchases of expensive counter-missile commodities. (It is noteworthy that during this “state of emergency” the trains, including the bullet trains, were kept running.)
This gambling with the lives of millions has got to stop.  And there is a way to stop it.  DPRK, while carrying out its threatening nuclear tests and missile launchings, has repeatedly said it wants to negotiate a peace treaty ending the Korean War, which the U.S. has been refusing.  But a peace treaty is a very good idea, the signing of which would allow the many hundreds of millions of people living in Northeast Asia to breathe a sigh of relief.  Veterans For Peace calls on the U.S. Government to accept this offer, and to begin negotiations with the DPRK aiming at signing such a treaty and normalizing relations between the DPRK and the ROK.
And as the governments of the relevant countries seem locked into their present self-destructive policies, we call upon the citizens of those countries, who surely do not want a meaningless nuclear war where they live, to demand that their governments back off and begin negotiations, which are the only way to bring peace to the region.
Written by Veterans For Peace, VFP Japan and Okinawa VFP

New in March: US Global Engagement & Military; Max Boot's "Road Not Taken" in Vietnam

Two interesting evenings for Smedleys joe I signed up for both !!

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: WorldBoston <wb@worldboston.org>
Date: Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 4:37 PM
Subject: New in March: US Global Engagement & Military; Max Boot's "Road Not Taken" in Vietnam
To: <jkdixie@gmail.com>


Coming up in March:
"Judicious and absorbing...Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, brings solid credentials to this enterprise...What emerges is a picture of a man who from an early point possessed an unusual ability to relate to other people, a stereotypically American can-do optimism, an impatience with bureaucracy and a fascination with psychological warfare."

"The Road Not Taken is an impressive work, an epic and elegant biography based on voluminous archival sources. It belongs to a genre of books that takes a seemingly obscure hero and uses his story as a vehicle to capture a whole era.... The Road Not Taken gives a vivid portrait of a remarkable man and intelligently challenges the lazy assumption that failed wars are destined to fail or that failure, if it comes, cannot be saved from the worst possible outcome."

How close did the United States come to pursuing a different path in Vietnam? Closer than many might think, as it turns out. In his latest book, a New York Times bestseller and an Amazon.com January 2018 Book of the Month, The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in Vietnam, Max Boot takes a fascinating look at what might have been. In this groundbreaking biography of CIA operative Edward Lansdale, Boot examines not just the man but his times, and uses extensive research and insight that reframes our understanding not only of the Vietnam War, but of conflicts elsewhere that followed. Join WorldBoston for a lively, informative discussion featuring our signature hospitality (and chowder!).

Max Boot is the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow for National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. A military historian and foreign policy analyst, he has been called one of "the world's leading authorities on armed conflict" by the International Institute for Strategic Studies. Mr. Boot is also a contributing editor to the Weekly Standard and the Los Angeles Times, a member of USA Today's board of contributors, a columnist for Foreign Policy, and a regular contributor to the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Commentary, and other publications. 
The global power balance is rapidly evolving, leaving the United States at a turning point with respect to its level of engagement and the role of its military. Some argue for an "America First" paradigm, with a large military to ensure security, while others call for a more assertive posture overseas. Some advocate for a restoration of American multilateral leadership and a strengthened role for diplomacy. Still others envision a restrained U.S. role, involving a more limited military. 

How does the military function in today's international order, and how might it be balanced with diplomatic and foreign assistance capabilities? Join us for another exciting installment of the Great Decisions lecture series as we hear answers to these and other timely questions. This event is free and open to the public, but registration is required. Refreshments will be provided!

Major General (Ret) William E. Rapp is a Lecturer in Military Affairs in the Belfer Center at Harvard Kennedy School, the Faculty Chair of the Senior Executive program in National and International Security, and the Faculty Chair for the National Security Fellows program. Major General (Ret) Rapp served more than 33 years as an active duty Army officer before retiring as a Major General. During his career as the Army's senior liaison to the U.S. Congress, Rapp has served in Germany, Japan, Iraq, and Afghanistan. His research interests include civil-military relations and organizational leadership. A graduate of West Point in 1984, he holds a Masters in Strategic Studies from the US Army War College and a Masters and PhD in Political Science from Stanford University. 
Stay connected with WorldBoston:
Like us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter

WorldBoston, West Building 1, Suite 300A, 212 Northern Avenue, Boston, MA 02210
Sent by wb@worldboston.org in collaboration with
Constant Contact

Official "National Commission on Selective Service" appointed by President and Congress plans a series of public hearings across the US.-No raft-No Way !n

Official "National Commission on Selective Service" appointed by
President and Congress plans a series of public hearings across the US.


First public hearing in Harrisburg, PA, next Friday, Feb. 23rd, 11
a.m.-1
p.m. -- please spread the word to anyone opposed to the draft and
draft
registration who might be able to make it to the hearing.

More hearings in all regions of the US to be scheduled.

Written comments being accepted through April 19th (Patriot's Day).

More info and links:

https://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/002321.html

=====

*Public hearing and written comments on draft registration*

For the first time in decades, a Federal commission is holding
open-mike
public hearings throughout the USA (starting next Friday, 23 February
2018, in Harrisburg, PA) and taking written testimony (through 19
April
2018, Patriot's Day) on whether draft registration should be ended or
extended to women as well as men; whether there should be a draft of
people with medical or other special skills regardless of age or
gender;
whether a draft would be "feasible" (it wouldn't, because so many
people
haven't registered with the Selective Service System, have moved
without
notifying the SSS, and/or would resist if drafted); and related
issues.

Despite some problems, this is by far your best and most open
opportunity
in decades to tell the Federal government to end draft registration.

In late 2015, Commander-In-Chief Obama ordered all military
assignments
opened to women. That order undercut, and probably eliminated, the
legal
argument that had been used since 1980 to justify requiring only men,
but
not women, to register for the draft.

That gave members of Congress three options, none of which most of
them
wanted to take responsibility for, in the run-up to the 2016
elections:

1. Do nothing and wait for courts to invalidate the requirement for
men to
register for the draft;

2. Repeal the requirement for men to register, and abolish the
Selective
Service System (and risk being attacked as peaceniks); or

3. Extend the requirement to register for the draft to women as well
as
men
(and risk being attacked by both feminists and sexists).

After elaborate bi-partisan machinations, Congress chose Door Number
One
("Do Nothing"). Perhaps members of Congress thought that would allow
them
to point the finger of "blame" at the courts, and away from
themselves, if
draft registration was ended. More likely they just wanted to punt
this
political hot potato past the 2016 elections into the Clinton or
Trump
Administration.

To provide further political cover for delaying its decision, Congress
voted in late 2016 to establish a National Commission on Military,
National, and Public Service "to conduct a review of the military
selective service process (commonly referred to as 'the draft')." The
Commission is required to solicit and consider public comments, and to
report back to the President and Congress with its recommendations by
March 2020 (at which time its recommendations can either be ignored,
used,
or abused to score points in 2020 election campaigns).

That Commission has now been appointed and held its first public
meeting
on 18 January 2018.

Today the Commission published:

1. A notice in the Federal Register soliciting written comments (by a
Web
form or by e-mail to "national.commission.on.service.info@mail.mil",
mentioning "Docket No. 05-2018-01" in the subject) though 19 April
2018;
and

2. An announcement on the Commission's Web site of a first public
hearing,
from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. next Friday, 23 February 2018, at the
Harrisburg
Area Community College, Midtown Trade and Technology Center, Midtown
2,
Room 206, 1500 N. 3rd St., Harrisburg, PA.

Pass the word to any of your contacts who might be able to make it
to
Harrisburg that day.

It's unclear how the Commission's hearings will be conducted. So far
as I
can tell from the announcement it appears that at least the first
hearing
will be a first-come, first-served, open microphone event, although I
have
no idea how much time each speaker will be allowed.

The law establishing the Commission requires that:

"The Commission shall conduct hearings on the recommendations it is
taking
under consideration. Any such hearing, except a hearing in which
classified information is to be considered, shall be open to the
public.
Any hearing open to the public shall be announced on a Federal website
at
least 14 days in advance. For all hearings open to the public, the
Commission shall release an agenda and a listing of materials relevant
to
the topics to be discussed."

The Commission's first planned hearing in Harrisburg, PA, on 23
February
2018, was announced on the Commission's Insprire2Serve.gov Web site
on
February 16th, only seven days in advance. The Commisison appears to
be in
flagrant violation of the statutory requirement for 14 days' notice,
and
the hearing in Harrisburg, if it is held on February 23rd, will be
unlawful. As of a week before the planned hearing, no agenda has
been
released.

Members of the Commission have said it plans to hold public hearings
in
each of the nine US Census regions over the next two years, but none
of
the other dates and locations have been announced yet. Stay tuned!

Peace,

Edward Hasbrouck


------- End of forwarded message -------
--------------------
Draft Registration and Draft Resistance:
http://www.resisters.info

Health Care Workers and the Draft:
http://www.MedicalDraft.info

Edward Hasbrouck
edward@hasbrouck.org
http://hasbrouck.org
+1-415-824-0214



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

------- End of forwarded message -------
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Smedley VFP Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to smedleyvfpforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to smedleyvfpforum@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/smedleyvfpforum/CAEUbeDWJjjB-FPy0YsTubBMoSihwMy98RZ6fB8Y88g%3DkAxqxsg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

In Somerville Ma-2/28 The Murder of Fred Hampton, film fundraiser & discussion

H via Act-MA
Film & Discussion: The Murder of Fred Hampton
Weds 2/28, 6:30-9pm
@ Parts & Crafts
577 Somerville Ave, Somerville
Wheelchair Accessible
$10 includes vegan snacks

Join the Boston chapter of the Uhuru Solidarity Movement for a screening
& discussion of the documentary "The Murder of Fred Hampton"

Fred Hampton was the Chair of the Illinois Chapter of the Black Panther
Party who was brutally assassinated by the FBI and Chicago police as
part of their vicious COINTELPRO program, created to destroy the rising
Black Revolution of the 60s. White people who supported the Panthers
were nowhere to be found as Panther leaders were murdered and imprisoned.

Today, COINTELPRO is back with the latest FBI designation of "Black
Identity Extremists”,  which is targeting African people as terrorists
if they identify as black, Muslim, Moorish, African etc and is the
State’s newest war of colonial violence against African people’s right
to self-determination and liberation. The Uhuru Solidarity Movement is
engaged in a campaign right now, #NoToFBI where this time in 2018, white
people will not be complicit! We will defend the Black Revolution and
organize in solidarity with African people's right to resist and
liberate themselves. Join us for an engaging discussion after the film
where we will discuss this campaign, how you can get involved, and learn
why white people MUST take a stand against the US government’s war
against the black community!

$10 at the door includes vegan snacks and is a fundraiser towards the
Black Power Blueprint project. On March 28th, USM Boston will be hosting
The Reparations Tour: White Solidarity with the Black Power Blueprint,
where speakers engaged in the project will present on the work being
done to build black economic development in St. Louis. (@ the Warehouse
XI, 11 Sanbourn Court in Somerville MA, 7pm.)

We will also have T-shirts, patches, and art for sale from the Art For
Reparations project, as well as free literature to take home to learn
more about the movement for white reparations to African people.

Register to attend: FredHamptonUSMBoston.eventbrite.com
Facebook event: https://www.facebook.com/events/191886761401577/

---------

The Uhuru Solidarity Movement is the anti-colonial, anti-imperialist
organization of white people working under the leadership of the African
People’s Socialist Party. We organize in the white community for
reparations to African people.
https://www.uhurusolidarity.org/usm-principles-of-unity/

_______________________________________________
Act-MA mailing list
Act-MA@act-ma.org
http://act-ma.org/mailman/listinfo/act-ma_act-ma.org
To set options or unsubscribe
http://act-ma.org/mailman/options/act-ma_act-ma.org

No tax giveaways for General Dynamics At Bath Irons Works

To  Peaceworks  

http://bangordailynews.com/2018/02/17/opinion/letters/monday-feb-19-2018-st-clair-for-congress-another-school-shooting-hayes-for-governor/

No tax giveaways for General Dynamics

The same moral bankruptcy being played out in our nation’s capital seems, unfortunately, to be echoed in our state.
With the release of the proposed budget, we have in print how the Trump administration proposes to pay for the $1.5 trillion in “tax relief” for the rich who control our nation’s legislative agenda — by devastating cuts to critical programs and services for the rest of us to the tune of $1.7 trillion. Of course, the Pentagon is spared.
Here in Maine, we’re having a $60 million tax break for General Dynamics, parent company of Bath Iron Works, foisted upon us. LD 1781, sponsored by Rep. Jennifer DeChant of Bath, would extend the corporate welfare that General Dynamics has extracted from Maine. This at a time when General Dynamics is spending $9.6 billion to buy CSRA Inc., a provider of IT services focused on national security. Among other things, this deal is expected to add to General Dyanmics’ earnings per share, which should help a lot when it comes to stock buybacks.
Imagine for a moment the real-world needs that could be met in Maine with $60 million. There are so many it’s hard to know where to start: education, health care, the opioid crisis, food insecurity and crumbling infrastructure, to name a few. One thing is for sure: providing corporate welfare to General Dynamics is not one of them. It is outrageous and irresponsible to consider doing so.
Connie JenkinsOrono