Thursday, March 14, 2019

20th century Civil Rights movement and 21st century Human Rights movement come together as Fair Food tour lands in Atlanta! Coalition of Immokalee Workers

Coalition of Immokalee Workers<workers@ciw-online.org>
[...] The tour crew’s brief but energizing stay in Atlanta was perhaps best captured in the story behind the picture at the top of today’s post. 

In the course of the afternoon’s protest, Mercedes came to learn that Charles Black was one of a handful of students who, nearly 60 years ago, had the great fortune to take a class in philosophy from Dr. Martin Luther King. The idea that she was in the presence of someone who personally knew, and fought side by side with, Dr. King, was so exciting to Mercedes that she stepped out of the protest and sought out Mr. Black for a conversation on his experience in the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s. As it turned out, Mr. Black was not only happy to oblige Mercedes’ request, but was also deeply impressed himself to learn of Mercedes’ own commitment to the CIW’s struggle (she was part of the children’s contingent that supported their parents in last year’s unforgettable Freedom Fast). 
The two leaders — one, a key leader of the most important social movement of the past century, the other, a young and upcoming leader of one of the most important human rights movements of this new century — came together in that moment in Atlanta, and for that moment they were carrying the same torch, across generations, across eras. But now, though the time to pass that torch is surely still many, many years off, Mr. Black can rest assured that when that time comes, it will be in good hands.
Coalition of Immokalee Workers
Connect with us

She's challenging the horror of returning veteran violence in the home RootsAction Education Fund

RootsAction Education Fund<info@rootsaction.org>
Via  info=rootsaction.org <info=rootsaction.org@mail.salsalabs.net>
Stacy Bannerman secured the first-ever Congressional hearing on the effects of war on families of veterans, and helped break the national silence about the horror of returning veteran violence in the home, which she wrote about in her 2015 book, "Homefront 911: How Families of Veterans Are Wounded By Our Wars." She is now pursuing accountability from a new angle, as she describes in this note to RootsAction supporters: 



I’ve come to terms with the fact that there will be zero accountability for the illegal Iraq War launched on March 19, 2003. Although I admit I still struggle when the Gold Star parents on my Facebook feed post photos of their only child who was killed in Iraq, or who killed themselves when they came home.

In the 16 years since the “Shock and Awe” bombing of Baghdad, millions of lives have been destroyed, including mine. My husband served two combat tours and came home with severe PTSD, which led to crystal meth addiction, near-fatal domestic violence, and ultimately, the loss of my home, marriage, health and healthcare, income, and security.

During those 16 years, there’s also been a stockpiling of proof that Bush & Co., and their Congressional co-conspirators, knew they were starting a war based on 935 lies.1

The government knew and chose to hide the truth at the expense of billions of dollars and millions of lives, mostly Iraqi civilians. I’ve had to accept that. But I’m not yet willing to accept that there will be no accounting for that fact that the government has known for decades that combat veterans have a violence problem at home, and has chosen to protect the veteran at the expense of the family (spouse and child).

I’m working with a small, but growing, group of victims and survivors trying to change that, but we cannot do it without your contribution (which is tax deductible).



According to the VA’s own research, combat vets with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are more likely than any other demographic in the nation to commit potentially lethal domestic violence. In fact,
  • A 2006 study by the Department of Veterans Affairs found that veterans with PTSD were “significantly more likely to perpetrate violence toward their partners.” Over 80 percent had committed at least one act of violence in the previous year, nearly half being severe violence, which includes shooting, stabbing, or strangulation, as defined by the Conflict Tactics Scale.2
  • 54 percent of Iraq/Afghanistan vets struggling with PTSD and alcohol abuse had engaged in severe aggression or severe violence in the preceding 12 months, most often against spouse, intimate partner, or children. (Joint study by VA and University of North Carolina, 2014)
Rather than comply with VA policy to report known or suspected abuse, VA providers often tell the veteran’s spouse/caregiver (92 percent are wives) to pack a “bug out bag,” and how they can change their behavior to prevent the veteran from getting triggered and attacking them again. Shifting the burden of blame to the victim while normalizing the violence are hallmarks of grooming and cultural complicity.

One caregiver and mother of three young children received phone calls from the VA on several occasions after the husband/veteran had left the building locked and loaded, warning her, “GET OUT of the house right now!” Police were called, but refused to arrest (I had the same experience), and VA staff refused to report. She finally left permanently, and safely, in part because of the underground railroad run by military spouses and former wives of veterans who are in the unpaid business of saving the lives of women and children when the VA and this nation have failed us all.

I researched and wrote about combat veteran violence in my book, "Homefront 911."3  I specifically composed "Chapter Four: I Am Not the Enemy," with the intent of making the case in the hopes that one day an avenue for litigation would be opened. In August of 2018, it was.4

Perhaps you caught the recent story on 60 Minutes about the Climate Kids lawsuit against the U.S. government.5 The suit contends that the U.S. government knowingly failed to protect them from climate change. If this can go to trial, then perhaps a lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of women and kids alleging the U.S. government knowingly failed to protect them from veteran domestic violence can, too.

I’m willing to try.

Will you please donate to help me find out?






Stacy's finances have been ruined. She has no savings, and can only continue with our support. 

Click here to support Stacy Bannerman and her upcoming work with a tax-deductible donation.Half of every dollar you donate will go directly to Stacy, while the other half will support RootsAction Education Fund's efforts to raise up the voices of whistleblowers and truth-tellers.

A rare level of courage, clarity, and credibility is required for the work that Stacy Bannerman does, and the massive project she’s got underway. Please consider making a donation today to help Stacy stay housed and mobile and provide the financial stability necessary as she’s making the case for federal accountability for the families who are killed or wounded when the war comes home.



-- The RootsAction Education Fund Team

Footnotes:
1. CNN: Study: Bush, Aides Made 935 False Statements
2. New York Times: When Strains on Military Families Turn Deadly
3. Homefront 911: How Families of Veterans Are Wounded By Our Wars
4. Military Times: Veterans Can Now File Class-Action Lawsuits Against VA
5. 60 Minutes: Climate Change: What 10 Presidents Have Known


Donate buttonFacebook buttonTwitter button

Click here to unsubscribe and stop ALL email from RootsAction.
empowered by Salsa

'This Is Historic': US Senate Passes War Powers Resolution to End Complicity in World's Worst Humanitarian Crisis "Millions of grassroots activists, who helped make this vote a reality, want their lawmakers to end this unconscionable war." by Jake Johnson, staff writer


Published on
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
by

'This Is Historic': US Senate Passes War Powers Resolution to End Complicity in World's Worst Humanitarian Crisis

"Millions of grassroots activists, who helped make this vote a reality, want their lawmakers to end this unconscionable war."
by





"This Senate vote moves us one step closer to ending U.S. support for the catastrophic war in Yemen, a war that makes America complicit in the worst humanitarian crisis in the world,"
Paul Kawika Martin, senior director for policy and political affairs at Peace Action, said in a statement. (Image: Win Without War)


In a major step toward ending U.S. complicity in the world's worst humanitarian crisis, the Senate on Wednesday passed a War Powers resolution to cut off American military support for the Saudi-led coalition's assault on Yemen.
"This Senate vote moves us one step closer to ending U.S. support for the catastrophic war in Yemen, a war that makes America complicit in the worst humanitarian crisis in the world."
—Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action
The final vote count was 54-46.
"This is historic. For the first time in 45 years, Congress is one step closer to withdrawing U.S. forces from an unauthorized war," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the lead sponsor of the resolution, declared following the vote. "We must end the war in Yemen."
Kate Gould, legislative director for Middle East policy at the Friends Committee on National Legislation, applauded the grassroots activists who have been working tirelessly to end America's disastrous role in Yemen.
"The Senate has now taken a decisive step in ending the American facilitation of the Yemen war and the world’s largest humanitarian crises," Gould said. "Millions of grassroots activists, who helped make this vote a reality, want their lawmakers to end this unconscionable war."
Passage of the resolution comes as the Saudis continue to launch deadly airstrikes in Yemen with U.S. backing, worsening a crisis that has already resulted in mass suffering and tens of thousands of deaths. Earlier this week, dozens of civilians—including women and young children—were killed by Saudi airstrikes in Yemen's Kushar district.
According to the United Nations, 14 million Yemenis could soon be on the brink of starvation if the bombing continues. Save the Children, a London-based human rights organization, estimated in a report last November that 85,000 Yemenis under the age of five have starved to death since the Saudi-led coalition began bombing the country.
"The fact is that the United States, with little media attention, has been Saudi Arabia's partner in this horrific war. We have been providing the bombs the Saudi-led coalition is using, refueling their planes before they drop those bombs and assisting with intelligence," Sanders said during a speech on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. "The bottom line is the United States should not be supporting a catastrophic war led by a despotic regime with a dangerous and irresponsible foreign policy."
Watch the full speech:
"This Senate vote moves us one step closer to ending U.S. support for the catastrophic war in Yemen, a war that makes America complicit in the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," Paul Kawika Martin, senior director for policy and political affairs at Peace Action, said in a statement.
In addition to putting an end to America's role in the slaughter of Yemeni civilians, supporters said the resolution also reasserts Congress' constitutional authority over war.
"Congressional authority over war was designed to avoid the type of situation that’s been unfolding in Yemen, where unauthorized U.S. military support began without public debate or scrutiny," Martin said. "The Senate's vote to end the U.S. role in Yemen is also a vote to re-democratize our nation's foreign policy."
The Yemen War Powers resolution will now head back to the House of Representatives, the final roadblock before the measure reaches President Donald Trump's desk.
In a statement before Wednesday's vote, the White House said it "strongly opposes" the resolution and suggested Trump will veto the measure if it passes the House. A two-thirds majority vote by both chambers of Congress would be needed to override a possible Trump veto.
"Ending U.S. support will put even more pressure on Saudi Arabia and the UAE to change their tactics and finally negotiate an end to the war," Martin concluded. "Now that the new Senate has passed the resolution, the House needs to pass the same clean version of the resolution to finally send it to the president’s desk."

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MAPA Nuclear Disarmament" group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To post to this group, send email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament@googlegroups.com
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mapa-nuclear-disarmament/1dc501d4d9fa%246f127900%244d376b00%24%40texnology.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Giving the Bomb to Saudi Arabia’s Dr. Strangelove Chris Hedges Columnist Chris Hedges is a Truthdig columnist, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, a New York Times best-selling author, a professor in the college degree program offered to New Jersey state prisoners by Rutgers…

Giving the Bomb to Saudi Arabia’s Dr. Strangelove
Chris Hedges
Columnist
Chris Hedges is a Truthdig columnist, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, a New York Times best-selling author, a professor in the college degree program offered to New Jersey state prisoners by Rutgers…

The most dangerous foreign policy decision of the Trump administration—and I know this is saying a lot—is its decision to share sensitive nuclear technology with Saudi Arabia and authorize U.S. companies to build nuclear reactors in that country. I spent seven years in the Middle East. I covered the despotic, repressive kingdom as the Middle East bureau chief for The New York Times. And I, along with most Arabists in the United States, have little doubt that giving a nuclear capability to Saudi Arabia under the leadership of the ruthless and amoral Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman would see it embark on a nuclear weapons program and eventually share weaponized technology with Saudi allies and proxies that include an array of radical jihadists and mortal enemies of America. A nuclearized Saudi Arabia is a grave existential threat to the Middle East and ultimately the United States.
The drive to build nuclear reactors in Saudi Arabia is led by the half-wit son-in-law of the president, Jared Kushner, who met Tuesday with Salman in Riyadh, the Saudi capital, to discuss “ways to improve the condition of the entire region through economic investment,” according to the White House. Prominently involved in that economic program are corporations such as IP3 International, a consortium of U.S. companies led by several retired generalsand admirals and others who stand to make millions from the deal.
The Saudi government, which is soliciting bids for the nuclear reactors, reportedly spent more than $450,000 over a one-month period to lobby the Trump administration to approve its purchase of the equipment and services from U.S. sources. Westinghouse Electric Co. and other American companies are preparing to construct the facilities, which would allow Saudi Arabia to enrich and reprocess uranium. The secretive effort to give Saudi Arabia a nuclear capability is not only colossally stupid, but has been done without being reviewed by Congress, as required by law, and violates the Atomic Energy Act.
Salman, whose psychopathic traits remind me of Saddam Hussein, is widely believed to have ordered the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. He has imprisoned dissidents, brutally ousted rivals, seized over $100 billion in extortion money from kidnapped and tortured members of the royal family and instilled a level of fear and terror inside the kingdom, always a repressive society, unrivaled in its modern history.
Donald Trump and Kushner, by shamelessly defending Salman, even in the face of CIA declarations that the agency has “high confidence” the prince ordered the killing and dismemberment of the Washington Post journalist, are accessories to murder. Not surprisingly, the White House ignored a deadline this month that the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations set for making a report on Khashoggi’s assassination. Kushner, whom the Saudi leader reportedly claimed to have “in his pocket,” did not appear to have raised the Khashoggi murder in last week’s meeting, the first face-to-face encounter he has had with Salman since the assassination.
Salman has not ruled out weaponizing any nuclear facilities. He stated in 2018: “Without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.” He has also refused to accept any restrictions on enriching uranium and processing plutonium.
Nuclear weapons can be made from uranium or plutonium. The uranium-235 isotope is used in nuclear reactors and nuclear bombs. However, it is less than 1 percent of the naturally occurring element and must be increased—the process is called enrichment—to about 5 percent to work in nuclear reactors. To make nuclear bombs it must be enriched to about 90 percent. Enrichment is carried out by using high-speed centrifuges. This means that the machines that produce nuclear reactor fuel for civilian use can also be used to produce nuclear bombs. It is for this reason that nuclear material in civilian enrichment facilities in nations that do not have nuclear weapons, or have promised not to produce nuclear weapons, such as Iran, is closely monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
An enrichment plant used to fuel one nuclear reactor has the potential to produce 20 nuclear bombs a year by using some 300 centrifuges to enrich uranium-235 to the 90 percent level. A nuclear bomb requires about 55 pounds of highly enriched uranium. The more high-speed centrifuges a country has, the faster weapons-grade uranium can be produced.
Salman and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insist there is a secret Iranian nuclear weapons program, despite all intelligence reports, including Israeli intelligence reports, to the contrary. So, given their unique version of reality, the time to start a weapons program in Saudi Arabia is now. Israel has a nuclear arsenal with hundreds of weapons.
Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, has issued an interim staff report giving testimonies of multiple whistleblowers who warn about the impending transfer of nuclear technology. It lays out in chronological detail the secretive and blatantly illegal efforts by the Trump White House to facilitate Saudi Arabia’s purchase and construction of the nuclear reactors.
The efforts by Saudis and Americans began before Trump took office. Saudi officials, including Khalid Al-Falih, the minister of energy, met with Kushner in New York before the inauguration. The Saudi delegation held out the promise of spending $50 billion on American defense contracts over four years.
IP3 executives Gen. Keith Alexander, Gen. Jack Keane, Bud McFarlane and Rear Adm. Michael Hewitt, as well as the chief executives of six other companies—Exelon, Toshiba America Energy Systems, Bechtel, Centrus Energy, GE Energy Infrastructure and Siemens USA—sent a letter to Salman three weeks before the Trump inauguration that presented a plan to build nuclear reactors in Saudi Arabia. They called it “the Iron Bridge Program,” the report states, and characterized it as “a 21st Century Marshall Plan for the Middle East.”
Michael Flynn, then the incoming national security adviser and one of the former business partners in the venture, sent a text to Alex Copson of ACU Strategic Partners on Inauguration Day assuring him that the nuclear project was “good to go” and suggested that Copson contact his colleagues to “let them know to put things in place,” the report reads.
On Jan. 27, 2017, a week after the inauguration, Derek Harvey, who from January to July 2017 was the senior director for Middle East and North African affairs at the National Security Council, met at the White House with a group of IP3 leaders whom he had invited.
“Immediately after the meeting, Mr. Harvey directed the NSC staff to add information about IP3’s ‘plan for 40 nuclear power plants’ to the briefing package for President Trump’s [planned phone] call with King Salman [the prince’s father and the prime minister of Saudi Arabia],” the report reads. “Mr. Harvey also stated that General Flynn wanted President Trump to raise the ‘plan for 40 nuclear power plants’ with King Salman and that this was the ‘energy plan’ that had been developed and approved by General Flynn during the presidential transition.”
When the NSC staff informed Harvey that the transference of nuclear technology to a foreign country had to comply with the Atomic Energy Act, he dismissed the complaint, saying, in the words of the report, that “the decision to transfer nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia had already been made during the presidential transition and that General Flynn wanted President Trump to raise ‘the nuclear power plants’ with King Salman.”
On Jan. 28, 2017, the report reads, “General Flynn and Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland received two documents in their official White House email accounts in a message entitled, ‘Launching the Marshall Plan for the Middle East’ from Mr. McFarlane, a co-founder and Director of IP3 and a former national security advisor to President Reagan who pleaded guilty to participating in the Iran-Contra cover-up in 1988.”
The documents included a draft cover memorandum from Flynn to Trump and a draft memorandum “for the President to sign” directing agency heads to lend support to Thomas Barrack—who managed Trump’s inaugural committee and raised funds for Trump and whose investment firm, Colony NorthStar, would profit from the nuclear deal—for the implementation of the IP3 plan.
“The second document was formatted as a Cabinet Memorandum from the President to the Secretaries of State, Defense, Treasury, and Energy; the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” the report reads. “It stated that President Trump had assigned Mr. Barrack as a special representative to oversee implementation of the Middle East Marshall Plan: ‘I have assigned a special representative, Tom Barrack, to lead this important initiative and I am requesting him to engage each of you over the next 30 days to gain your input and support for our Middle East Marshal [sic] Plan.’ ”
On March 14, 2017, Trump, along with Kushner, met with Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the Oval Office. They discussed “a new United States-Saudi program . . . in energy, industry, infrastructure, and technology worth potentially more than $200 billion in direct and indirect investments within the next four years.”
Frances Townsend, a director on IP3’s board, a national security analyst for CBS and a homeland security adviser under President George W. Bush, “contacted White House Homeland Security Advisor Thomas Bossert about the Middle East Marshall Plan” on March 28, 2017, the report reads.
“Ms. Townsend subsequently sent NSC staff several documents: (1) an overview of the Middle East Marshall Plan that appeared to be produced by IP3; (2) a document entitled ‘The Trump Middle East Marshall Plan (White Paper by Tom Barrack)’ dated March 10, 2017; (3) the letter that IP3 leaders Mr. McFarlane, General Keane, Rear Admiral Hewitt, and General Alexander addressed to Saudi Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on March 17, 2017; and (4) the January 1, 2017, letter to Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman signed by IP3 leaders General Alexander, General Keane, Bud McFarlane, and Rear Admiral Hewitt, as well as the chief executives of six companies: Exelon Corporation, Toshiba Energy, Bechtel Corporation, Centrus, GE Power, and Siemens USA.”
Barrack’s white paper read: “The President will appoint a special representative for the Trump Middle East Marshall Plan with the diplomatic rank of ambassador or special advisor [to] the President.” It also stated, the report reads, that the special envoy should “coordinate and work hand-in-hand” with government officials, including Kushner.
“The white paper stated that the President should implement the Middle East Marshall Plan through an executive order,” the report reads. “It described the Special Envoy as building ‘long-line relationships with U.S. private sector leaders acting as their expediter in clearing the traditional regional and regulatory hurdles to their participation’ and ‘trusted relationships with top leaders of GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] countries, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Iraq.’ ”
The House committee staff report says most of the whistleblowers who spoke to the committee were able to document developments only during the early months of the administration. There have been few recent leaks from inside the White House on the nuclear deal. Secretary of Energy Rick Perry, Kushner and IP3 executives are currently overseeing the project.
“In January 2018, Brookfield Business Partners, a subsidiary of Brookfield Asset Management, announced its plans to acquire Westinghouse Electric for $4.6 billion,” the report notes. “Westinghouse Electric is the bankrupt nuclear services company that is part of IP3’s proposed consortium to build nuclear reactors in Saudi Arabia, and which stands to benefit from the Middle East Marshall Plan. In August 2018, Brookfield Asset Management purchased a partnership stake in 666 Fifth Avenue, a building owned by Jared Kushner’s family company.”
“On February 27, 2018, Goldman Sachs announced that former Deputy National Security Advisor Dina Powell, who had helped manage Jared Kushner’s relationship with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and plan President Trump’s 2017 visit to Saudi Arabia, would be joining the Goldman Sachs’ sovereign wealth group,” the report reads. “Goldman Sachs wrote in an internal memorandum that ‘Dina will focus on enhancing the firm’s relationships with sovereign clients around the world.’ Ms. Powell reportedly ‘is especially close to Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and the country’s ruling family.’ ”
“In March 2018, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman undertook a ‘last-minute visit to New York,’ where he housed his entourage at the Trump International Hotel in Manhattan for five days, a stay that reportedly ‘was enough to boost the hotel’s revenue’ by 13 percent ‘for the entire quarter,’ ” the report reads.
On Feb. 12, 2019, Trump met in the White House with several private nuclear power developers. The meeting, the report states, was “initiated by IP3 International.”
“The meeting was reported to include discussions about U.S. efforts ‘to secure agreements to share U.S. nuclear technology with Middle East nations, including Jordan and Saudi Arabia,’ ” the report reads.
There is little time left to halt the transfer of nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. Iran, a mortal enemy of Saudi Arabia, will have no choice but to begin a nuclear weapons program if the Saudis build nuclear reactors. The thought of nuclear weapons being in the hands of Salman, an updated version of Saddam Hussein, and ultimately in the hands of nonstate radical jihadists who are supported and funded by powerful elements within Saudi Arabia, is terrifying.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MAPA Nuclear Disarmament" group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To post to this group, send email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament@googlegroups.com
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mapa-nuclear-disarmament/1e0a01d4d9ff%24ea8cc950%24bfa65bf0%24%40texnology.com
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.