Click on the headline to link to the "Boston.com" high school sports section. Hey, it's the only link that I could think to give some flavor to this post.
Markin comment:
Well, I guess I can trust Frankie after all. Frankie, Francis Xavier Riley, my old middle school and high school pal who I have been telling one and all about in a few stories, stories that prove, prove beyond a doubt, that teen angst, teen alienation, teen love, teen whatever is not some recent invention. Hell, even we now celebrated (maybe) baby-boomers had those maladies. I would further argue that we developed them into rarefied art forms, but that is for another time.
What I have on my mind at this time is based on Frankie’s creditable story about his pre- friendship with me (with me, Peter Paul Markin) adventures in the great carnival skees night. I got kind of nervous at first when he started right off the bat about my take on his attempt to be king of the teen dance club night scene but by the end of his tale I kind of automatically dismissed his early remark as just sour grapes and a rather unreasonable bitterness about a mere passing fancy. The carnival skees story, well, it was good. Frankie good.
Like I said in the introduction to Frankie’s guest skees story I have plenty of my own carnival and amusement park stories to tell, with and without Frankie, and will, but today I am, once again, giving my space over to Frankie, Frankie straight up, Frankie in his own voice, and his story about how he fared as a budding young football star. The time of this story is, as least the heart of it, also once again just before I linked up with him in middle school (I didn’t arrive at the school until about mid-school year of seventh grade). As I also mentioned in introducing the skees story the other stories I have told you about were from later, later, when I was there as an eye witness so I can trust them a little. This one though also seems kind of, well, Frankie-like so let him take responsibility for telling it.
Note: I do not have, other than as sporting propositions (bets, okay), as a fervent youthful follower of the hometown North Adamsville High School football team, and a rooting interest in the results of the “mythical” college football national championships, have much insider information about the nature of the game on the field and so do not really know much about the inside stuff that Frankie will tell you, if he does so. You know things like how to crack block a guy across from you and not get caught by the refs, or what kind of jaw-breaking stuff to have in your hands for the close in-fighting, or talking trash about the mother of the guy across from you to throw him off his game. Kid’s stuff really. If it sounds kind of fishy to you don’t blame me, or if you, can let me know where something is off and set me straight so I can tell Frankie off.
Francis Xavier Riley comment:
Football is serious business, American-style football that is, manly football, not that namby-pamby old sod knee pants and polo shirt soccer stuff everybody else in the world calls football. At least it was serious, American serious, business in my 1950s growing-up cold-water flat in a North Adamsville tenement, Sagamore Street tenement, presided over by one Patrick James Riley, my father, but known far and wide (neighborhood, far and wide, especially Shamrock Grille far and wide) as “Boyo” Riley.
Who knows, I certainly don’t in any case, when I got my first inkling that football was indeed the serious business of the Riley quarters. Maybe a Cold War night pick-up sandlot grade school game where blessed, or half-blessed, maybe, Patrick “Boyo” Riley, cheered bloody murder from the sidelines when my oldest brother, four years older brother, Tommy (known as “Tommy Thunder” in his high school playing days for those who remember that legendary North Adamsville High name) pushed one over the goal-line.
Or, maybe, even back before memory, before football name memory, sitting in the old (now old), wind-swept, uncomfortable-seat Veterans Stadium watching, totally confused and only marginally interested, as North Adamsville duked it out with cross-town arch-rival Adamsville for bragging rights for the year on hallowed Thanksgiving Days. Or, maybe, and more probable than not, hearing the lord Boyo making another of those ill-timed, ill-advised “sneak” (sneak from my mother, blessed mother, not half-blessed, no way, Maude) bets over the hushed telephone on “Fighting Irish” Notre Dame in their ignoble 1950s black night period.
Although I cannot name that first time, for sure, I can name the time of the time of Francis Xavier Riley’s understanding of when he knew he had better make football serious business, or else. Yes, indeed it was that sandlot grade school game, that now inevitable Riley baptism game where that self-same blessed, or half-blessed, maybe, Patrick “Boyo” Riley, cheered bloody murder from the sidelines when my next older brother, two years older brother, Timmy (known as “Timmy the Tiger” in his high school playing days for those who remember that also legendary North Adamsville High name) pushed one over the goal-line. That’s where Boyo laid down the law that come next fall, that 1956 next fall, I would be getting my Riley turn to tear up that sandlot over the younger brothers of those on the field that day.
And I bought into it, bought into it heart and soul, then anyway. So, naturally, dutifully the next fall I was in passed down uniform as one Patrick “Boyo” Riley screamed bloody murder from the sidelines as I performed my Riley baptism in that sandlot grade school game, and pushed my own football over the goal-line. Pushed that football for all it was worth, moaning and groaning, twisting and turning, all one and ten pounds of me, maybe, over some guys like Fallon, McNally, and Hennigan, who would take their own places alongside Tommy Thunder and Timmy the Tiger come their Class of 1964 North Adamsville time.
But I have to tell you about the why, seriously. The why of why I bought into the Riley curse. Sure I was just a grade school kid of ten and didn’t know what the hell I wanted, or didn’t want. And, yes, before you all go off and try to psycho-analyze my behavior to kingdom come, I wanted to please Boyo. Or else. That "or else" being a boxing, or six, behind the ears, if you didn’t know. And actually football was fun, for the minute it took anyway, to find “daylight” and run like crazy, unimpeded, on that field toward that goal-line. With Boyo, and his cronies screaming that bloody murder like crazy. (I didn’t know until later, about twenty years later, that the damned fool bet, “sneaky” bet, from my mother, as usual, heavily on these games with said cronies. Jesus.)
But that’s just the obvious stuff. Here’s the boy’s-eye stuff that kept me going for more than a while. Tommy (I won’t use the Thunder part, although Markin would probably beat that nickname to death if he told the story) was beginning to make a name for himself up at the high school, even if it was only the junior varsity at first, when I started to notice how I fit into the Riley scheme of things. See, because Tommy, tough, hard, chip off the old block (of Boyo, naturally), corner boy, hell, king corner boy who else would it be, bulging tee-shirt, swivel-hipped Tommy was getting attention for his football exploits. People, old people, and others would give me the “nod.” You know the nod, right. Nothing said, just a little tip of the neck to signify that you were somebody, or related to somebody that mattered in the North Adamsville universe. And, of course, I gave that same nod back to signify that I knew that they were paying proper respect to the brother of their knight-errant. Ask Markin about it, about the nod. I think, now that I have had a good amount of time to think on it, that half the reason that he hung around me was to bask in that nod glow. Yah, ask him, although on this so-called "pre-markinian” stuff he may be agnostic. The bastard. Whatever else I swear just the nod, and the expectation of the nod, kept me on track for a year, maybe more.
There’s more though, and maybe in today’s hyped-up and pampered football world when serious prospects start getting the royal treatment at about age six this is no big deal. Tommy started to get some serious attention from my father’s cronies (there is no other way to describe this Irish mafia lot, who inhabited that Shamrock Grille like it was a holy sanctuary, and, although I didn’t realize it at the time, it was) and “cadging” an occasion drink, a liquor drink, a fellowship liquor drink from them. Yah, everybody wanted to be around Tommy, just for the rub off. And you know, I still don’t know whether all that crazy attention was good or bad. See, the idea was that they thought that he was going to be picked up by some college team after high school (he really was that good) and they would have inside information on some real bets. Of course, they all secretly or openly, were praying, if they knew how to pray, or remembered, wanted that college to be black night 1950s Notre Dame but I don’t know for a fact that they were all that choosy about what school took him.
Okay enough with the early reasons. They were all right, and sufficient, but as Tommy’s fame grew a little wider (and Timmy started making moves in that same football star direction) all of a sudden (all of a sudden for then girl-shy, but girl-interested, girl mystery charms interested anyway, me) girls, good-looking girls, some from the high school, some from I don’t know where, started showing up at the Sagamore Street cold-water flat. With cars. And with letting Tommy drive those cars. And not some dumpy your father’s car either (if your father had a car, which Boyo, like Markin’s father, usually didn’t which is probably why we both friendship connected on the car issue).
Sure the cars were a draw early, sweet Chevvies, some convertibles, a little of this and that but as I got older just having those girls around when I started to know the what’s up about girls, although there still was plenty of mystery about them, was enough. See, the girls were practically camped out in front of the house. They obviously didn’t notice or care about the crooked, jammed front door that you had to lift just right to get in the front door of the tenement downstairs. Or that paint, that paint that was desperately needed about six years before as the shingles had that weather-beaten look, that weather-beaten look that spoke of careless renters and not owner-occupiers. All I know was that there were horns at all times of the day and night, especially in summer, pushed down by nervous girls of all sizes and shapes, all foxy sizes and shapes that is.
This you will not believe but one time three girls showed up together. I asked them where they were going to meet the other two guys on the date at just to pass the time of day (and, as Tommy’s brother, to see whether they met my secret worthiness test). And one, one honey blond, slender with black Capris on, and, and , well, let’s leave it at that, plus about a hundred pounds of purring sexuality (and who caused me more than one restless night, and a few hundred Hail Marys) said, “Oh no, we’re all going together with just Tommy.” What? And Tommy, Tommy said, well, you know what he said- “What can a man do?” Yes, indeed, what can a man do. So I will give you three guesses about what kept me motivated, football motivated, when the nod thing got old.
And so, as 1958 arrives and “serious” seventh grade organized middle school football was all the talk, you expect me to now go into my own Riley legendary status. Right? And I would, except there isn’t one. See, old rugged, chip off the old block, corner boy tough (and that was tough in those days if you wanted to keep your place in front of some mom and pa variety store) Tommy and old muscle-chiseled Timmy got whatever one Patrick “Boyo” Riley (and sainted Maude) had to give in the way of football genes to his progeny. Tommy weighed in at about 210, a mean football field 210 (heck, that was a corner store hangout, beach shoreline drinking bout complete with hanging girls, off-hand barroom brawl 210 as well) and chiseled Timmy (no drink) at 195. I never weighed more than 120 (or more than 140, wet or dry it seemed, all through high school) once I made my big move at that sandlot debut I told you about before. More than that though, I had the "slows" that need no further description, and was un-coordinated to boot. Finished. So in seventh grade, the autumn “pre-markinian” (watch Peter Paul go crazy over that one like he did when he read my skeets story) seventh grade part, I tried out for the team but didn’t make it. And, funny, the old man, the old man for once did not box ears, or moan and groan about some mystical Fighting Irish lost and continued black night because I was not going to, single-handedly, save their “bloody arses” (a Boyo quote on that last part).
But still, and blame this strictly on Tommy and Timmy not the old man, the half-blessed old man, maybe, and certainly not sainted Ma, Maude, I developed a very, a very healthy, interest in girls, and kept looking for one like that honey blond that I interviewed and told you about before. (Ya, the one that gave me the restless nights, that one.) But, see, that kind of thing takes a whole different skill set. You bet it does. So when I didn’t make the team I started going book nutty. Oh sure I liked books before, and liked to read, especially detective stories (that’s where I got half the names I made up to call twists, oops, girls), but now I started to read everything and anything.
Why? Well, maybe you don’t remember, or maybe you’re just too young to know, but when we were growing up and Markin will back me up on this, christ we talked about it enough, the “beat” thing, or as Markin put it in one of his foolish stories about me the “faux” beat thing, was in high gear. What I noticed, or two things I noticed, was that the “beat” girls I saw in Boston and Cambridge looked kind of foxy (and kind of easy to get to know) and that some of the nubiles (ya, girls, I learned that one from going to the Museum of Fine Arts over there on Huntington Avenue in Boston. They had some neat Egypt stuff there too.) at old North Adamsville Junior High (ya, ya, I know just like Markin that it’s now middle school) were dressing kind of “beat.” So I started dressing (much to Maude’s and Boyo’s displeasure, especially Maude’s) beat-flannel shirt, work boots (couldn’t afford engineer boots that I would have died for), black chino pants (no cuffs, Markin, get it) and my own personal touch, what I was known for from middle school to the end of high school- my midnight sunglasses.
So with my dressing the part and my new found wisdom I started to make my moves, my “faux” beat moves, quietly at first just a little off-hand remark here or there to some girl. Most moved off, offended by something, probably the midnight sunglasses in school. But here is where psychology comes in. If I started saying stuff in a sing-song way, a really be-bop way like you’d see or hear the beat poets do, and I kept at it rather than give up after a few words some of the girls, and here is the beautiful part, some of the best looking, cutest, and brightest girls, the girls that counted started to stay around me. That’s where Markin came in, came to our school, and cashed in on my psychological insights.
And guess who one of the girls was who liked my pitter-patter, although not the first, definitely not the first with her little Catholic rectitude thing (a serious copy of Ma Maude’s little Catholic rectitude thing), my everlovin’ sweetie, my main squeeze (although I wouldn’t dream of calling her that to her face, even in private), my middle school and high one and only, Joanne. Now Markin said this thing was about football so I will see if I can talk him into letting me tell you about the ins and outs of my “courtship” of Joanne another time. Probably not, see, they, Markin and Joanne, didn’t get along, although they were always civil to each other, at least that’s how I remember it. But, maybe, I can tell you something here that will cause him to relent. Markin was sweet, sweet as a girl-shy, off-beat, hell, timid, boy could be, in middle school, on Joanne. And she was sweet on him, at least that’s what I heard. Sweet on him before I worked my be-bop in the 1950s schoolboy beat night on her. After that, strictly no contest.
As for the football. Did I regret not growing big enough to eat a house for lunch and have room to spare and also not having to work overtime to have the girls come ‘round the house like they did with Tommy and Timmy. Well, yes I did, but like Tommy always used to say- “What’s a man to do?’’ Do not get me wrong, I spend many an enjoyable granite-grey autumn Saturday afternoon watching and screaming my head off as the lads, some of those same lads that I ran roughshod over in sandlot grade school, did their business, especially that final victory over arch-rival Adamsville High in November, 1963. The thing is what they did the rest of the week? Those six periods of gym per day must have been exhausting. Those 'study' halls must have really taxed their abilities to the limit. Moreover, being fed the victor's grapes by nubile young women must have atrophied their mental capacities. Meanwhile this long gone daddy, this arcane knowledge-ladened long gone daddy, with Markin in tow, always in tow, be-bopped his way into the 1960s night.
This space is dedicated to the proposition that we need to know the history of the struggles on the left and of earlier progressive movements here and world-wide. If we can learn from the mistakes made in the past (as well as what went right) we can move forward in the future to create a more just and equitable society. We will be reviewing books, CDs, and movies we believe everyone needs to read, hear and look at as well as making commentary from time to time. Greg Green, site manager
Thursday, October 04, 2012
From The "American Left History" Blog Archives- On The Paris Commune
March 18, 2006 marks the 135th Anniversary of the establishment of the heroic Paris Commune. As militants honor the Communards we should also draw the lessons of the Commune for today’s struggles. Below is a commentary on some of those lessons. There are others.
When one studies the history of the Paris Commune of 1871 one can learn something new even though from the perspective of revolutionary strategy the Communards made virtually every mistake in the book. Nevertheless, one can still learn lessons from those experiences and measure the mistakes of the Communards against the experience acquired by later revolutionary struggles and above all by later revolutions, not only the successful Russian Revolution of October 1917 but the failed German, Hungarian, Bulgarian, Chinese and Spanish revolutions in the aftermath of World War I. More contemporaneously we also have the experiences of the partial victories of the later Chinese, Cuban and Vietnamese revolutions in the post-World War II period.
Notwithstanding the mistake made by the Communards and the contradictory nature of the later revolutions cited above, and as if to show that history is not always totally a history of horrors against the fate of the masses, militants today proudly honor the Paris Commune as a beacon of the socialist revolution. It is just for that reason that Karl Marx fought tooth and nail in the First International to defend it against the rage of capitalistEurope and faint-hearted elements in the European labor movement. As he noted, the Commune truly was the first workers government. Thus, it is one of the revolutionary peaks or the international labor movement.
Many working class tendencies, Anarchist, Anarcho-Syndicalist, Left Social Democratic, Communist and Left Communist justifiably pay homage to the defenders of the Paris Commune and claim its traditions. Why does an organization of short duration and subject to savage reprisals still command our attention? The Commune shows us the heroism of the working masses, their capacity to unite for action, their capacity to sacrifice themselves in the name of a future, more just, organization of society. Every working class tendency can honor those qualities, even those parliamentary-based organizations which are far removed from any active need to do more than pay homage to the memory of the fallen Communards.
Nevertheless, to truly honor the Communards it is necessary to understand that along with its positive qualities at the same time the Commune shows us the many times frustrating incapacity of the masses to act in their objective interests, their indecision in the leadership of the movement, their almost always fatal desire to halt after the first successes. Obviously, only a revolutionary party sure of itself and of its program can provide that kind of leadership in order fight against these negative trends. At that stage in the development of the European working class where political class consciousness was limited to the vanguard, capitalism was still capable of progressive expansion and other urban classes were at least verbally espousing socialist solutions it may have been improbable that such a mass organization could have been formed. Nevertheless such an organization was objectively necessary to seize and, more importantly, to hold power.
The Commune thus, in embryo, presents the first post-1848 Revolution instance of the crisis of revolutionary leadership of the international labor movement. That is, the necessity of a revolutionary party to order to lead the working class to victory. Placing the problems facing the Commune in this context made me realize that this crisis of revolutionary leadership really has a much longer lineage that I had previously recognized. I had formerly placed its start at the collapse of the Socialist International at the beginning of World War I when most European socialist parties took a defensist position toward their own governments by voting for war credits. Unfortunately, this leadership question is still to be resolved.
It is a truism in politics, including revolutionary politics, that timing is important and many times decisive. As many commentators have noted, seizure of power by the Commune came too late. It had all the possibilities of taking the power on September 4, 1870 rather than March 18, 1871 and that would have permitted the proletariat ofParis to place itself at the head of the workers of the whole country in their struggle. At the very least it would have allowed time for the workers of other cities and the peasantry in the smaller towns and villages to organize their forces for action in defense of Paris and to create their own communes. Unfortunately the Parisian proletariat had neither a party, nor leaders forged by previous struggles who could or would reach out to the rest of France .
Furthermore, a revolutionary workers' party, while entirely capable of using parliamentary methods is not, and should not, be a machine for parliamentary wrangling. In a revolution to rely solely on such activity amounts to parliamentary cretinism. One can think of the role of the Mensheviks and Social Revolutionaries in the Provisional Government and the Soviets after the February Revolution inRussia in 1917. In Paris the Central Committee of the National Guard, the embodiment of organizational power and in effect the prototype for a Workers’ Council or Soviet, had more than its share of such wrangling and confusionist politics. The most militant elements within it needed to form a revolutionary party to break this impasse.
In contrast, a revolutionary party is the accumulated and organized experience of the proletariat. It is only with the aid of the party, which rests upon the whole history of its past, which foresees theoretically the road forward, all its stages, and knows how to act in the situation, that the proletariat avoids making the same historical mistakes, overcomes its hesitations, and acts decisively to seize power. Unfortunately, history shows no other way to defeat the class enemy. Needless to say those same qualities are necessary to retain power against the inevitable counter-revolutionary onslaught. The proletariat ofParis did not have such a party. The result was that the revolution broke out in their very midst, too late, and Paris was encircled. Like other revolutionary opportunities six months delay proved fatal. Capitalist society cruelly exacted its revenge. That is the great lesson of the Commune.
Contingent history is always problematic. Nevertheless in the interest of fully drawing the lessons of the Commune let me highlight some actions which were entirely possible at the time but were not carried out. Later revolutionaries, particularly the Bolsheviks, did incorporate these lessons into their strategies. Again this presupposes the existence of a revolutionary party capable of learning these lessons.
First, let us note that if the working class had political power on March 18, 1871 it was not because it had been deliberately seized, but because its enemies had leftParis . This is very different political and psychological position from a position of the earlier French revolutions of 1789 and 1848 and the later Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. The proletariat took power by default due to the bankruptcy of the then current bourgeois leadership headed by Thiers and a lack of confidence of the masses in it. Thus, this turn of events required an offensive strategy as an elementary act of self-defense. This did not happen.
Was such a strategy possible? The government fledParis in order to concentrate its forces elsewhere. Unfortunately, it was allowed to do so with impunity. Furthermore, as can be noted in other revolutions this first success of the revolutionary forces was a new source of passivity. The enemy had fled to Versailles . At that moment the government apparatus could have been crushed almost without the spilling of blood. In Paris , all the ministers could have been taken prisoner. If necessary, and as later events showed it proved necessary, they could have been used as hostages against future reprisals. Nobody would have defended them. It was however not done.
The Commune also had the complete possibility of winning even the peasant regiments, for the latter had lost all confidence and all respect for the power and the command. Yet it undertook nothing towards this end. The fault here is not in the relationships of the peasant and the working classes, but in the revolutionary strategy. The Bolsheviks went out of their way to court the demoralized peasant regiments stationed inPetrograd and elsewhere. The key to win those elements then was the land question and an end to the war. While the animating issues might be posed differently the Commune had those same possibilities to win the declassed peasant elements.
Moreover, after the defeats at the hands of the Germans the thread which tied the officers and the demoralized soldiers was pretty thin. The fleeing soldiers were hostile to the officers and thus the army was not reliable. Had there been a revolutionary party inParis , it would have incorporated into the retreating armies some agitators. The party would have instructed those agitators to increase the discontent of the soldiers against the officers in order to free the soldiers from their officers and bring them back to Paris to unite with the people. This could easily have been realized, according to the admissions of Thiers' supporters themselves. Nobody in the Central Committee of the National Guard even thought of it.
The Central Committee of the National Guard drew its authority from democratic elections. At the moment when the Central Committee needed to develop to the maximum its initiative in the offensive, deprived of the leadership of a proletarian party, it lost its head, hastened to transmit its powers to the representatives of the Commune which required a broader democratic basis. And, as Marx noted, it was a great mistake in that period to play with elections. But once the elections had been held and the Commune brought together, it was necessary to concentrate everything in the Commune at a single blow and to have it create an organ possessing real power to reorganize the National Guard. This was not the case. By the side of the elected Commune there remained the Central Committee; the elected character of the latter gave it a political authority thanks to which it was able to compete with the Commune. But at the same time that deprived it of the energy and the firmness necessary in the purely military questions which, after the organization of the Commune, justified its existence.
Without question the Central Committee of the National Guard needed to be led. It was indispensable to have an organization incarnating the political experience of the proletariat from previous battles and always present-not only in the Central Committee, but in the working class districts ofParis . By means of a Council of Deputies or other such broad-based formation-here they naturally centered on the organs of the National Guard-the party could have been in continual contact with the masses, known their state of mind; its leading center, most probably a central committee, could each day put forward a slogan which, through the medium of the party's militants, would have penetrated into the masses, uniting their thought and their will. If an offensive was to have a chance of success it needed such guidance.
Moreover, the real revolutionary task consisted of assuring the proletariat the power all over the country.Paris as a capital city naturally had to serve as its base. To attain this goal, it was necessary to defeat Versailles without the loss of time and to send agitators, organizers, and armed forces throughout France . It was necessary to enter into contact with sympathizers, to strengthen the hesitators and to shatter the opposition of the adversary. Instead of this offensive policy which was the only thing that could save the situation, the leaders of Paris attempted to seclude themselves in an individual commune. Their fatal policy amounted to not attacking others if the others do not attack them. The Communards stubbed their toes on this outdated premise.
Naturally, nobody can reasonably argue that a revolutionary party can create the revolution at will. It does not choose the moment for seizing power as it likes, but it intervenes actively in the events, penetrates at every moment the state of mind of the revolutionary masses and evaluates the power of resistance of the enemy, and thus determines the most favorable moment for decisive action. This is the ABC’s of revolutionary strategy. This is the most difficult side of its task. The more deeply a revolutionary party penetrates into all aspects of the proletarian struggle, the more unified it is by the unity of goal and discipline, the speedier and better will it arrive at resolving its task. To state the necessity of such conditions answers the question regarding the ultimate bloody fate of the Commune.
The comparison of March 18, 1871 inParis with November 7, 1917 inPetrograd is very instructive from this point of view. In Paris , there is an absolute lack of initiative for action on the part of the leading revolutionary circles. The proletariat, armed earlier by the bourgeois government, is in reality the sole power in Paris, has all the materialmeans of power-cannon and rifles-at its disposal, but it is not aware of it. This is the classic ‘dual power’ situation. The bourgeoisie makes an attempt to retake the weapons. The attempt fails. The government flees in panic from Paris to Versailles . The field is clear. The "leaders" are, however, in the wake of events, they record them when the latter are already accomplished, and they do everything in their power to blunt the revolutionary edge.
In contrast, in the lead up to the Russian October Revolution after the attempted counter-revolution of General Kornilov on Petrograd in August a purely military organ, the Revolutionary War Committee was created standing at the head of thePetrograd garrison. Commissioned by the Soviet it is in reality a legal organ of armed insurrection. At the same time commissars were designated in all the military units, in the military schools, arsenals, etc. The clandestine military organization accomplished specific technical tasks and furnished the Revolutionary War Committee with fully trustworthy militants for important military tasks. The essential work concerning the preparation and the realization and the armed insurrection took place openly under the cover of defense. Again, the Communards had those same possibilities, perhaps more so, as the internal enemy was rather less significant than in Petrograd . Learn these lessons. LONG LIVE THE MEMORY OF THE PARIS COMMUNE!!
When one studies the history of the Paris Commune of 1871 one can learn something new even though from the perspective of revolutionary strategy the Communards made virtually every mistake in the book. Nevertheless, one can still learn lessons from those experiences and measure the mistakes of the Communards against the experience acquired by later revolutionary struggles and above all by later revolutions, not only the successful Russian Revolution of October 1917 but the failed German, Hungarian, Bulgarian, Chinese and Spanish revolutions in the aftermath of World War I. More contemporaneously we also have the experiences of the partial victories of the later Chinese, Cuban and Vietnamese revolutions in the post-World War II period.
Notwithstanding the mistake made by the Communards and the contradictory nature of the later revolutions cited above, and as if to show that history is not always totally a history of horrors against the fate of the masses, militants today proudly honor the Paris Commune as a beacon of the socialist revolution. It is just for that reason that Karl Marx fought tooth and nail in the First International to defend it against the rage of capitalist
Many working class tendencies, Anarchist, Anarcho-Syndicalist, Left Social Democratic, Communist and Left Communist justifiably pay homage to the defenders of the Paris Commune and claim its traditions. Why does an organization of short duration and subject to savage reprisals still command our attention? The Commune shows us the heroism of the working masses, their capacity to unite for action, their capacity to sacrifice themselves in the name of a future, more just, organization of society. Every working class tendency can honor those qualities, even those parliamentary-based organizations which are far removed from any active need to do more than pay homage to the memory of the fallen Communards.
Nevertheless, to truly honor the Communards it is necessary to understand that along with its positive qualities at the same time the Commune shows us the many times frustrating incapacity of the masses to act in their objective interests, their indecision in the leadership of the movement, their almost always fatal desire to halt after the first successes. Obviously, only a revolutionary party sure of itself and of its program can provide that kind of leadership in order fight against these negative trends. At that stage in the development of the European working class where political class consciousness was limited to the vanguard, capitalism was still capable of progressive expansion and other urban classes were at least verbally espousing socialist solutions it may have been improbable that such a mass organization could have been formed. Nevertheless such an organization was objectively necessary to seize and, more importantly, to hold power.
The Commune thus, in embryo, presents the first post-1848 Revolution instance of the crisis of revolutionary leadership of the international labor movement. That is, the necessity of a revolutionary party to order to lead the working class to victory. Placing the problems facing the Commune in this context made me realize that this crisis of revolutionary leadership really has a much longer lineage that I had previously recognized. I had formerly placed its start at the collapse of the Socialist International at the beginning of World War I when most European socialist parties took a defensist position toward their own governments by voting for war credits. Unfortunately, this leadership question is still to be resolved.
It is a truism in politics, including revolutionary politics, that timing is important and many times decisive. As many commentators have noted, seizure of power by the Commune came too late. It had all the possibilities of taking the power on September 4, 1870 rather than March 18, 1871 and that would have permitted the proletariat of
Furthermore, a revolutionary workers' party, while entirely capable of using parliamentary methods is not, and should not, be a machine for parliamentary wrangling. In a revolution to rely solely on such activity amounts to parliamentary cretinism. One can think of the role of the Mensheviks and Social Revolutionaries in the Provisional Government and the Soviets after the February Revolution in
In contrast, a revolutionary party is the accumulated and organized experience of the proletariat. It is only with the aid of the party, which rests upon the whole history of its past, which foresees theoretically the road forward, all its stages, and knows how to act in the situation, that the proletariat avoids making the same historical mistakes, overcomes its hesitations, and acts decisively to seize power. Unfortunately, history shows no other way to defeat the class enemy. Needless to say those same qualities are necessary to retain power against the inevitable counter-revolutionary onslaught. The proletariat of
Contingent history is always problematic. Nevertheless in the interest of fully drawing the lessons of the Commune let me highlight some actions which were entirely possible at the time but were not carried out. Later revolutionaries, particularly the Bolsheviks, did incorporate these lessons into their strategies. Again this presupposes the existence of a revolutionary party capable of learning these lessons.
First, let us note that if the working class had political power on March 18, 1871 it was not because it had been deliberately seized, but because its enemies had left
Was such a strategy possible? The government fled
The Commune also had the complete possibility of winning even the peasant regiments, for the latter had lost all confidence and all respect for the power and the command. Yet it undertook nothing towards this end. The fault here is not in the relationships of the peasant and the working classes, but in the revolutionary strategy. The Bolsheviks went out of their way to court the demoralized peasant regiments stationed in
Moreover, after the defeats at the hands of the Germans the thread which tied the officers and the demoralized soldiers was pretty thin. The fleeing soldiers were hostile to the officers and thus the army was not reliable. Had there been a revolutionary party in
The Central Committee of the National Guard drew its authority from democratic elections. At the moment when the Central Committee needed to develop to the maximum its initiative in the offensive, deprived of the leadership of a proletarian party, it lost its head, hastened to transmit its powers to the representatives of the Commune which required a broader democratic basis. And, as Marx noted, it was a great mistake in that period to play with elections. But once the elections had been held and the Commune brought together, it was necessary to concentrate everything in the Commune at a single blow and to have it create an organ possessing real power to reorganize the National Guard. This was not the case. By the side of the elected Commune there remained the Central Committee; the elected character of the latter gave it a political authority thanks to which it was able to compete with the Commune. But at the same time that deprived it of the energy and the firmness necessary in the purely military questions which, after the organization of the Commune, justified its existence.
Without question the Central Committee of the National Guard needed to be led. It was indispensable to have an organization incarnating the political experience of the proletariat from previous battles and always present-not only in the Central Committee, but in the working class districts of
Moreover, the real revolutionary task consisted of assuring the proletariat the power all over the country.
Naturally, nobody can reasonably argue that a revolutionary party can create the revolution at will. It does not choose the moment for seizing power as it likes, but it intervenes actively in the events, penetrates at every moment the state of mind of the revolutionary masses and evaluates the power of resistance of the enemy, and thus determines the most favorable moment for decisive action. This is the ABC’s of revolutionary strategy. This is the most difficult side of its task. The more deeply a revolutionary party penetrates into all aspects of the proletarian struggle, the more unified it is by the unity of goal and discipline, the speedier and better will it arrive at resolving its task. To state the necessity of such conditions answers the question regarding the ultimate bloody fate of the Commune.
The comparison of March 18, 1871 in
In contrast, in the lead up to the Russian October Revolution after the attempted counter-revolution of General Kornilov on Petrograd in August a purely military organ, the Revolutionary War Committee was created standing at the head of the
On The 11th Anniversary Of The Afghan War- From The "Amercain Left History" Blog Archives-
THEY MAY BE OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS BUT THESE ARE NOT OUR TROOPS! END THE OCCUPATION OF IRAQ NOW!! IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL OF UNITED STATES/ALLIED TROOPS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST!!!
FORGET DONKEYS, ELEPHANTS AND GREENS- BUILD A WORKERS PARTY!
In light of the recent seemingly never-ending revelations concerning American military atrocities toward Iraqi civilians it is high time to set the record straight about the appropriate slogans that anti-war militants use to affect the political outcome of the situation in Iraq . For those militant leftists, including this writer, who have opposed the American war aims since before the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 our main slogan expressing our opposition to imperialism has been for the immediate withdrawal of all American and Allied forces from the Middle East . That continues to be the thrust of our political struggle today. But, more, much more, is necessary to accomplish that goal. It is no longer up to us-the ball is in the court of the rank and file service personnel in Iraq .
The recent revelations also underscore the aimless nature of the occupation. The role of American troops has been reduced to search and destroy missions against the so-called insurgents with the Iraqi population cast merely as subjects for ‘collateral damage’ in pursuit of that strategy. Moreover, as of August 1, 2006 troops are being deployed in Baghdad , essentially as hostages, in the sectarian civil war between Shia and Sunni. Enough!! Those militants old enough to remember the Vietnam War or who have studied about it must be painfully aware of the similarities to the current situation. Most infamously-Remember My Lai .
Nevertheless the bulk of anti-war militants, abetted by the organizations which have led the anti-war demonstrations over the years (yes, years)such as the United for Justice and Peace Coalition have centered their calls for action on the social patriotic slogans Bring the Troops Home or Bring Our Troops Home. Even though some elements of that movement have begun calling for Immediate Withdrawal recently the demand is still tied to getting our ‘boys and girls’ out of harms way. While no one, including this writer, wishes harm to individual servicemen and women this is politically dishonest.
Why are such slogans social patriotic? The essence of such calls is that the American troops used to destroy Iraq and murder and maim Iraqi civilians are our troops rather than agents of the American government- the main enemy of the peoples of the world. Those slogans imply there is just a misunderstanding over policy which reasonable people can disagree over. That is transparently not the case. The hard fact is that we citizens have no control over the military deployment of any troops. To say so creates illusions that we do. While we have no interest in seeing individual soldiers harmed we also cannot take political and military responsibility for their use. If we are going to get anywhere with opposition to the war we better give up these last illusions on that score. We cannot have it both ways. Not on this issue. Support the troops-Hell, no!
Take the pledge- No more illusions! No more social patriotic support for their troops in Iraq ! Fight under the slogan- Immediate Withdrawal Now-By any means necessary!
On The 11th Anniversary Of The Afghan War- From The "American Left History" Blog Archives-"AN OPEN LETTER TO THE RANK AND FILE SOLDIERS IN IRAQ"
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE
RANK AND FILE SOLDIERS IN IRAQ
Your
Commander-In-Chief and Chain of Command have stabbed you in the back.
The politicians,
Democratic and Republican, have stabbed you in the back and spit in your face.
The anti-war movement
has failed you miserably.
Damn, the ball is in
your court now. It is time to leave.
This writer usually
relies on his own resources to distribute his commentaries. For this important
commentary, he urgently asks for the help of anyone whether you agree, agree a
little or for that matter violently disagree with the contents to disseminate
it. Let the service men and women in Iraq decide what they want about
it. If you have friends, relatives or know anyone serving in Iraq e-mail, fax, call or write a
letter (if anybody does that anymore) to them about this commentary.
Brother and Sister Soldiers, Sailors and Air Personnel in Iraq , you and I
need to talk. However, before we do so I want to come to the table with clean
hands. Directly below are the headlines and first paragraph of a blog (dated,
August 4, 2006) written by me and placed on several Internet sites recently:
AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL
ANTI-WAR ACTIVISTS- TAKE THE PLEDGE -SUPPORT THE TROOPS-HELL, NO!
THEY MAY BE OUR SONS
AND DAUGHTERS BUT THESE ARE NOT OUR TROOPS! END THE OCCUPATION OF IRAQ
NOW!! IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL OF UNITED STATES/ALLIED TROOPS FROM THE MIDDLE
EAST!!!
“In light of the
recent seemingly never-ending revelations concerning American military
atrocities toward Iraqi civilians it is high time to set the record straight
about the appropriate slogans that anti-war militants use to affect the
political outcome of the situation in Iraq . For those militant leftists,
including this writer, who have opposed the American war aims since before the
invasion of Iraq in March
2003 our main slogan expressing our opposition to imperialism has been for the
immediate withdrawal of all American and Allied forces from the Middle East . That continues to be the thrust of our
political struggle today. But, more, much more, is necessary to accomplish that
goal. It is no longer up to us-the ball is in the court of the rank and file
service personnel in Iraq ………”
As you can see it
calls, in unambiguous terms, for all anti-war activists who have not done so
already to renounce the Support The Troops slogan which has motivated many
activists and declare forthrightly for Immediate Withdrawal Now- ‘cut and run’
if you will. This writer, an old militant leftist who has known army life, has
opposed the Iraqi debacle from before its start under that slogan. I made no
apologies for any of the above then and I make none now. But, hear me out.
It has become a truism but it bears repeating- Your
Commander-In-Chief, President George W. Bush, abetted by your Chain of Command
from Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on down has lied to you the troops who
have had to carry out their policy. Did you find, what now seems like an
ancient question, weapons of mass destruction? No. Were you ‘liberators’ of the
Iraqi peoples? No. Are you making the
world ‘safe for democracy’? Hell, no.
The Iraqi government, such as it is, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
United States
government. The Iraqi government’s writ extends no further than the Green Zone,
if there. Now, as of August 1, 2006, some of your fellow soldiers are being
sent from other parts of Iraq
to Baghdad , essentially
as hostages, in the ongoing sectarian war. As of August22, 2006 President Bush
has declared, as he has in the past, that the troops will not be withdrawn from
Iraq
on his watch. He means every word of that.
And how about the generals? This misadventure started out as
a generals’ war. “Shock and Awe.” Remember? But, it sure in hell is not a generals’
war now. Look at the lists of those killed. I do. There are plenty of
sergeants, corporals and PFC’s there but mighty, mighty thin at the officer level.
Surprise, surprise. A look at the wounded lists would undoubtedly show the same
thing.
Are your senior officers on the ground trying to keep your
butts out of harm’s way and get you out of that inferno? Hell, no. They are at
least smart enough to know not to leave the Green Zone-it is dangerous out
there beyond the zone. Hell, you know that. Now, as of August 3, 2006 your
senior command staff no longer believes in the mission. Before a Senate Armed
Services Committee panel your day to day operational commanders have sounded
the retreat. Read between the lines, please- the war is lost. Today, that idea is just in their minds,
tomorrow for they will be moving on to the next adventure. But, you ain't going
nowhere. In short, your civilian and military leaders in the chain of command are
stabbing you in the back-and they like it that way. As long as you don’t
complain.
But something must be up because Marine Corps General Pace
during the week of August 15, 2006 made a point of addressing his Marines in Iraq in person
telling them essentially all is well and stay the course. Damn, you know these
generals never talk to the rank and file soldiers unless they want something.
Hell, yes you have questions about the mission in Iraq but do not expect a straight answer
from the brass. They want something and it’s your butt on the line that they
want. He, on the other hand, flew out of Iraq the next day. Get it.
The following has also become a truism-Your Congressional
leaders, Democratic and Republican, the people who fund the war have stabbed
you in the back. They continue to vote the war budget to keep you there- Read
this from a recent blog entry of mine:
Translation- these people do not want you out of Iraq anytime
soon. While you are getting shot at, blown away and desert-addled they can wait
until next year, or the year after or (my favorite) when the situation in Iraq
becomes stabilized. Christ, your grandchildren will be fighting over there by
then. Enough said, indeed!
And what about the anti-war movement? We, and the writer
takes his fair share of political responsibility on this, did not have, and
still do not have a political strategy that would stop this war. In the final
analysis, the only way to do it is to change the government which started it in
the first place. For what it is worth the only time that a war was stopped was
when the workers and soldiers took over the government and stopped it in World
War I. That event was the revolution in Russia in 1917. That does not help us right this minute,
though.
Let me just relate one thing. The name Markin is a pseudonym
I write under. Let me tell where it comes from. Markin was a working class
sailor in the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Navy in World War I. As war-weariness
developed and it became abundantly clear that Russia could not continue in the
war and revolution was in the air Markin started organizing sailor and soldier
committees to challenge the brass and ultimately the government. To make a long
story short Markin, and eventually many other Markins were really the
individuals who stepped up the plate and did the right thing for themselves and
their buddies. Unfortunately it now is
up to you. What are you going to do? Are there any Markins out there in Iraq ?
I do not know whether this is still a part of basic training
but when I was in boot camp during the Vietnam War the Drill Sergeant used to
beat into our closely-shaven heads that the American army does not
retreat. Bull! That pearl of wisdom is
o.k. for green troops but any half-ass officer knows you damn well better have
a retreat plan. Where do you think the word ‘skedaddle’ came from? Call it
‘skedaddle’, ‘cut and run’, declare a victory in Iraq , however, you want to say it-
but it is time to leave.
I have said enough. Some talking head from cyberspace cannot
do your thinking for you. Do this, though- talk it over with your girlfriends,
boyfriends, husbands, wives, parents, children, anyone you care about and who
cares about you. Then talk to your
buddies in the barracks, on guard duty, at the PX, wherever. You know what the right thing to do is. But
above all keep your own counsel. Markin in his time knew what to do. Be a
Markin. When the troops in Iraq
say Support the Troops-Hell, No! Then you know the end of the war is near. Enough
said, for now.
From The Pen Of Joshua Lawrence Breslin- From The " Ancient Dreams, Dreamed" Sketches-"When Billie Sought To Be Church Hall Dance Champ"
Click on the headline to link to a <i>YouTube</i> film clip of the Teen
Angels performing <i>Eddie, My Love</i> to add some flavor to this sketch.
What you maybe don’t know, especially if you were not from a working class neighborhood (or a public housing project) made up of mainly Irish and Italian Roman Catholic families like I was is that “cream puff” school stuff was seen by the Church (need I add any more identifying words?) as the “devil’s playground.” Later, I found out from some Protestant friends that their church leaders felt the same way. No, not those Universalist-Unitarian types who think everything humankind does that is not hurtful is okay but real hard-nosed Protestants, like Episcopalians, Baptists, and Presbyterians. So to counter that secular godlessness, at least in our area, the Church sponsored Friday night dances. Chaste, very chaste, or that was the intention, Friday night dances.
But see, if you didn’t know before, I will remind you, Billie was a fiend to win a talent contest, a contest that, the way he figured it, was his ticket out of "the projects" and into all the cars he wanted, all the girls, and half of everything else in the world. Yah, I know, but poor boys have dreams too. And I don’t suppose it is too early to remind you, like I did with the lost sleeve teenage talent show, that Billie later spent those pent-up energies less productively, much less productively once he knew the score, his score about life. This night, this Friday night, at the start of the contest Billie was going for the brass ring though. See, Billie, secretly, at least secretly from me, was taking dance lessons, slow dance lessons with Rosalie, Christ Rosalie, the prettiest girl in our class, the girl that if I had known the word then I would have called fetching, very fetching. That was, and is, high praise from me. And, see also, teaching the pair the ropes is none other than Rosalie’s mother who before she became a mother was some kind of dance queen (I don’t know, or don’t remember, if I knew the details of that woman’s prior life before then). It was almost like the “fix was in.”
I think the judges thought so too, the junior priest, a priest that the pastor threw into this dance thing because he was closer to our ages than the old-timer "fire and brimstone" pastor was, and four ladies from the Ladies' Sodality usually took quite a bit of time before deciding who was eliminated. Rosalie’s mother (and my mother, as well) thought the same thing when we compared notes. See, now with Billie under contract (oh, yah, naturally I was his manager, or something like that) I had developed into an ace dance critic. Mainly though, I was downplaying the opposition to boost my pair's chances, and, incidentally, falling, falling big, for Rosalie. And not just for her dancing.
I, Peter Paul
Markin, seemingly, had endlessly gone back to my early musical roots in
reviewing various compilations of a classic rock series that went under the general title <i>The Rock ‘n’
Roll Era</i>. And while time and ear have eroded the sparkle of some of
the lesser tunes it still seems obvious that those years, say 1955-58, really
did form the musical jail break-out for my generation, the generation of ’68,
who had just started to tune into music.
And we, we
small-time punk (in the old-fashioned sense of that word), we hardly wet behind
the ears elementary school kids, and that is all we were for those of us who
are now claiming otherwise, listened our ears off. Those were strange times
indeed in that be-bop 1950s night when stuff happened, kid’s stuff, but still
stuff like a friend of mine, not Billie whom I will talk about later, who
claimed, with a straight face to the girls, that he was Elvis’ long lost son.
Did the girls do the math on that one? Or, maybe, they like us more brazen boys
were hoping, hoping and praying, that it was true despite the numbers, so they
too could be washed by that flamed-out night.
Well, this I
know, boy and girl alike tuned in on our transistor radios (small
battery-operated radios that we could put in our pockets, and hide from
snooping parental ears, at will) to listen to music that from about day one, at
least in my household was not considered “refined” enough for young, young
pious you’ll never get to heaven listening to that devil music and you had better
say about eight zillion <i>Hail Marys</i> to get right Catholic,
ears. Yah right, Ma, like Patti Page or Bob (not Bing, not the Bing of
<i>Brother, Can You Spare A Dime?</i> anyway) Crosby and The
Bobcats were supposed to satisfy our jail break cravings.
And that pious,
quietist, chase the devil and his (or her) devil’s music away, say a million
Acts of Contrition, church-bent, Roman Catholic church-bent, part formed a
great deal of the backdrop for how we related to that break-out rock music. And
why we had to practically form a secret cult to enjoy it. Now you all know,
since you all went to elementary school just like I did, although maybe you
didn’t attend in the Cold War, red scare, we could-all-be-bombed-dead tomorrow
1950s like I did, that those mandatory elementary school dances where we
rough-hewn boys learned, maybe we learned, our first social graces were nothing
but cream puff affairs. Lots of red-faced guys and giggling girls. Big deal,
right?
What you maybe don’t know, especially if you were not from a working class neighborhood (or a public housing project) made up of mainly Irish and Italian Roman Catholic families like I was is that “cream puff” school stuff was seen by the Church (need I add any more identifying words?) as the “devil’s playground.” Later, I found out from some Protestant friends that their church leaders felt the same way. No, not those Universalist-Unitarian types who think everything humankind does that is not hurtful is okay but real hard-nosed Protestants, like Episcopalians, Baptists, and Presbyterians. So to counter that secular godlessness, at least in our area, the Church sponsored Friday night dances. Chaste, very chaste, or that was the intention, Friday night dances.
Now these
dances from an outside look would look just like those devil-sponsored secular
school dances. They were, for example, held in the basement of the church (St.
whoever, Our Lady of the wherever, The Sacred whatever, or fill in the blank),
a basement, given the norms of public architecture, was an almost exact
rectangular, windowless, linoleum-floored, folding chairs and tables, raised
stage replica of the elementary school auditorium. That church locale,
moreover, when dressed up like on those Friday nights with the usual crepe,
handmade signs of welcome, and refreshment offerings also looked the same.
And just so
that you don’t think I am going overboard they played the same damn (oops)
music as at school, except the sound system (donated, naturally, by some pious
parishioner, looking for good conduct points from the fiery-eyed "fire and
brimstone" pastor) was usually barely audible. The real difference then,
and maybe now, for all I know, was that rather than a few embarrassed public
school teacher-chaperones drafted against their wills, I hope, or like to hope,
every stick-in-the-mud person (or so it seemed) over the age of eighteen was
drafted into the lord’s army for the evening. Purpose: to make sure there was
no untoward, unnatural, unexpected, or unwanted touching of anything, by anyone,
for any reason. So, now that I think about it, this was really the Friday night
prison dance. But not always.
Of course all
of this remembrance is just so much lead up to a Billie story. You know Billie,
Billie from “the projects” hills. William James Bradley to be exact. The Billie
who wanted fame and fortune (or at least girls) so bad that he could almost
taste it. The Billie who, as I related before, entered a teenage talent show
dressed up like Bill Haley and whose mother-made suit jacket arms fell off
during the performance and he wound up with all the girls in schools as a
consolation prize. Yes, that Billie, who also happened to be my best friend,
or, maybe, almost best friend as we never did get it straight, in elementary
school. Billie was crazy for the music, crazy to impress the tender young girls
that he was very aware of, much more aware of than I was and earlier, with his
knowledge, his love, and his respect for the music, rock music that is.
During the
summer, and here I am speaking of the summer of 1958, these church-held dances
started a little earlier and finished a little later. That was fine by us. But
part of the reason was that during July (starting after the Fourth of July, if
I recall) and August there was a weekly dance-off elimination contest. Now
these things were meant to be to show off partner-type dancing skills so I
never even dreamed of participating, although I was now hip to the girl thing
(or at least twelve year old hip to it), and gladly. Not so Billie. You know,
or if you don’t then I will tell you so you know now, that Billie was a pretty
good singer, and a pretty good shaker as a dancer. Needless to say these skills
were not on the official papal list of ways to prove you had some Fred
Astaire-like talent. What you needed to demonstrate, with a partner, a girl
partner, was waltz-like, fox-trot stuff. Stuff you were glad to know when last,
slow dance time came around but not before, please, not before.
But see, if you didn’t know before, I will remind you, Billie was a fiend to win a talent contest, a contest that, the way he figured it, was his ticket out of "the projects" and into all the cars he wanted, all the girls, and half of everything else in the world. Yah, I know, but poor boys have dreams too. And I don’t suppose it is too early to remind you, like I did with the lost sleeve teenage talent show, that Billie later spent those pent-up energies less productively, much less productively once he knew the score, his score about life. This night, this Friday night, at the start of the contest Billie was going for the brass ring though. See, Billie, secretly, at least secretly from me, was taking dance lessons, slow dance lessons with Rosalie, Christ Rosalie, the prettiest girl in our class, the girl that if I had known the word then I would have called fetching, very fetching. That was, and is, high praise from me. And, see also, teaching the pair the ropes is none other than Rosalie’s mother who before she became a mother was some kind of dance queen (I don’t know, or don’t remember, if I knew the details of that woman’s prior life before then). It was almost like the “fix was in.”
Now you know
just as well as I do that I have no story to tell, or at least no story worth
telling, if Billie and Rosalie don’t make it out of the box, if they just get
eliminated quickly. Sure they made it, and now they were standing there getting
ready to do battle against the final pair for the sainted dance championship of
the christian world, projects branch. Now my take on the dancing all summer was
there wasn’t much difference, at least noticeable difference, between the
pairs.
I think the judges thought so too, the junior priest, a priest that the pastor threw into this dance thing because he was closer to our ages than the old-timer "fire and brimstone" pastor was, and four ladies from the Ladies' Sodality usually took quite a bit of time before deciding who was eliminated. Rosalie’s mother (and my mother, as well) thought the same thing when we compared notes. See, now with Billie under contract (oh, yah, naturally I was his manager, or something like that) I had developed into an ace dance critic. Mainly though, I was downplaying the opposition to boost my pair's chances, and, incidentally, falling, falling big, for Rosalie. And not just for her dancing.
So here we were
at the finals. It was a wickedly hot night in that dungeon basement so the
jackets and ties, if wore (and that needed to be worn by the contestant males),
were off. Also, by the rules, each finalist couple got to choose their own
music and form of dancing. The first couple did this dreamy Fred Astaire-Ginger
Rodgers all hands flailing and quick-movement thing that even impressed me.
After than performance, out of the corner of my eye, I saw Billie talking to
Rosalie, talking fast and talking furiously. Something was up, definitely,
something was up.
Well, something
was up. Billie, old sweet boy Billie, old get out of the projects at any cost
Billie, old “take no prisoners” Billie decided that he was going to stretch the
rules and play to his strength by doing a Bill Haley’s <i>Rock Around The
Clock</i> jitterbug thing to show the judges his “moves” and what we
would now call going "outside the box." And he had gotten Rosalie,
sweet, fetching, deserves better Rosalie, to go along with him on it. See,
Rosalie, during all those dance lesson things had fallen for old Billie and his
words were like gold. Damn.
I will say that
Billie and Rosalie tore the place up; at least I guess Billie did because I
was, exclusively, looking at Rosalie who really danced her head off. Who won?
Let me put it this way, this time the judges, that priest and his coterie of
do-gooders didn’t take much time deciding that the other couple won. Rosalie
was crushed. Billie, like always Billie, chalked it up to the "fix"
being in for the other couple. Life was against the free spirits, he said,
something it took me a lot longer to figure out. Rosalie's family moved away
not long after that contest, like a lot of people just keeping time at the projects
until their ships to better days came in, and I heard later that she was still
furious at Billie for crossing up her chances of winning like that. Yah, but,
boy, she could twirl that thing.
From The Pen Of Joshua Lawrence Breslin- From The "Ancient Dreams, Dreamed" Sketches-"Save The Last Dance For Me"
Save The Last Dance For Me
A tow-headed boy walks, endless forget waiting for erratic Eastern Massachusetts bus-stop non-stop walks, up named streets, Captain’s Walk (evoking New England Captain Ahab great white madnesses and avenging angel purities, a kindred spirit, and land-bound searches for the great blue-pink American west night drive the frenzy instead of holy death-seeking sea drifts, although that is unnamed just now), Snug Harbor Avenue (evoking, well, just evoking home, or the theory of home, or some happy black and white television version of home), and Sextant Circle (like such a useful nautical instrument could guide some lonely, lonesome boy out of the fetid bog-fed marshes and visions of pirates seeking booty, or death). On to Taffrail Road, ah, Taffrail Road evoking ship-wreaked damsels, young, waiting for swashbuckling sailor boys raised from local old tar graveyards to restore their honor, their freedom, or just to share their bed. That last is the rub and that is the heart of the matter along those endless non-stop streets where erratic buses serve as the only way out of those clinched-fist producing streets. That tow-headed boy is enthralled, no better, enraged and engorged with his first stirring of interest in damsel time, girls if you must know, thus the time of his time. Yes, clinch those fists very tightly brother and take the ride.
Unnamed streets abound too,
up crooked cheap, low-rent, fifty-year rutted pavement streets, deeply-gouged,
one-lane snow-drift hassles streets impassable in winter hard glare and summer
sweated heat. A Street cutting off the flow to that old tar cemetery seeking
exotic writ names deep-etched in granite slab washed now by birdsong, and dung,
rather than damsel sweet smell perfumes. B Street the same, C Street the same,
same like some alphabet conspiracy against the boyhood night, against the
boyhood dream night when he dreams of manhood, or better feelings of manhood
but is clueless, utterly clueless, about what those feelings portent, ominously
portent. But what knows he of ominous, or portents for that matter. He
confesses, and no church confession either, but etched, gravestone old tar
etched, no mortal, not even hangmen evil brothers or harassing cousins, boy or
girl, should ever have to face the fifth-grade night rudderless, compass-less
and with the mark of Cain upon his neck.
After walking, endless
walking through named and unnamed streets, he heads home, not the home of home
but his dream home with her, her house home. After all who in their right mind
could curse and rail against the fifth grade-night, and why, if not for budding
portentous romance with some green tree-coded she. He dare not speak her name
for fear of jinx, or unrequited-ness.
The year before, that innocent last fourth-grade year, they, the shes of
his enflamed imagination, were all just sticks, hardly distinguishable from
boys except perhaps a little smaller, just sticks to be avoided, or ignored,
but this year a few, and she among the few, suddenly got interesting and he was
stuck, struck really, by that ironic fact, or would have been if he had known
what ironic travails he would go through before the end.
But here, watch him from
afar, as he crosses for the fifth, or fifteenth time, or fifteen hundredth time
past trees are green, coded, coded fifty years coded, endless trees are green
secret-coded waiting, waiting against boyish infinite time, infinite first
blush of innocent manhood, boyhood times, gone now, for one look, one look,
that would elude him, elude him forever. Such is life in lowly spots, lowly,
lowly spots. She some fair Rosamund and he a mere serf, and they knew it, or he
knew it although it did not stop him from wanting, or waiting for that one
glance, and that dancing blue-eyed smile.
The dance of all damn things,
the upcoming one-size-fits-all school dance, parent-approved,
headmaster-approved, hell, bishop-approved when you came right down to it, and,
hell, blessed too from what he had heard, maybe jesus, blessed, is what has him
in a mental whirl. Such tow-headed fifth-grade boy whirls made an existence, a
walked streets existence, possible just as well as “reds under every bed”
scare, russkie atomic-bomb-dropping, get out of the stinking projects and get a
new shirt at all costs that disturbed his other nights. But, christ, a two bit
dance, some later laughable Podunk gym fiesta, crepe-hanging, some surly
drafted, imprisoned teacher to “spin platters” from some RCA music box, and her
with the dancing blue-eyes and rounding shape. Yes, that thing drove him crazy,
or the possibility of it, in the fragrant perfume-soap, some girlish bath soap
for all he knew or heard about from girl cousins, american bandstand night,
And dreams of private dances
in dark shadow corners while that silly hung crepe begins to droop above their “spot”
and he first, and then she, laughs about how some fourth-grader must have hung
it, their private laugh. And dance too, no Fred Astaire waltz old-time fox trot
(except maybe that slow one at the end of the night although that was mere
planned dream echo in walked streets), but full-blossomed be-bop wild hands and
ass gyrating to some Elvis good night rocking or Chuck driving some car over
the cliff for love, or something, something unspoken, or ask the older kids who
know, know through their well-tuned grapevine, what “it” is. If they will tell
you.
All a dream, a street-walked
dream until, and when, really when he got up the nerve, the endless streets
walking nerve, to ask her. But no dance floor numbness would slake that
footsore walking thirst not then, and no high school confidential dance either
(hell elementary school was tough enough, man), handy man, breathless, Jerry
Lee freak-out blaring off some truck-bed bandstand too improbable for words. So
Rosamund fate, young damsel sighted off the sea-side taffrail slid by, and with
time the footsoreness turned into dust, or some other psychic pain whirl. But
here and now when it counted, at least, know all the rage potato sack
stick-turning-into-shape dance with coded name, trees are green, brunette. That
will come, that will come. But when?
From The Pen Of Joshua Lawrence Breslin- FromThe "Ancient Dreams, Dreamed" Sketches-"Tales From The 'Hood- The Endless Road?"
Peter Paul Markin comment:
This was the fifth and final
story about growing up in the 1950’s, the childhood period of the generation of
’68 and of my own. This series got its start as a spin-off from a previous
series entitled “History and Class Consciousness- A Working Class Saga” that
came from a look back at the trials and tribulations of a family from my old
working class neighborhood where I came of political age. The stories here go
back to an earlier time and different location to that of the housing project
where my family first started out. They are motivated by a search to find out
the whys and wherefores of how consciousness of being poor gets implanted early
in life. The poor really are different from you the reader. The “what to do
about it” part I have discussed discuss, ad infinitum, elsewhere.
As I wrote this final piece a
line from a song was going through my head, Jerry Garcia’s Ripple-“There is a
road, no simple highway, between the dawn and the dark of night” That idea of
the road, as I will discuss below, very neatly sums up the situation here. Some
of this tale is meant as obvious metaphor, other parts are the real deal. In
any case here is the central axis of this story line. In this series of
sketches I have been talking about
growing up in the 1950’s. This was quintessentially the 'golden age' of the
automobile in America. You know the vast possibilities of the open highway –
the road-and the promise of adventure-fast and effortless.
The hard fact for the Markin
family was that through most of this period we did not have that automobile to
break out with. When we did this writer remembers mainly “clunkers” with their
inevitable breakdowns in odd and foreboding locations. But, mostly, we had no
car. Even in a housing project there was a social dividing line between those
with automobiles who could get out and those who were stuck. We were, forever
it seems, dependent on the kindnesses of neighbors. Or, usually, walking,
public transportation in that isolated location then, as now, being haphazard.
I learned to dread the weekly walk to get groceries, etc. Ouch, I can still
feel those hot summer roads baking my feet.
Okay, so you can now say that
walking is good for you. Fair enough. But here is where the tale gets weird. I
have mentioned on several other occasions another wealthy peninsula (detailed
in the first tale – “A Story of Two Peninsulas”) that abutted the peninsula
where my housing project was located. I have also mentioned that I had been
stopped, young as I was, in that locale by the local constabulary who asked
where I was from and what was my purpose in being there. Hell, all I wanted to
do was to walk along the streets that paralleled the ocean there. The tip-off
for the police, apparently, was that I had entered the area on foot (as opposed
to having been driven there like ‘normal’ people, I suppose) and they took it
from there. When cops start infringing on your right to walk in public space
wherever and whenever you feel like then you know that you are in a very class-
bound society-at least in these neighborhoods. In short, I was guilty of
walking while poor. Enough said.
What have I tried to present
here? Clearly, not all class struggles are limited to the visible ones of the
picket line or the barricade. Certainly the working class struggles that I have
noted here fall well below the radar of history but they also point some hard
facts about why we have so little working class political class-consciousness.
Putting up with their class hatred of us, their social humiliation of us, the
mere fact of being poor, of being constantly on the edge of violence, and of
facing the hazards of life in a dysfunctional family that as detailed in these
stories are all impediments to political class consciousness. And that is
before we even get to the streets. Remember though “there is a road, no simply
highway”-the class struggle road.
From The Pen Of Joshua Lawrence Breslin- From The "Ancient Dreams, Dreams" Sketches- "Growing Up Absurd"
Peter Paul Markin comment:
This was the fourth of a
short series of stories about growing up in the 1950’s, the childhood period of
the generation of ’68 and of my own. This series got its start as a spin-off
from a previous series entitled “History and Class Consciousness- A Working
Class Saga” that came from a look back at the trials and tribulations of a
family, the Callahans, from my old working class neighborhood where I came of
political age. The stories here go back to an earlier time and different
location to that of the housing project where my family first started out. They
are motivated by a search to find out the whys and wherefores of how
consciousness of being poor got implanted early. That the poor, the edge of
society poor, the working poor mixed in with all the other flotsam and jetsam down
there, really are different from you, the reader. The “what to do about it”
part I have discussed, ad infinitum, elsewhere over the past forty years or so.
The previous tale in this
series that you may have just read , “A Piece of Cloth,” about my less than
heroic misadventures as an up and coming square dancer (apparently in
preparation for an career on the Grand Ole Opry) set the tone for this story. In that tale I
was subjected to a poor working class mother’s rage for cutting up one of my
precious few pairs of pants in order to impress a girl, a rich girl, well rich
compared to us. I learned then, if more painfully than was necessary, the hard
lesson that the Markin family was poor, dirt poor, in this wicked old world.
Those kinds of incidents
involving my mother and I (and my brothers, as well), although generally more
severe and less amiably subject to public treatment than that bittersweet tale
of pants and love lost, were standard fare in the Markin household. Such incidents
are, moreover, well documented in literature and the media and would be merely
cumulative if discussed here. Only the reality is grimmer than anything
portrayed in book or film. Not physically, there was thankfully little of that
in our household, but the psychological warfare was almost as devastating. Let
me nevertheless try to put this thing in some perspective now, although Lord
knows I was incapable of that as I was going through it.
I have mentioned elsewhere some
of the small details of my parent’s struggle for survival. I have also
mentioned that their life profiles fit into a familiar pattern similar to
others who survived the Great Depression of the 1930s and fought or endured
World War II. I still feel no need to go into great detail about that here. I
however find that I need to mention that my mother married my serviceman father
just out of high school and quickly became a teenage mother. Moreover, she had
great difficulties with the births of my brothers and me. The three of us
furthermore were only separated by a year or so each. In short, a handful.
Those facts along with my
father’s continual and constant difficulties in holding onto the unskilled jobs
that he was forced into meant a very, very tough existence for a woman who was
something a princess (a working class one, to be sure-there is a different but
a princess nevertheless) to her parents and brothers. The woman’s respond to
her conditions was to be in a constant rage. It was not pleasant. We called it,
among us boys, the Irish “shaming” routine. In short, what is apparent here is
that the nuclear family structure was far too narrow a basis for her and us to
survive under the circumstances. I survived. My brothers did not.
Sherry my invaluable ‘hood
historian has related some of the same kind of stories to me about her family
life except her family was larger, her mother died when she was a teenager, and
she found herself as the oldest girl taking care of the household. Others survivors
of ‘the projects’ have related very similar stories, almost monotonously so. We
need not even speak here of such things as the effects of alcoholism, and later,
drugs, and other social maladies on this fragile nuclear family structure.
To be sure, even under
socialism, it will take a massive reallocation of funds to right these kinds of
situations. Moreover, and here is the hard part for many to understand today,
rich or poor, the nuclear family structure is just too narrow a setting to free
up the potential energies of humankind. It needs be replaced.
Despite all the pains of
growing up poor, despite all the dislocations of psyche that I have dealt with
over lifetime to fight the good fight for socialism it has still been
worthwhile if only for the promise that some future generation will not have to
go through my childhood experiences. Although I will not live long enough to
see the replacement of the nuclear family with something better and more
attuned to human potentialities I am satisfied with that. On reviewing this
piece I find that it was not really a story after all but one of my political
screeds. However, remember that mother’s impotent rage against her fate. That
is the story.
Peter Paul Markin comment:
This was the fourth of a
short series of stories about growing up in the 1950’s, the childhood period of
the generation of ’68 and of my own. This series got its start as a spin-off
from a previous series entitled “History and Class Consciousness- A Working
Class Saga” that came from a look back at the trials and tribulations of a
family, the Callahans, from my old working class neighborhood where I came of
political age. The stories here go back to an earlier time and different
location to that of the housing project where my family first started out. They
are motivated by a search to find out the whys and wherefores of how
consciousness of being poor got implanted early. That the poor, the edge of
society poor, the working poor mixed in with all the other flotsam and jetsam down
there, really are different from you, the reader. The “what to do about it”
part I have discussed, ad infinitum, elsewhere over the past forty years or so.
The previous tale in this
series that you may have just read , “A Piece of Cloth,” about my less than
heroic misadventures as an up and coming square dancer (apparently in
preparation for an career on the Grand Ole Opry) set the tone for this story. In that tale I
was subjected to a poor working class mother’s rage for cutting up one of my
precious few pairs of pants in order to impress a girl, a rich girl, well rich
compared to us. I learned then, if more painfully than was necessary, the hard
lesson that the Markin family was poor, dirt poor, in this wicked old world.
Those kinds of incidents
involving my mother and I (and my brothers, as well), although generally more
severe and less amiably subject to public treatment than that bittersweet tale
of pants and love lost, were standard fare in the Markin household. Such incidents
are, moreover, well documented in literature and the media and would be merely
cumulative if discussed here. Only the reality is grimmer than anything
portrayed in book or film. Not physically, there was thankfully little of that
in our household, but the psychological warfare was almost as devastating. Let
me nevertheless try to put this thing in some perspective now, although Lord
knows I was incapable of that as I was going through it.
I have mentioned elsewhere some
of the small details of my parent’s struggle for survival. I have also
mentioned that their life profiles fit into a familiar pattern similar to
others who survived the Great Depression of the 1930s and fought or endured
World War II. I still feel no need to go into great detail about that here. I
however find that I need to mention that my mother married my serviceman father
just out of high school and quickly became a teenage mother. Moreover, she had
great difficulties with the births of my brothers and me. The three of us
furthermore were only separated by a year or so each. In short, a handful.
Those facts along with my
father’s continual and constant difficulties in holding onto the unskilled jobs
that he was forced into meant a very, very tough existence for a woman who was
something a princess (a working class one, to be sure-there is a different but
a princess nevertheless) to her parents and brothers. The woman’s respond to
her conditions was to be in a constant rage. It was not pleasant. We called it,
among us boys, the Irish “shaming” routine. In short, what is apparent here is
that the nuclear family structure was far too narrow a basis for her and us to
survive under the circumstances. I survived. My brothers did not.
Sherry my invaluable ‘hood
historian has related some of the same kind of stories to me about her family
life except her family was larger, her mother died when she was a teenager, and
she found herself as the oldest girl taking care of the household. Others survivors
of ‘the projects’ have related very similar stories, almost monotonously so. We
need not even speak here of such things as the effects of alcoholism, and later,
drugs, and other social maladies on this fragile nuclear family structure.
To be sure, even under
socialism, it will take a massive reallocation of funds to right these kinds of
situations. Moreover, and here is the hard part for many to understand today,
rich or poor, the nuclear family structure is just too narrow a setting to free
up the potential energies of humankind. It needs be replaced.
Despite all the pains of
growing up poor, despite all the dislocations of psyche that I have dealt with
over lifetime to fight the good fight for socialism it has still been
worthwhile if only for the promise that some future generation will not have to
go through my childhood experiences. Although I will not live long enough to
see the replacement of the nuclear family with something better and more
attuned to human potentialities I am satisfied with that. On reviewing this
piece I find that it was not really a story after all but one of my political
screeds. However, remember that mother’s impotent rage against her fate. That
is the story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)