Saturday, September 09, 2017

A View From The Left- NEW WARS / OLD WARS – What Could Possibly Go Wrong


EMERGENCY RALLY TO OPPOSE WAR IN KOREA
Friday, September 8
@ 5:15 pm - 6:15 pm - Park Street Station, Boston


NO FIRE, NO FURY – CATASTROPHIC WAR IS NOT AN OPTION
Yes to Negotiations – No to Escalation

Join us to insist that the Trump administration begin direct negotiations with no preconditions in order to create the conditions that lead to a negotiated settlement based on the common security of all countries involved.

IN KOREA, WHO SHOULD REALY BE AFRAID?
Pyongyang, North Korea is 6000 miles from Los Angeles. But the US surrounds Korea with dozens of bases housing tens of thousands of US troop – never mind the much larger armed forces of US allies in the region.  For decades the US maintained tactical nuclear weapons on the Korean peninsula, and today US naval and air forces around Korea deploy hundreds of nuclear weapons, with thousands more in the US which could hit North Korea. The US and South Korean armed forces regularly conductlarge joint military exercises which simulate, among other things, the invasion of North Korea.  During the Korean War from 1951-53 US airpower nearly obliterated North Korea, killing an estimated 3 million people, mostly civilians; the US and South Korea were never willing to sign a peace agreement that left a North Korean government in power, so technically a state of war still exists.


Of course, it is always worrying when a new country achieves nuclear weapons capability.  But the US has not threatened war against Israel, India or Pakistan.  If the US were genuinely concerned about nuclear proliferation and the threat of a nuclear apocalypse, then it would have a better moral basis for opposing North Korean nuclear capabilities if it were willing, together with the other nuclear weapons powers, to support the UN Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty that has the overwhelming support of the world’s nations.

Who is Begging for War? The Poor Understanding of the American Conflict in North Korea 
There is something unseemly about the fact that we – humans – have accepted the presence of thermonuclear bombs in the arsenals of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. The hyperventilation of these five hydrogen bomb powers to the North Korean test would bewilder a normal person, a person who sees world affairs with an element of rationality. What makes it morally impossible for North Korea to have a dangerous weapon of this magnitude, while it is seen as perfectly acceptable for the quivering finger of Donald Trump to rest on the button of a US inter-continental ballistic missile that carries a hydrogen bomb?  … You don’t need to understand Korean culture to see why the North Korean regime is obstinate to build up its nuclear shield. Unless the United States and its allies downgrade their threats against North Korea, there will be no possibility of peace in North-west Asia. Indeed, this no longer a regional struggle. The hydrogen bomb changes everything. This is a global catastrophe. It is necessary to demand the creation of a real process for peace, not belligerent talk from the UN chamber.   More

Stepping Away from the Brink of Nuclear War
For Kim Yong Un to give up his nuclear weapons, while we keep ours and have announced that we intend to overthrow his regime, would be tantamount to his committing suicide. He may be evil, as many believe, but there is no reason to believe that he is a fool…    Thus, there can be no “success,” as described in current policy statements by the Trump administration. But, arrangements can be created – by enlisting China and Russia as partners in negotiations and by renouncing threats and such damaging (and ineffective) policies as sanctions – to gradually create an atmosphere in which North Korea can be accepted as a partner in the nuclear “club.”   …If the United States government should decide to try this option, I think the following steps will have to be taken to start negotiations:  First, the U.S. government must accept the fact that North Korea is a nuclear power;  Second, it must commit itself formally and irrevocably to a no-first-strike policy. That was the policy envisaged by the Founding Fathers when they denied the chief executive the power to initiate aggressive war;  Third, it must remove sanctions on North Korea and begin to offer in a phased pattern aid to mitigate the current (and potentially future) famines caused by droughts and crop failures; helping North Korea to move toward prosperity, and reducing fear; and  Fourth, stop issuing threats and drop the unproductive and provocative war games on the DMZ.   More

When It Comes to the War in the Greater Middle East, Maybe We're the Bad Guys
Perhaps it’s time to ask whether the United States is really playing the role of the positive protagonist in a great global drama…  Certainly, it’s not the side of the average Arab.  That should be apparent.  Take a good, hard look at the region and it’s obvious that Washington mainly supports the interests of Israel, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Egypt’s military dictator, and various Gulf State autocracies. Or consider the actions and statements of the Trump administration and of the two administrations that preceded it and here’s what seems obvious: the United States is in many ways little more than an air force, military trainer, and weapons depot for assorted Sunni despots…  After Israel, Egypt is the number two recipient of direct U.S. military aid, to the tune of $1.3 billion annually.  And that bedrock of liberal values is led by U.S.-trained General Abdul el-Sisi, a strongman who seized power in a coup and then, just for good measure, had his army gun down a crowd demonstrating in favor of the deposed democratically elected president.   More

The U.S. Is in Denial About the Civilians It’s Killing in Syria
The number of civilians killed by the U.S.-led coalition assault on the Islamic State’s de facto capital in Syria is mounting, but the coalition’s commanding general has cast doubt on the toll his forces are inflicting on innocents there. The monitoring group Airwars currently assesses that 1,700 or more civilians have likely been killed by U.S.-led air and artillery strikes in Raqqa governorate since March. A minimum of 860 civilians, including 150 children, are credibly reported to have been killed in Raqqa since the official start of operations to capture the city on June 6.  Despite these findings and corroborating evidence from U.N. bodies and nongovernmental organizations, Lt. Gen. Stephen J. Townsend has described reports of large-scale civilian death as hyperbole. In one instance, the general prematurely called allegations not credible even before the coalition had completed its own investigation.    More

In Boston-DORCHESTER STANDOUT FOR BLACK LIVES Thursday September 21, 5:30-6:30 PM at Ashmont T station

Come to the next monthly 
DORCHESTER STANDOUT FOR BLACK LIVES
Thursday September 215:30-6:30 PM 
(and the third Thursday of every month)
at Ashmont T station plaza


Kelley writes:
The expressions of racist hatred and the murder in Charlottesville, and the reactions by the president heightened the sense that an August Standout for Black Lives was seriously needed. The addition of twenty new participants, along with two canine comrades, Sophie and Eli, as well as a number of very young sign holders, reflected that these feelings were widely shared. The horns beeping in support of the banner declaring that "We believe Black Lives Matter" have multiplied each month (even MBTA buses). This month we also had an influx of new people from the neighborhood as well as the continued support from Veterans for Peace, First Parish Church, Milton for Peace and folks from the Jamaica Plain vigil. It is a congenial atmosphere in which we are making a visible public statement about our opposition to racism. Thanks to all who came (especially the gentleman who brings us free food) and we welcome anyone interested in joining us next month. 

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact Kelley, kelready@msn.com or Becky, beckyp44@verizon.net, or call Dorchester People for Peace 617-282-3783


Veterans Call for De-escalation, Negotiations, and Peace on the Korean Peninsula

Veterans Call for De-escalation, Negotiations, and Peace on the Korean Peninsula

Veterans For Peace, a U.S. based organization with international chapters in Japan and Okinawa, calls on the governmental leaders of the U.S., the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, aka North Korea), the Republic of Korea (ROK, aka South Korea) and Japan to stop their escalation of threatening words and actions, and begin negotiations toward the signing of the long-awaited Peace Treaty putting a final end to the Korean War.
Any attempt to solve the issues dividing the Korean Peninsula by warfare would bring disaster not only to the people living there, but also to all the people living in Northeast Asia. 
Retired General Gary Luck, Former Commander of U.S. Forces in Korea, has estimated that such a war would leave one million dead.  And what would be the aim of this war?  Each side is threatening to make war on the other to punish it for threatening to make war.  This is the behavior of schoolyard bullies, armed not with knives and clubs but nuclear weapons.  This catastrophic war is avoidable, and must be avoided.
In understanding the background to this situation, it should be remembered that the DPRK has been under nuclear threat from the U.S. ever since the Korean War in the 1950s. That their government has in recent years taken to threatening nuclear retaliation to any attacker is a wildly dangerous and morally condemnable policy, but it is not unique to the DPRK.  It is a policy, invented by the U.S. and adopted by every country that possesses nuclear weapons, called “nuclear deterrence”.  Every criticism heaped upon the DPRK for following this policy applies equally to every country possessing nuclear weapons.
Each year the U.S. and the ROK carry out joint military exercises right up against the DPRK border, and based on the scenario of an invasion of that country. 
Every year the DPRK, which unsurprisingly considers this a threat, protests with verbal counter-threats and, recently, missile launchings. 
This year, the U.S. and Japan carried out joint military exercises at the same time as the U.S.-ROK exercises. Rhetoric has escalated. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened “fire and fury like the world has never seen”, and stated that “all options are on the table”, which means a pre-emptive strike is being considered.  DPRK leader Kim Jong Un threatened to launch missiles aimed at the vicinity of Guam.  Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe threatened to send Japan’s Self Defense Forces along with any U.S.  invasion of the North, which would spell the final end of Japan’s Peace Constitution.  Kim Jong Un responded by sending a missile over northern Japan – though not, as was claimed, violating Japan’s airspace, as when it passed over Japan it was in outer space, at an elevation even higher than that of the many satellites that legally pass over Japan every day.
Prime Minister Abe, however, took advantage of the situation by calling a state of emergency in northern Japan, commandeering the national broadcasting system NHK, and also the cell-phone system, to urge people take shelter from the alleged impending attack by moving to the basements of concrete buildings (few buildings have these). Presumably Abe is hoping that the resulting panic will help him to promote his militarization plans, and in particular to gain support for his purchases of expensive counter-missile commodities. (It is noteworthy that during this “state of emergency” the trains, including the bullet trains, were kept running.)
This gambling with the lives of millions has got to stop.  And there is a way to stop it.  DPRK, while carrying out its threatening nuclear tests and missile launchings, has repeatedly said it wants to negotiate a peace treaty ending the Korean War, which the U.S. has been refusing.  But a peace treaty is a very good idea, the signing of which would allow the many hundreds of millions of people living in Northeast Asia to breathe a sigh of relief.  Veterans For Peace calls on the U.S. Government to accept this offer, and to begin negotiations with the DPRK aiming at signing such a treaty and normalizing relations between the DPRK and the ROK.
And as the governments of the relevant countries seem locked into their present self-destructive policies, we call upon the citizens of those countries, who surely do not want a meaningless nuclear war where they live, to demand that their governments back off and begin negotiations, which are the only way to bring peace to the region.
Written by Veterans For Peace, VFP Japan and Okinawa VFP

En Boston-REMINDER-RECORDATORIO encuentro5 Peña Invitation/invitación a la Peña del encuentro5 In Solidarity with America Latina Independence/En Solidaridad Con Independencia de America Latina

----- Forwarded Message -----

Join us at the encuentro5 Peña to commemorate and celebrate the anniversaries of independence of America Latina and in solidarity with its Peoples’ resistance and movements for economic liberation/ Únase a nosotros en la Peña del encuentro5 para conmemorar y celebrar los aniversarios de independencia de América Latina, y en solidaridad con sus Movimientos Populares de resistencia y liberación económica.

Saturday September 9, 2017 7:pm - 11:pm-- sábado 9 de septiembre del 2017 7’11ñpm
9A Hamilton Place across from Park St. train station (Green-Red lines) and next to Orpheum Theater/ acruzar de la estación de tren Park St. (lineas roja-verde= y alado del teatro Orpheum

To view flyer/para ver volante http://encuentro5.org/home/

In this month of September nations from America Latina are commemorating and celebrating anniversaries of their independence (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Chile and Mexico), however, the economic oppression resulting from imperialist endeavors such as trade agreements and agribusiness instituted by former colonizers continue to create economic crises. A response to these crises has been to organize an economic liberation movement for auto determination while building a new and better world with no colonies, no borders are fueling people's movements. Examples of economic, imperialist and colonial oppression are Puerto Rico still a colony of the USNA (united states of north america) and the democratically elected government of Venezuela is under attack by opposing right wing forces.

Long live the Bolivarian Revolution!

En e este mes de septiembre, naciones de América Latina conmemoran y celebran aniversarios de sus independencia (Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Chile y México). la opresión económica resultante de esfuerzos imperialistas tales como acuerdos comerciales y agro negocios instituida por pasados colonizadores continúan creando crisis económicas. Una respuesta a estas crisis ha sido organizar un movimiento de liberación económica para la autodeterminación mientras se construye un mundo nuevo y mejor sin colonias, sin fronteras. Estos esfuerzos están inspirando movimientos populares. Ejemplos de opresión económica, imperialista y colonial son Puerto Rico todavía una colonia de la USNA (estados unidos de norte america) y los ataques iniciado por la o p osición derechista. sobre el gobierno
democráticamente elegido de Venezuela.

¡Que viva la Revolución Bolivariana!
_______________________________________________
Act-MA mailing list
Act-MA@act-ma.org
http://act-ma.org/mailman/listinfo/act-ma_act-ma.org
To set options or unsubscribe
http://act-ma.org/mailman/options/act-ma_act-ma.org

On The 150th Anniversary Of Marx's "Das Capital"-"Slavery, Plunder and the Rise of Capitalism"

On The 150th Anniversary Of Marx's "Das Capital"-"Slavery, Plunder and the Rise of Capitalism"



Workers Vanguard No. 1116
25 August 2017
TROTSKY
LENIN
Slavery, Plunder and the Rise of Capitalism
(Quote of the Week)
This year marks the 150th anniversary of the publication of the first volume of Karl Marx’s seminal work, Capital, in which he laid bare the workings of the capitalist mode of production. In the excerpts below, Marx explains the key role that slavery, pillage and conquest played in the primitive accumulation of capital by the European powers.
The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins, signalised the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production. These idyllic proceedings are the chief momenta of primitive accumulation. On their heels treads the commercial war of the European nations, with the globe for a theatre....
The colonies secured a market for the budding manufactures, and, through the monopoly of the market, an increased accumulation. The treasures captured outside Europe by undisguised looting, enslavement, and murder, floated back to the mother-country and were there turned into capital....
Whilst the cotton industry introduced child slavery in England, it gave in the United States a stimulus to the transformation of the earlier, more or less patriarchal slavery, into a system of commercial exploitation. In fact, the veiled slavery of the wage workers in Europe needed, for its pedestal, slavery pure and simple in the new world.
Tantae molis erat [so great was the effort required], to establish the “eternal laws of Nature” of the capitalist mode of production, to complete the process of separation between labourers and conditions of labour, to transform, at one pole, the social means of production and subsistence into capital, at the opposite pole, the mass of the population into wage labourers, into “free labouring poor,” that artificial product of modern society. If money, according to Augier, “comes into the world with a congenital blood-stain on one cheek,” capital comes dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt.
—Karl Marx, Capital, Volume I (1867)

A View From The Left-For Labor/Black Mobilizations to Stop the Fascists!-Build The Anti-Fascist United Front






[Frank Jackman comment September 9, 2017: on a number of ocassions I have stated in this space thta I place some material here from other generally left-wing perspectives without comment that the liberaland radical public might be interested in. I have also noted that some material does not get placed here if I think it is off-the-wall or just weird (which seldom happens as it turns out from a look at past practice.   

Somtimes and here is one of them I stand in solidarity with the piece posted. If have placed a post related to this same issue as a sort of solidarity introduction refelcting my own views.]  

In The Aftermath Of Charlottesville-Remember The 1960s Freedom Riders And You Will Understand Why We Hate The KKK (and their ilk on the Alt-Right)

Frank Jackman comment:
  
I have just spent the weekend making myself hoarse, once again, over the issue of “free speech for White Nationalists, Nazis, KKK, Alt-Right and whatever other para-military operations work under the assumption that “history is on their side.” (I will use the term Alt-Right hereafter as the generic expression for this right-wing rabble.) On their side programmatically with their calls for race war, ethnic cleansing, genocide and political atomization and destruction of any political opposition. Hell any opposition at all under the premise that if you are not with me then you are against me (somewhat the way their “fifth columnist” President Trump operates in his universe). The reason for the hoarse throat was my attendance at the hugely successful counter-protest to the tiny “free speech” rally at the Parkman Bandstand on the Boston Common put on by the Alt-Right. (Hugely successful as the first in probably a long line of protests and other actions by being well-organized unlike Charlottesville where the Alt-Right out organized the counter-protesters and showing a strong sense of solidarity with the anti-fascist united front being formed now).             

I had mentioned in a series of pieces advertising the counter-protest on Saturday August 19, 2017 on the Common that a number of issues had to be clarified and thought through about how to best fight the emerging Alt-Right threat. In short to examine and learn from the lessons of history. The first, and for right now, the key issue is to understand the “enemy” and its program. That entails further understanding that no self-respecting anti-fascist activist should even consider defending the Alt-Right’s right to free speech as a measure of elementary political hygiene. We of the anti-fascist resistance are under no obligation to accept the Alt-Right’s fiction of covering their hate rallies within the umbrella of free speech. The potentially murderous armed demonstration in Charlottesville should disabuse anybody of that notion.

More importantly and this is where I began to get some headway in my argument against defending “free speech” for the Alt-Right is the program these organizations espouse. These are not merely bad ideas floating out in the political biosphere like getting rid of Obamacare or in some academic debating setting. The logic and aim of their programs for a “white nation” can only mean race war, genocide, ethnic cleansing and political destruction of the opposition. Free speech leads to the concentration camps if they get their way. They will have, and do not now have, any qualms about denying us our rights, including free speech wherever they can get the upper-hand.

All of the above comments got a rather concise exploration early Sunday morning when I happened to be travelling for a meeting early and had the BBC on the radio. Early Sunday morning they have a Bit of History show on. This particular show dealt with the heroic civil rights freedom riders of the early 1960s in the American South trying to desegregate interstate transportation-the buses, trains, and other facilities connected with interstate transportation. The commentary that stopped me in my tracks was the story related by one of the early leaders about when they got to Anniston, Alabama and met up with some rabble who were intent on murder, had tried to set the bus they were riding on fire and holding the doors closed. Only a late intervention by a previously standing-by policeman saved them. That is the program we have to look forward to if we don’t stop this rabble in the egg. No free speech for Nazis, KKK and their ilk.                  


Workers Vanguard No. 1116
25 August 2017
 
Fascist Killers Strike in Charlottesville
For Labor/Black Mobilizations to Stop the Fascists!
AUGUST 21—As the August 17 Spartacist League statement printed below underlines, the growing outrage against the fascists needs an organized expression based on mobilizing the social power of the multiracial working class. The day after we issued the statement, we learned that Local 10 of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) in the Bay Area had unanimously passed a resolution on August 17 calling for the union to march against a fascist rally in San Francisco’s Crissy Field on August 26. The motion resolved to “march to Crissy Field to stop the racist, fascist intimidation in our hometown and invite all unions and antiracist and antifascist organizations to join us.”
We welcome this call. Other unions and all opponents of racist terror should mobilize with the ILWU on August 26! The Spartacist League and the Partisan Defense Committee will be mobilizing a contingent emphasizing that for labor to bring its power to bear against the fascist terror gangs, it must be mobilized on the basis of its own independent strength—not as an adjunct to the Democratic Party politicians who are trying to get the fascist rally banned by the federal government. Unfortunately, the Local 10 leadership is pushing the efforts of the Democratic Party administration of San Francisco and Democratic Congressional leader Nancy Pelosi to get the rally banned, with Local 10 president Ed Ferris telling KPFK on August 18, “I am hopeful that they’ll just deny this permit.”
As we warn in our statement: “Don’t buy into the delusion that the capitalist state is going to protect you against the fascists! Its cops are the central perpetrators of violence against black people and the oppressed in this society. State bans on the fascists can and will be used against the left and any perceived opponent of the capitalist state, its cops, courts, prisons and military.” It is precisely the trade-union bureaucracy’s reliance on the “benevolence” of the state of the capitalist class enemy and its subservience to the Democratic Party that has for decades sapped the power of labor, setting the stage for the devastation of wages, benefits and working conditions.
With consummate hypocrisy, Pelosi denounced the fascists in Charlottesville, declaring, “The perpetrators of this violence insult our fundamental American values.” Racial oppression and the brutal subjugation of black people at the bottom of society are the cornerstones of the American capitalist order. And that order—with its routine violence against working people and the oppressed at home and its imperialist atrocities against the masses of the world—is administered and enforced by the Democrats as well as the Republicans.
As Jeffrey St. Clair aptly put it, the U.S. has “entered the time of mock outrage” (counterpunch.org, 18 August). After howling their moral indignation at Trump’s condemnation of “both sides” in Charlottesville, the Democrats and their media mouthpieces quickly turned around and are now doing the same thing. From the New York Times to the Washington Post and CNN, story after story has pointed to the “violence” of antifa activists. An editorial in the New York Daily News (20 August) calls on “calmer voices on the left” to “disavow” antifa, who are denounced for “unprovoked violence” and being “bent on initiating conflict” in Charlottesville.
The purpose behind such statements is to lay the basis for even more intense state repression against anti-fascist activists. When tens of thousands came out in Boston on August 19 to protest a fascist provocation, Democratic Party mayor Marty Walsh declared, “It’s clear today that Boston stood for peace and love, not bigotry and hate.” For their part, the Boston cops attacked crowds of anti-fascist protesters and arrested at least 33 people. Drop all charges now!
The bourgeois rulers and their state are opposed to any and all manifestations of militant opposition to their decaying order. The working class must be imbued with class hatred against the capitalist exploiters and oppressors, against the parties and politicians that administer the capitalist order, against the capitalist system itself that gives birth to the fascist race-terrorists. No illusions in the capitalist state or Democratic Party! Mobilize labor/black power to stop the fascists!
*   *   *
Waving the Confederate flag of slavery and brandishing the swastika of Hitler’s Nazis, fascist stormtroopers armed with assault rifles, clubs and brass knuckles descended on Charlottesville, Virginia, last weekend. They came looking for blood and they got it. Heather Heyer, a 32-year-old woman who had come out to protest these racist terrorists, was murdered by a Nazi-lover who drove his car at high speed into a group of anti-fascists. Nineteen of the many others who were hit were hospitalized, some with critical injuries. A black hip-hop artist, Deandre Harris, had his skull cracked open by a club-wielding gang of fascist thugs. The night before, a torchlight parade of hundreds of white-supremacists chanting, “You will not replace us,” “Jews will not replace us” and the Nazi slogan “blood and soil” marched onto the University of Virginia campus and surrounded and pummeled a small group of young protesters who were chanting “black lives matter.”
The fascists are the shock troops for racist genocide—the creation of an all-white America where black people, immigrants, Jews, Muslims and other minorities do not exist. This program was written in the blood of Charlottesville. Would-be führer Richard Spencer boasts of scoring a “moral victory in terms of a show of force.” Matthew Heimbach, leader of the Traditionalist Worker Party—whose thugs stabbed, slashed and clubbed anti-fascist protesters in Sacramento last June—brags: “We achieved all of our objectives.” Emboldened, racist terror gangs are mobilizing for their next provocations in cities across the country from Boston to the Bay Area.
The guns that the fascists were carrying in Charlottesville are aimed at every black person, Latino, union militant, leftist and anyone else they see as an enemy of their drive for a “racially pure” America. Since Trump’s election, there has been an increase in racist murders, attacks and provocations. The ultimate aim of the fascists is to destroy the workers movement, including the unions and the left. It was no accident that a noose appeared twice on the Oakland docks this May, a calculated and deadly threat against the majority black longshore workforce. When the ILWU longshore workers walked off the job to protest the lynch rope, they gave a small taste of the power that must be mobilized to crush the fascists.
The outrage against the fascists needs an organized expression: a disciplined, militant and military mobilization of the social power of the multiracial working class. It is this power that is feared and hated by the bosses, their kept labor lieutenants in the trade-union bureaucracy and capitalist politicians of all colors and genders. The working class has the power and objective interest not only to stop the fascists but also to overturn the whole capitalist system that spawns these vermin. This is why the bosses keep the fascist killers in reserve, to be unleashed when the capitalist social order is threatened by an insurgent proletariat.
Republican and Democratic politicians alike are now trying to lull any outrage over Charlottesville with cynical condemnations of white supremacy and racial hatred. Beware the crocodile tears of your exploiters and oppressors! Their entire capitalist system is based on racial oppression, the increasingly brutal exploitation of labor, joblessness, poverty and starvation, and the mass murder of millions around the globe.
The bourgeois media, which has railed against antifa “extremists” who have tried to stop the fascists, now pontificates against Trump’s grotesque apologias for these racist killers. That Trump is a raving racist who has coddled and encouraged the fascists is hardly news. But what about the other representatives of American imperialist rule who are now denouncing the fascists? Former Democratic Party president Bill Clinton weighed in early with a tweet decrying the “hatred, violence and white supremacy” in Charlottesville. This from the man who rode into the Oval Office making a point of going to witness the execution of a brain-damaged black man and when in power probably did more to destroy the lives of the black working people and poor than any president since World War II. The politicians’ oceans of hypocrisy are in the service of obscuring the inherently racist nature of capitalist America.
Virginia’s Democratic Party governor, Terry McAuliffe, took to the pulpit of a black church in Charlottesville to tell the fascists to “go home” proclaiming, “You are not wanted in this great commonwealth.” Actually, Virginia was the birthplace of American slavery and the seat of the Confederacy. It took a bloody Civil War, with 200,000 black troops, guns in hand, to smash the chains of black chattel slavery. But the promise of black freedom was soon betrayed by the Northern bourgeoisie, which allied with the Southern propertied classes against the aspirations of the black freedmen. No less than the Klan terrorists that arose to suppress the newly freed slaves, the fascist gangs today seek to reverse the verdict of the Civil War.
Barack Obama, under whose reign joblessness, poverty and rampant cop terror against black people flourished, now obscenely preaches that the fascist killers “can be taught to love.” This idiotic, and ultimately suicidal, notion finds expression among black preachers and liberals, from the NAACP to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which argues that “every act of hatred should be met with an act of love and unity.” Joining this chorus of “love and unity” are the International Socialist Organization (ISO) and the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), several of whose supporters were injured in Charlottesville.
In early June, the ISO and DSA called a “Portland Stands United Against Hate” rally in response to a fascist mobilization that came on the heels of the murder of two men who had intervened to stop a racist assault on two young women—one black, one Muslim—by a white-supremacist. While gun-toting militia thugs mobilized to defend the fascists and cheered police attacks on antifa activists with chants of “blue lives matter,” those at the ISO/DSA rally were singing, “We are gentle, angry people.” A “Bay Area Rally Against Hate” is now being called several blocks away from an August 27 fascist rally in downtown Berkeley. Advertised as a celebration of non-violence and solidarity against the white-supremacists who “try to intimidate us and incite violence,” it is promoted as an opportunity “to speak to each other about the world we want.”
No amount of singing and hand-holding in the name of non-violence is going to stop the violently racist fascist terrorists. Such actions reinforce the lie that racist terror is anathema to “American values,” serving to channel outrage against the fascist murderers into support for the “kinder, gentler” Democrats. The Democratic Party mayor of Berkeley is promising to investigate “all legal means” to shut down the fascists’ rally. Across the Bay in San Francisco, Democratic Party mayor Ed Lee and Congressional Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein are demanding that the federal government ban a rally by Patriot Prayer, the same outfit that organized the fascist provocation in June in Portland.
Don’t buy into the delusion that the capitalist state is going to protect you against the fascists! Its cops are the central perpetrators of violence against black people and the oppressed in this society. State bans on the fascists can and will be used against the left and any perceived opponent of the capitalist state, its cops, courts, prisons and military. And beware those treacherous liberals like the ACLU who go to bat for the fascists’ right to rally for genocide in the name of “free speech.” Fascism is not about speech; it is about racist terror! Every “free speech” victory the fascists score in the courts only whets their appetite for greater violence.
Nor will confrontations by small groups of anti-fascist militants stop the fascist gangs. While the antifas have demonstrated real courage and determination in action, their politics are simply the streetfighting face of liberalism and moral suasion. Incredibly, many are now saying that Charlottesville was a victory! The anarchist It’s Going Down website boasts that “anarchists and anti-fascists were in Charlottesville to shut down a nazi rally, and they did.” In fact, the Nazis successfully rallied Friday night, laying the groundwork for Saturday’s carnage, including the murder of Heather Heyer. That day, the fascists’ rally was shut down only after McAuliffe declared a state of emergency, sending in the National Guard and ordering the cops who had allowed the fascists to get away with their murderous assaults on protesters to close down the “Unite the Right” rally site. This did nothing to stem the fascists’ violence and bloodshed.
What is needed is to mobilize the class hatred of the multiracial working class. Standing at the head of all the intended victims of fascist terror, labor has the power to drive these racist thugs and killers off the streets. The idea that the union movement would flex its muscle in its own defense much less in defense of the growing ranks of the dispossessed doubtless strikes many as a utopian pipe dream. Responsibility for this can be laid squarely at the doorstep of the trade-union misleaders, who for decades have allowed the unions to be hacked to pieces while turning a blind eye to the mounting attacks against black people, immigrants, the poor and oppressed.
The labor bureaucrats’ accommodation to the rulers’ onslaught flows from their allegiance to American capitalism and to its political parties, particularly the “lesser evil” Democrats. The only “action” taken by the AFL-CIO leadership in response to Charlottesville was for its president, Richard Trumka, to resign his seat at the table with many of the wealthiest CEOs of U.S. capitalism on Trump’s manufacturing council! It is its own statement of the cravenness of the labor bureaucrats that Trumka was shamed into making this meaningless gesture by the resignation of several CEOs before him.
But there are union battalions that could have been mobilized in Charlottesville, from workers in the Norfolk shipyards to longshoremen in Southern ports. Their social power lies in the fact that their labor is essential to the functioning and profitability of American capitalism. The majority black membership of these unions in turn could have provided a critical link to mobilizing the black masses behind the power of labor in struggle against the fascists.
As we wrote in “‘Alt-Right’ Fascists: Shock Troops for Racist Genocide” (WV No. 1115, 28 July) in the lead-up to Charlottesville:
“Labor can and must be organized to smash the fascists. The potential for such action was shown in a small but real way by the labor/black mobilizations initiated by the Spartacist League and Partisan Defense Committee to stop Klan and Nazi provocations in several cities in the 1970s, ’80s and ’90s. Through flexing their muscle in massive, multiracial mobilizations against the fascists, the workers will come to recognize their power as a class. What must be done is to build a revolutionary workers party that will wield that power to finally fulfill the promise of black freedom and emancipate all the exploited and oppressed. It will take nothing less than a third, socialist American Revolution to break the chains of racist capitalist rule and bury the fascist gangs for good. For labor/black action to stop the fascists!

The Battle Of The Titians-Ernest Hemingway’s “The Sun Also Rises” Vs. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “This Side Of Paradise”

The Battle Of The Titians-Ernest Hemingway’s “The Sun Also Rises” Vs. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “This Side Of Paradise” 








By Zack James


No question as Josh Breslin has seemingly gracelessly aged he has become more perverse in his greedy little mind. That trait has exploded more recently as he has finally hung up his pen and paper if one can do such a feat and stopped writing free-lance articles for half the small press, small publishing house, small artsy journal nation. All this hubbub boiled over recently when he told his old friend from his growing up in Riverdale days, Sam Lowell, about his “coup,” his term, in upsetting the applecart of the American literary pantheon by claiming on very flimsy evidence that F. Scott Fitzgerald’s early work, the one that gave him his first fame, This Side Of Paradise, could be compared with his masterwork The Great Gatsby. The perverse part came when he told Sam that he had only  written the article as a send-up of all the literary set’s fretting about who and what works belong in, or don’t belong in, the pantheon also based on as very little evidence.       

The whole faux dust-up came up because now that he was retired he could write a little more freely since he had neither the pressure of some midnight deadline from some nervous nelly editor waiting impatiently for him to dot that last i before rushing off to the printer nor the imperative of reining in his horns to insure that he could keep up with the gathering payments for alimony, child support and college educations for a three ex-wives and a slew of well-behaved kids. The latter being a close thing that almost broke his spirit. He had accepted a free-lance at-your-leisure assignment from Ben Gold, the editor of the Literary Gazette, who told him he could write a monthly column on some topic that interested him. As long as it was about three thousand words and not the usual five or six thousand that had to be edited with scalpel in hand and arguments every other line about its worthiness as part of the article.         

Josh admitted to Sam that he was intrigued by the idea and after thinking about the matter for a while decided that he would concentrate on reviewing for a 21st century audience some of the American masterworks of the 20th century. The beauty of this idea was that he would no longer have to face the dagger-eyed living authors, their hangers-on and acolytes every time he noted that said authors couldn’t write themselves a proper thank you note never mind such a huge task as writing a well-thought out novel that they had forced him mercilessly to review the relatively few times he entered the literary fray. He had made his mark in the cultural field by reviewing music and film mostly but would when hard up for dollars for those aforementioned three wives and slew of hungry kids take on anything including writing bogus reviews of various products like dish detergent and mouthwash although more recently a spade of reviews on technical gadgets like things for computers which he frankly didn’t know or give a fuck about. Couldn’t even figure out how to attach the damn things to the computer. Now he could leisurely delve back into the past and cherry-pick a few bright objects, write a few thousand words and move onto the next selection.

Or so he thought. Josh had made Sam laugh, had made himself laugh as well, one night when they were at Sam’s favorite watering hole, Teddy Green’s Grille over Lyons Street in their old hometown after he had finished and Ben had published his first “thought” article in the Gazette. He had admitted that his take on the issue was perverse, was a low-intensity tweaking of all those in the literary racket who labored long, hard, and winded to specialize in “deconstructing” some famous author in order to make hay in their own bailiwicks, making their own cramped careers out of the literary mass of real writers. He had stirred up the hornet’s nest by his “innocent” comparison of the two Fitzgerald works.                 

Josh told Sam that he had been rather naïve to think that the literary gurus would take his little heresy as mere grumbling of an old man and pass it off as so much blather. He had reasoned that one could get passionate about who would win the World Series or the Super Bowl, one political candidate over another, some worthy cause but that the almost one hundred year old vintage of a couple of books set in the Jazz Age 1920s by a now unfashionable “dead white man” author long since, very long    since, dead should be passed in silence. Not so. No sooner had the Gazette come out than some silly undergraduate English major had e-mailed Josh about how wrong he was to compare the “juvenile antics,” her term, of privileged white college boy Amory Blaine over up from nowhere strivings after fame and fortune of one Jay Gatsby when all the old-time money and position was against him. Of course he had had to defend his position and sent her a return e-mail summarily dismissing her championship as so much sophomoric half-thinking “politically correct” classist claptrap that has overrun the college campuses over the past decades, mostly not for the better.  

End of debate. No way since thereafter a couple of academic heavyweights, known Fitzgerald scholars, had to put their two cents worth in since an intruder was invading their turf, an odd-ball free-lance music and film critic well past his prime according to one of their kind as if he himself had not been pan-handling the same half dozen admitted good ideas for the previous forty years since he had gotten tenure. In any case no sooner had that undergraduate student dust-up settled down than Professor Lord, the big-time retired English teacher from Harvard whose books of literary criticism set many a wannabe writers’ hearts a-flutter took up the cudgels in defense of Gatsby.

Pointed out to ignorant Josh that  the novel was an authentic slice of life about the American scene in the scattershot post-World War I scene and that Paradise was nothing but the well-written but almost non-literary effort of an aspiring young author telling, retailing was the word the good professor used, his rather pedestrian and totally conventional youth-based comments. Those sentiments in turn got Professor Jamison, the well-known Fitzgerald scholar from Princeton, Scott’s old school, in a huff about how the novel represented the Jazz Age from a younger more innocent perspective as well as Gatsby had done for the older free-falling set who had graduated from proms and social dances to country club and New York Plaza Hotel intrigues. So the battle raged.   

Josh laughed loudest as the heavy-weights from the academy went slamming into the night and into each other’s bailiwicks and stepped right to the sidelines once he had started his little fireball rolling. Laughed harder when he, having had a few too many scotches at his own  favorite watering hole, Jack’s outside Harvard Square, thought about the uproar he would create when he tweaked a few noses declaring Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises as the definite Jazz Age novel and put Gatsby in the bereft dime store novel category by comparison.


It was that idea that Josh wanted to use Sam as a sounding board for, a guy to tussle out the pieces with. After Josh had received the response that he did from well-paid hucksters in the academy to the first article in his monthly column he decided to change tack and actually act as a provocateur, a flame-thrower, and rather than placid kind of educational pieces he would go slightly off-the-wall dragging some of those in the literary pantheon through the mud. So that throwaway idea of pitting two titans like Hemingway and Fitzgerald together to fight mano a mano for kingpin of the Jazz Age literary set began to geminate as the fodder for the next article for his column. Hence, Sam, Sam as devils’ advocate, since Josh and he had had many go arounds over literary subjects ever since they were in high school English classes together. Watch for the bloodless blather from the literati on that one when he gets done.