Saturday, November 17, 2018

Will Bradley-The Legend-Slayer Rises Like Phoenix From The Ashes To Again Bring A Fake Legend Low-And Then Some-Errol Flynn’s “Captain Blood” (1935)-A Film Review-Of Sorts


Will Bradley-The Legend-Slayer Rises Like Phoenix From The Ashes To Again Bring A Fake Legend Low-And Then Some-Errol Flynn’s “Captain Blood” (1935)-A Film Review-Of Sorts



DVD Review

By Will Bradley     

Captain Blood, starring Errol Flynn, Olivia de Haviland, Basil Rathbone at the start of his career as the master criminal plaguing London during his reign of terror under the cover profession and name of private detective Sherlock Holmes, 1935

I expected once I started on this campaign to defrock various undeserved legends, hell, maybe legends in general and let people deal with sordid reality straight up to get some push-back from various special interest groups who have some reason, usually known only to them, to keep their particular legends alive and well. Certainly today we can add, starting in the White House, those who have a stake in “alternate facts,” formerly known as lies, that increasing mass who believe in angels, fairies (not gays), and the like.

I would have expected plenty of push-back from those myriad Robin Hood devotees who still believe the old wives’ tale about “giving to the poor” while Hood amassed a fortune in land and metals in his time what today would be the envy of any billionaire. Some poor soul tried, unsuccessfully and by himself since nobody joined him, to claim the estate records had been “doctored” by who he did not say but I believe that he is now under sedation and therefore not a threat to those who have come to realize we need no armed robbery bandits from Hood to Pretty Boy Floyd to Pretty James Preston to grab what is rightfully ours. The legend of the so-called great Spanish lover, one Don Juan, real name Jose Romero, having been created in the fevered imagination of some convent-bound young matron which spread like wild fire among the virginal set in the long chain of convents which that benighted, still benighted, country has in excess found no modern champion to dispute the facts. The hard Inquisition facts paid in torture and blood by those who ran afoul of the bastards but who kept very good records of their evil doings. Ditto one Casanova who was merely a figment of the distorted imagination of one Georgios Casanova, a second-rate painter who lost his grip on reality, which set off another set of young ladies, supposedly Enlightenment-bred young ladies, to run the rumor mill night and day. Damn puberty.              

A couple of more up to date legends proved thornier to prove but also were left hanging when no knight in armor came to defend their so-called exploits. Sadly one, a guy named Jose Rios, who claimed to be Zorro, the people’s defender was nothing but the figment of the crazed imaginations of a fistful of starving, ill-treated peasants out California way in the days before the Republic, did have a defender right in this publication. Old-timer Si Lannon got all weepy about his hidden past, or rather his mother’s as a Latina and not an Italian the way she was passed off by his father and family. Si is now writing feverish positive film reviews about the latest round of Marvel/DC comics super-heroes. Enough said.

Of course the hardest debunking, the legend that made me a legend-slayer of the first order was when I tangled with fellow writer here Seth Garth over one Sherlock Holmes, aka Lawrence Livermore. Yes, that Seth Garth who between this publication and American Film Gazette won many awards for his insightful pieces on everything from the Summer of Love in 1967 to his masterful tribute to his fallen hometown friend Pete Markin. On that one though we were tangling through different views of the fraudulent legend not trying to resuscitate some eclipsed reputation. Seth went off the beam with his silly assertions that Holmes and his boyfriend, a guy named Nigel Bruce, obviously an alias were doing their nefarious deeds as agents of some international Homintern. After a mammoth struggle my view, backed-up by Scotland Yard arrests proved that the central truth was that Larry and Nigel were running every sordid scheme from drugs to women to heists in greater London to amass their own fortunes. Even a group of devotees, acolytes, aficionados named implausibly the Baker Street Irregulars after an initial tepid defense collapsed as the indictments of Larry and Nigel came cascading in. Elementary, indeed.

Which brings me to the Johnny Cielo case in which his lingering devotees have raised a major counter-offensive defending that fraud’s so-called reputation as a key player in the development of aviation, of Icarus’ dreams. They have gracelessly conceded that Johnny was not at Kitty Hawk with Orville and Wilbur since he was not born until 1909 but have made some lame argument that he had been there in spirit. They also with a bit more grace conceded that he was not the founder of Trans-World Airline (now long- gone TWA of Howard Hughes fame) and had been something less that the leading “barnstormer” getting the mail through in various perilous countries like Barranca down in treacherous Central America where mountains grow big and the passageways narrow.    

What they have remained adamant about center on two fatal to his legend points. One that Johnny lured drop-dead beautiful Rita Hayworth, my grandfather’s and apparently every other military man’s favorite pin-up during World War II, down to Barranca to share his fate and forgo her budding film career. The other that he died heroically supplying Fidel, Fidel Castro, and his band of brothers, down in Cuba with guns and supplies after crashing in the Caribbean on his last flight. Some things diehard but I have plenty of proof that Johnny never brought Rita down south but rather a hooker, a whore, he met in Key West who looked a lot like her but whose grasp of proper English was wanting. Moreover, this Rita-look alike ran out on him with some cargo pilot once his money ran out. I might add the time frame was all wrong for Johnny’s fraudulent claim since Ms. Hayworth was then being courted by none other the Aga Khan. As for that heroic Fidel business that was easily disposed of since we have the flight manifest. Johnny did go to sleep with the fishes as they say but in the Gulf of Mexico when he stupidly ran out of fuel on his normal Key West to Naples tourist passenger run. I know this will not hold Johnny’s diehard devotees but those are the facts, Jack.

Now finally to the current legend to be slain, that of one Peter Blood, aka, Doctor Blood, Captain Blood, Peter X, Pirate Jenny, Johnny Blade and who knows a half dozen other names. His claim to fame, if you forget that bogus doctoring stuff, where he caused the death of more than one man who actually believed that an itinerant Irishman navvy could cure anything more than ingrown toenail or that he escaped from indentured servitude to lead his fellow prisoners out of servitude and into the high society life of piracy and brigandage, was that he saved Jamaica for one William of Orange, aka William I who along with his wife Mary ruled England after they got rid of King James who was a closet Catholic and general bastard and sent him into French exile.        

The real story? Well this is the hardest one of all since pirates, you heard me, pirates while stocking up with ill-gotten treasure did not leave many records around. (The so-called covenant Blood and his fellow brigands, if that is what they were, agreed to had been a mishmash of unpublishable John Locke writings with maybe a little Thomas Hobbes for good measure hardly worthy of the word covenant).  All we know is that he was a key leader of Monmouth’s rebellion in Coventry, got caught, finked on his fellow conspirators in the hope of getting in King James good graces and obtain a pardon and nevertheless was scheduled to hang since the king was in ill-humor that day. (By the way that Monmouth alliance was paved with pure gold, plenty of it, which we shall see is the nexus for everything this bum Blood did, including with his women.) Somebody got the bright idea to send the lot to Jamaica to sweat and die in the sugar cane fields for the mercenary landowners who plagued that isle. The King was in good-humor that day so off the lot went.     

This is where the Peter X part comes in since we know from the manifest of HMS Anne that he was aboard when the ship docked in Port Royal. He wound up according to the bill of sale being sold to some young female member of one of the leading landowner’s entourage, one Aria Bishop, something like that to serve her in whatever way she wanted, probably in some bed or other. The X part came in because he refused to give his last name and because he could not write so Peter X it was. (That last piece of information should clue us in that he was no doctor even though in those days you did not need to go to Harvard Medical School to practice and that covenant was another one of those so-called democratic examples that have made his fans, hopefully after this expose dwindling clot of fans, made of pure clothe and which those same fans have touted as Blood being a direct precursor of the American revolutionaries in 1776-bullshit)              

After Aria used Mr. X up, moved on to some other felon since she seemed to have a predilection for the type, especially pirates, he started plotting his escape, his exile he called it. This part is true enough and commendable except the price of his freedom was the betrayal of his fellow slaves, let’s call them what they really were, to one Colonel Bishop, Aria’s protector since it was him or them. All the noise about band of brothers was so much hot air with that crowd, it was later when he would foist that democratic stuff when he got to the Tortugas and picked up a mixed crew of ruffians and kill-crazy maniacs. This motley crew, this turn to sweet piracy is when we first hear him referred to as Captain Blood, and not always with honor since he was final court of judgement among that crew he gathered to rape and pillage whatever was not tied down, and even some stuff that was.      

The Captain Blood legend has it that he went to sea many times and grabbed whatever he fancied from whatever flag a ship was flying and that eventually when William with that Mary hanging onto him for dear life kicked King James’ ass out of England he was to become the big cheese in the Caribbean and maybe further afield. Like some wily and wary Dutchman was going to let a fugitive, a slave, a pirate run the colonial operations of the Empire. Jesus some people really are gullible and get what they deserve.  

The real deal is that Peter, let’s call him that rather than that bogus Captain thing he ran around with for a while never ran out to sea, got according to the slim colonial medical records seasick every time (apparently the passage over from England when he got his reprieve was a nightmare for his fellows). He had a guy, a Frenchman met in the Tortugas, named Basil Rathbone, something like that run the sea-borne operations while he sat in the Black Swan Tavern and drank his rum and had his way with whatever women he desired. Some poor Cambridge graduate looking for adventure ran into him down there and bought his whole line of baloney, brought it back to London and that was the start of a now four centuries old lie. Yeah, another legend bites the dust.    

Legendary Marvel Comic Book Illustrator And Super-Hero Creator Stan Lee Passes At 95


Legendary Marvel Comic Book Illustrator And Super-Hero Creator Stan Lee Passes At 95




By Seth Garth

Greg Green has asked me to make comment on the passing of legendary Marvel Comic illustrator and innovative super-hero creator (think Hulk, Captain America, Black Panther) Stan Lee at 95. He said he was in a quandary about asking anybody to do the piece since he had been the one who in 2017 had the writers here, young and old alike, do film reviews of Marvel and DC Comic characters as they hit the screen. This as part of what I think was asserting his authority when he took over the day to day operations of the publication as site manager after a bloody internal battle pitting young against old which resulted in the previous manager being purged and sent into exile. This frankly hare-brained scheme was Greg’s notion of “broadening our horizons,” or some such thing in order to reach a younger demographic. Both young and old writers rebelled against this dictate and more importantly the reader base which is heavily composed of baby-boomers did as well. If Greg, and
I won’t go on and go about his grievous error since we have bloodied the pages on this subject already, has thought to ask any writer, young or old, about what drives the youngsters to the cinema to see these gaggles of super-heroes doing their action a minute stuff against bad guys he would have known that they do not read so-called high brow film reviews in baby-boomer oriented publications. Don’t read at all or not much when the Internet will instantly spoon-feed them whatever they need to know. But enough.            
I don’t know much about Stan Lee except as he became a more known figure in the comic book world it was clear he was a max daddy innovator, a guy who could create super-heroes however misshapen and loaded with super-human powers had some human qualities that an average kid or older aficionado could hang onto. And maybe that is his legacy, the kindness and the thought behind his creations which were reflected more fully I think in the comic books rather than the films with the action a minute scenarios which seemed too implausible to dwell on. If the doing no harm in the real world and providing some easy leisure time reading as I did for me as a kid despite not knowing he created many of the characters s then that says enough. RIP, Stan Lee, RIP.      

Crossing The Color Line-When It Counted-Baseball’s Jackie Robinson Story-Chadwick Boseman’s “42”-(2013)-A Film Review

Crossing The Color Line-When It Counted-Baseball’s Jackie Robinson Story-Chadwick Boseman’s “42”-(2013)-A Film Review



DVD Review

By Laura Perkins

42, starring Chadwick Boseman, Harrison Ford, 2013

Although the number of female sports reporters, including anchors and such, has grown exponentially since my pre-Title X in college days I admit I have never been a sports fan, never really followed, seriously followed in any case, the subject of the film under review, 42, baseball. Except to vicariously root for the New York Yankees whenever they raised their heads come World Serious times since I grew up around Albany in New York (that “World Serious” expression courtesy of Ring Larner via his You Know Me, Al stories via Sam Lowell who was, is a baseball nut). That rooting for the Yankees a not unimportant factor in the lives of both Sam and I since we have been long time companions and Sam growing up in North Adamsville south of Boston a rabid Red Sox fan which has led to many an “armed truce” come rivalry time. (I was experienced in “armed truces” well before meeting Sam many years ago since Albany is a “divided” city, or at least my clan was, is between loyalty to Yankees and Sox).   

Since I am not a baseball fan, as defined by Sam and many others-meaning knowing all kinds of arcane information about every aspect of the game how do I wind up getting this assignment. Well let’s get back to Sam, that well-known long- time companion who as film editor here back a few years before he retired would routinely do the sport films as they came up like the film adaptation of Bernard Malamud’s The Natural starring Robert Redford. Sam and I wound up watching this film not under the baseball hook but under my long-time “crush” on Harrison Ford ever since early Star Wars and my interest in seeing Chadwick Bozeman who plays Number 42, Jackie Robinson in something other than comic book super-hero Black Panther.  

After watching the film, as is our wont, Sam’s old-time expression, we discussed the merits of the film. That is where I made my “fatal” mistake. I told Sam who was awash in the glory of seeing the first black man in major league baseball (not capitalized as now) when major league baseball really was the king of the American pastime day-and later night when the lights came. Robinson helped integrate the sport AND help win the National League pennant for Brooklyn in 1947 AND win Rookie of the Year although the film was not really about baseball. Sure that was the tag line but the real deal was how for blacks since slavery times every step forward was something like a world-historic ordeal, was fought for with blood and guts by a few and then carried on by many. Since Sam had been assigned the film by site manager Greg Green (as he would have been even under recently sacked previous site manager Allan Jackson who was a boyhood friend of Sam’s and fellow baseball nut-Red Sox version) since he told me and Greg that he would have concentrated on the sports angle and somewhat downplayed the racial angle to have me to the review in order to say what I have just said above.

Greg hemmed and hawed for a while since he also is a member in good-standing of the baseball nut fraternity and wanted to highlight the incredible athletic ability and dedication that Jackie Robinson had which he believed added greatly to his ability to withstand the racial taunts and “assorted bullshit” his term, which Robinson had to withstand that first and later seasons from those “crackers,” my term who saw the game as another white preserve. A white preserve just as later, as today for that matter, blacks and others of color have had to break the white preserve on riding buses, voting, housing, employment, education you name it. All things that whites have taken for granted and not given it another thought. I include myself in that category as well.

I will now get off my soapbox since I have said what I wanted to say about my angle on the film and give you as Sam has eternally said “the skinny” on the film some of which I have already telegraphed. Branch Rickey, played by Harrison Ford, old time good old boy talking out of the side of his mouth, owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers, later to be the Los Angeles Dodgers which some of the diehards in Brooklyn have never forgotten or forgiven, for a whole series of reasons personal, professional and business-wise which get a workout in various scenes in the film decided baseball, or at least his team needed to be integrated to be successful and to cater to the fair number of blacks who attended Dodger games. As in the case of Rosa Parks later and others Rickey did not want to get just any black but one that represented the better aspects of the black race. Up steps Jackie Robinson who was playing excellent no money baseball in Negro League dungeons in the South and who would have continued to do so if Rickey hadn’t given him a call. That decision for good or evil would drive the rest of the film except for the off-hand romance interspersed between baseball scenes between Robinson and the woman who would become his wife and mainstay Rachel.            

Obviously, Rickey, and Robinson, knew that what they were facing was a daunting task from confronting those white preserve crowds to fellow baseball players, teammates and opponents, who hated the idea to fellow baseball owners to the Jim Crow conditions which precluded blacks in the South, and in the North too but less publicly blatant from white-only facilities. The centerfold on this was Robinson’s grit on and off the field and Rickey’s drive to do the right thing. All of that gets thoroughly vetted throughout the film. Of course the great plays and the marching toward the pennant get worked in as well. Despite Sam’s thrill a minute at the baseball plays this one is a good close look at American sport in a day when football which has replaced baseball as the American pastime is knee-deep in controversy around black players and their allies “taking a knee” and putting a bright spotlight on the role of the police in the black community. What else is new.       

Happy Birthday Townes Van Zandt- In The Time Of The Time Of An Outlaw Country Music Moment- The Belfast Cowboy Rides Again Van Morrison’s “Van Morrison At The Movies”

Happy Birthday Townes Van Zandt- In The Time Of The Time Of An Outlaw Country Music Moment- The Belfast Cowboy Rides Again Van Morrison’s “Van Morrison At The Movies”




YouTube film clip of Van Morrison performing his classic Into The Mystic.


CD Review

Van Morrison At The Movies , Van Morrison, Exile Records, 2007


The basic comments here have been used, used many times, to review other Van Morrison albums from various points in his long and honorable career.

Apparently just now, although this time rather accidentally, I am on something of an outlaw country moment tear, again. I have mentioned on previously occasions when I have discussed county music, or rather more correctly outlaw country music, that I had a very short, but worthwhile period when I was immersed in this genre in the late 1970s. After tiring somewhat of Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings and other more well know country outlaws I gravitated toward the music, eerily beautiful and haunting music, of Townes Van Zandt whose Steve Earle tribute album Townes I have recently reviewed in this space. As I noted there, as well, while this outlaw country thing was short-lived and I scrambled back to my first loves, blues, rock and folk music I always had time to listen to Townes and his funny mix of blues, folk rock, rock folk, and just downright outlaw country.

And that brings us to the album under review, Van Morrison At The Movies , and another “outlaw” country music man, the Belfast cowboy Van Morrison. Wait a minute, Van Morrison? Belfast cowboy? Okay, let me take a few steps back. I first heard Van Morrison in his 1960s rock period when I flipped out over his Into The Mystic on his Moondance album. And when I later saw him doing some blues stuff highlighted by his appearance in Martin Scorsese PBS History of Blues series several years ago I also flipped out, and said yes, brother blues. But somewhere along the way he turned again on us and has “reinvented” himself as the “son”, the legitimate son, of Hank Williams. But Van Morrison is no one-trick pony as his long and hard-bitten career proves.

If you do not believe me then just listen to him ante up on his Gloria (although I admit that I did not know that he wrote that one back in the day), a classic rock bluesy number; the thoughtful Brown-Eyed Girl; the pathos of Days Like This ; the John Lee Hooker song Baby Please Don’t Go; and, something out of time,Into The Mystic. The Belfast cowboy, indeed, although I always thought cowboys wore their emotions down deep, not on their blues high white note sleeves.

Friday, November 16, 2018

In The Light Of Hearing About A Recent Book Expose About Old Hollywood-Karina Longworth’s “Sex, Lies, And Stardom: Exploitation In Howard Hughes’ Hollywood”-Confessions Of A Junkie Film Reviewer


In The Light Of Hearing About A Recent Book Expose About Old Hollywood-Karina Longworth’s “Sex, Lies, And Stardom: Exploitation In Howard Hughes’ Hollywood”-Confessions Of A Junkie Film Reviewer

Link to the Terry Gross NPR Fresh Air interview with author Carina Longworth:

https://www.npr.org/2018/11/13/667391184/sex-lies-and-stardom-exploitation-in-howard-hughes-hollywood

By Sam Lowell

The #MeToo movement has opened many cans of worms although the revelations in the Fresh Air NPR interview by Terry Gross with Carina Longworth about her new book Sex, Lies, And Stardom: Exploitation In Howard Hughes’ Hollywood predate those revelations. Nevertheless, and the author states so herself, without  #MeToo this might just be another interesting book about the mores of Hollywood, old Hollywood her specialty and that would be that. The revelations about Hughes’ sexual appetites were well known to me back in the day, well known back then although I could never get close enough to anybody who had any real details to put those ideas into print.    

Partially in those days when I first worked for American Film Gazette as a stringer and then with my own by-line we did not print anything, or everything, fit to print especially without back-up verification. And it wasn’t solely because I, we would have been sued for some kind of defamation by individual actors or the studios, studio bosses where most of the hush-hush got its start or because we had a super fidelity to the truth and nothing but the truth. Far from it. I was more worried in those pre-historic Neanderthal days about being shut-out of the interviewing process by the studios, not invited to galas and special events where I could mix with people who might become sources and that kind of thing. Not good, not good at all.

Here is where reality hit the road. This sex for career advancement, even to just get in the door as the Hughes case points out was widespread, pervasive, on-going well before the revelations of the past few years. It was the way things operated and young women, and men, remember Hollywood was also a hotbed of closet homosexuality top to bottom, accepted that situation as the overhead cost of getting ahead. I will always remember my first vivid example. I was in the room back in the 1970s when Laura Lane, that gap-tooth beauty, was touting her memoirs and made no bones about the fact that she had slept her way to the top. She became sort of persona non grata after that breath of fresh air because that was breaking the rules. Big time.

To finish up this sordid story of my own conduct I knew plenty, people told me plenty and if I had decided that a good expose would have helped out then that would be what was what. I didn’t, didn’t even come close to thinking about such a thought. Jesus what those poor, benighted young women and men must have had to put up with. #MeToo thanks for the spring cleaning-thanks a lot.             

Of The Caffe Lena And Stuff-Rosalie Sorrels’ My Last Go Round




CD Review

By Zack James

My Last Go Round, Rosalie Sorrels and friends, 2002 

My old high school friend, Seth Garth, who went every step of the way with me back in the 1960s into the Cambridge folk and coffeehouse scene since we lived in next town Arlington reminded me recently that we had spread our folk wings further than Cambridge and its rather boisterous scene. We had taken a few trips down to Mecca, to Greenwich Village in New York City and imbibed the full effect there. But the folk minute while it didn’t survive the British invasion and the rise of “acid” rock to grab young ears also had little outposts in places that one would not assume such music would have much play, at least back then. Seth and I had made a trip to Saratoga in those days to see a cousin of his who was going to Skidmore College. One Saturday night he took us to the Caffe Lena in that town, a small, a very small coffeehouse (still there unlike many other more famous venues which went under when the folk tide ebbed), run by a wild old woman, Lena, who single-handedly ran the place, kept the folk minute alive in that region, kept many a budding folkie from Arlo Guthrie to the McGarrigle Sisters from the wolves and from street corners. It was there that we first saw that night Rosalie Sorrels singing up songs of protest and blues, singing some stuff by a guy named Bruce Phillips, later to be called more famously Utah Phillips.    

All of this a roundabout way of introducing the CD under review, My Last Go Round, a live album of her last public performance along with some of her friends at the Saunders Theater at Harvard in 2002 which Seth and I both attended with our wives who in their own ways had imbibed the folk minute in other locales (Ann Arbor and Berkeley). Rosalie had decided to give up the road, to stick closer to home, so had invited his friends from Caffe Lena and other roads to come and perform. Invited those who were still standing and who could make it. Unfortunately the legendary Dave Van Ronk one of the key figures in the budding folk movement in New York in the late 1950s who was supposed to perform had passed away a few weeks before (to be replaced by the still standing now David Bromberg) which placed a damper on the proceedings.            


It was at this performance that Seth and I (along with the our wives) first took stock than those who stood tall in that 1960s folk minute were starting to pass on and that we had better see performances of whoever was left standing as best we could. We additionally, as we sat in the Café Algiers on Brattle Street after the performance for a late night coffee and pastry (some things never change for that was the bill of fare in the old days when we, low on funds, gravitated to the coffeehouses for cheap dates in high school and college), got into an animated conversation about who did, and who did not, still have “it.” Have a spark of that old time ability to draw a crowd to them. David Bromberg did (and does after a fairly recent performance seen at a Boston venue where he blew the crowd away with his music and a very fine back-up band. And yes, very much yes, Rosalie Sorrels, now sadly passed as well, still had it that night at the Saunders Theater. Listen up.        

A View From The International Left- For a Socialist Federation of the Balkans! Greece: Chauvinist Frenzy over Macedonia

Workers Vanguard No. 1142
19 October 2018
 
For a Socialist Federation of the Balkans!
Greece: Chauvinist Frenzy over Macedonia
Part One
The following is the first part of an article translated from O Bolsevikos (April 2018), newspaper of our comrades of the Trotskyist Group of Greece. Subsequent to the publication of the article, the foreign ministers of Greece and Macedonia signed an agreement in June that Athens would no longer veto Macedonia joining the European Union (EU) and NATO if the country changed its name to the Republic of North Macedonia (Severna Makedonija). It is the imperialists, centrally the U.S., who are driving this deal. As the New York Times (9 October) reports, shortly after the agreement was announced, U.S. officials said that “the State Department, the C.I.A. and the Pentagon’s European Command” were “already on the case” to counter opposition from Russia.
On September 30, a referendum was held in Macedonia that posed the question: “Are you in favor of membership in NATO and the European Union by accepting the deal between the Republic of Macedonia and the Republic of Greece?” As opponents of imperialism and defenders of Macedonian national rights, we revolutionary Marxists would have categorically called for a “No” vote. In fact, the referendum failed because only one-third of the electorate voted, far below the required 50 percent threshold. Those who did turn out voted in favor by a large majority.
The large number of people who stayed away indicates strong popular opposition to changing the name of Macedonia and to the strong-arming of its people by the U.S. and EU imperialists. Nonetheless, Washington made clear that the agreement would be implemented no matter what. Hailing the “yes” vote, the U.S. State Department declared: “The United States strongly supports the Agreement’s full implementation, which will allow Macedonia to take its rightful place in NATO and the EU.” The Macedonian government has dutifully pledged to hold a parliamentary vote to change the country’s name.
*   *   *
On January 21 in Thessaloniki and February 4 in Athens, hundreds of thousands took part in chauvinist demonstrations demanding no use of the term “Macedonia” by the Republic of Macedonia in its name. Participants in those reactionary demonstrations included [bourgeois parties] New Democracy, PASOK, ANEL and hordes of the faithful organized by the [Greek Orthodox] church, as well as retired officers and paramilitary organizations. Spearheading the mob were the fascists of Golden Dawn. In Thessaloniki, the fascists screeched, “The city belongs to the nationalists” before attacking the social center “Sxoleio,” frequented by anarchists, setting fire to the “Libertatia” squat and vandalizing the Holocaust memorial.
Metropolitan [Bishop] Anthimos, speaking inside his church in Thessaloniki, called for support to the demonstrations and intoned: “Wherever Macedonia is, Greece is too and wherever Greece is, Macedonia is too.” This is the same bishop who in 2014 threatened to mobilize youth in Thessaloniki to destroy street signs that commemorate famous Turks in the city. The Orthodox church is a central pillar of the Greek state, a bastion of Greek chauvinism and all-sided reaction. A key demand for the workers movement in Greece is for full separation of church and state.
Greek-chauvinist hysteria over the use of the term “Macedonia” previously erupted after the Republic of Macedonia declared independence in 1991 amid the imperialist-instigated breakup of the deformed workers state in Yugoslavia—a capitalist counterrevolution that was both driven by and gave rise to a nationalist bloodbath. The following year in Greece, enormous demonstrations of up to a million people broke out, with banners declaring: “Macedonia Is Greek.” The Greek ruling class and its Orthodox church insist that the very name Macedonia is exclusively Greek property dating back to antiquity and that “Macedonian” is no more than a “geographical” designation of the citizens in Greece’s northern province of the same name. With Athens intransigent, for almost three decades the Macedonian Republic has been referred to in international bodies as the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM). Greek chauvinists contemptuously refer to the neighboring country only as “Skopje” [its capital].
The installation in May 2017 of a new government in Macedonia, with a coalition led by Zoran Zaev’s Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia replacing the right-wing nationalist Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization-Democratic Party for Macedonian National Unity, has been seized on by the U.S. and European imperialists, and by Syriza, as an opportunity to pressure Macedonia into a compromise over the naming issue. The imperialists, with the support of Syriza, seek to clear a path for the country’s membership in NATO and the EU, which Greece has hitherto vetoed. One of the U.S. imperialists’ chief aims is to undermine Russia’s influence in Macedonia and the rest of the Balkans. As Marxist revolutionaries we oppose on principle both the blood-soaked NATO military alliance and the imperialist EU. NATO out of the Balkans! Close down Souda Base and all the other U.S. bases in Greece! Down with the EU and the euro! Greece out now!
The government of Macedonia has already made concessions by changing the name of its international airport and its main highway to remove references to Alexander the Great. But that is not enough to placate the arrogant Greek chauvinists, who demand that the Republic of Macedonia change its constitution to remove articles that describe the nationality and language of the Slavic population of Macedonia as “Macedonian,” as well as the article that says that “the Republic takes an interest in the situation and the rights of those in neighboring countries who belong to the Macedonian people as well as expatriate Macedonians” (“The Constitution of FYROM Abounds with Irredentist References,” Kathimerini, 24 January).
For Self-Determination of Greece’s Macedonian Minority!
Greek chauvinists insist that any use by the Republic of the term “Macedonia” or references to Macedonians in Greece imply irredentist claims on Greek territory. Macedonia is a tiny country, with a population of only two million, one quarter of whom are ethnic Albanians. But Greece is also a Balkan country, with national questions of its own. The Greek capitalist state is the only one in the Balkans which does not recognize the existence of any national minorities within its borders. Ethnic Macedonians are officially referred to as “Slavophone Greeks” while the Turks of Western Thrace (as well as Pomaks and Roma, who speak other languages) are called “Greek Muslims.” In reality, despite decades of ethnic cleansing and forced Hellenization, a Macedonian population continues to exist concentrated near the border with the Republic of Macedonia.
The Macedonian population has been subjected to systematic discrimination and horrific oppression at the hands of the Greek state. They have been forced to change their names and the names of their villages; their language and culture is prohibited; Macedonian rights activists are persecuted. The hostility of the Greek bourgeoisie toward Macedonians is fueled by the central role that they played in the Communist-led forces during the [1946-49] Civil War. In 1982, the first PASOK government allowed the return from exile of Democratic Army of Greece (DSE) fighters of Greek origin, while Macedonians who fought with the Communists remained stripped of Greek citizenship and continue even today to be denied visas to visit families in Greece. Even to suggest the existence of a Macedonian minority in Greece is enough to unleash a furious chauvinist backlash. Not surprisingly, a climate of fear reigns in the Macedonian areas.
As an integral part of our struggle to forge the nucleus of an internationalist, Leninist workers party in Greece, the Trotskyist Group of Greece (TOE) fights to break the working class from Greek chauvinism in order to fight for proletarian revolution. We fight for the right of the Macedonian minority to self-determination, which means the right of ethnic Macedonians to separate and form their own state or to unite with the existing state of Macedonia. We oppose all discrimination against the various national minorities that live within the borders of Greece—Turks, Arvanites, Vlachs, Pomaks and others—as well as ethnic groups like Roma and fight for their full democratic rights.
In 1992, the chauvinist backlash over Macedonia was whipped up by Greece’s ruling circles against a backdrop of intense working-class struggles against austerity and union-busting. Today also, after a decade of desperate struggles by the working masses against the attacks of the EU and the Greek bourgeoisie—carried out now by the “left” government of the capitalist Syriza party—Greek nationalism is wielded by those hostile to the interests of the working class, to weaken and divide it and to derail its struggles.
Nationalism is poison for the proletariat and directly counterposed to what is so urgently needed today—internationalist solidarity and common class struggle by workers against their bosses throughout the EU. It is not only in poorer countries like Greece and Ireland that workers have suffered from EU austerity. In the most powerful European country, Germany, workers’ living standards have also been ground down to boost the bosses’ profits. It is in the direct interest of Greek workers to oppose the attempts of the capitalists and their hangers-on to whip up chauvinism against their Macedonian, Turkish or German class brothers and sisters.
The working class in Greece will not be able to fight for its own interests and for a victorious proletarian revolution unless it breaks with nationalism—a bourgeois ideology which acts to chain the working people to their exploiters in the so-called “national” interest. Workers have no interests in common with the bosses. It is the task of Leninists to combat Greek chauvinism among the workers and to educate them in the spirit of genuine internationalism, just as our German comrades combat the EU’s crushing of Greek working people at the behest of the German and other imperialist monopolies. A party capable of leading the working class to power at the head of all the oppressed, to expropriate the capitalists and rebuild society in the interests of the working people, must act as “the tribune of the people, who is able to react to every manifestation of tyranny and oppression, no matter where it appears, no matter what stratum or class of the people it affects” (V.I. Lenin, What Is To Be Done?[1902]). In the Balkans, national antagonisms have repeatedly produced rivers of blood but, led by a party modeled on Lenin’s Bolsheviks, the struggle against national oppression can also act as a motor force for proletarian revolution.
It was the chauvinist agitation around Macedonia in 1992—in which Syriza’s predecessors in Synaspismos played a full role—that enabled the fascists of Golden Dawn to emerge from their rat holes. Today, in the absence of a working-class leadership that offers a revolutionary way out of the impasse in the country, the despair engendered by the capitalist economic crisis is providing fertile ground for the fascists to grow. That Golden Dawn was able to march unhindered at the head of more than 100,000 reactionaries in Athens is due to the treachery of the reformist leadership of the working class, especially of the KKE [Communist Party of Greece], which has the numbers and influence in the working class to lead a counteroffensive but instead issues liberal calls to “isolate” the fascists and preaches reliance on the capitalist state. It is urgently necessary to build united-front mobilizations, centered on the social power of the organized working class, to stop Golden Dawn and their ilk before it is too late.
KKE: Once Again in the Service of the Bourgeoisie
The reaction of the Stalinist KKE to the renewed bourgeois campaign over Macedonia has been its customary capitulation to Greek nationalism. In a February 5 statement “regarding the developments with FYROM [!],” the KKE distances itself from the right-wing “Macedonia is Greece” crowd, calling “upon the people to isolate those nationalist, fascist powers that exploit their legitimate concern in order to sow the poison of nationalism and homeland mongering” and claims that in 1992 the party “stood against the dominant nationalist trend that all the other political parties were cultivating” (kke.gr). But this is just window-dressing for the KKE’s own brand of nationalist populism.
In an article in its theoretical journal Kommounistiki Epitheorisi (No. 2, 2018), the KKE tries to outdo even the chauvinism of [Greek prime minister] Tsipras: “A real solution means guarantees of the elimination of irredentism, nationalism, [territorial] claims, ensuring the inviolability of the borders, which means changes now, not in the near future, to the Constitution of the FYROM.” The KKE insists that any name adopted by the Republic “must have a strictly geographical definition.”
In the same article, parroting the worst Greek chauvinists, the KKE declares baldly that: “A historically formed ‘Macedonian’ nation, ‘Macedonian’ ethnicity, ‘Macedonian’ language, which form the basis of irredentism and raise questions of the existence of a minority, claims and defense of its rights etc., do not exist.” The Macedonian people, however, have fought long and hard to exist as a nation with their own language and culture, regardless of the opinions of chauvinist Greek Stalinists. The KKE would never question the pedigree of the Greek nation. One could observe that for centuries under the Byzantines and the Ottomans, Greeks mainly referred to themselves as “Romans” and the development of a national consciousness in Greece, as elsewhere in the Balkans, began only in the late 18th century amid the decay of the Ottoman empire.
The borders of capitalist Greece, which the KKE regards as sacrosanct and inviolable, largely reflect the amount of land that the Greek bourgeoisie was able to grab in the Second Balkan War in 1913 as Greece and Serbia fought Bulgaria to divide up the strategic province of Macedonia. At that time, the peasant population of the territories seized by Greece was mainly Macedonian-speaking, while in Thessaloniki, the largest ethnic group was the Ladino-speaking Jewish population. The founding cadre of what was to become Greek Communism emerged from this rich, cosmopolitan environment.
Today’s KKE upholds imperialist treaties such as that of Bucharest in 1913, which ended the Second Balkan War and put the seal on Greece’s annexations in Epirus and Macedonia (including Thessaloniki). But especially in the Balkans, with its patchwork of nationalities, state boundaries do not at all correspond to the geographical extent of the various nations. The annexations by the bourgeois powers are inevitably followed by mass expulsions (“ethnic cleansing”) and/or forcible assimilation of national minorities. The KKE’s defense of the status quo in the Balkans is a flat denial of the right of self-determination.
Our program on the national question is that of Lenin’s Bolshevik Party. In tsarist Russia—that “prison house of peoples”—the Bolsheviks were champions of the national rights of all the peoples oppressed by the dominant Great Russian chauvinism. Lenin’s party fought for the equality of all nations and for the right of all nations to self-determination, i.e., their right to separate. By demonstrating in practice, not just in words, that they would wage a fight to the death against Great Russian chauvinism, the Bolsheviks were able to mobilize the yearning of the oppressed peoples for national freedom as a mighty force for the October Revolution, winning the proletarian and peasant masses to the fight, alongside their Great Russian class brothers, for the overthrow of all the bourgeois and landlord exploiters.
While the KKE’s groveling to its “own” bourgeoisie is amply demonstrated in its grotesque appeals to 100-year-old imperialist treaties in order to defend the territorial integrity of capitalist Greece, Lenin was quite explicit what the position of genuine communists should be:
“In the internationalist education of the workers of the oppressor countries, emphasis must necessarily be laid on their advocating freedom for the oppressed countries to secede and their fighting for it. Without this there can be no internationalism. It is our right and duty to treat every Social-Democrat [i.e., communist] of an oppressor nation who fails to conduct such propaganda as a scoundrel and an imperialist. This is an absolute demand, even where the chanceof secession being possible and ‘practicable’ before the introduction of socialism is only one in a thousand.
“It is our duty to teach the workers to be ‘indifferent’ to national distinctions [not “discriminations” as the KKE translates it]. There is no doubt about that. But it must not be the indifference of the annexationists. A member of an oppressor nation must be ‘indifferent’ to whether small nations belong to his state or to a neighbouring state or to themselves, according to where their sympathies lie: without such ‘indifference’ he is not a Social-Democrat. To be an internationalist Social-Democrat one must not think only of one’s own nation, but place above it the interests of all nations, their common liberty and equality. Everyone accepts this in ‘theory’ but displays an annexationist indifference in practice. There is the root of the evil.”
— “The Discussion on Self- Determination Summed Up” (July 1916)
[TO BE CONTINUED]

For a Socialist Federation of the Balkans!
Greece: Chauvinist Frenzy over Macedonia
Part Two
The following is the second part of an article translated from O Bolsevikos (April 2018), newspaper of our comrades of the Trotskyist Group of Greece. The introduction to Part One (WV No. 1142, 19 October) addressed the concerted drive by the U.S. and European imperialists to force Macedonia to change its name in order to be considered for membership in the European Union and NATO. On October 19, the Macedonian parliament voted to approve the name change, a first step in the process of renaming the country.
The victory of the workers and peasants in the October Revolution of 1917 inspired the founding, one year later, of the Socialist Workers Party (SEKE)—later to become the Communist Party of Greece (KKE). For most of its history, the KKE has charted a course of opportunist zigzags and open betrayals on the Macedonian national question. While there was from the very beginning a pronounced nationalist bulge among sections of the KKE, nevertheless in its early years the party suffered severe repression at the hands of the Greek bourgeoisie for defending national rights for the Macedonians. In 1924, under pressure from the Comintern, the KKE adopted the call for a united, independent Macedonia and a united, independent Thrace, a position which was to lead to deep divisions within the party and to haunt it thereafter.
Beginning in 1923-24, the Soviet Communist Party and state underwent a qualitative bureaucratic degeneration, a political (but not social) counterrevolution. The victory of a conservative, nationalist bureaucracy, ruling in its own narrow interest as a parasitic excrescence on the workers state, took programmatic shape in December 1924 as Stalin promulgated the absurd idea that the USSR could build socialism on its own, without revolutions in other countries. The Stalinist degeneration was to have a disastrous effect on the young parties of the Communist International, including the KKE. Over the next decade and more, as the Trotskyists fought relentlessly to uphold the banner of Leninist internationalism, the Stalinist bureaucracy zigzagged between outright conciliation of the various imperialist powers and heedless adventurism bound for defeat, transforming the Comintern from a party seeking international workers revolution into one acting as a tool of Kremlin diplomacy.
Today the KKE denies the very existence of a Macedonian nation, language or minority. The KKE’s own past speaks against its present. In 1924, a KKE congress adopted a resolution which said:
“The ruling bourgeoisie, exploiting workers and sucking the blood of the peasants, subordinates whole nations to its exploitation and oppression, while it prattles hypocritically and with ulterior motives about protecting small nations. The ruling capitalists of the dominant nation politically oppress the national minorities and deprive them of any rights (language, school, religion, etc.). It implements the policy of forcible national assimilation in order, in this way, to stifle the resistance of the oppressed nationalities and thereby ensure their unbridled exploitation.
“The Communist Party is the only party which carries out a relentless struggle against the violence, political oppression and economic exploitation of other peoples. Fighting against the bourgeoisie, the KKE supports all genuine revolutionary struggles of these peoples against their national oppression and proclaims the right of self-determination of all nations up to their separation and formation of their own independent state.”
— Official Documents, Vol. 1
But the KKE was soon to abandon any principled position on Macedonian self-determination and to embrace Greek chauvinism. In 1935, at its Sixth Party Congress, the KKE carried out an about-face on the national question, dropping its demand for independence for Macedonia and replacing it with a call only for full equality for the national minorities in Greece. Completely distorting Lenin, in subsequent resolutions, when the KKE spoke of self-determination, it meant that the Macedonian minority had to be incorporated into the Greek state. This turn by the KKE was closely tied to the popular front against fascism, i.e., coalitions of class collaboration with the “anti-fascist” bourgeoisie. With the adoption of the popular-front policy, the Stalinized Communist parties, including the KKE, went over decisively to the defense of the bourgeois order just as the Social Democracy had done over WWI, pledging to defend every inch of national soil.
During the [1946-49] Civil War, Macedonians constituted at least 25 percent of the Democratic Army of Greece (DSE) but the KKE, in the name of “national unity,” had buried any call for self-determination. A major factor in winning Macedonian support for the DSE’s struggle was the social revolution that had taken place in Yugoslavia. There the Macedonian fighters had formed their own headquarters, which was staffed by Macedonian officers and which used the Macedonian language and flag. The creation of an autonomous Macedonian Republic inside the Yugoslav federation exercised a strong attraction on the Slavs in Greece. The Yugoslavs’ campaign for a united Macedonia was met with hostility from the KKE.
At the time of [Yugoslav Communist Party leader] Tito’s split with Stalin, the KKE made an effort at reconciliation with the Macedonians in order to undermine their support for Tito. In January 1949, the KKE pledged that with “the victory of the DSE and of the people’s revolution, the Macedonian people will find their full national restoration as they themselves wish” (Resolution of the Fifth Plenum of the CC of the KKE, 30-31 January 1949, rizospastis.gr). However, following defeat in the Civil War, the KKE again repudiated the right of national self-determination. Party spokesman Vasilis Bartziotas announced in October 1949: “Today the situation has changed.... We have to return to the slogan for national equality which was put forth by the [1935] Sixth Congress of the KKE.” (See “Greece 1940s: A Revolution Betrayed,” Spartacist [English-language edition] No. 64, Summer 2014.)
Many of the reformist groups in and around the coalition Antarsya claim to oppose Greek chauvinism and to uphold the rights of the Macedonian minority in Greece. However, they balk at the right of self-determination. In a common statement titled “The Enemy Is Not the Neighboring People but ‘Our Own’ Bourgeoisie,” OKDE-Spartakos, EEK, OEN and ORMA write: “Political organizations blocked the Nazis’ path and made propaganda against the nationalist demonstrations, advancing the right of self-determination of the Republic of Macedonia,” by which they mean the right of the Republic to choose its own name. This declaration makes a mockery of the right of self-determination, i.e., the right to independent statehood. The Republic of Macedonia was autonomous within the Yugoslav deformed workers state and had been formally independent since the capitalist counterrevolution in 1991. The Slavic population there does not need more “self-determination” (it’s a different matter for the Albanians). The real issue, which the opportunists of OKDE-Spartakos, EEK et al. refuse to countenance, is the right of the Macedonians in Greece to freely choose their own destiny.
The first Greek supporters of Leon Trotsky’s Left Opposition—the Archeiomarxists—were opposed to independence for the Macedonian minority. In discussions with the Archeiomarxists in 1932, Trotsky castigated his supporters for this chauvinist line. Responding to their argument that Aegean Macedonia was “90 percent Greeks,” Trotsky replied: “Our first task is to take an attitude of total skepticism toward these [government] figures.” On the question of independence, Trotsky said:
“I’m not certain whether it is correct to reject this slogan. We cannot say we are opposed to it because the population will be against it. The population must be asked for its opinion on this. The ‘Bulgarians’ represent an oppressed layer....
“It’s not our task to organize nationalist uprisings. We merely say that if the Macedonians want it, we will then side with them, that they should be allowed to decide, and we will also support their decision.”
— “A Discussion on Greece” (Spring 1932)
He went on to point to the crux of the matter for Marxists in Greece:
“What disturbs me is not so much the question of the Macedonian peasants, but rather whether there isn’t a touch of chauvinist poison in Greek workers. That is very dangerous. For us, who are for a Balkan federation of soviet states, it is all the same if Macedonia belongs to this federation as an autonomous whole or part of another state.”
For a Socialist Federation of the Balkans
For more than a century, Macedonia has been the “apple of discord” of the Balkans, a strategic region hotly contested since the collapse of the Ottoman empire by Greece, Bulgaria and Serbia, who partitioned this multiethnic province among themselves before WWI. An equitable resolution of the Macedonian national question is closely bound up with the struggle for a socialist federation of the Balkans.
In the 1870s, Serbian socialists first put forward a proposal for a Balkan federation, a proposal that was adopted by the Second International as the only means for defusing national tensions in the peninsula that were being continually stirred by the Great Powers in their own interests. Following the slaughter of WWI that was sparked by Balkan tensions, the Communist International insisted that the local bourgeoisies were incapable of transcending national antagonisms and that a Balkan federation would only come about as a result of proletarian revolution.
The victory of Tito’s partisan army in WWII over the Axis forces, the Serbian monarchist Chetniks and the Croatian fascist Ustasha led to the smashing of the capitalist state in Yugoslavia and the creation of a workers state. On the basis of workers power, decades of bloody national conflict among the South Slavs and others were brought to an end. This was a remarkable achievement which pointed to the possibilities inherent in proletarian power for resolving the national questions. However, Yugoslavia was deformed from the outset by the Stalinist bureaucracy of Tito, which did not fight for the international extension of the revolution but rather ruled on the basis of the utterly false Stalinist perspective of “socialism in one country.”
The Yugoslav version of that anti-Marxist dogma was “market socialism,” a series of reforms that allowed competition between enterprises and pitted the more developed regions of Yugoslavia, such as Slovenia, against less developed areas such as Kosovo and Macedonia, setting nationality against nationality and unleashing the centrifugal forces that would eventually devour the deformed workers state in an orgy of nationalist bloodletting.
With the postwar creation of deformed workers states in Yugoslavia, Bulgaria and Romania, the call for a Balkan socialist federation acquired renewed currency. Within the framework of a peninsular federation, the thorny Macedonian question could have been easily resolved. But Tito’s Yugoslavia, Dimitrov’s Bulgaria and the KKE in Greece (not to mention Stalin in the Kremlin) each pursued their own version of “socialism in one country” in which calls for a socialist federation of the Balkans were raised and dropped according to the opportunist appetites of the Stalinists, each exploiting the Macedonian question for their own interests.
As genuine Marxists, we recognize that the conflicting national claims of the various Balkan peoples can only be equitably resolved through the proletarian overthrow of all the capitalist regimes of the region and the forging of a socialist federation of the Balkans, including Greece, as part of a Socialist United States of Europe. The Trotskyist Group of Greece, as the Greek section of the International Communist League (Fourth Internationalist), is fighting to build a revolutionary workers party, modeled on the Bolsheviks of Lenin and Trotsky, to finally achieve that aim.

U.S. Imperialist Mass Murder in Korea The 1948 Jeju Massacre

Workers Vanguard No. 1143
2 November 2018
 
U.S. Imperialist Mass Murder in Korea
The 1948 Jeju Massacre
“All exits to the sea, all roads, and all exits from villages were blocked. Under the command of Colonel John Mansfield, the Fifth Korean Constabulary Regiment and the National Police swept across villages searching for weapons and ‘any suspicious characters, organizers, and Communists.’… All civilians were stopped on the road or in villages and herded together…. Between April 27 and May 6, the island of Cheju was sealed off from the outside world and suffered an ‘orgy of slaughter’.”
— Su-kyoung Hwang, Korea’s Grievous War (2016)
Seventy years ago, in April 1948, South Korean forces under the control of the U.S. Army launched an anti-Communist massacre on Jeju (Cheju) Island off the south coast of the Korean peninsula. Their aim was to eradicate all opposition to the brutal military dictatorship installed by U.S. occupation forces after Japan’s defeat in the Second World War. The bloodbath continued for more than a year; by the end, as many as 80,000 people had been slaughtered, more than 20 percent of the island’s population. Women were systematically raped. Seventy percent of all homes were destroyed.
The truth about the Jeju butchery was systematically suppressed for decades: even the mass graves were kept hidden. To this day, the events are little known outside the peninsula. Yet the massacre was but one of many inflicted upon Korea’s workers and peasants by the U.S. and its allies in their crusade to “roll back Communism” in Asia. This is the true face of imperialism, exposing as a cynical lie the “democratic” pretensions used by the U.S. rulers to disguise their barbarism.
Su-kyoung Hwang’s book, which is based in part on interviews with survivors of the Jeju horrors, is a valuable contribution to uncovering this history. Hwang cites the account of a woman named Kim Ok-nyo: “I was stripped naked in the police yard and beaten senseless with a log, everywhere and even here. My hands were tied with cables, and before they switched on the electricity, they would run the water and fill the tank up.... When it seemed like they were going to kill me, I pleaded, ‘Just kill me, please kill me’.” Another elderly survivor, Kim Tae-jin, described how islanders were herded to the shoreline as police burned down their villages, homes and schools, then lined up for execution as suspected communists. “The police remained free of any culpability,” he said. “So they could kill anyone, countless innocent lives.”
The Jeju bloodbath was a direct precursor to the 1950-53 Korean War. In that war, U.S.-led forces under the auspices of the United Nations slaughtered three million people as the imperialists sought to crush a social revolution on the Korean peninsula and destroy the deformed workers state that had been created in North Korea under the protection of Soviet troops. U.S. warplanes attacked Korea with napalm and destroyed cities, factories and dams. Civilians were massacred by the tens of thousands, as in the South Korean village of No Gun Ri, where some 400 peasants including women and children were machine-gunned to death by the U.S. First Cavalry Division. In the words of Air Force general Curtis LeMay, who organized the firebombing of Tokyo in WWII: “We burned down every town in North Korea and in South Korea too.” Washington repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons as well, but was hindered by Moscow’s development of its own nuclear arsenal.
The U.S. rulers sought to use the Korean War as a staging post to the overthrow of the 1949 Chinese Revolution, which had smashed capitalist class rule in the world’s most populous country, but were blocked by the intervention of some three million heroic Chinese People’s Liberation Army troops. The war was fought to a stalemate, after which Washington for decades propped up a series of brutal police-state regimes in South Korea. Nearly 30,000 U.S. troops remain there to this day, an ever-present threat to China as well as North Korea and to the combative South Korean working class.
We demand the withdrawal of all U.S. forces from South Korea and an end to imperialist sanctions against North Korea. As Trotskyists, we stand for the unconditional military defense of North Korea, China and the other deformed workers states against imperialism and counterrevolution, including their development of nuclear weapons as a deterrent against imperialist attack. On this basis, we call for the revolutionary reunification of Korea through socialist revolution in the South and workers political revolution to oust the parasitic Stalinist bureaucracy in the North, establishing a government based on workers democracy and revolutionary internationalism.
A Mass Upsurge of Workers and Peasants
The Jeju events grew out of an upsurge by Korea’s workers and peasants that began in 1945. With the collapse of Tokyo’s brutal, decades-long colonial rule, the masses rose up, engaging in protests, strikes and land and factory seizures. The small Korean capitalist class had been wholly dependent on their Japanese overlords and was hostile to the fight for national emancipation.
In the wake of Japan’s defeat, the Soviet Red Army moved into the peninsula from the north. The U.S. hastily proposed, and Stalin criminally accepted, the division of Korea at the 38th parallel. A regime led by Kim Il Sung, a former Stalinist guerrilla fighter in Japanese-controlled Manchuria, was installed in the North under Soviet army protection and soon moved to expropriate the landlords and capitalists. This was a social revolution that established the economic foundations of workers rule, though one deformed from birth by the existence of a bureaucratic caste that monopolized political power and deprived Korean workers of control over their own state. In the South, in stark contrast, the U.S. occupying forces allied with those who had collaborated with the Japanese, to crush the workers and peasants insurgency that was spreading throughout the country. Police, judges and prison guards who had served the colonial regime simply went from Japanese to U.S. pay.
Organizations known as people’s committees had emerged after the Japanese defeat across most of the country. Their character varied from area to area: some were led by “patriotic” bourgeois and religious forces, while others were dominated by left-wing peasant-based nationalists or forces based on the working class. The latter prominently included the Communist Party (CP), whose members had previously been in exile or underground, as well as workers who were among the millions who returned home after being forced to toil in Japanese factories and mines during the war. In the North, the most industrialized part of Korea, the Soviet-backed regime encouraged land and factory takeovers by the people’s committees, then moved to co-opt them as it consolidated its bureaucratic rule.
In June 1946, half a million protesters marched in Seoul against the U.S. military regime. In September, tens of thousands of rail workers went on strike, demanding the nationalization of industry and dismissal of all police and government officials who had collaborated with the Japanese. This sparked a general strike that was backed by peasants and students. The U.S. ruthlessly suppressed the uprising, killing hundreds and arresting tens of thousands. “We set up concentration camps outside town and held strikers there when the jails got too full,” wrote one American official. “It was war. We recognized it as war. And that is the way we fought it” (cited in George Katsiaficas, Asia’s Unknown Uprisings, Volume 1 [2012]).
The turmoil soon spread to Jeju, a strategically located island that U.S. Army reports described as a “hotbed of Communism” and a “cancer of the troubles in South Korea.” After the Japanese surrender, workers had seized all 72 of the chemical and manufacturing enterprises on the island. By late 1946, the new Workers Party of South Korea (WPSK)—a fusion of the South Korean wing of the CP and two other organizations—had won control of the local people’s committee, which largely consisted of farmers and fishermen.
The WPSK and its CP predecessor were far from being authentic revolutionary parties; rather, they upheld the disastrous Stalinist strategy of seeking allies among “progressive” bourgeois forces. The CP had sought an alliance with the U.S. occupiers as potential liberators from the Japanese. And now the WPSK was ready to link up with any force, including elements of the national bourgeoisie, that opposed those in the ruling class and military who had collaborated with the Japanese and were now serving as U.S. tools.
Cold War and Counterrevolutionary Terror
When tens of thousands rallied in Jeju City on March 1, 1947 to mark the anniversary of a 1919 revolt against Japanese rule, U.S. forces ordered South Korean police to open fire, killing six people. An island-wide general strike broke out against the killings. The U.S. brought in hundreds of additional police and a squad of nearly 1,000 fanatically right-wing youth who had been displaced from North Korea. Fascist bands organized by these thugs engaged in an orgy of terror, raping and murdering their way from village to village on the island.
That same month, as part of the Cold War against the Soviet Union, Democratic Party president Harry Truman announced a global policy of American military, political and economic intervention to stop the spread of Communism. At the time, Korea was the main front of the anti-Soviet drive in Asia. Having already blocked all transit across the North-South border, the U.S. banned radio contact with the North. The WPSK was declared illegal and repression increased sharply throughout the U.S.-occupied zone.
Washington turned to Syngman Rhee, a rabid anti-Communist who had lived in the U.S. for decades, as its hand-picked puppet to become president of the South in an “election” boycotted by all other parties. Rhee was literally the only prominent Korean politician the U.S. could find who was not tainted by support to the Japanese occupation. He had already promised his paymasters that Jeju Island would be made available for a huge U.S. military base.
The killings, repression and torture on the island, combined with opposition to the fraudulent U.S.-run election, led the WPSK to launch an armed uprising on Jeju on 3 April 1948. Simultaneous attacks were launched against the fascist youth gangs and police stations across the island. These won broad support; even the provincial governor went over to the side of the insurgents. A truce was negotiated later that month, but the U.S. vetoed it and ordered the Korean Constabulary to conduct a “scorched earth” policy. Eighteen U.S. warships blockaded Jeju to prevent infiltration from the mainland and bombarded defenseless villagers. American military “advisers” provided South Korean forces and their fascist auxiliaries with advanced weaponry. In contrast, most rebels had only handmade spears, swords or farm implements.
As carnage swept through the island, revulsion at the mass murder led to revolts in the South Korean army. When the Korean Constabulary’s Fourteenth Regiment was ordered to Jeju to help suppress the uprising in October 1948, thousands of soldiers mutinied, killing their officers and former Japanese collaborators. The soldiers seized control of the area around Yeosu and nearby Suncheon on the mainland in what became known as the Yeosun Uprising. Mass celebrations broke out as they hoisted the flag of the newly declared People’s Republic in the North.
The U.S. dispatched troops in a bloody counteroffensive that retook Suncheon and Yeosu. Thousands were executed, the army was purged of leftist elements, and a law was passed making collaboration with North Korea a capital offense. But mutinies continued over the following year. In May 1949, two battalions of the Eighth Regiment walked across the 38th parallel and joined the North Korean armed forces. A CIA assessment later that year reported that South Korea was “wholly dependent on U.S. economic and military aid for its survival.”
When the North Korean army moved south the following year, they were greeted as liberators by the workers and peasants. If not for massive U.S. air power launched from Japan, followed by the full-scale military invasion under the UN fig leaf, the North Korean forces would likely have taken all of Korea with little resistance. The price of U.S. imperialism’s intervention to shore up capitalist rule in South Korea is staggering: more than 100,000 killed from 1946 to 1950, followed by the extermination of millions in the war itself.
For Workers Revolution in the Bastion of World Imperialism!
The Jeju massacre was an unspeakable crime of U.S. imperialism that should be seared into the consciousness of workers worldwide. Today, Jeju is marketed as a tourist paradise, the “Hawaii of South Korea.” But a decade ago, excavations at the island’s international airport unearthed the remains of hundreds of victims of the 1948-49 anti-Communist slaughter. Some 700 people had been summarily executed there, their bodies thrown into pits.
South Korea recently opened a massive naval base on Jeju’s south coast facing the East China Sea. U.S. nuclear submarines and other naval vessels began arriving last year, part of Washington’s military “pivot to Asia” directed centrally against China and initiated under the Obama presidency. Construction of the base was met by years of angry protests on the island.
It was the Democratic Party administration of Truman that oversaw the mass killings in Jeju and elsewhere in South Korea and began the Korean War. After Donald Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un earlier this year, Democratic leaders denounced his supposed “concessions” and called North Korea a “threat to the security of the United States, our allies and the world.” The real threat to the world is U.S. imperialism, armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons and with some 200,000 military personnel deployed in at least 170 countries. The Trump administration and the Democrats both seek to force North Korea to surrender its nuclear deterrent, which would render it defenseless in the face of U.S. aggression.
The carnage on Jeju Island seven decades ago is but one example of the horrors perpetrated by U.S. imperialism against working people and oppressed nations around the world. Our aim is the defeat of U.S. imperialism through workers revolution by the multiracial proletariat. The Spartacist League is dedicated to building a revolutionary workers party that is the U.S. section of a reforged Fourth International, the necessary leadership for the workers to put an end to capitalist rule and mass murder once and for all.