Markin comment:
NOT ONE PENNY, NOT
ONE SOLDIER FOR THESE WARS!
OUT NOW! GET THE TROOP TRANSPORTS READY, WARM UP THE
PLANE ENGINES!
The Congress of late has been acting fast and
furiously on their conception of a satisfactory withdrawal policy from Iraq. As
of March 31, 2007, however, the action has been all show and no substance as
President Bush has vowed to veto any war budget that ‘curtails’ his ability to
keep the war going until the end of his presidency (and beyond). Thus, we are
in a waiting period until the various parliamentary maneuvers are played out.
In any case none of this maneuvering means a withdrawal any time soon. And, to
boot, the war WILL be funded through next year one way or another. Franz Kafka
would have had a field day writing one of his truculent novels on this mess.
For now, here are some thoughts on the latest developments. The first note was
originally written just after the House voted on the war budget on March 23,
2007.
ON THE HOUSE WAR BUDGET
VOTE-THE DEMOCRATS OFFICIALLY OWN THE IRAQ WAR
NOT
ONE PENNY, NOT ONE SOLDIER FOR THESE WARS!
On Friday March 23, 2007 the United States House of Representatives by a
narrow vote
of 218 to 212 voted FOR a 124 billion dollar war budget for funding the Iraq
and Afghanistan wars, among other things. That is more than the Bush
Administration requested. However, attached to this budget was a binding
(finally, something other than smoke and mirrors)resolution for withdrawal of
troops from Iraq no later than August 31, 2008, President Bush in response stated
unequivocally that he would veto this budget due to the withdrawal resolution and
the fact the war budget was more than he wanted, Who would have thought?
Militants call for a straight no vote to any capitalist war budget. That
is a given. However, some comment is required here. Clearly a war budget that was
patched together with little goodies for its members by the Democratic House
leadership in order to get a majority vote is not supportable. Nor is a budget
that is passed on the basis that the President is going to veto it anyway, but
everyone gets to look good for the folks back home. That is cynical but hardly unusual
in bourgeois politics. What I find important
-out of this jumble- is the amount of pressure that the House leadership felt
was on it to carry out its mandate from the mid-term elections about doing
something to get the hell out of Iraq, Unfortunately this is not the road out
of Iraq, Increasing
the war budget and then leaving it up to President Bush to veto the damn thing
smacks of parliamentary cretinism. Forget the Democrats (on this one the
Republicans are not even on the radar),
A semi-kudo to Democratic presidential
candidate Ohio Congressman Dennis
Kucinich
for voting against this charade. At least he had the forthrightness to state
that if you wanted to end the war now you needed to vote against the measure.
That he
is a voice in the wilderness and is in the wrong party is a fact of life. That his candidacy is thus not politically supportable by militants does not negate the fact that he is right on this on ,
is a voice in the wilderness and is in the wrong party is a fact of life. That his candidacy is thus not politically supportable by militants does not negate the fact that he is right on this on ,
NOT ONE PENNY, NOT ONE SOLDIER FOR THE WAR!
UNITED STATES OUT OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN! BUILD A WORKERS PARTY THAT FIGHTS FOR SOCIALISM!
UNITED STATES OUT OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN! BUILD A WORKERS PARTY THAT FIGHTS FOR SOCIALISM!
AND NOW FOR THE SENATE-THE DEMOCRATS REALLY OWN THIS WAR
On March 27, 2007 the United States Senate by a margin of 50-48 voted
FOR its own version of the war budget only this time adding a non-binding
resolution to withdraw troops by March 31, 2008. Apparently not be outdone in
parliamentary cretinism by the House this ‘non-binding’ resolution has so many
contingent exceptions that, given the political and military realities in Iraq,
the exceptions in this case really will swallow up the rule. Now the ‘battle’
between the House and Senate versions and the upcoming fight between the
legislative and executive branches will begin in earnest. However, as stated
above in discussing the House vote the cold, hard reality on the ground is that
this war continues, despite all reason, through 2008 at the least. Nice work,
guys and gals. More on this latter. For now, however, one comment will suffice
about the Senate vote-where were all those ‘hard-line’ anti-war Senators like
the Honorable Barack Obama on this vote. Apparently Senator John Forbes Kerry
is not the only ‘flip-flop’ artist in
the Democratic ranks. As least Congressman Kucinich got it right on this one.
Already this 2008 election cycle is looking very, very dreary.
A RAY OF HOPE?
The real news this week was in Washington but not on the Hill. It seems
that the Building and Construction Trades Union had its annual convention in
D.C. this year. Naturally, in the never-ending presidential political cycle all
the bourgeois politicians, particularly Democratic presidential contenders, showed
up looking for support and or money, or both. The upshot of all this is that
this war is so unpopular down at the base of society that even fringe candidate
Ohio Congressman Kucinich got a rousing cheer when he called for immediate
withdrawal. The only ‘loser’ was the hapless Republican House minority leader
who was booed roundly for even pretending to defend the Bush Administration
policy on Iraq.
For those who may not know this union represents members whose sons and
daughters and other relatives are the rank and file soldiers and sailors who
are fighting this war. These unionists are the people who a few years ago were
falling all over themselves to slap those yellow SUPPORT THE TROOPS stickers on
their SUV’s and pickup trucks. And for
those who forgot, or are too young to remember, an earlier generation of
these unionists (in some cases, their fathers) were the die-hard ‘hard hats’
who supported Richard Nixon’s Vietnam
War policy long after it was fashionable to do so. The point for militants today
is to take this hatred of the war at the base and do something about it. As I
have repeatedly mentioned, get those anti-war soldier and sailor solidarity
committees going. You want a place to start-talk to those building trades unionists. Believe me you will get a hearing when you
talk about revving up the troop transports and warming up the planes to get the
hell out of Iraq now. Enough said.
No comments:
Post a Comment