Those Who Fought For Our Communist Future Are Kindred Spirits-James P. Cannon
http://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/
http://www.marxists.org/archive/cannon/works/
From The Pen Of Josh Breslin
Back in the early 1970s after they had
worked out between themselves the rudiment of what had gone wrong with the May
Day 1971 actions in Washington, D.C. Sam Eaton and Ralph Morris began some
serious study of leftist literature from an earlier time, from back earlier in
the century. Those May Day anti-Vietnam War actions, ill-conceived as they in
the end turned out to be, centered on the proposition that if the American
government would not close down the damn blood-sucking war then they, those
thousands that participated in the actions, would close down the government.
All Sam, Ralph and those thousands of others got for their efforts was a
round-up into the bastinado. Sam had been picked off in the round-up on
Pennsylvania Avenue as his group (his “affinity group” for the action) had been
on their way to “capture” the White House. Ralph and his affinity group of
ex-veterans and their supporters were rounded-up on Massachusetts Avenues
heading toward the Pentagon (they had no plans to capture that five-sided
building, at least they were unlike Sam’s group not that naïve, just surround
it like had occurred in an anti-war action in 1967 which has been detailed in
Norman Mailer’s prize-winning book Armies
Of The Night). For a time RFK (Robert F. Kennedy) Stadium, the home of the
Washington Redskins football team) had been the main holding area for those
arrested and detained. The irony of being held in a stadium named after the
martyred late President’s younger brother and lightening rod for almost all anti-war
and “newer world” political dissent before he was assassinated in the bloody summer
of 1968 and in a place where football, a sport associated in many radical minds
with all that was wrong with the American system was lost on Sam and Ralph at
the time and it was only later, many decades later, as they were sitting in a
bar in Boston across from the JFK Federal Building on one of their periodic
reunions when Ralph was in town that Sam had picked up that connection.
Sam, from Carver in Massachusetts, who
had been a late convert to the anti-war movement in 1969 after his closest high
school friend, Jeff Mullin, had been blown away in some jungle town in the
Central Highlands was like many late converts to a cause a “true believer,” had
taken part in many acts of civil disobedience at draft boards, including the
one in hometown Carver, federal buildings and military bases. From an
indifference, no that’s not right, from a mildly patriotic average young
American citizen that you could find by the score hanging around Mom and Pop
variety stores, pizza parlors, diners, and bowling alleys in the early 1960s,
he had become a long-haired bearded “hippie anti-warrior.” Not too long though
by the standards of “youth nation” of the day since he was running a small
print shop in Carver in order to support his mother and four younger sisters
after his father had passed away suddenly of a massive heart attack in 1965
which exempted him from military service. Not too short either since those
“squares” were either poor bastards who got tagged by the military and had to
wear their hair short an appearance which stuck out in towns like Cambridge, Ann
Arbor, Berkeley and L.A. when the anti-war movement started embracing the increasingly
frustrated and anti-war soldiers that they were beginning to run across or, worse,
cops before they got “hip” to the idea that guys wearing short hair, no beard,
looked like they had just taken a bath, and wore plaid short-sleeved shirts and
chinos might as well have a bulls-eye target on their backs surveilling the
counter-cultural crowd.
Ralph, from Troy, New York, had been
working in his father’s electrical shop which had major orders from General
Electric the big employer in the area when he got his draft notice and had
decided to enlist in order to avoid being an 11B, an infantryman, a grunt,
“cannon fodder,” although he would not have known to call it that at the time,
that would come later. He had expected to go into something which he knew
something about in the electrical field at least that is what the recruiting
sergeant in Albany had “promised” him. But in the year 1967 (and 1968 too since
he had extended his tour six months to get out of the service a little early)
what the military needed in Vietnam whatever else they might have needed was
“cannon fodder,” guys to go out into the bushes and kill commies. Simple as
that. And that was what Ralph Morris, a mildly patriotic average young American
citizen, no that is not right, a very patriotic average young American citizen that
you could also find by the score hanging around Mom and Pop variety stores,
pizza parlors, diners, and bowling alleys in the early 1960s, did. But see he
got “religion” up there in Pleiku, up there in the bush and so when he had been
discharged from the Army in late 1969 he was in a rage against the machine.
Sure he had gone back to the grind of his father’s electrical shop but he was
out of place just then, out of sorts, needed to find an outlet for his anger at
what he had done, what had happened to buddies very close to him, what buddies
had done, and how the military had made them animals, nothing less. (Ralph
after his father retired would take over the electric shop business on his own
in 1991 and would thereafter give it to his son to take over after he retired
in 2011.)
One day he had gone to Albany on a job
for his father and while on State Street he had seen a group of guys in
mismatched military garb marching in the streets without talking, silent which
was amazing in itself from what he had previously seen of such marches and just
carrying a big sign-Vietnam Veterans Against The War (VVAW) and nobody stopped
them, no cops, nobody, nobody yelled “commie” either or a lot of other macho
stuff that he and his hang out guys used to do in Troy when some peaceniks held
peace vigils in the square. The civilian on-lookers held their tongues that day
although Ralph knew that the whole area still retained a lot of residual
pro-war feeling just because America was fighting somewhere for something. He
parked his father’s truck and walked over to the march just to watch at first. Some
guy in a tattered Marine mismatched uniform wearing Chuck Taylor sneakers in
the march called out to the crowd for anybody who had served in Vietnam, served
in the military to join them shouting out their military affiliation as they
did so. Ralph almost automatically blurred out-“First Air Cav” and walked right
into the street. There were other First Air Cav guys there that day so he was
among kindred. So yeah, Ralph did a lot of actions with VVAW and with
“civilian” collectives who were planning more dramatic actions. Ralph always
would say later that if it hadn’t been for getting “religion” on the war issue
and doing all those political actions then he would have gone crazy, would have
wound up like a lot of guys he would see later at the VA, see out in the
cardboard box for a home streets, and would not until this day have supported
in any way he could, although lately not physically since his knee replacement,
those who had the audacity to march for the “good old cause.”
That is the back story of a
relationship has lasted until this day, an unlikely relationship in normal
times and places but in that cauldron of the early 1970s when the young, even
the not so very young, were trying to make heads or tails out of what was
happening in a world they did not crate, and were not asked about there were
plenty of such stories, although most did not outlast that search for the newer
world when the high tide of the 1960s ebbed in the mid-1970s. Ralph had noticed
while milling around the football field waiting for something to happen,
waiting to be released, Sam had a VVAW button on his shirt and since he did not
recognize Sam from any previous VVAW action had asked if he was a member of the
organization and where. Sam told him the story of his friend Jeff Mullin and of
his change of heart about the war, and about doing something about ending the
damn thing. That got them talking, talking well into the first night of their
captivity when they found they had many things in common coming from deeply
entrenched working-class cultures. (You already know about Troy. Carver is
something like the cranberry bog capital of the world even today although the
large producers dominate the market unlike when Sam was a kid and the small
Finnish growers dominated the market and town life. The town moreover has
turned into something of a bedroom community for the high-tech industry that
dots U.S. 495.) After a couple of days in the bastinado Sam and Ralph hunger,
thirsty, needing a shower after suffering through the Washington humidity heard
that people were finding ways of getting out to the streets through some side
exits. They decided to surreptiously attempt an “escape” which proved
successful and they immediately headed through a bunch of letter, number and
state streets on the Washington city grid toward Connecticut Avenue heading
toward Silver Springs trying to hitchhike out of the city. A couple of days
later having obtained a ride through from Trenton, New Jersey to Providence,
Rhode Island they headed to Sam’s mother’s place in Carver. Ralph stayed there
a few days before heading back home to Troy. They had agreed that they would
keep in contact and try to figure out what the hell went wrong in Washington
that week. After making some connections through some radicals he knew in
Cambridge to live in a commune Sam asked Ralph to come stay with him for the
summer and try to figure out that gnarly problem. Ralph did, although his
father was furious since he needed his help on a big GE contract for the
Defense Department but Ralph was having none of that.
So in the summer of 1971 Sam and Ralph
began to read that old time literature, although Ralph admitted he was not much
of a reader and some of the stuff was way over his head, Sam’s too. Mostly they
read socialist and communist literature, a little of the old IWW (Wobblie)
stuff since they both were enthrall to the exploits of the likes of Big Bill
Haywood out West which seemed to dominate the politics of that earlier time.
They had even for a time joined a loose study group sponsored by one of the
myriad “red collectives” that had sprung up like weeds in the Cambridge area.
Both thought it ironic at the time, and others who were questioning the
direction the “movement” was heading in stated the same thing when they were in
the study groups, that before that time in the heyday of their anti-war
activity everybody dismissed the old white guys (a term not in common use then
like now) like Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, and their progeny as irrelevant. Now
everybody was glued to the books.
It was from that time that Sam and
Ralph got a better appreciation of a lot of the events, places, and
personalities from the old time radicals. Events like the start of May Day in
1886 as an international working class holiday which they had been clueless
about despite the May Day actions, the
Russian Revolutions, the Paris Commune, the Chinese Revolutions, August 1914 as
a watershed against war, the Communist International, those aforementioned radicals
Marx, Lenin, Trostky, adding in Mao, Che, Fidel, Ho whose names were on
everybody’s tongue (and on posters in every bedroom) even if the reason for
that was not known. Most surprising of all were the American radicals like
Haywood, Browder, Cannon, Foster, and others who nobody then, or almost nobody
cared to know about at all.
As they learned more information about
past American movements Sam, the more interested writer of such pieces began to
write appreciation of past events, places and personalities. His first effort
was to write something about the commemoration of the 3 Ls (Lenin, Luxemburg,
and Liebknecht) started by the Communist International back in the 1920s in
January 1972, the first two names that he knew from a history class in junior
college and the third not at all. Here is what he had to say then which he recently
freshly updated. Sam told Ralph after he had read and asked if he was still a “true
believer” said a lot of piece he would still stand by today:
“Every January, as readers of this piece
are now, hopefully, familiar with the international communist movement honors
the 3 Ls-Lenin, Luxemburg and Liebknecht, fallen leaders of the early 20th
century communist movement who died in this month (and whose untimely deaths
left a huge, irreplaceable gap in the international leadership of that time).
January is thus a time for us to reflect on the roots of our movement and those
who brought us along this far. In order to give a fuller measure of honor to
our fallen forbears this January, and in future Januarys, this space will honor
others who have contributed in some way to the struggle for our communist
future. [Sam did so for a few years but as the times changed, he expanded his printing
business and started a family he gave that up.] That future classless society,
however, will be the true memorial to their sacrifices. This year we pay
special honor to American Communist Party and American Trotskyist leader James
P. Cannon.
Note on inclusion: this year’s honorees
do not exhaust the list of every possible communist worthy of the name. Nor, in
fact, is the list limited to Bolshevik-style communists. There will be names
included from other traditions (like anarchism, social democracy, the Diggers, Levelers,
Jacobins, etc.) whose efforts contributed to the international struggle. Also this
year’s efforts are no more than an introduction to these heroes of the class
struggle. Future years will see more detailed information on each entry,
particularly about many of the lesser known figures. Better yet, the reader can
pick up the ball and run with it if he or she has more knowledge about the particular
exploits of some communist militant, or to include a missing one.
**********
BOOK REVIEW
SPEECHES FOR SOCIALISM- JAMES P. CANNON, PATHFINDER PRESS, NEW YORK, 1971
If you are interested in the history of the American Left or are a militant trying to understand some of the past lessons of our history concerning the socialist response to various social and labor questions this book is for you. This book is part of a continuing series of the writings of James P. Cannon that was published by the organization he founded, the Socialist Workers Party. [Cannon died in 1974.]
SPEECHES FOR SOCIALISM- JAMES P. CANNON, PATHFINDER PRESS, NEW YORK, 1971
If you are interested in the history of the American Left or are a militant trying to understand some of the past lessons of our history concerning the socialist response to various social and labor questions this book is for you. This book is part of a continuing series of the writings of James P. Cannon that was published by the organization he founded, the Socialist Workers Party. [Cannon died in 1974.]
In the introduction the editors
motivate the purpose for the publication of the book by stating the Cannon was
the finest Communist leader that America had ever produced. This an intriguing
question. The editors trace their political lineage back to Cannon’s leadership
of the early Communist Party and later after his expulsion to the Trotskyist
Socialist Workers Party so their perspective is obvious. What does the
documentation provided here show? This certainly is the period of Cannon’s
political maturation, especially after his long collaboration working with
Trotsky. The period under discussion- from the 1920’s when he was a leader of
the American Communist Party to the red-baiting years after World War II-
started with his leadership of the fight against the degeneration of the
Russian Revolution and then later against those who no longer wanted to defend
the gains of the Russian Revolution despite the Stalinist degeneration of that
revolution. Cannon won his spurs in those fights and in his struggle to orient
those organizations toward a revolutionary path. One thing is sure- in his
prime which includes this period- Cannon had the instincts to want to lead a
revolution and had the evident capacity to do so. That he never had an
opportunity to lead a revolution is his personal tragedy and ours as well.
This volume is a compendium of Cannon’s speeches over most of his active political life beginning with his leadership role in the early American Communist Party and his secondary role in the Communist International. Some of the selections are also available in other parts of the series mentioned above. I would also note here that in contrast to his "Notebook of an Agitator" the pieces here tend to be longer and based on more general socialist principles. The socialist movement has always emphasized two ways of getting its message out- propaganda and agitation. The selections here represent a more propagandistic approach to that message. Many of the presentations hold their own even today in 1972 [and in 2015] as thoughtful expositions of the aims of socialism and how to struggle for it. I particularly draw the reader’s attention to "Sixty Years of American Radicalism" a speech given in 1959 in which Cannon draws a general overview of the ebbs and flows of the socialist movement from the turn of the 20th century until then. At that time Cannon also predicted a new radical upsurge which did occur shortly thereafter [the blazing 1960s of Sam, Frank and my youth.] but unfortunately has long since ended.
Cannon’s speech correctly marks the great divide in the American socialist movement at World War I and the socialist response American participation in that war and subsequently to the Russian Revolution. Prior to that time socialist activity was a loose, federated affair driven by a more evolutionary approach to ultimate socialist success i.e. reformism. That trend was symbolized by the work of the great socialist leader, Eugene V. Debs. While that approach had many, ultimately, fatal flaws it did represent a solid attempt to draw a class struggle line for independent (from the capitalist parties) political action by the working class.
Drawing on those lessons the early Communist Party, basing itself on support of the Russian Revolution, became dominant on the American left by expanding on that concept. That is, until the mid-1930’s after it had already long been an agency under orders from Moscow in support, by one means or another, of the Rooseveltian Democratic Party, a capitalist party. That was fatal to long term prospects for independent working class political action and Cannon has harsh words for the party’s policy. He also noted that the next upsurge would have to right that policy by again demanding an independent political expression for the working class. Unfortunately, when that radical upsurge did occur in the 1960’s and early 1970’s the party that he formed, the Socialist Workers Party, essentially replicated in the anti-Vietnam War movement and elsewhere the Communist Party’s class collaborationist policy with the remnants of American liberalism. Obviously, as a man in his sixties Cannon was no longer able or willing to fight against that policy by the party that he had created. Thus, the third wave of radicalism also ebbed and the American Left declined. Nevertheless this speech is Cannon’s legacy to the youth today. [2015] A new upsurge, and it will come, must learn this lesson and fight tooth and nail for independent political expression for the working class to avoid another failure.
This volume is a compendium of Cannon’s speeches over most of his active political life beginning with his leadership role in the early American Communist Party and his secondary role in the Communist International. Some of the selections are also available in other parts of the series mentioned above. I would also note here that in contrast to his "Notebook of an Agitator" the pieces here tend to be longer and based on more general socialist principles. The socialist movement has always emphasized two ways of getting its message out- propaganda and agitation. The selections here represent a more propagandistic approach to that message. Many of the presentations hold their own even today in 1972 [and in 2015] as thoughtful expositions of the aims of socialism and how to struggle for it. I particularly draw the reader’s attention to "Sixty Years of American Radicalism" a speech given in 1959 in which Cannon draws a general overview of the ebbs and flows of the socialist movement from the turn of the 20th century until then. At that time Cannon also predicted a new radical upsurge which did occur shortly thereafter [the blazing 1960s of Sam, Frank and my youth.] but unfortunately has long since ended.
Cannon’s speech correctly marks the great divide in the American socialist movement at World War I and the socialist response American participation in that war and subsequently to the Russian Revolution. Prior to that time socialist activity was a loose, federated affair driven by a more evolutionary approach to ultimate socialist success i.e. reformism. That trend was symbolized by the work of the great socialist leader, Eugene V. Debs. While that approach had many, ultimately, fatal flaws it did represent a solid attempt to draw a class struggle line for independent (from the capitalist parties) political action by the working class.
Drawing on those lessons the early Communist Party, basing itself on support of the Russian Revolution, became dominant on the American left by expanding on that concept. That is, until the mid-1930’s after it had already long been an agency under orders from Moscow in support, by one means or another, of the Rooseveltian Democratic Party, a capitalist party. That was fatal to long term prospects for independent working class political action and Cannon has harsh words for the party’s policy. He also noted that the next upsurge would have to right that policy by again demanding an independent political expression for the working class. Unfortunately, when that radical upsurge did occur in the 1960’s and early 1970’s the party that he formed, the Socialist Workers Party, essentially replicated in the anti-Vietnam War movement and elsewhere the Communist Party’s class collaborationist policy with the remnants of American liberalism. Obviously, as a man in his sixties Cannon was no longer able or willing to fight against that policy by the party that he had created. Thus, the third wave of radicalism also ebbed and the American Left declined. Nevertheless this speech is Cannon’s legacy to the youth today. [2015] A new upsurge, and it will come, must learn this lesson and fight tooth and nail for independent political expression for the working class to avoid another failure.
No comments:
Post a Comment