From The New Soldiers Under The Bridge Series-The Iraq And Afghan War Soldiers-
Brother Jacob’s Last Stand
From The Pen Of Frank Jackman:
A while back, maybe a couple of
years ago now, I did a retrospective series of sketches under the working title
of Brothers Under The Bridge about
guys, about war veterans, Vietnam War veterans that I had started in the late
1970s under the title Going To The
“Jungle, a title which reflected the jungles of Vietnam from where they had
been and the subsequent hobo jungle where they wound up. I did not have a chance
to complete that series since the publication that I was writing them for out
in California, the East Bay Eye, like a lot of alternative media
operations folded up as the 1960s went into a deep ebb tide and the audience for
such journals went back to the professions, academia, and bourgeois politics.
Those sketches centered on some groups of returning veterans who could not cope
with the “real” world after Vietnam and had built themselves an alternate
“community” mostly down in Southern California and who by life’s circumstances later
got called the “brothers under the bridge.”
Let me reproduce in part my motivation
for that latter series because now for different reasons I am finding out
stories about guys and gals from the recent Iraq and Afghan occupations that
also can’t cope with the “real” world and are forming, well, I don’t know
exactly what they are forming but I damn well know it feels a lot like that long
ago “brothers under the bridge.”:
“In the first installment of this
series of sketches I mentioned, in grabbing an old Bruce Springsteen CD
compilation from 1998 to download into my iPod, that I had come across a song
that stopped me in my tracks, Brothers Under The Bridge. I had not
listened to or thought about that song for a long time but it brought back many
memories from the mid-1970s when I did a series of articles for the now defunct
East Bay Eye (Frisco town, California East Bay, naturally) on the fate
of some troubled Vietnam veterans who, for one reason or another, could not
come to grips with “going back to the real world” and took, like those a Great
Depression generation or two before them, to the “jungle”-the hobo, bum, tramp
camps located along the abandoned railroad sidings, the ravines and crevices,
and under the bridges of California, mainly down Los Angeles way, and created
their own “society.”
The editor of the East Bay Eye,
Owen Anderson, gave me that long ago assignment after I had done a smaller
series for the paper on the treatment, the poor treatment, of Vietnam veterans
by the Veterans Administration in San Francisco and in the course of that
series had found out about this band of brothers roaming the countryside trying
to do the best they could, but mainly trying to keep themselves in one piece.
My qualifications for the assignment other than empathy for fellow veterans
since I had been in the military, grudgingly, during the Vietnam War period
although not in combat were based simply on the fact that back East I had been
involved, along with several other radicals, in running an anti-war GI
coffeehouse near Fort Devens in Massachusetts and another one down near Fort
Dix in New Jersey. During that period I had run into many soldiers of my 1960s
generation who had clued me in on the psychic cost of the war so I had a
running start.
After making connections with some
Vietnam Veterans Against The War (VVAW) guys down in L.A. who I had worked with
after my own military service was over knew where to point me I was on my way.
I gathered many stories, published some of them in the Eye, and put the
rest in my helter-skelter files. A while back, after having no success in
retrieving the old Eye archives on the Internet, I went up into my attic
and rummaged through what was left of those early files. I could find no
newsprint articles that I had written but I did find a batch of notes,
specifically notes from stories that I didn’t file because the Eye went
under before I could round them into shape.
The ground rules of those long ago
stories was that I would basically let the guy I was talking to give his spiel,
spill what he wanted the world to hear, and I would write it up without too
much editing (mainly for foul language). I, like with the others in this
current series, have reconstructed this story as best I can although at this
far remove it is hard to get the feel of the voice and how things were said.
Not every guy I interviewed, came
across, swapped lies with, or just snatched some midnight phrase out of the air
from was from hunger. Most were, yes, in one way or another but some had no
real desire to advertise their own hunger but just wanted to get something off
their chest about some lost buddy, or some event they had witnessed. I have
presented enough of these sketches both back in the day and here to not make a
generalization about what a guy might be hiding in the deep recesses of his
mind.
Some wanted to give a blow by blow
description of every firefight (and every hut torched) they were involved in,
others wanted to blank out ‘Nam completely and talk of before or after times,
or talk about the fate of some buddy, some ‘Nam buddy, who maybe made it back to
the “real world” but got catch up with stuff he couldn’t handle, or got caught
up in some stuff himself that he couldn’t handle, couldn’t handle because his
whole blessed life pointed the other way…”
With that introduction now, after
having recently as a favor to an old high school classmate tried to find his
son, Jack, who served in both Afghanistan and Iraq and upon discharge got
caught up in some stuff he could not handle, another generation of soldiers
needs to be heard, need their stories told. In the old series I noted that I
liked to finish up these introductions by placing the sketches under a
particular sign; no question Brother Jacobs’s sign is the sign of the last
stand.
This sketch is slightly different
from a previous one about Private Jack Dawson’s private war in the aftermath of
his service in Iraq and Afghanistan where I knew many details about his life
from his father, an old high school classmate of mine, and later Jack himself
when I found him down in Southern California. In the case of Brother Jacob I
only know from a few chance meetings with him down at Fort Meade and what was
presented in his on-line memorial from the Chelsea Manning Support Network
about his life. I do know this though that Brother Jacob automatically rates a
nod (the old school days “nod” that signified that a guy who you did not know,
was not one of your corner boys but who you maybe played some pick-up game
against, maybe had in class was “cool”) for his early and fervent support for
his fellow soldier, Chelsea Manning (formerly known as Bradley), who was in a
heap of trouble with the American government and its military of which she was
part for leaking lots of information about American atrocities in Iraq and
other information that the government would rather not have us know about on
the vital questions of war and peace.
Brother Jacob like many ex-soldiers,
myself included, came to Chelsea’s aid once he got “religion” on what seven
kinds of hell the American government was up to in Iraq (and Afghanistan). Brother Jacob was, as we in Veterans for
Peace and other ex-soldier supporters, just following the old adage learned
early on in basic training-you do not leave your buddy behind. And Brother
Jacob and the rest of us will not leave Chelsea behind to face that thirty-five
year sentence alone. Now we have Brother Jacob’s memory to honor as we continue
our work.
Brother Jacob, Presente!, yeah, Brother Jacob, Presente !
WHY SO MANY DOCTRINES? BY STEVE FINNELL
ReplyDeleteWhy are there so many different doctrines taught in churches that claim to be churches of the Lord Jesus Christ? One reason is that the majority of those who claim Jesus as Lord and Savior do not believe that the Bible is the accurate word of God. That is an undeniable fact.
If you do not trust that the Bible is the accurate word of God, then you are at the mercy of denominational church teachings. Are Bible commentaries, church creed books, and books written about the Bible more trustworthy than the Bible?
Proverbs 30:5 Every word of God is pure; He is a shield to those who put their trust in Him. (NKJV)
When men deny that the Bible is God's accurate word, how can they put their trust in Him? They are by default putting their trust in church leaders, church creed books, Bible commentaries, and other extra-Scriptural sources.
Proverbs 30:6 Do not add to His words, Lest He reprove you, and you be found a liar.(NKJV)
If you are trusting a church creed book that changes the word of God, will you be reproved by God and found to be a liar? If your creed book does not change the teachings of the Bible, then why would you need a creed book? Why not simply trust the written word of God?
In the final analysis men have to trust the Bible to be the accurate word of God or they have to trust man-made doctrines as their rules for faith and practice.
YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com