On The Anniversary Of The Fall Of Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City)-Vietnam At The End- No Black-Bordered Obituary For War Criminal Kennedy/Johnson Secretary Of War Robert S. McNamara
From The Pen Of Frank Jackman
Sometimes a picture is in fact
better than one thousand words. In this case the famous, or infamous depending
on one’s view, photograph of the last American “refugees” being evacuated by
helicopter from the American Embassy rooftop in Saigon (now, mercifully, Ho Chi
Minh City) tells more about that episode of American imperial hubris that most
books. That clinging mass of blurry figures dragging, fighting, pushing to get
that last out before the NVA swooped down in a flash and closed down the old
shop. Books that spent thousands of words talking about “domino theories, red
menaces, communist hegemony, and sticking it to the Soviets by a little proxy
war in far off rice fields.
Recently I reviewed Frank Snepp’s
book about Vietnam at the end of the war, Indecent
Interval , where I noted “as is the case with this little gem of a book,
ex- CIA man Frank Snepp’s insider account of that fall from the American side,
it is nice to have some serious analytical companionship to that photo
[helicopter rescues off the Embassy rooftop]. Moreover, a book that gives numerous details
about what happened to who in those last days in a little over five hundred
pages. Naming names about who the good guys and bad guys really were (from the
American imperial perspective). Especially now, as two or three later
generations only see Vietnam through the hoary eyes of old veterans, both
military and radical anti-war, from that period like me (a veteran in both
senses) to tell the tale.”
And such histories, memoirs and
remembrances help to get a fix on that Vietnam episode in the lives of many of
the young in that time. Sometimes though the story of war, about what happened
before the whole edifice came crashing down, can be told another way, in a more
personal way. Who knows in one hundred years the book below may present the
more important story.
*******
No Black-Bordered Obituary For War Criminal Kennedy/Johnson Secretary Of War Robert S. McNamara
Commentary (July 6, 2009)
The recent death, at 93, of
Kennedy/Johnson Vietnam War-era War Secretary Robert McNamara has been met with
a number of tributes in the bourgeois media about his role as architect of
various Cold War military policies in defense of the American Imperial state.
That is to be expected for those sources. There is, apparently, an unwritten
rule that one does not speak ill of the dead in those circles. Including
legitimate war criminals. And in the normal course of events that might be an
appropriate response. But one Robert Strange McNamara is of a different stripe.
After a life time of public service
to the bourgeois state Mr. McNamara, seemingly, late in life started to worry
about his eternal soul and the harm that he had done to it by trying, as an
example, to wipe the country of Vietnam, North and South at the time, off the
face of the earth with his incessant strategic bombing policy. After exhibiting
some qualms late in the Johnson presidency (and around the time of TET 1968) he
was booted upstairs to become President of the American-dominated World Bank.
Nice soft landing for a war criminal, right?
And who called him a war criminal?
Well, of course, this writer did (and does). And so did many of the anti-war
activists of the 1960’s. Those calls are to be expected (and might be
considered to constitute a minimum response to his egregious policies). But,
surprise, surprise late in life, after serious reflection, McNamara implied,
haltingly to be sure, in his memoirs (a review of which is re-posted below) that
that might have been the case. However, unlike some of his compadres at the
Nuremberg War Crimes tribunals and other such venues, Mr. McNamara died quietly
in his bed.
Not so fortunate were the millions
of Vietnamese peasants and workers who bore the onslaught of the maximum
fire-power the American military could lay down. No, there will be no final
justice in this sorry old world until a future American Workers Republic pays
real justice (and serious cash) to the people of Vietnam. As for Robert Strange
McNamara, if the worst that happened to him was a “bad conscience” he got off
easy.
******
Reposted below is a review of Robert
Strange McNamara’s memoirs and of a documentary “Fog Of War” used by him in
order to help “the second draft” of history of his legacy.
Reposted From April 30, 2009 Entry
The Fog Of War, Part II- War
Secretary Robert McNamara’s View Of His Handiwork in Vietnam
Book Review
In Retrospect: The Tragedy And Lessons Of Vietnam, Robert Strange McNamara with Brain VanDeMark, Random House, 1995
Book Review
In Retrospect: The Tragedy And Lessons Of Vietnam, Robert Strange McNamara with Brain VanDeMark, Random House, 1995
Anyone who had caught the Friday
March 27, 2009 headlines is aware that the Democratic Party-run Obama
government has called for some 4,000 additional troops for Afghanistan and what
they, euphemistically, call civilian support teams in order to bolster the
sagging regime of “Mayor of Kabul” Karzai. Those numbers are in addition to the
17,000 extras already committed by the Obama regime in February. Does the word
escalation seem appropriate here?
One of the problems of having gone
through the Vietnam experience in my youth (including periods of lukewarm
support for American policy under John F. Kennedy, a hands-off attitude in the
early Lyndon B. Johnson years and then full-bore opposition under the late
Johnson, Richard M. Nixon and Gerald Ford regimes) is a tendency to view
today’s American imperial policy in the same by-the-numbers approach as I took
as a result of observing the Vietnam War as it unfolded. There are differences,
some of them hugely so, between Vietnam and Afghanistan. Just as, I have
previously noted in this space, there are differences between Vietnam and the
recently “completed” Iraq War. (Hey, I’m just going by what the media tells me
is going on. They wouldn’t lead us astray, would they?)
But, I keep getting this eerie
feeling in the back of my neck every time I hear, or see, anything concerning
Afghanistan coming out of this new Obama administration. They appear clueless,
yet are determined to forge ahead with this policy that can only lead to the
same kind of quagmire than Vietnam and Iraq turned into. That is where the
analogies to Vietnam do connect up. In this regard, I have recently been
re-reading Kennedy/Johnson War Secretary Robert Strange (that’s his middle
name, folk, I didn’t make it up and didn’t need to) McNamara’s memoirs, written
in 1995, of his central role in the development of Vietnam policy, “In
Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam”.
Obviously McNamara has put his own
‘spin’ on his personal role then in order to absolve himself (a little) before
history. That is to be expected. What comes through crystal clear, however,
because in the final analysis McNamara still doesn’t get it, is that when
you’re the number one imperial power all the decisions you make are suppose to
fall into place for your benefit because you represent the “good guys”.
Regardless of what you do, or do not, know about the internal workings of the
situation at hand. The Kennedy/Johnson administrations were almost totally
ignorant of the internal working of Vietnamese society. That is why I have that
eerie, very eerie, feeling about this Obama war policy.
In the normal course of events
former high level bureaucrats in American presidential administrations usually
save their attempts at self-justification for high ticket published memoirs or
congenial `softball' speaking tours and conferences. In short, they prefer to
preach to the choir at retail prices. Apparently, Cold Warrior extraordinaire
Secretary of War Robert Strange McNamara felt that such efforts were very
necessary in his case and hence he had to go to the prints in order to
whitewash his role in the history of his times. Despite an apparent agreement
with his “ghost writer” not to cover certain subjects and be allowed to present
his story his way it is always good to catch a view of how the other side
operates. It ain't pretty.
After a lifetime of relative public
silence, at the age of 8o something, McNamara decided to give his take on
events in which he was a central figure like dealing with the fact of American
imperial military superiority in the post- World War II period, dealing with
the Russians and the fight for American nuclear superiority during the Cold
War, the ill-conceived Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, the later Cuban Missile
crisis and above all his role in the escalation of the wars in Southeast Asia,
primarily Vietnam.
Very little here focuses on his time
at the World Bank, a not unimportant omission that would highlight my point
that he might have changed his clothing in the course of his career but not his
mindset. While those of us interested in learning the lessons of history have
long understood that to know the political enemy is the beginning of wisdom one
will not find much here that was not infinitely better covered by the late
journalist David Halberstam in his classic “The Best and The Brightest”.
McNamara has chosen to present his
story in the form of parables, or rather, little vignettes about the “lessons”
to be drawn from experiences (eleven in all by the way). Thus, we are asked to
sit, embarrassingly, through McNamara's freshman course in revisionist history
as he attempts to take himself from the cold-hearted Cold Warrior and
legitimate “war criminal” to the teddy-bearish old man who has learned
something in his life- after a lifetime of treachery. Yet, like that freshman
course there are things to be learned despite the professor and more to learn,
if only by reading between the lines, than he or she wanted to express.
McNamara presents his take by
dividing the Vietnam War buildup, at least at the executive level, into
periods; the early almost passive Kennedy days; the post Kennedy assassination
period when Lyndon Johnson was trying to be all things to all men; the decisive
post-1964 election period; and, various periods of fruitless and clueless
escalation. It is this process that is, almost unwittingly, the most important
to take from this world. Although McNamara, at the time of writing was an older
and wiser man, when he had power he went along with ever step of the “hawks”,
civilian and military. He led no internal opposition, and certainly not public
one. This is the classic “good old boys” network where one falls on one’s sword
when the policy turns wrong. And he is still scratching his head over why
masses of anti-war protesters chanted “war criminal” when they confronted him
with his deeds. And then listen to the latest screeds by current War Secretary
Gates concerning Afghanistan. It will sound very familiar.
In the end, if one took his story at
face value, one could only conclude that he was just trying to serve his bosses
the best way he could and if things went wrong it was their fault. Nothing new
there, though. Henry Kissinger has turned that little devise into an art form.
Teary-eyed at the end McNamara might be as he acknowledges his role in the mass
killings of his time, but beware of a wolf in sheep's clothing. Yet, you need
to read this book if you want to understand how these guys (and gals) defended
their state then, and now.
DVD REVIEW
The Fog of War, starring former Secretary of War Robert Strange McNamara, 2003
The Fog of War, starring former Secretary of War Robert Strange McNamara, 2003
In the normal course of events
former high level bureaucrats in American presidential administrations usually
save their attempts at self-justification for high ticket published memoirs or
congenial `softball' speaking tours and conferences. In short, they prefer to
preach to the choir at retail prices. Apparently, former Kennedy and Johnson
Administration Cold Warrior extraordinaire Secretary of War Robert Strange
McNamara felt that such efforts were not enough and hence he had to go before
the cameras in order to whitewash his role in the history of his times. Despite
an apparent agreement with his interviewer not to cover certain subjects and be
allowed to present his story his way it is always good to catch a view of how
the other side operates. It ain't pretty.
After a lifetime of relative public
silence, at the age of 85, McNamara decided to give his take on events in which
he was a central figure like dealing with the fact of American imperial
military superiority in the post- World War II period, dealing with the
Russians and the fight for American nuclear superiority during the Cold War,
the ill-conceived Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, the later Cuban Missile crisis
and above all his role in the escalation of the wars in Southeast Asia,
primarily Vietnam.
Very little here focuses on his time
at the World Bank, a not unimportant omission that would highlight my point
that he might have changed his clothing in the course of his career but not his
mindset. While those of us interested in learning the lessons of history have
long understood that to know the political enemy is the beginning of wisdom one
will not find much here that was not infinitely better covered by the late
journalist David Halberstam in his classic The Best and The Brightest.
McNamara has chosen to present his
story in the form of parables, or rather, little vignettes about the `lessons'
to be drawn from experiences. Thus, we are asked to sit, embarrassingly,
through McNamara's Freshman course in revisionist history as he attempts to
take himself from the cold-hearted Cold Warrior and legitimate `war criminal'
to the teddy-bearish old man who has learned something in his life- after a
lifetime of treachery.
In the end, if one took his story at
face value, one could only conclude that he was just trying to serve his bosses
the best way he could and if things went wrong it was their fault. Nothing new
there, though. Henry Kissinger has turned that little devise into an art form.
Teary-eyed at the end McNamara might be as he acknowledges his role in the mass
killings of his time, but beware of a wolf in sheep's clothing. Yet, you need
to watch this film if you want to understand how these guys (and gals) defend
their state.