Friday, July 28, 2017

In Boston- Remembering Nagasaki: Welcoming the Nuclear Ban Treaty August 9 @ 6:00 pm - 7:30 pm First Church in Boston, 66 Marlborough St

Remembering Nagasaki: Welcoming the Nuclear Ban Treaty

August 9 @ 6:00 pm - 7:30 pm

First Church in Boston, 66 Marlborough St

An Evening of Reflection, Celebration and Rededication

Wednesday, August 9, 2017 – 6:30 pm

First Church in Boston, 66 Marlborough Street

Refreshments will be provided
Seventy two years have passed since the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) took effect 47 years ago, yet the five NPT nuclear weapons states have not taken serious action on their treaty commitments to nuclear disarmament. In the meantime, four more states have acquired nuclear weapons and the risks of their use have only increased over time.
To fill this legal and moral gap, the vast majority of non-nuclear states, under the auspices of the United Nations, adopted a new Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons on July 7.  The nine nuclear-armed states and their close allies boycotted the talks; it’s now up to us to convince them to comply with the ban treaty and eliminate nuclear weapons once and for all.
John Loretz will report on the campaign that led up to the Nuclear Ban Treaty and the upcoming plans to advance nuclear disarmament. John is Program Director of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and serves on the steering group of ICAN—the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.
Ashley Squires—a Masters student in Peace and Conflict studies at UMass Lowell and a Mass. Peace Action intern—attended the Ban Treaty Conference and will give her impressions on the conference and on the prospects for improved US/Russia relations and disarmament.
Angela Kim—a senior at Wellesley College and a Mass. Peace Action intern—will speak on the North Korean nuclear issue and on the impact of the 1945 nuclear bombs on Korean conscripted laborers who were working in Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the time.
Local musicians John Loretz and Anne Sandstrom will perform throughout the evening.
-- 
Cole Harrison
Executive Director
Massachusetts Peace Action
11 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
w: 617-354-2169
m: 617-466-9274
f: /masspeaceaction
t: @masspeaceaction
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MAPA Nuclear Disarmament" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mapa-nuclear-disarmament/CAKfC%2B3uiUgqwcrHDxGN%3D_8RMRw8dzmYhyM13mRYGu%2B%3DY3TB0yQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

From The Archives -The " A Dark Corner Of Camelot, Indeed- Secrets Of The Kennedy Administration And Cuba Stay Under Lock And Key- A News Story

Click on the headline to link to a Sunday Boston Globe, dated January 23, 2010, article concerning revelations about the Kennedy brothers (Jack and Bobby)and their machinations against the Castro regime in the early 1960s.

Markin comment:

Every time I get just the slightest bit misty-eyed over my youthful infatuation with the Kennedy brothers, John, in my didn’t know any better liberal days and later, in my conscious left-liberal days, Robert, something comes up to jolt me back to reality. And make me glad, glad as hell, that I broke with those kinds of politics long ago. This Boston Globe article concerning the machinations, conscious, imperialist machinations, by the brothers on the question of overthrowing the Castro regime in Cuba is the most recent jolt. I have mentioned previously that Cuba, and especially the defense of the Cuban revolution around the events of the Bay of Pigs invasion, represented something of an exception to my Kennedy admiration, and my liberal politics. And just to make sure that no one can accuse me of being misty-eyed today let me say this. The defense of the Cuban revolution starts with the defense of the Cuban Five. Defend The Cuban revolution! End the embargoes now! There I am well again.

From The Pen Of Joshua Lawrence Breslin- Humphrey Bogart’s Dead Reckoning- A Film Review

Click on the headline to link to a Wikipedia entry for the Humphrey Bogart film noir Dead Reckoning

DVD Review

Dead Reckoning, starring Humphrey Bogart, Lizabeth Scott, Columbia Pictures, 1947


Hey, Humphrey Bogart is no stranger to femme fatales, no stranger at all, heart of gold or heart of steel. He takes them where he finds. Like bewitching Lauren Bacall in their hot as it gets with clothes on, 1940s style sex sizzler, To Have Or To Have Not. Or Mary Astor and her bird dreams of gold fetish (and not above wasting more than a few guys with a few indiscreet slugs if they get in the way) in the film adaptation of Dashiell Hammett’s The Maltese Falcon. So old Bogie has certainly been around the block with some funny- thinking dames. Still he should have steered about eleven blocks clear of one Coral Chandler (played by husky-throated, pleading eyes daddy please just shot that guy for me please, Lizabeth Scott) and her, well, trigger-happy ways as put on display in the film under review, Dead Reckoning .

As it turns out this is not the first time Ms. Scott has tried to put a slug, or six, in more than one guy who got in her way. In a recently reviewed film noir in this space, Too Late For Tears, she played sweet Jane Palmer as a homicidal femme fatale with a big time lust for gold. But there she at least varied her routine up a little by just poisoning one guy (and probably driving another guy, her first hubby, to suicide). Here she has the six-guns blaring away. And still, to the very, very end guys were lining up, lining up with a grin on their faces just to get a whiff of that jasmine perfume . Jesus.

Let me explain a little why she had them running through hoops. Coral, a girl from the wrong side of the tracks, the hard Detroit tracks, stepped up a little in class and married a guy for his dough (no big deal there, gals, and guys, have been doing that since about the Stone Age), But she got tired of hubby and started running around with a college professor just before World War II. Problem? Yes, problem and so, whichever story she told that you believe, said hubby when south in a blaze of gunfire. The college professor took the fall for her, no questions asked, and with that now patented grin on his face just like every other guy. Fortunately (for a while) he skipped town.

That is where Captain Bogie comes in. Seems he and our professor saved the world for democracy over in Europe during WW II and they are to be feted with big time war medals for their efforts. Problem, yes, problem. Our professor can’t take the publicity and beats it back to the podunk town down South that he was from to work things out with Coral and maybe square himself with the law. No go. He ends up torched beyond recognition in some dark raven for his efforts. Bogie when he hears of this, being his superior officer and all, and well, just being Bogie in the 1940s, has to square things for his old buddy.

And he does about six bodies later (okay, okay maybe less). See he falls for Ms. Coral along the way (yah, even Bogie had that grin on his face) and tried to get her out from under whatever trouble she had told him she had with a certain nightclub owner who had the goods on her (and who had back in old Detroit days been her hubby) . But this will put paid to this case, grin or no grin. While the white knight Bogie is chasing bad guy night club owner out the door she is waiting in the rain, gun at the ready, to shoot whoever comes out first. Of course she thinks it will be, ah, Bogie. What did I say before, oh yah, Bogie stay eleven blocks away from Coral Chandler. Hell, forget that, stay a mile away. Got it.

From The Archives Of "Workers Vanguard"- On The 50th Anniversary Of The Bay Of Pigs- Defend The Cuban Revolution


In Honor of Anniversary Of The July 26th Movement


From The Pen Of Frank Jackman (2015)


Every leftist, hell, everybody who stands on the democratic principle that each nation has the right to self-determination should cautiously rejoice at the “defrosting” of the long-time diplomatic relations between the American imperial behemoth and the island of Cuba (and the freedom of the remaining Cuban Five in the bargain). Every leftist militant should understand that each non-capitalist like Cuba going back to the establishment of the now defunct Soviet Union has had the right (maybe until we win our socialist future the duty) to make whatever advantageous agreements they can with the capitalist world. That despite whatever disagreements we have with the political regimes ruling those non-capitalist states. That is a question for us to work out not the imperialists.

For those who have defended the Cuban Revolution since its victory in 1959 under whatever political rationale (pro-socialist, right to self-determination, or some other hands off policy) watching on black and white television the rebels entering Havana this day which commemorates the heroic if unsuccessful efforts at Moncada we should affirm our continued defense of the Cuban revolution. Oh yes, and tell the American government to give back Guantanamo while we are at it.    


Workers Vanguard No. 978
15 April 2011

Defend the Cuban Revolution!

(Quote of the Week)

Fifty years ago, the Spartacist League’s forebears in the Revolutionary Tendency (RT) of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) advanced the call to defend and extend the Cuban Revolution. In a document presented to the SWP’s youth group, the Young Socialist Alliance (YSA), the RT upheld the need for a Trotskyist party against the liquidationist trajectory of the SWP leadership, which uncritically hailed Castro’s petty-bourgeois forces as they were consolidating bureaucratic rule. Pointing out that the process in Cuba was that of the formation of a deformed workers state—i.e., a society akin to the Soviet Union under the Stalinist bureaucracy—the RT advanced a program of political revolution, which would open the road to Cuba’s further development toward socialism in conjunction with the fight for world proletarian revolution.

The full victory of every modern revolution, the Cuban revolution included, requires the emergence in a leading role of a mass revolutionary-Marxist party. The small Trotskyist groups, in Cuba and elsewhere, have a vital role as the nucleus of such parties. They can fill this role only if they continually preserve their political independence and ability to act, and if they avoid the peril of yielding to non-Marxist and non-proletarian leaderships their own ideological responsibilities and the historic mission of the working class.

In its relation to the Cuban revolution the YSA, like every revolutionary group, has two principal tasks:

a) To exert the utmost effort to defend the Cuban revolution not only against the military and other attacks of U.S. imperialism, but also against the political attacks of the social-democratic agents of imperialism.

b) To struggle for the development and extension of the Cuban revolution and against the attempts of counterrevolutionary Stalinism to corrupt the revolution from within. We seek to further this development and extension both by supporting revolutionary actions of the existing leadership and by constructively criticizing, openly and frankly, the mistakes and inadequacies of that leadership. Both to develop the Cuban revolution and to extend it throughout the Hemisphere, we base ourselves on the imperative necessity for the establishment of workers democracy and the formation of the mass party of revolutionary Marxism.

—“The Cuban Revolution,” December 1961, printed in Spartacist No. 2 (July-August 1964)
********
On The 50th Anniversary- Honor The Heroic Cuban Defenders At The Bay Of Pigs-Defend The Cuban Revolution!

Markin comment:

Those of us who came of age in the 1960s, especially those of us who cut our political teeth on defending, under one principle or another (right to national self-determination, socialist solidarity, general anti-imperialist agenda, etc.), the Cuban revolution that we were front row television witnesses to, cherish the memory of the heroic Cuban defenders at the Bay of Pigs. No one cried when the American imperial adventure was foiled and President John Kennedy (whatever else we felt about him then), egg on face, had to take responsibility for the fiasco.

Those of us who continue to adhere to the anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist, pro-socialist agenda, whatever our differences with the Cuban leadership, today can join in honoring those heroic fighters. Today is also a day to face the hard fact that we have had too few victories against the imperialist behemoth. The imperial defeat at the Bay of Pigs was however our victory. As today’s imperialist activity in Libya, painfully, testifies to those forces, however, have not gotten weaker in the past 50 years. So the lesson for today’s (and future) young militants is to honor our fallen forebears and realize that the beast can be defeated, if you are willing to fight it. Forward! Defend the Cuban Revolution! Defend Libya against the imperialist onslaught!

Thursday, July 27, 2017

The Nighttime Is The Right Time-With Fritz Lang’s Film Adaptation Of Clifford Odets’ “Clash By Night” In Mind

The Nighttime Is The Right Time-With Fritz Lang’s Film Adaptation Of Clifford Odets’ “Clash By Night” In Mind  




By Film Critic Emeritus Sam Lowell

No I am not here to look over somebody’s, some other reviewer’s shoulder now that Peter Paul Markin, the moderator on this site has let the cat out of the bag and told one and all that with my review of 1956’s Giant I was, as he put it, putting myself to pasture. Although I would not have put it that way a few more or less serious medical problems have required to back off a little on reviewing films, a task I have done now for over forty years-and will continue periodically to continue doing. Today though I am here to comment on a review of Clash By Night by one of the in-coming reviewers, Sandy Salmon, whom I have known for at least thirty years and have respected for his work as my co-worker at the American Film Gazette almost as long. At fitting commentary to that respect is that I have freely “stolen” plenty of stuff from his pithy reviews over years. So enough said about that.  


After reading Sandy’s review I also realized that I was not familiar with the film that was under review although as the regular readers know I live for film noir, or variations of it which I think is closer to the nut in Clash. So naturally I called him up to ask to borrow his copy of the DVD which he sent me a few days later and which I viewed a couple of days after that. No question as Sandy pointed out Clash is a little hidden gem of a film with the standout cast of Barbara Stanwyck, Paul Douglas, Robert Ryan, and a pre-iconic Marilyn Monroe. With top notch direction by Fritz Lang who knew how to set a mood from the beginning of a film to the end here with a close up look at the shoreline of Monterrey setting us up for the clashing waves to come-human clashing waves and with a screenplay by my old friend Artie Hayes from the hot pen of playwright Clifford Odets who before he turned 1950s red scare fink, snitch, sell-out did some very good work (interesting that most of the finks and slinkers like Elia Kazan, Langston Hughes, Josh White and a million others never did produce that much good work after they  went down on their knees before the American mammon  and guys like Dalton Trumbo, Dashiell Hammett and Howard Fast who carried their toothbrushes with them into the House Un-American Activities Committee’s witch-hunt tribunals lived to do some good work after the red scare blew away like dust).   

No question this film had a good pedigree, had the stuff that kept things moving along in the funny little human drama being played out among ordinary folk with ordinary dreams which got smashed up against  the real world. Sandy made some good points as he summarized the ploy-line for the reader.  I have no quarrel with that but what I want to do is highlight some things that Sandy, the soul of discretion, kind of fluffed. My take on what was going on with all that high-end dialogue that Artie produced to throw in the main characters’ mouths. 

For openers let’s call things by their right name, this Mae Doyle, the role played by Barbara Stanwyck, was nothing but a tramp, a drifter and nighty-taker. Sure she had some femme fatale qualities, Sandy was right to make a comparison with Phyllis, the wanton femme and man trap who put Walter Neff through the wringer in Double Indemnity also played by Ms. Stanwyck, but she was strictly from the wrong side of the tracks. Was bound to let some guy who just wanted a good-looking woman to fill his house with kids take the gaff.  Mae had come home to working class Monterrey after having been out in the big wide world and gotten her younger years dreams crushed. She was now world weary and wary looking for a safe port. Call me politically incorrect or culturally insensitive but once a tramp always a tramp.

Mae knew it, knew it all the time she was leading poor sap Jerry, the role played by Paul Douglas. She took a supposed tough guy, a guy who had been hardened by the sea and twisted him around in and out in two second flat once she got her hooks into him. Earl knew that, Earl played by Robert Ryan, knew from minute one that whatever play Jerry was making for Mae he, Earl, was going to go down and dirty under the silky sheets with her before he was done-wedding ring or no wedding ring. And guess what as you already know she, when she got bored with the frankly boring Jerry and his fucking fish smells, his goddam sardine aura, she was ready to blow town with the hunky Earl. Didn’t think twice about it even with a little child in the way. Yeah, Jerry was made for the role of cuckold, maybe deserved it for having, what did Sandy call him, oh yeah, the blinders on way before he found some silky negligees and come hither perfumes, gifts from Earl, hidden in her bureau drawer.       


Then he man’s up, man’s up when it is too late as they, Mae and Earl are ready to take a hike with that little baby in tow. Then Mae got cold feet, supposedly was mother-hungry for the child and was ready to do penance for her indiscretions. Earl had it right though, had Mae pegged as a tramp, as someone looking for next adventure. That is what makes the end of the film run false as she practically begs Jerry to take her back now that she had seen the light. Jesus what a sap. Earl said it best. If she didn’t go away with him then it would only be a matter of time before she got bored again with Jerry and took a walk, maybe came running back to him, him and the wild side of life. I bet six, two and even and will take on all-comers that she blows town before the next year is out. You heard it here first- a tramp is always a tramp-end of discussion. Nice first review here Sandy, good luck.      

Free Yvette Felarca -‘I won't stop’: Jailed activist blasts US crackdown on anti-Trump protesters-Build The Resistance Now!

Hi everybody,
I don't know much about this activist, but I thought you would be interested to see this article.
In solidarity,
Donald

Original article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/25/yvette-felarca-trump-protest-charges-activism?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

‘I won't stop’: Jailed activist blasts US crackdown on anti-Trump protesters

Exclusive: Yvette Felarca, who faces riot charges after participating in an anti-fascist demonstration, joins lawyers in warning over prosecutions nationwide
When Yvette Felarca exited her flight in Los Angeles, there were a dozen police officers waiting for her.
The 47-year-old teacher was handcuffed, jailed, and later, to her shock, charged with assault, inciting a riot and participating in a riot over her involvement in an anti-fascist demonstration at the California capitol more than a year ago.
“The charges are obviously politically motivated. It is clearly a witch-hunt,” Felarca told the Guardian in her first interview since she was released Thursday, on $25,000 bail after two nights in jail. “This is in response to the fact that the movement against Donald Trump is strong and the resistance is strong.”
Felarca is one of hundreds of anti-Trump activists across the US facing prosecution for protesting against the White House and white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups that have increasingly organized in public. The criminal cases – including many in which protesters could face decades in prison – has drawn accusations that the government is trampling on the first amendment and broadly targeting critics in an aggressive effort to silence them.
“We’ve seen a real crackdown on protest and dissent,” said Sam Menefee-Libey, a member of the Dead City Legal Posse, an activist group supporting the more than 200 protesters who were arrested and charged with serious felonies after protesting at Trump’s inauguration. “All branches of the criminal justice system are taking cues from the Trump administration … They’re trying to increase their power and be as punitive as they possibly can be.”
Felarca, a Berkeley teacher and longtime leader with the organization By Any Means Necessary (Bamn), was part of a group of activists gathered in Sacramento, California, on 26 June 2016 to protest a white nationalist rally. The event, organized by the Traditionalist Workers party, which has ties to neo-Nazis and skinheads, quickly devolved into a violent clash between the two sides, leaving seven people stabbed. One was affiliated with the Traditionalist Workers.
Advertisement
Shanta Driver, Felarca’s attorney and national chair of Bamn, said the white nationalists were armed aggressors and that police “allowed the Nazis and pro-Trump supporters to bludgeon and stab and cause the hospitalization of unarmed peaceful opponents of Donald Trump”.
Felarca, one of the most visible counter-protesters, said she was there to oppose the spread of white supremacy and hate speech.
Felarca, whose legal first name is Yvonne, has since been the subject of segments on Fox News, which has labeled her a “militant left-wing leader” and posted grainy footage of her clashes in Sacramento.
Speaking by phone from Los Angeles, Felarca said she was stabbed in the arm and hit in the head, requiring more than 20 stitches. It took her weeks to recover, she said.
A spokeswoman for the Sacramento prosecutor declined to comment on the cases, which were announced last week, with similar charges filed against two other counter-protesters and a man believed to be associated with the white nationalists. 
Felarca said she would not be intimidated: “One of the reasons I was arrested was to try to demoralize and scare me and other people from continuing to … oppose Trump and his neo-Nazi supporters. I’m certainly not going to stop organizing and speaking out.”The charges echo investigations and prosecutions of anti-Trump and progressive activists across the country, including cases in New Orleans, other parts of California and high-profile federal charges against Standing Rock activists who protested against the Dakota Access pipeline (which was backed by Trump).

The charges against presidential inauguration protesters in particular have raised concerns about the Trump administration targeting critics. The US attorney’s office for Washington DC has filed a wide range of charges against more than 200 people, including rioting, conspiracy, property destruction and assault on a police officer. Defense attorneys have argued that police kettled the protesters, essentially trapping and mass-arresting everyone in the area regardless of whether there was any evidence of wrongdoing.
Journalists, legal observers, medics and others were caught up in the arrests, though following a broad backlash, charges against some members of the media were dropped. Although 20 cases have been dismissed, most of the charges still stand, with defendants facing up to 75 years in prison.
“It’s a horrible overcharging to assume that 217 people did the exact same thing, and to charge them all with identical conduct flies in the face of common sense,” said Mark Goldstone, an attorney who has represented some of the protesters. “I’ve been doing this for 30-something years and I’ve never seen this happen.”
A spokesman for the US attorney’s office declined to comment.
Prosecutors have offered plea agreements to protesters, which could allow some to avoid prison time in exchange for admitting guilt, but the vast majority have pleaded not guilty and are headed to trial.
“There is no reason why trying to make the world a better place and trying to survive and help people in your community should be a crime,” said Olivia Alsip, a 24-year-old defendant. “I’m not going to plead guilty to anything when I was only trying to help.”
Alsip, a Chicago resident, rejected a deal that would have required her to plead to a misdemeanor, pay a $500 fine, do community service and be on probation.
As the cases drag on, defendants have suffered serious consequences, with some losing their jobs, Menefee-Libey said. Others have struggled to continue their activist work out of fear of jeopardizing their trials.
Erin Lemkey, another Washington DC protester facing decades in prison, said the cases resembled the kind of mass incarceration of activists that occurs in countries like Russia.
“I’m terrified of that happening here,” said the 35-year-old video editor, who lives in New York City. “This is real for a lot of people who do political protests around the world.”
Still, Lemkey said it was important to fight in court to prevent similar prosecutions by the US government moving forward: “They’re using the plea deals as a mechanism to make people submit to the state’s charges and accept their narrative.”

In Boston- Aug 9: Remembering Nagasaki: Welcoming the Nuclear Ban Treaty

1 attachment
Dear Nuclear Disarmament wg and Faith Communities network,

As part of Hiroshima/ Nagasaki week we have scheduled a memorial and educational event on the Ban Treaty as well as Russian and Korean nuclear issues, which will also have a musical component.  Please help to get the word out!  
The event is posted at http://masspeaceaction.org/event/remembering-nagasaki-welcoming-the-nuclear-ban-treaty/ and the printable flyer is attached.

We'll need help on the day with setup and refreshments - so, if you can attend, please RSVP to Shelagh or me.

Cole


Remembering Nagasaki: Welcoming the Nuclear Ban Treaty

August 9 @ 6:00 pm - 7:30 pm

An Evening of Reflection, Celebration and Rededication

Wednesday, August 9, 2017 – 6:30 pm

First Church in Boston, 66 Marlborough Street

Refreshments will be provided
Seventy two years have passed since the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) took effect 47 years ago, yet the five NPT nuclear weapons states have not taken serious action on their treaty commitments to nuclear disarmament. In the meantime, four more states have acquired nuclear weapons and the risks of their use have only increased over time.

To fill this legal and moral gap, the vast majority of non-nuclear states, under the auspices of the United Nations, adopted a new Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons on July 7.  The nine nuclear-armed states and their close allies boycotted the talks; it’s now up to us to convince them to comply with the ban treaty and eliminate nuclear weapons once and for all.

John Loretz will report on the campaign that led up to the Nuclear Ban Treaty and the upcoming plans to advance nuclear disarmament. John is Program Director of International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and serves on the steering group of ICAN—the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.

Ashley Squires—a Masters student in Peace and Conflict studies at UMass Lowell and a Mass. Peace Action intern—attended the Ban Treaty Conference and will give her impressions on the conference and on the prospects for improved US/Russia relations and disarmament.


Angela Kim—a senior at Wellesley College and a Mass. Peace Action intern—will speak on the North Korean nuclear issue and on the impact of the 1945 nuclear bombs on Korean conscripted laborers who were working in Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the time.



Local musicians John Loretz and Anne Sandstrom will perform throughout the evening.
-- 
Cole Harrison
Executive Director
Massachusetts Peace Action
11 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
w: 617-354-2169
m: 617-466-9274
f: /masspeaceaction
t: @masspeaceaction
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MAPA Nuclear Disarmament" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mapa-nuclear-disarmament@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mapa-nuclear-disarmament/CAKfC%2B3smfkde6wPrp%3Dim0h-aABnpvsdd0CwyY-YeYxkn-zck8g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

In Boston-July 29th- Seeds of Solidarity: Affirming Life in Venezuela

Seeds of Solidarity: Affirming Life in Venezuela

When: Saturday, July 29, 2017, 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm 
Where: encuentro 5 • 9 Hamilton Place • Boston 

Affirming Life in Venezuela, Seeds of Solidarity

Sat. July 29, 2017 – 4PM – at encuentro5, 9A Hamilton Pl., Boston, MA
Program:
* Sergio Reyes, Musical introduction. The music of Ali Primera
* Omar Sierra, Venezuelan Consulate, Report on Situation in Venezuela
* Video: Seeds of Solidarity, a report from Venezuela about their food sovereignty efforts and the importance of our people-to-people solidarity
* Jorge Marin, Our committee work against U.S. intervention in Venezuela
Seeds of Solidarity for Venezuela, a project of the Venezuela Solidarity Committee of Boston, is committed to supporting a growing grassroots movement in Venezuela that has emerged with the goal to achieve food sovereignty. We provide organic heirloom seeds to farmer organizations and urban agricultural collectives that are involved in self-reliance and food security initiatives in low income rural and peri-urban areas of Venezuela’s Lara State.
This is a people-to-people campaign.
Co-Sponsored by the International Action Center, CISPES Boston, the July 26 Coalition, Encuentro5, Chelsea Uniting Against the War, Socialist Party, Party for Socialism and Liberation, Communist Party – Boston Branch, Boston May Day Coalition, United for Justice with Peace, Alliance for a Secular and Democratic South Asia
Upcoming Events: 
Newsletter: 

In Boston- Solidarity with the people of Venezuela - 7/29

1 attachment
Program:
* Sergio Reyes, Musical introduction. The music of Ali Primera
* Omar Sierra, Venezuelan Consulate, Report on Situation in Venezuela
* Video: Seeds of Solidarity, a report from Venezuela about their food sovereignty efforts and the importance of our people-to-people solidarity
* Jorge Marin, Our committee work against U.S. intervention in Venezuela
Seeds of Solidarity for Venezuela, a project of the Venezuela Solidarity Committee of Boston, is committed to supporting a growing grassroots movement in Venezuela that has emerged with the goal to achieve food sovereignty. We provide organic heirloom seeds to farmer organizations and urban agricultural collectives that are involved in self-reliance and food security initiatives in low income rural and peri-urban areas of Venezuela’s Lara State.
This is a people-to-people campaign.