Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Smedley Stand-out in support of Cambridge Friends Meeting Sunday, April 16 11:00 -12:00


Smedley Stand-out in support of Cambridge Friends Meeting 
Sunday, April 16  11:00 -12:00
Textron, 201 Lowell St. (Route 129) Wilmington MA, one mile west of Interstate 93, Exit 38
 
Smedleys,
Textron discontinued cluster bomb production last month.  For the past seven years Cambridge Friends Meeting  has held a monthly silent prayer vigil at Textron's Wilmington facility and this coming Sunday (yes Easter) will be their last. 
Textron is at 201 Lowell St. on the south side of the street.    Across the street at 226 Lowell St. there is plenty  of parking.   Quakers will set up two rows of facing chairs on the sidewalk in front of Textron for an hour of silent prayer.  Smedleys with flags flying (Forecast: wind 14 mph, 81 degrees, partly cloudy)  can stand in silent vigil along the sidewalk at a modest distance.
Hopefully there will be at least half a dozen interested  Smedleys.   If you can join please let Phil Noyce know to be sure he brings enough flags.  phil@macafrica.com  or 978-275-9830.

Textron Sensor Fused Weapons:
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SmedleyVFP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Smedleyvfp+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

April 13: David Swanson on U.S. Never-Ending War in the Time of Trump and How to Stop It

U.S. Never-Ending War in the Time of Trump and How to Stop It

When: Thursday, April 13, 2017, 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm

Where: Friends Meeting House • 5 Longfellow Park • Cambridge

Presentation by David Swanson followed by discussion and book signing.

<http://justicewithpeace.org/sites/default/files/files/u414/david_swanson.png>

David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is director of <http://worldbeyondwar.org/> WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for <http://rootsaction.org/> RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include <http://warisalie.org/> War <http://warisalie.org/> Is A Lie. He blogs at <http://davidswanson.org/> DavidSwanson.org and <http://warisacrime.org/> WarIsACrime.org. He hosts <http://davidswanson.org/taxonomy/term/41> Talk Nation Radio. He is a 2015, 2016, 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.

<http://davidswanson.org/warisalie> War Is A Lie: Second Edition(2016) -- widely praised best-selling classic. "WAR IS A LIE is a thorough refutation of every major argument used to justify wars, drawing on evidence from numerous past wars, with a focus on those wars that have been most widely defended as just and good. This is a handbook of sorts, a manual to be used in debunking future lies before future wars have a chance to begin.

Thursday, April 13, 7:00 PM
Friends Meeting at Cambridge
5 Longfellow Park
Cambridge, MA 02138

Boston Socialist Unity Project Conference 2017, 4/21-22

Boston Socialist Unity Project Conference 2017
Friday Evening & Saturday, April 21st  & 22nd @ MIT
BostonSocialistUnity.org || Facebook Event

The 2nd annual Boston Socialist Unity Project Conference (BSUP2) is a powerhouse of ideas and organizing!

The opening night event features Barbara Madeloni (Union President, Massachusetts Teachers Association) and Eugene Puryear (Millions for Prisoners). Boston’s own Foundation Movement, conscious hip hop artists, open the evening and Swiss-based Mat Callahan and Yvonne Moore bring Irish revolutionary songs to the closing. [Friday, April 21, 2017 @ 7:00 p.m.MIT Building 34-10150 Vassar Street]

On Saturday (9-5 pm) Sherri Mitchell (Land Peace Foundation) and Fred Magdoff (University of Vermont) connect indigenous organizing and environmental movements with the struggles to get beyond capitalism and build socialist movements. Our lunchtime plenary presents political strategies for challenging the system: it features the Democratic Socialists of America, the Green-Rainbow Party,Our Revolution, and the Socialist Party (list in formation).
With recent US armed action in Syria, Vijay Prashad’s closing plenary speech on Imperialism could not be more important and timely!

Two sessions of five to six participatory workshops will showcase movement-building work and feature many of our plenary speakers (Mitchell, Magdoff, Prashad, and Puryear). It will also draw in some of the most important and exemplary movement work being performed by City Life/Vida Urbana, the Freedom Road Socialist Organization, the Boston Institute for Non-Profit Journalism, MIT’s Student Activist Coalition, and Socialists on Single-Payer. Their topics include indigenous organizing and solidarity, housing and the city, education, media organizing, building movements for racial justice, the peace movement, and imperialism.

Breakfast and lunch options available with MIT vendors, Food for Activists, and Food Not Bombs.

Everyone is welcome, $10 suggested donation (online); nobody turned away for lack of funds.
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BostonUNAC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bostonunac+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance!

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance! 

Frank Jackman comment; 

We can be all over the place on our opinions about what is happening in Syria-who to support-or not support- but one thing is crystal clear we must oppose any United States war escalations. Those of us in the United States have a special duty to oppose the main enemy of the peoples of the world.    



Here is another view from the left -

*"REDS"-The Movie-"Radical Chic"-The John Reed-Louise Bryant Romance

"REDS"-The Movie-"Radical Chic"-The John Reed-Louise Bryant Romance

Click on title to link to YouTube's film clip of a trailer on "Reds"

DVD REVIEW











REDS, THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION (ORIGINALLY RELEASED IN 1981)

The important contribution of John Reed to the revolutionary movement here in America before World War I and later during the Russian revolution and its aftermath has never been fully appreciated. Thus, Warren Beatty, whatever his personal motives, has done a great service in filming the life of this “traitor to his class” (and his Harvard Class of 1910) and partisan of the international working class.

As usual with such commercial enterprises the order of things gets switched in the wrong direction. The love affair between Reed (played by Beatty) and budding writer and early feminist Louise Bryant (played by Diane Keaton)(and a little third party intervention by playwright Eugene O’Neill, played by Jack Nicholson) is set against the backdrop of the Russian Revolution not the other way around, but such is cinematic license. More than most film depictions this one mainly gets the story straight; Reed's early free-lance journalism tied to the Mexican Revolution; the bohemian life of pre-World War I Greenwich Village in New York City including it patronage by socialites like Mabel Dodge; the socialist fight against American participation in World War I; the fight among socialists (and anarchists) over support to the Russian Revolution; and, an interesting segment on the seemingly bewildering in-fighting in the early communist movement between the foreign-language federations and the Reed-led “Natives” (which included James P. Cannon,later a founder of American Trotskyism)that that ultimately had to be 'resolved' at Communist International headquarters in Moscow.

Those ‘natives’, the likes of Earl Browder, James Cannon and William Z. Foster, in the course of events would form the leadership of the party through most of the twenties when the cadre still wanted to make a revolution here and not just cheer on the Russian Revolution from afar. A nice touch in the film is the interweaving of commentaries by those, friend and foe, who knew or knew of Reed or were around during this time. See this movie.

THE GERMAN REVOLUTION OF 1923


THE GERMAN REVOLUTION OF 1923




COMMENTARY

A proper perspective on the question of the failed German revolutionary socialist opportunities starting in 1918 after the debacle of German defeat in World War I, the overthrow of the Kaiser and the establishment of a democratic republic until 1923 with the failure of the revolutionary opportunities resulting from the French reparations crisis is the subject of on-going controversy among revolutionaries. At that time most European revolutionaries, especially the Russians, placed their strategic aspirations on the success of those efforts in Germany. A different outcome during that period, with the establishment of a German Workers Republic, would have changed the course of world history in many ways, not the least of which would have been the probable saving of the isolated Russian socialist revolution and defeating German fascism in the embryo.

Since then, beginning with the Trotsky-led Russian Left Opposition in 1923 and later the International Left Opposition, revolutionaries as well as others have cut their teeth on developing an analysis of the failure of revolutionary leadership as a primary cause for that aborted German revolution. Against that well-known analysis, more recently a whole cottage industry has developed, particularly around the British journal Revolutionary History, giving encouragement to latter day hand wringing about the prospects (or lack of prospects) for revolution at that time and drawing the lesson that a revolution in Germany then could not have happened.

To buttress that argument the writings on the prospects of the 1923 revolution by August Thalheimer, a central theoretician and key adviser to German Communist Party leader Brandler in this period, have been warmly resurrected and particularly boosted. This kind of analysis, however, gets revolutionaries nowhere. It is one thing for those on the ground at the time in Germany and in the Comintern to miss the obvious signals for revolution it is another for later ‘revolutionaries’ to provide retrospective political cover for those who refused to see and act on the revolutionary opportunities at the time. The events surrounding the failed German revolution were also echoed in what was called the ‘literary debate’ inside the Russian Communist Party in 1924 at a time when the internal struggle, after the death of Lenin, was getting to a white heat. While at this historical distance it is probably impossible to argue all of the specifics of the revolutionary crisis of 1923 some lessons stick out.

A quick sketch of events beginning from the start of World War I with the famous treachery of the German Social Democratic leadership in voting for the Kaiser’s war budget (and continuing to vote for it) are in some ways decisive for what happened in 1923. Later, facing the consequences of the defeat of the German army, war exhaustion and the possibility of harsh reprisals from the Allied forces the Kaiser’s government was overthrown shortly after the armistice was signed and the fight was on in earnest for the future of Germany. That question as least temporarily, however, was not decided until the German working class had been subdued and or brought off with a bourgeois democratic republic, the notorious Weimar Republic. Unlike the earlier Russian experience in 1917 no independent mobilization of the working class through Soviets or other pan-working class organizations was fought for to the end. And that is the rub. This is the start of the problem. No Bolshevik-type organization was present to take advantage of the revolutionary situation. What is worst, the forces that did exist led by the heroic martyrs Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht were defeated and they personally were tragically and ominously murdered. Thus, a known and tested leadership was an essential missing ingredient that was to have consequences all the way through to 1923.

When a German Bolshevik-type organization finally was formed it contained many elements that were subjectively revolutionary but political naïve or disoriented, and suffered from anarchistic excesses in reaction to the stifling Social Democratic atmosphere of the pre-war period. While a party needs those subjectively elements to make the revolution, and this writer would argue that it cannot be made without them, this confusion gave the Social Democratic party plenty of ammunition for its reformist, parliamentary position. The key result of this lack of organization and proper preparededness was the so-called March Action of 1921. Unlike the overwhelming reaction of the German working class to the attempted Kopp Putsch of the previous year this was an action that went off half–cocked and did much to discredit communists in the eyes of the working class. The sorry results of this action had reverberations all the way up to the Communist International where Lenin and Trotsky were forced to defend the action in public, expel the former German party leader Paul Levi for a breech of discipline for his open criticism of the action (while it was going on) but also point out that it was the wrong way to go. In any case one cannot understand what happened (or did not happen) in 1923 without acknowledging the gun shyness of the Communist party leadership caused by the 1921 events.

So what is the specific argument of 1923 all about? Was there or was there not a realistic revolutionary opportunity to fight for a Soviet Germany which would have gone a long way to saving the Russian Revolution? On the face of it this question is a no-brainer. Of course there was a revolutionary situation. If the disruptions caused by the French take-over in the Ruhr in order to obtain their war reparations and the resultant passive resistance policy of the German government and the later inflationary spiral that affected many layers of German society was not a classic revolutionary situation then there are none this side of heaven. End of story.

The real question that underlines any argument against a revolutionary crisis is what to do (other than stick your head in the sand). This is where the previous “ultra" policies of the German Communist Party came into play. The party remained passive at a time when it was necessary for action. The leadership, including our above-mentioned friend Thalheimer, acted as if a revolutionary crisis would last for a prolonged period and that they had all the time in the world. They caught Zinoviev's disease (named for the Bolshevik leader who always seemed instinctively to go passive when it was necessary for action, and visa versa). Moreover, most critically they did not take advantage of the decline in the authority of the Social Democratic Party in order to win over the mass of the rank and file Soical Democrats that were leaving it in droves. That is where the preceding events described above come into play. The destruction of the authoritative leadership of Luxemburg and Liebknecht left a lesser layer of cadre not known for pursuing an aggressive strategy when called for. It is hard to believe that Luxemburg and Liebknecht would have responded in the same way as the Brandler/Thalheimer leadership. I would argue, if anything, Liebknecht would have had to be restrained a little. This is, in the final analysis, the decisive problem of the failure of the German Revolution in 1923. Nobody can predict whether a revolutionary crisis will lead to revolutionary success but one must certainly know when to move as the Bolsheviks did.

And what of the other reasons given for holding back. The fascists were a menace but hardly more than that. Damn, if they were really as much of a menace as right-wing social democrats and communists have portrayed the situation in 1923 what the hell were the fascists in say 1930, when they had 100,000 well-organized and fighting mad storm troopers in the streets. With that view the only rational policy for Communist would have been to make sure the German working class had its passports in order. As we tragically know there are never enough passports. And what of the German Army and outside capitalist military intervention? The army was not that big even though augmented by ‘unofficial’ paramilitary forces. It definitely would have been harder to split these forces along class lines. But workers militias would have at least been able to hold the line. And do not forget the more than willing Red Army was within a few days march to assist. As the Bolshevik Revolution and the ensuing Civil demonstrated in the final analysis a revolution is victorious or defeated despite the influence of whatever foreign forces are scheming against the regime.

And what about the internal capitalist opposition? And what about the stabilization of the economic situation? One can go on forever with the problems and talk oneself out of any action. While all these factors individually might argue against a revolutionary crisis in 1923 jointly they create the notion that this was a big revolutionary opportunity lost. That should make one suspicious, very suspicious, of the credentials of those ‘revolutionaries’ who argue that one did not exist. Read more on this subject.I know I will.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance!

Views From The Left-U.S. Hands Off Syria! Join And Build The Resistance! 

Frank Jackman comment; 

We can be all over the place on our opinions about what is happening in Syria-who to support-or not support- but one thing is crystal clear we must oppose any United States war escalations. Those of us in the United States have a special duty to oppose the main enemy of the peoples of the world.    



Here is another view from the left -

From The American Left History Archives (2008)- In Honor Of The Late Lynne Stewart (1939-2017)-Defend Lynne Stewart!

From The American Left History Archives (2008)- In Honor Of The Late Lynne Stewart (1939-2017)-Defend Lynne Stewart!





I think that I said it all back in 2006 and this can stand as a tribute to a courageous political woman and one hell of a lawyer, a people's lawyer-Frank Jackman (2017)


Ihave just added a link to the Lynne Stewart Defense Committee. Please read about this case at that site. Also note that here appeal is coming up for oral arguments before the Federal Appeals Court this week (January 28 2008). Below is a commentary I made at the time of her sentencing in October 2006 that I repost here.

COMMENTARY

WE NEED LAWYERS WHO ARE FUSS-
MAKERS NOT RAINMAKERS

FREE CO-DEFENDANTS YOUSRY AND SATTAR


Well, the Bush Administration has finally got New York Attorney Lynne Stewart (DESPITE HER DISBARMENT I WILL CONTINUE TO CALL HER ATTORNEY) where they want her. Ms. Stewart had previously been indicted on the vague and flimsy charge of "materially" aiding terrorism by essentially, on the record presented by the government at the trial, providing zealous advocacy for her client, Sheik Rahman, who had been convicted in various terrorist schemes including the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. At a trial in Federal District Court in New York City where the prosecution used every scare tactic in the post- 9/11 “War on Terror” playbook she was convicted. On October 16, 2006 she was finally sentenced on the charges. The federal judge in the case noting the severity of the crime but also the invaluable service that Ms. Stewart had rendered to the voiceless and downtrodden sentenced her to 28 months.

This sentence has been described as victory of sorts by Attorney Stewart and other commentators. The ever upbeat Ms. Stewart is quoted as stating that she, like some of her clients, could do that time “standing on her head”. Well, that may be, but the fact of the matter is that Attorney Stewart should not have been indicted, should not have been convicted and most definitely not sentenced for her actions on behalf of her client. Only the fact that the judge did not totally surrender to the government’s blatant appeals to “national security” issues and sentence her to the thirty years that they requested makes this any kind of “victory”. That joy over any lesser sentence could be considered as such is a telling reminder of the times we live in.

This case and the publicity surrounding it has dramatically warned any attorney who is committed to zealous defense of an unpopular or voiceless client to back off or face the consequences. The chilling effect on such advocacy, in some cases the only possible way to truly defend a client in this overheated reactionary atmosphere, is obvious. Moreover, the whole question of “material” aid to terrorism is a Pandora’s box for any political activist or even a merely interested non-political participant in any organization on the government’s “hit” list.

The government has the possibility of appealing the sentence to the Federal Court of Appeals so as of today October 18, 2006 the travails of Ms. Stewart are not over. Moreover, her conviction is still on appeal. From what I can gather in any reasonably quiet appeals court some of more blatant actions by the prosecution at trial would warrant, at minimum, a new trial if not the overturning of the conviction. Again, in these times such confidence may be unwarranted. I might add the “people’s lawyer” Lynne Stewart needs financial help to wage these new battles. Please consider sending a donation to the Lynne Stewart Defense Fund or to the organization I support- the Partisan Defense Committee- which will forward the donation. You can google either organization for addresses.

REVISED: NOVEMBER 2, 2006

ADDED NOTE: IN ANOTHER TELLING TALE OF THE TIMES THE INFORMATION THAT I RECEIVED FROM THE MASS MEDIA "NEGLECTED" TO INFORM THAT MS. STEWART'S ARAB TRANSLATOR , MOHAMED YOUSRY RECEIVED A 20 MONTH SENTENCE AND PARALEGAL ABDEL SATTAR RECEIVED 24 YEARS- NO THAT IS NOT A MISPRINT-24 YEARS. I MAKE UP OF THAT EGREGIOUS MISTAKE HERE. NEEDLESS TO SAY- FREE STEWART, YOUSRY AND SATTAR.

Shut Down Creech! Apr 23-29, 2017 - Stop the Drone Wars

 

Shut Down Creech! Apr 23-29, 2017

Mass mobilization to stop the Drone Warsshutdowncreech.blogspot.com
Join us April 23 – April 29, 2017 at Creech Air Force Base, Indian Springs, Nevada for a 3rd national mobilization of nonviolent resistance to shut down killer drone operations in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Pakistan,Yemen, Somalia and everywhere.  Includes weeklong Camp Justice peace encampment. Sponsored by: CODEPINK: Women For Peace, Nevada Desert Experience, Voices for Creative Nonviolence, Veterans For Peace & Courage to Resist
drones

Empire War Status

Op-ed by Bob Meola, Courage to Resist. April 3, 2017
A lot of people miss Barack Obama because he smiled nicely while he dropped over 26,000 bombs on seven nations, last year. He was a much more pleasant personality.…
Now, the McResistance, of the Democratic Party and the corporate media have their propagandists reviving the cold war and dangerously flirting with hot war with Russia. Americans are eating Russia Did It propaganda on a daily basis. It is the United States that has interfered with foreign elections and foreign governments everywhere and overthrown approximately five dozen of them since World War ll.… Read More

Support War Resister Pvt. Ryan Johnson

Imprisoned a decade after refusing crimes of his country

Please support US military war resister Army Private Ryan Johnson by making a tax-deductible donation to his support fund, hosted by Courage to Resist. Doing so will help Ryan through the remainder of his prison sentence, and help Ryan and his wife Jenna relocate after his release. Donate today:
https://couragetoresist.org/support-ryan
ryan and jennifer johnsonCourage to Resist. March 23, 2017
We at Courage to Resist are reaching out to you to help imprisoned Army soldier Ryan Johnson and his wife Jenna. We’re helping them get on their feet upon Ryan’s expected May release from Miramar Brig in Southern California. Your support is critical to help them begin their next chapter.
Ryan Johnson hasn’t gotten many easy breaks. He lost his father at the age of three. Growing up he would face years of abuse at the hands of a new stepfather. As a teen Ryan escaped into patterns of drug abuse, self-harm, and finally dropped out of high school. Now he endures insult of military imprisonment after literal injury serving the US armed forces. This pall of unfortunate circumstances doesn’t mean there isn’t light in Ryan’s life. He has persevered, with his compassion, kindness, and conscience intact.

When Humphrey Bogart Ruled The Crime Noir Night- "Dead Reckoning"




Dead Reckoning, starring Humphrey Bogart, Lizabeth Scott, 1947. 

Elsewhere in this space I have noted my love for film noir. The black and white photography, the story lines, the sparse and functional language. However, not all film noir is created equal and that is the case here. Humphrey Bogart was a classic match for the genre-tough, rugged, resolute, loyal and always loyal to a pal come what may. Such roles as Philip Marlowe in The Big Sleep or Sam Spade in The Maltese Falcon come to mind. Here he tries to milk that work without being a detective but with the same qualities as he tries to defend the honor of a fallen and maligned fellow soldier. Add Lizabeth Scott as the femme fatale who jams up the works and you would seemingly have the makings of a fine film. When the plot holds interest to a point there is a very strong sense of déjà vu from previous work. If you want to see the film noir master at work then see Bogie in The Big Sleep or The Maltese Falcon. Save this one for back up.

The Mayfair Swells Without The Music-Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant And Jimmy Stewart’s “The Philadelphia Story” (1939)-A Film Review

The Mayfair Swells Without The Music-Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant And Jimmy Stewart’s “The Philadelphia Story” (1940)-A Film Review 




DVD Review

By Associate Film Critic Alden Riley

The Philadelphia Story, starring Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, Jimmy Stewart, directed by George Cukor, 1940


[A while back my “boss” in this space Sandy Salmon the long time film critic for the American Film Gazette who took over the chores here from the retiring Sam Lowell did a review of Howard Hughes’ production of the film adaptation of the successful Ben Hecht and Charles MacArthur play The Front Page where he ruminated that he thought that he had already reviewed the film since the story line seemed very familiar. Sandy thought he was having a senior moment, thought maybe he had seen one too many films and had scratched his head over the plotline and message behind too many such efforts as well. As it turned out he had merely “confused” himself with the fact that he had previously reviewed His Girl Friday starring Cary Grant and Rosalind Russell which was just the distaff perspective, Sandy’s word, of the same story, in other words a woman is the ace reporter who can’t give up the newspaper rat race when a big story hit her right in the face despite her avowal she was going for the white picket fence, dog, three point two children and a nine to five guy to bring home the bacon.

The same thing, that deja vu thing has happened to me recently, and I am far younger and less fragile than Sandy, when I reviewed a 1950s musical extravaganza called High Society starring vivacious Grace Kelly in her last role before becoming a fairy queen, princess, you know royalty, Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby. Somebody, maybe Sandy, had shortly thereafter suggested that I check out the film to be reviewed below which except for the music is very much the same freaking story. Let me tell you this and be done with it this is the last time I will be reviewing this story line although somebody, not Sandy, says there is yet another version of this same sappy, soapy story line if I want to disturb my sleep futher than it already had been to no good purpose. Enough. Alden Riley] 

******
The Mayfair swells whether in plush Main Line Philadelphia (of which the very underrated novelist from nowhere Pottsville, Pennsylvania made a literary career out of detailing starting with Appointment At Samarra if you really want to get the load down on their work habits and sexual inclinations) or high end summer watering holes like Newport which a guy like Henry James would have had a field day “celebrating” if he hadn’t gone Anglo-exile, certainly have their problems. Whether or not they have musical abilities or not. Can croon to make the angels blush for their inadequacies or not. And no matter what time frame from the edge of the Great Depression which they, at least the survivors of 1929 had heard about in passing or in the dead of the red scare Cold War night as one film critic has described the 1950s. When I first saw this film I said to myself in some disbelief that I had already seen the film, or at least knew the story-line because I had just reviewed a Technicolor production of High Society with Grace Kelly (before she went off to be the real queen of Sheba or some kind of royalty in some fake kingdom by the sea), crooner Frank Sinatra (last reviewed in this space as a psycho hired assassin in Suddenly, no that is not right it was his well-deserved Oscar-winning performance in the film adaptation of James Jones’ From Here To Eternity) and crooner Bing Crosby (last seen probably in an un-reviewed Going My Way ) getting into mischief down in sunny Newport during the Jazz Festival.

That mischief, as here, involved the nefarious, yes, nefarious schemes of one Dexter Haven a high-end Mayfair swell tunesmith (figures for crooner Crosby) to get his ex-wife comely high-spirited and high-minded Tracy Lord (played by Princess Grace before she was Princess Grace) back in the fold. Problem: a big problem was that Ms. Tracy was getting ready to democratically marry a non-Mayfair swell the very next weekend. Here Dexter, played by cavalier Cary Grant, is nothing but a scheming high-end nautical architect slumming in the leafy suburbs of Main Line Philadelphia (you know among the Quaker-influenced old line gentry). Old Tracy, played by handsome and bright Katharine Hepburn, though is hard to get what with those high-spirited and high-mined ways that either version of the Mayfair swell assertive young Tracy held in hand. So the chase was on to see if old Dexter, or somebody could make Tracy see reason and dump this snobbish upstart who is looking to go up the social food chain by this timely marriage.                      

Enter Spy magazine in the person of frustrated writer Mike, played by Jimmy Stewart, who is hack writing for this scandal rag to keep the wolves from his door. In fact to have a door to keep them at bay with otherwise tossed out on the mean streets. This tainted high society marriage idea is meat for that publication. Mike, a hard-boiled, realistic, witty, sardonic guy is smitten, seriously smitten, by the upscale Tracy. Now the chase really was on. The three suitors spent the rest of the film jockeying for Tracy’s affections. Naturally the upstart guy she is supposed to marriage will be left at the altar and was a non-starter. Mike almost made the whole distance when Tracy had an epiphany after a drunken pre-nuptial reverie and was ready to go down and dirty to push Mike onto that serious writer’s career he longed for. But in the end, in the almost inevitable end among the Mayfair swells old-line class and breeding won out as Dexter’s anaconda strategy paid off.


Like I said I have already covered this plot-line. Enough. No mas. Even if it is a great story well- acted.        

On the 100th Anniversary Of The Russian Revolution-A SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC VIEW OF LEON TROTSKY

On the 100th Anniversary Of The Russian Revolution-A SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC VIEW OF LEON TROTSKY  




BOOK REVIEW

LEON TROTSKY, IRVING HOWE, HOLT,RHINEHART, New York, 1978


As readers of this space may know I make no bones about being an admirer of the work of Leon Trotsky (see archives). I also believe that the definitive biography of the man is Isaac Deutchers’ s three-volume set. Nevertheless, others have written biographies on Trotsky that are either less balanced than Deutscher’s or come at it from a different angle with a different ax to grind. Irving Howe’s, self-defined quasi-biography is a standard social-democratic take on Trotsky’s life and work.

The late Mr. Howe, long time editor of the political journal "Dissent" and a political 'godfather' of today's neo-conservatives, takes on the huge task of attempting to whittle down one of the big figures of 20th century history against the backdrop of that mushy social-democratic ‘State Department’ socialism that the left New York intelligentsia gravitated to in the 1950’s and early 1960’s. That standard response invokes admiration for the personality and intellectual achievements of Trotsky the man while abhorring his politics, especially those pursued as a high Soviet official when he was in political power. In the process Mr. Howe demonstrates as much about his weak ‘socialist libertarian’ politics grounded in a theory of Soviet ‘bureaucratic collectivism’ than a serious examination into Trotsky’s politics. There are some chasms that cannot be breached and this is one of them.

In classic fashion Howe sets up Trotsky’s virtues early. Thus he recognizes and appreciates the early romantic revolutionary and free-lance journalist in the true Russian tradition who faced jail and exile without flinching; the brilliant, if flawed, Marxist theoretician who defied all-comers at debate and whose theory of permanent revolution set the standard for defining the strategic pace of the Russian revolution; the great organizer of the revolutionary fight for power in 1917 and later organizer of the Red Army victory in the Civil War; the premier Communist literary critic of his age; the ‘premature’ anti-Stalinist who fought against the degeneration of the revolution; the lonely exile rolling the rock up the mountain despite personal tragedy and political isolation. However, my friends, Howe’s biographical sketches are about an intensely political man by one who was a political opponent of everything that Trotsky stood for. Thus, all the patently obvious and necessary recognition of Trotsky as one of the great figures of the first half of the 20th century is a screen for taking Trotsky off of Olympus.

And here again Howe uses all the points there are in the social democratic standard catechism. The flawed nature of Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution as applied to Russia in 1917 and also to later semi-colonial and colonial countries; the undemocratic nature of the Bolshevik seizure of power in regard to other socialist parties; the horrors of the Civil War which helped lead to the degeneration of the revolution; Trotsky’s recognized tendency as a Soviet official to be attracted to administrative solutions; his adamant defense of the heroic days of the Bolshevik party and the Soviet Union, even in its degenerated state, against all comers until the end of his life; his weakness as a party political organizer in the fierce intra-party factional struggles and later, in attempting to found new communist parties and a new international; and, the inevitable ‘crime of crimes’ for the social democratic set- his failure to politically bloc with the Bukharinite Right Opposition after its defeat by Stalin.

Of course the kindest interpretation one can make for Howe’s polemic is that he believes like many another erstwhile biographer that Trotsky should have given up the political struggle and become- what? Another bourgeois academic or better yet an editor of Partisan Review, Dissent or Commentary? Obviously Mr. Howe did not pay sufficient attention to the parts that he considered Trotsky’s virtues. The parts about the intrepid revolutionary with a great sense of history and his role in it. And the wherewithal to find a place in it. Does that seem like the Trotsky that Howe wrote about? No. A fairer way to put it is this. Trotsky probably represented the highest expression of what it was like to be a communist man, warts and all, in the sea of a non-Communist world. And that is high historical praise indeed.

In Boston- Tax Day Rally (4/15) Announces Speakers & Performers!

Tax Day Rally Saturday, April 15, 1:00 pm
Cambridge Common

Trump must release all his tax returns

Corporations and 1%ers should pay their fair share in taxes

Oppose the Trump/Ryan “Death Budget”

Support the People’s Budget

[image: Sign Up]
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=Sg1K8E6d7%2F073Nra5fTYUmiGl3WB6Ui4>
*Info*: bit.ly/tax-day-info
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ZmOf9c88SkNPbDlMLl6CGKg2kxKCZSLz>

*Sign up/ Volunteer*: bit.ly/tax-day-signup
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=fhwFkIU7M748yhEZoqS4oag2kxKCZSLz>

*If ever patriots were needed to address threats to the country, that time
is now.*

*Below we announce the speakers and performers who will highlight our Tax
Day Rally on Cambridge Common, Saturday, April 15!*

Trump’s lies, corruption and his new budget proposal pose a clear and
present danger to the nation

- *We Demand** that Donald Trump release his tax returns! *Expose
Trump’s conflicts of interests and business connections. As a billionaire,
he will directly benefit from his proposed tax breaks.

- *We Demand** that big corporations and people with very high incomes
pay their fair share of taxes. *Oppose the hundreds of billions of
dollars in even more “big, big” tax giveaways promised by the president.

Confirmed Speakers

Barbara Madeloni, President, Massachusetts Teachers Association

Cassandra Bensahih, EPOCA/ Jobs Not Jails

representative, New England Independence Campaign

Molly Hannon, Massachusetts Alliance of HUD Tenants

Dan Fishman, political director, Libertarian Party of Mass.

Emily Kirkland, 350 Massachusetts

Rev. Vernon Walker, Pine Street Inn

Josh Hoxie, Institute of Policy Studies
Performers

Vocal Opposition
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=vo3BsusNIt%2Bs4H09tc9SlKg2kxKCZSLz>
(protest
chorus)

Loyal Opposition (patriotic Dixieland tunes)

Maurice Taylor
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=IsLZxhb3aAfTkgEecGPca6g2kxKCZSLz>
(spoken
word)

- *Oppose** Trump’s “Death Budget”*
- Stand up for our families: the president’s budget poses a mortal
threat to affordable housing, job training, senior programs, education,
public transportation, job safety, rural development programs
and services
of all kinds, and emergency food, housing and heating support.
- [image: Sign Up]
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=wdD%2BgP76ckLeaolCWZbc8Kg2kxKCZSLz>Oppose
the all-out attack on our climate, environment, and health that
lie at the
center of Trump’s budget proposal.
- Redirect Pentagon spending to meet our human needs. Instead of
increasing military spending by $54 billion a year—fueling wars,
lining the
pockets of the military-industrial-congressional complex, and
building “The
Wall”, fund critical domestic programs and our states and towns
- Support the *People’s Budget* as a positive alternative

*
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=kyxdhWOP0g5RpVEdZMKEEqg2kxKCZSLz>**
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=vv38UDWRZEtXArcnMoL5n2iGl3WB6Ui4>**Sign
Up to Attend and/or Volunteer!
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=mlqQCkxxCAdLMBjnZIg3j6g2kxKCZSLz>*
* Join us for a great gathering of patriots on Cambridge Common on April
15, the site where George Washington first took command of the army of the
Continental Congress to fight for our independence from empire and tyranny.*

*Note:* The Tax Day Rally was previously announced as taking place on
Boston Common and at Moakley Park. These have been changed! The correct
location is Cambridge Common. We apologize for the confusion.

*Donate!
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=pMEAPUJ2seIU4JhfPiqJ%2FKg2kxKCZSLz>**
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=ERpW1v9ErgzQWxOrHhIyv6g2kxKCZSLz>*
We need your help so we can make Tax Day Rally as big as possible!

*Sponsors:* Budget for All Campaign info@budget4allmass.org • Massachusetts
Alliance of HUD Tenants michaelkane@saveourhomes.org • Massachusetts Peace
Action info@masspeaceaction.org • American Friends Service Committee
pshannon@afsc.org • New England Independence Campaign • 617-354-2169
<(617)%20354-2169>
[image: Cole Harrison]

For a People's Revolution

Cole Harrison
Executive Director

P.S. Don't forget to sign up to attend or volunteer at the Tax Day Rally!
<http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=uQ1%2Fwd1bHuI3ns3EtHZDI6g2kxKCZSLz>

--
Cole Harrison
Executive Director
Massachusetts Peace Action
11 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
w: 617-354-2169
m: 617-466-9274
f: /masspeaceaction
t: @masspeaceaction
_______________________________________________
Act-MA mailing list
Act-MA@act-ma.org
http://act-ma.org/mailman/listinfo/act-ma_act-ma.org
To set options or unsubscribe
http://act-ma.org/mailman/options/act-ma_act-ma.org