From The American Left History Blog Archives (2007-08)- On American Political
Discourse
Markin comment:
In 2007-2008 I, in vain,
attempted to put some energy into analyzing the blossoming American presidential
campaign since it was to be, as advertised at least, a watershed election, for
women, blacks, old white anglos, latinos, youth, etc. In the event I had to abandon
the efforts in about May of 2008 when it became obvious, in my face obvious,
that the election would be a watershed only for those who really believed that
it would be a watershed election. The four years of the Obama presidency, the
2012 American presidential election campaign, and world politics have only
confirmed in my eyes that that abandonment was essentially the right decision
at the right time. In short, let the well- paid bourgeois commentators go on and
on with their twitter. I, we, had (have) better things to do like fighting against
the permanent wars, the permanent war economies, the struggle for more and better
jobs, and for a workers party that fights for a workers government . More than
enough to do, right? Still a look back at some of the stuff I wrote then does not
a bad feel to it. Read on if you like
*********
Adieu, Karl Rove- Almost
There appears to be something
of a law that right wing political ideologues, venal as many of them are, do
not retire but merely move on to greener pastures. At least that appears to be
the case of one Karl Rove who until this past September served as President
George W. Bush’s ‘brain’. No sooner had we seen him off to the rolling hills of
East Texas the he pops up on the “Charlie Rose Show”. His purpose? To muddy the
waters about who, and who did not act, impulsively in the lead up to the
ill-fated Iraq War. Rove is retailing the notion that the legislative branch,
in this case, the august ‘slumbering giant’ United States Senate ‘bushwhacked’
the Administration into a rush to judgment. Okay, Karl have it your way. That,
however, is not the real point here. The nefarious Mr. Rove is getting a jump
start on history by influencing what the first drafts will look like. Oh, well.
But mark this, some ‘objective’ historian writing about the Iraq War and the
slow demise of the American Empire in fifty or one hundred years will, in order
to give all sides their due, cite Mr. Rove’s remarks as the coin of the realm.
Nice touch, Karl. But know this also,
there is no truth to be found there. Nevertheless, as I noted in the commentary
below written as a ‘tearful’ farewell to a departed foe in September here is a savage
class warrior.
COMMENTARY
A SAVAGE CLASS WARRIOR LEAVES
BUSH TO HIS OWN DEVICES
Well by now everyone among the
‘chattering classes’ knows that Republican President George Bush’s ‘evil
counselor’, one Karl Rove, has like so many in the recent past abandoned the
sinking ship U.S.S. Bush and gone off to seek greener pastures in the hills of
Texas. However, unlike most of the Bush ilk, the likes of Donald Rumsfeld and
Paul Wolfowitz to a name a couple, I will miss Karl Rove as a target. Why? I
will make a confession based on a very long experience in politics- I get along
better with and better understand right wing ideologues than the usual mushy
‘consultant’ types who populate today’s political scene. The ‘band- aid guys’
and the ‘scotch- tape gals’ whose political program is a small grab bag of
‘nice’ things to tweak the capitalist system while leaving it intact and that
solve nothing leave me cold. One only needs to mention the name of the
apparently recently retired Democratic Party consultant and perennially ‘loser’
Robert Schrum to bring this point home.
Give me the hard ball
players, the real bourgeois class warriors, any day. They know there is a class
struggle going on as well as I do and know that, in the final analysis, it is a
fight to the finish. And who will dare say that Karl Rove was not the hell-bent
king of that crowd. Anyone who could get a genuine dolt like George Bush
elected twice Governor of Texas and twice President of the United States
without flinching knows his business. Imagine if Rove had had a real political
street fighter like Richard Nixon for a client. Yes, I know in the end Mr. Rove
and I will be shooting from different sides of the barricades but Karl was a
real evil genius and I will miss that big target.
Karl Rove honed two basic
propositions that Marxists can appreciate, even if only from an adversarial
position. One was the above-mentioned sense of the vagaries of the class
struggle for the bourgeois class that he so faithfully represented. How he was
able to grab the dirt poor and against the wall farmers of places like Kansas
and the desperately poor of the small towns of the ‘Rust Belt’ as cannon fodder
voters for a party that has not represented plebeian interests since at least
the 1870’s is worthy of study. The second was his notion,
parliamentary-centered to be sure, of a ‘vanguard’ party. What? Karl Rove as some kind of closet
Leninist? No. However, his proposition that the Republican party should cater
to its social conservative base and drag whoever it could in their wake is a
piece of political wisdom that leftists should think through more. Much better
that approach than to rely on the
current dominant ‘popular front’ strategy of organizing on the basis of the
lowest common- denominator issues whittled down to a meaningless point just to
avoid antagonizing the Democrats instead of fighting for what is necessary.
Yes, one can learn something from one’s political adversaries- Adieu, Karl.
No comments:
Post a Comment