Markin comment:
In 2007-2008 I, in vain,
attempted to put some energy into analyzing the blossoming American
presidential campaign since it was to be, as advertised at least, a watershed
election, for women, blacks, old white anglos, latinos, youth, etc. In the
event I had to abandon the efforts in about May of 2008 when it became obvious,
in my face obvious, that the election would be a watershed only for those who really
believed that it would be a watershed election. The four years of the Obama
presidency, the 2012 American presidential election campaign, and world
politics have only confirmed in my eyes that that abandonment was essentially
the right decision at the right time. In short, let the well- paid bourgeois
commentators go on and on with their twitter. I, we, had (have) better things
to do like fighting against the permanent wars, the permanent war economies,
the struggle for more and better jobs, and for a workers party that fights for
a workers government . More than enough to do, right? Still a look back at some
of the stuff I wrote then does not a bad feel to it. Read on.
************
FOR A MORATORIUM ON HOME FORECLOSURES
COMMENTARY
NEW HOMEOWNERS NEED SOME RELIEF NOW
There has bee a recent spike in home foreclosures,
particularly in New England , due to several
factors, including predatory borrowing practices by banks and other lending
institutions and housing price declines as a result of oversupply. A call for a foreclosure moratorium would,
however, seem unlikely as a cause for action and comment by a left-wing
propagandist. Traditionally the left-wing position on home ownership was, as
spelled out by Frederich Engels, Karl Marx’s close collaborator, don’t do it.
The rationale behind that position, not an unreasonable political one, was that
the struggle to make house payments in an uncertain capitalist economic environment
sapped the political energies of the working class and therefore tended to make
workers and their families more conservative. A later practical example of this
was cited by American Socialist Workers Party leader James P. Cannon in the
early 1950’s during a faction fight involving a significant section of its
trade union cadre when he noted that their revolutionary edge had been blunted
by concerns over keeping their homes. From another political perspective, also
from the 1950’s, Robert Levitt the capitalist
developer and builder of the hugely successful suburban tract houses of the
period known as Levittowns noted that no one who owned his own home was likely
to become a communist. Those points are all well and good but, as the Russian
Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin pointed out, the task of socialists is to act
as ‘tribunes of the people’. And damn, on this one it is the ‘people’ who are
being squeezed out.
One of the great enduring myths of American capitalist
society is that with a little bit of effort every person can own their own
home. Moreover, that condition is one of the prerequisites for having ‘made it’
in America .
The long and short of it is that many layers of society have in the past, are
now, and will probably in the future desire to have their own homes. Using this
notion as a wedge banking institutions has created a huge number of ways to
‘own’ a home as long a one was willing, knowingly or not, to pay extra for this
privilege. Gone are the days when a family saved for a certain time to make a
reasonable down payment and bought a house based on reasonable expectations of
being able to pay off the mortgage, or upgrade, etc. So be it. Although I have
not been privy to all the data concerning who is being foreclosed on, I have
observed where the foreclosure auctions are taking place and it is not in the
wealthy neighborhoods and towns in my area. The net seems to be dragging those
first-time minority and working class buyers who with just the slightest
downward shift in economic conditions are pushed to the wall. That, dear
reader, is why this is an issue for socialists. While we definitely have our
own ideas about how housing will be distributed under socialism-and it will not
look like today’s absurdly inequitable distribution- these people need relief
now. Is this a revolutionary demand? Hell, no. Is it a just demand? Hell, yes. STOP
THE FORECLOSURES.
No comments:
Post a Comment