The Golden Age Of The
B-Film Noir- Barbara Payton’s “Bad Blonde” (1953)
DVD Review
By Film Critic Emeritus
Sam Lowell
Bad Blonde (released in
England unbelievably as The Flanagan Boy),
starring tragedy-filled blonde bombshell Barbara Payton, Tony Wright, Belinda
Lee, Hammer Productions, 1953
I am done, finished,
ended, kaput, vaya con dios, adios, out of here or whatever expression you like
to indicate that before I blow my top I will go no further with this series of
B-noirs (noirs not to die for unlike the lead-ins expression on each DVD
intro). Part, the lesser part now, of that reason is based on getting tired,
very tired, of the razing I have been receiving from my fellows here on this
site after an irate reader called me out as essentially a “penny a word”
buffoon “padding” my reviews with extra stuff that she believed didn’t need to
be included in order to get the gist of what each film was about. The greater
reason now is rather more simple one of B-noir exhaustion after struggling
through trying to find any reason for watching the latest film in the series Bad Blonde which had many ways to go,
had many possibilities to reach high B-noir almost A-level but sank into its
own funk and never rose from the mud again.
To give one very germane
example of what I should have expected since I have already reviewed a half
dozen or so in the series is that in England the film was released under the
totally boorish title The Flanagan Boy
making me think of the old-time Boys’ Town out in Nebraska I think run by
Father Flanagan from which every Christmas I would get some kind of Christmas
stamps was supposed to send dough for the wayward boys as a result. Being wise
to the world a little even then I never sent nothing since I had nothing to
send although that did not stop me from using the stamps as cheap Christmas
wrapping for presents. Yeah, times were that hard for us, for my family back
then. But this Flanagan is nothing but an up and coming prize fighter, you know
a boxer who spends his eye time eying like any good-looking young guy blondes,
good or bad, or any other color around should. To name the film after him when
this bad blonde dish comes hither and yon his way seemed like such a travesty
along with the dialogue that I, like a used up prize fighter threw in the
towel, or will after this excursion is over.
Here’s the beauty of a
last review though. I don’t have to give, as we used to say in the old
neighborhood, a rat’s ass about that irate reader who tagged me with that
“penny a word” designation that will probably hang around my neck until they
put me under the ground if my dear colleagues, led by Sandy Salmon, Alden
Riley, and Pete Markin have anything to say about it. So I will “pad” this baby
with whatever comes into my head.
This is what I started
with in my last review as a lead in for this dog’s tail, a review of has-been
(hell he did three of these Hammer films not to his subsequent film career
advantage I don’t believe) Dane Clark’s Blackout
(released in England under the quizzical title Murder by Proxy so this latest title travesty was hardly the
first):
“Wouldn’t you want a
long-time film reviewer like me, or my colleagues in this space who are the
regular reviewers, Sandy Salmon and Alden Riley, to draw a map for you, let you
know what is what about any particular film in relationship to others in the
genre. As the headline to this review notes (and has on other occasions in this
ten film series) I am reviewing a series of B-film noirs from the 1950s
produced by the Robert Lippert Hollywood-based organization in conjunction with
Hammer Productions in England. The idea, at least this is what I have been able
to gather from various readings and speculations after now having reviewed scads
of these efforts, by Lippert was to grab some faded Hollywood star who either
needed the dough or was looking for some film, any film, to satisfy whatever
stardust lust drove him or her to the studio lots in the first place and back
him or her up with an English cast, do the production in England and get away
with costs on the cheap. If you knew that and then somebody, me, came along and
told you that these efforts didn’t compare, didn’t compare at all with classic
noirs, you know Out Of The Past, The Big
Sleep, The Maltese Falcon, The Last Man Standing and others that you almost
know all the lines from by heart since you have seen the films so many times,
wouldn’t you appreciate that knowledge
“You would think so but you
would at least in one case, actually more, but the reader I am thinking of as I
write this has become something of a thorn in my side, my efforts to draw
comparisons have given me nothing but grief, and had hung on me the title of
“penny a word” writer as a joke by my colleagues.
“I noted in my last
review in this series, The House Across
The Lake, another has-been title that in my long career in the film
reviewing racket, a profession if you will which is overall pretty subjective
when you think about it, I have run up against all kind of readerships and
readers but my recent escapade with one reader takes the cake as they used to
say in the old days. That is the person I am thinking of right now as I write
yet another screed against the injustice done to me by that person. To cut to
the chase a B-grade film noir is one that is rather thin on plotline and maybe
film quality usually made on the cheap although some of the classics with
B-film noir queen Gloria Grahame have withstood the test of time despite that
quality. I have contrasted those with the classics like The Maltese Falcon, Out Of The Past, The Big Sleep, and The Last Man Standing to give the
knowledgeable reader an idea of the different.
“I have as already noted
done a bunch of these (excluding a couple which I refused to review since they
were so thin I couldn’t justify the time and effort to even give the “skinny”
on them) using a kind of standard format discussing the difference between the
classics and Bs in some detail and then as has been my wont throughout my
career giving a short summary of the film’s storyline and maybe a couple of
off-hand comments so that the readership has something to hang its hat on when
choosing to see, or not see, the film. All well and good until about my fifth review
when a reader wrote in complaining about my use of that standard form to
introduce each film. Moreover and this is the heart of the issue she mentioned
that perhaps I was getting paid per word, a “penny a word” in her own words and
so was padding my reviews with plenty that didn’t directly relate to the
specific film I was reviewing.
“Of course other than to
cut me to the quick “penny a word” went out with the dime store novel and I had
a chuckle over that expression since I have had various types of contracts for
work over the years but not that one since nobody does that anymore. The long
and short of it was that the next review was a stripped down version of the
previous reviews which I assumed would satisfy her complaint. Not so. Using the
name Nora Charles, the well-known distaff side of the Dashiell Hammett-inspired
film series The Thin Man from the
1930s and early 1940s starring William Powell and Myrna Loy, she still taunted
me with that odious expression of hers. (I also mentioned there as an aside
that one of the pitfalls of citizen journalism, citizen commentary on-line is
that one can use whatever moniker one wants to say the most unsavory things and
not flame any blow-back). Now Sandy, Alden, Pete Markin, the administrator of
this space and a few others have started to call me that as well-‘hey, penny a
word.” That has made my blood boil on more than one occasion but I have calmly
put up with it rather than blow-up and threaten murder and mayhem to them-and
to Nora…..”
As I pointed out in that
review enough of this or Nora will really have case about me “padding” my
reviews. Here is the “skinny” on the film under review Bad Blonde in any case as is my wont and let dear sweet Nora suffer
through another review-if she dares. A lot could have been done with this
plotline, no question, and no matter dear Nora now that I have flamed out I
will explain a little by comparison why this damn film is a B and not a
classic. Hey this one has the eternal dilemma at its heart. A young, bored, beautiful,
1950s standard beautiful blonde, which meant very blonde and very well aware of
that hard fact to the sorrows of all the brunettes, red-heads and raven-haired
beauties who took back benches to goddess blonde starting with Marilyn and
working down to the bad blonde in this one, Barbara Payton, playing Lorna, the
unhappy young trophy wife, of an older man, a wealthy man who seemingly made
his dough in some kind of rackets, but who nevertheless seems to believe that
everybody in the world was his friend. And maybe they were-except that young,
bored, very blonde wife who nevertheless knew that she had tagged into the next
best thing-grabbing a fistful of gold in her cheapjack tank dancer life. She
was not about to give up the gravy train but she was also fed up with the old
man’s pawing and grabbing. And she was savvy enough once her change came to
have that action stop-stopped cold.
Enter as if manna from
heaven a young prize-fighter, a young handsome Johnny, played rather woodenly
and distractedly by Tony Wright, with plenty of muscle and a fatal attraction to
everything that wore a skirt. Enter her life through his manager’s connection with
her husband whom he knew previously and who could provide the backing necessary
to get this Johnny boy, this, huh, Flanagan boy to the top of the fight racket.
Once the husband sees handsome bulging Johnny, but more importantly once Lorna
see him in action in the ring, her lips pursed, teeth bared, sexually aroused
by the sight of him she gets her act into high gear. That husband is headed for
an early grave and that is that. Of course Lorna played her Johnny like a yo-yo
ignoring him at first and making little of his manhood and then letting him steam
up. Easy work. So easy that when she springs the deal, the real deal, although he
isn’t bright enough to see her devilish play, he is all ears. Figures that he
will sweep her and the dough up. Needless to say while the murder was rather
tiresome, supposedly by drowning hubby, drowning him good and dead Johnny was
put on the spot, would be the fall guy, would face the big step-off for his
misdeeds.
That is all in a day’s
work as far as this film goes. A hard day’s work since while Lorna (Barbara
Payton) played her role pretty well as the, well, bad blonde, this muscle-bound
Johnny, this Tony Wright is an airhead. Now for comparisons. Look the theme of
the bored younger wife, although not always a blonde, trying to get rid of an
older husband for dough, for another man, hell, just to have him stop mauling
her no matter what the money situation is as old as Adam and Eve, maybe older.
In film think about Lana Turner leading John Garfield right up to the big
step-off after putting her old curmudgeon cheapie diner chef husband to the big
sleep and he still smiling at the thought of her right before the lord high
executioner is ready to do his work in The
Postman Always Rings Twice. Think
about Fred MacMurry once he sees that ankle bracelet walking down the stairs and
even before he sees Barbara Standwycks’ face he is a goner-and so is her older
cheapskate engineer stay-at home husband in Double
Indemnity. Think, oh forget it, those classics should not even be mentioned
in the same paragraph as they interplay between Johnny and Lorna here. Do you
see now why I no longer give a rat’s ass about this Hammer Production material.
Unlike a few other films
in this series this film never took turns like a real thriller but the lifeless
dialogue and the wooden acting by the Brits (and by faded Barbara in spots too
too) made this thing a holy goof. As I have mentioned before in other reviews
where things actually looked promising at the beginning here despite the come
hither title (in America anyway) and the titillating advertisement poster (see
above) for the film this one faded away on its own dead weight. B-noir but
seriously B not heading to classics-no way. I am done.
No comments:
Post a Comment