Traipsing Through The Arts-All Serious 20th
Century Art Is About Sex-Forget That Stuff You Learned In Art Class About The
Search For The Sublime-When The Desert Flower Bloomed-“Georgia O’Keeffe”
By Laura Perkins
Sometimes some things fall in your lap like manna from
heaven. I had (or should I now say we have since my “ghost” advisor in what he
calls the shadows Sam Lowell helps with the work) expected to present a piece
on colorist Grady Lamont and his in your face explicitly self-proclaimed sexual
nature of his art works. Then Sam’s old-time growing up in the working-class
Acre section North Adamsville Si Lannon took up site manager Greg Green’s
assignment reviewing a film about modernist painter Georgia O’Keeffe, her art
and her stormy relationship with modern art promoter Alfred Stieglitz. (See archives, May 20, 2019.) Of course, I
almost flipped out when I heard of Si’s assignment from Sam. Naturally that
review of that particular artist dovetailed very nicely with my (our) theory
that all serious 20th modern art is driven by sex and sensuality,
what I call erotic undertones. That is the manna from heaven part since, in
passing, Si acknowledged without reference to our theory unknown to him at the
time the sexual nature of much of her work, especially her florid flower work.
The other part, the we have to do some work in this on-going
series even with the manna from heaven, relates to Si’s mentioning in his
introduction his up and down history with art and works of art. Si, Sam and I
had a talk before we decided to use Si’s review as the main vehicle for putting
O’Keeffe’s under the sign of our theory. We decided further to use Si’s
youthful experiences and his “conversion” (like the Christian Saint Paul after
seeing Christ do his thing) as a springboard to our own takes on O’Keeffe.
For what Si first experienced in the art world you can read
his introduction below, but we would be remiss if we didn’t trace his
conversion and its relationship to modern art. Naturally Si presents a funny,
now funny, story about his first trip to a museum, the MFA in Boston which made
him hate even the very word art. But that is not the whole story so I will fill
you in. Si mentioned that his hatred, like many things, centered on a real
person, his art teacher as it turned out for his junior and high school years
Mr. Jones-Henry. Here is the back story. In the seventh grade Si actually had
something like a positive attitude toward art, has a fairly good grade that
year especially after doing a huge Paper Mache project involving creating a
dinosaur kingdom which was exhibited in the showcase in front of the office at
Snug Harbor Junior High where he went to school in North Adamsville.
You already know, or will know, what turned Si against art,
against Mr. Jones-Henry. Si, in the summer between the eighth and ninth grade,
moved with his family to the Acre section of North Adamsville. Strangely, that
move represented a step up for his family since they had lived in the
Adamsville Housing Authority, “the projects” into a small, very small single-family
house when the family income grew beyond what the city’s means test allowed to
stay in the projects. That summer, and this is important, is when Si and Sam
met since Sam lived the next street over from where Si’s family had moved.
The importance of that friendship was not immediately
obvious since Si had never expected that he would have to face Mr. Jones-Henry
again after the eighth-grade MFA disaster or really his striking out in the
teenage love game which I firmly believe he should have expected if not then,
then later since we all have wounds, desired or not, without taking it out on
art, or art teachers. In any case he did. He freaked out the first day of
school when he saw Mr. Jones-Henry in the corridor across from his homeroom. He
asked his homeroom teacher how Mr. Jones-Henry came to be an art teacher at the
high school. It had something to do with a Miss Lewis retiring in the summer
unexpectedly due to poor health and Mr. Jones-Henry having some seniority to
bid on the job and his resume was far and above any other candidate.
Since the high school had a few art teachers Si figured he
would not wind up with his nemesis. Wrong, totally wrong. When he got his class
schedule the next day (the first day of school was a half day fluff day then so
he didn’t know that day) he, and Sam as well, wound up in Mr. Jones-Henry’s
class. He tried to get out of the class but that would have been impossible in
those days when the classes were tracked by ability not a mix. Worse of all was
the policy then of keeping the classes with the same art teacher for four years
to benefit from continuity (which would have mixed results and is now frowned
upon educationally from what I hear from my grandchildren). Nothing good could
come out of that. Except his friendship with Sam, and almost from day one of
high school Si’s entry into the world of Sam and his corner boys from junior
high led by Frankie Riley with the “house intellectual” the late Pete Markin as
his flak-catcher.
This is a good point to mention what Sam has already
mentioned in the piece that we let him do giving his take on the art I have
selected to buttress our sex and sensuality theory. Sam loved art, loved to
draw and paint from an early age and being assigned to Mr. Jones-Henry’s class
was his personal manna from heaven since by junior year he was essentially the
“assistant” art teacher. In the end Mr. Jones-Henry would help Sam get into his
alma mater Massachusetts School of Art on a necessary scholarship he was so
determined to get for Sam. That Sam decided, or his mother decided, that was
not the best road forward for him and his future didn’t take his longtime love
of art away. In the short haul, in high school what that meant in practice was
that Sam would actually literally do Si’s projects which got him pass the
required art classes and allowed him to graduate.
That is the negative Si art part which has been
well-documented and spoken to without reference to Georgia O’Keeffe whom he was
totally unaware of until a later point when he met Kathie who would become his
first wife. After high school, after the Army, after Vietnam which caused more
gnashing of teeth and disorientation among their, my generation that we will
ever be able to explain Si was a mess, was all over the place as far as finding
his place in the sun. Then one night he went to a bar in I think Kenmore Square
in Boston and met Kathie who was a student at the Museum School affiliated with
the MFA and she swept him off his feet. She was several years younger than he
but was like a breath of fresh air after Vietnam, after drifting. He never
mentioned his personal history with the subject of art that night, but he just
let her go on and on about her dreams and about her influences. The dream part
he got but he was totally ignorant of the artists she was talking about except
the villain Renoir (among those artists mentioned Marc Chagall, Cezanne, Mark
Rothko, and Georgia O’Keeffe whom he drew a blank on although later he would
remember some girl he had been dating in college had a calendar of the latter’s
flower works highlighting each month. It was on their second date after a few
drinks at dinner that he mentioned that eighth grade incident at the MFA
partially to see if that would disqualify him forever from being with Kathie
for being a low-life about art. She laughed and asked, no, commanded him that
if he wanted to see her again he would have to go to the MFA with her, meeting
her there that next weekend.
Holding his nose and knowing that he was ready to do a lot
to keep her company as latter marrying and staying with her for seven years
before he, not she, went off the deep end over his Vietnam experience-again,
testified to, that next Saturday he met her there just after it opened. As we
can in retrospect have expected Si was thrilled with the museum, with the works
of art and with Kathie’s patient explanation of what some of the works meant
for the art world and for human culture. Even the dreaded Renoir bathing maiden
painting drew his positive attention and gave him a whole new perspective on
the use of color and space (Cezanne would be his go-to guy though on those two
characteristics and still is). What Kathie really got excited about though was
when she practically genuflected in front of the O’Keeffe paintings which caused
her to swoon a little. Si flipped out not in the silly eighth-grade naïve way
but after Kathie told him what she (via art critics if not the artist herself
thought was represented by the swirls and crevices in the flower paintings and
a few desert scenes as well) thought the paintings symbolized, the vaginal
sexual blossoming part. For a couple more dates before they went to bed
together (what Sam calls “getting under the silky sheets” which has its own
charms as an expression) they would talk about the O’Keeffe works in what I
considered when I heard that part of the story as some kind of “foreplay.” By
the way after they did finally sleep together for the next date Si told Kathie
she should meet him at the MFA to continue his education. And he has been on
the “cure” ever since. What more can I add.
What more can I add indeed since I mentioned that I would
give my own “take” on Ms. O’Keeffe’s work, its sensual aspect. Si and about a
million others have already laid out the sexual implications of her flower
explosions and like him are ready to leave it there. That is only a small part
of the story, a very small part. O’Keeffe spent a fair among of time up at
Stieglitz’s family estate near Lake George in upstate New York. There she did a
large number of barn scenes in the modern flat style. What almost no critic and
maybe none has noticed or at least mentioned in the public prints is the subtle
triangular shapes which mesh with each other forming a quite provocative
coupling, a sexual coupling, sexual congress if you like. That triangular shape
the definitive symbol of the female pubic area and the silos of course the
phallic symbols.
If that was the only time, after all Ms. O’Keeffe was young
and in love, or thought she was before the other shoe fell and the love-hate
relationship between her and Stieglitz rivaled that of Frida Kahlo and Diego
Rivera in that part of the 20th century then I would defer to the
professional art cabal take on that part of her career. But that begs the
question about those skyscrapers she was so fond of painting. Skyscrapers that
it would not take a Freud or even Jung to figure out were related to modern,
really ancient if you think about it, phallic representational art. I have
noted the seeming ominous position of the clouds in some representing the female
pubic area preparing “to be taken” or to “take” those obvious phallic symbols.
In others the positions are reversed and the phallic symbols enter deep into
the almost subterranean earth. A couple were so provocative I had to leave the
viewing area for a bit to “cool off.” Here the modern art critic, art viewer
could learn something about our times. The Greeks, maybe lesser so the Romans,
were not afraid to put every kind of phallic symbol, romping penises in many
cases both heterosexual and homosexual on their prized possession vases and
pots. The modern sensibility is not nearly out-front and so takes the symbolism
that Freud wrote so energetically of and Jung went crazy about, of the
subconscious, the deep sexual urges in more guarded forms. Those ideas are
still amazing true for artists even in the pornographic overkill Internet age.
This last example, the one that will shock many people and
will sent so-called professional art critics and their hangers-on in the wide
net art cabal into spasms of rage and hubris is Ms. O’Keeffe work out in New
Mexico, out at the Ghost Ranch and other locales adjacent to the desert and
nearby cliffs and mountains. If you only look at the brilliant colors she used,
some very original tones since she was a pioneer desert artist then you will
miss what became obvious to me proto-sexual relationship exhibited once again
in that guarded form so typical of 20th century art. It is amazing
how many of the glorious mountain views have a female form which either are “on
top” in the subtle sexual congress being depicted or are “wide open” to some
very provocative cloud formations.
Agreed, a whole new look at Ms. O’Keeffe’s work which I
might not have thought of except that at a recent, well maybe not so recent
since it was a couple of years ago, exhibition of her work at the Peabody-Essex
Museum in Salem, Massachusetts there were an amazing number of photographs of
her nude taken by Stieglitz while they were having their affair, married or
separated. Now Georgia was no professional beauty like Sargent’s Madame X or Whistler’s The White Girl but she had a good figure
and apparently an uninhibited persona in that regard which gave me a new look
at her work. The professional art crowd, the uptight, grappling art cabal will
howl in the winds over this but if I could take the heat from the sex police
Puritan evangelicals who mercifully have flee from my view since I have started
working on 20th century art which they consider the work of the
devil and me his servant then I can handle these cocktail hour buffs.
No comments:
Post a Comment