WARS
ABROAD, WARS AT HOME
AMERICA REVISITS THE
DARK SIDE:
Candidates Compete to
Promise the Most Torture and Slaughter
From the look of
the presidential campaign, war crimes are back on the American agenda. We really
shouldn’t be surprised, because American officials got away with it last time --
and in the case of the drone wars continue to get
away with it today. Still, there’s nothing like the heady combination of a
“populist” Republican race for the presidency and a national hysteria over
terrorism to make Americans want to reach for those “enhanced interrogation
techniques.” … In August 2014, when President Obama finally admitted that “we tortured some folks,” he added a warning.
The recent history of U.S. torture, he said, “needs to be understood and
accepted. We have to as a country take responsibility for that so hopefully we
don’t do it again in the future.” By pinning the responsibility for torture on
all of us “as a country,” Obama avoided holding any of the actual perpetrators
to account. More
Armed far-right
anti-government militants occupied a federal building in Oregon late on January
2 and announced they would remain there indefinitely. Although the armed
occupation was ostensibly organized to protest the imprisonment of ranchers on
arson charges, the ultra-conservative militants made it clear from the beginning
that they were willing to use violence, and hoped to inspire a larger
anti-government uprising. Major US media outlets ignored these basic facts,
nevertheless, instead characterizing the far-right militants as peaceful
“ranchers’ rights protesters” and “activists.” More
The racial double
standard at the heart of the new Bundy family standoff
At least 150
armed white men have seized control of a federal building outside of Burns,
Oregon. They are led by a cadre which includes Ammon and Ryan Bundy. They are
the sons of Cliven Bundy, the rancher who led a successful armed rebellion
against federal law enforcement officers in Nevada last year. Since that event, Ammon and Ryan Bundy have been traveling the
United States, meeting with other white “militia” groups, and inciting violence
against the federal government… African-American protesters in Ferguson were met
with lethal rounds from police, faced down by snipers, were bludgeoned with
nightsticks, shot with rubber and wooden bullets, spied upon by drones, and
shown the full range of power that is capable of being summoned by America’s
hyper-militarized police forces. The protesters in Ferguson were also confronted
by the National Guard—a step that the governor of Oregon has so far not taken in
order to neutralize the estimated 150 armed white men who are making terrorist
threats and engaging in armed insurrection in his state. More
GOING TO EXTREMES:
The extremism behind
the growing movement to seize America’s public lands
Last week, armed
members of the Oath Keepers and other militias arrived at a mine in Montana,
posting “no trespassing” signs on public land. The operation
is the latest in a string of standoffs involving extremist groups that refuse to
recognize the authority of the U.S. government, including incidents at the Sugar Pine Mine in Oregon and Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Nevada. A new investigation by the
non-partisan watchdog Center for Western Priorities has uncovered wide-ranging
ties between those extremist groups and Western legislators involved in a
coordinated effort to take our national lands from the American people.
More
JESSE JACKSON: Gun
control alone can't curb violence
Gun control
doesn’t cost much. America has another abiding challenge — the explosive
catastrophe of urban poverty — that also goes unmet. The City Observatory, an
urban policy think tank in Portland, Ore., reports that the number of
high-poverty urban neighborhoods in the nation’s 51 largest cities tripled — to
3,100 — between 1970 and 2010. The number of poor persons living in those areas
doubled over those years. The poor are more isolated and concentrated than ever…
To deal with our impoverished neighborhoods, it isn’t enough to get rid of the
guns. The public squalor of our inner cities has to be addressed: schools
modernized, affordable housing built, mass transit supplied, available jobs
created. Dealing with entrenched poverty costs real money, but less than we
spend on the police, jails, drugs, alcoholism, and chronic illness — the
dysfunction that comes from poverty. More
Why Is the US
Deporting Refugee Families?
The White House
rang in the New Year by slamming the gates on refugee families seeking
sanctuary. Immigration and Customs Enforcementm (ICE) announced quietly, in the
midst of the holiday break, that it would begin raiding and deporting Central
American families who have failed to qualify for asylum. Their impending exile,
according to ICE, is a matter of upholding rule of law, apparently to make it
clear that the United States takes border control seriously and seeks to somehow
deter mass migration. The law the Obama administration is following, immigrant
advocates say, runs counter to the higher mandate the White House should be
abiding by. International humanitarian law actually dictates that these
desperate parents and children be granted protection from the persecution and
violence they have fled in their home countries. More
Add your name to Open Letter to Pres.
Obama –
STOP DEPORTING CENTRAL AMERICAN
FAMILIES
Recent news
reports revealed that the Department of Homeland Security plans to hunt down
Central American mothers and children who have fled to this country for their
lives. “The adults and children would be detained wherever they can be found
and immediately deported." (Washington Post, 12/23/15) We, the undersigned --
members of faith communities, medical and legal professionals, concerned
Massachusetts residents -- are profoundly troubled by this move against
vulnerable refugee families. While the planned operation is said to target only
adults and children who have been ordered removed by an immigration judge, the
court system that generates these orders is seriously broken. Sign here
Landmark Settlement
in Challenge to NYPD Surveillance of New York Muslims
The ACLU, the
New York Civil Liberties Union, and the CLEAR project at CUNY School of Law
filed the suit in 2013. The law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP joined the
litigation team soon after. The lawsuit charged that the NYPD mapped Muslim
communities and their institutions, sent officers and informants into mosques to
monitor innocent religious leaders and congregants, and used other invasive
means to spy on Muslims. "This settlement is a win for New York Muslims and for
all New Yorkers, who have a right to be free from discriminatory police
surveillance and to practice their religion without stigma or fear." The
settlement, which is subject to court approval, imposes a number of important
safeguards to ensure the NYPD’s investigative practices are in line with the
protections of the Constitution. These include a robust
anti-religious-discrimination policy, safeguards to constrain intrusive
investigatory practices, a limitation on the use of undercover officers and
informants, and — critically — the appointment of an outside civilian
representative to ensure all safeguards are followed and enforced.
More
No comments:
Post a Comment