Train Smoke And Dreams-The Film
Adaptation of Paula Hawkins’ “The Girl On The Train”-(2016)
By Sam Lowell
The Girl On The Train, starring Emily
Blunt, Rebecca Ferguson, Haley Bennett, directed by Tate Taylor, from the
thriller novel by Paula Hawkins, 2016
A tale of three women, three smart up
and coming but troubled women, suburban women, suburban New York City women and
that makes a difference, is an interesting way to introduce this cinematic
thriller, Girl On The Train, adapted for
the screen from the best-selling novel by Paula Hawkins. Especially since their
lives, the lives of Rachael, Anna and Megan to give them names right at the
start, are intertwined one way or another by the same man, Tom, a man who as
one of the minor characters in the film stated rather succinctly if crudely could
not “keep his dick in his pants.” That statement, made on the suburban commuter
train from New York City, the train a symbolic metaphor for lots of what goes
down along the way, toward the end of the film goes a long way to explaining
why this well-done and suspenseful thriller ends the way it does.
Here’s the scoop. Woman number one,
Rachel, played by Emily Blunt, smart, artistic but emotionally fragile and unsure
of herself, had as a result of her spiraling alcoholism brought on by her
failure to bear a child (and by the nefarious manipulations of philandering Tom)
been unceremoniously dumped by her philandering husband, Tom, for another
woman, woman number two, Anna, who had borne him a child. Rachel was a dreamer, a romantic, had some almost
child-like idea of what a leafy suburban perfect marriage might look like despite
her alcoholic haze which during her binges had left her with big blank spaces
in her memory, left her with blackouts. It is in trying to retrace the steps of
her life that will finally aid her-and get her and other into a hell of a lot
of trouble.
The romantic dreamer about some ideal
marriage part for Rachel came when she passed her old neighborhood on the train
she took every day supposedly going to and from work (she had been fired for
her over-the-top alcoholic behavior and had been fired so the trips back and
forth to New York City were trips to nowhere). A few houses from where she
lived she spied a couple who look like they were the consummate expression of
everything she still longed for-including reuniting with her husband.
Enter woman number three, Megan, played
by Haley Bennett, young, neurotic and sexually promiscuous, who was the woman
Rachel had seen from the train. Megan rather than the ideal suburban wife was
seeing a psychiatrist about her problems (while trying to seduce him). And
about the secret guilt she had felt ever since she had neglected her
out-of-wedlock baby when she was a teenager. Megan had worked for Tom and Anna,
who had her own set of emotional problems around having the child and having a
philandering husband, as a nanny to complete the scene (a job that it turned
out Tom had insisted she take).
Here is where things got dicey. Megan
one night went missing, and would be found after some time dead in the woods along
the nearby Hudson River, an obvious homicide. Rachel, in one of her less lucid
and less sober moments witnessed a scene from one end of a tunnel where Megan,
who had disillusioned Rachel from the train by apparently taking another lover,
and somebody had been seen together the night she disappeared. The rest of the
film unwinds around Rachel’s increased clarity and confidence in herself about
what had happened that night, who had killed Megan and why. Naturally there is
plenty of misdirection as in any good thriller. Rachel herself had come under
suspicion due to her erratic and at times near hysterical behavior. As had,
naturally given the statistics on such matters, Megan’s overbearing and
overwrought husband (with a little help from trying to be helpful Rachel).
Hell, even the shrink, Megan’s shrink, based on Rachel’s faulty foggy memory,
was under a cloud for a time. But as the film winds down and the possible
candidates with the motive to do the foul deed dwindle Rachel’s sense of what
happened that night and who might have committed the foul deed improved.
Although this film (and the book it is based
on) is predicated on solving the murder mystery which sets up the plot I was
struck by how much these three very different women had been thrown together by
an odd fate and reacted to things in very ways. The acting by the trio, particularly
Emily Blunt whose very complicated role drove the action but also drove the psychological
aspects of the film, was excellent as the three women went through their respective
paces. As for whodunit check it out for yourself if you have not already read
the book. A way better than average thriller.
No comments:
Post a Comment