From The Living
Archives Of Boston Veterans For Peace-They Ain't Your Grandfather's Veterans- A Few Notes For The General Meeting On The Poor Peoples Campaign Of 1968 As Food For Thought As We Prepare From The Second And Hopefully Final Campaign in 2018
By Site Manager Greg
Green
[Ralph Morris who has
lived in Troy, New York most of his life, been raised there and raised his own
family there, went to war, the bloody, horrendous Vietnam War which he has made
plain many times he will never live down, never get over what he did, what he
saw others do, and most importantly for the long haul, what his evil government
did with no remorse to people in that benighted country with whom he had no
quarrel never was much for organizations, joining organizations when he was
young until he came upon a group formed in the fire of the Vietnam War protests
-Vietnam Veteran Against the War (VVAW) which he joined after watching a
contingent of them pass by in silent march protesting the war in downtown
Albany one fall afternoon. Somebody in that contingent with a microphone called
out to any veterans observing the march who had had enough of war, had felt
like that did to “fall in” (an old army term well if bitterly remembered). He
did and has never looked back although for the past many years his affiliation
has been with a subsequent anti-war veterans’ group Veterans for Peace.
Sam Eaton, who has
lived in Carver, Massachusetts, most of his life, been raised there and raised
his own family there, and did not go to war. Did not go for the simple reason
that due to a severe childhood accident which left him limping severely thereafter
he was declared no fit for military duty, 4-F the term the local draft board
used. He too had not been much for organizations, joining organizations when he
was young. That is until his best friend from high school, Jeff Mullins, died
in hell-hole Vietnam and before he had died asked Sam that if anything happened
to him to let the world that he had done things, had seen others do things, and
most importantly for the long haul, what his evil government did with no
remorse to people in that benighted country with whom he had no quarrel. As
part of honoring Jeff’s request after Sam found out about his death he was like
a whirling dervish joining one anti-war action after another, joining one ad
hoc group, each more radical than the previous one as the war ground away,
ground all rational approach vapid, let nothing left but to go left, until the
fateful day when he met Ralph down in Washington, D.C.
That was when both in
their respective collectives, Ralph in VVAW and Sam in Cambridge Red Front,
were collectively attempting one last desperate effort to end the war by
closing down the government if it would not shut down the war. All they got for
their efforts were tear gas, police batons, arrest bracelets and a trip to the
bastinado which was the floor of Robert F. Kennedy stadium which is where they
would meet after Sam noticed Ralph’s VVAW pin and told him about Jeff and his
request. That experience would form a lasting friendship including several
years ago Sam joining Ralph’s Veterans for Peace as a supporter, an active
supporter still trying to honor his long- gone friend’s request and memory.
No one least of all
either of them would claim they were organizing geniuses, far from it but over
the years they participated, maybe even helped organize many anti-war events.
One day their friend, Josh Breslin, who writes a by-line at this publication, and
who is also a veteran asked them to send some of events they had participated
in here to form a sort of living archives of the few remaining activist
groupings in this country, in America who are still waging the struggle for
peace.
Periodically, since we
are something of a clearing house and historic memory for leftist activities,
we will put their archival experiences into our archives. As mentioned above
Sam and Ralph “met” each other down in Washington, D.C. during the May Day
anti-war demonstrations of 1971 when out of desperation clots of anti-war
radicals, veterans and civilians alike, tried unsuccessfully to shut down the
government if it would not shut down the war. They “met,” their in forever
quotation marks not mine, on the floor of Robert F. Kennedy football stadium after
they had been arrested along with members of their respective collectives,
Ralph’s VVAW and Sam’s Red Front Brigade after getting nothing but tear gas,
police batons and a ride in the paddy wagon for their efforts. What they were
doing, what for each of the them, according to Josh Breslin who met them
shortly after they got “sprung,” also then a member of VVAW and also arrested but
had been held in a D.C. city jail, were their first acts of civil disobedience.
The first of a long time of such actions which is the lead in to the archival
material presented in this piece.
Josh, who introduced
the pair to me several years ago when I first came on board to manage the day
to day operations of this publication after Allan Jackson, aging and ready to
retire, brought me on board for that purpose so he could work on where the
publication was heading. He mentioned the Washington action as their calling
card although then, in 1971, I was about a decade too young to have realized
what they were doing and how important it was for their future political
trajectories, their political commitments to “fight the monster,” their term,
on the questions of war and peace and other social issues. Not have realized,
not having done any such actions how important civil disobedience, or the
threat of such actions was, is to their political perspectives.
By the way, as Josh
was at pains under pressure from Ralph and Sam, to report to me that May Day
action was not the first attempt by either man to “get arrested,” to “put their
bodies on the line” as Sam articulated it to me one night when we were putting
this piece together. May Day was just the first time when the cops, National
Guard, Regular Army was willing, with a vengeance, to take them up on the offer.
Both men had tried repeatedly to get arrested “sitting down” at their
respective local draft boards in Carver and Troy in order to warn off young men
on signing up for the draft. Maybe it was the nature of the times but the local
police would not arrest them.]
A Few Notes For The
General Meeting On The Poor Peoples Campaign Of 1968 As Food For Thought As We
Prepare From The Second And Hopefully Final Campaign in 2018
[As many of you know
this is the 50th anniversary of the original Poor Peoples Campaign
of 1968. Over the past several months to a year various individuals and
organizations have organized around many of those original themes of bringing
the poor into some kind of equality in this society. Over the next several
weeks there will be weekly actions here locally and a mass rally in Washington
around specific grievances. Smedley is knee-deep in the local planning so to
give some thoughts about the original campaign is what our May GM discussion
period is about. Since we have a big agenda I have written some notes so that
we can go to the discussion part directly and save some time. These notes will
also be in hard copy at the GM. Allan Jackson
]
*******
As a long ago
philosopher pointed out those who do not remember history are condemned to
relive it. That point is what drives this discussion about what happened to the
first Poor Peoples Campaign in 1968. It does not pretend to be all-inclusive
nor more than one person’s take on those times and that event.
At the most general
level the original PPC was a dramatic defeat for the struggles of the poor and
oppressed of this country. To understand some of the reasons behind that defeat
beyond the murder of the prime mover of the campaign Doctor King will help us
to push forward. In a sense the PPC was poorly timed since 1968 as many of us
older activists know was a hell-bent year with the Tet offensive finally
showing Americans we could not “win” in Vietnam, the refusal of the sitting
president, LBJ, to run again, the two assassinations of iconic progressive
figures in King and Bobby Kennedy who were in their respective ways driving
forces behind the campaign, the turmoil in the streets here and internationally
with the May Days in France and the chaos and horror of the Democratic
Convention in the summer of that year. So the PPC had to fight for breathe
against those more dramatic events and got pushed to the side rather easily
especially after King’s murder and some inner turmoil and in-fighting among the
leadership.
The PPC was ill-timed
and ill-starred in another way. Frankly the heroic black civil rights struggle
down South which brought about massive increases in voting rights and some
other positive benefits did not after 1965 put much of a dent in the oppression
of black people and other minorities around housing, jobs, education,
healthcare and the like. With the Vietnam War sucking the life out of Lyndon
Johnson’s modern day version of “forty acres and a mule” the war on poverty at
a governmental level fell apart. Liberals, governmental and private citizens, began
the long retreat away from governmental attempts to alleviate poverty which
continues to this day witness the demise of the social welfare programs started
under the Clinton administration. Moreover a reaction set in around the
question of race when the cities started burning up as a result of the denial
of legitimate grievances by the black community and its allies in other
minority communities.
The elephant in the room though and fifty years of myth creation
around the hallowed name of Doctor King cannot cover the fact up that he as a
leader of the black community had lost some authority by pre-Vietnam speech
1967, has been upended by more militant blacks from various vocal anti-integrationist
black nationalists to the upfront romantic if doomed Black Panthers. Think
about the evolution of the previously intergrated SNCC once black power became
a widespread slogan, especially among the young non-churched types. King was
the number one symbol of black integration when the moods in the black
community was heading elsewhere. Those of us in the military in those days got
a taste of that in off-hours when there was very little interaction between the
races. King through his belated and now famous anti-Vietnam War speech and his
support of the sanitation workers in Memphis was making something of a
“comeback” and the PPC was to be at least the symbolic way to get his agenda
back on the front pages.
This political, social
and personal backdrop does not take away from what was attempted, and what was
necessary given the other factors particularly the retreat by the liberals from
advocacy of many social programs and the hostility of others to even dealing
with the poverty problem any longer. A
look at the PPC program tells us that much. It also highlights not only the
social reality of the times but that like the heroic struggle for formal civils
rights the poor and oppressed were going to have to fight for the better
housing, healthcare, education and the like since few others were committed to
their cause. The need for the poor and oppressed to lead and fight for what
they need which never really happened in 1968 and is the wave of the future of
the current campaigns really is the only long-term way forward in order to
break the cycle of poverty and the pathologies that gut-level struggle for
survival engenders. Something which grouping up in the projects I was
personally painfully aware of as a kid.
A few nuts and bolts
facts about the 1968 PPC will show that many of the same issues still need
addressing, some of the same organizing tactics are in play as well from multiracial,
multicultural meetings of poor people and their advocates which the ruling
class in its constant strategy of “divide and conquer” hates to see to some
programmatic demands. In March of 1968 many poverty-centered organizations like
the National Welfare Rights Organization and the Southern Regional Council
joined with Doctor King’s organization, the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference, in Atlantic to forge a common program to fight on. To list the
three major demands today seems utopian (and way underestimating the money that
would be needed today) but still necessary to fight around:
·
$30 billion annual
appropriation for a real war on poverty
·
Congressional passage of
full employment and guaranteed income legislation [a guaranteed annual wage]
·
Construction of 500,000
low-cost housing units per year until slums were eliminated
To highlight these demands
the campaign would be divided into three phases, the first to create a
permitted shanty town of several thousand people which came to be called
Resurrection City on the National Mall, the second to begin protest
demonstrations and mass non-violent civil disobedience actions and third to
take actions to generate mass arrests like those which brought national
attention to the plight of blacks in the South around voting rights. The latter
two phases are the touchstone of the 2018 campaign as well.
To bring people to Washington
several “caravans” were organized from all regions of the country to meet in
June of 1968 with a big solidarity rally which brought some 50, 000 people to
D.C. to join the estimated 3000 that were “residing” on the Mall.
Bayard Rustin put forth
a proposal for an “Economic Bill of Rights” for Solidarity Day that called for
the federal government to most of which still are the wave of the future:
Recommit to the Full Employment Act of 1946
and legislate the immediate creation of at least one million socially useful
career jobs in public service, adopt the pending housing and urban development
act of 1968, repeal the 90th Congress’s
punitive welfare restrictions in the 1967 Social Security Act, extend to all
farm workers the right–guaranteed under the National Labor Relations Act–to
organize agricultural labor unions, and restore budget cuts for bilingual
education, Head Start, summer jobs, Economic Opportunity Act, Elementary and
Secondary Education Acts
I have addressed some of
the problems and social conditions which helped undermine that first campaign
and others can add more from their recollections of the times including the
question of post-King murder leadership and in-fighting. Hopefully the latter
will not be an issue in the new movement.
There are some
differences in the current campaign from that of 1968 that I think are worth
noting as we gear up the campaign. First, if we are to be successful this time,
real poor people and members of oppressed communities will have to take
leadership roles, make their mistakes and learn from them. Just like we did,
do. Our role is one of support to see that such leadership emerges which I
believe was a real short-coming of the “professional” organizer from Doctor
King on down model in 1968. Second we are “demanding” similar programs to those
of 1968 but not “begging” the government to implement as some criticized the
1968 campaign for doing. Lastly, and unfortunately, there are several more issues
that the 1968 campaign did not have to address as forcefully like an end to
mass black and Latino incarceration and the war on drugs which has decimated
communities of color and sapped it of a young, mostly male, leadership
component.
No comments:
Post a Comment