When The Thin Man Was
Fat -With The Original Film Adaptation of Dashiell Hammett’s The Thin
Man In Mind
By Josh Breslin
Recently in a review of
the fourth in the famous Myrna Loy-William Powell seemingly never-ending 1930s-1940s
The Thin Man series, Shadow Of The Thin Man, I mentioned that
a long time ago, or it now seems a long time ago, I had a running argument with
the late film critic Henry Dowd about the alleged decline in manly film
detectives after the time of Dashiell Hammett’s Sam Spade and Raymond
Chandler’s Phillip Marlowe in the 1940s. By that Henry meant tough guy, no
holds barred, non-filter cigarette smoking, Luckies or Camels, bottom of the
desk drawer hard shell whiskey neat drinking, who didn’t mind taking or giving
a punch, or taking or giving a random slug for the cause detectives.
He had based his opinion strictly on viewing the films of the famous detective
couple Nick and Nora Charles.
Henry Dowd believed that
with the rise of The Thin Man series that previous
characterization of a model detective, his previous characterization Henry was
given to the imperative tone, switched from the hard whiskey drinking guy to a
soft martini swigging suave guy with a soft manner and an aversion to taking
risks, certainly to taking punches or slugs. Hell, in that film under review at
the time not only had Nick been married to Nora but they had a kid, not to
mention that damn dog Asta, a regular entourage to weigh a guy down. Back in
the day what had surprised Henry in our public prints argument had been when I
told him that the same guy, Dashiell Hammett, who had written the heroic tough
guy detective Sam Spade had also written the dapper Nick and charming Nora
characters. Henry did not believe me until I produced my tattered copy of
Hammett’s The Thin Man which had started the whole film
series. Thereafter he kept up the same argument except placing The Thin Man as an aberration probably
do to Hammett’s known heavy drinking or that he was trying to soften his own
Stalinist-etched persona with such an obvious bourgeois couple. Jesus.
My objection to Henry’s
“decline of the manly” detective theory back then had not been so much about the
social manners or the social class of the couple in the series, a reversion to
the parlor detective genre before Hammett and Chandler brought the genre out of
the closet and onto the streets, as the thinness of the plots as they rolled
out each new product. I continue to tout the original film in series The Thin Man as the one everybody should
view and take in the rest if you have restless hour and one half or so to
whittle away.
I had held my viewing of
Shadow up as a case in point. I
mentioned above all that the affable Nick and Nora would get involved in the
murder case of a jockey who allegedly threw a horse race. The very notion that
anybody, much less a private eye, would give more than a passing glance to the
demise an allegedly corrupt jockey was beyond me. After all the indignities
those curs have thrown my way whenever I have had a “sure thing” has given me a
very cynical view of these professionals. Has left me teary-eyed at my bad
luck-or ready to shoot one myself. Of course if you are talking about throwing
horse races then you have to deal with the question of the mob and all the
connections to that organization from law enforcement to track officials. And
in a roundabout way this is how Nick with a little timely intervention by Nora
solved that one thereby exonerating that fallen jockey (and a newspaper guy
too). Bringing a high-born connected guy down to boot. Enough said.
Enough said except that
I also mentioned that if one had just one film in the series then you had to
opt for the original one based far more closely on that tattered copy of
Hammett’s crime novel. Those were the days when Nick, still besotted by Nora,
but not knocked over by her could work up the energy to do more than mix
martinis. (Or to revive the old Dowd argument before Hammett let the bottle get
to him or while working under the umbrella of Popular Front days directed from
red Moscow).
Of course even then Nick
had been softened up a little by some time out in gentle, gentile Frisco town but
once he hit New York he put on his stern working face when the daughter of an
ex-client attempted to find out where her father had taken off too. Taken off
after a couple of murders fouled up the scene. See that old man, that thin man,
had been running around with a dizzy dame who was two-timing him and so all
eyes pointed in his absent direction. Only got more heated when a guy who saw
the murderer got wasted by same. Looked
like the old man would take the big step-off, take a last breathe that he would
not like.
Except in those days
although Nick was allegedly “retired” he kicked out the jams long enough to
find out that the whole thing was a scam, was all smoke and mirrors by
somebody, not the thin man. Along the way Nick outsmarts the public coppers,
not so hard to do when they put their two and two together and it came up five.
Two murders and a missing boyfriend, the old man, and they had him all wrapped
up and tied with a ribbon. One little problem: the old man, the thin man, this
Wynant to give him a name was dead, very dead and had been so of a couple of
months after Nick figured out where the body was buried (okay, okay with a
little sniffing help from Asta) so the public coppers had egg all over their
faces. You might be surprised by who actually did the deed, did the three
murders and would surely take the big step-off, be gasping for breath at the
end, but you can watch the film to see that worked out. What is important is
that Nick, drunk or sober, dapper or not, seemingly lazy or not, too laid back
or not grabbed the right person, solved the damn mystery without working up
serious sweat. And without getting bopped on the head, or taking some slugs.
Enough said.
No comments:
Post a Comment