The Continuing
Saga Of Who Is The Real Bond, James Bond- A Ringer’s Story-Roger Moore’s “For
Your Eyes Only” (1981)-A Film Review
DVD Review
By Seth Garth
For Your
Eyes Only, starring Roger Moore, 1981
Apparently
the story within the story of who the real Bond, James Bond is will go on as
least as long as the freaking producers are willing to put up cold hard cash to
see who still gives a damn about the question. I thought I had been done, had finished
with this question once Will Bradley conceded that Sean Connery was head and
shoulders the best of the lot (conceded by silence, by giving up the ghost of
trying to keep going with his ill-conceived premise, an almost laughable one that
one pretty boy Pierce Brosnan was the One). Nobody else was even considered
worthy enough to have a champion and make the argument multi-faceted. (By the
way that Connery-Brosnan controversy, what my old friend Sam Lowell, the legendary
film critic who still wanders the cinematic world with a large shadow behind
him, has called on more than one occasion a tempest in teapot had no serious other
contenders at the time-now either) Two events though have cast a long shadow over
the question. The news of recent origin that one Idris Elba British to the core
but as black as night was being considered for the role of Bond in some future episode
which will put a whole new spin of the question and a possible recasting of the
standings of the “others” who fill out the ranks of who have played Bond when I
did an off-hand review of George Lazenby’s
solo 1969 performance in On Her Majesty’s
Secret Service which put him at the bottom of the list. That got me, if not
battered and bruised Will Bradley, rethinking the placement order which meant having
to watch, re-watch a Roger Moore Bond film, For
Your Eyes Only, among others to see who would take the coveted third spot
now that George Lazenby is comfortably seated in last place. This is necessarily
provincial since if the Elba rumor turns out to be true we could have the whole
apple cart upset.
Since I have
no competition as of yet over who will fill out the “third through” ranks I will
argue that Roger Moore, a little woodenly, a little less spritely than either
Connery or Brosnan, and a little less technologically competent that Brosnan
and less suave and off-handed than Connery nevertheless should fill the third
slot. Not because the story line is qualitatively better than any of the others-they
divide simply between the more interesting since more realistic Cold War Soviet
as main enemy films and the post-Soviet demise amorphous international criminal
cartels films and not much more since all are threats to Her Majesty’s reign
and governments and so much fodder for ace Empire hitman Bond the only person standing
between the continued regime and chaos.
This film follows
the tried and true Soviets as villain formula. Somebody, some third party, has blown
away an important spy ship containing an important defense gizmo which will
save the Empire and all civilization as we know it will be sunk if the damn Soviet’s
get their greedy hands on the item. Problem: said system is located somewhere in
the briny deep and everybody is scrambling to get to the locale first and win the
prize. Enter Roger Moore as James Bond who of course has to go through hoops before
getting to the locale. Along the way there are the standard ruses and
deceptions, a few moves under the silky sheets and some hand to hand battles
with whatever passes for the latest technology-planes, submarines, skis, yes
skis as old James skis like he was an Olympian among his many other manly
skills. As a sign of the times, 1981, Bond rather than get the system back to
MI6, cornered and backed into a corner with the system by Russian agents throws
it off a cliff so nobody gets it-détente at work. All very civilized at the end
and Roger Moore seems to me to epitomize that calm, determined Bond needed by the
times when the Soviet Union was in trouble and who knows what would happen.
More later when we get a chance to view more Moore footage but for now he is king
of the number three spot.
No comments:
Post a Comment