The
Continuing Saga Of Who Is The Real Bond, James Bond- A Ringer’s Story-Roger
Moore’s “For Your Eyes Only” (1981)-A Film Review
DVD Review
By Seth
Garth
For Your
Eyes Only, starring Roger Moore, 1981
Apparently
the story within the story of who the real Bond, James Bond is will go on as
least as long as the freaking producers are willing to put up cold hard cash to
see who still gives a damn about the question. I thought I had been done, had
finished with this question once Will Bradley conceded that Sean Connery was
head and shoulders the best of the lot (conceded by silence, by giving up the
ghost of trying to keep going with his ill-conceived premise, an almost
laughable one that one pretty boy Pierce Brosnan was the One). Nobody else was
even considered worthy enough to have a champion and make the argument
multi-faceted. (By the way that Connery-Brosnan controversy, what my old friend
Sam Lowell, the legendary film critic who still wanders the cinematic world
with a large shadow behind him, has called on more than one occasion a tempest
in teapot had no serious other contenders at the time-now either) Two events
though have cast a long shadow over the question. The news of recent origin
that one Idris Elba British to the core but as black as night was being
considered for the role of Bond in some future episode which will put a whole
new spin of the question and a possible recasting of the standings of the
“others” who fill out the ranks of who have played Bond when I did an off-hand
review of George Lazenby’s solo 1969
performance in On Her Majesty’s Secret
Service which put him at the bottom of the list. That got me, if not
battered and bruised Will Bradley, rethinking the placement order which meant
having to watch, re-watch a Roger Moore Bond film, For Your Eyes Only, among others to see who would take the coveted
third spot now that George Lazenby is comfortably seated in last place. This is
necessarily provincial since if the Elba rumor turns out to be true we could
have the whole apple cart upset.
Since I have
no competition as of yet over who will fill out the “third through” ranks I
will argue that Roger Moore, a little woodenly, a little less spritely than
either Connery or Brosnan, and a little less technologically competent that
Brosnan and less suave and off-handed than Connery nevertheless should fill the
third slot. Not because the story line is qualitatively better than any of the
others-they divide simply between the more interesting since more realistic
Cold War Soviet as main enemy films as here and the post-Soviet demise
amorphous international criminal cartels films and not much more since all are
threats to Her Majesty’s reign and governments and so much fodder for ace
Empire hitman Bond the only person standing between the continued regime and
chaos.
This film
follows the tried and true Soviets as villain formula. Somebody, some third
party, has blown away an important spy ship containing an important defense
gizmo which will save the Empire and all civilization as we know it will be
sunk if the damn Soviet’s get their greedy hands on the item. Problem: said
system is located somewhere in the briny deep and everybody is scrambling to
get to the locale first and win the prize. Enter Roger Moore as James Bond who
of course has to go through hoops before getting to the locale. Along the way
there are the standard ruses and deceptions, a few moves under the silky sheets
and some hand to hand battles with whatever passes for the latest
technology-planes, submarines, skis, yes skis as old James skis like he was an
Olympian among his many other manly skills. As a sign of the times, 1981, Bond
rather than get the system back to MI6, cornered and backed into a corner with
the system by Russian agents throws it off a cliff so nobody gets it-détente at
work. All very civilized at the end and Roger Moore seems to me to epitomize
that calm, determined Bond needed by the times when the Soviet Union was in
trouble and who knows what would happen. More later when we get a chance to
view more Moore footage but for now he is king of the number three spot.
No comments:
Post a Comment